The GASER - Gravity Wave Amplifier Microchip

Video Transcript

Carl Sean could not have predicted 2021, but he did see it coming. He wrote the following back in 1995, and we quote, "I have a foreboating of an America in my children's or grandchildren's time. When the United States is a service and information economy. When nearly all the manufacturing industries have slipped away to other countries. When awesome technological powers are in the hands of a very few [music] and no one representing the public interest can even grasp the issues. When the people have lost the ability to set their own agendas or knowledgeably [music] question those in authority. When clutching our crystals and nervously consulting our horoscopes, our [music] critical faculties in decline. Unable to distinguish between what feels good and what's true, [music] we slide almost without noticing back into superstition and darkness. The dumbing down of America is most evident in the slow decay of substantive content in the enormously [music] influential media. The 30-second sound bites now down to 10 seconds or less. lowest [music] common denominator programming, credulous presentations on pseudocience [music] and superstition, but especially a kind of celebration of ignorance. Roll that around for a while. Those [music] were among his final published words. He died 10 months later. [music] Here we are 25 years later realizing just what he was trying to tell us back then. >> Ashton Forbes, you know that super jacked guy. Malaysian 370 contact switch 120 decimal 97. >> Breaking news tonight. A Malaysia Airlines [music] flight with 239 people on board, including four Americans, [music] has gone missing >> even as these grainy satellite images released today by the Chinese government. >> Again, the Malaysian flight [music] was a was one shot at China saying knock it up. >> Why shoot it down though if it's not hostile? Our technologies [music] permit us to manipulate time and space. >> Why is it distance [music] annihilated? >> This country is very powerful. >> Far more powerful than people understand. We [music] have weaponry that nobody has any idea what it is. And it is the most powerful weapons [music] in the world. Not even close. I remember [music] from Hindu scripture [music] [music] he's trying to persuade the prince that he should do and to impress him takes on his multi-armed form [music] and says now I am become death to destroy of worlds. [music] I suppose we all thought that one way or another. >> Oh, it's physics time, chat. It is physics time, guys. People are criticizing that I talk to you all like this. You know what I have to say to the haters? Too bad, chat. I love talking like this. Number one, it amuses me and that's the only thing that matters. [snorts] By the way, guys, how's my shirt look today? I hope you guys are having a great night. You know what? I'm just I'm not feeling it. This is for you, Eddie. [clears throat] Here you go, ladies. My only fans has begun officially right now. Would you look at that chat? Oh man. Stolen valor. Stolen valor. They say, you know what? I dare you. I dare you to call me out on stolen valor. I know a guy. I know a guy very important in the VPU, too. He's kind of big deal. Uh, he's giving me the pass as it turns out. The drip is on point. Check. Uh, chat. Okay, we are now we are ready for some science. First things first, we have some things that we need to discuss. Lindsy Graham has passed away. poisoned by our enemies. Chat, we already figured out who the cause was. It was obvious from the beginning. Putin did this. Putin's responsible, obviously. I mean, we don't have to investigate or get any facts. We know that Vladimir Putin did this. Uh Putin hates America. He hates our freedoms. Lindsey Graham loved our freedoms and loved destroying everybody that doesn't love our freedoms. So, rest in peace to the war goat. Let [snorts] him be remembered fondly and we will get vengeance on our enemies for taking him out. [clears throat] Let's get serious though. Actually, no. One more thing. Two more things. [snorts] General McCasslin. Oh yeah. Also, the Jurassic Park guy died, chat. Sam Neil, the goat. They're just dying left and right. We're getting older. Time is moving on. We're getting older. We still don't have zero point energy. We still don't have we don't even have basic fusion, let alone a neutronic fusion, which they've already been hiding. They've already got teleportation. We're not even close to it. So, we need these live streams to catch up to them to steal back the knowledge which they've been accelerating in the shadows away from us. That's the reason why tonight I want to highlight a few members of the community either tangentally directly. Turns out at least one is directly a member of our community. [sighs] Uh but before we get to that, General McCasslin is still missing for over a 100 days. Oh, or blurry. Okay, one second. Still blurry. chat. I gotta work on that. Okay. My whole thing was blurry with the shirt. You are kidding me, chat. The whole shirt thing was blurry. Rest in peace, my stream. We're starting over. Just kidding. Okay. General McCasslin missing for over a hundred days. The only one fighting for the truth is ZPE disclosure. That's the only person I see out there fighting for the truth about General McCassland. Do we really believe that the feds have no idea where General McCassland is? Of course they know. Of course they know. Why are they not telling us? This is an actual conspiracy that the conspirators should be looking into. And every day that goes by is a travesty because he is still gone and no one knows. Especially his wife. He's with the tall whites. Indeed. Proves this is a live stream. Some people don't believe. One more thing. Now, I found out right before this live stream that one of the people we were about to talk about is a member of this community. And actually, this is nothing could give me higher praise than finding out that the people that are presenting on APE are actually members of this community that follow along, that enjoy the content, that in some cases even look up to me out of all people. So, I hope he doesn't mind, but I got a ping from Gabriel Diaz right before this on Twitter, and I was already ready, prepared to show off some of his clips because I thought he did a really good job on Apek. And then I find out, oh, he was like looking up to me and looking for my approval. And I just thought, wow, wow, we have really made it in the influential the ZPE community uh by pushing more and more people towards this content, inspiring them to investigate and do their own science and their own theories based on it. That actually has that was my goal from the very beginning. And now we're watching it play out. It's like it's like watching your kid go off to college. I couldn't be I couldn't be happier. So, I just want to let you guys know that. Now, before we get into this, and this is related to uh Gabriel's presentation is boundary condition changes. This is the felony physics comment topic of tonight. Boundary condition changes. The Casemir effect. [snorts] What I try to teach people is that the kasmir effect is itself not the mechanism by which we're going to make a warp drive. Two metal plates that are coming together is never going to create a warp drive for us. But we can learn something about physics from that effect. And what we learn from physics is that space is not empty. Space is not an empty vacuum. The thing that Sabine Hosenfelder needs to get through her her thick skull at the moment. She's a hard one to crack. It turns out and if space is not empty that means that in theory what's really happening is that space is pushing on us all the time from every direction on every atom. This means that like imagine a balloon. Imagine I have a balloon and I push on that balloon. What happens if I let go? Whoa. It shoots back out. That's negative energy. Does that make sense? What we're trying to accomplish from a warp drive, wormhole, even em drive, we're pushing back on the medium, but not quite. We're pushing on that medium and we're letting it slingshot us back, but we're doing that. And when we're doing that, we're breaking the light barrier. much analogist to breaking the sound barrier in air. That's why the equations look so similar. So the felony physics topic tonight the boundary conditions what we learn from the casemir effect is that these plates if we move them relativistically light gets trapped bounces off the mirrors bounces off of them gets trapped and then boom pops into existence. It's a real effect. You came for physics and here it is first paper of the night. Probably the only paper to be honest but it's an important one. Observation of the dynamic casmir effect in a superconducting circuit. This is not theoretical. This is very important. This is experimentally proven. One of the most surprising predictions of modern quantum theory. All of this comes from quantum field theory is that the vacuum of space is not empty. That's the most that's the very first sentence in this paper. This is 2011 by the way. In fact, quantum theory predicts that it teams with virtual particles fit fitting flitting in and out of existence. This is the zero point energy. This is the zero point energy. Although initially a curiosity, it was quickly realized that these vacuum fluctuations had measurable consequences. For instance, producing the lamb shift of the electron. This type of renormalization due to vacuum fluctuations is now central to our understanding of nature. However, these effects provide indirect evidence for the existence of vacuum fluctuations. From early on, it was discussed whether or not it may be possible to more directly observe these virtual particles. 40 years ago, it was suggested a mirror undergoing relativistic motion could convert virtual photons into directly observable photons. This phenomenon later termed the dynamic kasmir effect had not been previously demonstrated. This is the first time this effect was experimentally demonstrated. Here we observe the dynamic kasmir effect in a superconducting circuit consisting of a co-planer transmission line within a tunable electric length. The rate of change of the electrical length can be made very fast. So they've made an equivalent analog of the mirrors moving back and forth. In addition to the observation or observing creation of real photons, they also detect a two mode squeezing in the emitted radiation which is a signature of the quantum character of the generation process. Go ahead Sabine. Go ahead and debunk the dynamic Casemir effect. So the key element is taking the same kasmir effect and now applying a time varying condition. You may say Ashton what the hell does that mean? Good question. Very good question. [snorts] Well the answer is this or this. I suppose you have your your mirror is moving or this spinning. It means that from your perspective, let's say you're on an airplane and there's some orbs spinning around you and they're spinning around your plane vertically. You're watching the orbs spin around and from your perspective it looks like they're spinning around in a circle around you. That's a time varying condition. That orb moves from that place to that place to that place and it's all perfectly geometric around you. This is the secret to probably nuclear weapons as well. I don't know that for a fact so the government can't come after me. I'm only speculating but uh time varying boundary condition and it has been proven that when they push this to relativistic speeds very high rates of speed that light comes out of nowhere. This is also the most logical explanation for sonoluminescence. I went hard at people at this. Why? [music] Because where is the light coming from in this effect right here? I mean, where is the light actually coming from? This is just sound waves in water. Sound waves in water causing a cavitation bubble. And everybody agrees that it's the cavitation bubble which causes the light to come out. But what does that mean? You just blew a bubble in there with some sound waves and then it collapsed so quickly. It collapsed so quickly that it produced light. I mean just from a classic physics perspective, that doesn't make any sense to me. It feels like the cavitation shouldn't be able to collapse so quickly that light appears out of nowhere under a classic physics perspective. And it turns out I think that's true. Now, where did I go to find this most recent information practical conversion of 0 energy? Thomas Voluone, PhD, by the way. He did get his PhD. He knows his [ __ ] And he was a patent examiner, too. And right here on page 21, it says ZPE and sonoluminescence. So, let's listen to the actual arguments, the facts, the details, the scientific papers. Those science people be [ __ ] sometimes. It's factual. Scientists at UCLA have recently measured the length of time that sonol luminescence flashes persist. How long that flash persists very quick. Barber discovered that they only exist for 50 picos seconds or shorter which is too brief for the light to be produced by some atomic process. So it can't be some atomic nuclear process at place there. Atomic processes in comparison emit light for at least several ten of a second. So the light should have been flat should have persisted for longer to and this is a direct quote to the best of our resolution which has only established upper bounds the light flashes less than 50 picos seconds in duration occurs within 0.5 