Video Transcript
what is it that you are working on right now and what are you most excited about going into the second half of this year? Yeah. So there there's a few things, you know, I know we're going to discuss the vacuum fluctuation propulsion work that I've been working for quite a while. Um, you know, still very excited about that, of course. And, you know, we're making some good progress in doing the experiments. You know, also the idea that, um, had with my colleague Mo Arman, um, about a coherent matter beam and how to put matter into coherence, kind of like you do with a laser, uh, is very exciting. I've always been drawn to that. But you know, I must say that the thing I'm excited the most about is sort of a new project and it's this idea of household resilience. So what are technologies that we can develop uh you know that are fairly simple and straightforward that can help people in disasters or you know with climate disruption and so that households like mine you know like you know people that were lucky enough to have a decent house but you know how are we going to survive when there's a hurricane or this or that and you know so there's some technologies we're working that can really help with that and so I'm pretty excited about that um sort of push into >> Oh I should have said guys shout out to Tim Ventur. I'll put a link in the chat here for you guys. Make sure you guys watch the live stream. We're watching on on fast speed and I will uh kind of give you any summaries of the key points here. But go ahead and check it out. Follow which which channel is this on? Oh, it's on his Tim Ventura channel. Follow Tim Ventur on his channel. Watch the APAC conferences. I mean, he gets the best interviews. So, there you go. this household resiliency through simple technologies. >> Yeah, that is really exciting and that's off my list. I just have to go from kind of memory and other things that I've read about that. But one of the things that my research has been showing me lately is and not a surprise to anyone. You know, global climate change does seem to be happening. Who caused that? I don't know. And that's topic for Chad. Why are they all obsessed with climate change? chat, I'm gonna have to debate. I'm gonna have to debate Tom Voluone on this climate change thing. We got to put this thing to bed. Chat, we got to come out. We got to let them know. If free energy is real, climate change is honestly just the dumbest thing ever. I mean, it's not that we You know what? Sure. We're we're changing the climate. You know what? Well, I'll even I'll even give you that point, but it's just like we can fix it so easily. It seems like such a silly thing to be worried about >> for another time. But like like myself, I tend >> people maybe do a disservice to to everybody if you know assuming that you have to simplify things very you know all the way. But I think people can really when when you get into the meat of it um you know it's very understandable you know I am not a coherent >> you know I don't have a PhD I'm kind of self-taught um you know so if I can understand it I feel like and explain it I feel like pretty much anyone can and but I want to say you know we don't pay much attention to our website unfortunately so we haven't updated that in a long time. uh the YouTube channel with all the talks are are really >> so I would like to put up my screen share now I am really excited about this what I tried to do was create some visualizations for the audience so that they would just intuitively understand some of the ideas that you're working on one of these the first one up here on the screen is the coherent matter wave beam for people who are hearing about this for the first time what are you trying to create >> yeah so we're trying to put particles like electrons or atoms in phase together like a laser. So a laser works you know with photons which is light by having them all be the same phase. In other words all marching together at the same time and you know all coherent you know all at the same instead of it you know um multiple different um phases or just not lined up. So we're trying to line that all up but instead of doing that with photons to do that with particles which are called firmians versus bzons which are and firmians are not known they cannot occupy the same state like a photon can but we think we've figured out a way um and it's really thanks to my colleague I mentioned before Dr. Mo Arman um who I worked with at Lockheed who originally came up with this idea and then we refined it. But it's a novel way of putting particles into coherence which no one has ever been able to do before. Um you know people chat I feel like this is what I just said. How different is this than what I just said is how you change an electromagnetic beam. He's saying here we want to take particles. We want to put them into phase, get them all lined up. And he's about to basically say that what we think of as matter is actually waves. Even though it doesn't seem that way, it really is. So this should be possible. I must say people do make what's called a Bose Einstein condensate, which is at super low temperatures, like almost absolute zero. Uh you know, you can make a single quantum state of particles. And so you know, why would we want that? Why do we want to do this is that um you know think of a beam that is a million times more powerful than a laser um which would have obvious applications but I think >> so [clears throat] why is what he just said there so important if I want to make a gravitational beam like I just told you guys getting something that's a million times more powerful than a laser it doesn't get us there but it gets us a lot further going to be a a lot easier if we can do it with matter than if we just have to do it with uh lasers. Might be possible with lasers still, but point is we're trying to get every little inch of energy density that we can get so that we can manipulate spaceime. And this is another mechanism that pushes us up a lot. According to Charles Chase a million times, that's six layers. So yes, this is basically a beam. This is a beam. when they