Banned. Felony Physics CANCELED

Breaking news tonight. A Malaysia Airlines flight [music] with 239 people on board, including four Americans, has gone missing. >> Even as these [music] grainy satellite images released today by the Chinese government. >> Again, the the Malaysia flight too was a [music] was one shot at China saying knock it out. >> Why shoot it down though if it's not hostile? >> Our technologies permit us to manipulate time and space. >> Far more powerful than people understand.

We have weaponry [music] that nobody has any idea what it is, and it is the most powerful weapons in the world. [music] Not even close. >> I remember the line from the [music] Hindu scripture, the Bhagavad Gita. Vishnu [music] is trying to persuade the prince that [music] he should be his duty. And to impress him, [music] takes on his multi-armed form and says, [music] now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds. [music] I suppose we all thought that one way or another. >> Hands up. Don't shoot. Hands up. Don't shoot.

Hands up. Don't shoot, chat. Wow. Welcome to the live stream. Welcome to the most censored live stream in all of the internet. Wow.

Chat, the stories are true. The rumors are true. I have seven day ban on X. I have therefore ascended or descended depending on your perspective back halfway to dark Ashton, medium dark Ashton, possibly brown Ashton. Oh chat, let's go ahead and analyze right off the bat. If this seven day ban, and I'm talking you can't even reply to DMs. They threw me in solitary social media confinement. [clears throat] The man doesn't want you to know about zero point energy.

Who did this? The deep state. 100% The people hiding MH370 called in a favor. They made a call. They said this guy needs to be offline. This guy is he's he's getting a little too close.

Guys, I begged AOC. I said I'll dye my hair blue. Woke 2.0. I was on the team. What do I get for groveling? I get my head chopped off.

For groveling to woke 2.0. This is what they want. By the way, this proves that I'm correct about woke 2.0. This is exactly what they want for all of you. They want you all banned from social media. They don't want you to have a voice.

They don't want you to be able to talk. They want only their way or the highway. They are the cry bullies of the internet, the libtards. Okay. By the way, also coinciding with my Shadow Figures episode, which we are going to take a look at tonight. So we are going to get down deep in the trenches tonight.

Full-on fourth wall break. My pair of social followers are going to enjoy the episode tonight. We're going to look at the upcoming MH370 episode Shadow Figures. And I have a little bit more to talk about regarding my own endeavors. And why this ban is so interesting. Now before we get to that, let's deal with the task at hand, chat.

Let's deal with the situation. I'm not going to run from it. [Omitted by 4Orbs: 4:54 to 40:55, a dispute that names private individuals. The full stream is on YouTube.] Okay. Let's switch gears.

That's enough. I can't even bookmark stuff cuz I got blocked. Now I have to click on little links like a primitive chat. Now I'm the primitive and then pull them up one at a time. This is going to be worth it though, I think. Normally this would have been the intro, but I got banned.

Take a look at this, chat. Chad Robshaw of Shadow Figures new Tucker Carlson series. Chat, do we love Tucker Carlson now? I I won't lie to you, chat. I'm worried that the demon possessed Tucker Carlson Smile style. Have you seen the Smile movies?

They were good. [Omitted by 4Orbs: 41:58 to 42:24, a dispute that names private individuals. The full stream is on YouTube.] Anyway, Tucker Carlson posses potentially possessed by a demon, admits that a demon attacked him and I'm just saying I didn't see him get an exorcism. That's okay though. I still I'll still listen.

I'll listen to anybody even I don't agree with them. And I I will talk to Tucker Carlson. We might need to clear a few things up here because what I'm about to play is not exactly 100% accurate. That's fine. We get a shout out. Cite chat.

Tucker Carlson shout out. If you go all the way back to the beginning of this, there were three people I wanted to talk to. And we potentially are halfway. You can maybe get like a half a sack. In football you share sacks. This is like a half a sack.

Tucker Carlson, first one. Second one, Bill Maher. That one's feeling a little out of reach, not going to lie. Third one, Joe Rogan. Joe Rogan, that one's going That one's probably going to require some work. [laughter] Who who even is Joe Rogan? Who's that?

Look, we did Candace Owens. I'm not sure that's a flex anymore, but we did it. Okay, let's listen. Let's watch. Enough enough foreplay. Where does this start?

Here we go. The disappearance of Malaysian Airlines flight 370. >> Oh, um what happened to it? >> Well, you have uh I I don't think we still know even after my episode, but [laughter] but uh Ash Ashton Forbes uh is a a theorist and that's who he >> Whoa, I know that guy. Wait, what does this say right up here? Ashton Forbes. By the way, fun fact, in Asia they can't say Forbes. Like it's actually like impossible.

I'm not I think I'm not being racist. I think they just can't do it cuz like I don't know, it's hard to say those words. Forbes is how they say it. Ashton Forbes. >> Interview Yes. on Malaysia flight 370. It is a really interesting theory uh and that theory is that that that a government program intercepts Malaysia flight 370 using orb technology to transport it to to uh to a different location. See >> See, we need an update. Orb technology.

Now you come off and you say, hey, they used some orb technology. First of all, I find it funny. I enjoy it. I find it funny. I might even call it orb technology going forward. Second of all, though, they definitely think you're crazy you start with some like that.

Even Tucker Carlson's like, I don't know about this. And Tucker Carlson got attacked by a demon. So you got to start with it's a fusion reactor. It's a particle accelerator, fusion reactor. They figured out fusion. They're just hiding fusion.

That's not that hard for people to wrap their brain around. >> Yeah, a secret CIA military base. And it sounds crazy. However, if the video, which the video is in debate, if the video that that he shows is real, then then certainly it's it's plausible, right? You see So first of all, on on the flight you have you have 20 semiconductor Usually when a plane goes down, you're like, who's on the plane? Like you want to know like that plane went down, who was on this plane?

20 semiconductor engineers that were part of a of government program flying from Malaysia to Beijing. >> So pretty close. And this is a good angle to go at it. Because you say, hey, there's no actual plane. They haven't found the plane. So where what what motivation would there be to even disappear a plane? And you're like, oh, well, there are these 20 engineers on board.

So this is a pretty good angle to go at. Now, they weren't they were defense contractors. And I mean that in the sense that Free Scale was a defense contractor, American defense contractor. And that just means they have contracts with the government. Now, in the context of microchips, that's really important. Now, 10 years ago, we wouldn't have known that microchips were so important.

Like we all knew, okay, microchips are yeah, you put them in computers, really important, right? But now we look at microchips and we're like, holy look at Nvidia. Look at Nvidia. And you're like, whoa, microchips aren't just this booming economy. They're also the main support for AI, which is a national security issue. AI is a national security issue, which is why it's so brutal the Democrats won cuz they're definitely going to try to ban AI.

Side note, is it really that bad? See, I'm like the CIA. This is why I would have been the perfect CIA officer. People say, Ashton, shouldn't you be upset that the Democrats won? Kind of, but I also kind of realize politics is I also kind of realize you just play the board the way it's played that it's laid out. Is AI being banned even that bad of a thing?

The reason why I'm against this cuz it's already too late. If you had maybe tried to ban AI 20 30 years ago, we maybe would have been talking about something. We're trying to ban AI when we're 10 ft from the finish line. There's no chance. Dune was right. Ban all thinking machines.

We're just a little too late now. We're like 20 years too late. Anyway, here we go. >> Uh so there's a little bit of a motive there like where are these guys going? Are they defecting going to give US technology to China and and so the US military would or the CIA or US military want to gain control of the aircraft. And so how do they do that? Well, they would would Ashton alleges is that the plane takes off and after the plane takes off, smoke starts coming from the back of the aircraft.

And the plane lowers itself. It it lowers itself and and naval vessel contacts the pilot and says your plane's on fire. We need you to go to this location and we're going to do an emergency rescue. >> So yeah, I think when I did the interview, I don't feel like I was committed to that point, but I've always said one of the options either they had control the plane or they told the pilot come to this rendezvous point. Those are the only two ways that you can get the plane to the location you're trying to get to. It's not really new.

