The $25,000 Bounty

What do you think Trump will do because Trump says he'll end this day one the US pays for 90% of it I think he can. >> He's going to be the adults in the room. He's he's basically everything from the Malaysian flight that went away. I'm convinced that was a shot at China. Don't mess with us. That's six generation war. That's all we got though because it's not the Biden administration running this.

This is a lot of people in the house or whatever but the thing with Russia, China, Taiwan, North Korea, Trump will come in and he will say all right everyone first of all everyone stand up as I sit down. I'm the adult in the room. Everyone knock it off which they will but right now China, Russia, Iran, North Korea they they've gotten till January 20th of next year. That and they they know it. It's coming but again the Malaysia flight too was a was one shot at China saying knock it off. >> Ashton Forbes,

you know that super jacked guy. >> Malaysian 370 contact Ho Chi Minh 120.9 good night. >> Breaking news tonight a Malaysia Airlines flight [music] with 239 people on board including four Americans >> [music] >> has gone missing. >> Even as these grainy satellite images released today by the Chinese government >> Again the Malaysia [music] flight too was a was one shot at China saying knock it off. >> Why shoot it down if it's not hostile? >> Our technologies [music] permit us to manipulate time and space. >> Why would Americans do that? >> Any distance annihilated. [music] >> This country is very powerful. >> [music] >>

Far more powerful than people understand. We have weaponry that nobody has any idea what it is and it is the most powerful weapons in the world. Not even close. >> I remember the line from the Hindu scripture [music] the Bhagavad Gita. Vishnu >> [music] >> is trying to persuade the prince that he should do [music] his duty. And to impress him takes on his multi-armed form. [music] And he says, "Now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds." >> [music] >> I suppose we all thought that one way or another. >> Welcome to the greatest technology live stream on the entire internet. Simple as that.

Rest in peace MH370. Guys, let's get right to it tonight. We got some stuff I want to talk about. Didn't do a live stream on Friday. There's news that we need to discuss, politics we need to cash in on Ashton was always right about everything's ville once again. We need to talk a little bit about the Hard Truths podcast that happened on Saturday.

If you didn't watch the Hard Truths podcast with Ryan Wood on Saturday, you need to check that out. And then in addition to all of that, I got Tim Ventura lined up for next week, too. But the reason why you're all here, the breaking news, technically as of Friday, the bombshell, where's Pat from vetted? Put it in the thumbnail. Ashton Forbes drops bombshell bounty. 20 5 thousand dollars.

Yes. $25,000 bounty by me and me alone for one cloud photo archived on the internet prior to May 19th, 2014. That's it. Why? Because the MH370 videos are real and some people have been lying about them on the internet. People have been lying about them on the internet and they're getting caught. And so I'm putting my money on the line to prove to you that I'm right and that these people are fraudsters.

They're They're not just fraudsters, they're literal con artists and they're not just lying. They're knowingly lying, trying to convince you of a lie, trying to make you believe the MH370 videos are fake. They're doing it as a job with a purpose. That's the difference. That's why it's so malicious. And so this is to prove to you that these people are con artists.

That's the reason why I'm putting the bounty on the table. Now, what is the bounty and why? Let's [snorts] keep it simple. They like to make things very confusing. They when they post something they're sometimes they don't even explain what it is. They'll just be like, "Look, this is obviously the videos are fake now."

They'll say, "Oh, the reticle disappears. That means it's a it's a the layers are wrong and and blah blah." You're like, "Dude, you don't know anything about military surveillance. Just sit down and shut the hell up." Okay, I'm calling your bluff. You don't know anything about anything.

Their videos are real. It doesn't look real to you because you don't know how military surveillance works. So, my claim, very straightforward, this photograph right here is fake. It's going to pull up, right? Okay, there it is. This photograph that you see right here is fake.

Now, what do I mean by that? I mean that at a bare minimum, the metadata on this photo that came along with it is fake. The metadata that say says that this photo's from 2012 is fake. Is that clear enough? This is not a photo from Japan and it's not from 2012. At a bare minimum, I can prove to you that's the case or I can I can say with 100% confidence that's the case.

Now, if that's the case, when is this photo actually from? This photo is from the Nicobar Islands on March 8th, 2014. That's the real date of this photo. I can tell you the real date of this photo. If this is a real photo as in some system took this from a camera, then it was taken by an MQ-9 Reaper in the Nicobar Islands on March 8th, 2014. That's the exact date of this photo.

That's the exact date. Now, how do I know that? Because again, I know the MH370 videos are real and this these clouds are in those videos. So, let me If you If you somehow you're still confused, because when someone explains something very simply and clearly, people that can't accept it begin to have a mental breakdown. So, I'm going to say one more time. This photo is fake.

The metadata on this photo is fake. This is not a pic This is not a picture from Japan in 2012. No one will ever in the world be able to prove that. This is actually a photo from the Nicobar Islands on March 8th, 2014. So, the bounty is very simple. No one will ever be able to find this photo before the date that it was taken because that's how time works.

So, if this photo is actually from March 8th, 2014 as I claim, this photo cannot exist anywhere on the internet before that date, no matter what, unless someone can go back in time. Which, ironically, maybe Okay. So, that's the deal. There it is. Now, I want to show you something. I want to do an analysis of this photo real quick.

What's the easiest way to do this? Oh, yeah. Okay, pull this up. I know what we're going to do here. I'm going to [snorts] share my second monitor cuz I actually want to show you that they're also lying about they're saying like, "Oh." Or, for example, I was watching Sneezy Monkey on Friday or Saturday.

One of these debunkers. Someone would ping me and say, "This guy's talking about you." And I come in and he's talking about NROL-22 and he's saying how absurd this is. And I'm like, "You just have to explain what it is that we're looking at. Explain it clearly." And he's misconstruing all the arguments.

He's saying, "Why would they fake 19 photos? Why would they fake 20 photos here?" And I'm going, "They don't. They didn't. They only have to fake one photo." There's only one photo that has to be fake.

Maybe a couple of the others are fake that come along with it. That's a larger question. But, I know for sure that this photo is fake because I can tell you, just like I said, this is actually from March 8th, 2014. Okay. So, [snorts] let me see if I have this up on my recents. Is this it?

Where is it? This one. No, no, that's not it. Hold on. >> [snorts] >> Let me find it on my Twitter. So, I have the What I'm going to do here is I'm going to compare to you the photo against the unwrapped Gorgon Stare wide area motion imagery and show you that there's no question that they match. Like this has to be the clouds, the real clouds.

Now, one more thing I want to point out I want to debunk another point that I hear people making cuz people intentionally misconstrue everything I say. So, you can use this live stream to fact check them. They say that I claim that someone made the cloud photo from the videos. Nobody is claiming that. They say it's impossible to make a CR2 image from the low-quality videos. Therefore, your argument doesn't make sense.

Well, nobody's making that argument, so there you go. I'm telling you the CIA and the military has the original source. This is Gorgon Stare Whammy. It does actually use photos to make the video system. That's how the system really works in the real world. So, it's possible that photo is a real photo from the real system.

That's why I say the CIA planted it because only people that have that system can plant the photo. You get what I'm saying? Kind of like only Jonas De Roe could make the videos. Because you realize there's a chain of custody involved in these systems. There's a chain of custody involved in the cloud photos. Now, [snorts] the debunkers are claiming this is their positive claim that these photos were uploaded on the internet in 2012.