nconds of the minimum bubble radius. The sonoluminescence flash width is thus 100 times shorter than the shortest visible lifetime of an excited state of a hydrogen atom. Wow. Wow. Chat. The other thing I want to point out here is [clears throat] Julian Schwinger as in the guy that won the Nobel Prize for quantum electronamics for developing quantum electronamics with Richard Fineman in 1965. that Julian Schwinger Schwinger proposed a physical mechanism for sonoluminescence in terms of photon production due to changes in the property of the vacuum arising from a collapsing dialectric bubble. Well, well, well, chat. Well, well, well. [clears throat] Julian Schwinger believed that it was a a phenomenon related to the vacuum as well as cold fusion. Turns out all of our goats were on our side and still on our side spiritually. Let's get to the content because we got more to go through here tonight. First off, [clears throat] now that we understand that boundary conditions are important, let's take one more look at the MH370 videos. Now that we've learned a little bit, we're a little smarter now than the average bear when it comes to physics. Now, when we look at this, we don't see video games or um what is it? pictures of clouds or Jesus Christ, this one rules out the pictures of clouds and the other one rules out the video game effects. Um, but anyway, now that we look at these orbs spinning around the plane, at first we can tell they got to be locking in. They're trying to figure out where do they have to go to get into the right position to mess around with the boundary conditions. And they've already gotten to the correct radius uh from the plane. And now here we can't see because it happens while it's off screen, but the orbs have locked in vertically. Now they've locked in vertically. And this is the part where I'm saying if you're on the airplane, the position of the orb is changing, creating the time varying boundary condition. This is basically twisting, manipulating space time. And this is going to be important from both of the clips and presentations that we're going to be watching here today. Now I use this as an example because this is the best possible example. And these plasma orbs are acting as mirrors, moving mirrors. You would say, Ashton, how is that possible? And at first I was surprised as well. But it turns out with just three objects like this, you don't need to have a perfectly flat mirror. In fact, because you want a time varying condition, you actually want it to be like just a orb like this or let's say a nel as Sunny White would put it. So, we have our time varying plasma orb condition and then watch what happens at the end. Did you see that they converged? Let's slow it down. So I think we're still accurate in terms of these are little fusion reactors, but they're using them in the high beta condition to create these time varying space-time condition. And look, they pulled in. They pulled in. They pulled in just like the dynamic kasmir effect. They had set the cylinder. The cylinder they had created from spinning around the plane. going to create an invisible cylinder and then at the last moment they pull the boundary conditions in and then what do we see happen? We see an implosion. We see an implosion occur here. Watch this. It expands out and then it sucks back in. Well, well, well, well, well. Dynamic Casemir effect. But what the thing that gives me pause, I want to present both sides of this. Even though they pull in really quickly, like we can barely see it. We can barely see it when it they pull in in full speed, I still think, damn, that's all that's they only have to pull in that fast and they can warp spaceime. In my mind, I would have thought, oh, it needs to be like moving super fast, like to the point where the camera can't even catch it, but the camera caught it in like three frames, four frames. That's the only thing that gives me pause. But I have a feeling I'm going to be totally wrong about that. And that's not a big deal at all. But that's what's crazy because it it reminds me of what Salvador P said. This physics is easy. It's not hard. It's easy. And that's what makes it scary. That's what makes it dangerous because when people figure it out, it's going to be impossible to stop people from making super powerful weapons because they don't need like things moving at the speed of light in order to warp spaceime. They just have to figure out the geometry and the resonance and then boom. Interesting. Okay. Hopefully our is our video better by the way. I didn't check. Didn't care. Didn't check. Didn't care. Okay. Let's start with number one. We're going to go to your boy Gabriel. [snorts] Uh I'm going to do these in backwards order, I think. Uh no, no, no, we're not. Where's Here it I think I have it like ready to go. Yeah, [snorts] we're not going to play his whole presentation. These guys we're just going to spotlight, but Gab Gabriel's presentation is essentially about using the polarizable vacuum and using these changing boundary conditions to do work generically. I think I he probably has ideas on how to do it to produce energy and and propulsion. But that goes straight back to what David Cronin said is that if you understand how this works now, we're talking about a whole new avenue of physics new ways of for performing uh producing energy fusion. ZPE is assisted fusion or directly pulling energy from the zero point energy or you know doing like what we did with uh what the one guy was doing with water Stanley Meyer which is splitting splitting molecules at cheaper energy costs than what we currently think is possible. So, it opens up these all new avenues. Here we go. Shout out to Alternate Propulsion Conference 7-Eleven, guys. Check them out. Alt Propulsion. They could use a lot more followers and more people uh checking their stuff out. So, check their stuff out here. um boundary condition vacuum interaction systems. Oh, he's working with Douglas Miller, too. So, shout out to Douglas Miller. Uh another uh you know, supporter of zero point energy. We need all the ones we can get. First thing that I thought was amazing. This is a great way to start. Where do you start with this? If you're explain number one, you explain spaceime is not empty. Best way to explain this is ground state of the hydrogen atom. Thank you by the way Mark. I see you. I see you Mark for following for three years. Appreciate you. Ground state of the hydrogen atom. Why? Because that shows us that every atom every single atom not just the atoms in me or the atoms in my phone. Every single atom is interacting with the zero point energy. That's a hugely profound thing to understand. So here you go. Here's our boy. Give him some support explaining it. Uh meaning just how we measure what we're talking about and how we determine what our device is actually doing. And the fl the framework is Douglas's and the discrimination work near the end is mine. and discrimination being uh just the job of telling competing explanations apart. Um start with some theory first um before I show you the device or just a general ide first first impressions chat. [clears throat] By the way, no bias. This is no bias. I love the graphics. You see his little spinny ball, his little spinny atom going on on the right over there. chat. One of the first things I learned in entrepreneurship class, you get one grade improvement just by adding color, just by adding some graphics. You say, "Ashen, that's silly." I say, "You have vastly underestimate the intelligence of humans if you don't realize that what I'm saying is absolutely true. It's not even a joke." Not even a joke. Great, great graphics. Keep them coming of it. uh since I can't actually disclose the real design and materials we're using. Uh and I'll start from a simple question some of you are familiar with which is why doesn't the electron collapse into the nucleus of the atom or where is the electron getting the energy to keep moving around jittering indefinitely or the stability of the atom problem. Well, according to classical physics, the electron should collapse right here. An orbiting electron is an accelerating charge and that charge radiates energy away over time till the orbit decays and the electron spirals into the nucleus in about 10 trillion of a second. So classically speaking uh atoms shouldn't exist unless something is feeding energy back in quantum mechanics uh stability is built into the theory. So he he presented it very quickly. So let me just let it sink in. Under a classical view whether or not you think it's a cloud of electrons or however you perceive the electron that movement is energy. If you believe in thermodynamics, then either the elect then either the atoms are perpetual motion machines which violates thermodynamics or the atoms must be radiating energy due to the fact there's movement happening due to the fact they exist. So how are they saying stable? Why are they stable? Why don't they collapse upon themselves? In fact, they should be collapsing upon themselves in less than a second. That's how fast it should be happening. Think about that. So, I'm sure you'll hear Quantum Sabine or the other physicists who've been counter signaling us hard and they need to try harder. They need to be trying harder, chat. They're not doing a good enough job right now. They're going to say, "Well, it's uh it's totally explainable." They're going to say, "This is totally understood by classical physics, and it's uh it's not a mystery at all." And you'll be like, "Okay, we're waiting for the answer." And they'll be like, "It's it's explained." You'll be like, "So, are you going to explain it or are you just going to say that it's explained?" Well, they'll say that the the Maxwellian uh um Landau uh corporations uh totally have uh figured that out. They always just name drop some [ __ ] instead of just, hey, can you just explain it in like a normal way that a normal person can understand because I'm looking at something here that doesn't make any sense whatsoever, just written out on paper and you're telling me I don't have to worry about that. What if that misunderstanding is a foundational understanding, misunderstanding of the universe, of physics itself? Doesn't take a a rocket scientist to figure out that this means there's an ether of energy all around us. Please continue sir >> through Heisenberg's uncertainty principle um confine right uh the electron more tightly and its momentum spread grows costing energy um so there is a lowest possible state the ground state and the theory guarantees a stationary and it works just fine no problem for my dum dums for my dum dums out there just look at the graphic you see the graphic you see how it spins inward and then it crashes there you That's the problem. You don't need to understand any of the words. That's it. That's the problem. Now, how do you solve that? How do you make sure your thing doesn't crash inward? Pew. We inject more energy. There's something there. The same reason why when we look at the galaxies. How come they spin faster along the edges than we would predict? Oh. Oh, look at this. Is it the same as this little guy over here? Interesting. problem with that. Um although it could be a little counterintuitive sometimes and but well in stoastic electronamics sed there is a third answer and that is balance. Uh in stoastic electronamics there's a real classical field in the background that's present everywhere all the time and that field gives us uh gives the atoms their stability. uh the electron does radiate energy exactly as classical physics says but it also absorbs energy continuously from this background field and then the pure rates cancel right here. Uh so Dr. How put off in 1987 computed that balance for the ground state of the hydrogen atom is even so average power emitted equals average power absorbed. So the third answer gives us a real >> So right there the ground state you automatically get a gold star if you come into your zero point energy presentation you start with a ground state hydrogen atom which is of course where you start 1987 it's where you start then you realize how putoff yes of course the electrons radiating energy it must be I believe in thermodynamics chat how pudof says I believe in science Quantum Sabine Hassenfelder doesn't believe in science. Chad, she believes that atoms are perpetual motion machines violating the laws of physics. I believe in science. I believe that the electron must be it must be atom must be radiating energy and it must be also absorbing the same amount of energy. It must be absorbing the exact same amount of energy and therefore being in a balance all the time. Oh wow. That's almost like being your rubber ducky in the bathtub, sitting in the bathtub, just chilling on the top of the ocean, on the top of the water field everywhere all the time. And you just can't feel this field for the same reason you just can't feel the atmospheric pressure pushing your body at every moment because it just pushes from every direction. It pushes the same from every side. And that's great to point out because seriously, we're dealing with very dumb people out here. They're saying, "Why don't we feel this then?" Because we're in an equilibrium. We imagine there's nothing pushing on us. That we're just sitting here, there's nothing pushing on us, and therefore there's no negative energy to be gained. But if something's pushing on every atom of our body all the time, and we relieve that pressure, just