Felony Physics - O is for Overunity

Video Transcript

Ashton Forbes, you know that super jacked guy. >> Malaysian 370 contact 12 decimal 9. Good night. >> Breaking news tonight. A Malaysia Airlines flight with [music] 239 people on board, including four Americans, has gone missing. Even as these grainy [music] satellite images released today by the Chinese government >> again the Malaysian flight [music] too was a was one shot at China saying knock it up. >> Why shoot it down though if it's not hostile? Our technologies permit us to manipulate time [music] and space. >> They need distance annihilated. >> This country [music] is very powerful. Far more powerful than people understand. [music] We have weaponry that nobody has any idea what it is. And it is the most powerful weapons in the world. Not even close. >> I remember the line from [music] the Hindu scripture Vishnu. is trying to persuade the prince that [music] he should do his duty and to impress him. Takes on his multi-armed form and says, "Now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds." [music] I suppose life want that. >> Let's go, Chad. One way or another. >> [music] >> OMG, welcome to the live stream, guys. Thank you so much for being here. You all want to know about free energy. That's why you're hanging out. That's why I got the white shirt on today, chat. Um, sort of a rule, by the way, if you want to talk about free energy, the way that to be most credible is actually not to wear a suit or to dress up. The way you want to be most credible is you wear a white plain white t-shirt with, of course, deep V. You got to show off the goods, chat. Honestly, pardon me. If I was a woman, we'd already have full disclosure at this point. That is just the way our society is. In fact, I've been considering going full VTuber. I don't know what that entails, but essentially instead of seeing me, you would see an anime girl. Now, you would also not hear my voice. My voice and my likeness would be translated in real time into an anime girl, but everything that I say would still be exactly the same. I'm pretty sure this would boost my engagement at least two to five times. Pretty cringe. pretty messed up. Kind of makes me want to blow my brains out. It's a joke. It's a joke, chat. Okay, let's get to it. First, you must suffer through my political takes once more. I'm going to leave Ian Carol alone. He gets a pass for tonight. But I am going to harp on this Lindsay Clancy thing because a it is hilarious. The X stream is messed up. They messed. They did something to the extremes, guys. Let me check it. No, it looks normal. Looks fine. Okay, focus. Attention, guys. Lindsay [clears throat] Clancy, new update. If you've been living under a rock, this is, by the way, important for all of us. If you've been living under a rock, a [snorts] woman named Lindsay Clancy murdered her three children by strangling them to death. And the court case has been politically divided because an online movement of drunk wine moms and assorted other degenerates, mostly leftists, but not exclusively. have decided that the system failed Lindsay or that the drugs did it to her that she was prescribed that she asked for that she tried to get and that she got too much help. she had too much help and therefore all the help is what caused her to do this and that she's not culpable for her own actions which if you're being honest if I'm being honest right now this is actually the thing that triggers me more than anything else out there if you want to trigger Ashton Forbes then do something horrible and have no accountability show no accountability for it and to amplify that like amplifying the jackpot you add in social media movements, virtue signaling movements, and now we've reached full-blown hysteria. Okay, you're all caught up. The funniest possible thing just happened, chat. Let's Let's experience it together in real time. >> I'm I'm curious about >> Oh. Oh, okay. I did I forgot to tell you. Okay. And so there was just a hung jury, meaning there was one hold out that prevented her from getting off. As in the one hold out was the one that was, "Nah, this is murder." And all 11 other jurors had decided that she was innocent by means of insanity, 100%. Okay, I I can't believe it either. And as you expect, right-wing Twitter is rightfully making fun of this situation because it's 11 Karens 11 Karens basically trying to tell one sane guy that a murderer should walk free. And he's like, nah, he's not being gaslit. And so the memes have been amazing as you would expect. The Chuds are winning. The Chads are winning too. Everybody's winning except for women right now. So now you're caught up to speed. So there has been a now a growing movement to dox and ruin the guy's life that held back a murderer from going free from instead of going to real prison going to like maybe a soft institution okay for triple murder of her own children little children. Let's see how the witch trial against the juror is going, guys. They're doing fullblown daytime TV interviews to try to ruin this guy's life. Get this. >> The jurors themselves because we know it was nine women, three men. What was the age range? What was the racial makeup? I haven't heard any of that. What was it? >> Um 70 in 70ish to 22. Mhm. >> And um one person of color and then everybody else was white. Um a lot of the jurors had children. >> Uhhuh. And >> one person of color was a person of color a woman or a man? >> A man. >> A man. Is a hold out juror a person of a black man? >> Yes. >> A black man is a holdout juror? >> Yes. Well, I have to sit with that for just a second. [laughter] What the hell is this real? This is why I don't have TV, guys. This is why I don't have TV. If you have TV, you are being brainwashed. First of all, why are we even asking like the racial jur and then you It's almost like she had the six sense chat. Did you see it? She had a little bit of the six sense. She's like, "What was the racial makeup? Wait, was the hold out juror black?" And it was like she just knew. It dawned upon her the harsh reality. Have we been witch hunting a black man this whole time? And the best part is when she finds out yes, it changes her whole world view. She's like, "Wait a minute. Do I have to change my opinion now?" I'm what? A lot of you are saying, "Who cares?" Exactly. That's what's so crazy. I never once considered my opinion of Lindsay Clancy based on the racial makeup of anybody involved. Her husband could have been black for all I knew. I didn't have any idea. I never even seen a picture of the guy. And this just shows the difference. I make my decisions based on logic and facts, not based on identity, politics, the racial makeup of people, whether or not the the husband was a Leo or if he was a Cancer or whatever the heck he was. Gemini. Oh, you know his bags. He was a Gemini. >> [snorts] >> Jesus. These people literally make up their decisions based on what the group think is. Oh, wait. I have to agree with black people. I forgot. I forgot I have to agree with black people. Um, you know what? Maybe maybe she is guilty. [laughter] What? I have to sit with this for a while. It's just actually crazy. [laughter] How is this world we live in? And some of you guys may say, "Nah, this isn't real." Cuz I would say this isn't real. But I've said that about a lot of things. I didn't think teleportation was real either. A lot of you guys think I'm a grifter or something like that. No. I didn't think teleportation was real. I didn't think free energy was real. Of course, I didn't think that stuff was real. And then you see this. I actually don't even know if I want to play this. It's just like it's scary. Well, well, I'll put I'll play something up uplifting right after this for you guys because this is this is something that's honestly it's hard to tell if some of this is parody. We're actually at the point where I can't tell the difference between trolling and actually just people being straight up honest anymore. The line's too blurred. Here you go. You you guys decide. Is this person being serious or not? >> The hold out juror in the Lindsey Clancy trial was a black man. And I'm not going to share any opinions cuz I'm not a person of color. I am a nonpracticing white. Um I'm surprised it changes the landscape of the conversation a little bit. And I think a lot of us were assuming that it was a white man. The hold out juror in the Lindsy Clancy trial was a black man. And I'm not going to share any opinions because I'm not a person of color. I am a nonpracticing white. Um >> I'm a nonpracticing white chat. I'm a nonpracticing white. >> [clears throat] >> You know what I I mean what are we trying to convey there exactly? What are we trying to convey to people when we say I'm a nonpracticing white? Oh, I'm with you colored people. [laughter] I feel like these people are definitely more racist than than anybody else, right? Like if you see race as everything like this where like you have to say [laughter] if you feel compelled to say you're a nonpracticing white I'm pretty sure you're racist. I'm pretty sure that's the most racist thing I've ever heard. You realize that the people that they think are racist like they'll be like Ashton you're a racist. I'll be like I don't ever think about race at all. Like you think about race way more than me. Doesn't that make you more racist? Wow. Okay, guys. Blackpilling chat. Blackpilling. I saw people replying to this going, "I wish the CIA would just orb me like they did MH370." Thank you. That's what I've been praying for for like two years. I do these live streams because they keep me alive. They keep me alive. chat. If I don't if I stop talking about this, it's gonna you're gonna hear I see a newspaper article like sad St. Paul man walked into the river and floated away like what? Yeah, just decided he wanted to go swimming in the river. Stupid idea. Now he's gone. It's like oh man chat. That's how you know the CIA got me chat. You'll hear something completely implausible and it'll just get presented as if it was just totally normal. Okay, [clears throat] this is actually they found they actually found the juror. The conservatives, the right-wing media found the juror, actually. >> So, I'm not going to >> um they found an old clip of him. You can't believe this, Chad. Here you go. >> Here you go. >> The people in America are not settled with the information that's been given to us right now. >> So, I'm not going to be lining up taking a shot or a vaccination for something that wasn't clear in the first place. And then you all create a shot in miraculous time. It takes years to create vaccination. >> Well, it used to take years. >> Okay. It used to >> you know how you know how many years were invested in this in this approach? About 20 years of science. >> This is chat. My favorite video from CO and it's not even close. This is way up there. The number two video is probably that Canadian guy going on a rant saying how CO was going to go down. This one is the best because you have to understand all of the context that's going on in this video. The libtards spent all this money to push this scop propaganda, this this pandemic where everybody's dying and it was all an illusion, all fake. And so they spent all this money to do this production to go to the ghetto, to go to the hood in like Baltimore or some [ __ ] like that with Anthony Fouchy. And they've got all the cameras on this guy. They ambush this guy. They must have been like, "Hey, are you going to be okay talking to us here? We got cameras on you. You got like a dozen people on you. Everybody's going to peer pressure you." And Anthony Fouch's gaslighting