They're claiming this is their claim. you can read their claims. They say that the metadata that says if you right click on it, profile says 2012, this can be modified in 5 seconds. They say that combined with the word of an anonymous website owner who's nobody ever seen or talked to. That website owner claims he uploaded and processed these images, the one I just showed you in 2012, on the website on the internet. That's fake. That didn't happen. He never processed these images.

That's a fake story. And they say, "No, it's not. I believe the website owner." I say, "Okay, then why can't we find the images on the internet? You're the one telling me he uploaded them on the internet on a website that we confirmed was archived on the internet and archived in torrents. The photos don't exist. You can win $25,000 from me and all you have to do is find a URL of the archive showing those photos existing before May March 8th, 2014, or May 19th, 2014, when the videos were published.

That would prove by the virtue of passage of time that I am a liar and that the videos are fake. The reason why you see debunkers not addressing this, not jumping all over this, is because they know. They know there's no way They know those photos don't exist. Instead, you see them changing the subject, trying to say, "Oh, Ashton has to prove the photos are fake." Uh look, man, I put $25,000 on the line. And I'll tell what, to even go take it a step further, I will also show you they're operating in bad faith.

If they want to make a claim for me, if they're so sure the videos are fake, offer me $25,000 to go interview Edward Lynn. I've said Edward Lynn is the one that leaked the videos. I've never spoken to him. I've called him on my live streams. Offer me $25,000 to go get a a confession from Edward Lynn and I'll be on the flight tomorrow. They're not going to do that though, cuz they're afraid. They're deathly afraid.

They're deathly afraid of me going to talk to Edward Lynn and him potentially saying that he did do it on a video. Then what? I'll take that 25,000. That's the difference between them and me. That's why you see them crashing out about this and why I should have done this a long time ago. Now, I didn't necessarily have 25 in the bank a long time ago to be able to pull it off, but also, and I'm going to show you guys a comparison in a second, I increased the bounty from 10,000 to 25,000 cuz I wanted to show I'm serious.

Nobody's going to question that I have 25,000. They're literally calling me grifters saying that I'm making money hand over foot, which I'm not making as much as they claim, but I have 25 in the bank that I can risk. And this is not a small amount to me. This is not an amount where I'm like, "Hey, I've got million dollars in the bank and I'm going to risk 25,000 on this." This is a significant amount of money of all the money I have in the bank that I'm willing to risk on this. Again, to show you how serious I am.

And this will persist. This bounty doesn't even have to go away. The fact that nothing was found in the first 3 days of this bounty already being out there is a pretty strong indicator that nobody will ever be able to find the photo. That the photo simply does not exist when they claim it did. And again, I want to I want to once again tell you it's their claim that somebody uploaded this on the internet in 2012. Because if nobody uploaded this photo on the internet, then nobody could have made the videos. Because who who made the videos?

Jonas De Roe? You think Jonas De Roe made these videos? Good luck with that. Who else in Who else who has access to Jonas De Roe's hard drive and photos knows how Boeing 777s work, the physics of exotic vacuum objects, the missing airplane, military surveillance? This is the reason why they're not blaming Jonas is because they know for sure he doesn't him and nobody in his sphere of influence meets the requirements to make the videos. They need them to be on the internet.

And they're not. They don't exist online. So, I'm saying my opinion, but it is a fact, they're lying to you. They're misrepresenting the facts, and they're claiming these videos have been proven fake using fake evidence. And this isn't the first time they've been caught falsifying evidence. They also got caught faking the shockwave comparison.

There's like three different versions of the same VFX. Did you guys know that? If you confront the debunkers on this, they will admit that I'm right. There's like three different versions of the exact same shockwave VFX that they use and they interchangeably switch around whenever they need to try to get something to match. It's actually insane how dishonest these people are. Now, let me pull this comparison up here.

I almost had it ready to go. Oh, I know what I was doing. Here we go. It's right here. I had it up ready to go. >> [clears throat] >> I think this will work. >> [snorts] >> We're going to try this out. Full screen share chat.

Chance of Ashton leaking personal information very high. Here we go. Should be fun. I'm ready for it. Okay. This right here is what we call the unwrapped Gorgon stare whammy.

Why do I mean that? Because if you take the videos and if you take the Gorgon stare whammy video, which was labeled satellite satellite video, and you unwrap this, if you assume this is a larger field of view, watch the screen move. Sorry, I'm not doing it right. Like that right there, you can realize that somebody's looking at a bigger field of view. And we also know that's the case cuz you see a mouse cursor come off the screen. So, this is actually a window that we're looking at here.

This is a window that somebody's recording. And the mouse cursor comes on the screen. So, we're looking at an unwrapped version of this in the image that I just showed you before, okay? So, we're looking at this super zoomed in version and we see a little airplane here. But, that's actually Malaysian Airlines flight 370. Like the actual missing plane.

We're looking at it. This is military surveillance. This is called Gorgon stare wide area motion imagery. That's why it's like this. Okay. >> [snorts] >> Now, let's go back to this. This is the unwrapped version of it.

So, you can see the plane or you can imagine the plane starting over here in the top, flying through the scene here, and then flying to the right, and then over here on the right, the plane gets zapped out of the sky, and then the person moves the camera over to the right after the plane gets zapped over the sky near these clouds over here on the right. Okay. Take a mental image. >> [snorts] >> Because now here's the cloud photo. And what happens is basically the whole top half of this photo is not even needed.

The whole top half of this photo could be fake. Like as in fake as in none of that exists. So, I don't know. I'm going to flip between the two here. Let's see if this works. Nope.

Okay, hold on. Okay, there we go. I'm going to flip between the two here. Yeah, okay. So, you can see these three clouds right here are the same three clouds right here. And you can see this cloud over here with this cloud line cloud here is the same as this right up here.

This is definitely the same. There's no question it's the same. It's undeniable. Okay, is my screen What's going on here? Okay. Uh I think my video just crashed out again, but hold on.

Uh I think I was tapping too fast. So, anyway, I'm just going to keep comparing this real quick. So, it's undeniable that these two are based off of one another. But, one more thing I want to point out on this, which is very important. Remember, the plane's flying over here to the right, and then they get zapped over here to the right. And the reflection of this plane it it uh the the zap reflects off these clouds. But, wait a minute.

When we come down here on the cloud photo the cloud There is no clouds over here. The cloud should be in the bottom right corner if you're watching this video. There should be a giant cloud set right here. Look at this giant cloud set in the bottom right. This cloud here, this cloud in the middle is this one right down here. In the bottom right corner.

There's a whole missing cloud right here. This whole thing is missing. Look down again. So this photo is the entire scene of the Gorgon stair me all the way down and across. But then when you get to the bottom right the clouds are missing. Now let me zoom it in.

So I'll zoom it I'll do it zoomed in now. So if you're watching the plane you'd watch the plane flying over here flying through here flying across here, but then it gets over here and the clouds are gone. And if I flip it back over I'll zoom it Oh, can I not zoom in on this one? I know what I'll do. One sec. I'm just going to put it into a paint so we can don't have to deal with this.

Way easier to see. Here we go. Okay. So same deal right here. We scroll through here. We go across.

There's our clouds. Now switch over. No clouds there. There's no doubt that's the same cloud right here. Look at this shape. The whole cloud system's missing.