like the balloon, pay attention, we imagine that the balloon, there's nothing pushing back on the balloon. That's classic physics. Add in 0 point energy, we realize every atom is like the balloon, but there's something pushing that balloon, keeping it compressed. And if we remove that zero point energy that keeps it compressed, suddenly it will just accelerate. The negative energy will pull it apart. This also explains why if you do one of these effects to let's say the water molecule, you cause it the atoms to just split apart. Um, but what is this field exactly? >> Okay, so um, okay, I'm going to let this play. >> Well, that is the zero point field, a real random electromagnetic field that spreads it everywhere all the time. It's also stochastic, meaning is it has random phases, so it averages to zero, but it never really stops fluctuating the pendulum. >> Okay, so we know the zero point energy field. I'm going to skip past this part. We're going to come back to this in a second because here's the other clip that I want to play also of Gabriel explaining the polarizable vacuum because now we say we've got this zero point energy pushing on us all the time. But what about how do we counteract that push? I mean, if you've been following me, you kind of already may know, but here's a hint. Hal Pudof. Always Hal Pudof and his friends. >> Pudof and also Barry Sedfield. >> According to Pudof every time, guys, this is for Congressman Berles and all the other people that are being played by Hal Pudof. These guys are very smart. They're smart enough to make lasers. They're smart enough to make gravity wave beams. They're smart enough to make plasma orbs and fusion. And they're smart enough to manipulate spaceime. They're definitely smart enough to trick you into thinking that you're the first person to figure it out. They're definitely smart smart enough to trick you into thinking you should go try to find out about the aliens. Don't worry about our teleportation technology. And I don't think there's another Hal Pudof Yoda of the zero point energy like hidden in the black world that nobody knows. It's possible, but it seems extremely unlikely. What you find about these guys is they want to be known. They want people to know what they did, but in some cases they have NDAs and therefore they can't talk about it, but they did some crazy stuff. So, here we go. Sorry to interrupt. Gabriel, please enlighten the noobs. Enlighten the noobs on the polarizable vacuum. Sir, >> according to Putoff and also Barry Sedterfield, physicist from Australia, uh the properties of the vacuum can be modified or polarized. And here's the picture. Um when zero point waves interfere, they form charge pairs, an electron and a positron, positive and negative together. In quantum field theory, these are called virtual particle pairs. In the stoastic electronamics reading, they're real pairs popping in and out of existence, producing real observable effects. They live for a very short time and then annihilate each other. Particle and antiparticle cancelling back into the field so the vacuum stays neutral the whole time. No, that that right there. Holy smokes. Nailed it. What did we just say about the dynamic cosmir effect? He says, "Oh, classical physics says, hey, they're these virtual particle pairs that are popping into existence. Ignore them. They don't matter. They're just there." I mean, quantum mechanics says they're there, but we're not going to worry about it. Turns out those are supplying 97% of the energy of the atom. Those virtual particles are supplying 97. So, would you say they're real? Uh, sounds pretty damn real to me. If they supply 97% of the atom energy of your atoms, that's the most real thing there is. Maybe the only real thing there is. So, stochastic electronamics, Barry Setterfield, they're saying they say that these virtual particles are not virtual at all. They're real. And now we can interact with these real particles that are popping into existence, polarize them. Polarizing them is essentially electrifying them, making it so that they all line up the same way electrically. And if we do this, interact with them in some meaningful way, we can change reality. Let's listen. How do these pairs set the vacuum's properties? If you apply an electric field [clears throat] before each pair annihilates it gets slightly stretched like you can see here like a dialectric material that responsiveness is epsilon KN right here uh the electric constant and the pairs response to magnetic fields likewise is mu not the magnetic constant and light is exactly the stuff that travels through this medium an electric field creates a magnetic field which creates an electric field and so on. >> Does that remind you? And yes, plank ether hypothesis. There's many hypothesis that are basically exactly the same as this. Which is why fighting over the credit is going to be a meaningless endeavor. If you want to do something related to physics, the best thing you can do is get ahead of what's going to happen and start investing in and or building the technology before other people and trying not to get killed. That's just what I'm going to say. Uh yeah sorry um >> Maxwell's equations uh so magnetic field which creates an electric field and so on. >> Oh yeah and so remember Dr. U Dr. You said that the light is the pertabbation in the medium and this is essentially what he's saying if we have this medium then then maybe light is just a fluctuation in this medium and that's why we are seeing when we look at the electromagnetic wave why it's perpendicular why electric field seems to produce a magnetic field magnetic field seems to produce an electric field and why they're orthogonal 90 degrees to one another. This is where Jenny Nielsen is going to take over in a second because the next question, the question of the a vector potential says, what if we add one more orthogonal angle? What if we take the pointing vector, the additional orthogonal angle, and we turn that into something? Maxwell's equations. Uh so the medium's true constant set the speed of light uh from this equation right here. C² = 1 [clears throat] over epsilon KN* M. So what's [clears throat] really happening here as he's pointing out is that the medium has the speed of light is equal to C as we know it. The speed of light C is actually just a byproduct of this 0.8 energy has has permeated everywhere. It's in a balance. It's in a balance and we don't notice because it's pretty much always in a balance all around us. And this is what's giving us all the physical properties including the speed of light. So if we were somehow able to manipulate this this balance of zero point energy particles, then this would change the speed of light. This would change the physical properties as we see them. This is what accounts for your UFO stories, for your alien stories, for your UFO technology. It's just using quantum mechanics mixed with general relativity, aka our real reality. Now look at those equations. C^2 equ= 1 / mu epsilon right epsilon whatever permitivity times permeability the magnetic permeability times the electric perivity. So what he's saying is it's a medium. It's a dialectric medium. Spacetime itself is a medium just like uh an some kind of metal, some kind of a metal that conducts electricity. We just don't realize it. This is where Jack Sarati doesn't see the full picture. He thinks of spaceime as an empty vacuum. Therefore, he thinks you need a material, a meta material to produce these effects. Now, take that same process and apply it to spaceime. And you realize, oh, I want plasma to be my trigger, and I'm going to use it and apply it on spaceime to change the permitiv permitivity, permeability, change the physical properties of spaceime. That's what they're doing with the plane. Okay, let me let this finish. >> And so put off developed the polarizable vacuum picture. Uh the vacuum as a medium whose electric and magnetics properties can in principle vary along with the stability balance we saw the hydrogen atom. Setterfield extended it claiming that the density of those charge pairs is what sets epsilon kn and mu not. So if you change the pair density in that picture you change the vacuums constants locally. If you change the pair density, you change the vacuum's constants locally. Well, how do we change the pair density? According to David Froin and Terrence Barrett, we create an SU2 conditioned field. They were making tooidal toidal rings that had a teardrop shape in them, a kink in them. And in theory, this manipulating the amount of the zero point energy. It's probably exactly producing an a vector potential. Producing an a vector potential in spaceime itself. So this is where Jenny Nielsen, Jenny Lorraine Nielsen comes into play. And from my understanding of her work, I probably should invite these people on to let them speak for themselves. Okay, whatever, chat. I get it. Don't add at me. I didn't realize that everyone was gonna be a follower or what have you or be DMing and things like that, but I would just be commenting. She says that her theory is very similar to the ideas of David Froin's SU2 conditioning as well as uh Ferris Williams thought process about spin. Spin being the grand unifier. Spin being the extra orthogonal dimension that we have not caught on to. And she visualizes the entire concept of the unification theory as a giant hop fibration. Giant hop fibration. Does she have an image of it? Hold on. Is this it? Somewhere there is a image of it. So, here is Jenny Nielsen and her presentation on the same exact channel was actually right after Gabriel. Topological space-time torsion. Everybody's using these AI images. I can't I can't deny it. I am too. Topological unified field theory and macroscopic warp geometry. Very very similar to what we've been discussing. Now, my criticism, if I have them, you know what? I'm I'm going to be harsh just cuz she's a girl. She's not getting I'm not going easy on her. Number one criticism, it's not really a criticism. It's just that I think her I like her framework as understanding how things relate to one another. I'm not necessarily sure that the universe is a giant hop fibration or whatever, but it's a good visualization for understanding the concepts. Maybe that's her her point. I'm not entirely sure. A really good one, actually. I like it. Um, and so she presents the SU U1 versus SU2 condition fields as like the strings in the in this shape in this bubble formation where the lines never cross. Now let's go to [sighs] the part I want to listen to. I think is somewhere around here. Oh, and my criticism, my criticism would only be if you look at Gabriel's presentation, just focus on the main points, like focus on the most strong aspect coming in, the foundational aspect to it, and then build your way up to it. And don't focus on yourself. You know, it's not really about you. You might be the smartest person in the world, but it is whatever. You're almost never going to hear me join an interview or do a presentation where I'm like, "Well, I'm the smartest dude and here's what I figured out and here's what I'm just going to get right on into it." Let the content speak for itself. Have the spirit and the fight of Kobe Bryant. Kobe Bryant won a national championship. Rest in peace, by the way, Kobe, don't don't fly helicopters. Never. Kobe Bryant won a national championship and the next day he was working out getting ready for next year. Think about that. wasn't even celebrating, not patting himself on the back, getting back into the gym and hitting the weights. That's all. Not meant to be a harsh criticism. Okay. Now, there she makes some really good points in this presentation, and I think they're right about here. So, I'm just going to play this out and see where we're at here. >> Of as field lines. >> Yeah, hold on. Right about here. >> Potential lines are around in circles. It's sort of the same dealio with the uh hot vibration. The hot vibration the uh lines that extend from it you can think of as field lines the and then the the circular parallel circles you can think of as belti potential modes. So it's the potential is perpendicular to the field mode just like uh with a regular field line just like with regular ENM. Anyway, so electromagnetism is the UN fiber and gravity is sourced from torsion of the object which is just the belti potential. That's the torsion. It spins around and it kind of it has a slight twist and the twist actually drags it um in a specific direction which imparts kirality or helicity. It imparts spin. It imparts all the beautiful things we used to get from the direct. Uh but >> so she's taken the direct direct theory and she's kind of morphed it and said that we have this idea of spin and spin is applying this concept that you may have heard of right-handed versus left-handed kirality. It's like why does this particle spin one direction or the other or why is it the uh flipped upside down versus not flipped upside down. It says oh this must be some property of the universe itself. And my guess would be is that we've probably seen this like when we look at the uh I forget the Russian name where this like if you drop a tennis racket the tennis racket spins and then flips. You're like huh why does it do that? Why does it just keep spinning? I was like is there some kink twist in spaceime that causes these kinds of effects? That's what I believe uh Jenny is explaining here or her theory explains among other things. bundle. So in traditional