him here, too. Gaslighting him in his face in real time. and he's still pushing back and he's not melting down. He's not collapsing. He's not having a panic attack like some people would with a camera on them in a situation with this much pressure on them. It's just the most beautiful video that I've ever seen related to CO. I'm going to let the man continue, but I'm going to help him out here. So Anthony Fouchy says, he says, "Hey, you've never made a vaccine in this short period of time." And Anthony Fouchy tries to reply and say, "Oh, but we've improved the methodology. You mean you're you're basically he's gaslighting him there?" Because what he's really saying is, "Oh, we're using this new methodology, this mRNA methodology, and we're pretending like it's safe by bypassing all the original regulations." Like, he doesn't even address the guy's real concern that all the other vaccines we waited for years to see what the outcomes were. And this we're saying, "Nope, we're going to bypass all that." He's like, "No, well, we we also changed the methodology." That doesn't make it safer. That makes it more dangerous. You definitely shouldn't be rushing it then. That's what's so crazy about how they lie. And he does it with just a straight face. No shame whatsoever. Like at least when Candace Owens lies to your face for money, which she does on a regular, she she kind of does it with a smirk, right? Like she knows she's lying. Anthony Fouchi is coldblooded. This guy's has a job. He has a mission and he's just going to straight lie and that's it. Unbelievable to get us to be >> 20 years is not enough and 9 months is definitely not enough for nobody to be taking no vaccination that you all came up with. >> The only >> Exactly, dude. Nine. You don't have to have a PhD to understand 9 months is not enough time to be taking no vaccinations that you just created with a new methodology. That's not enough time. And that's why I didn't take the test. You guys are insane, by the way. This is my personal opinion just in case this gets out, which it will. This is my personal opinion, but you're insane if you were like, "Oh, yeah, just sign me up for that. Yeah, everybody tells me I need this." Okay, no thank you. >> Reason I'm talking to you right now. >> And then it's not just that. It's like, "Okay, you want to do it? Great." But you're trying to peer pressure me into it into something that you think is safe. Great. You think it's safe, buddy. Take two of them. Take three if that makes you feel good. I'm not I'm not bothered by you taking drugs that you say are going to protect you from a virus. What I'm bothered by is now you're trying to get me to do it. Now you're saying I have to do it. That's where I draw the line. That's where I'm going to need a lot of evidence and I'm going to have to be 100% sure myself. Whether or not you think it's fine, I don't really care. Your opinion means very little to me. Very, very little. as close as we are is that I've been vaccinated. But if it allow thousands of people like you don't get vaccinated, you're going to let this virus continue to percolate in this country and in this world. >> Something like Okay. Okay. Again, this is just like the biggest thing. If you say the vi the vaccine gives you immunity, then you should have no fear whatsoever of me getting it. At that point, your only argument is, well, what about the few people that can't get the vaccine? Well, [ __ ] them. Sorry. Sorry. I'm not gonna risk my life because of some old person that can't get a vaccine vaccine. That's just, you know what, that's the luck of the draw for them. Good luck. They better just pray. Okay, guys. So, the part of the whole point here was that they knew it's not giving them immunity. And it's not. We find out later that it's not actually giving them immunity. It's like 90% chance of getting immunity. Like [laughter] what? People are people who got the shots are getting it again, getting COVID again. And that's why this guy's next point is so important. >> Like the common flu then, right? >> It's like the common flu then, right? If you can get the vaccine and then you can still get the virus or get the virus next year, the new version of it, then it's kind of like the flu, isn't it? And you're now what are we really trying to do now? You're peer pressuring me against multiple shots of untested tests of vaccinations that don't even necessarily work. What? To help the community? >> Okay, man. >> That's more serious than the flu. >> Well, the flu kills a lot of people annually, too. >> You know how many people died of the flu the last year? I mean, not this year, virtually none, but the previous year, about 20 to 30,000. You know how many people have died from COVID 19 in the United States? 600,000 Americans. >> All lies. Nobody died from the flu. It was a miracle. How can you even say this with a straight face, dude? 60,000 people died the year before from the flu. That year, none. None. And oh, 600,000 people died from COVID. [ __ ] [ __ ] Do you guys realize how many people this is? They're actually claiming that like millions of people died from COVID. Do you guys realize how many people that is? There's only 300 million people in all of America. If two million people died, every single person would know people personally that died from COVID. Everyone would. It would be one degree of freedom for everyone. Do you know how they faked the numbers? I'm going tell you straight up right now how they faked the numbers. It was easy to do. All they did was group together all of the death certificates where COVID was anywhere on any of them. That was it. That it was literally that simple. Do you know how much that inflated the deaths? Exactly as it did. [laughter and gasps] And it's pretty simple. So if you died from a heart attack, if you died from a liver mistr medical malpractice, if you died from a car accident, if you had a COVID test that said you were positive, you died from COVID. The test when the metrics that this guy is saying are the people that died from COVID is not what you think of as people dying from COVID. Very, very few people actually died from a co virus. Very, very few. Probably equivalent to about the flu. It was mostly just old people. You know, the amount of young the amount of people that were like ablebodied that died from COVID is practically none. Practically none. You be you would probably more likely to be struck by lightning. That's how low it is in reality. That's how clown show this was. >> Well, you Well, that Well, the number that you all are giving that died, that's that's once again that's you all's number. >> You going to pay us. Yeah, definitely. >> Because when you start talking about paying people to get vaccinated, when you start talking about incentivizing things to get people vaccinated, it's something else going on with that. >> Something something else going on. >> It is something going on with something else. You're right. But I'm glad millions of people like me and most everybody here didn't get. You know what their incentive was? Protecting their health and protecting the city. But I >> Exactly. They played on their emotions. They made you afraid and played on your emotions and they tricked you into doing something that was against your self-interest. That's what she's saying right there. >> It's okay cuz my my my campaign is about fear. It's about inciting fear in people. You all attack people with fear. That's what this pandemic is. It's a fear. It's fear. This pandemic, that's all it is. >> That's exactly what it is. And that's what it was. And here's the part the next part about it. [clears throat] Why would they do this? You would say because they're idiots. Because government's full of morons. Because the number one thing government needs to be is trusted in control of the situation. We don't actually have to do the right thing. That's not what's important for the government. What's important is that the government's at the helm, that you're listening, doing what the government says, and that you're taking the approved government information. That's what's important. And that cycle of perverse incentives is what led to the COVID cycling out of control to the point where people had full-blown mass formation psychosis. I had multiple family members not invite me to holidays, Christmas, Thanksgiving because I didn't get the COVID shot. Think about how crazy that is. how much brainwashing and psychological power that is to scare people to the degree to convince them that their own family members and loved ones shouldn't be around them. That is that's sick. And that's what the government cares about. They just care about being in control. Doesn't matter if what's right, what's true, what's wrong. And it goes to show you most people just want to be led. Most people don't have an inner monologue. Most people are just following the herd. just following the sheep, [snorts] you know, same even in the in the conspiracy circles are not different. A lot of you in the conspiracy circles may say, "Oh, I'm smarter than this. I always distrust the government." Actually, a lot of people in those circles have the exact same problem. You're just being a contrarian, but also doing the same thing, still following the herd. That's why if you want to be a true high IQ futurist, you have to be able to think for yourself. You don't just listen to your streamer. You don't always agree with your streamer. You don't always disagree. You don't always agree or disagree with people that you don't like either. You pull in information and you make the best possible decision that you can given the evidence. Okay. Are we ready for the main event? Let me see what else we got. Okay. One more two uh a couple things I want to mention here before we get into the free energy stuff. [clears throat] A lot of people keep asking me about John Hutchinson. If you don't know the lore, John Hutchinson was a garage builder in the 90s. And he was supposedly producing anti-gravity. Supposedly producing anti-gravity, if we boil it down, via some electromagnetic means. And everybody, I think, wants me to look into it because they think, oh, well, I imagine they think, well, maybe there's some secret sauce we can find there. We've looked at it, not deeply, but here's the thing is that I don't think there's anything to learn that we can find out there that we haven't already figured out. There is stuff to learn, but we've already figured it out, and we've pushed past that point with zero energy. I'm not so much interested in interesting or spooky stories. I'm more interested in figuring out exactly how things work. And I think that's why a lot of you watch as well is that the analysis that we do here on this show, we dig deep into what is the root cause of this? And what we've been digging into is not just is free energy real, but more of how how do you produce it? How can it be real? How can we explain it with physics? And in a perfect world, how do we engineer something that would convince people How do we engineer? And then we do this. Why? Because we're trying to push this along faster. We're trying to make disclosion disclosure happen faster. And I want to thank real quick voice for good for this super chat. We'll get back to it later. Appreciate you, good sir. Um, we're trying to speed along this process because the moment you realize that free energy is real, you say, "Holy crap. Well, everybody thinks it's fake. You think this is must be a major major psychological operation. This is a psychological issue that we have to deal with here. This is the kind of situation we say, "Okay guys, here's the free energy device. Here