Okay, I'm going to rejoin cuz my video's all messed up. I'll be right back. >> Mhm. >> [clears throat] >> Okay. Woo. We're back. Oh, that was scary, chat. Sorry about that.

Okay, I apologize for the silence there. Uh camera's been freaking out. It's not actually the camera's problem. It's uh some sort of alt tab thing caused my computer freak out and it lost it didn't just didn't realize it was connected to the camera anymore. Anyway, okay, we're back. Apologies.

So, anyway, that is the long and the short of the cloud photo bounty that is currently on the table. And good luck to everybody who's out there. Uh let's move on to the next topic. I had to disconnect one of my second cameras here or my second monitor, too. So, give me a second here. Okay.

Oh, one more thing I wanted to say on this. S- When I was watching Sneezing Monkey, one of these debunkers, everybody's asking him to bring me up. They're saying, "Ashton, call in so that you can talk and debate with him." And he's saying, "No, I don't want to talk to you." And I'm just going, "Isn't this exactly the issue? Isn't this exactly what I talk about every single time?"

As I say that these people want to talk down to me, they want to debunk me, they want to say that I'm a liar, but they don't actually want to talk to me. In fact, he himself said, "Okay, my choice is that you're intentionally making you are making this up." And I'm going, "You have the option to talk to me directly, but instead you're pretending to know what I'm thinking. You're pretending to claim that I'm a liar. And then you wonder, "Why is he getting mad at me?" Because you're a piece of dude.

The videos aren't fake. I get that you don't want to believe that. Everybody understands that you don't want to believe it. We don't give a They're real. How you accept that, how you cope with that, honestly, if you guys go watch the segment, the whole thing was just one big coping mechanism. I almost just felt bad for the guy.

Like he's just trying to come up with ways and rationalize ways where he can just the videos can be fake in his mind. And here's the reality of what you need to know, dude. Cuz he's sitting out there trying to figure out how it can't be NROL-22 that the drone is communicating. Guys, the drone is communicating with a real relay satellite called NROL-22. It says in the bottom left corner of the video. Do you think some random person's going to put NROL-22 in the bottom corner of their video?

It doesn't even make any sense without context. That's the actual real relay satellite that the MQ-9 Reaper drone is communicating with. Have you not watched Ryan Graves' What do you call it? Safe Aerospace podcast? We watched it on my live stream like 2 weeks ago. Go check out the clips.

The guy specifically says he can watch all MQ-9 Reapers. That was their favorite thing to do in the morning. He's a random defense contractor. And he has access to every MQ-9 Reaper. And he can just watch the surveillance he wants to watch. And then like people take clips of like cool that happens and they upload them on some internal server.

And I'm going And And by the way, I didn't know that when I had already figured out this is Gorgon Stare whammy in an MQ-9 Reaper. Just go watch that if you don't understand how the videos are real. It's not a satellite video. It's a Reaper drone and it's a software system that looks like satellite. Anyway, we are going to win. For the people saying that in the chat.

Now, ion pumpy thing, this bad boy right here is a fusion reactor. We suspected it. Where's my Here it is. We suspected it. We thought it. But it now it definitely is, chat.

If you look by where my little face is down here, I'm trapped in this little circle, right next to me is this weird little thing connected to the ion pump. What is this? Well, if you read the words, it says ion seed gas. So, I was looking at this and I'm going, "Hmm, ion seed gas. All this fusion stuff is about fusing ions together." And I thought, the ion seed gas sounds like it could be the fusion fuel.

So, I said, "Hmm, there's some other words on here. What What do these other words say?" Let's zoom in. It says something about mercury or SF6. Right underneath it. So, mercury FF6.

If you ask Grok about this, related to fusion fuel, or really any AI, I guess. Mercury and sulfur hexafluoride, SF6, are fundamentally tied to the economics and production of nuclear fusion fuel. Specifically regarding the breeding and purification of tritium. BOOM, HOW YOU like them apples? OH, Turns out there's a clue right there in those words that proves, no question, this is a fusion reactor. That's not just random chemicals listed on the words on the screen right there.

It also shows intent by the way. It shows intent by the way. It shows that the person that made this wanted us to know this is a fusion reactor. Otherwise, they wouldn't have wrote SF6 and mercury right there. Cuz that's exactly what you mix into your fusion fuel so it breeds tritium so that a fusion process perpetuates. Tritium is the main thing that we need for fusion hydrogen fusion.

While the core fuel primary fusion reactors consist of I hydrogen isotopes deuterium and tritium both mercury and SF6 have entered the fusion conversation due to major breakthroughs in engineering systems that support the fuel cycle. This This could have been its own live stream, guys. This is This is what the live stream was going to be Friday, by the way. This is so huge. The context of these chemicals is that they support fusion breakthroughs. It's not just that they're integral into the fusion process, but they support major breakthroughs in engineering fusion.

Deuterium or uh to fuel a reactor, they need to breed their own tritium. The historic bottleneck in lithium 6 fusion uh So, the modern alchemy has proposed other ways to get to use a lithium breeding blanket. Sulfur hexafluoride grid transmission and plasma diagnostics, not a fuel source, but rather a vital support gas for infrastructure handling of fusion energy. High voltage insulation. Fusion reactors rely on massive high-power electrical components like superconducting magnets and neutral beam injectors. SF6 is widely criticized in electrical energy industry as a premier gaseous dielectric medium.

So, this can quench electrical arcs required to get the massive energy. So, this allows you to build up your cold plasma. Make it so that your cold plasma doesn't explode. I think. But, either way, it's a catalyst. So, there you go, guys. Find General McCaslin.

There's literally just a missing general. And I don't know how the missing general is not the guy that did that. One other detail about that image I just showed you is that those are specific pencils that were used for that. You see all the little coloring? That person isn't a kindergarten teacher. That means that person's a real engineer that drew that.

Doesn't mean they doesn't prove they're General McCaslin, but proves they're a real engineer. And their profile says Air Force 38-year engineer, and they've gone dark since the same exact day General McCaslin did. We got some more nerd for you. But, let me see. Before we do that, we better talk about the Ryan Wood thing. Think I need to grab the clip, honestly, guys.

We need the clip on this one. How wild was it? If you didn't watch the Ryan Wood Hard Truths podcast, in the middle of talking to this guy about uh uh um energy sources and and uh UFO technology actually hiding, he randomly says, "And yeah, I was trying to look for ways to not disrupt this cover-up of this technology." And he's like, "Oh, I thought fusion would be a good way." And he doesn't just say fusion, he says aneutronic fusion. My eyes I you look at my reaction when he says it.

I couldn't believe what he was saying. I I couldn't believe it. The last thing I ever expected anyone in the entire UFO community to the last words in the world I ever expected them to utter is aneutronic fusion. And he did so in a way where he Oh, yeah. Not only is he doing it, he's doing lithium fusion. Nobody is doing lithium fusion.

We've been wondering why no one was doing lithium fusion, and he just starts educating just starts taking me to school. Just starts taking me to school. Okay, so let's go ahead and see if I can find the clip here. So, yeah, Ryan Wood, really cool guy, definitely want to do a follow-up with him. Also, Tim Ventura, guys, buckle up for Tim Ventura interview. 2 hours solid hours.

