The Casimir Effect Proves the Vacuum Is Full of Energy

Let's get back to physics. >> [clears throat] >> Zero-point energy. One of the Was this it, by the way? No, this wasn't it. Now, you actually made a different post that I want to highlight about Robert Forward. Here it is. >> [snorts] >> And this is the crux of tonight's live stream. 1984, Robert Forward showed that you can extract zero-point energy.

1984. That's almost older than me. 41 years ago, Robert Forward showed zero-point energy can charge a capacitor, charge a battery. That is proof proof that you can extract zero-point energy. Undeniable proof. And we haven't even passed that hurdle.

We haven't got past that gate yet with most people still. Which is incredible to me. Because if I repost this, let's take a stroll through the comments here. Here we go. Calling the Casimir effect extracting zero-point energy is pure reification. The plates snapping together aren't powered by uh phantom vacuum energy.

They're responding to standard physical boundaries and their surrounding pressure. No. That's the problem. It's not standard. That's the issue. They are extracting zero-point energy. Where do you think that energy is coming from, exactly? There are two plates right here.

And they would say, "Well, there's potential energy." Yes, potential zero point energy. This is my problem with people. And then just like a robot, just like you're talking to Grok, the moment you tell these people I'm not talking about constantly, a process where I'm doing it constantly. I'm just talking about a process where it happens one time. One time.

If plates are there and they magically come together all on their own, which is what happens in the Casimir effect, that is extracting zero point energy, that energy must come from somewhere. Simple as that, it must come from somewhere. Explaining that it's a pressure force doesn't explain where the energy comes from. I agree, it's it is a pressure force. Zero point energy, gravity is a pressure force. But you have to explain where it's coming from.

That's the whole thing about energy. And then they say, "Or derp." And this person just like literally most people are just AI on the internet. This is probably not even a real human. You can tell it's AI response cuz it's got the stupid double line thing right here. By the way, you see this double line thing?

No human being ever uses this. They don't even know where you can find this character. So, you're talking to an AI. And then the problem is what people are doing is they're just taking your Twitter post and they're pasting it into AI and they're having AI give you a response. And it's just a generic response. And then they're pasting it and they're getting engagement that way.

And they're doing no effort. And then what they're doing is they're scripting it. They're script running a script to have AI do that. They're saying, "Okay, here's my bot. It's going to look at your post and then it's going to comment most of a generic AI response on there." Literally what people are doing.

Yeah, it's dead internet. Honestly, this has been going on for many like it's been going on for probably over 10 years. We're at the point now where half of your responses are just this basically just fake posts like this. But here's the other part. They say you can't then they jump in and say, "Okay, well, what about if you're trying to make it a repeat cycle?" For because if you could make a repeat cycle from that it would be infinite energy.

Yes, we're not going to make an infinite energy cycle out of two metal plates. You got me there. Two two conductive plates are not going to make an infinite energy cycle. But what if we do something else? This is just a proof of concept. Casimir effect is just a proof of concept.

The Casimir effect just shows you can extract zero point energy. That's what we're learning from the Casimir effect. Then you would say, "Well, what is the fundamental thing that is causing these plates to come together?" Is there another way to engineer that? Maybe we can engineer that with magnetism. Hypothetically or plasma.

Right? Cut. Yeah, and then like what is this? You can't mine a math base on this is just AI garbage stuff. But the point being when people say zero point energy is the lowest ground state, it's not. It's just the ground state.

Zero point energy is just the ground state. It's not the lowest ground state cuz there is a lower one. And how would you extract it? How would you extract perpetual energy or why is it possible? Because you say you say, "Hey, these plates coming together." I say, "That's zero point energy extraction."

You say, "Yes, but if I want to put the plates back." And I say, "I don't need to put the plates back." But okay. If I pull the plates back apart, this requires the exact same amount of energy as them coming together. And what if I told you no, it doesn't? What if I told you there's no Why does it have to require the same amount of energy?

What if I just said that? This is where it's so easy to challenge idiot academics. Well, they would Are they going to say that all uh it always takes the exact same amount of energy input and output? Cuz that's just objectively not true. Look at a cannon. I can light a match on a cannon and the cannonball is going to go flying.

So, what if I come up with another way that doesn't require the same amount of energy? That's not two plates. And I break that condition. You're giving me a condition you're saying it's always going to take the same amount of energy to to pull the plates apart. What if I say, "Okay, I'm going to defeat that." I'm going to get around that.

I'm going to not use two plates so that now I don't have to pull them apart every time. I'm going to use a different mechanism. Again, people don't think outside the box. And all this physics has been out there since 1984. We've been known for sure we can do this since 1984. And yet people just are not curious.

People are not willing to think for themselves or think critically at all. Instead, they just let AI and other people do the thinking for them. And it shouldn't be needed to have to tell them this. Any academic physicist should be able to come to these same conclusions on their own just reading the scientific papers. And they're not coming to them cuz they're afraid, they're cowards, they're not really deep thinkers. What you find is most academics in general are not very intelligent.

They're just larping. They're generally well-read. They had to research a bunch of stuff to to pass their papers, pass their exams. But for the most part, they're not necessarily any smarter than you or I are. Okay. Next thing here. Jesse Michaels >> [clears throat] >> Interview with former Secretary of Energy John Harrington incoming.

Let's see if my response has any comments. What does this energy have to do with UFOs? And yes, I am trolling. Of course, I'm trolling. But isn't that the greatest troll? Why is Jesse Michaels interviewing under secretaries or secretaries of energy?

What does that have to do with psychic phenomenons and UFOs and aliens? That's the question that people should be asking. Isn't this a little bit of a departure? No, it's not. It's not a departure. Why?

Because UFOs are using fusion technology. They're using nuclear technology. All of this is hidden in the Department of Energy. Department of Energy is probably the number one player on this. You always wonder, why is the Department of Energy so powerful? If they weren't really hiding anything, they wouldn't be powerful.

But they're hiding literal fusion. They're hiding the controlling of fusion and plasma orbs that can fly around. That's what makes them so powerful. So that's the reason why Jesse's interviewing these guys.