To Make Gravity You Have to Make Music
Summary
The host, Ashton Forbes, analyzes a scientific paper by David Froning, Terence Barrett, and George Miley regarding 'specially conditioned EM fields' for inertial electrostatic confinement (IEC) fusion. He argues that the paper's description of using gravity to reduce the Coulomb barrier is direct proof of a technology he has long claimed exists: the ability to manipulate gravity to facilitate fusion.
Forbes interprets the authors' discussion of 'SU2 force fields' and 'polarization modulation' as evidence of a closed-loop system that produces over-unity energy and free energy, effectively solving an engineering challenge that occurred over a decade ago.
Forbes connects this technical data to the disappearance of General McCasland, asserting that McCasland was the creator of this technology and that his sacrifice was necessary for its development.
He interprets the paper's mention of 'undulators' and 'wiggler' mechanisms as a metaphor for 'making music' to create gravity, suggesting that precise plasma control is the key to generating gravity beams. The video concludes with the speculation that this technology allows for self-stabilizing fusion reactions, creating a 'little sun' in the palm of one's hand, which Forbes claims explains the behavior of UAP orbs.
Key Claims (5)
A paper by H. David Froning, Terence Barrett and George Miley explores using polarization-modulated SU(2) electromagnetic fields to reduce the input energy of inertial electrostatic confinement fusion, with parametric estimates of a 10-20-fold reduction; Forbes reads these fields as gravity beams lowering the Coulomb barrier.
Evidence: Paper by David Froning, Terence Barrett, and George Miley on 'specially conditioned EM fields to reduce nuclear fusion input energy'
Forbes argues the technology implies a closed loop: a gravity beam lowers fusion input energy, fusion energy powers the gravity beam, and the system produces over-unity energy.
Evidence: Forbes' reading of the Froning, Barrett and Miley paper
Reading the paper's plasma-injector design, Forbes calls it the 'ion pumpy thing' and links it to General McCasland, asking 'How can it not be General McCasland?' and telling him 'your sacrifice will not be in vain.'
Evidence: Forbes' reaction while reading the Froning, Barrett and Miley paper
The paper's reference to 'undulators' and 'wiggler' mechanisms implies that creating gravity requires 'making music' through precise plasma control.
Evidence: Paper by David Froning, Terence Barrett, and George Miley
The paper speculates that removing the grid could let converging SU(2) ion beams form a deep potential well; Forbes reads this as a self-stabilising fusion reaction, a 'little sun' that feeds itself.
Evidence: Paper by David Froning, Terence Barrett, and George Miley
Video Details
- Published
- October 21, 2026
- Duration
- 17:40
- Views
- 5,661
- Claims Extracted
- 5
- Theories
- 1
- References
- 3
People Mentioned
Full transcript
Show
specially conditioned EM fields to reduce nuclear fusion input energy. Uh what? So, the very thing that I've been saying they can do, we've been trying to find the as much scientific proof to back up the pseudo science claims that I make on social media. This one's pretty much on the nose, exactly what I've been saying once again, is they can reduce the Coulomb barrier using gravity. Specially conditioned electromagnetic field is gravity. And uh reducing fusion input energy needs is basically the same as reducing the Coulomb barrier.
If you reduce the Coulomb barrier, it requires less energy to make fusion happen. So, maybe they're being coy, or maybe it's just an alternative mechanism to accomplish the same thing, but it's the wording-wise, it says the exact same thing. Who are the authors? Well, that's interesting. David Froning. The goat.
David Froning chat. And who is that with him in addition to Terrence Barrett? Who helped him to figure out the polarization of the electromagnetic fields? George Miley. Well, now I know why George Miley won't return my calls. In addition to being like 97.
Yeah. You wonder why do you have a cold fusion expert a cold fusion expert and a gravity manipulation expert get together, and they come out and they have a little baby, and the little baby is a uh cool a cool fusion plasma baby that can do gravity manipulation. He says if these ions become embedded in the SU2 force fields of the weak interactions in atomic nuclei, this drives the ions closer and closer until the fusion finally begins. I mean, to me that's like saying we're going to make a gravitational well and your fusion just going to suck in and then happen.
Going to make a little black hole. Cuz that's what they doing. When they're reducing the Coulomb barrier, what are we doing? So we're saying, "Hey, we've got these two ions. They can't get any closer. They're repelling each other.
They're both exactly the same charge, so they repel." Okay, I'm going to shrink the distance between them. I'm going to shrink the distance between them and I'm going to make their paths intersect. Because when you manipulate gravity, what you're doing is you're changing the paths of their lines. Their lines are parallel and I'm going to make their lines go like this. So now they go forward and then they intersect.