talk about directed energy weapons and all that crazy stuff, this is what they're talking about. >> Even more exciting to me and I think since the last time we talked we've uh been focusing more on this area which is uh enabling new chemistry. >> So by controlling the phase of atoms uh we can make them combine in different ways. And so, you know, all molecules um are waves. You know, we think of them as particles, but they're actually >> Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. Stop there. Pause, chat. Wait. If we can control the phase of particles, we can do chemistry. We can get them to combine in different ways. H how is this different than fusion? How is this different than fusion? chat feels very very similar. In fact, I'm trying to figure out if you can do that, why can't you just do it with fusion, too? Why can't you reduce the cool barrier? If you have some kind of magical way where you can like do chemistry super easily, just logically in my mind, that feels like it should make fusion easier because it's basically the same thing. Okay. Yeah. Okay. People Okay, I'm not the only one saying that, right? I just want to make sure I'm not crazy here cuz I hear that I'm just thinking h this also seems like this could make fusion super super easy. Also, this is alchemy we're talking about now. We're talking about alchemy now. Now it's like why can't I just do Star Trek replicator if I can do this? You can 3D printing waves. People have measured waves of things like vitamins of you know all things right. So even very large atoms or molecules or waves and but by controlling the phase of those waves we can make them combine in different ways that um we currently can't do. So therefore uh you know combining atoms molecules together that's chemistry. So we can make new things and um also enable deposition on a very fine really small scale. Our calculations show down to 0.2 nanometers of resolution. So you can make uh new sort of structures and do like atomic assembly or um atomic uh direct manufacturing. And so that's >> Yeah. So like he's already listed about three things that can get your patent classified or get you killed. [laughter] We [clears throat] can make uh Star Trek replicators. We can make goybeams that are maybe manipulate gravity with this thing. We can do microchip lithography. That's at a super super tiny scale potentially down to the atomic scale lithography. Yeah. All these things are This is alien technology chat. You're looking for the alien technologies. Here you go. Here it is. Actually, doing that is easier than making a beam that that maintains coherence over a long distance because your working area for the new chemistry or for the deposition is a very small area. So we can maintain that coherence >> over that smaller area. And so I think that's a you know it's a shorter putt than making an actual beam. >> Okay. Okay. So I want to jump now. And again we have a lot of slides to go through. So I'm going to go over to Casemr effect energy. Again you are >> this is like this is like Charles Chase recapping the last two years of the science felony physics live streams. Casemir cavity. Now we're just going to what? Talk about Garrett Modell. We're just going to go through every single one of the engineers and their free energy microchips. Yes. Yes, we are. Here we go. Sweet. Okay. Awesome. This is like chat. This episode of the Ash and Forbes uh hard podcast live stream, whatever we call this, I forget. This is basically those midway episodes in the animes, like episode 13.5 where it's like a rehash stream, except for it's even better because there's all original content. Okay, here we go. We're >> working on the cutting edge. This is amazing stuff. This is uh Dr. Harold Sunonny White has just recently made headlines about this. Dr. Garrett Modell has been doing work and you have been collaborating with both of them. So you are right at the heart of this, but you are looking at this a little bit differently than they are, right? >> Yes. So um you know what you're showing there is illustrating the Casmir effect which is um you know the way people talk about the Kasmir effect is that in between a couple of plates you don't have as many vacuum modes as you do outside. And since there are fewer modes inside the plate than outside, you generate a pressure that pushes uh the plates together and that's called the kasmir effect. But you know I I really wanted to point out um that the kasmir effect does not prove the existence of the vacuum fluctuations. >> You know despite you know people commonly say that um you ask chat GPT that's what it'll tell you. But you can you can come up with the kasmir effect or predict the casemir effect using something called radiation reaction that you never use vacuum fluctuations at all. Same with other uh phenomena that people attribute to vacuum fluctuations like what's called the lamb shift which is a frequency shift. Uh you can >> chat it it might be over chat Charles Chase just debunked us chat I can't take all the black pills chat too many black pills. Lindsay Chansy didn't kill her children. Chat starting to get to me. He just told us he just destroyed us, chat. He said the lamb shift and the Casemir effect are not proof of zero point energy. He said radiation reaction, whatever that means. We'll Google it later. He says that can explain it. Chad, we might be cooked. we might be cooked. Chat >> also calculate that with radiation reaction not invoking the vacuum at all. Now you cannot have a um the quantum electronamics theory that you know we use for predicting all this stuff. You need a a bottom amount for that math to work. So for quantum electronamics to work, you need a fundamental fluctuation in that for the calculations to work. And you know they worked to what 17 17 um >> we got rescued chat. Quantum electronamics requires the fluctuations to exist decimal point of precision. You know quantum electronamics well proven but you need vacuum fluctuations for that theory to work. Does that say that vacuum fluction equations are real or is it that's just the way our theory works. So, you know, and people have