Could have gone for two more. Definitely going to have to do a follow-up. We didn't even get to all the topics I wanted. That's another really good one. You're going to enjoy that one, too. Tim Ventura has a lot of really good stories and a lot of knowledge.

And I pressed him a little bit on like the cover-up, the Jasons. Actually, Tim Ventura and I have a really good back and forth. There's not a lot of good back and forth that's not like hostile or mean-spirited in the UFO community. And I feel like we don't agree on some of the topic or some of the Let's say some of the not topics, but Mhm. Some of the perspectives on what people are doing, their motivations, et cetera. So, it's interesting to compare and and put those ideas out there.

Okay, I think I found it. Yeah, okay. I think this is it. Yeah, okay, here we go. So funny, man. >> [gasps] >> Here it is. We're going to watch this.

Um by the way, a little Lulu update. Some of y'all been wondering. I can't tell what's going on. I I think that it might just be a sphincter thing. If it's just this one medication I have to give her, we might be in the I mean, if that's all, chat, that's that's great. But, she's doing well, though.

Her energy is good, so. She's chilling right now, right over there. Okay, here we go, guys. Here's the clip. Hard Truths, Ashton Forbes. Credit to um Ashton Forbes and the Hard Truths podcast. Check it out here.

God, this better not crash my video again. Yeah. Of ways where we can get this out. Uh can you guys hear this? You guys can hear this, right? I think I do. >> while also not risking the planet being destroyed. >> Right.

Well, one of the Yeah, one of the things that uh you know, I recognized this um many many years ago, and I decided to put my efforts into um >> Watch my reaction, chat. I'm excited to watch my own reaction. Look how serious Look serious face. >> um anisotropic fusion, basically. I ran a company called um Electric Fusion Systems. Uh I was the CEO for >> [crying] >> I couldn't believe what he was saying. I was like, what is Is he Is he saying there's no way? There's just no way. >> 4 years.

Um and we were working on small-scale roller bag size um fusion devices. >> I'm just at this point, guys. God, I'm going to choke to that. At this point, I I I could not believe what he was saying. I was I was couldn't even process what he was saying. I'm just going, "What How is this real? How is it that Bob would's son Ryan would is like" and I was looking for ways to get this stuff and I'm like, "Oh, A neutronic fusion.

That's the way." I'm sitting here wondering, "How? How did he know? This is like hearing Joseph P. Farrell. This is like hearing Joseph P.

Farrell saying they teleported MH370. You're like, "What? Why? How did he know?" The only reason I know is I read like 30 scientific papers that all lead back to this conclusion these orbs are using A neutronic fusion. And he's just like, "Oh, yeah.

I just It just felt right. A neutronic fusion just felt right." This is like the best evidence, by the way, that like the remote viewing thing is real. That like there's some people have some extrasensory perception that they just tap into and they don't even realize they're tapping into it. Cuz I don't know. I can't explain otherwise how this is real.

Anyway. >> Yeah. Can you talk >> Did you say A neutronic fusion? >> A neutronic. Without neutrons. Yes, A neutronic. >> Yeah, I'm very very very familiar. Okay, continue. Keep going.

I don't >> Um so, I mean as you know, there's 43 companies in the world working on fusion. Um only four of them >> Chat, this is just you have no idea how much I was ready to geek out here. This is that was my please proceed governor moment. Like I was like no no no don't don't let me stop you. Just please tell us all about any tronic fusion cuz that I can't even imagine another guest coming on to my show unless their names like David Curley or Charles Chase or Jay Young Park.

I can't even imagine another person trying to have this conversation with me. >> We're more working on a neutral fusion. >> TriAlpha Energy, Helion, uh Zap Energy, LPP Fusion are the ones I would be thinking about. Go ahead. >> Well, and Electric Fusion which was my company. >> And your company apparently. >> Right. So yeah, it's a proton lithium fusion. >> Can you imagine? You roll up and you're like >> [clears throat] >> yeah, I was working on this thing a neutral fusion. You probably never heard of it. Like nobody know even knows the fusion companies let alone the a neutral fusion companies.

And then I'm like yo yeah, you mean Helion Fusion, Zap Energy, LPP Fusion, you know, TriAlpha Helion. He's probably like oh jeez, okay. Yeah, no. We know them. We know them all chat. >> Um But that's why >> lithium? >> Proton lithium, yeah. Basically we were using um um lithium one >> do lithium fusion. But I thought the downside of proton lithium a neutral fusion this wasn't even live.

This wasn't even live. This is a pre-recorded and I'm still talking to the chat. >> [laughter] >> Cuz I think I just knew the chat would be freaking out at this point. Like holy chat, we found it. Does the plane loaded up with lithium ion batteries? Then they're doing like a fusion bomb to it. Fusion was the energy release is too small. >> No, it's actually it's the opposite.

It's 17.3 MeV. It's it's more than double everybody else. >> Why aren't they why aren't they doing it cuz it's nuclear weapons? >> Uh no, because it's uh widely perceived as being three orders of magnitude harder to implement. Um >> But so is proton boron 11. >> Well, proton boron 11 is is not as bad.

I mean, the what's called the barns uh figure uh the triple product um which is all is a combination of um density, temperature, and duration um that you have to control. >> And let me guess, you did lithium fusion because you realized So, anyway, we got other stuff I want to chat about, but what I was trying to figure out there is are the orbs who do the lithium fusion is there some breakthrough on lithium fusion that they figured out? Because nobody else is doing lithium fusion. This is what I've been suspecting, what I've been wondering.

And I just don't understand enough of it to fully know. It may just not matter. But the last point I said there is I was asking him, "Did you come to this conclusion because of gravity manipulation?" And surprisingly, his answer was no. Because we found with the paper with George Miley, David Froning, and Terrence Barrett, they were already considering using gravity manipulation or reduce the Coulomb barrier or really let's say reduce the input energy to fusion. Which is free energy.

Can you imagine if I get one unit of energy out from fusion and normally it would take one unit of energy in or maybe point nine units of energy in, now it only takes point one unit of energy. Yeah, that's free energy. For all practical purposes, it's free energy. So, but no, he says no. But we know they do have gravity manipulation. We know David Froning is correct. So, the question then is can they do lithium fusion, even though it's three orders of magnitude harder?

Yes, probably. Probably. I think it's literally just nuclear weapons secrets. That's where I think all of this is in some secret level higher than Congress, higher than even what we think of as nuclear weapons, but they've classified it as weapons of mass destruction or whatever they want to call it. Now, I want to talk about a theory that I came up with here connecting a few different themes that we've been researching. This is definitely felony physics, so prepare yourself.

And I feel like I kind of forgot it, so I'm going to use my CliffNotes >> [clears throat] >> so I say it correctly. Because uh it's kind of annoying talking to the AI these days, especially when it's always trying to debunk you nowadays on everything, every post, every time. When all I want to know is if something's going to be feasible, whatchamacallit. Um is this it? This doesn't look right. Uh okay.

So, basically what I was getting at is that we can produce a free energy pump. This is why Salvatore Pai is has suddenly tapped in well, he's always tapped into fusion, but now tapped into this idea that we that's like the sun is pulling energy from the vacuum. Here's an old DOE video. >> What is it? Would you help us understand the fusion process and tell us about some of the research being done? That's a pretty tall order. >> Yes, we realize that. >> Let me see, where to begin.