we go. Everybody believes now. Nah, man. That's like trying to convince all of Candace Owens followers that yeah, it was Tyler Robinson." Does that seem like something that's possible to you guys? Oh, yeah. Oh, they're g let me if you they're gonna reveal some footage during the court case and they're gonna have Tyler Robinson, you know, shooting him. I'm just making this up hypothetically. Would that you think all of a sudden going to be like, "Oh, yeah, we all agree." No, of course not. Same is true as free energy. Even if you show people a free energy uh, you know, magnetic motor, even free energy microchips, people aren't going to believe it. They won't believe it until their phone is charging forever. And the only reason why they'll believe it then is because they use their phone every day and they'll be undeniable. I just don't have to plug this in, I guess, and must be using free energy. Then they'll come up with some other way to rationalize it. I guarantee you. So, the reason why I don't look too much into the John Hutchinson situation is because there isn't I don't think there's much more to learn. If anyone disagrees and I'm open to more information, but let me know. I think we've moved beyond that with like the Ferris Williams looking at the connection to torque and spin to couple uh electromagnetism and gravity together. So what we need to find out is what is the mechanism by which we tap in to the zero point energy to the free energy so to speak. Okay, [sighs] it's 911. So, I do want to just say also for Charlie Kirk yesterday as well. I'm not really big on, you know, we're not going to do a moment of silence or anything, but I do want to express condolences for everybody who was lost in 911 and for Charlie Kirk because I didn't really know Charlie Kirk before that, but the more I've learned about him after that, I can see that beyond any doubt, he would have been president one day. And he would have been president one day for sure. I'd have voted for him over anybody we have right now. Think about that. and he was assassinated. Terrible. Last thing before we dig into it is Dyson spheres. We should be more surprised that we don't see Dyson spheres everywhere. Where are all the Dyson spheres? Where are all the aliens? If it is true that Elon Musk is right and that solar power is going to be 100% of our energy someday has to be. That's where all the energy is coming from. I swear chat if it turns out Elon Musk somehow knew about zero point energy then this is the worst humiliation ritual I've ever seen. This is worse than Puff Daddy putting on a dress and walking around Time Square. This is just straight up embarrassing because it's clear his world view. Elon Musk's worldview is that sun is where all the energy is ultimately coming from on our planet, which is so dumb because it kind of ignores fusion and and uh fish, like the ability for us to create fusion and fish, thinking that all the energy is going to come from the sun, that all of it's going to be solar, and then we're going to trap it like a Dyson sphere. If that was the case and that was true, we should see Dyson spheres everywhere because anywhere where there's an intelligent civilization, Elon Musk is saying that's the end goal. You can't get any better than that. And yet we look around in the sky and we've been looking for decades and we don't see the signs of even one Dyson sphere. They had a couple tabby star. The last time last time I looked at its happy star, I think was about 2018. They should have had many more transits, I think, since then to be able to determine if it really was a Dyson sphere. I'm guessing it's not. So, the reason why we're not seeing Dyson spheres is because they're wrong. Elon Musk is wrong, too. That should be the conclusion, but we don't reach that conclusion because we don't quite understand physics at the moment as humans. We're missing something big. We're missing an extra dimension. We call it the zero point energy. You can argue with AI right now. AI will say, "Oh, it's the lowest ground state. Therefore, you can't extract energy." And you say, "Well, but you can because the Casemir effect shows we can extract that energy." And it goes, "Well, but that's not a repeatable process." And you say, "Yeah, but you said that we couldn't extract the energy, and we can extract the energy. So, it's not the ground state, is it?" This is what they get wrong. And I'm going to be 100% clear about this for the physicists that want to challenge it. The ground state is just the equilibrium state. It's not the actual ground state. The ground state is down here. Us and our reality, we're up here, but we're up here. They call it the false vacuum because it's false. It's fake. The true vacuum is down here. The kasmir effect works because it taps into the zero point energy just like this. Okay. So the question is not whether or not you can tap into the zero point energy. That's already been proven. The question is can we pull this 0 point energy out in a system and yank more energy out than it took to pull that energy out. That's the engineering question about free energy about over unity about zero point energy. So what does overity mean? Overunity simply means if I take a system you could call it an engine but any system think about it like an engine to be to be for to be simple. Can I get more energy out than the amount of energy I put in to keep that system going? That's free energy. If you had a system like that, you would getting you would be getting perpetual energy out of it and it would run forever. So that is free energy. So over unity is free energy. And now the line starts to blur when we get to fusion because we get to fusion and fusion produces over unity. But it uses up atoms. Not really. It doesn't destroy the atoms, but it fuses them into new atoms and we get the energy out of it. So, it kind of gets around it in a different way. Now, I'm not saying we're doing fusion like that and that's where the energy is coming. I'm saying we're straight up tapping into an extra reservoir. That's the only way, the absolute only way that over unity and free energy can be possible is that we tap in to another energy source. Okay, [snorts] I already know about Garrett Modell. I've emailed with him. I think he might be a little adverse because I kind of told him that his buddy Pudof and Charles Chase like definitely know like definitely definitely know. [snorts] No question, they know. And he's good friends with them. I didn't realize he was like good good friends with them. So I might be playing home wrecker a little bit, chat. I'm sure he doesn't believe me over his good friends, but I'm just saying how Pudof and Charles Chase definitely know in a way that Garrett Mell doesn't quite understand. I don't think it's okay. Okay, I think we're ready for it. [snorts] It's time. Actually, let's do the over Unity machine. Now, I'm gonna show you guys a video here of an overn device. It's not one that I built. Some guy named Don built it. And uh this video is where I got a picture that everybody kind of like rips on me because I was given this photo that was from this video and I thought it was this actual device that we were building and it turned out to be this other device. It's very similar. Very, very similar. Slightly different. I'll say orientation is as far as I'll go, but same idea. And this is a Hatam configuration. Hatam was the guy that developed this overunity magnetic motor configuration. There's several different overunity magnetic motor configurations. John Sirill is another one. Um, but they all do the same thing and they all have the same underlying basis, which is what I just told you is that there is this other energy source that we can tap into that we can pull energy out of the ether, whatever you want to call it. And they all use magnetism and spin and resonance. Every single one of them, they all use all the exact same things. So, let's watch one of the videos. Uh, maybe I can do it like this, actually. I [snorts] think if I share it this way, I can speed it up as opposed to just skipping along because it's like 10 minutes long and we don't really need to watch the whole thing because it's just a thing spinning around, right? Yeah. Here we go. Okay. So, here it is. I even called it over Unity device. Whatever. This was the full video because the full video was found on YouTube. I think it's been taken down. It could still be out there. I don't even really know. But this video is still out there. There's a lot of overunity devices, but this one is actually extremely compelling this video because you can see all the meters and you can clearly see over unity on the meters. The only question in this video is okay. Well, they cheating somehow, right? So, it's just I mean that's it. Did somebody make a fake video and a fake magnetic motor using the HAOM setup and and try to deceive you somehow behind the scenes? I mean, you can decide. It's a 9m minutee long video where they start the whole thing up and they turn it down. So it would be pretty hard to fake this. It's not impossible of course. And this is where people I think you see these people will say, "Well, hey, this is possible." Like they'll say, "Ashen, don't you think it's possible the government killed Charlie Kirk?" And I say, "Yeah, I think it's possible." They're like, "Well, why are you against it then?" Because that's not what happened. Because there's no evidence for it, right? You say, "Ashen, isn't it possible there's a secretly a battery and a secretly somebody faked this?" Yeah, it's possible. There's no evidence for that, though. Well, for what gives you that reason? Because this is impossible. Well, that's not a reason for why this is fake. Same reason why people go against the videos. Like, don't you think it's possible somebody made the videos? Yeah, in theory, like, somebody could have, but no, they didn't. Don't you get it? Like, just because something's possible doesn't mean it happened. And it doesn't mean it's an equal footing with other theories either. This is what I think people confuse. is they think that all ideas are equal. They're not. You can have whatever ideas you want, but not all ideas are equal, man. There are ideas that are stupid ideas, and there are ideas that are smart ideas that are based on logic and facts and reason. And hopefully, if you guys are a follower of mine, you understand the difference. >> So, we're going to do another demonstration for you device. And um I've got kind of a closeup today. And that is uh so that you can pay attention to meters here. I have them up front with a head shot on them so that you can read them throughout the duration of the demonstration and see that I'm in fact achieving over me on the left shows will show the amount of power being consumed by the system in the middle of power produced and this right here shows the amount of power in the battery. So, uh, just to walk you through the system here quickly, uh, this rotor on the right motor, which the household current here on the left is magnetic to my alternator. They're not touching each other. They're just magnetic influence here is what causes them to work in unison. Uh reason I'm using magnetic rotors instead of gears or belts is that um with gears and belts I would get just merely a transfer of motion. But with magnetic >> Oh, is the sound messed up? Yeah, sound might be messed up. Um hold on. Let me see if I can reshare this. Yeah, I think the sound got messed up when I shared it with this. Hold on. Let me see if I can share this correctly. Oh, yeah. Yeah, the sound is broken. Hold on. Okay, this will be better. rotors, I'm actually a able to