physics, we have the gauge bundle and then we talk about particles as if they're excitations of that gauge bundle, but then we don't treat them that way. We glue on this thing called the direct bundle, which was sort of a toy model that Direct was playing with that imparted helicity spin the things that we wanted, the things that we needed. And so he took that. Now that thing is a uh just a regular uh uh you know there's two kinds of of uh multiplication. There's this the regular vector multiplication and then there's uh the cross productduct. The belt is the cross productduct and direct just is the regular product. So um the cross productduct is more accurate. So toft replaces the direct toy model of the particle. And the reason I call it a toy model isn't because direct was like doing something wrong at the time. He was doing the best thing they knew how. Uh but it didn't put particles on the field. And we He showed that means it's on the hot vibration on SU2 like I I was talking about except it's the U1 on SU2. Um and that uh U1 meaning the circular symmetry on the sphere. So anyway, so >> I want to point out this girl is very obviously knowledgeable. Um, okay. Well, you can I was muted. I said something stupid. Anyway, don't worry about it. She's very obviously knowledgeable about everything related to physics. I'm curious how her background and where she comes from on all this. he found that um the electromagnetic field was working like like a hop field which is what I showed but I didn't even I didn't even know about his work but I just found it and so that's more verification that you can map regular electromagnetic fields as this crazy bundle and so it's really just a bundle of field lines and then it's a bundle of potential lines and that's and then the potential lines are have carry torsion although not very much usually so you don't usually >> so it's basically a bunch of field lines and then a bunch of potential lines this should remind you of the Aaronhoff bomb effect where we see that the potentials are actually the things that are causing the real physical effects and this should imply that the potentials are a mechanism to space-time manipulation. >> See it? But if you can kick it up, you can you can find the torsion is basically >> that's a good way to put it. A mental model of it. I really I like her mental model of it. Exactly. how the theory goes. So the topological coupling is physically evidenced by the 1964 Barger experiment. Uh they pulsed water with an acoustic shock source and um they got a spherical shock shells three of them and uh there were 20 uh like modes and basically there was no way to predict that though and and I went through and I couldn't find a way and I tried more ways than Barger did. So anyway, but if you use my way, it p if you if you show the water as coupling to the torsion field on the belt flow, which kind of makes sense because like belami is linked to Navier Stokes, but the traditional Navier Stokes equations don't predict this. So, so what I liked here, go back a second, was that she drops a real experiment and she says this experiment produced these spherical shocks shells into these regimes and this shows this was something that we couldn't explain. Why is this happening? So, I always love when people drop the physics because at the end of the day, physics is all about explaining what we see experimentally, observationally. Now, I don't want to do her any disrespect, but I'm going to cut her short because I want to flip over to my longer thing around uh gravity wave amplification. So, guys, check out Jenny Lorraine Nelson and check out Gabriel. Let me hit up their ats on Twitter at least, guys. Gabriel CLD Diazx. If I spelled their names wrong, let me know. And then Jenny Nelson is Qualia Quanta. So you guys can follow them, check out their stuff, check out their physics. Look at us. We're playing Kingmaker chat. Let's make people famous. Let's do it. We can get more clout for ourselves if we make other people famous. [laughter] No, I'm just kidding. Okay, the main event. Are you ready? I don't know how I didn't see this a month ago. There's even a comment about can't wait to watch this on Ashton's stream. Found another presentation by Gary Stephvenson. Gary Stephvenson on Tim Venturo once again. Guys, where did we rank? Where did we rank Gary Stevenson on the Black Project tier list? Whatever it was, probably too low. Probably too low. Probably needs to be upgraded one more uh rank or two. But now this is the part where on the reverse side, I'm like, you know what? Let's not get Gary Stevenson killed. He's a nice guy. He's like one of my favorite physicists engineers out there right now. Is he into some black project stuff? Un injubitably. Indubitably, chat. There's no way you can do a presentation like this here that he's about to show without being dabbling in a little uh questionably ethical science and physics. But at the same time, oh my goodness, what a resource for knowledge. I could listen to this dude talk all day long, chat. Honestly, he might even get the pass even if he voted for Hillary Clinton. Chat, even if he has TDS. I don't know. I don't know. Maybe he does, maybe he doesn't. Might have to let this one slide. Okay, we're just going to get into this. I'm excited for a lot of people, chat. >> So, what might >> they They watch porn. They watch porn. They watch tentacle porn and and beastiality and other uh degenerate [ __ ] chat. For me, my degenerate [ __ ] is watching Gary Stevenson explain how to produce gravitational waves from photons. Forbidden physics, chat. [ __ ] that they ban. You can only get that on the dark web. You don't get this. You don't get this kind of stuff on the normal web. You get it filtered out, chat. You get all the the sketchy degenerate physics filtered out from you. So, here we go. Get your lube ready, chat. [clears throat] Remember, anywhere, anytime. By the way, why does he have three lightning bolts, chat? What What's going on here? What's Are we serious right now? I feel like they're just trolling me directly. Three lightning bolts. Come on. I'm not trying to go too skitso here, but jeez, man. >> And the follow at Popoff Shop at uh in Austin. So, uh he actually had a bulk device in mind. >> What did you just say there? Fact, but is a new way to get it. >> Yes, it is. And I can't take credit for the original idea. This came from Jersey Fontana who you met during the state conferences that you mentioned. He was also at the working groups for hyper graduated working groups. The one at MITER and the fall line at Poff. >> I'm sorry. Sorry. Um did you just say Pudolf's shop? You said it really fast, Gary. You said it kind of fast, but I think I heard Pudolf's shop in Austin. I did. I did hear it. I'm 100% sure, guys. All roads lead back to Hal Pudof. Okay, just you know what? Put my Pulit surprise put my Pulit surprise in the mail. Let my nephew rip it up on the stream. He'll do it in my honor after they take me out. You know what's going to happen. Pudaf's going to send his goons chat. Um, Georgio Fontana deserves the original work, the original credit for the idea of converting a photon into a graviton using this mechanism. These mechanisms originate with Georgio Fontana. He met with Hal Pudof. He went to the MITER conference and to Hal Pudof's shop in Austin, Texas at uh in Austin. So, uh, he actually had a bulk device in mind. So what I've done here was it would have been very difficult to build a device he he imagined. So what I've done instead is redesigned it so it can be prepared in a thin film matter uh on a silicon wafer as if it was a a transistor array. I can't tell you how excited I am for this. He's like hey he was going to try to do this idea but it didn't work. And so I turned into this thin film and then we also turned it into an array. Why did we turn it into an array? Uh any guesses? Any guesses out there? Oh, because it amplifies the power significantly of it. So basically like we fixed this [ __ ] it was janky. It wasn't working. Now we got better material science. Now we're going to make this [ __ ] a reality. And Gary Stevenson is apparently all in on this because how many presentations have we watched? Like three, four. I mean, Tim Ventura has him on speed dial apparently. My goodness. Okay, continue, good sir. >> Okay, so let me get into some of the foundational aspects of this because HFGWs are kind of a niche topic. It is one of those things that some very serious, very rigorous physicists have explored. I think it really got kicked off by the work of Dr. Robert Forward and then Dr. Robert Baker. Um, he did a tremendous amount on this. Robert Baker wrote one of the dirds. Chat, I'm gonna keep calling you chat. Robert ML Baker, Bob Baker is Gary Stevenson's mentor. Just tell me. Just tell me. Which Jason number are you, dude? Which Jason? Do they give you a number? Are you number like 420 number 67 69? I don't know. I'm just I'm just guessing for decades. So some pivotal figures were involved with this. You have been involved with this for decades and you have done remarkable top tier scientific work in this area as well. >> Yeah. I I give credit to Bob Baker. He was my mentor in this area. >> Yeah. >> Bob Baker was my mentor in this area. I give credit to Bob Baker. [clears throat] I'm gonna regret saying this. Congress should probably talk to this guy. Congress. If you are Congressman Berles and you're trying to figure out where the UFOs are hiding, well, how Pudof told you the authors of the Dirds are the Black Project engineers. So, you want to know who you should go talk to? You probably should go talk to the authors of those scientific papers that are classified or were classified, including this guy's mentor. Now, unfortunately, a lot of them are dead now. So, h wonder who else we could talk to. H I wonder if there's anybody out there explaining how we can [ __ ] turn photons into gravitons. H can't find anybody. Nobody anywhere. >> It is it is I mean there is incredible legacy. It is within relativity theory. It is supported to the best of my knowledge by mainstream physics. Right. >> Uh it is although the the device we'll be discussing today is more supported by quantum mechanics. Uh but the the original work that Bob did was entirely within the realm of general relativity. >> So high frequency gravitational waves again just as kind of a foundational catchup for folks who might not be familiar or it's been a while. Um, these might be comparable to what LIGO is looking for, except that LIGO is looking for low frequency gravitational waves. If I remember correctly, it's looking for stuff >> LIGO sensitivity is uh between 20 Hz and just about 4,000 Hz. They're going all the way up to 4,000 Hz. The signals we're talking about are in the gigahertz microwave range. >> Just immediately destroys the LIGO argument. Very first point, LIGO. We're going to the LIGO. LIIGO. LIGO. Timur, I'll help you out. LIGO. The reason why LIGO isn't seeing the alien warp drives. Because if this is true, if we can make gravitons, then the aliens must have warp drives. Why aren't we seeing them with our LIGO experiment, which is our gravitational wave detector? And the answer is because it's only detecting low frequency gravitational waves from celestial bodies from neutron stars colliding. It's not searching for the right kind of gravitational waves from the high frequency gravitational waves that would be produced by aliens. Aliens chat. When I say aliens, by the way, I use this all-encompassing. Sometimes I'm talking about illegal aliens. Sometimes I'm talking about ET. Sometimes I'm talking about cosmic sentience creatures and plasma creatures. Whatever exists, I don't give a [ __ ] Sometimes I'm talking about jellyfish creatures, too. Anyway, continue. Uh, if you were to look at the RF equivalent spectrum versus what I would call very low frequency RF, if if you're talking RF range, 20 Hz to 4,000 hertz is extremely low frequency. um which is where you know E6 operates for instance in the RF. >> So he just said a bunch of technical [ __ ] chat and I don't even know. I can just tell you he's an expert. I can tell you this is should be in this dude should be in charge of the UFO uh UAP learning group chat. There he is thousand times more qualified than Avi Lo just said some [ __ ] about radars nobody understands and frequencies but basically admit it just said the LIGO is low frequency. That's why we're not seeing the warp drives. The moment we turn the LIGO up and we create a high frequency gravitational wave detector. The sky is going to light up with aliens teleporting around, we're going to be like, "Oh, there's another warp drive over there. Space Force probably already has this. Search searching for all the aliens coming to try to invade us." Turns out doesn't seem like it happens very often. So the reason people should be excited about this is once you get into the gigahertz range, it opens the door for potential communications, potential remote sensing, right? You can do all sorts of things with it and potentially propulsion applications as well. >> Yeah. The thing to keep in mind here is that um strain h strain, which is basically the signal strength, how much you're stretching space time as a as a you know delta x as a function of x is on the order is goes frequency squared. So if you if you change the frequency from one hertz to one gigahertz, that's not nine orders of magnitude better signal strength. That's 18 orders of mag magnitude