I think that they're just he's kind of like mixing up a little bit of the details is is all that's going on. Which you can't really blame I mean how much is he he hasn't he hasn't dug into this the way you or I have right?

He's only dug into this from like the interview he did with me and like you know even when they were doing the thing with the plane and the fire it's not like they knew all the super details of everything but he's pretty knowledgeable. >> And so the plane on fire theory is something that we needed to test because we didn't believe that that there could be a plane on fire that would last over an hour. >> So here's and and that's how you know he does know the details cuz what he's saying what the story is is that 30 40 minutes after the plane takes

off that some kind of fire goes off this is the reason why the plane turns around. So that's what the it's that the fire is answering is the radar and the data shows the plane making a manual turn back turning back around. Why does it do that? That's an emergency maneuver. So I'm presenting a pretty basic story that it was an emergency event. You're doing an emergency maneuver there's an emergency event.

What would be an emergency event? Oh a fire. There's a fire on the plane and there's a witness Mike McKay sees the plane on fire. So it's not like this is a crazy theory. It's supported by the only evidence. What other evidence is there for another thing that happened?

Oh it was the pilot that did it based on what evidence? No there's no evidence the pilot did this. There's no intentional maneuver for for what? Oh you just wanted to take the plane in a different direction. What? What if he's going to take over the plane and crash it he's just going to crash the plane right there not turn it back around and go back to the airport.

What the are you guys talking about? Turn around and go to the airport? >> Oh to >> So here's the deal here's the rub and now I think since he mentioned this I'm going to give full disclosure on this. Before I was only holding back cuz I thought you know maybe they're trying to save this or whatever in terms of reveal. But the whole reason why they reached out to us is they wanted to test some aspect of these conspiracy theories to see how realistic they are in this MythBusters type TV show. Which I think is pretty cool, pretty compelling.

And I don't think they I think they intentionally are trying to go into it from a non-debunking standpoint. They don't really want to be confrontational and they just want to explore aspects of this. So for me, they approached me with the idea or I think we worked through the idea of the fire aspect of it, which I just thought was cool. Sure. So the idea is that there's a fire that forces the turn back. But here's the thing.

In those videos, the smoke, that's an hour and 15 minutes later. This is over here in the South China Sea where we see this first turn back with the fire. Now we're way over here in the Nicobar Islands when we're watching the videos and there's smoke coming out of the back of the plane. So the point, the reason why the fire was generally ruled out is for the same reason as this, not because of these videos, because they thought this plane can't be flying for any long period of time with a fire on it. Which is, let's say it's contested.

What I'm going to say is this. These guys burn up a different plane, a smaller plane with some batteries, and they come away saying there's no way lithium ion batteries could burn inside a plane. It would burn it way too fast. I may or may not have some experts that are going to I don't want to say refute it, but let's say present some evidence that may not align necessarily with that viewpoint. And I'll even admit that I was actually kind of of the opinion that there's is really a major out of control fire that's going to be able to propagate.

But what do I know about Boeing 777s cuz I have had to learn a lot? What I've learned is that these cargo bays are actually insulated for fire specifically. So they're actually already aware and ready for fire events. They actually have insulated specific cargo bays for this and they have automatic fire suppression machines that will come out automatically and start flowing if there's a fire, any smoke that's detected. So at least me, the series of events with the turn back perfectly matches smoke being detected in the fire and then the pilot immediately turning the plane back around under manual control.

It's exactly what you would do. >> about to make it to a rendezvous point. First of all, you can't have a the the the the the plane fire was said to be because of these these lithium batteries were put on this plane unmanifested. I think I think I got to go back and look the number, but I think it's like 200 lb of of lithium batteries were put on this plane unmanifested right before. Now lithi- >> 487 lb, 220 kg. That is true. So there are these batteries on the plane.

That's clearly the suspect. It's The batteries are as much of a suspect as the 20 free scale engineers. That's how much the batteries stick out when a plane is vanished. You're like, well, there's all these dangerous batteries on board. How are we just ignoring that? Oh, it couldn't have been that.

Why? Because you don't think that the batteries could have been the problem? What if it wasn't a completely out-of-control fire? Here's a crazy thought. What if it wasn't a completely out-of-control fire? Now this is how I know these guys weren't trying to debunk me like intentionally or anything like that because they could have just taken that and said this is impossible.

The fire would have burnt the plane down. Therefore this theory is stupid. But instead, listen to what he says. He actually doesn't do that. And this is how they acted in person, too. So, this is why I didn't didn't feel like they were going to try to debunk me or anything like that.

Cuz they can frame the narrative how you want here, right? >> And uh fire can't be put out with water. In fact, the aircraft don't even have water suppression systems because uh you can't carry that much water to put it out. >> So, this party is totally wrong about sadly. So, if they were going to attack me, I would just completely debunk this. But yes, they don't use water fire suppression because water doesn't work on lithium ion batteries. They use what is it called? Um bromine HP 11 What's the guys Remind me again.

Oh man, see? I got to brush up. I'm going to get embarrassed by these experts. The fire suppression that they use actually uh can't but it will keep it at bay for a little bit. Halon, thank you. Halon fire extinguishing devices.

They use Halon. Appreciate you guys. Look at you. Look at you smarties in the chat, all these Halons. That's not how you spell it, but it's close. Yeah.

So, it's pretty close. Cuz I think I'm just speculating here. I don't know for a fact, so don't don't hold me on this. But I think what's going to happen is we're going to find out from some people that have actually Let's just say they're experts. That there is a real possibility that the plane can fly with lithium ion batteries burning in the cargo bay for an extended period of time. I think that's what we're going to end up finding.

That's always been something that I've been skeptical about. Everybody says, no, there's no way. There's no way. And I'm like but the pole Aren't the cargo play the cargo bay is like built for this and there's whole suppression device system specifically for this? It should be able to last for at least a little while. Mm.

We'll see. Not sure. >> And so, if a lithium battery fire took place in the aircraft, it would have went down immediately. And so, we wanted to be able to prove that theory. So, we we got a scaled down one in 30 a scale aircraft and we lit it on fire to see how long it would last. And it lasted minute minutes. So that that that that was not a scenario that we believe it was possible.

And so >> and batteries into just a small plane and watch it burn up versus putting them in a cargo bay that's rated for batteries and uh and burning them there. Or potentially and this is where we kind of uh compromise a smaller device that could have pulled it off. This is another angle that I think is interesting. I saw this quickly come up. Maybe the fire was connected to an attempted downing and then it failed and that's why they had to use the orbs. It's possible.

The letter to Ashton Forbes basically would say no, this isn't what's going on. But that letter might not that might be disinformation that letter. I think there's a real possibility that they were just trying to take the plane down with the fire and it didn't go down. And that's why the orbs got called in. That actually makes a lot of sense. You think, oh crap, they screwed up the bring the plane down operation.

Now we got to make sure this plane disappears forever somewhere where no one ever finds it. And the other reason why I think there's uh that theory has legs is the cover up was sudden. It was sloppy. The cover up wasn't prepared. Like I think they had to fake the satellite pings and they that's why they had to wait so long to release the satellite pings. Like they waited forever to release satellite pings for a plane that's missing.

That's not normal. That's not what you do in an emergency situation. [clears throat] They had to wait like four days or five days to say the plane went into the South Indian Ocean because they had to they had to spend several days to come up with the location where the plane went. It's crazy. There should be no Everybody should know exactly where the plane was the next day. Well, you have no idea where a Boeing 777 went. What what year is it?

Anyway. >> We believe that it would have been a uh there would have been some kind of uh maybe diversion, uh uh incendiary device that created smoke just to be able to create a that scenario to gain control of the aircraft. Uh Forbes claims that that the the pilot complied, went to went out towards where the the naval ship was and then was intercepted by uh a predator drone. You can see the feed on that video. You can see part of the predator the predator drone on the video and uh and and there's another satellite video of it from two different angles.