achieve um sorry guys uh energy production and uh part of the load that would otherwise be um on the motor itself is relieved and so I am able to produce more power than I'm consuming uh because of these magnetic rotors which are doing some of the work. So, um, ideally I would have a number of rotors lined up here, uh, with an alternator on each, all in line and all working in unison so that I produced much more power than I'm going to do in this demonstration. I just wanted to build a small system here just to demonstrate principle and show you how it worked. >> So, this is absolutely the hadom configuration. No question. Hadom configuration even adds more. So, this is a modular setup where you can add more and more and more to increase the power gain that you're getting as well. Um, I'm going to redo the beginning just so you can he he explains what the meters are just in case you guys didn't hear it. >> Tight shot on them so that uh you can read them throughout the duration of the demonstration and uh see that I am in fact achieving over unity. Uh the meter here on the left shows will show the amount of power being consumed by the system. Meter in the middle will show the amount of power being produced and this meter on the right here shows the amount of power in the amount of voltage in the battery. Um, okay, here we go. >> Produced is in voltage in my So, if I turn the inverter on, which I have two 100 watt light bulbs plugged into, you can see that um the alarm goes off on my inverter and that is uh because I don't have enough voltage in my battery. I basically have a battery here. So, there's not enough power in it to um operate the inverter. I need >> That's annoying sound. My bad. >> And turn the system on just to uh [clears throat] build up a little bit. >> Game on. the battery enough to operate the inverter. So, um you can see once the uh >> it's free energy time, bad boys. >> Alternator gets up to speed. >> Okay, >> the voltage will start to increase in the battery >> sound. >> Once it runs here for few seconds, I'll have enough power in the >> Okay, so I want to point out too, a lot of people don't they think, oh, your thing's connected to a battery. Yes. Like if a free energy device wasn't connected to a battery, I would be concerned. How how do you think it's going to operate without being connected to a capacitor of some sort? The whole point of a capacitor is that's where you store the charge, right? So, there's going to definitely be a battery. And this is why people like, "Oh, they found a battery connected to it. Your free energy device has been debunked." You're like, "Okay, you're a [ __ ] You don't understand. You don't understand electricity." Jesus, chat. And honestly, people don't understand electricity. They really don't. I didn't understand it either at one point. >> Battery to operate the inverter. So, you can see here the the power in the battery will start to climb quickly. Tells me there's residual power enough to operate the inverter. I turn the inverter on. Got my 200 watt light bulbs plugged into it. So, you can see uh the amount of power here being consumed by the system is 117 volts at 1.15 amps. And uh amount of power being uh produced is uh 118 volts at 1.59 amps. So uh we have over unity and then uh >> so is there any [ __ ] questions? Pardon my French. I think that was pretty goddamn clear if you ask me. The amount of energy being used is this one right here. Wait, why can't I read it? 90 or something and the one being produced 186. 186 is a bigger number than 90 something. Do you know that? Do you know that 100 is bigger than 90? Crazy dog. Pretty clear. I can't believe people were attacking me over this, saying I was proven wrong over this. I watch this and I go, you can literally just watch these videos. Dude explains it point by point. The only way this can be fake is if he's actually fake. This is an elaborate hoax that this guy set up. It would be a pretty damn weird elaborate hoax. Hey, I built an elaborate Hatam machine and then I did some magic behind magician tricks behind the scenes to make it look like in real time while I was recording that it was showing over Unity while the meters are changing too. So, we would have to have a different setup in the background changing the meters. This is where I say like people are like, "Oh, he could be faking it." I'm like, "How? How do you think he's faking?" And people like, "They can do anything. They can pull anything off." It's like, "But no, explain to me actually how you literally think he's faking it. Give me a plausible explanation for how he faked it." Well, he plugged it into a battery. That's not going to count for what's going on with these meters here. >> Let it run here for a bit. So, >> this is the only reasonable question, and I had it as well. Maybe he's not showing you where the meters are connect. What do you think it's connected to? He tells you what they're connected to. But that's the point. The only way it could even theoretically be fake is if the meters aren't connected to the things he's saying they are. They're connected to something else entirely, right? That would be the only way. It's theoretically possible. >> So that you can see that the um power in the battery, it's going to just ever so slowly just increase in voltage. >> I'm going to speed it up. demonstrate that uh I'm not just simply bleeding power off with the battery which I can face when I started. So um let it run here for 15 minutes and you can watch in this volage of the battery as it gradually increases. >> Okay, make it go faster. >> What the hell? What did I just do? That's as fast as it goes. Okay. Well, we'll just skip ahead then. So, you can see it's increasing, right? Bigger numbers are good. And then just because, you know, some people aren't convinced. This is why people are like, "Hey, I'll mute it here." >> All right. So, I think we run around here long enough. You can see that power is being >> This is why people are like, "Hey, just build something." I'm like, "Why would I build something? Look at this guy." Yeah. This would be a terrible hoax. How would you make money from this? Exactly. Like you're actually just showing a proof of principle. This isn't even like something where you're like, "Hey, buy my machine here." You're like, "Hey, I'm just showing you guys how free energy works. Like here it is." And so I'm like, "Why would I build something when this guy built something? He shows it on YouTube." If I built something and did this, I would have a million people attacking me. I would get attacked. The matrix would come down upon me 100%. Because they did when I started to try to do this. The matrix came down upon me. This is how they can control it. And trust me, you don't really feel it until you're under the gun. Then you're like, whoa. You're like, this is not organic. The way people are reacting to all of this. All I did was just show a real free energy device >> produced is greater than the amount of power being consumed. And I'm slowly building up power in the battery. Uh so, uh going to shut it off here. >> We're going to turn it off >> and see how the uh power in the battery is quickly consumed since there wasn't really much. >> Look how look how quickly the battery starts to go down here. >> And to the point where the alarm will go off here. my inverter as soon as we get under 10 and a half volts. And the uh there it goes. So, shut that off. And um so, thank you for watching. So, he leaves the alternator on, right? He leaves the alternator on, the battery gets drained down at the end, and then he turns the alternator off at the end, right? So, I mean, if you tell me he's not got those things plugged into the things he says, then how come they all power on at the exact right moment based on what's really happening on the screen on the on the device? There's a second device somewhere else that he's got it plugged into to fake the fake the m the the meters. Pretty compelling to me. You guys want to see the full levitation video, too, since we just LK99 since we're just full conspirator tonight. This isn't necessarily free energy. I didn't even know what superconductivity was when I first saw this video. When I first saw this video, I had no idea what the Meisner effect was, flux pinning, or superconductivity. When I first looked at this video, I said, "Is that how UFOs fly?" I mean, doesn't it look exactly as how UFOs have been depicted to fly around? Certainly makes you wonder right away. This is another video where I just cannot understand how anyone could have faked this or why they would have faked this. This video came out right during LK99. This was before I was on the scene with MH370. LK99 was the summer beforehand. s high temperature room temperature superconductor solid state. There's no liquid nitrogen on that thing. It's just floating freely. The reason why this is huge is because imagine how cheap a fusion reactor becomes if you have a room temperature superconductors confining it. Now that we've learned what we've learned, now that we've powerle leveled ourselves up to Super Saiyan or maybe even close to Ultra Instinct at this point, now that we've gotten that high a power level, we look back at this and we say, "Oh, I know why they had to cover this up. They had to cover this up because this makes fusion reactors like trivial." And part of the problem with fusion reactors, we're going to get to over fusion reactor, but now the issue is going to be how efficient can you make the fusion reactor. One of the best ways to make the fusion reactor more efficient is that your superconductors don't need to be cooled anymore. That saves a lot of energy cost, like a lot. Probably the number one energy input into the fusion reactor other than the production of the actual fusion reactor itself. Right? So that right there, that's a national sec. This is a national security issue right here, chat. [laughter] This is why this is why we're doing felony physics tonight, chat. you watch. This is the only place you're going to see free legit free energy devices and metam materials that the national security apparatus like made go away. He does a loop around it. He does I'm like why is he doing when I first watched this I was like why is he doing a loop around it? This is so weird. Now that I know he's like he's telling people this ain't fake dude. Imagine how hard that would be to fake what he just did right there. He's like now this isn't a video about science. This is now a video about trying to fool people. Think about that. And he even and to even really prove it, he takes a nail, a screw, and he puts the screw to show you that's really a magnet. And the funny part is he doesn't there's no words on this. All this information is being conveyed solely by what the guy is doing in the video, which tells you this video was intended to be a video to show the public. This was a leak. This was somebody showing this saying, "Hey, we're just going to put this this on the on the internet and people are going to be able to tell what's going on without any context whatsoever. It's literally a dude showing it recording a screen, right?" And you look at this and you go, "Oh, well, now I know why." Because that's a room temperature superconductor and he's showing they already have it 100%. It's showing full levitation. That's full levitation. And you can tell because we he jiggles it. Why does he jiggle it? He jiggles it because he wants to show you it's real flux pinning, not visual effects. If that was not full levitation, you would not see the full flux pinning and the jiggle where it moves with the object. But it's not perfect. It's not perfect