better signal strength. And then whoa fam. Hello. The strain on spacetime increases as frequency squared. Wait a minute. So, as you increase your frequency, your strain increases exponentially. So, here you go. This is why you're not going to be seeing these effects except for under specific conditions. And exponential effects, those are my favorite ones. Exponential effects are my favorite one. So, there you go. There's Gary Stevenson explaining the very first issue away. >> So if you if you change the frequency from one hertz to one gigahertz, that's not nine orders of magnitude better signal strength. That's 18 orders of mag magnitude. >> 18 orders of magnitude by increasing your signal strength by increasing your frequency. Now you look at Salvatore Py's patents and you go, "Whoa, there's a big crossover here." Salvatore Py was also saying amplification of energy. Look at frequency. Look at the uh exponential growth in electromagnetism or the magnetic field strength from frequency signal strength. And then the gravitational wave power goes to the fourth power. So, you know, you're getting watts instead of nanowatts or >> so you're going from watts to nano from nanowatts to watts. That's how big of a jump this is. So, the biggest criticism that we've heard from the free energy microchips is they say, "Oh, well, you're getting these tiny amounts of energy. Scale it up." That's what they say to Sunny White. That's what they say to Garrett Modell. They say, "Well, you got some pico watt of energy, but that's nothing. Now enter Gary Stevenson and he's saying we can actually scale this up with an array. We can actually use a number of tricks to scale this up powatt. Uh and so that's those are the real big gainers and that's why you want to work with high frequencies is because of that strain of f2 dependence and that gravitational wave power as f to the fourth power. Uh it's an enormous advantage from a signal strength point of view to go with higher frequencies. >> Okay. Okay. >> Yes. 18 zeros. >> So the Joseph's injunction part of this, this is really the new aspect. And I have a slide if it's okay, >> chat. We're making the term Joseph's injunction a household thing, too. I mean, it was already somewhat known, but we've gone from it being an obscure thing that people didn't really know about to now explain how Joseph's injunctions are basically in every quantum device. >> I want to put this up. Let me do a screen share very quickly. And so this is a graphic that you sent me that really describes um an HWSC gazer. So can you describe what this is for me, how it works, and let me pull up the same graphic because yours is kind of small and hard to read, but essentially what we're looking at is trying to force spin two transitions uh in in the quantum mechanical realm. Uh and so how do we do that? Well, Fontana conceptualized uh because he was a detector expert that you could you could motivate a spin to transition by coupling an S-wave superconductor to a D-wave superconductor. Uh typically a low temperature superconductor is S-wave typically for at least uh YBCO. >> Uh it is a it is a D-wave. Uh now I'm talking about Dwave and S-wave. Uh the context I'm using these terms is um they're they're in terms of orbital angular momentum symmetries. So, [clears throat] >> so when you talk about the different types of superconductors, basically we need different kinds of superconductors and when you look at them they have different atomic structures. Okay. Now, we can potentially make he's going to mention this. We can make them both potentially out of the same material and one of them could be like a doped version of it. Doped meaning you mess with the atomic structure to change its properties a little bit. So imagine trying to fit a whole bunch of people in a room, change their orientation and then doing that and altering it a little bit and in so we change the process. The point being if we set up this specific condition, this basically now turns into a tunnel where the light comes in one way and the gravity waves come out, gravitational waves come out the other side. Wow. looking at orbital angular momentum differences in the distribution inside these materials. Now, the individual gravitons are going to be too weak to measure individually. The trick is to make it a big enough and powerful enough gravitational wave at a certain frequency that you can actually measure it with a detector of the same design only flipped around. So, now you're you're getting a graviton in and getting photons out. So here's another one of the major criticisms is well even if this works how do you measure it? It's so small the effects that you can't even detect it from the background. So he says we are going to get around this by amplifying it using an array and focusing it along a specific frequency. focusing it along a specific frequency so that when we check that frequency, if we see the strong signal, we know that's coming from this little microchippy thing we made here. Wow. I mean, this is a directly testable thing at a bare minimum. >> And so the trick is then to get enough signal strength that you can actually measure it that way. So that's that's number one. Number two is macroscopic coherence gain. If you can make a number of these junctions and you can separate them by one wavelength, you can get a coherent wavefront. And the coherent wavefront then doesn't doesn't linearly scale. It scales as n squ. So we're playing two tricks here. We're going higher frequency to go frequency squared. And then we're also doing doing a number of emitters to go n^ squ. So we're we're pulling out every trick we can to try to boost the signal strength. >> So they're increasing the frequency and they're creating their array which is each separated by exactly one wavelength. So, you have to have the arrays sep set up in such a way where one wavelength hops from one to the next, chat. I love this [ __ ] This is This is exactly This is what I'm going to watch before I go to sleep tonight, if you know what I mean, chat. My goodness. Felony physics in full operation right now. >> Uh, reciprocity of design. All that is referring to is that you can use the same kind of device flipped around as a detector, which was really Giorgio's specialty, versus an emitter. You can use it in the middle. >> Here you go. You wanted your ghost murmur technology. Here's your ghost murmur technology for you. Here, right here. Look at this. Emission mode and detection mode. Just think about this. How would I turn this into a detector? Oh, well, I'm going in this way. Photon comes in, gravit gravity wave comes out. Well, on the other side, I'm just going to reverse it. Gravity wave comes in on this side. Photon comes out. I sent in the signal on this side. I got the signal out on this side. You've got a phone. You've got a communication system. Now, simple as that. Now, the question is, how fast do gravit gravitational waves travel? Do they travel instantly? Do they travel at the speed of light? H if we h if we needed a way to find our guy, all we needed if we needed to find that guy, that pilot in Iran, all we needed was for him to carry one of these devices and for us to have a device somewhere else and we're going to be able to find him. Boom. >> Mode or detector mode. The same device can be biased for emission or can be used passively uh as a detector. If you bias a Josephson injunction, you wind up with the AC Josephson effect which which creates an AC signal which is beneficial for us because if we pick the if we have a frequency in mind, we can we can bias it with a DC voltage and there's there's an exact correlation between that DC voltage and the frequency you'll get out of an AC Josephson junction. And so that >> Whoa. There you go, physics nerds. He says we can apply a DC voltage, direct current, and then we can have it based on the DC voltage we apply, we can get the exact AC frequency out that we want. That sounds like a tunable. I don't know, chat. I'm just a normal healthcare IT basic chongus. I don't know anything about these uh waves and physics and electrical engineering, but that sounds like a way where we could tune our wavelength to the exact size that we need. Especially when I'm building an array where I need every single array to be exactly one wavelength hop from the next one. Damn, I like this. Keep going, sir. That's the trick we're using here to make a gravitational wave. Uh it shows also the phased array approach on the right. It talks about estimates of power for 6 in versus 8 inch wafers. I've also done a layout on a 12inch wafer. These these are the 200 millimeter 8 inch wafer is like 140 or so emitters. If you go to a 12-in wafer, it's more like more like 300 emitters. And so that's that's designing for for 24 gigahertz. Why 24 gigahertz? It's first of all, it's an amateur band. So it's unregulated. Uh second of all it's a happy medium between we want a large number of emitters but we also want a frequency that is easy to use. If we start getting above 40 gigahertz or so the this become the tech becomes very difficult. So it's easier to work with manageable microwave style signals. And so that's why I picked this signal was it was the highest conveniently usable frequency that I could pack a lot of. >> So I mean this is so wellought out. It's so well thought out that the guy that said we make earthquakes, it's hard to argue with you, sir. I mean, we got we got dudes out here just spilling the beans on how to make gravitational detectors and emitters and amplify them up to significant scales. And you just have to wonder like, did the government already figure this out 10 years ago, 20 years ago, 30 years ago, longer? What kind of crazy weapons could we have designed with this technology? Earthquake weapons are honestly kind of trivial at this point. Directed energy weapons, things that just beam energy onto things. It's about to get to be a very scary world, guys. >> Wafer. That's that's why I picked that frequency. >> Okay, let's >> And if the quantum efficiency is decent, you can get as many as 83 dB. We don't have a good reading on quantum efficiency. So, I saw one of your questions was going to be, you know, what do the skeptics say? Well, the skeptics are going to say, hey, what's the quantum efficiency here? And so I had to compare with similar quantum efficiencies for other uh Joseph's and junction detectors. They are used by the way JJs are used for um nuclear detection, nuclear venom detection. So >> what JJ Joseph's injunctions are used for nuclear detonation detection? Uh of course they are. Of course they are. What What was I even thinking? I'm the one saying nuclear weapons are manipulating spaceime and you're saying that we use these Joseph's injunctions to detect nuclear detonations. Of course we do. Silly me. And the fact that Gary Stevenson's just casually dropping that right here. Damn. How many How does that guy How does he know this very knowledgeable guy? Yatsi indeed. Chat. Yatsi indeed. So this this is an important precedent and I used uh the quantum efficiency from that use to translate into this use. >> Okay. So let me stress how revolutionary this idea is, how timely and how well this fits with our existing technology base >> that for challenging environments such as underground mines uh that we could use this technology to communicate uh through the earth to underground facilities and underground mines. We also >> we could use this technology to communicate to underground mines. So this goes straight through solid matter. Straight through solid matter. And my first thought was, well, what about submarines? Because now this is just Hal Pudof's quantum communication patent from the '9s. How put off's quantum communication pattern from the 90s specifically calls out the Aaronhoff bomb effect which was the first half of this live stream, excuse me, and calls out uh using this to go through salt water or plasma. Now Gary Stevenson's presenting it is going through solid matter, which is also crazy, but it's almost like he avoided that specifically. Now listen to this follow-up. This is crazy. Watch this. If you were, do you think I'm the only one thinking that? >> Have a lot of government facilities that are underground. Uh, and if we want to communicate with them in a stealthy way, we could leverage this technology for something like that. >> Okay. And so that would also enable like submarine communications and things like that. >> Well, that's what I got that's why I got interested in this technology at first was because I was assigned to a redesign of the E6B program. Uh, they they talk to submarines. They work at very low frequencies, you know, on the order of 70 or 80 hertz. And that at that level frequency, you have to go through a lot of trouble to get a signal from the air to the ground. So we literally would have to fly the aircraft in circles, have a long trailing wire that's like kilometers long. And the submarine would have to have a kilometers long, you know, tail antenna coming out of the back. And that that's literally the only way we could talk to subs that were submerged. Uh, and so I had I was thinking there has to be a better way to this. And so that was my initial interest in these high frequency gravitational waves is Bob Baker had published in this area. And so I started following his work and that's ultimately what led led him to invite me to Paul Morad's, you know, MITER conference, the first HFGW working group. [clears throat] >> Gary