So you have two different angles showing the same thing. You see a plane flying with smoking out the back of it and you you see one orb come in and then a second orb come in and a third orb come in. These orbs start circling the aircraft uh in a in a weird pattern of a very not a weird pattern, a very uh um uh synchronized pattern and then they flash, a flash goes and the plane disappears. >> Pretty close. This story doesn't make any sense for the pilot to be in to be in on it.

If you're a pilot, you're not going to sign up for a death mission where you're going to get orbed by some orbs and you're not going to sign up for any mission where your plane's going to be on put on fire either. So the pilot couldn't have been in on it.

So to me, either they had to have told the pilot come here for rescue and they flew there or they had control of the plane or they took control of the plane to bring it to the rendezvous point cuz we see the plane in the Nicobar Islands and this is the direct shot of the real path of the plane. Right before military radar loses the plane, the plane is flying directly at our coordinates. The only thing he gets wrong here is that he says the second one is a satellite video. It's not a video. It was called satellite video.

Now, keep in mind, I recorded this like maybe a year and a half ago. I recorded this well over a year ago. So this is not doesn't have the most new information. This actually could have been before the Gorgon Stare reveal. I don't remember. We'll know when the interview drops because if I knew it's Gordon Gorgon Stare, I'll say it's Gorgon Stare in the interview for sure.

Um so we'll find out. I I actually don't remember. So it's not satellite video. And I'll go ahead and just play it. Cuz there might be new people watching here. This is actually something called Gorgon Stare wide area motion imagery.

Now in the bottom left, you can see half coordinates. Those coordinates are the Nicobar Islands. Yes, those coordinates right there are the Nicobar Islands. It says NROL 22. That's a real relay satellite. That's a real relay satellite.

This is a drone communicating to a relay satellite and it's this is a software system producing real-time video. All right, let me repeat this one more time for you cuz a lot of people are slow out there. It says NROL 22. There are coordinates. That's a straight shot from the real location of the plane. NROL 22 is a real relay satellite.

This is an MQ-9 Reaper drone communicating to a relay satellite. And this is a software program called Gorgon Stare wide area motion imagery that takes photos from a Reaper drone and makes Google Earth. Google Earth, that's essentially what you're looking at here. Video Google Earth. And they can zoom in on like hundreds of locations all at once because it's a software system producing a virtual background. That's why there's a that's why there's a human being with a window on a computer doing this and then they go and close the window.

They're moving the screen around when the screen changes because they're looking at a giant field of view. That's how this system really works in the real world. So do you think somebody faked Gorgon Stare footage? By the way, the other giveaway, which is hilarious, like there's so been so many times the debunkers have just self-owned themselves. The frame rate. Look how jerky it looks.

That is dead on whammy because you can't call this video. Video has to be above a certain frame rate. This is only six frames per second. This is super low frame rate. You would say why would you why would anybody make a video that's super low frame rate? Hoaxer definitely wouldn't make us low frame rate video.

If a hoaxer makes a video, it's going to be exactly the frame rate of the software system that they're using to make the video. It's going to be exactly whatever, 24 frames, whatever the standard is, right? Why is this six frames per second? Because it's a software system building a virtual background. That's why it's not 24 frames per second because there's a software system somewhere, probably computers in Utah or something like that, and they're processing all this imagery in real time, producing a software system that people are logged into and they're watching this.

That's why the video frame rate is so low because if you were to zoom out, you're going to be looking at like a whole city size. Now this is over the ocean, but it ain't Japan. That ain't Japan. That's the Nicobar Islands, 100%. And if you were to zoom out, you would see the Nicobar Islands. You wouldn't see any Mount Fuji Ooh, look at that.

Beautiful chat. Why are they recording? Uh, they didn't randomly catch aliens, guys. So, um, okay, we're going to come back to that. Remind me Elon chat. We're going to talk about Elon and aliens in a second after this. >> One of the interesting things he brought brought up with us was that that uh the plane reappears near the the CIA military base and and when it uh when it does, people spot a burning plane that's that's eyewitnesses of a burning plane going through there in both the disappearance location and the reappearance location which are 1,000 miles away.

Uh, also the cell phones on the the cell phone start pinging uh because it's low enough for the cell phone start pinging so that in in both location >> So, this is I mean this is pretty accurate. Pretty impressive here because this is actually still really relevant and even more relevant now than it was before. We have sightings on both sides of where the plane showed up. They literally teleported an airplane. I'm not just saying that to be outrageous. If I wanted to convince people and not be outrageous, I would just say they annihilated the plane.

But that would make no sense from a physics perspective. They would have to have the exact same opposite antimatter in order to annihilate the plane. Doesn't make any sense. It actually just has to be teleportation. That's the crazy part. So, we have a sighting in the Maldives.

And here's the crazy part about this teleportation. Bob Greenyer was right. It's actually just about donuts and toroids and the way the orbs are spinning around the plane and all of that, it creates a rail gun that shoots exactly backwards. So, we actually know the vector they're teleporting the plane. Their vector teleporting the plane exactly backwards. And that's based on everything you see in the videos, The way the orb spin around the plane, the direction of the orb spin around the plane, all of it.

They're creating a hyper cylinder backwards. Stargate SG-1, uh Battlestar Galactica, right? Do they have warp gates? I think so. Or hyperdrives? I don't know.

You get the point. So honestly, the real location they should be searching is near the Maldives and Diego Garcia military base. Where else can you hide a plane underwater other than near the military base that committed the act? And why is it not actually at the military base? Because there'd be no way to hide it. They just had to have ditched it in the water somewhere.

There was nobody that needed to save on that plane, which is sad to say, but also part of the reason why they need the truth. Those people are probably dead and their family members deserve the truth, which requires their bodies. Those people's bodies are on a plane probably fully intact at the bottom of the water somewhere. Now unfortunately, because I've brought so much attention to this, there's a possibility they've tried to recover this plane and move it and teleport it to the sun or some like that.

If I was the CIA, my number one goal would be teleporting this plane to the sun so that Ashton Forbes can't be proven right. >> She have cell phones pinging for both locations. >> Is that a Is that a fact? >> Uh that's his claim. His claim. I haven't seen a report. This is his claim that the cell phones are pinging >> The cell phones. I haven't really talked about too much about that. I need to add that to the list. The cell phones I don't know what that necessarily means.

Maybe the debunkers were right. Maybe a cell phone can ring when the planes are at the bottom of the ocean. Cuz again, that's the most powerful evidence early on that the plane was just simply not at the bottom of the ocean. How are the phones ringing? How is there a dude on TV showing his phone ringing? I don't really know how to square that.

Yeah, what was it? 19 Uh I can't remember. No, they wrote a statement. A bunch of the family members wrote a statement to the Malaysian government begging them to like look and ask the telecoms why the phones were ringing. They were basically begging them to trace the phones and they wouldn't do it. I mean, if the phone's ringing, it's got to be connecting to a cell tower. >> Well, locations that they and that the family members their statements from the family members that the cell phones continued to ring for up to a week.

Uh so when you call a phone, if it's in the bottom of the ocean, it's not going to ring. It's going to go right to voicemail. But if you call a phone and it's still uh you know in service, it's going to ring and go to voicemail. And so family members claimed those phones were ringing for up to a week.

And uh and so his his claim is that some sort some sort of teleporting technology in these orbs were able to uh capture that plane and and move it to a different location. >> What happened to the rest of the people on the plane? >> We never heard from them again. This has been searched like for years uh for debris and there's been small parts of debris. Some people say it was placed there, but not certainly not in a in a uh finding the aircraft and uh there's no evidence where the aircraft would have went. >> One thing I want to say real quick.

I saw this comment in the chat about how Pudoff knows ask Pudoff. I think I forgot to mention this in the last live stream where I said I figured out how the orbs work. They're definitely dense plasma focused. The geometry gives them away. Actually, Bob Greenyer again was right. That the geometry of the orbs really just comes down to donuts.

