Video Transcript
Physicists create holographic wormhole using quantum computer. The unprecedented experiment explores the possibility of spacetime somehow emerges from quantum information. They have created the first ever wormhole, a kind of theorized 1935 Nathan Rosen. The wormhole emerged like a hologram out of quantum bits of information stored in tiny superconducting circuits. By manipulating the cubits, physicists sent information through the wormhole. The team led by Maria Subaloo and I you guys should check her stuff out. I think she's the one where I read more. This goes way deeper, too. Like they've already literally proven ER equals EPR is true. These people have already proven it's true experimentally. Sabine Austin Felder has not read up on this at all. I guarantee you implemented the novel wormhole teleportation protocol. They literally built a protocol and sent information in a complex system, not just one bit of information, a complex system of information through an analog wormhole in a quantum computer and it showed up on the other side. Get [ __ ] Sabine Hosenfelder. And just to add insult to injury, Ashton Forbes is a better physicist than you. Here you go. I already predicted the Nobel Prize last year before it even came out. Boom. This is how it works. You don't want to call it wormhole. That's fine. We don't have to call it a wormhole. Call it macroscopic quantum tunneling dimension. So if we were to see the extra dimension, we would see the ripple in that extra dimension. And this is how quantum tunneling works as well. How is the electron getting through? Because there's an extra dimension and you're seeing the ripple. And now from the perspective of quantum mechanics, you would say there's a probability that the electrons on the other side of the wall. And so what is the analogy then? If we say ER equals EPR, we say, okay, that's EPR. We just saw the electron teleport through a wall. It shouldn't be able to do physically. Well, the equivalent is we need to find out what's the barrier of our macroscopic reality. What's the wall? The wall is spacetime. The wall is the zero point energy. That's the wall between me being here and me being in your seat. So, if we remove that zero point energy, if we squeeze that zero point energy out, then theoretically we can cause macroscopic quantum tunneling to oop macroscopic quantum tunneling. otherwise known as, you know what, I got a better name for a wormhole, too, chat. Let's call it unlabored acceleration. How about unlabored acceleration? The reason why I love it is because what we're doing is we're conditioning the vacuum, conditioning spaceime, conditioning around our object in order to reshape topography of spaceime itself. Just like in that video we watched. And how are we going to do this? How are we going to interact with spacetime? This is the big mystery. What is gravity manipulation? How do we do that? How do we figure that out? Well, for our last thing tonight, I want to I was digging through some of my old links that I have up. And how crazy is this? Let me pull this up. I saw that I had been digging through the old NASA breakthrough physics propulsion conference proceedings and I found this massive, massive document. In fact, I was actually looking for the big slide that shows all of the things they worked on. And what I found out was David Frooning was like one of the main reasons why this happened, this conference. And I was going through this. There's 416 pages on this. I was randomly sliding through it and I saw something that stuck out to me earlier today, right before this live stream and it was this. And I scrolled up to the top of it and I said experiments to explore space coupling specially conditioned electromagnetic fields. Chat, this is the felony physics. This is the stuff that gets you put on lists. This is why you guys are here tonight. This is the stuff that you don't get on the Discovery Channel. You're not going to get this on uh the Corridor Crew or Danny Jones. This is the stuff that you only get right here. I'm here to tell you this. This is the secret that I get you on that gets you further than everybody else. I've already seen what the answer is and I've been reverse engineering to figure out how they pulled it off and were directly over the target. These are the guys that pulled it off. Found them. Found them. So, you don't need to go looking around on which papers you need to read. I've already got it laid out for you. These are them. These are the crew. Here we go. Let's do this thing. Although the space-time metric is associated with gravitation and can be distorted somewhat by electromagnetic influences, there is no strong interaction or coupling between ordinary electromagnetic fields and those of gravitation because they are a different essence and form. But if the fields associated with ordinary electromagnetic radiation, think of light, could be endowed with an essence and form similar to that which underlies gravitation, a much stronger coupling or interaction might be accomplished for propulsive use. This paper describes several ways of creating specially conditioned electromagnetic radiation and several ways that the fields associated with such radiation might interact with those associated with gravity or the vacuum's 0 state. Boom, baby. Why does he say or? Because it's assumed that gravity and zero point energy are connected. Okay, let's skip ahead a little bit. He basically tells us all about zero point energy fluctuations. I don't remember if he talks about haludaf he says thus if everything and this is what you'll see from some of the people who will try to argue against this. So they'll say everything is lorren invariant means everything's in a calm equilibrium so that you can't have this zero point you can't have free energy and he says thus the 0 point energy acts uniformly over bodies moving at a constant speed causing no net force but the zero point energy fluctuations are not isotropic and lorren invariance in the accelerating reference frames and accelerating bodies so what's the answer. They're only Lorent invariant in constant speed. When they're accelerating, all the rules are thrown out. Now, you say, Ashton, what about the ion pumpy thing in General McCassland? And I say, that's why they've got their undulator in there. Remember the clapping effect and the synchronization? If they want to drive something far from equilibrium, imagine you're trying to break