Stevenson was on a project where they were trying to figure out how to communicate with submarines more effectively. Chat, live stream's over. Keep Gary safe, chat. I don't want to see any more General McCasslin [ __ ] out there. I've had enough. We already have one missing general. We don't need any more missing engineers out there, chat. Just kidding. We're not ending the live stream. You kidding me? This is great. >> If I remember correctly, and it has been a while since I dug into that this aspect of it, but you can also do remote sensing with this, right? And so, like one example of that might be looking for oil deposits underground. Another might be trying to see through walls or something that is just simply too solid for electromagnetic waves to to adequately resolve. Yeah, I I would have to part company with Bob Baker on those. Those those are very challenging aspects because we would be measuring very small phase shifts in the gravitational wave >> uh because it it doesn't interact very strongly with matter and so you have to have a lot of matter to see a little signal and so matter is essentially almost transparent to gravitational waves. So uh I wouldn't think it would be um useful for remote sensing of of matter distribution in the in the modern sense. However, if there was a metamaterial, if there was some kind of exotic matter present, uh if there was some kind of negative index matter uh that would bend a gravitational wave in an unusual way, okay, >> then then I could understand some remote sensing with it. And of course, that's that's why Haloff and Eric Davis were interested in it, right? >> Of course, that's why Eric Davis and Hal Pudof are interested in it, right? Honestly, I didn't know they were interested in it. But is it surprising? No. I'm interested in it, too. Uh, I haven't seen anybody else talking about turning photons into gravitons using a microchip. And I can see the connections to the free energy microchips, too. In some ways, this is a little bit superior to that. I want to have a phaser in my phone, chat. I want to have a phaser in my phone that can just zap the bad guys and make the bad guys go away. It's the ultimate second amendment. My phone in the future is going to be a free energy device. And it's going to be a phaser that just zaps people away. You point it at the bad people and pull the trigger and the bad people go away. Pey the pistol. Oh, I can't wait. I'm going to have a gazer and it's just going to annihilate any infidel that dares to commit a crime against me. Perfect. I love it. This is going to be a great dystopian future we have. I'm ready for it. >> Yeah. Well, and then you could also use this to sense artificially induced gravitational waves. Right. >> Well, that's exactly why why Poff was interested was he had the charter of trying to find out, you know, how does non-human intelligence craft work? We call that UAP adjacent technology. >> Pause chat. Uh, pause. Oh, well that's why Pudaf's involved because this is we're trying to figure out how the UFOs fly around and communicate. And we call this UAP adjacent technology. Who does? Who who calls it that? Name them. Say, who's calling this? I I'll call it that. It's UFO adjacent technology. Obviously, I knew it the whole time. If you didn't know it, you're a dumb dumb. Uh, apparently we got alien microchips. You know what? I'm down with it. Alien microchips, chat. It's already We've already had disclosure. The alien technology is right here. Honestly, this is alien technology to me. It really is, frankly. And so this is one candidate. We don't know for sure, but it is one candidate for UPA adjacent technology. The thought being that we don't know for sure, chat. It could be anything. It could be this thing that Hal Pudaf and Eric Davis and Gary Stevenson and Georgio Fontana went to the MITER conference and did all this. It could be anything. Could be this very specific thing, highly specific thing. Or it could just be something else. Could be [laughter] anything. [gasps] Holy [ __ ] chat. Where do I sign up for this? [laughter] >> Uh, in order to communicate through a warp bubble or a plasma bubble, you're not going to [crying and laughter] chat. To war to communicate through a warp bubble or a plasma bubble, you need something like this, chat. [clears throat] Boy, oh boy. >> To be able to use regular RF um frequencies to penetrate those kinds of environments. Those are very challenging environments. However, you could use hyper gravitational wave communication to penetrate those environments, which might mean, you know, instead of working in some other dimension or something, if they're communicating in our dimension, they may be able to be communicating using gravitational waves through these very challenging kinds of um craft structures. >> Ah, okay. So, to bring that back to human technology then, >> bro, this this interview just went off the rails and I'm here for every moment of it. I didn't realize you could just be like, "Hey, Gary, so how does this relate to alien technology?" And he would just pop off like this. Most of these people are shy about it. Gary's like, "Nah, we got this alien technology. This is alien tech. This is this is some [ __ ] we got from aliens. We figured it out. Now we're just doing it. We're building it." It's like, geez, could you be more casual about this? You're kind of dro you're dropping all the the secrets here at once on me. >> That reminds me of subspace communications from Star Trek. >> It would be This is like Ju Guiutsu Kaizen, man. He's coming out. He's like, "Can you please fight more subtly? You're you're being a little too brash right here with your the way you're exposing anti-gravity a little too just bluntly and forcefully for people. This is why I love Gary Stevenson, by the way, because the way he answers that just there's no you can tell he's just being perfectly honest. He's like not even trying to beat around the bush. He's like, "Yeah, it's just alien technology. We figured out from the UFOs. We've been working on it, building it. I do it all the time. It's just like just act like you've been there before, bro." It's like, "Oh, you don't you don't work on the alien technology. You didn't get that surgery." Yeah. Uh, sorry. The only people that get to work on this technology is me and Bruce Willis. You ever see Armageddon? Yeah, exactly. Space. I mean, it's not faster than light. Faster than light, you need quantum entanglement. So, that's, you know, that's instantaneous. Uh, we're talking about not this doesn't this doesn't invoke quantum entanglement. This is simply a way to get through matter, a way to get through plasmas, a way to get through warp bubbles. Um, because it does not interexter externally with those things. [clears throat] >> Okay. We don't even need quantum entanglement. Quantum entanglement. We don't even need that [ __ ] That's old. That's old [ __ ] We got just abilities to go through to go through a solid matter. Plasma bubbles and warp drives. Can just use straight up normal light gravitational waves. Don't even need the entanglement. Look at that way around it. People are like, "We can't figure out the UFO technology." Here's Gary Stevenson lightning. We figured out the UFO technology and turns out we don't even need entanglement. We can just go straight through solid matter just using these gravity waves or just convert light into gravity waves. All the dumb dums out there never just aren't paying attention to Giorgio Fontana apparently. >> Okay, I see what you mean. And again, some of the key advantages here and I still have the graphic up on the screen are I mean this uses conventional chip fabrication technologies, right? So >> and test test technologies and probing technology. So you would use cryop probes. >> Oh yeah. Yeah. And by the way, Gary Stevenson also just happens to be like some crazy expert on lithography and nano and nano fabrication. Like in addition to all this crazy uh you know uh what do you call um signals kind of intelligence type stuff >> that form factor makes in in the experiment itself. uh because a regular probe I mean if you use SMA connector for instance which is typically that's such an enormous heat link heat sink you could never keep anything down to you know four or seven Kelvin uh so you you really have to be careful with how you probe these devices that you're not leaking a lot of a lot of heat in >> yeah yeah no this is it is so exciting another place that my mind goes before I take this down is having these sensors right you've got arrays of sensors which I think is also potentially helpful for filtering out noise um being able to use these sensors for things like Dr. Sunny White's Casmer effect research or his warp drive research or reactionless drive research that's been going on for decades. There's no great measurement tools for that, right? >> So, if you you actually could get a link between a a transmitter and receiver, then you could put different metamaterials. You know, I think about all the metamaterial research that's been speculated about uh that >> but they're saying you can use this to detect the gravity waves, too. Of course. I mean, of course you can. So, if Sunny White and his microchip is manipulating spaceime, producing free energy from spaceime, this can also detect that. Of course, the government's already got this. This is we're like reverse engineering technology the government's already had. In fact, this is probably is just government technology. And how does it get out? Well, these guys work behind the scenes. And then you it's like a catch 22. You can't admit that that technology was stolen from them because then you're admitting that you have it. And you're not supposed to have it. Pretty crazy. Yeah. And you can change it back into light, which gives you signaling and communication capability. The same signal that got converted to a graviton can come out back as a signal. The same message that came in just a game of telephone. Now, okay, I'm going skip ahead a little bit here. Quantum effects to micros microscopic levels. [clears throat] >> Yeah. um impact the gravitational pairs of superconductors that are separated by a very very thin insulating layer. So it's like a transistor except it's superconducting and the insulating layer is such that it only allows electrons to tunnel through it. So it's a tunneling type of of transistor and only coherent electron pairs can tunnel through it. So because it's superconducting so this allows uh the device to magnify quantum effects to micros microscopic levels. [clears throat] >> Okay. >> Boom. This allows the device to amplify these effects to macroscopic levels. This feels like the missing link from going from yes, this is real, but it's too small to be measurable and too small to make a difference and too small to charge anything to now scaling this up to now we can produce a a gravity wave where you can feel the pushing effect where you can feel the work being done. And this can also then be used to test other people's gravity wave production devices. to see if they're working, including stuff that Sunonny White has been working on where he's been working on both warp drives and he's been working on his free energy microchip. >> So the term, and again folks read this in the description, the term we've used is gazer, which is like a laser for gravitational waves. Now does the laser analogy fully hold when you get into gravity or or where does this >> to some extent? So, so laser stands for light amplification uh stimulated emission of radiation. So, what's the same is we're stimulating a radiation, an emission of radiation. So, the se part is the same. Now, we're simulating the radiation of gravitons versus photons. So, that's the difference between a laser and a gazer. Where the analogy somewhat breaks down is when you have a laser, you're sending light in and then it starts getting amplified. In this particular case, we're we're we're stimulating it by biasing the Joseph and junction to to create the AC effect with spin 2. So we're there's no amplification per se. What we're what we're really doing is we're just generating gravitons using this by >> So it's not a same kind of amplification as a laser. In a laser amplification, you send a beam of light in there and it hits the the medium of gas and then it uh causes all of those particles to be excited. And then when population inversion occurs, when most of the population has been excited, then you get this stimulated emission. Now, in this situation, we're saying that this isn't exactly how it's working. Now, instead, we're just building an array of all these things that is converting light into gravitons and we're having them amplify from their shared effects uh geometrically aligned. So slightly different but same ultimate idea and concept of what we're trying to accomplish a larger amplified effect. >> Yes. And so that's where the analogy breaks down is it's not really truly an amplification of gravitons. It's a generation of them. >> Okay. But like >> a and gazer [laughter] >> like a laser though that a laser uses coherence. That is a key. >> They're both coherent sources. Yes. That's right. >> Yeah. And so that that coherent I wanted to focus in on that because many tiny quantum systems acting together produce an effect that a single system can't produce on its own. Right. >> Well, that's right. And that's the whole point of going to the higher frequencies. That's the whole point of of of coherent arrays