And their shared donut structure as well is the secret to how they're doing the teleportation. But now realize knowing that that's the truth, how quickly do you think someone like Hal Pudoff, Charles Chase, Eric Davis, George Miley, the guys that worked on this, the guys that worked on getting the Dirds released, every single one of them recognizes those as dense plasma focus immediately. If I can figure it out with no experience whatsoever right off the street in under three years and figure out exactly the kind of fusion reactors those are, the people that wrote the papers about them are definitely recognizing them.

That's one of my biggest points is I want these people on the record looking at the videos because I can instantly tell if they know what they're looking at or not. It's really hard to lie about that kind of thing and that's why those guys won't go on the record. The reason why they're everybody's so afraid to talk about the videos is they don't want to get caught lying on the record.

They don't want to go on the record and go, I don't know what that is, and then find out later, oh, you're an expert on uh dense plasma focus but you're pretending like you didn't know you didn't recognize it right there. We're going to end up making dense plasma focus reactors and they're going to look like plasma orbs and people are going to go, wait, that that's the same thing in those videos. Maybe not now, maybe not in the near future but eventually we are. You think those guys don't recognize what a free electron laser looks like inside of a fusion reactor?

You think Charles Chase doesn't recognize that? This is why they're so terrified to talk to me by the way. It's not that they're not intellectually superior. They are, all of them. I'll freely admit they're all smarter than me. That's not why they're not afraid to talk to me.

They're afraid to talk to me because they know they know I know the questions that I can ask them that can bury them at any point. They know I know the questions that can bury them at any point because I know what they're hiding. I know exactly what they're hiding. Anyway. So. >> I don't know what I think. I'm skeptical though of that theory. >> Yeah, that's that that actually that that actually is one of the ones I'm I'm slight skeptical about as well.

Uh the video is is very much in question. Uh Ashton Forbes spends his life defending this video. We did have a Hollywood uh producer come on and look at the video and say that the video was was not doctored because of the way the orbs go through the the chemtrail and the the the heart of this >> So oh this >> He's talking about Professor Simon. I don't know if I would call Professor Simon Hollywood director. Uh okay. Now I remember cuz they told me that they reached out to somebody and they were like, oh he knows you.

And he actually supports your idea. I was like, who is it? And they were like, oh it's this guy Professor Simon. I'm like, oh yeah, I know Professor Simon. Who I do think is a serious videographer for sure. His content's really good.

I like it. I was spoofing I was spoofing it like last week. He does his super, you know, emo dramatic thumbnails. I like it. Um But yeah, and the point that he's making right there is actually probably the most powerful point in support of the videos from a VFX perspective, which I'll demonstrate right here. This is the exact thing Professor Simon is looking at.

All you have to do is change the color channel of the videos and you find details in them that are not easily seen by the naked eye. Including this one where you can clearly see the orb displacing the smoke trail. Like clearly. It's not artifact. It's literally just the orb displacing the smoke trail. I actually made this.

All I did was just slow it down and rewind it so you can just see how clear it is when it passes through the smoke trail. That's that's fluid dynamics in three dimensions right there. I think that's the only time the orb actually passes directly through the smoke trail too. They orbit around it, but they spin on weird axes. So I get a lot of messages like this by the way. And 90% of them turn out to be So I don't really entertain a lot of that.

The best way to get my attention is just say what you want to say and if I find it's crazy, probably want to talk to you in private. You know? Anyway, let's go back to the video. I think it's it's almost over here. >> The smoke in the back of the aircraft, chem trail. The smoke in the back of the aircraft, I said that couldn't have been docked there because of that. Uh, however, we couldn't test that.

I I don't have a orb weapon system to test. What we could test was the was the was the fire theory. And we we didn't believe that that that there was a real fire on the aircraft. We believed that it was a diversion to put on a if there was really and the official claim is that there was a lithium battery. But this lithium battery fire, it wouldn't have made it. >> Yeah, and you'd think that if the plane was on fire, there'd be some kind of mayday from the pilot. >> Well, well, well.

So the two of my main points are if I'm right and there really was a fire, you're right, there would have to be a mayday. So where was it? Why was there no mayday? Well, if I'm right, that means there probably was a mayday. And it was probably just classified. Why would they not reveal a mayday?

Um, because they teleported an airplane? If there's a cover up, can you think about why they maybe didn't reveal a mayday? It would kind of reveal what they did. Hey, there's a mayday, but there's no plane. How do you How do you explain to people that there was a mayday call, but we've searched everywhere within 1,000 miles and there's no airplane? Like just no airplane anywhere.

How you going to explain that? They couldn't explain a mayday call, so they had to classify it. That 's why they waited so long to reveal Why wouldn't they reveal all the communications the next day? We got communications of a of people crashing into the ground in real time earlier this week. In real time, we got all the communications. They waited months to reveal the communications.

Why did they wait so long to reveal the communications? Oh, because it was a cover up the whole time. It's not that complicated. >> Yeah. >> Of which there's no record. >> That's right. >> Is Atlantis a real place? >> I believe the >> Whoa. That's a twist. That's a jump around. I'll be honest, you can tell right away Tucker doesn't believe any of that. Tucker's a master gaslighter.

Honestly, he's the best gaslighter. You have to at least give him credit for that. Look, I hated Brett Farve when I was growing up. He beat the hell out of us every year, but you have to respect his game just like Tucker Carlson. You may not like him, but he's the best gaslighter period. And there he is.

He can't even gaslight you on the orb on the orb videos. Can't even gaslight you. Tells you that he probably doesn't really believe it, which is fine. He doesn't need to, but I could probably convince him. I could probably convince him. Okay, let's change gears.

And by change gears, I mean talk about aliens. Oh wait, no. This one is not aliens. Oh wait, this one's aliens. You want aliens first or do you want Diego Garcia first? Just kidding. That was the illusion of choice.

You guys don't have any real choices. I'm the decider chat. Diego Garcia it is. Chat wall, I am banned from the social medias as they say, which is fine. I don't even I didn't want to be I didn't want to be on your social media platform anyway. Eric Weinstein is stealing my content.

The vultures have come in and they're picking my corpse clean. I've only been banned for one day chat. They're already stealing my content, picking me dry. Eric Weinstein says, how do you say London in Farsi? Diego Garcia. Uh [music] okay.

Diego Garcia. Chat, the observers is getting weird. I think we might have times travelers on our hand. Forget this joke at your peril. You were never being anti-war. You just weren't thinking hard about you just weren't thinking about this hard hard-headedly enough.

Complain all you like about forever wars or showing off about being anti-war, fine. But deep down, you hopefully know there never was an anti-war option on the table. Eric Weinstein always comments like this. I have to learn his ways. This is the to me this is one of the most a manipulative ways of talking where you speak in these metaphors where you try to sound make yourself sound profound like you're making a big point. End of the day you're saying, hey, we really had to go to war.

Why? Because it's more complicated than you understand. That's what he's saying here. But no, instead it's got to be this whole post about this question and answer and this joke and then this monologue at the end. He's got a whole monologue here. Just say, hey, look, man, sometimes you have to go to war and sometimes those reasons are above your pay grade.

That's it. That's all. But let's listen to this cuz honestly this is my favorite senator. Don't tell the other senators, chat. Don't tell the other senators I'm not I'm not homosexual, but if this is something he needed just saying. No. Not like that. But I do find him good.

I do find him funny. Here we go. >> Intelligence. >> Here's what I >> John Kerry, chat. >> Complete and total vindication for the plan trusters, chat. Nick Fuentes was wrong. Get it through your grouper skulls. Sorry woke right people, wrong again. Still looking for that first thing you've ever been right about.

It turned out we just destroyed Iran cuz we wanted to. Because we said, oh, if we let them get any more missiles and then they're going to be able to do bad stuff and we're actually not going to be able to stop them. So instead, we're just going to wipe them out right now. And then we did. We killed all their leadership. We killed their president.

We killed uh uh their governance. We killed their nuclear scientists. I mean, what more do we have to kill chat? We're really good at killing people and we killed a lot of people. Okay? And let's not forget yes, we did kill like a whole school of children.

That's horrible. It's not like we were trying to kill the school of children. It just so happens it's like right next to a military base because Iranians are a stupid and b they don't really value their children's lives. So they put them right next to bases to high value targets. Stupid. But we'll own it.