About 8 minutes ago, the sunlight now entering through our ceiling escaped from the surface of the sun. Primitive man believed the sun to be a huge ball of fire, much like a great chunk of coal, that would eventually burn itself out like a cold cinder in >> Dude, I miss these old videos. Dude, in the beginning just randomly pretending like there's somebody watching him and they're doing a voiceover. I love it. And then full on primitive man. Primitive man thought the sun was a ball of hot fire.

They thought we had 3 days left to live, the universe would end on Sunday. But no, alas, it did not end. It persisted. So, right here, first thing is saying we didn't understand what the sun was before. Why? Because fire runs out.

If I make a torch, that torch runs out in a few minutes. So, how can there be a ball of fire that just never runs out? That was the question. That was why people were worshipping the sun. Because it seemed impossible because it gave life to us. So, we had to come up with a new answer. >> years.

But in the 1920s, astronomers changed all this. They told us that it was nuclear energy that fired the sun and stars. Our sun is really a star, not just an ordinary furnace sending out light and heat, but a huge [music] nuclear furnace that will burn and produce great amounts of radiant [music] energy for millions and millions of years. >> Notice the radiant energy reference. That's a little weird, isn't it? Why are they calling it radiant energy? Why not just call it light?

Heat. They specifically use the words radiant energy. But that's not the truth. I'm now ready to go all in on this. Previously just a theory, crazy one, that that is wrong. That the sun is not simply burning up and doing fusion until all the fusion has uh converted, alchemized into new elements, and then explodes.

And if that were the case, if it was simply just fusion happening, stars wouldn't last nearly as long as they are. You have to realize fusion happens on time scales that are so fast. And yet, the sun is existing for billions of years. I guarantee you they have to come up with some mechanism by which the fusion process is very tightly controlled, so that it can't just be runaway for that to happen. And I'm sure they say, "Oh, well, the gravity is controlling it perfectly." And in a sense, it kind of is.

And in a sense, what's happening in reality is there's a perfect geometry, a perfect balance at play. But it's not a perfect balance. Because if it was entirely a perfect balance, the sun would be a perfect sphere. It would be an absolute perfect sphere. But it's not. We see that there are arcs, coronal discharges, magnetic reconnection events.

This shows that the sun is actually not in equilibrium. What do I mean by that? Equilibrium would be a perfectly spherical ball. Everything's in its location and its spot and it's all lined up exactly. Non-equilibrium means the system is constantly dynamically changing. Constantly dynamically changing and that's why you can get these amplification runaway effects where you'll get a coronal mass discharge or a magnetic reconnection event.

Shoots all this energy away. That's what Salvatore Pais is saying. Here's [clears throat] a clip. >> is our sun. Do you know that our sun has a surface charge, an electrical charge? Even though {quote} "a plasma is neutral by definition." Not so the sun.

The sun has an electrical surface charge. And what is it? It's a ball of plasma. >> Mhm. >> Highly non-linear. I mean, look at the idea of coronal mass ejections. What gives rise to such energy amplification that can result in coronal mass ejections? Of course, locally this exhibits a surface charge.

And remember, there's a spin associated with it. What if it What What if the sun under certain conditions can actually break the Schwinger limit locally? What does that mean? Could the sun, our sun, have another modality of fueling itself, not just by fusion, but by actually extracting energy from the quantum vacuum. >> [music] [music] >> Let's go, baby. Oh my goodness. I love this man.

I don't know who that is he's talking to, but he's definitely not keeping up with my how what my man is putting down right there. I am on the same wavelength as Salvatore Pais, chat. What what words to be able to say those words out loud? Mm. Feels good, chat. Feels right.

Feels like we're winning. No, but what's he saying there? He's saying that the sun is a ball of plasma. It's a non-equilibrium plasma. He's saying there's certain parts of the the mechanisms that are going on in the sun that are breaking the Schwinger limit. What does that mean?

That means it's breaking through the energy density of reality. Breaking through the roof. And if it's doing that, we know what he's saying. He's saying it's tapping into the ether. It's got It's creating a connection to the ether. When you break through the Schwinger limit, you're making a wormhole, chat.

That's what they're doing to the plane. They're breaking through the Schwinger limit. Think about it. You're breaking through the reality. And when you break through reality, you're coupling, you're connecting our reality to the extra dimension, to the ether, the nothingness. So, he's saying that the sun, due to its geometry, is not just a simple fusion reactor.

It's not just what that DOE guy was saying. There's another element. Like, yes, fusion is occurring. But, there's another element to it that it's tapping into another reservoir. In fact, it might be birthing energy into our 3D reality from the ether. Because if you look at it from this perspective, now you'd say the sun is a tap into the ether, into zero point energy, and it's pulling energy out of the ether, shooting it everywhere, the heat.

All the energy is shooting out. That's feeding our reality. So, here's my thought. We're getting smart. We can start becoming a threat. We can start becoming a threat to people.

So, what's the easiest way to be fair, chat? Is just to put it out there on live streams. Let everybody fight over the technology. Here is an Ashton special. Ashton four orbs special. Crap, I might just have to have it summarized. What do I have it say?

Okay. Here we go. >> [sighs] >> So, we can create an infinite energy generator using several technologies that we have, it's hard to say discovered because we just they exist on the internet and we found them, but they're being suppressed technologies. So, number one, we start off with Salvatore Pais's magnetic field amplification. Where Salvatore Pais says in his equation 7 8 9, the B field, the magnetic field can spike, can increase exponentially. And if you press grok on this, it'll say, yes, this is true. The right frequency, if you increase the frequency, hit a resonant frequency, you can spike the magnetic field.

But, the problem is that your system can only maintain so much energy or it's going to explode. And normal conventional metals, any material at all, the more if it gets to a high enough amount of current, it's going to blow up the the actual physical material. Now, let's combine the B field amplification with this superconducting magnetic energy storage device. The superconducting magnetic energy storage device says, you can apply a current to a superconductor, and you can create you can store energy as magnetic fields, which is massless.

So, now you've got massless energy that can in theory, I don't see why it can't be stored up infinitely. And the only holdback the straw back to storing it up infinitely and amplifying it to infinity is the material. So, let's add another aspect. No actual material. Just plasma. Instead of trying to have superconducting magnets and everything going on, what if it's just made out of plasma?

Well, what conventional physics is going to say is that well, it can't just be made out of plasma because plasma can't be self-stabilizing. Plasma will have runaway um instabilities. But, that's another aspect that we just learned, isn't it? Now, let's assume that's also wrong, because it is wrong. Because Bostic and Ken Shoulders showed that plasmoids are stable. They are self-stabilizing.

So, now if we combined all these and we say we're going to take our super high capacitor and then Salvatore Pais recently talking about that we should treat capacitance as the design variable preceding the B field. He's saying, "What creates the B field? The capacitance. How much you can store will determine how much you can make the B field go up." Okay. So, I want my capacitor to be able to go to infinity.

So, in order to do that, I need to get rid of physical materials. It needs to be a plasma-based capacitor. And then you can use a piezoelectric squeezing mechanism. Why? Because think about it. When What is piezoelectricity?

Piezoelectricity is if I squeeze the material, it produces electricity. Why though? Because you're moving and physically moving the positive and negative charges. If I separate positive and negative If I go in and I go, "Uh uh you go You guys you get apart." They're going to come back together. That's why you get electricity.