of these things. Uh essentially, you know, I I grew up in in the microwave realm of of phased array antennas. So I just applied that same phase array u thinking to these gravitational emitters. >> So he's an expert on phased array systems as well. Gary Stevenson is yeah Gary guaranteed he's familiar with the work of Tom Beardarden and scalar physics which I saw a lot of people mentioning in the chat definitely there's some overlap but it's not the same now I should ask in practice how difficult would it be to build a prototype sender receiver pair for these I mean do you have any guesstimates on on what the cost would be and what would your preferred first test be for this >> well you want to see if you can really couple because there's you can you can say it's emitting but until you measure the emission there's no way of telling. So, you really do have to have a pair to start out with. And so, that that requires at least two devices. Uh, and I had some initial estimates from from a micro electronics lab that does specialty arrays, specialty wafers at UC Davis. They have a microeleronics lab there, but that was for different materials than what we're talking about now because they they weren't they weren't scoping YBCO. Uh, and last time I talked to Fontana, he really stressed for the for the type two for the for the sorry, for the D-wave, it's not type two and type one. That's where I got confused. It's S-wave and Dwave. And so for a D-wave, you really have to have the YBCO or BSCCO. You have to have some cube. >> Okay, how much is it going to cost? >> Right like that. The cube rates are the ones that have these distributions. This this this quadripole distribution, and that's what you need for a spin 2 transition. That's what you need for a gravitational wave made of gravitons. uh and so you really do need a device uh with YBCO. YBCO is very difficult, one of the most difficult materials in the world to work with. So these would be, you know, very expensive devices, probably on the order, I mean, if you're doing custom fabrications of YBCO, we're probably talking on the order of hundreds of thousands of dollars. You know, if you're if you're hundreds of thousands of dollars, free energy ain't cheap, chat. Turns out we all thought free energy was gonna be free. Turns out it's expensive as [ __ ] chat. Now you know why Sny White raised $12 million for his microchip because you have to fabricate a bunch. You got to test it. You got to have proven results and then you got to do mass fabrication and commercialize it. That can easily burn through millions of dollars. Easily. But when we get there, theoretically, you got a trillion dollar company, >> an angel investor. It's It's not a lot of money. It's a lot of money to me. >> Okay, let's skip ahead a little bit. I only want to look at two more parts. Here we go. Somewhere around here. I don't remember where it was. >> Just gravitational waves so that we're not only viewing them from the paradigm of astrophysical events, but also as signals. And that that's where the disconnect is right now, I think, with the astronomers and the the GR experts is they're used to this enormously small coupling between gravitation and matter. But that coupling is quite different when you start looking at the higher frequencies. It's quite dramatically different. So yes, there's 47 orders of magnitude in the mud where where the coupling is. if you just look at it that way. But if you start multiplying by 18 orders of magnitude for using a higher frequency and then another probably another 10 orders of magnitude if you can do on a phased array suddenly you're you got the problem within 20 orders of magnitude or so which as a as a satellite comp person former satellite comp person doesn't scare me anymore because you know 200 dB of loss is not a big thing for satellite people. It's like that's every day. >> Wow. Wowzers. So there he is. He's saying that if we do two concepts, one go to ultra high frequencies that increases our output by 18 orders of magnitude. The other option phased array that's another 10 orders of magnitude on top of that. So he's saying now we've solved or we are trying to solve the problem that all the critics say there's not enough energy coming out of this. The the effects are too small. If this works it's game over for all the classic physicists, all the classic physics debunkers that are out there. Their world view would be shattered by this. >> Yeah. And this seems like it also answers one of the major criticisms skeptics have had in looking at propulsion aspects of this. They're saying, "Okay, even if there's an effect, it may be weak." And when you're looking at the communications aspects, that is very normal. We just compensate for it. >> Yeah. Yeah. So, so those kinds of numbers are fine for commulsion, I don't know that you get a lot of oomph out of that. You would have to use a much higher power. Uh and then you have to find a way to rectify it, find a way or or multiplex different frequencies. Uh there's this this trick in foyer transforms where you can get a square wave out of adding frequency 1* 3 * 5 and and putting together those different frequencies gives you a different overall waveform. And did you just say square wave chat? Did I just hear Gary Stevenson say square wave where we found that that was potentially the secret because the relaxation and the excitation waves don't perfectly match. You can use those combinations of different high frequency gravity waves potentially to have a waveform shaped wavefront that can give you a field propulsion potentially. Now, how strong? So, you could use this for field propulsion, but it's not going to be very powerful. So, this would maybe be a very very very weak propulsion effect. You're not going to use these microchips to make a warp drive except for on a very very very tiny scale. This is why you need the plasma. plasma is producing the extremely powerful electromagnetic effects we need on the large scale to manipulate actual spaceime macroscopically. But these effects will these devices will still have more practical use for us than plasma balls will teleporting us around. These devices will allow us to communicate through solid matter. In some cases, communicate at the speed of light or faster than the speed of light. No lag or minimum lag. And these devices will be able to allow us to have free energy at least on our phones. Now powering our whole houses maybe not, but we'll get there. >> Is that that's not just an engineering problem? That's a difficult physics problem, too. >> Gary, if it's okay, I'd like to share the quantum high frequency gravitational wave blueprint that you sent me as well. >> Okay. [clears throat] uh and you'll look at the the semi-class doesn't really have this N2 scaling that the that the quantum effect has because the quantum factor allows these quantum emitters to be coherent. There's no notion of coherence in in general relativity. >> So right there this is the huge difference. There's no element of coherence in general relativity. This is the gap between the classical and the quantum limit. This is why I can already feel Sabine Hosenfelder seething preparing her next counter signaling physics video obsessed with us chat living rentree. This is why these devices can amplify beyond what quantum sabine and the classic physicists believe is possible. the semiclassical theory does not have the coherence gain and why the array amplifies this effect. So ultimately at the end of the day I guess we'll just have to see it. I mean this if we build this and it does it and it works and it amplifies the effect and the effect is stronger than the classic theory predicts then we'll know we'll know it's true. I'll go ahead chat. I'm going to go ahead and bet all my money that exists in this world that this is true and that this effect is real and that there really is an ether. And why am I going to do that? Because I've just watched a plane get teleported out of the sky and this is definitely the same physics they're using. Definitely. So, the aliens didn't download the information into my brain. just straight up classic old school investigative journalism at play right here. >> So that's that's called the coherent gain and it's pointing out that when you start using that using the quantum approach versus the semiclassical approach you actually wind up with a depending upon n quite a drastically different answer. So that's the first thing I would >> drastically different answer >> point out with these slides >> and then if it's okay let me go down to I want to go down to the the physical mechanism the HTSC gazer >> look at that next because that that points out the differences in material uh type >> okay I'm going to skip over the type thing because he basically says that we might be able to produce both sides of this with the same material make this a lot easier the one they're doing right here is using two completely different materials But this requires two different temperatures, which is now another engineering challenge. Still works, but you know, you can imagine from a practical perspective, it'd be nicer if we could just cool this whole thing to one temperature. So, let's skip ahead of that. Go on to like about here >> limiters. Okay. So, >> about frequency selection. I don't want to get too ind depth with this, especially since I know you're going to be present. >> This is the this is the most detailed we're going to get into the frequency selection and picking the frequency and finding the right frequency. So, pay attention >> presenting this in the future and I'm going to put a link in the show notes. I'm going to put links to all of our information. >> The nutshell version of this is that you'll see that frequency of the dosus injunction AC do injunction effect. It it it goes according to that exact frequency. So, if you put in a certain voltage, you get a certain frequency. it's 483 terz divided by voltage. And so these are very small bias voltages, right? Uh that if you want to get down to the gigahertz, you're you're in the nano or millolts uh in order to do that. So but that's that those are the that's the fundamental frequency based effect. So that's all being described here. So for instance, for 24 gigahertz, >> you only need 49.7 microvolts of operating voltage across these little emitters. >> Okay. So low power, low power, low power. These are low power. So many of them. So these are very low energy devices which we kind of already knew in terms of how much energy it takes to run these things. >> Amazing aspects of this. So let me go down to phased array geometry. This is I mean again you've gone through this whole thing. You're working up a complete >> Yeah. So these layouts are very poor. Uh the AI got confused. >> This is the part that I think Jenny Nielsen would appreciate the most. The geometry because this geometry is going to be the same underlying geometry as the structure of her theory in my opinion. We'll see >> here. If you want to look at the real layouts, you can look at my briefing separately. Uh but the idea is to orient these emitters and receivers so that there's one wavelength separating each of them. There's the bigger wafer you have, the more emitters you you have to use the the one full wavelength spacing. Uh and then the pad size for the emitter shouldn't be any more than a quarter wavelength because you start getting out of phase. So there's a certain limit to the size of each emitter pad uh as as we do in microwaves. Uh and so that's that's the idea here. And so even though these particular layouts are notional, uh you can look you can look at my briefing for the layouts. >> Okay. And and then uh let me see beam focusing. And >> yeah, so Fontana was looking at this um and came to the same conclusion. You can't you can't create a lens out of matter that is going to change the phase of gravitational waves because the interaction is so weak. What you can do is shape the emitter so that it's just a delta t that's that's causing them all to come into focus. >> It's creating a delta t because you you have shaped all the emitters so that the delays are all correct to all come together together. >> So like like a spheroid type section or you can do it with a flat one and then just do time delays into each emitter which is what we do with phaser antennas on aircraft. So right there he's talking about building in a time varying condition. He's talking about changing the delta t and taking advantage of the obsverse chat. We're all living in the obsverse. Everyone's going to be calling it that. Eric Weinstein called it the obsverse. Taking in fact this right here immediately made me think about the plasma orbs. They must be using the exact same type of effect on a macroscopic level. Okay. >> So, so we we can still create a focused array, but you're doing it with time delays versus with a big curve. >> Well, it's interesting looking at the physical curve, right? Um, that reminds me of something I was reading about. So, when you talked about the the phase ray delay, >> we can do it with a time delay instead of a physical curve. So, you would say, Ashen, how can you just use three orbs to make a wormhole? Don't you have to make like a full bubble? And this is almost I think this is what Gary Stevenson's saying is that no, we don't need that. We can actually simplify it using the math and quantum mechanics. We don't need to have a full spherical bubble around this. We can just set up our array