We'll own it. We're not perfect. We're not perfect. Not by a wide margin. In fact, we'll just call it how it is like I just did right there. We just wanted to destroy them because they were going to catch up.

And why does this vindicate us? Cuz this is what I'm saying. We're not afraid of a nuclear weapon. We're afraid they're going to get zero point energy. We're afraid they're going to get weapons that they can just strike people and now they become a power on the world stage and we have to respect them. We had to use our asymmetrical advantage and take them out now before they get to that point.

And that's a hard decision. Because you're basically playing god number one. And number two, you're trying to predict the future. You're saying, hey, are they really going to do this? Like, that's what the data shows. That's what the analysis shows.

That's what my intelligence is telling me. But should we actually I mean, do we do it? This is why I want President Trump at the helm. This is why I want President Rubio at the helm. I want somebody that can make that hard decision and realize we aren't going to have asymmetrical advantage forever. And if we don't, who are we giving this weaponry to?

Who is going to get this technology? Anybody that is going to use this to destroy the planet, they just can't have it. They just can't have it under any circumstances, period. Doesn't matter the cost. It is what it is. That's the political thing that we have to talk about with respect to zero point energy. Is that this is no, hey, just give it away to everybody.

No, we're going to gate keep the out of this. We're going to gate keep the out of zero point energy. You kidding me? Primitives don't get it. Third worlders don't get it. People that have no responsibility don't get it.

People that can't even manage a Discord or a sorry, a a subreddit. You know what I'm talking about. People who can't manage their lives and can't manage subreddits, you don't get you don't get zero point energy. So I hope people understand we're gate keeping the out of this. I've been pretty clear about that, I feel like. Okay, we got some spice we have to address right now.

This is pretty spicy. I won't lie to you. I don't like social media and it doesn't really bother me that I'm banned. But I did want to comment on this. This I actually felt the compulsion to do a little posterino action. Elon Muscarino says, it troubles me greatly that we have not yet seen any signs of aliens.

Is this guy trolling, chat? and then the next day coming out going okay Republicans, let's work together. Dude, what are you doing, Elon? We have seven UFO file releases. Why are you pretending like they didn't release seven files on UFOs? Your buddy is with the president. This is such just a weird comment to just even make without addressing the elephant in the room.

And also there's so many different ways to unpack this. Is he specifically wording it about aliens? So lots of questions about this. Why is he making weird comments about this that are super vague? And who's even replying to on this? What even is this?

Is this Is this a music video? >> large and rookie where [music] they had wow and you've kept vigil for it every night. >> This is the Elon Musk is watching? Chat, I got I got questions. You know what? Maybe it's a good thing if the Democrats prosecute Elon Musk. This is what I'm saying. I'm like the CIA, chat.

Look, is it objectively wrong for Democrats to prosecute Elon Musk? Yes. Subjectively wrong. But on the plus side, maybe it'll wake his ass up and he'll realize zero point energy exists. Right? You take the bad and maybe there'll be a little good comes along with it.

This is why I'm an optimist. Okay, let's go back to this part cuz this is also maybe even more interesting. See, I need the TV screen. I'm going to try to get a TV screen set up so that I can just like point to it and then maybe giant letters. I feel like that'll be more effective content. Dylan Borland which by the way I'm going to be real talk to Dylan Borland. Dylan Borland makes me sad Chad because I see a guy that doesn't really have anything going on and I go why did you join up with the woke retards?

They just used you up and spit you out. They just used up Dylan Borland and they spit him out and they used him for content and now he doesn't have a job. Now he's got nothing going on. Now he's burned all his prospects being some weirdo alien guy. And here's the worst part you're going to do all that and then you're going to try to take some shot at me about why would they be recording with a drone when you have stealth technology? And you make yourself look like a complete doofus now too.

So now even the serious people that actually know what we have none of them are going to take you seriously either. Cuz those people know I'm right and you go out there and look like a jackass when you're like uh I don't think that Gorgon stare and litany pot are real because we would use stealth technology if we did. That's your that's your deep intel analysis. If that's the kind of analysis you were doing for our intelligence community then I'm really glad you're not on the intelligence community anymore cuz that's called incompetence.

Now that being said I would have been happy to help Dylan Borland out. This is why all these people that just for no reason unsolicited attack me it's just all self-inflicted. I was actually willing to help all these people out the whole time hand them disclosure on a silver platter and instead of just grabbing what I was giving them they spit in my face. They spit directly in my face. So even the good guys who are trying to expose this but anyway, what did he have to say? So Dylan Borland says, I say this with all due respect.

A lot of people in the intelligence community saw the email thread with you and the other DOD contractors being shown things that you and the rest acknowledged weren't us and don't know what they are or where they're from. I'll let the I'll let the people that went to you tell that one. Damn, dog. Damn, Elon. You going to let him talk to you like that? Chat, this is where we have to get ourselves involved.

This is a jelly fight right here. This is where y'all need to be in here replying, boosting this. We need to pick a fight right here. This is some that's verifiable. This is Dylan Borland saying, I saw your name on an email and a whole bunch of other people did too. So you're acting really weird here cuz you said there's flying around no one can explain.

Now here's my take on this. This makes this actually vindicates us even more. This is exactly what I'm talking about. Elon Musk doesn't think it's aliens. If this story is true, it's pretty clear what Elon Musk thinks that what he got shown was not aliens. And this actually makes you wonder, why has he been avoiding the MH370 video so much?

Maybe he does know about fusion technology. Maybe he's been sworn to secret about it. It's pretty odd that he's playing this angle of aliens here and he's now we find out he definitely has been shown UFOs, but the context wasn't necessarily aliens. The context was we don't know what they are or where they're from, which means leaves the door open for black projects. Leaves the door wide open for black projects. This is very interesting.

But now, why does this vindicate us? This vindicates us because I'm the one out here saying these alien people have no idea what they're talking about. This Dylan Borland guy doesn't know what the hell he's talking about. Oh yeah, you saw some videos of some orbs flying around. I believe you. That doesn't prove aliens are real.

This is exactly why these people have never gotten disclosure. Listen closely. If you're Dylan Borland, if you are one of these disclosure people that's been hanging on these people's words, waiting for aliens to just get disclosed, the reason why they've never gotten what they want is that they're wrong. Is that when they look at orbs flying around in the sky, their mind says, that's alien technology. Why are those aliens flying around like that? And that's wrong.

That's why you're not getting what you want. Is that clear? That's fusion reactors flying around. Humans can build fusion reactors. It's called classified. Why do you think you're not getting what you want?

Why do you think you keep getting stonewalled on something stupid like aliens? Cuz you've misinterpreted what you saw on a video screen and you are inserting the gaps with your own mind. It's pretty clear that's what's going on. That's why Elon Musk is being weird. That's why the Trump administration is revealing orb videos, but nothing with aliens. That's why they're releasing the Dirds, the Defense Intelligence Reference Documents, which apparently I'm one of the only people in the world that's actually read them.

Because we've got some crazy advanced technology. Now, it doesn't mean that aliens can't be real, but you got to just stop thinking that just because you see something you don't understand that it's aliens. That why we're getting anywhere. Okay. Let me see what else I got here. Um [clears throat] So we were going to look at this Veritasium video, but what's I think we're getting a little too late on this.

Maybe we can watch a clip or two. I think I want to look at this though, which is one of my old posts, which is on time. Now I made a somewhat inflammatory and possibly just straight up incorrect post on physics talking about that the Ethernet is going to have zero lag. That's an extremely controversial take because right now the no communication theorem would say that faster than light signaling is not possible. And what that means is you should never be able to get to zero lag.

That no matter what in our classical reality you can't communicate, send a message from this point to this point without transmitting through a medium. Now we know that's wrong. So that's the reason why I'm being intentionally uh kind of rage baiting is that if there is an ether then we can create an ether net. An Ethernet where two things can communicate. Now we know 100% that this is true, objectively true. You say, how do I know that?