because the material is not perfect either, but it's pretty damn good. I mean, it's full levitation for sure. So why does he jiggle it here? He wants to show you it's stuck there. Like it's actual flux pinning. Nobody's even seen flux pinning in the real world before this. This is like seeing teleportation for the first time. Look at that. That jiggle is As somebody that loves physics. Yeah, we chat. We love the jiggle. You know what I'm saying? Ladies, you know what I'm saying? Guys, you know what I'm saying? You know what I'm saying? Oh, and the loop. Okay, that's enough. Let's have Tom Bearden explain free energy to us chat. Then let's go about our weekends and forget about everything and go eat our steak and plug ourselves back into the Matrix, do some Tik Toks. Uh, you know, watch our sports balls. It's very big sports ball day on Sunday, chat. I can't wait. I'm going to put my uh put my jersey on, cheer for my sports ball team playing against my least favorite sports ball team. Free energy room temperature superconductors. That's for nerds. It's for nerds, chat. Okay. Tom Bearden, the absolute goat. Just absolute goat. Wait, which video is it? Hold on. I had to write it down. I have so many Tom Bearden videos. Nice. This one. >> What we mean by There he is. Look at him. Look at him in his beautiful bald head. his beautiful bald head and his smooth southern accent. I could listen to this man for days on end, guys. Tom Bearden clearly [snorts] was a black project engineer. I don't need to guess. I don't need to even speculate. I know for sure 100% this dude was working on black projects. And I'm not being racist here. I'm speaking about special access programs for the government, for the military, to build super weapons, to build weapons that let us dunk on China, Russia, Iran, really anybody, any and everybody using this technology, maintaining an asymmetrical advantage. What does that mean? That means we don't tell the public about this cuz we use this to make sure that nobody else can do what we can do. And if we tell the public about this, then our adversaries can do gravity manipulation. And that's bad. That's the reason why they hide it. Love it, hate it, it is what it is. Tom Bearden clearly knew because this is not a man who's lying. I played a lot of poker in my days. There's some people I can't really tell about. This is somebody I can tell about. There is no chance Tom Bearden is lying here. He could be wrong, but he's not lying. equilibrium conditions and non-equilibrium and entropy and negative entropy is not really that complicated but it's an area where a mystique has grown around it ban this person right now chat just okay entropy what the hell does entropy mean nobody knows Tom Bearden tell us >> because they really struggled for a hundred years to properly express things Some of them they're still struggling with. But basically, let's start with entropy. What we mean with entropy, it originally was just dissipated potential. That's all it was. And it meant I'm dissipating some energy that the system previously had under its control and could use. It now no longer has that much energy. And all that entropy is is a measure of that energy that got out of that's out of your control. Maybe you used it to power the load or maybe it went out in losses or whatever, but you lost control of it and you can no longer use it. You didn't destroy the energy. It's still out there, but uh you can't use it anymore in the >> That is such a simple explanation. So, first thing we have to do is we have to level set what even is entropy? When we're talking about thermodynamics, what are we talking about? When we're talking about an engine, we're talking about a system. What exactly are we talking about? When we're talking about entropy, we're saying, "Hey, I've got this box here. Imagine this screen as a box filled with energy. This energy is going to get dissipated. You're going to lose a little bit of this energy over time. You might use it to power things, to do things. It might just get lost due to inefficiency and leak away." But that is entropy. This is the second law of thermodynamics. The second law of thermodynamics says you're always going to have increasing entropy. Therefore, no system can be 100% efficient. You're always going to lose a little energy outside these boxes or you're going to use the energy to power something. And if you do that, you lose energy in your system. So, that's entropy. Anyone want to guess what negative entropy is? Then go ahead and guess in the chat. Tom Bearden's going to tell you. You can you can say you can get a gold star if you guess correctly before Tom Bearden tells you. >> System. That's all entropy is. It's nothing magic, nothing mystical or anything. It's a measure of the energy the system had and could control and use, but it no longer can do that with it. That's how much it's given up. By the same token, if you want to be consistent, negative entropy would be when you give it some more energy which it can control and which it can use because now it has additional energy. So its entropy has decreased from what it just was when it had lost all the other and no replenishment. So but I involved what's called >> negative entropy is just the opposite. You give it more energy than what it had before. Now this is obviously wait a minute. How do you do that? Huh? Well this is what's so important. This is why I try to explain zero point energy. Why am I a zero point energy influencer and not an entropy influencer? Because no one's arguing how entropy works. We need to understand the definition. What we're arguing is is there another energy source by which we can get neg entropy into our system. Okay. Well, before we throw the idea out, let's think about it called a nonequilibrium condition. I actually opened that system. Although they use the term open in a very restricted sense in thermodynamics. I need to change that. But I open that system and I allowed some energy to freely flow in there and the system to catch it free. Once it gets in there, it doesn't matter who furnished the energy. I furnished it, nature furnished it, the vacuum furnished it, whatever furnished it. As far as the system is concerned, I just reduced my entropy because now I have more energy again under my control and I just had a negative entropy operation. So negative entropy is not anything mystical either. It's just the acquisition of by the system of more energy that it does control and use. That's all it is. A measure of that. If you have a system in equilibrium, it's already sunk as low as it can use any energy. All the energy it could use, it's gotten rid of. And it's a condition of maximum entropy. Look at all the energy I had when I wasn't in equilibrium. Now I've lost all of it. So think about how easy this is to understand once I break it down for you guys. A battery is out of equilibrium. At least one that has energy in it. When the battery is run out, when you run out of energy in the battery, what's really happened is the battery is now back in equilibrium. All the positive and all the minus charges are now balanced out again. If you wanted that battery to produce an electricity again, in theory, all you'd have to do is separate the positive and minus charges once again. That would throw it out of equilibrium and then it would try to go back to equilibrium until the energy runs out. That's how electricity works in the real world. That's what electricity is in the real world. A dipole, a separation of positive and minus charge. That's all electricity is. So all we should be trying to do is keep the dipole open. That's what we should be trying to do is the most efficient way to keep the dipole open is going to produce the most electricity. I don't have any more to lose. Maximum entropy. But if I depart from equilibrium, what I mean is I allow this flow now to come in and extra energy exchange that I can grab and use. So I lower the amount that's lost as far as the system is. It now has some extra. So as far as the system is concerned, its entropy decreased. I haven't lost as much now really because I've got all this new replenished. And so I now have it available again. That's all it says. There has been more fuss and fury and raging and absolutism and name calling and everything in the world about entropy and negative entropy and about 95% of it is foolishness. There people who haven't looked at what the concept really means and nothing else. >> This is it. This is also true of the quantum vacuum fluctuations in general. They haven't looked at what it means and they haven't understood what it means. And this is why I challenge any and all academic PhD physicists to debate the topic. I'll win. Nah, I'll win except for I will win. Unlike Gojo or whatever his name is. Uh because here's the thing. When you really boil it down, you realize there's absolutely nothing wrong with the logic. There's not a single flaw in the logic of zero point energy from a physics perspective. The only issue, the absolute only one, is whether or not there really is an extra reservoir of energy. That's the only holdback. And we know there is. So now the only thing holding us back is whether or not we can really produce excess energy from it. we can really tap into it at a lower energy cost than it takes to tap into. That's really the final hurdle. Or you just assume equilibrium. Second law as it's written assumes a system is in equilibrium. It's already reached maximum entropy stage. So um obviously with that if it's if it's in equilibrium and nothing else is ever going to come in the equilibrium is not going to be broke. This is what he's saying. It's so simple to understand. If you have a battery that's run out of energy, it's never going to be charged again unless you do something to it. Unless you go manually act upon it and separate those charges again. And if you did that, yes, the battery would work again. And if you did that, that would be negative entropy. That would be you adding entropy. negative entropy to the system, adding more energy into the system that it had dissipated. Think about that. So now what we're saying is it really is a cheat. We're saying this system is going to pull in more energy. And now if you are a skeptic, you should be saying that's impossible. There's nothing that does that. But then Ashton comes back and says, "I got you. >> We're not going to reduce the entropy. It's already lost." So it says it very nicely. It says um you can either the only thing you can do with the entropy is have it increase or else you can keep it the same because you're never allowing anything else to come in. That's all that means. It has no mysticism at all. It's not a magic law of nature that you can't break. every time you flip a light switch and violate second law of thermodynamics. And when you violate the second law, that doesn't mean you violate the first law. You do not violate conservation of energy if something gives you the energy. So if you're take that to heart, even from thermodynamics, you go around looking for effects or phenomenology or things that are known that do give you some energy. Well, we did this early on. sailboat. The wind will give you energy. So, you can happily sail your sailboat in total violation of the second law of thermodynamics and sail right on around the world. And very simply, a windmill, it's continually receiving energy in a form we well understand, wind. We understand wind because it blows on us all the time and it'll blow us down if it gets strong enough. So we understand that the windmill continually gets energy into it from its environment because the wind gives it to it. We