in an intelligent way. >> Wow. >> What immediately came to mind just a few moments ago was like a Fresno lens. >> Yeah. Okay. Let's get that a little bit. >> Okay. Yeah. >> You can separate them by quite a bit. So you separate them uh and then you'll have the r squ or the d squ distance fall off um because you're changing the radius here. But never >> okay I think we got that part. Let's go to the end. I think you asked some oh here we go. Here's the the next steps. So you measured with your with your wave as well as the s wave in which case the whole thing could be cooled you know in a yeah I mean the immediate term is is build this and test it in a lab. Uh there are other fundamental breakthroughs that describe and we talked about this a little bit that YBCO might be able to be used for the D-Wave as well as the S-wave in which case the whole thing could be cooled you know at a much higher temperature maybe not 70 but maybe like 40 or 50 Kelvin. >> Why by the way guys why does this feel like we're we're like watching some Nobel Prize winning thing like years in advance? Why does it feel like that? like there's nothing like this out there and it feels like such an obvious thing based on the research of of Fontana. It's like how we're trying to get a gravitational effect. There should be some coupling and what what Gary Stevenson was saying earlier is that perhaps the reason why we're not seeing this coupling is because we need to increase the frequency. We increase the frequency and the effect of this coupling electromagnetic coupling to gravity becomes much stronger becomes much stronger with an increase of frequency. uh it depends upon what the doping level is. Uh and then um if you if you have a link budget that you've successfully characterized, you can use this for basically gravomagnet magnetics testing to test metamaterials. If you have a theory about materials shaping a wavefront or changing gravitational aspects, you could test it. You actually have a test bed now. So that that would be very beneficial. >> Amazing. So Gary, let me stop sharing on >> is that it? I thought that's not like a whole lot of details like well we could just uh build this and test this like okay what's the next step you know what keep Gary safe chat we don't we don't need to I don't have any more questions I don't need to know anything more about it just keep doing what you're doing bro keep doing what you're doing I can't wait for the next presentation on the Josephson Junction gravitational wave I'm calling it amplifier even though technically it's a gazer chat Okay, our moment of zen tonight. Very special moment of zen tonight. Where's my guy? Hold on. Let me get it ready. Oh boy, this is dramatic. Let [snorts] me see what we got. Oh, you know what? There was one more clip I was going to play before we go to that. I want to play this clip of uh James Woodward explaining the warp drive. Hopefully, if you've learned something tonight, this will make more sense to you than it did at the beginning of the live stream. So, here you go. >> People in the 0oint field all cranked up because, oh, the ether, the zero point field and so on. And what he meant was spacetime is the gravitational field. It is not something else. It is. Gravity is not something in spaceime. It is spacetime. >> My goat. Gravity is not something in spaceime. It is spacetime. 0 point energy is spacetime. Do you get it? You say, Ashton, well, if all this energy is keeping up all the atoms everywhere, then we must be in some kind of ocean of energy. Yeah. It's called spacetime. It's called everything you're in all the time. Exactly. That's what people need to get through their head. Gravity isn't some effect that's being exuded. Gravity is spacetime being morphed, being bent, being shapen. So when you manipulate gravity, you are manipulating space time. That's why when you make wormhole, when you get a sufficiently Jupiter mass of negative rest mass matter in a sphere, say 10 m in diameter or thereabouts, you can create a wormhole. Okay? When you manipulate gravity, you are manipulating spaceime. Thank you, Laura Luo. Thank you. When you manipulate gravity, you're manipulating space. And that's why I say we have spacetime manipulation technology. A because it's true and B because it's also technically accurate. The problem is where do you get a Jupiter mass of 10 of negative rest mass matter and the answer to that question if you read chapters 7 8 and 9 chapters 7 8 and 9 like Salvatore Pais's equations 7 8 and 9 he says everybody agrees if I have the matter mass energy of Jupiter I can create a wormhole but we need negative negative energy. Where are we going to get the negative energy from, chat? Remember, our balloon is already squished. We need to unsquish our balloon. And when we unsquish it, we get the negative energy. So, let's listen to what Woodward has to say. Is it's all around us. You indeed contain within you an utterly enormous amount of negative rest mass matter. It's the bare mass of all of the elementary particles that make you up everywhere around us. It's the bare mass of all the particles that make up you. It turns out the energy we need is all around us everywhere. He's saying the exact same thing. >> The only reason why it isn't exposed is because of the gravitational action of everything else in the universe on you. And if you can find a way to screen that interaction, you reveal a bare mass. He says all the other stuff, everything is connected and it's all keeping everything stable. If you can screen that away, boom, negative energy. If you can screen the gravity away, screen that pushing force, stop the balloon from being pushed down, boom, the balloon will expand automatically because the balloon wants to expand. It's just being prevented from doing so all the time. And now you've got your Jupiter mass and negative breast mass mass. >> Okay. And that's that's that's a real real real tall order. But if >> the experiences that you and >> your compatriots are having and all that are true, it means that someone is or something has figured out how to do this. Okay. But within the physics that is we know today that's as far as I can see the only hope of making either warp drives or wormholes. >> Beautiful. Beautiful. >> Wow. Beautiful chat. Beautiful. Now you see this has been out there waiting to be discovered for a long long time. And it's been an US problem. It's been a psychology problem. All that needed to happen was for us to wake up and realize these guys aren't full of [ __ ] We just needed the proof and evidence that would make it undeniable. That's why I asked Pat Vetted on Saturday, check out the the podcast, guys. I asked him, "Well, if those videos ended up being true, the MH370 videos, you would agree we must have this crazy technology." And he said, "Yeah, if those got proven real," he would because there it is. This is why I say all this stuff is real. I realized those videos were real and then just followed the science and boom, there it is. It's all just here and turns out it's all the government contractors, government engineers, and they're bragging about it. Bragging about it on podcast because nobody believes it anyway. You just have to watch and learn and see for yourself. Guys, we have a live I think this is live. Sabine Hosenfelder has been watching watching the live stream. We've got a reenactment live reenactment of Sabine Hosenfelder watching the live stream. We MH370X is represented by this bison here just chilling. He's enjoying Look at he's loving life, rolling around, enjoying the zero point energy. And these look at these douchebags back here pissing him off. Look at him. Oh [ __ ] they were talking [ __ ] This is what happens when you talk [ __ ] about zero point energy right here. Let's go full screen. Oh, see the four orbs curse is coming. The four orbs curse is coming for you, Sabine. Look at her run. Look at her run, chat. You can't escape the four orbs curse. It will find you. We're messing around with that tree. Oh. Oh. Oh, he she thought she could hide. This is This is Elon retweeting. Oh, Elon reposts. GG's. Woo! The four orbs curse comes for everyone, chat. Remember that quantum sabine, remember it. Rest in peace. I hope she recovers quickly from that mogging the other day. Let's go to the super chats, guys. Thank you for hanging out tonight. Thank you for appreciating the science stream. I know these are the most boring ones for my dum dums out there. [snorts] Mick Leonard says, "I wish I could teleport the libs chat." We're not going to teleport. We're not going to waste teleportation technology on them. They don't even believe in science anyway. Why would we waste teleportation technology on them? No, we're going to shoot them to the moon in a classic doomsday rocket that will just possibly blow up from anything touching it randomly. We're going to shoot them up in a conventional rocket that will make them feel comfortable. We're going to send them to the moon and we're going to put them on the moon base and they'll have all their basic needs ver uh you know, food, uh video games, anime. It's going to be very humane and very legal. Everything about it. They're going to love it, chat. They're going to love it the most. Thank you, Mick Leonard, for that. I appreciate you. J Beach loves ZPE says, "What's the difference between a hippo and a Zippo? One's very healthy and one's a little lighter." Oh, we got the Laffy Taffy Dad jokes. Thank you very much, Z Beach. Uh JB Beach, I appreciate you. XLX says check out his up uh UHT yuan theory guys says yes sir we're out here trolling the government agencies for fusion you should see the feed lmao at gov nuclear energy I've been shoving my reactor blueprints down their throats on their feeds pitching to the goats themselves pudof congratulations sir keep it up make sure you are going in for your health your your doctor's appointments and checks. Make sure you're not going to any empty elevator shafts. Be very safe. Keep everyone very safe who we've been revealing and talking about here tonight. Brian Pemble, shout out to you. Thank you very much for that super chat. Says, "Great work, Ashton. Cavitation." Think about cavitation. What is cavitation? Cavitation is the bubble walls collapsing. This is why Julian Schwinger realized this must be a zero point energy effect in sonoluminescence. Look at what happens with the orbs converging. We're seeing the boundary conditions rapidly changing. It's actually all about the boundary conditions changing the zero point energy walls. The walls are changing changing the zero point energy modes just like the casmir effect. Dynamic Casemir effect and boundary conditions. Once again, that's tonight's felony physics topic. And then lastly, Chaotic Good says, "Not me trying to hire Ashton lookalike that got fired from Chili's to be my pool boy." Oh, yo, chat. When Piers Morgan goes away, Mr. Mr. Four Orbs comes out to play your new pool boy. Mr. Four Orbs. Can you imagine four Orbs lookalikes in the future playing pool boy to desperate housewives? Chat, I could see it. I could see it becoming a reality. Guys, remember spaceime is not empty. And also, anytime, anywhere, the VPU2 is watching you and maybe maybe teleporting you with some lightning bolts. Have a good night, MH370X. I love you guys. Peace out. Later. >> [music] >> Out in the fields where the skies are wide, talking [music] about a journey through the cosmic ride. Einstein [singing] and Thorn, they set the stage for a trip through time across the space age. Wormholes connect distant points in space. Traversible [music] paths to a far off place. No black holes pull, no crushing weight, just a cosmic tunnel to a distant gate. talking wormhole, stargates, [music] negative energy travel through the cosmos. It's our destiny. MH370, where did it go? Bing [music] 7 through a wormhole. Flow with talking wormhole. Stargates, negative energy. Travel through the cosmos. It's [music] our destiny. MH370. Where did it go? Boing trip [music] 7 through a wormhole. Flow. >> [music] >> Exotic matter, negative energy is the key to stabilize the wormhole for you and me. Quantum vacuums squeeze so tight, creating conditions [music] for this wondrous flight. Static fields and lasers in the lab. They play generating forces in a new kind of way. Gravitational squeezing cast force negative zones. [music] We need to stay the course. Stalking wormhole star gates negative energy. Travel through the cosmos. It's our destiny. [music] MH370. Where did it go? Boing trip 7 through a wormhole. Thin shell [music] formalism plate so fine. Spherical geometry. We realign energy [music] conditions that we must defy for a stable wormhole. Let's give it a try. [music] [music] Forces balancing the plate, creating the throat, opening gates from Earth to the stars in [music] a single bound. A shortcut through space profile. Engineers and dreamers hold the key to future worlds and what we could be. With science in hand, we forge ahead through the cosmic paths that we now tread. [music] We're talking wormholes, [music] stargates, negative energy. Travel through the cosmos star destiny. MH370. Where did it go? Blowing triple 7 through a wormhole flow. From the fields to [music] the stars, we break the chains. Understanding the universe, we make the gain. [music] Little hoola crunk shines, bringing truth to light. Through his music, we'll explore the night with wormholes and stargates. [music] Our path is clear. Exploring the cosmos. Our future's here.