Because I watched an airplane get teleported and it's the exact same mechanism. If an airplane can get teleported from here to over here then you can communicate. That's breaking the no signal theorem. This is a fully massive object disappearing from over here over here. That's information being sent, not just those spin correlations line up. No, this is straight up information and a straight up object being moved.

So that means that we can and we will objectively have a zero lag ethernet in the future. So for my gamers out there, get excited. Get excited because zero lag ethernet is coming. I don't know exactly when. They're going to call it the quantum internet, but it will be objectively the ethernet because ethernets can't work without ether. Anyway, I digress.

Time travel. I actually reached out to this guy like two years ago for an interview, which I got an initial response, but then I'm pretty sure he Googled me and was like, yeah, I'm not talking to this guy. [laughter] Az of Sham Elitcer. I don't care if that's how you say his name. That's how we're saying it. The reason why I like this guy is cuz he talked to Kurt Gimmell. >> Relativity. >> And he explained that the double the I think it was the quantum eraser or some version of the double slit experiment or of the EPR experiments, he said shows negative energy.

He says if you add up these paths, the one the path that the the thing took and the path that it like virtually took, you realize one must be negative energy. That's the long and short of it. Which I love that idea. >> The special in general made a revolution in our look of space time, but it came with a price. It killed time. This morning I was in bed. I hope to be back in bed late at night.

Here now I am with you. There is something very unique to this now. We feel it. It's now. It's important and it's what we are what we are what we experience. Soon enough, just now it became past. It fleeted.

And then the future will become will become present, which will become past. Relativity killed all of that. Einstein all his life was unhappy about it. What he said few years before he died to Carnap is the fact that we to give up the notion of the now is a matter of painful but inevitable resignation. So he wasn't happy with it but he took it and embraced it. I believe that physics to this day is missing something very fundamental about time.

So I think that the block universe although it's very fruitful and it helps solve many problems in relativity, it's not only wrong but can I say it's stupid? >> [laughter] >> This is weird cuz the block universe I think I don't get what he was trying to say at the end cuz the block universe I think is consistent with what he was saying there. So what is he saying there is that a lot of people have this idea that there's a now and that we're all in this now and the now is moving forward together. But that's objectively wrong. That's not what's happening at all.

That's not what's happening and it's very important to understand the difference because it makes a huge difference on how reality plays out. What's really happening is that everybody's in their own time bubble and actually the time bubble up here where my brain is is a slightly different time bubble than where my feet are. So what what changes the time bubble? How close you are to the center of mass, how close you are to the Earth. The Earth is the largest gravitational well that we're near and the Earth is dictating our flow of time.

So what that means is that time actually is not a fixed now that's moving forward for everybody the same. Turns out that it's moving forward at different rates [snorts] for everybody. So there really is no now. My now and your now aren't necessarily the same. The only reason why it even seems like they're the same, the reason why we're hypnotized shout out to Hypno Bro. Rest in peace Hypno Bro.

Pour a little out for you. The reason why we're hypnotized is we're all on planet Earth and when we're on the surface of planet Earth, all of our relative bubbles of time are pretty much the same, almost indistinguishable. So it appears as though we're all sharing some passage of time because all of our flows of time are similar. But if we weren't all on the Earth, we would see this effect much more commonly, much more often. Now why is this important? Cuz this opens the door to time travel.

You can take a very simple thought experiment. You can say, okay, wait, if we're all moving forward at different rates, what if I just slow myself down like to zero? Or what if I speed myself up? Now in theory, I should be able to jump to the future. If I change my rate of time and slow my rate of time and speed up the outside rate of time relative to mine, then I should be able to speed up time and jump to the future and now it's a thousand years in the future, but I'm still the same age. That's what general relativity proves is possible.

Proves it's possible. You believe in general relativity, you believe that's possible. So this is why it's so crazy when people say time travel's not real, space time manipulations not real. If you believe in gravity, you believe in space time manipulation. We're experiencing it all the time. And when we're talking about gravity manipulation, we're really talking about changing that rate of time, changing that dial.

That's really what we're talking about. If we're shielding the gravity, maybe we're lessening it. If we're increasing the gravity, maybe we're increasing it. [clears throat] So this is what opens the door to them being able to teleport the plane. So let me think, what else do I want to chat about here tonight? I don't know if we're going to be able to watch this video. I think it's kind of too long.

Let me see what else I wanted to look at here. Um. Ooh, that was a Hal Putoff link. We may have to look at that real quick. Yeah, okay. Let's take a look at this.

Is this a Hal Putoff response? Ooh, I think it is. I never saw this. [clears throat] This is ZPF Technologies, also known as Douglas Miller. Physics of Consciousness panel discussion. M3 Capital. Oh, this is the whole interview.

There's Hal Putoff chat. There's Hal Putine right in the middle. Right in the middle. The goat. For the record, if you don't know, I am actually the I like to talk about it. I'm the president of the Hal Putoff fan club.

I know some of you guys think that you're big fans. I have a shrine. I have a shrine. I might be a little psycho. >> Well, from the experiment that I just described, I recognized that, you know, that couldn't be based on ordinary electromagnetic effects cuz they're just not going to get through all that shielding. And so it turns out that when you dig into electromagnetic theory and go down into the quantum level, then at the quantum level you have potentials. And it turns out that at the quantum level the fields are really secondary.

It's really the potentials that that change things. So the Iran >> Holy chat. There he's saying it. It's not the fields that are fundamental. You say, Ashton, what keeps the magnets stuck to the to the refrigerator? The electromagnetic fields.

The magnetic fields keep the magnets stuck to the refrigerator. That's wrong. That's just what it appears like. That's just what it feels like. The truth is it's the potentials. The potentials are guiding the path.

That's what the real primitive is, the potentials. And that's what the Aharonov-Bohm effect proves that it's actually the potentials are the real thing. The potentials can actually change reality even when there's no fields at all. Which we think wait, but there's no fields. How can a magnet stick to a fridge with no fields? That would be the analogy.

Doesn't make any sense. >> Aharonov-Bohm effect and the use of toroids and all that kind of thing uh >> Use of toroids? The The toroid thing If we can rewrite reality, if I go back in time and I can rewrite reality, I'm changing the toroid thing. No offense, but it's just kind of stupid. Why is a donut the mystical geometric shape? Really? Donut?

It It literally feels like you're trolling me. Is bacon going to be the next uh secret uh sacred physics? Donuts? Homer Simpson donuts are the secret to reality of the universe? I'm not sure I want to be right, chat. Maybe I'll debunk myself.

I just don't want the donuts to be the answer. It is what it is. >> You know, raised this whole issue that uh there are scalar and vector potential effects that can have real effects on the environment uh where there are no electromagnetic fields involved at all. So that that's what set me off in a a separate thing which I mean right now I have a company called you know called Quan Com where we're investigating the possibility of using uh such underlying quantum potentials for uh information transfer. So we'll see where that goes. >> We're going to use the quantum potentials for information transfer.

So, the we're going to use no electromagnetic fields to transfer information. That's a direct analogy to the teleportation of the plane, by the way. So, when I say there's going to be a quantum internet, uh, this is what this dude's talking about. And by the way, if he's talking about this publicly, means they already had this 20 years ago in the military. They already had this 20 years ago. So, one of the other things, let me see if I'm how banned I am on social media, that I posted about right before I got banned was about the quantum internet.

I actually couldn't find I PolyMarket's kind of not a great source, guys, but you know what? If I can do a little engagement farming, I'll do a little. Breaking, NASA makes US history with first ever quantum link established between aircraft and ground. So, right now, if you want to understand what's happening, cuz a lot of people look at this and like what what the hell does this mean? And the reason why we're all struggling to try to understand what this means is that it we have we're at a breaking point where classic physics is struggling to keep up with what is actually happening.

The only way this makes any sense is if we have some sort of two-way communication system. But what we're saying now to get around having to rationalize that is we're saying, well, it's not actually communicating information because theoretically that's impossible. It's just, um, it's creating a state that's being shared between the two places. It just so happens that this is just turning exactly the opposite of this. You're like, but that's like communication though. They're like, no, it's different.