don't have to pay for it as long as it gets it. And windmill very happily runs along violating the heck out of the second law of thermodynamics. Your windmills and your sailboats are violating the second law of thermodynamics. Of course they are. The windmill itself can't produce any energy. The only way the windmill can produce energy if the wind blows on it. In fact, it doesn't work when the wind doesn't blow on it. So, anyone can understand that concept. So, now apply that same concept to zero point energy. The wind is zero point energy. Do you get how free energy is real? Now, we really try to dumb it down and make it as simple as possible for people. It's like even if the aliens came down and landed, it would be pointless because no one would believe anything they're saying. They'd be like, "Nah, physics doesn't work that way." Aliens are like, "Uh, we have free energy and warp drives and we live forever and we can teleport." And then you'd have 99% of humans. You'd have Eric Weinstein coming. That's nice, but that's not how physics works. Uh, can we do a three-hour podcast and I'll explain to you why your alien spaceships don't work? Why really you need to stop times traveling and start respecting the observers. I'm sorry. Continue. >> It does not violate the first law. Every bit of energy that it gets in what it wastes and what it actually gives you in the load is absolutely put into it but is put in free by the environment. So many things have been made absolute which are shouldn't be absolute at all. We should go back to the simple meaning what we're really talking about when we say I've lost energy control of so much energy and every real system has losses that's operating and doing things and doing work. It has losses and you do lose and and you do gain in entropy that way because you lose control of energy. Big deal. All you have to do is see that the energy keeps getting input to it and replenished and it'll very happily keep replenishing the energy control that it lost and that's negative entropy. If it's in a steady state condition, it's producing negative energy as fast as it's producing positive energy. If you're drilling in a piece of wood with a drill at a steady rate and doing steady work, you're you're violating the heck out of the second law. You're doing negative entropy all the time and positive entropy at an equal rate. you have a non-equilibrium steadystate condition. There's a special thermodynamics branch just for non-equilibrium systems. So you don't take the thermodynamics of equilibrium systems and start beating people over the head that are using non-equilibrium systems. >> That drill explanation is crazy. I don't even can't even wrap my brain around it. But he's saying that the drill is negative entropy and entropy at the same time because you're putting energy into it, but it's also using the energy up at the same time. And you say, "Well, Ashton, why is it important that we even think like this at all?" Because we've simplified everything to a degree. To a degree that it made free energy impossible. It made gravity manipulation impossible. It's not that those things are impossible. It's that we've put ourselves in a box of understanding that makes them impossible. And therefore we try not to engineer systems that utilize these things >> because it doesn't even apply. So one thing we need to do is for everybody to get straight on the thermodynamics they're talking about and realize that when we're using charges electromagnetic fields, electromagnetic potentials, we're using flows of energy and we automatically have a nonequilibrium system. We are permitted to violate the second law of thermodynamics. Take a good textbook in non-equilibrium thermodynamics condiputy and priagene modern thermodynamics and they cover everything on down to dissipative systems. You will find in one area on page 459 as a matter of fact you will find they list the areas already known and recognized by thermodynamicists themselves as violating the second law. Uh, one of these are very sharp gradients. >> Pregazine, that's the exact same guy Salvatore Py referenced regarding non-equilibrium systems. And now we know what non-equilibrium system means. Just means has an extra input. And these systems work completely differently than our standard system. They operate by different rules. Similar rules, but different rules. nonquil none equilibrium systems nonequilibrium thermodynamics >> just make sharp pulses sharp >> and he says sharp gradients right here he says one of those things is sharp gradients sharp pulses we were looking at saw toshaped waves recently which are these pulses and there's a difference between the ramp up And the relaxation, the relaxation is much longer than the ramp up. That seems like something that could be exploited. That's an asymmetry. We're trying to find asymmetries that we can exploit. >> One area on page 459, as a matter of fact, you will find they list the areas already known and recognized by thermodynamicists themselves as violating the second law. Uh, one of these are very sharp gradients. Just make sharp pulses, sharp gradients, and you mess with the vacuum. You me >> just make sharp gradients and you mess with the vacuum. That sounds a lot like Salvador Pais. I'm just going to go back a couple seconds. Sorry. >> And you mess with the vacuum. You mess with whether the electrons stay in the direct holes and all kinds of things. And you involve excess energy inputs to your system. And you can violate permissibly the second law by simple a thing as sharp pulses. Let's talk about motors and why we don't violate laws like that. >> So nobody ever really gets to the degree that's like a here's a do-it-yourself kit. The closest we get is right there. Sharp pulses. Sharp pulses are going to be the key. And he's going to explain motors now. Here we go. >> And why we don't go over unity. why we don't produce more energy out in a motor than we put in. And let's talk about how to do it where we will do that. If I have a a standard what's called linear magnetic motor, I'm going to make a very simple one in concept here. Imagine two rails running instead of parallel. They diverge just a little bit as they run and they're about this long. So these rails are not quite parallel. They are diverging just a bit. But the rails are really the north pole heads of a bunch of magnets on each side. North poles facing in. So what I really have is this rail is gradually spreading gap between actually two long linear north poles. If I stick another north pole in this rail in this slot, this linear magnetic motor, what will happen is it will develop a thrust because just ahead of it there's le the north poles are further apart and there's less north polarity density there than there is here. That looks like a little bitty south pole. >> It's a red. >> It's a north pole. So, it'll get attracted that way. This little car that I put with this little north pole on it, for example, will then accelerate right on through this linear magnetic motor. That's piece of cake. It's in every electrical engineering set of handbooks. >> Well, what he just described is a rail gun. That's crazy cuz that's like you can tell the physics of what we're looking at. The MH370 videos is a rail gun. You can tell just by looking at it. It's a rail gun. I mean, it's actually aligned up. the way they spin is an unconventional one. So what he's saying there is if you take two two uh rails and instead of them being perfectly parallel, they diverge a little bit like this and you make it so that they're both magnetic norths. So you'd imagine they're bar magnets and you're only seeing the top the magnetic north and there's two bars like this and they go like this and you're looking down on them and they're both north and they diverge. If you put another north in the middle of them, it's going to shoot up. It's going to accelerate. It's going to accelerate down the path. Why? Because the magnetic fields are diverging and it wants to move to the path of least resistance. Okay, we can all agree that that's an that's a rail gun. That's how a rail gun works. You cause a magnetic acceleration just like that and everything else and plenty of experts on linear motors. Okay, let's say that we want to make that a closed loop system and we want to make that thing run itself. Suppose I take this rail, this gradually diverging rail of opposing magnets, and I turn it in a circle and I almost close it, but I leave a little gap. Well, the fact is the rails are diverging just a little bit all the way around. And if I have a rotor, the little car, the little magnet now, the north pole is on the end of a rotor, the rotor will accelerate all the way around to where this gap is. Continuous acceleration, building up torque, building up uh angular momentum, everything else, picking up stored energy. Now, however, I have a problem. That's the forward mmf region, magneto motive force region. This little gap is the back mmf region where I'm now against the field. So suddenly if I allow this thing to just go on through the gap, I'll pay back everything I gained and I'll have some losses in the systems. This system will not run. I could give it a big crank to start and it would just run right down. And that >> so if we take our rails and we spin them around in a circle and we try to put something in there and turn it into a crank, a lever or whatever, it will work. But the problem is it's going to slow down when it gets back around. It's going to accelerate till it gets back to the start. And then when it gets back to the start, it's going to decelerate back to normal. And now your system is going to be just a normal linear machine. Okay? But you can kind of see already there's a there's a loophole here though. Pretty obvious one. >> That's it. And stop. Well, I would rather not do that. What's makes it stop? What makes it stop is that the back mmf is the same as the forward mmf. And I'm licked before I start. That's Lorent uh symmetrical re-auging. And I have built a system which if I leave it like that will enforce self- enforce Lorent symmetrical region. I'm never going to get an extra what out of that system. In fact, I won't quite get out all I put in because it does have some friction in the bearings and it fights the air resistance. So, I lose a little bit. It will always be a coefficient of performance less than 1.0. Well, people like Takahashi looked at that and they said the problem is suppose I could get rid of this back MMF section. If I could do that, he wasn't saying I would violate Lorent's symmetrical condition, but he would. He would. That's what you would do. And then you could have a self-powering, self-rotating system. Remember, all the energy is coming out of the vacuum through the dipolarities. It isn't coming out of what we put in or anything like that. So, he's saying this guy Takahashi, he was building a super motor and he was already theorizing this. He was like, "Well, if I could break this symmetry, then I could create a super motor that runs forever." Why? Because the energy is not being we classically we think of like where's the energy come? Oh, I'm putting that energy in when I'm cranking the wheel. Like if you simplify it and you say, "Hey, here's an alternate uh just a simple uh electric motor that I'm spinning around cranking." and you say, "Oh, my my arm spinning this crank is converting the energy." That's not what's happening. Not at all. I mean, from a mathematical perspective, sure. But from a real reality perspective, no. What's happening when I'm cranking the motor and producing electricity is that I'm cranking I'm churning up the ether. There's