your wine glass with your voice. You got to hit that thing with the right pitch. You got to drive it far from equilibrium until it shatters. That's what these guys are trying to do. So you have to it. So what we want to do is we want to accelerate our particles. We want to accelerate our particles, get them moving in motion in synchronization. and potentially get them oscillating respective to one another. So we can get relativistic effects, accelerating effects. So that's the big difference right there. That's huge. So I'm going to repeat this one more time. The zero point energy is not isotropic and lorent invariant in accelerated frames of accelerated bodies. H Rudon Pudof have proposed that inertia of bodies might be a consequence of zero point energy. It is Okay, now we know about that. Let's keep going down here. Where's the part I want to get to? We're going to skip down here. Although this is Mark Milis. Mark Millis notes that electromagnetism is a logical choice for creating an accelerating induced force and that is uh related to some degree to spaceime and gravity and is techn technology we are fairly proficient. Okay, let's keep going here. This is the part. If a nonabalian field underlies gravitation and what is he saying in nonabalian? He's saying that there is essentially an extra dimension just like the kid with the book. Just like the kid with the book, if we add an extra dimension, it changes the equations of electromagnetism. Suddenly, now I have to worry about up, I have to worry about straight ahead, I have to worry about left and right, but now I have to worry about the extra dimension. There's an extra degree of freedom. So this changes all of our math, changes our equations, changes how we have to look at Maxwell's equations. And if you're wondering, is this connected to the scalar potential? Yes, exactly. So if the nonabalian field underlies gravitation, as suggested by Yang, significant interaction between nonabalian gravitational fields and abelian electromagnetic fields is not likely. But one of us, Terrence Barrett, has shown the possibility of transforming ordinary electromagnetic fields into conditioned electromagnetic fields of nonabilian form and higher symmetry. So he's saying Terren Barrett has an idea on how to convert normal light, normal electromagnetic energy into energy that will manipulate gravity. That's what they're saying right there. Plain English. You just have to be able to convert a few words. He postulates the possibility of such fields coupling globally with the nonabelian gauge fields that may be associated with space-time gravitation through a quantity that may be commonly known as the a vector potential. Now, this is huge. That right there is the Rosetta Stone. I just gave you the felony physics that certain CIA agents are probably listening to this having a panic attack over. The answer is the na for the nonabelian field. This creates what is that extra vector that extra vector that extra gauge it's giving us this connection to this extra dimension and they're saying how do we control that the a vector potential the vector potential is directly connected to that okay well now we have that can we take it further the preponderance of current scientific opinion is that gravity is one of four fundamental forces. But investigators such as Sakarov and Pudof contend that gravity is not a fundamental force but one that arises from continual electromagnetic interplay from the zero point fluctuations. The zero point fluctuations in such a configuration can therefore be considered an anillion field of U1 symmetry. But if a nonabilian field underlies gravitation, I already read all this. Okay, perhaps such a nonabilian field component would be manifested in accelerated frames where a spectral distortion of ZPF occurs. Now, why is this very interesting? Because I am starting to figure out what's in the orbs. The ion pumpy thing. General McCasslin might be as important to find as Edward Lynn at this point. I think he was leaking it to us. It's all about accelerated frames. And how do we create our accelerated frames? We create our undulators and we have them start vibrating like this. And now we're creating accelerated frames because things are coming towards each other. Then they're slowing down and then they're accelerating again. And if you look at this this motion in theory, if they're correct here, then this motion I'm doing should cause relativistic acceleration frames between them. between these objects that are looking at each other. So if there is the possibility of inertia and accelerated matter being a consequence of both a balian and nonabelian gauge field interactions with these interactions as suggested then it should be through accelerated matter or distorted zero point energy. So there's two ways where this should be possible. Number one we manipulate the zero point energy. If we pull the zero point energy away, that should give us what we want. The other way is if we use conditioned electromagnetic fields. This is Salvatore paest. Now I haven't checked because a I don't want to get Salvatore pais killed and I don't want to get in trouble. But I would bet you if you do a cross reference of David Fonin's and Terren Barrett's conditioned electromagnetic fields, you're going to find a lot of overlaps directly with what Salvador Pais has been talking about in terms of amplifying energy. I would take a look at his high energy electromagnetic field generator very closely. Ordinary and specially conditioned EM radiation although and by the way this paper's 30 years old. This is 30 years old. this paper. Although even the most complex combinations of frequency and amplitude modification do not transform EM fields into nonabelian fields of higher symmetry. This is very important. The reason why we don't see gravity manipulation is because normal electromagnetic waves don't interact or you think about it as don't interact strongly with gravity. So that's why you can't just say, "Oh, electromagnetism and gravity are connected like this." There's a key. We have to figure out the key. Once we figure out the key code, then they do connect. But they don't connect before that. It's like a lock that we have to figure out the answer to. And we're going to figure it out. And he says, even if you do modulation and amplitude changes, you're still not going to get strong coupling. You have to do something very specific if you want to get this coupling effect.