That's what you do when you manipulate gravity. So that's all. So that's equivalent to reducing the Coulomb barrier. Think about it however you want. I don't care. That's what they're doing.
That's how you manipulate gravity to do fusion. That's how you manipulate gravity to do fusion. Okay, so we do this fusion, blah blah blah. What does it do? Parametric fusion performance estimates indicated 10-20-fold reduction in input energy. If the SU2 gravity beams could lessen ion repulsions over distances of two to three orders of magnitude greater than the distances where ions fuse.
I called it. I've been I'm vindicated every single day these days. Right there, you can reduce the Coulomb barrier. It says it right there. Reduce the barrier to the point where ions will fuse. You get fusion.
They use gravity to make fusion. The fusion produces the energy. The energy gets drived back to make the gravity beam. That's the engineering cycle. Let me boil it down for you. Use gravity beam to make fusion happen at low cost. Take the energy from fusion.
Feed that back to your system. Have that then go and make your gravity beam. And now you have a nice little closed system producing over unity. Producing free energy. It's an engineering challenge, but they solved it like over a decade ago. Pretty cool.
There's essentially no one. If you can find them, go ahead and find them. Cuz yes, there's other zero-point energy influencers, Nassim Haramein, but there is nobody talking about connecting fusion and zero-point energy and gravity manipulation in this way. They may theorize that you could use gravity to help do fusion, but I'm saying straight up they're integrating them. They're integrating them. Okay.
Bunch of math. Ooh, right here. Oh, I forgot about this. There it is. You say, "How do you make?" The question is, "How do you make the gravity beam?"
Gra- emitted energy wave change polarization with respect to time? So, if you look at this, that's it's almost like it has to fan out. I believe the pattern that this creates is a helix pattern. I think it is. Because that's what they always say. They say you want to create some kind of helix pattern, whatever this is right here, whatever you call this.
Maybe that is a helix pattern, I'm not sure. Rapid change in electric field vector direction and magnitude over a very short time and a very short distance. Oh, okay. So, it's rapidly changing. Like it's super high up here and then it's super low. It's like So, they're just stretching it back and forth, basically.
Yeah, if you look at it though, imagine you were riding this like a roller coaster. Imagine you're riding this like a roller coaster. You're like, "Whoa! Whoa! Whoa!" That's what they're saying.
That's the effect. They're like, "Oh, this riding of the roller coaster is what's causing this." Yeah, it's spinning. You It's also spinning. Thank you, you're pointing it out. Yep.
Spin it. And that's why they say polarization. So, when you say polarization, that's how I imagine, you know, you twist the polarization, twist the spin of the of the beam itself. Hm, interesting. And then look at this right down here. Polarization modulated SU2 EM fields for inertial electrostatic confinement fusion systems. I don't even think AI can even find this.
I think if you ask AI this unprompted, it just it won't even find this paper. We explored the possibility of using a gravity beam to lower the electrical input energy needs of fusion in a certain inertial electrostatic nuclear fusion system. One IEC fusion system uses a central negatively charged electrode that draws many converging streams of positively charged ions for plasma located around for a reaction chamber, okay? I mean, this has got to be what they're doing. Each radial ion stream emitted uh contains all the fusion fuel. Wait.
Each radial ion stream is emitted from a plasma generator that contains the fusion fuel. Huh. So, when they inject when they for the fusion fuel they inject it as a plasma itself. Hm. Interesting. Okay.
Uh and then the discharge uh and radio frequency discharge to transform fusion fuels into plasma and transform plasma into a focused ion beam. And then what are you going to do with that beam? You know what? I'm going to go ahead and guess. They're going to take that beam and they're going to do this bad boy to it right here. They're going to pull it They're going to take the beam from fusion and they're going to polarize this bad boy.
Baird's transforming of normal electromagnetic waves into SU2 waves is extended to electromagnetic plasma waves emitted from plasma injectors. Let's go, baby. Plasma generating waves. Oh, forget your lasers. We're doing it with plasma. Holy [ __ ] Ion pumpy thing.
Rest in peace, General McCaslin. General McCaslin, if you can hear me your sacrifice will not be in vain. I don't care what they say. That's you. TMB spaceship says you is got to be you. How can it not be General Mccaslin?
Come on, man. Are you kidding me? Are you kidding me? Wow. Why needs and antenna elements of each injector would be modified to modulate both the phase and polarization of the created SU2 beam and favorably affect electrons and ions inside of it.