It's it's just the states being replicated. You're like, okay, but it feels like I can communicate. And they're like, and you're like so you're like, why can't I communicate with that though? And they're like, because it's impossible. They're like, but it's actually doing it though. They're like, no, but that's impossible.

That's so that's essentially where we're at right now. We're at right now at a point where even the people that agree quantum entanglement is real disagree that its real effects are really doing things. So what's going to happen the next level is it's not just going to be, oh, we're just we're just mimicking the state over here. It's going to be full on information transfer. Full on information transfer at light speed or beyond light speed. That's the whole point, beyond light speed.

Instantaneous. Now the follow-up question is can we go back in time? That's what you all really want to know. Every single person you all ask me can we go back in time? And now the answer is maybe. The answer is maybe because most likely if we can go back in time, you have two options.

Listen closely. Number one, multiverse. If there is a multiverse, then you can do literally anything. You can go back to some other universe that's back in 1902. You can go see dinosaurs, whatever the hell you want to do. If there's a multiverse, you can do anything you want.

Personally, I don't like the idea of the multiverse. Just feels like cheating. But you might call me a hypocrite and say, well, adding an extra dimension is also cheating, but you don't have a problem with that. Fair. I've always said I'm going to be a hypocrite. I don't like it still.

Number two option. You can only go back in time if you did go back in time. So if you see an older version of yourself walking around, you'll know you went back in time in the future. If you see an older version of yourself, if Ashton Forbes from the future knocks on the door right now, I'll know that in the future I go back in time. I'll know immediately. The moment I see myself, I'll be like, okay, I guess I could I guess I'm a time traveler.

I haven't time traveled yet, but I know I 'm going to. That would be the only version of time travel that's allowed. Some, they call that a self-consistent or a closed time-like loop. One in which it seems impossible, but as long as it's self-consistent, it's fine and it's allowed. So as long as I grow up and then go back in time and complete the loop, there's no problem with that. You're not breaking time.

You're not breaking causality. It seems weird, seems like it's cheating, but it's not actually breaking causality. So there are what I'm getting at is there are ways where you can allow time travel that does not break causality. This is what people struggle with cuz they think if you're going to time travel, you now must allow breaking of causality. But there's a middle road where you can time travel and and causality does not get broken. It is weird, but there's a lot of weird stuff, a lot of weird stuff in physics.

So we're not going to dig into the Veritasium video tonight. I apologize. We ran out. Felony Physics has been canceled, has been banned. Banned. And we do not have a live stream on Monday either.

But as I've teased multiple times, I have something big in the works. And it's the biggest thing I've ever done. I'm investing my own personal money in this to make sure that this happens and this gets done right. And my personal view on it now, having gotten a little more information about this whole situation in this interview, is that it's even bigger than I thought. What I'll say is people came like with a plan to talk to me that they had already considered and communicated amongst themselves.

And you realize like wow, for people to get permission from the government and to be and to be willing to talk about what we talk which is a literal cover up and a missing plane. I don't know exactly what they're going to say, but boy, am I excited to have the conversation and for you guys to listen to it. So my plan is just get those get those cameras rolling, get those cameras rolling, don't stop them rolling, and then you just tell me what you need me to edit out.

Just tell me what you need me to edit out if you implicate the government in a major conspiracy. [laughter] Anyway, guys. Okay. Um I will just speak briefly about this video though because I think it deserves it. Where do I have it up in the background? Here it is. We are going to review I think this video, but I think what I'm going to do is I'm just going to take some clips that we'll review next week, probably on Wednesday when I'm back, maybe Friday next week.

This is the best Veritasium video that I've seen. This is probably a top five, maybe top three ever Veritasium video. So first I got excited because I see quantum physics with my own eyes. And then what you find out about this video is that it's all about phase transitions, as in the same kind of phase transition that our plane is doing. Because what we find out is that at low temperatures, when we get to the temperatures where zero point energy takes over, we see physics break down. Physics acts the opposite of what you would expect.

Lord Kelvin thought when you cool down your liquid, your gas, and you cool it down enough, you'll get to infinite resistivity. He thought you're going to get infinite resistance. And he was exactly wrong. It was the exact opposite. It turns out you hit this critical point and now everything just goes like spontaneously reorganizes is the best way to explain it. Superfluid, superconductivity, all these quantum effects, Bose-Einstein condensates.

I finally know what that is. A Bose-Einstein condensate is taking actual atoms and getting the atoms to act like a quantum system. Full-on atoms. And if you can get that to happen, what's this secret of this? What does this spontaneous order, spontaneous phase transition tell us? It tells us we can do controlled fusion. When I'm watching this whole Veritasium video explain superconductivity, superfluidity, spontaneous reorganization, I'm going, holy how can you not figure out fusion if you have this?

If you find spontaneous order, you're going to be able to do fusion easily. That's the holy grail to unlocking fusion. Then I'm watching it and I'm going, yeah, superconducting harmonic orbs, exactly. They figured it out. So check out this Veritasium video. We're going to watch some clips from it next week.

Probably the best Veritasium video I've seen in a very long time. And now, especially if you watch my content, you'll enjoy it even more because you'll see everything is electric charge. Positive charge, minus charge. And when you get to the quantum level, you realize it's still exactly the same. At the quantum level, the reason why you see these quantum effects is electric charge, positive and minus charge, all of it is. And all of it is conservation.

And these things cause anti-gravity effects. They cause anomalous quantum effects. So the moral of the story before we close out is that these effects that we see in UFOs are clearly quantum effects. They're just quantum effects that have been scaled up. If it's aliens or if it's us, it's just quantum it's just advanced science, advanced technology, not alien physics, not alien technology, just normal physics, just smart physics, very very smart. Let's go to our super chats.

We don't even have to thank the X chat anymore chat. They're gone. Pilled chat, thank you so much pilled chat and Methyl who posted the gif of the or gif. I don't know which one's correct. Fight about it chat. Posted the gif of the smoke being disturbed.

I should probably post that video of the smoke being disturbed by the orb more often cuz that's the probably the most compelling point for why nobody would ever think to fake fully volumetric 3D uh fluid dynamics in a hoax video. Rumble chat. Whoa, we got everybody popping off in the rumble chat. Double M's laughing cat, K Sierra, SM Ash pause, Nick a backer, John Tims or Tim, Cool Rog, nice to see you guys. And uh Concho how do I say this? How do you guys have the hardest names ever?

Concordian, Concordian. Concordian gifts the $1. Yes, even for $1. Uh we respond. Said Ashton, Seat Green Mountain part three from two weeks ago on the Exo Politics Today channel here on Rumble. JB claims to have been to Green Mountain and seen how they control the orbs with their minds.

Ah, I did actually watch part of that. Now here's the thing. It's interesting, everybody is I was going to make a comment about this. I guess we're going to. Everybody's on me about They really want me to believe that they're controlling these orbs with their minds. I can just tell I can feel it in you guys.

I told you guys I have psychic powers myself. I have remote viewing powers. I can feel your thoughts. You all want me to believe that there is people, precogs in a tub somewhere and they're controlling the orbs with their minds and they're going, Whoa, get that plane. I'm going to be real with you, chat. I don't think so.

I think it's just AI. I think it's just Isn't AI just an easier answer to that? You can have Why have precogs in a tub somewhere when you can just have a machine in a computer with autopilot? It's going to be way more accurate. So for me, I'm not down with it. Though I respect people's beliefs on it and I could be convinced if you present evidence of somebody summoning some orbs or moving the orbs around with their minds and and doing it in a scientific way.

Not like, Hey, I'm just going to say it and then I'll show you the one time where it acted the way I thought. Like doing something scientific, then I'll believe it. I don't think that bar is going to be met because I don't think it's very scientific. I think the more scientific thing is it's just a freaking drone and they've just got an AI computer flying it around in geometric patterns. The same way where we're going to have fusion reactors where AI is going to be managing the fusion confinement and fusion reactor. Same deal.