So, now if we have a ball of plasma and we have some positive charge over here and some minus charge over here, we can just squeeze it. If we squeeze it, it's going to produce electricity. It's going to produce current. And then um apparently there's a theorem that says magnetized plasma cannot be in equilibrium under forces generated by its own currents. Um And then when I pointed out the Bostick's, it says Bostick's plasmoids are peer-reviewed. Plasma guns projecting ionized matter up to 2 to 10 times uh 10 to the 7th cm per second forming toroidal structures shaped by their own magnetic field.

Mhm. Okay. And then the last thing start to finish, here it is. Pi aces exponential flux growth, magnetic field flux growth, superconducting magnetic energy storage, capacitance is the design variable, piezoelectric squeezing, and Puthoff's vacuum extraction through hydrogen. So, the last element, we take all these aspects and we say, "How are we going to interact with the vacuum?" Well, the vacuum itself is feeding every single atom. That means the vacuum is technically feeding the plasma.

Because plasma's made out of atoms. So, that means the plasma's already a natural medium of Hal Puthoff's right. And the reason why atoms are stable in our reality is because they're leaking energy out, but they're also absorbing it in at the exact same rate. Then if we push on these atoms in theory, we can get free energy from the vacuum. We can squeeze on these atoms and pull energy from the vacuum. So, we combine all this together, and what do we get? We get like a plasma sponge.

We get a plasma sponge that when you squeeze it, pulls energy from the vacuum. And here's the best part. What does it charge up? It's charging up its own magnetic field. The last aspect of this >> [snorts] >> is that now if it's a closed system, you still can't do anything. If it's a closed system, all you've created is a balloon with no control.

But because we're tapping into zero-point energy, we can make it an open system. We can say, "We're pulling this energy from the vacuum, and then we're rerouting that to our capacitor, our magnetic field storage, and then we're using that energy to fire a laser or whatever else we have to do to start the process over again." So, now we've created an open system that pulls the energy from the vacuum, uses it to fire a very low input energy laser to start this process up to start this fusion process up, and it just repeats. A perpetual motion machine free energy device.

So, the verdict is yes, theoretically it works. Practically, nobody has built it. The gap between the two is exactly where every free energy claim in history has died. And here's the thing. The mechanism already exists for this in plasma. It's called Taylor relaxation.

A plasma with an injected magnetic helicity spontaneously reorganizes into a force-free state where the current flows parallel to the field. So, Lorentz force vanishes, and the structure holds itself together. Spheromak and reverse field configuration pinches are exactly this. And they form in milliseconds. So, here's the catch. The catch is this is exactly what they're doing at Tri Alpha Energy and Helion Fusion.

The catch is those guys are making ones that last 0.1 seconds or less. We're looking at one that's stable that's in some kind of structure and system that can fly around for a long period of time. Absolutely crazy. Um anything else? Okay. Yeah, that's basically it.

So, I'm not going to rehash all that cuz actually it gets pretty hard. Like these people, the stuff they're building, these orbs, Jarvis orbs as I call them, absolutely incredible marvels of engineering. Marvels of engineering. I mean, think about all of what I just described there. That's like five different technologies they've hooked up together. Fusion reactor nobody thinks exists, zero-point energy pump, the ability to create some sort of wiggler that can make a gravity beam, um being able to do all of this in a drone, being able to do all of this in a size of a drone.

It's a compact fusion reactor the size of a drone. Even if it's 20 ft wide, that's still 10 times smaller than the like smallest fusion reactor that they're building for this right now. So. Wild. Okay, one more thing. Uh let's I should say a couple more things, sorry.

I guess we save the politics for the end, I forgot. I'm not I'm not going to forget about that though. Um Salvatore Pais. I've I couple more. We're going to save all the non-physical stuff at the end now cuz we're on a roll. Now, did I lose this cuz I had to restart?

I had the clips ready to go. But it looks like I might have lost them. So, give me a sec here to pull it back up. >> [snorts] >> Okay, so Salvatore Pais was just on this podcast and I wanted to show you crap >> [snorts] >> another clip. It was Tom Hudson the point of this clip out here. Where is it? Sal Pais where he talks about David Froning.

This was one of the most revealing clips I've seen from Salvatore Pais actually. Here it is. Oh, this isn't the right one. Okay, that's not the right one. Sorry, guys. That was another one I wanted to look at, but that's Tim He was on with Tim Ventura and I haven't had an opportunity to check that out yet.

Here it is. I think this is it. Nope, that's not it either. Huh, okay. Well, sorry, guys. Um >> [snorts] >> Did I really lose it?

Crap. Oh, I think I can just go to my history here. Sorry, one sec. There we go. Uh which one is it? This one?

Here it is. Okay, I found it. And it's right at the spot we wanted. Here you go. >> that we can modify the field or rather the space >> Hold on, I'm thinking I want to go back a minute. >> a rather simple idea and simple is good. Call it the Pais effect the Pais effect. You know, the Pais effect.

Hey, they accuse me of hubris already. What do I have to lose? The bias doctrine is extremely simple. Simple is good. It truly is uh a a another rendition of Occam's razor, only said much better. Simple is good.

So, I told myself based on the results of this paper, is there a way that we can modify the field, or rather the space around our spacecraft, so as to make possible no longer by the need of Newton's third law of motion, namely you throw some matter out of the back, the thing propels forward, but can I alter the medium around the spacecraft itself to result in the propulsion of the spacecraft? >> [laughter] >> Uh uh Are people not able to keep up with this? You don't need a big IQ to keep up with what he just said there.

It says straight up, have this idea. Thank you, Tom. I think it's right after this, right? Appreciate it. He's like, I have this idea, what if we just don't try to propel the spacecraft itself? What if we just try to propel the medium around the spacecraft?

Now go read his patents. Now realize he's unequivocally talking about space-time manipulation. Okay? He's talking about the exact physics. If you read the physics, which I've read, he's talking about everything that I've been revealing. The reason why he name-drops me is because Sal and I Sal and I we don't have any agreement with each other or anything like this.

We just like each other because we both have the same goals, motivations, we understand each other, we have understand the physics the exact same way. It's like two kindred spirits just randomly meeting. That's the best way I can describe it. >> I said, "How could you do it?" And then I read a very important paper, which in my opinion is It came out of nowhere, but it >> This right here. Well, I was listening to this earlier. I'm going He This he's telling us finally where his inspiration came from.

How many times have I asked him "Who's your mentor? Where do you get your inspiration?" And he's always I was my own ideas. It's my own ideas every time. Which it is, of course. I'm not trying to take No one's I mean other people are trying to take credit from Salvatore Pace.

So, I get why he's defensive, but I'm not. But, of course, everybody gets their inspiration from others. And right here he's saying, "I read a paper." What paper you guys think it's going to be? >> It's as if the universe just delivered it to me. The name of the man is Herman David Froneing. He goes by David Froneing.

He's no longer with us. University of Adelaide, among other things. Truly a great man. The idea of a conditioned vacuum, namely that under certain conditions, it may be possible to affect the quantum vacuum macroscopically. So, we talk about macroscopic quantum phenomena here. And what is the great >> Sorry, chat.