If the SU2 field contains uh content causes some electron ion attractions, Coulomb resistance is applied to the EM input oh, to the EM input power will lessen. So, if less energy input is needed to be expended by the attracting ion SU2 fields bringing the ions closer together for work uh enough for SU2 weak force matter fields in the nuclei themselves to cause their fusion. I think what they're saying is they would set it up in a way where it responds to the the less energy input required. We are now exploring possibilities of adding an Oh, [ __ ] Oh, [ __ ] chat.
Oh, no, no, no, no. I see it, chat. Zoom in, chat. Zoom in, chat. 10,000% zoom, chat. Do you see it, chat? Did you see it?
Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle, wiggle, wiggle. Oh, chat, what is it about to say? What are they going to do with that beam, chat? What are they going to do with your ion beam? It's the wiggler. Oh, can you say undulator?
Chat, the magic word of the day is undulate Actually, you know what it's wiggle. It's wiggle. Oh, We're going to undulate that [ __ ] We're going to undulate your fusion beam. Oh, you made a fusion beam? Would be a shame if we turned it into a gravity beam. Dr. Evil, let's do it. Okay, what does it say though?
We are now exploring the possibilities. Okay, I zoomed in a a little too much, guys. For adding another set of helical windings to the existing set. Such a circuit would wiggle RF discharges somewhat like an undulator, a wiggler in a free electron laser. How it accelerates and decelerates electrons. Electron accelerations and decelerations in a free electron laser can give off enormously complex and varied bursts of EM radiation.
And an FEL undulator is played like a very highly tuned musical instrument. That's what it is. The reason why it doesn't work is you can't just bash on it. You got to play it like an instrument. You got to play it like purpose. You got to make music, baby.
If you want to make Oh, this is a great clip. If you want to make gravity, you got to make music, baby. Mhm. Okay. Therefore, a critical issue in helicon windings, told you has to be a helix. Told you it was a helix, chat.
I [ __ ] told you it was a helix. I didn't even read this, by the way. I didn't read this before today. Heart. Cross my heart, hope to die. I didn't even I read like this upper part, kind of.
I didn't even read this part. I should have. Obviously. What does it say here? Now I need to read all the rest of this. Um okay, we need to make helix to provide control precision that may have to approach that of very large and complex free electron lasers.
So, the secret is actually figuring out how to control the plasma to make it turn into a gravity beam just like you want. After you're doing the fusions actually relatively easy, it sounds like. But then making the gravity beam requires essentially turning it into a musical instrument and making your electron beam, your ion beam turn into a gravity beam by undulating and getting it to sync up and playing it to to have it sw- swirl around exactly like you want. Damn, Chad. This is crazy. By the way, this this is the exact science.
I've never seen anything that explained the orbs so clearly. Uh that goes as far back as however this far it is. I don't know. This obviously has to be decades old, at least a decade old. One current unknown interaction of the gravity beams from plasma generators with the normal electromagnetic beam of the negatively charged grid. The grid's negatively charged direct current electric field is not expected to interact with the gravity beam.
Thus, the grid should properly repel ions inside the beam while not interfering with the gravity beam. One possibility might be to eventually remove the grid entirely and let the mutual attraction of the merging nuclear fusion ions from many converging SU2 ion beams coalesce themselves naturally into a central region of increasing ion compactification. Hopefully this would create a deep potential well of attracting fusion ions. A potential well that would finally enable fusion of of fuel of ions by the SU2 matter fields in the fuel ions themselves. You guys feel it, right? Holy [ __ ] We're in the end game now, chat.
It's saying we're going to build this fusion reactor. We're going to have these grids and the grids are going to allow all the ions to come and build up in the middle where the fusion's going to happen right in the middle. So we've got all this metal grid going on and it's saying, well, what if we just get rid of the grid? There is no spoon, chat. What if we can get rid of the grid because we can build up the uh the uh the ions and the electrons in such a way where it creates a natural grid? Where the fusion reaction itself is self-stabilizing.
The little sun that's going on, essentially we find the the the the uh equal point where this little sun just stays stable. The natural magnetic fields the sun creates in the fusion causes it to create this bubble and then pull in more energy for the fusion process to continue. That's what they're at least speculating at that here. They're essentially speculating at a self-stable power of the sun in the palm of my hands. That's what they're speculating on for sure right here. They're like, if this is true and it takes less and less energy, the way they should think about it like this.
They're saying, if it's true we can use a gravity beam to reduce the Coulomb barrier, then there should be a stabilization point where this fusion's happening all on its own and it's feeding itself. And you don't even have to do anything else. As long as you keep it just like that, it's feeding itself.