Anyway, just my thought. Chaotic good. I've been suspended before. Honestly, I don't think I think how it works is that there's an AI algorithm and once you've had a certain number of reports, it triggers a message to the AI algorithm. AI algorithm just looks at your post without any context and it sees if you are violating it, it just it just bans you automated. There's no way there's no humans that are actually reviewing all these posts.

It's all just AI automated. And so they've realized that they can game the system by just having people all they they only need like a dozen people to report you, maybe even less. So for me, if I were to even push back, it would make no sense to have like 30,000 people report someone. That's just going to look like you're obviously brigading them. But if you only have like five or 10 people report someone, it just goes unseen. It doesn't get noticed.

Uh they yeah, and they bait me. They know what they're doing, guys. They know exactly what they're doing. I just don't care. So I just go right into it. My whole thing is exactly what I'm saying.

I just shine a light on these people and I show them who they are and they hate it every time. The very moment you show these people who they are, they try to get you banned because they hate themselves. If they were to apply their own standards to themselves, you know, they would do the things that I say that they're going to do to themselves. That's [clears throat] the whole point, pointing out their own hypocrisy. And [Omitted by 4Orbs: 2:01:36 to 2:03:03, a dispute that names private individuals. The full stream is on YouTube.]

It works out of my favorite. By the way, I am going to lie. Full warning doesn't count as a lie because I'm telling you about it ahead of time. And yes, Billy No Downside, yo, what up? I'm going to say that the government banned me to censor me from telling the truth about their fusion reactors. Why?

Because nobody can tell the truth either way and then if the redditors admit that they just, you know, mass reported me, then they'll be outing themselves. So now they're in the catch 22. Now I can go ahead and say, yep, government's banning me. They didn't want to know about I'm my felony physics pushed them too far. 7-day ban for talking about science. That's what happened.

Anybody says otherwise they'll have to admit to it. It's got to be the truth. I showed you guys the post. That's Does that seem 7-day ban worthy to you? Not to me. Anyway, thank you guys so much. Oh, we got another one at the last second.

Marky Pie won't let me do a super test test test. And I'll add one more test. I think it did let you do the super Marky Pie. And Marky Pie, I appreciate you. I would totally look for your super chat. Oh, you you were smart. You did another one. What was the TAE news from the other day?

Did they have news? Let me look. Since [snorts] you gave a super chat, we will go ahead and stop the whole live stream for you. This is how I roll. Let's see what we have for news. Um, Trump Media Group Technology announces effectiveness form S4 registration and proposal of merger.

I don't know. Let's go ahead and just see. We're only going to do one. Marky Pie, $2 earns you one thing. Brand new. This is like what?

Yesterday. Trump Media Group. By the way, I'm invested in this. I think I What did I start? 25 50,000? A lot.

And it's not going well, chat. It's going horribly, if I'm being perfectly honest with you. And I don't regret even a minute of it. I don't regret a minute of it because I want all of my money in Fusion. I want I literally want all of my money. Forget No This is definitely not stock advice, by the way.

No diversification. All in on Fusion. And if Fusion doesn't work out, then I guess I'm going to be a homeless person. I guess I'm just going to be a homeless person, chat, if Fusion doesn't work out. Anyway. Trump Media Group says operator of the social media platform Truth Social It's totally normal, guys.

Democrats, AOC, please please please do not ruin this merger for me. I'm literally begging you, AOC. My hair will be purple tomorrow. Just let this merger go through. It's totally normal for a social media company to buy a Fusion company. That happens every day, chat.

People are trying to say, Oh, this is corruption. It's inside information. They They know about zero point energy and they're capitalizing on it. That's all That's conspiracy talk. That's conspiracy talk, chat. That's all fake.

This is nothing weird about this. I can I can list at least maybe a company that's bought another company before. Makes sense. Anyway, social Truth Social bought TTE Fusion Company. And we announced our registration statement S 4 Oh. What does that mean, though?

Does that mean something? Related to the previously announced merger has been declared effective by the United States Commission. As a result, Trump Media Group has filed a definitive proxy statement prospectus and consent solicitation statement. What does this mean? OMG. Wait, is it done?

Is it over? Wait, hold on. What's happening? Uh, this Okay, wait. This is today. Okay, I don't know what this means, but I'm pretty sure it's good, chat.

I'm pretty sure this means AOC can't ruin this for us. Let's not Let's not jinx it. Let's not count our chickens before they're hatched. But I might be an investor in a fusion company, chat. I might officially be an investor in a fusion company. So you're going to have to go ahead and put expert and fusion company investor next to my title soon.

It's [clears throat] coming. Okay. [sighs] Wait, did more super chats come in? See, now you guys figured me out. I'm going to have to change this up cuz I do the super chats at the end. So now you all wait to the end and you start sneaking them in right when I'm about to close down the live stream. Okay, I see I see you.

S Fleischer Great stream. We need some memberships. Oh, I forgot about the memberships. Okay, I'll try to get the memberships just for you, Steven Fleischer. I'm only going to have one tier of membership, one $5 tier of membership because I'm lazy. I could give you the $1,000 membership extra package.

You get the special treatment. Me love you long time. But no. Says custom emojis would be so much fun. I'll gift the first 50 memberships. Damn, maybe I got to increase that price. 50 memberships.

Steven Fleischer, I just said they're $5 a pop, bro. Chill out. Got to chill. Zaparoo says fantastic felony physics. No, this is not felony physics. Felony physics has been banned, chat.

We can't use those words anymore. Not until I have been released from prison. Then felony physics will come back. You thought You thought that it was all talk. You thought honky hood was all talk, chat. Uh-uh.

I'm from the streets, chat. I'm from the streets. Starting felony physics tattoo fund. Yes, I need a big FF here and people will be like, is that for the Fantastic Four? Uh-uh. That's felony physics when I did hard time.

Hard time banned from Twitter. Y'all Y'all don't even know the struggle. Anyway, have a great night, MH370X. I love you guys. We'll be back on Wednesday. Peace out everybody.

Later. Oh wait, which one I'm going to do for the outro? Um How do I change this one? Okay, let's do this one. >> [music] >> Out in the fields where the skies are wide. Talking about a journey [music] through the cosmic ride. Einstein and Thorne, they set [singing] the stage for a trip through time across the space age.

Wormholes [music] connect distant points in space, traversable paths to a far off place. No black holes pull, no crushing [music] weight, just a cosmic tunnel to a distant gate. Talking wormholes, stargates, [music] negative energy. Travel through the cosmos, it's our destiny. MH370, where did it go? Boeing 777 through a wormhole flow.

We're talking wormholes, stargates, [music] negative energy. Travel through the cosmos, it's our destiny. MH370, where did it go? Boeing 777 [music] through a wormhole flow. >> [music] >> Exotic [music] matter, negative energy's the key to stabilize the wormhole for you and me. Quantum [music] vacuum squeezed so tight, creating conditions for this wondrous flight. [music] Static fields and lasers in the lab they play, generating forces in a new kind of way. Gravitational squeezing, Casimir's force, [music] negative zones we need to stay the course. >> Talking wormholes, stargates, negative [music] energy.

Travel through the cosmos, it's our destiny. MH 370, [music] where did it go? Boeing 777 through a wormhole flow. Thin shell formalism [music] plates so fine, spherical geometry we realign. Energy [music] conditions that we must defy. Force stable wormhole, let's give it a try. [music] [music] Unknown forces balancing [music] the plates, creating the throat, opening gates.

From Earth to the [music] stars in a single bound, a shortcut through space profound. Engineers [music] and dreamers hold the key to future worlds and what we could be. With science [music] in hand, we forge ahead through the cosmic paths that we now tread. We're talking wormholes, stargates, negative [music] energy. Travel through the cosmos, it's our destiny. MH 370, [music] where did it go?

Boeing 777 through a wormhole flow. From the fields to [music] the stars, we break the chains. Understanding the universe, we make the gains. Lord Horak [music] shines bringing truth to light. Through his music we'll explore the night. With wormholes and stargates, our path is clear.

Exploring