measured like the interaction or uh between vacuum fluctuations and like electric fields and they back out with the vacuum fluctuation is. Has anyone actually seen a vacuum fluctuation? I don't I don't think so. But I so you know I just I think it's important to know that you know that the the fundamental aspect of that and yet like you said I am driven I I believe that uh vacuum fluctuations are real and that uh we can use them and uh you know and that's what what I've been pursuing with my resonant tunneling diode work where we can generate a force by creating an asymmetric situation where the vacuum fluctuations coupled to the tunneling current in the diode and that generates the the force. >> So, let me jump. >> So, what was important? Charles Chase believes vacuum fluctuations are real and we can tap into them. And Charles Chase knew Ben Rich. That's all I need to hear. Ben Rich said we can take ET home. Uh, that's good enough for me. Charles Chase is 0.0001% Loheed Martin fellow engineer in the revolutionary technologies division of the Loheed Martin skunk works. That's plenty enough for me to know that this dude's on some alien type 100%. I don't know if it comes with little green men or AI super intelligences. Doesn't really matter. He's on that He's into it. over to that since we're talking about vacuum fluctuation. That was the next slide. Casmmer effect sets that up. And so I'm so pleased. Let me apologize for for butting in there, but I'm so pleased that you're transitioning over to that because this is your idea. Also, there are several people working on cimer effect research. You're the only person I know of who is looking at utilizing some of this for vacuum fluctuation propulsion. >> Right. Right. And so, you know, that has been a dream of of many people over the years. you know there's been a lot of different concepts of how you can use the vacuum for generating >> forces um >> but I think we have something unique and and like I was saying it works um you have a what's called a resonant tunneling diode which has a um a quantum well which is you know say a two nanometer little area that electrons tunnel through. So even though the electrons don't have enough energy to actually pass through because inside the diode there's a voltage and um you know and that voltage drives a current but even at a level of voltage that's too high for the electrons to go through they do what's called tunneling through and so um the vacuum fluctuations will couple to that tunneling current and since you have this asymmetric situation with the potential the voltage uh inside the diode uh it creates a situation where the fluctuation move in a preferential direction and that generates a momentum. Now, >> okay. Wow. So, he says we're going to use this electromagnetism on the tiniest scales and we're going to create a quantum effect where our electrons are going to tunnel through a barrier they can't tunnel through. And when they do this, it's going to pull the zero point energy with them. It's going to pull the zero point energy with them. is going to give us a force, a unidirectional force. Sounds like a goybeam to me, chat. I don't know about you, I'm not uh, you know, I'm just a lowly healthcare IT guy, that sounds like a goybeam to me. Um, again, back to if you were going to ask a physicist, is that possible? They would say, no, hell no. You cannot do that because from some of our fundamental physics theories say that you can't. There's something called like a center of mass. So if you you know you can't you know you can't create momentum outside of a system right there's something called the the stress energy tensor which is from electromagnetics where you integrate the essentially all the forces around the body and that always comes to zero and then there's also energy considerations as well like unless you're breaking um time symmetry you can't uh generate energy or forces. So all these fundamental physical laws that we have um and we call them laws even though they're just what we think the way things work you know so law is probably a you know a lot of the words we use are crappy words um you know so even though it's it's a law so hell no you can't generate forces from a vacuum because and the vacuum fluctuations according to quantum electronamics the momentum of that in free space goes to zero at all times everywhere according to our theories >> so what's Charles Chase saying here. He's saying the NPCs don't get it. He's saying the people that haven't worked with the alien physics, they can't understand it. They say that you're cheating the laws of physics. You're breaking the laws of thermodynamics. That ain't possible. You can't do this. Well, what are they getting wrong? Because this is what I would have asked Charles. I would said, "Well, what are they getting wrong? Why are you right?" And you know what he's going to say? Because the vacuum fluctuations are real and the vacuum fluctuations can do work. We're not manipulating the actual object. We're manipulating the fluctuations that they don't think exists. The entire source of energy they don't think is even there. The same reason why they don't understand the ground state of the hydrogen atom. Because in their minds, their view is a atom that's in this perfect isolated state, not being disturbed, never running out of energy because it doesn't need to. But that's not really what's happening, is it? We have to go back to our initial preconceived notions about electromagnetism and re-evaluate them. The a vector potential was left out. You may say, Ashton, what does this mean? What does it actually mean? What does it matter? It means there really is an extra dimension. Really means that what we think of as the lowest ground state, it's not actually the lowest. It means this energy, they think there's no energy there to be tapped. It means it's actually probably infinite energy to be tapped. Like infinite. And our material science is simply not at the level right now because we're cavemen. We're ants. Our material science is just not at the level right now where we can tap it efficiently. But we will. We will. We 100% will.