I have I think I have like retrograde amnesia. Uh what won the Nobel Prize in physics last year? Um Macroscopic Macroscopic quantum tunneling. Macroscopic quantum tunneling won the Nobel Prize, and people are still trying to say we are making up. I didn't make the Nobel Prize people give the Nobel Prize to the guy who invented macroscopic quantum tunneling for his lifetime achievement, okay? Yes, it is teleportation. >> greatest macroscopic phenomenon of it all.

Remember Phil Anderson? super conductor a super conductor Again, >> Why does he keep saying super conductor? Why is he saying he he keeps saying super conductor? There is no way Salvatore Pais doesn't already know what we have what I just put together. All that that I just put together for you guys based on my own knowledge and just piecing together the the physics that we've been stealing back. We're like Honky Hood. White upper class or upper middle class preppy Robin Hood Honky Hood, chat.

We steal the technologies from the CIA and we give them back to the people that are going to blow up the planet with them. We say, "You You have a free energy device, Mr. Mr. Terrorist, Mr. Jihadist. You who will strap your bomb to yourself and blow us all up, have some free energy." We just give it out cuz we love freedom here, chat. Honky Hood, is what they call me. >> [clears throat] >> So, anyway, Salvatore Pais knows that this must be it. Some kind of fusion reactor zero point energy hybrid that gets energy levels required to manipulate space time.

To break the Schwinger limit. >> And you can see at one of my AI double paper how the things just come together. And then it occurred to me, what is matter? Think, what is matter? Matter, again, use Einstein, use all the greats that came before us to understand more our physics current. And then it became, again, simple is good. Matter is confined energy bound within oscillating fields frozen in a quantum of time. >> MY DUDE.

IS HE saying that matter is just energy trapped in a resonance? Because now, do you know why I love this so much? Again, these are just simple ideas. They're also correct, but they're simple ideas. Because now if we go back and we say, "Okay, wait. Matter, if I imagine an atom now, just this let's just say this little point source here.

Now, this thing is actually a little universe. Now the atom is his own little universe where energy is flowing around inside of it, but the energy is just trapped by its own gravity. Now, everything's physical again. Everything is physical once again. Now, I can say that even the really small things are the same as the really big things. This is huge because right now we can't unify quantum mechanics because we say quantum mechanics works completely differently.

Atoms are like, we don't know. They're like weird. They're we don't get it. It just works differently than the big scale. But now if atoms are little black holes, now we have scale invariance again. Now we don't have to say that atoms are these magical weird things that we can't really understand.

We can say quantum mechanics works exactly the same way as it was in the big on the big scales. Scale invariance. Think carefully. By the way, I see you Bob Green in the chat. >> William, that's deep. Matter is confined energy bound within oscillating fields frozen in a quantum of time. Yes, it sounds almost poetic.

But think what frozen means. It talks to a certain entropy condition. >> Mhm. >> I'll just leave it there. >> He definitely doesn't understand what he's saying. It's all good though. It's all good. We've got some new things to chat with Salvatore Pais on. One more thing.

Uh I'm not going to watch the full interview with Sal and Tim Ventura just yet. But but did I I retweeted it, right? Yeah, I retweeted it. Apparently we got a lot of shout out action. So I kind of want to check it out. Where is it?

Did I save it? Pretty sure I bookmarked it. I didn't bookmark it. Okay, one sec. I retweeted it is what I did. >> [snorts] >> Here we go. Here it is.

Okay, full interview on YouTube. Once again, guys, so my next interview as I already said is going to be with Tim Ventura. It's already been pre-recorded. Really good one. Going to want to check it out. Guys, let's give him a boost cuz his content is really good.

Tim Ventura's content's really good. And let's just between all of us, he puts in more effort than me, guys. He puts in more effort than me. He deserves He deserves a boost. He deserves a bump. And I don't honestly he needs to chill out a little bit. He's putting out more content than I can even absorb at this point.

And that's stuff I need to absorb like this Salvatore Pais interview from 12 hours ago. So, here we go. Going to go check out Yeah, look at all this stuff, man. Oh. Yeah, okay. We need to chat about this.

Okay, one more thing. Laser augmented. I mean it's right in the beginning actually, but I want to I heard I get a shout-out. Oh, look at this. There's a shout-out. Shout-out's coming.

Here we go. >> I forget I think it was Professor Simon that did one that was a couple of mill >> Yeah. >> in the beginning. It It really went viral. He He's a great um He's very good with scientific explanation. Very much alongside just like Ash and Forbes. Speaking of those three orbs that could take that asteroid out of commission. But anyway.

Yeah. So, um >> Apparently, he told somebody He says in this interview that they're talking about his patents. And in his patents, he says that you can use this gravity high-frequency gravity wave device to take an asteroid out. So, apparently, he tells Tim that you use three of them. Why? Uh A big part of this and why the next batch of UFO videos is going to be triangle shapes of UFO orbs is cuz that's how they're pulling off their magic.

You can't do this with just one orb. Think about What are you going to do with just one orb? Make it explode? No. You need to have them interacting with each other. Creating these magnetic fields. That's how they're doing it. That's why we're seeing these orbs in these pattern shapes.

It's not random. It's It's not because they just like triangles. They just Chad, the aliens just really like triangles. So does the US government. That's why they make everything in triangles. No, it's like has physical mechanism behind it.

Okay. This is also really important. I don't know if I harped on this. There was another Ryan Graves podcast where he talks about he talks to a guy that developed fiber lasers. Lasers using fiber optics. And he tells this story about how nobody thought you could get the fiber optic lasers to work because they couldn't reach achieve the energy levels required.

And you say, "Well, what's a fiber optic laser?" It's a laser that you just use electricity. You just use electricity to make this laser and then you get a fiber optic laser. And now you're going, "Wait a minute. Can I combine a few more things here because how much do you want to bet that they're using this fiber optic laser technology in the orbs? We need a laser to be inside these plasma orbs to drive the fusion reactor.

To Oh, excuse me. To ionize the air. But where is it? You don't see a laser beam in there. So, they're creating a virtual laser, a free electron laser, or some other mechanism by which they're using the plasma and the geometry of the plasma to make a some at least quasi-natural laser within the system. And I would bet almost anything that it's some sort of either fiber laser or using the same principles as these fiber lasers.

Because when Ryan Graves is talking to that guy, it goes to show you Ryan Graves knows more than he lets on. I almost guarantee that. He's not a good liar and I think that's why he's desperately avoiding me. Because And why is he interviewing all of these guys that he's talking to? Specifically the MQ-9 Reaper guy. He's Ryan Graves is controlled disclosure.

If you guys don't realize Ryan Graves is controlled disclosure, I don't know what else to tell you. That's what a controlled disclosure rollout plan looks like. He's not like telling you any context. He's just doing these strange interviews where like letting you pick put the pieces together. Very very bizarre stuff. There's nothing nothing wrong with that.

I mean, I say do your thing however you're going to do disclosure. You want to do your spook government controlled disclosure. I wish you the best. I just see right through it. That's all I'm saying. So, let's go to the beginning of this because there's a very odd connection that he brings up and I think he brings it up right in the beginning. >> It is an honor and truly >> those two were incredible articles that you wrote. One on weapon >> about this.

But you you have a disclaimer. Let's get into your disclaimer. >> slides up and >> me put my glasses on since here. Yeah. who can um get much higher combustion rates. >> Okay. Okay. Yeah. Yeah.