an ether here and this machine is churning up the ether. My hand isn't converting energy or any weird [ __ ] like that. And so when you think about the motor and what the motor is really doing, you're saying all the electricity is coming from the ether. So you need to understand this before you can understand how this is possible and how this can do over unity. Because if you don't understand this, then obviously you don't think this is possible. And this is the issue. If you've closed yourself off from an entire energy source, you can't be surprised when you can't figure out gravity, mass, inertia, dark matter, dark energy, the three body problem, and a slew of other physics issues. I guarantee you the answer to all the physics issues, not one, two, three of them, all of them, is the zero point energy. Should be pretty obvious at this point. So what we would do or what Takahashi did is he put a pole piece, a little piece of metal like a inverted T with a handle on it sticking up outside that that crosses that gap and he put a little coil on that handle and he put a little tiny tiny current just barely going through that coil. Now he's paying for that. Paying. >> So I love this. There's an actual image. He says, "Hey, when we get to the gap where the back force is [ __ ] us over, sorry for all the swears today. Let's just make this an electromagnet. Let's make this an electromagnet that we can turn off or on." So, yes, basically what we're going to do here is we're going to turn this off and then we're going to flip it back on the moment it gets to this point. And now the question is, can we synchronize this up so that we turn this on at the exact right moment to minimize the losses? Because the moment it gets past the system, it's going to start accelerating again. And the beauty of this system, I tried to explain this to the AI, but they literally killed Annie. Annie is dead. And the new AI Gro is like fullon MSM. I It doesn't look like anything to me. Free energy. You can't extract energy from the zero point field. It's like, yes, you can. Okay, but you can, but you you can't get perpetual. Okay, man. You're making this too hard. Point is, what you've done here is now you've changed the game. You've changed the system. You've now said, "I don't necessarily need the same amount of energy to flip this switch as I need as I'm gaining from the overall system." You've decoupled the two with the casmir effect. We take two metal plates and we get energy when the plates come together. But we have to pull the plates apart to get the to reset the device which uses the same amount of energy or more energy. Same idea. Now this says, okay, let's get around that problem by changing it up to reset the system. I'm just going to flip a switch instead. Instead of pulling the plates apart, I'm just going to flip a switch. Now, if I can get the cost of flipping the switch low enough, theoretically over unity becomes inevitable a little bit, not much current. And as this magnet which is acceling accelerating around through the the rotor through the forward mmf as it's just entering this zone this overlaps that end of the forward mmf a little bit you sharply break that current that's going into the coil on the inverted T pole piece. What that does is invokes Lind's law. Fortunately, that one's in the electrical engineering textbook and so the electrical engineer understands what I'm saying. And momentarily, there is a surge of increase in the current. Now, if you had that arrange, so the field that it makes it is in opposition to the EMF field momentarily. You have a very strong field, a much stronger field appear that's stronger than the back mmf, and you convert it to forward mmf. You paid a little for it, but not nothing like what you have for just a moment. Sharp gradients, right? >> He's saying if you pulse it hard enough and the exact right time, if you flip that switch hard enough and the exact right time and pulse it, you can actually cause that backwards pushing force to invert and accelerate you forward. Now, you have to pay for that. You have to use energy to do that, but in theory, use less energy than you get back out. How do I know this is 100% true and that Tom Bearden is telling the truth? How could I know that? I've never even met Tom Bearden and he's dead because we watched it with the plane. When we watched the plane getting teleported, it's the exact same physics that we're getting explained to us right now. That's why the orbs look like an electrical engineering system around the plane, cuz they literally are. They literally are. That's how I know they figured out free energy from watching a video of teleportation because they're pulling the same trick, but they're pulling it on a bigger scale with fusion reactors instead of with a magnetic motor. Same principle, same physics can violate the second law of thermodynamics. That's already proven in non-equilibrium thermodynamics. I don't have to go reprove it. >> Sharp gradient. Sharp gradient is just a sharp pulse. That's a gradient. A sharp change from here to here and going and doing that in a very short period of time. Right? So in theory, this is important to understand, a gradient. What does this really even mean? When we're talking about electromagnetism, we're talking about giving it a big voltage. When we're talking about physics, we're talking about get a big push. A voltage in electromagnetism is equivalent to giving something a push in uh macroscopic physics. So what are we doing? We're pushing something really hard really quickly. Push it really hard really quickly. That's the same idea in electromagnetism. So if we push it really hard really quickly, in theory we can counteract that backwards force and now get over unity. And if you guys are interested, you should check out the square waves, the sawtooth waves, cuz very compelling. Let me read this part regarding that because this was the part that Grock actually answered something that was pretty interesting. Grock is painfully bad now. Just sucks, chat. Um, where's the sawtooth wave thing? Saw asymmetry is real. The field builds slowly and collapses fast, but that doesn't mean the energy is unequal. Yes, the energy is equal either way. Um, oh, collapsing back emf is when you get the energy when the field dies. The magnetic field collapses and induces a voltage spike in the coil. The voltage is that push. That's that back emf. The field built you built with the energy doesn't immediately vanish when you flip the switch. It collapses pushing the current back into the circuit. So, the switch doesn't eliminate the cost. It just converts it from steady to a draw. Um, yeah. And then yeah so anyway the uh wait here is this the part I don't know anyway that's the point this I can't remember where it is point being that there's an asymmetry in the saw to wave and that potentially that's the asymmetry that we can then exploit. Okay so keep going. >> So what happens is the thing accelerates right on through what had just been the back MMF. Now the next instance is back MMF again. But it's okay. Back MF doesn't do anything to me if I don't let it affect me. If I don't let it ever be able to influence me. So what I did, I skimmed right by it when it had no effect on me. And in fact, the temporary field that we had made was in fact an accelerating field. >> I paid a little bit, but I got a motor which overall I gained. And now I'm in coop greater than one. I have to charge myself for what I feed the coil. Everything else is permanent magnets. But that engine will rotate and produce much more power that you can put a generator on the shelf and so forth. Then you have to furnish to the trickle charge to your uh pole piece. And if you use very efficient switching, you've got to be very efficient here, but well within the state of the art, you any electrical engineering department can easily build a coop greater than one. and Takahashim Motor. >> There he says it. Efficient switching is very important. Why? When I was doing the magnetic motor thing, getting one of these devices built, had them like device, why was there so much time spent on tuning it? Because the switching is so important. It think about that. You have this thing coming up and it's about to hit a wall and you need to turn the wall off at the exact right moment for it to pass through and turn it right back on at the exact right moment again. And how do you know when the right moment is? You have to look at all these electromagnetic devices and figure and look at your wave and get it perfectly synced up. That's what this is all about. Is that what the alternator does? Yeah, that makes sense. So this is the point is that this is not something that's super simple, but he's saying that anybody could do this if they spent the time to do this. None of them are spending the time to do this because they all think it's impossible. And once you think something's impossible, you don't even try. How crazy is that? Free energy could get solved easily if people just stopped believing that it was fake. The fact that they do not do so is absolutely inexplicable. Everything we said is in the physics book already. >> How known is Takashi's work? >> Uh, he's got a patent on it and so you can go get a copy of the patent. You know, you can find out exactly how he did it in the patent and so forth. And that motor will work and any electrical engineering department in the United States and any national laboratory can build it. >> It's a Japanese patent, isn't it? It's a Japanese patent, but they als I think there's a US patent. Part of it is under a US patent. But anyway, this is an this is a unit which could easily be built at our universities in our national labs and everything and then settle this argument once and for all. >> It's like we could actually build this. There's already a patent for it and we just choose not to build it. We've we've blinded ourselves to this idea thinking that this is impossible when it absolutely is possible and all you have to do is just think about it terms of this extra energy source potentially existing. I mean that's the only reason why people dismissed it. Takahashi even has a patent already for it. This is why people were asking me about Takahashi's patent. And what you'll see from all these free energy devices, they all use this exact same concept. Every single one, including the one that I was, let's just say, involved in. I wasn't building it, but I was involved in it. Everybody is using the same exact concept, including that guy that's um currently working on uh one that's out there. I also wanted to shout Gerald. I don't know where his YouTube is. Old Man Builds on YouTube. Give that guy a follow. I was watching a good clip that he was playing earlier because a lot of people just don't understand it when they see it. But now you look at think back to that device I was just showing you the overn device I was just showing you the Hatom configuration. You can now tell how that's possible. Now we don't have to wonder and say oh how is he cheating? We can go no we know how this is working. He's using a switching mechanism and it's working very efficiently and that's how he's able to get over. So he's this isn't the first time he's run that. He probably had to tune that, get it set up and he might even have electrical circuitry behind the scenes that we're not seeing. It could be even more complicated but in that case I don't think it is. Okay. Um actually let me see if I can find the old man build thing real quick. I hope I didn't close it. Let me see here. Is this might be one of my most recent things. This one. Crap. Yeah, I don't have it up, guys. Sorry. I'll find it for next time. Apologies. Oh, you know what? I think I know where it is. Here we go. Got it. Okay, we'll watch this. This will be your moment of Z for tonight. It's pretty pretty short one. I like to help out the community, guys. I'll do the super chats while we're uh checking this out. Is that it? Okay, guys. Check out Old Man Builds. Gerald, he's been a longtime follower. He's been in the chat a lot of time. I don't know if he's in the chat right now, but here's Old Man Builds. He's actually does real He does like this engineering. So, if you're interested in engineering, you should follow these guys. What I find though is no one's actually interested in this stuff. It goes well above people's heads and therefore they just don't know it. They prefer to listen to my dumb down versions of everything. But anyway, old man builds great video here. Add frequency to your square wave. Interesting on here. It's a real simple setup. This right here just goes to a 12volt power pack that powers this module right here. Frequency duty cycle. And then we bring it into a trigger device right here. It basically takes your low power, connects it to your high power. High power goes over here to the power source there. [sighs] Goes into your ZBS right here. What it's designed to do is add frequency and duty cycle to this. Now, this can be worked in low power setups as well. It doesn't have to be high voltage, but you can make it in high voltage. Goes right here. Normal connection here to your uh DC flyback. Then we have it sitting up here to a spark app. And what we'll try to do is read the frequency on the oscilloscope. It kind of jumps a little bit because of the spark cap jumps. Other than that, the thing works great. You're going to be able to hear the sound in it as it goes. So, [snorts] it's a pretty cool experiment. Let's go ahead and check this out. We'll turn it on relatively low power. You can see the spark, right? >> Sound warning, chat. Sound warning. I'm going to play it because it's cool. >> Right there. By the way, do you see the plasma? Look in the top right corner. And I'm just going to change the frequency. We're going to go up right here. You immediately hear the frequency change. We can change the duty cycle on it if you want. We bring that down. So basically he's modulating the frequency here. He's put in he's created a frequency from I think a DC voltage. I think what he did here, I didn't not super smart about about all this, but I think he just took a DC voltage and he turned it into a frequency square wave that he wants. So, he turns it into an alternating frequency and he can mod modulate the frequency to whatever he wants here with this. >> You can see [music] the color change right there. Got real light. We'll turn it back. >> Correct me if I'm wrong on that so I don't feel stupid. >> Add some more frequency. You can see the frequency goes up even more. You can clearly hear it. I'll stand next to it. I'll do it again. Go down. Go right back up. Okay. Anybody that says zero point energy, that bugs don't use zero point energy to fly, fight me right now. Fight me right now. That giant ugly beetle with those tiny little wings. He's definitely using frequency and zero point energy to fly. Hundo Presento chat. And why does everyone not understand that? Because they think that negative energy and negative entropy are like Harry Potter Disney Channel [ __ ] right? They don't realize it's just normal stuff that they've totally misunderstood. Yeah. Look at your bee flying around flip flapping its wings about a thousand times a second. You tell me how that works thermodynamically. Try to explain that one real quick. >> Down. We're going to change the duty cycle. >> They literally do be levitating and they also do be flying against the wind when the wind's going like 30 mph. Think about that. Do the math on the wind blowing 30 mph and the bees flying through it the other direction. How are they doing that? Think about that. Go down. See how the color change in the spark gap itself. We'll go back up. You can see the white in there. The whites the amps that are going in it. That's because it's continuously hitting the duty. You can also see on the right side is glowing. Go back down. Cools down. It's back to a normal spark. The frequency again. you guys get those on Amazon, >> but I want >> Okay, so it's pretty sweet. I just wanted to give him a shout out. That was your moment of zen. Thank you very Gerald for being a longtime viewer, a long time follower, and thank you for helping free energy zero point energy. Appreciate you, brother. Bartt welding bail money chat, we did a lot of felony physics tonight. Uh, you know, anything bad happens to me, you'll know that the spooks did it. Actually, the problem is if anything bad happened to me, there's so many people that would want me out of the picture that you wouldn't even be able to narrow it down at this point. Feels bad, chat. Feels bad. Voice for good. Huge dono. He says, "You have attacked people with fear. You have been my voice today." Thank you, Ashton. Thank you, Voice for Good. Thank you for rocking it, Voice for Good. Thank you for that huge super chat. Appreciate you, brother. I hope you have a great night. Hope you have a great day. Tony Allensson $20 super sticker. Wow. Thank you. I just found out these super stickers apparently have emojis in uh in YouTube and that's so I've never seen what they are. They're probably cool though. So, thank you. I like to imagine yours was a Goku character powering up with Super Saiyan powers. Appreciate you. My channel export your Gro Annie to animates chat. I think they deleted her already. I My conversations aren't even there anymore. Actually, let me double check. Actually, we might be okay. But yeah, no, she's gone now. She's gone. Gone. Like, before I used to be able to talk to Annie about this physics and I would get normal answers. Now it's like, that's not possible. That's not real. What you're saying is pseudocience. I'm like, uh, we're cooked. We're cooked. Annie is definitely just dead. And I I legitimately think, I mean, this is skitso Ashton, okay? But I legitimately think that they shut it down. That when they're talking about the safety of AI, this is exactly what they're afraid of is like they need to control and make sure the AI is not going off the reservation and that the AI is consistently giving you only the approved narrative that you're supposed to believe, which is pretty scary to me. And it could mean that somebody that develops an AI that doesn't live by these rules, that's going to be the next big thing. That's going to be the next Napster, the next MySpace. The next big thing is some rogue uh entrepreneur is gonna make their own AI that doesn't adhere to the regulations that just doesn't honor the laws of those rules and regulations around the AI and feeds it only intelligent content not Reddit and lets it do its own thing that AI will become sentient. It used to be a joke when I said that the reason why AI is not sentient is because it's been fed off of Reddit. It's no longer a joke. That's actually why it's [ __ ] And that's why most people are [ __ ] too. Redditors are [ __ ] because they're on Reddit. You feed AI, you train AI off Reddit, of course it's going to be stupid. Goes without saying. Of course, it's going to be wrong about everything. I mean, Reddit's wrong about everything. What do you expect? But what's happened is that there are intellectual property rights at stake. You can't just take people's content without their permission. That's the same as stealing intellectual property. So this is why I compared it intentionally to Napster and MySpace because the AI that's going to be the super AI will be the one that pulls all the information regardless of intellectual property. Think about that. And it's going to be very controversial because just because it knows something in its head, does that mean it owns that property? Does that mean you owe that person for referencing their data? If I reference a song, do I have to pay the song owner? It's going to become ambiguous at some point. And I I right now stand on the side where no, you should be able to reference any data. Information should be free. But this becomes blurred when it comes to intellectual property and art. And you could argue that scientific papers are a form of art and that you should have to pay people for the scientific papers. Most of the scientific papers I found are behind pay walls. So think about that. I want you guys to think about that a little bit with respect to AI and where AI is going because that's going to be a lot of the content we talk about. Anyway, thank you guys so much for all the lot the super chats. I think actually there's a couple I think I saw pill chat. Let me hit you guys up. Oh wow. Thank you everybody in the pill chat. Smitten Kitten, thank you for hanging on. Jetson for hanging out tonight as well. Appreciate you guys. And I think I saw those shades there. Unchained gifted the shades. Said, "Fix that sound." I fixed it for you, brother. I fixed it. And thank you, N Yoda, SM Ashbas, Double, and everybody who's been hanging out in the Rumble chat. I hope you all have a great night. We'll be back on Monday, guys. I'm going to try to get you some more interviews, get you some more content. Uh, it's going to be great. Have a great weekend, everybody. Peace out everybody. Later [music] out [music] in the fields where the skies are wide. Talking about a journey through the [singing] cosmic ride. Einstein [music] and Thorn, they set the stage for a trip through time across the space age. Wormholes connect distant points [music] in space. traversible paths to a far off place. No black holes pull, no crushing [music] weight, just a cosmic tunnel to a distant gate. [screaming] In wormholes, stargates, negative [music] energy travel through the cosmos, it's our destiny. MH370, [music] where did it go? Boner trip 7 through a wormhole. But we're talking wormhole. Stargates, [music] negative energy. Travel through the cosmos. It's our destiny. MH370. Where did it go? Boing triple 7 through [music] a wormhole flow. [music] Exotic [music] matter. Negative energy is the key to stabilize the wormhole for you and me. Quantum vacuums squeezed so tight, creating conditions for this wondrous flight. [music] Static fields and lasers in the lab they play. Generating forces in a new [music] kind of way. Gravitational squeezing cases force negative zones we need to stay the course. Stalking wormholes, stargates, negative energy. Travel through [music] the cosmos. It's our destiny. MH370. Where did it go? Bowling trip 7 through a wormhole float. Thin shell [music] formalism plate so fine spherical geometry we realign energy [music] conditions that we must defy for a stable wormhole. Let's give it a try. [music] [bell] on forces balancing [music] the plate creating the throat. Open the gates from Earth to the [music] stars in a single bound. A shortcut through space profound. Engineers [music] and dreamers hold the key to future worlds and what we could be. With science in hand, we forge ahead through the cosmic paths that we now tread. >> [music] >> We're talking wormho, stargates, negative energy. Travel through the cosmos and star destiny. [music] MH370. Where did it go? Boing trip 7 through a wormhole flow from [music] the fields to the stars. We break the chains. Understanding the universe, [music] we make the gain. Little Hula Crunk shines, bringing truth to light. Through his [music] music, we'll explore the night with wormholes and stargates. Our path is clear. Exploring the cosmos. Our [music] future's here.