Dude. Dude. Okay. We're going to watch this part. I forgot I did watch the first 5 minutes of this and I'm just going First question I have for people, anybody who's a skeptic of Salvatore Pais, I mean. What do you think this guy does?

Do you guys think that like this is just what he does for fun on the side? It just so happens that like the thing he's interested in UFO anti-gravity craft that's just unrelated to the work that he's doing at the Navy as an engineer. That I mean, what do you Exactly what I don't understand how people rationalize this. They understand he's like an active Navy engineer, right? Like there's no way to diminish his credentials.

Literally worked for Space Force, Northrop Grumman, Navy and he's out here showing you engineering ideas and people are like, "No, he's just Oh, this is like what he likes to do for fun." And yet at the same time we're hearing from whistleblowers and what have you that they're really building this. This is of where like I give Eric Weinstein a little bit of credit, like the minimum amount. Where at least he can see that there's a pattern here that's undeniable.

How can you not see these these things coming together and go, "Okay, there's clearly something here and what's really going on is just exactly what it seems." The government is building this kind of crazy Salvatore Pais knows about it. He's got NDAs. He's got to play dumb. He's got to not talk about that, but he can do his own thing. As long as it's technically not connected to the government. Listen closely.

Listen very closely, chat. >> That's right. If if it's okay, let me go right into [snorts] this one. I want to share this one. >> Go ahead. >> Yeah. Yeah, so what what what can you tell me about this?

This is a long time ago, but but what what got you into this? >> Well, I kept on asking myself, is there way uh that you can um get much higher combustion rates in a let just call it a turbo fan propulsion system. >> [music] >> I asked myself if there's a way I can get much higher combustion rates in a turbo fan system. >> [snorts] >> Um chat, what do you mean by that, dog? What do you mean by that? Why are we trying to get higher combustion rates? Oh, we're trying to make a much more powerful engine.

Can you guys not see the connection to fusion here? Increasing the combustion rate is if not exactly the same as at least analogous to increasing the pressure, increasing the energy confinement that we need for fusion. They clearly had to be thinking about that in the back of their minds and may even have to be a variable they have to consider so their engine doesn't explode. At the time when I didn't understand aerospace engineering, I didn't really see the connection. Now I don't know how not to see the connection.

Salvatore Pais is basically saying we were thinking about how to incorporate fusion or whether or not we could incorporate fusion in an engine. He's like this is basically just a fan actually. And you wonder like well what's going on here? What kind of what's our mechanism of energy production? Is it really just a conventional energy machine? And if you read chapter what is it four of this book where he already mentioned David Froning.

This is exactly what those guys are working their scramjet ramjet design. They're all doing the same thing. It's just a long way of saying they were trying to get fusion they were trying to go from conventional propulsion to a fusion reactor propulsion or some kind of hybrid. They're all thinking the same thing. And then the crazy part is they get to these energy levels with fusion then in these reactors in just normal reactor and then engine and they're going wait. What is this actually doing?

Is this breaking through space time? Is this pulling energy out of the vacuum? So this is just a logical conclusion of real physics that exist. That's how these people got here to this. >> Because if you notice this has a bypass area as well. So it's not really a turbojet it's more of a turbofan. But the whole [clears throat] idea is that can you incorporate say a laser augmented optical system possibly powered with fiber optic uh lasers which at the time it was a sensation.

They were just barely introduced or solid state fiber optic cables >> Dude, I just watched the podcast with the guys explaining how he invented fiber optic lasers. Just watch it. Nobody believed it could work. Said the energy levels be too low. And here's Salvatore like I was this this this is this is from 2004. This is patents from 2004 he mentioned.

He said or 2014 I don't know what he said there. So realize how connected with Salvatore Pais have to be to the science and the physics. He had to been on the cutting edge of it. To have been considering incorporating fiber lasers into this. And you say why are they trying to do this? I don't even know what fiber lasers are exactly.

I understand the basic idea but I know what they're trying to do. They're trying to miniaturize it number one. Number two, they're trying to make the source simple electricity. If the energy source is simple electricity it's very easy to create a system by which it produces energy, feeds its own laser, produces energy, feeds its own laser. When you're doing energy conversion you want everything to be the same. Want everything to be running basically off electricity.

I don't want a steam cycle that I have to do. >> Mhm. >> Dude act as um They would generate tremendous electromagnetic energy flux within a confined area and I said, can you get much higher combustion rates by actually using them? That's the whole idea behind this.

Of course that would increase not only thrust but you'd have you could use low amounts of fuel so it would increase the range and other things as well that I I did not comment um there is believe it or >> Other things though as well. >> [music] >> Few things as well that I didn't How long ago did Salvatore Pais know about fusion propulsion? I Guys, I just I don't even want to interview him cuz I'm going to feel bad having to expose him here. I'm going to feel bad cuz this is no question This is This is a bullseye here.

This is a bullseye chat. Not He was already thinking about fusion propulsion, already thinking about how to use that energy to manipulate space time. Now the question is who does Sal favor when it comes to making a gravity beam? Is he a Terrence Barrett guy? Or is he a Tom Bearden scalar physics guy? Or is he somebody else?

That's what I really want to know because we know that you can produce these high energy levels, but there's another element that's missing. If you want to turn it into a gravity beam, something that couples to space time you have to start talking about geometry. Helix pattern number one. Helical pattern and I can't remember what the other one is, but definitely helix pattern for sure. Double uh maybe even double helix like DNA chat. Oh yeah, and Robert Forward, of course.

Robert Forward now. >> But now there's a secret part of this. >> So, what when I don't I don't want to >> There's He even says right there, there's a secret part to this that he can only talk about in a skiff. Okay, well, felony physics. Chat, we don't believe in skiffs. Skiffs aren't real here chat. Have you ever seen a picture of a skiff before? Then how do you know it's real? No. We don't believe in skiffs.

The secret sauce is polarization of that light of the energy in such a way that it turns into a gravity beam. Then you get gravity beam. And now you have free energy and propulsion. And now you've already created your system which incorporates those things and recirculates energy through it and you've got a perpetual motion machine. That's the skiff part of it. Perpetual motion is classified.

Gravity beams, classified. Magical Jarvis orbs, also probably classified, presumably. Okay, let's listen to like one more minute. >> I know the secret part. But but the it So in terms of the laser though, you're using that to increase combustion, right? This is >> Combustion rates. Yes, the combustion rate.

Basically, the temperature within the combustion chamber. >> Yes, combustion rates, chat. The temperature within the combustion chamber is the thing we're trying to increase. Hey, what's the thing we're trying to increase in a fusion reactor? Oh, the temperature within the chamber? The exact same thing? Literally the exact same thing?

Jesus, chat. Oh my goodness. >> Yeah, so you're dumping energy in. I I get what you're doing there. Okay. >> Yeah, you're making a fusion reactor. That's what you're doing. You made a fusion reactor in a little jet engine.

That's what we did. >> You're normal flow, you've got your normal combustion >> well, chat, I'm all in on the fusion reactor, BTW. All in on it. Okay. Let's get to some fun stuff. Let's cool down. Ilhan Omar is a scammer, chat.

Okay, it's it's getting political here. Democrats, start to You're going to get triggered. I'm sorry, you're about to get triggered, but people were saying that I shouldn't talk about politics. They said, "Ashton, please stick to the orbs. Stick to the rivers and the lakes that you used to. Please don't go chasing waterfalls."

And I said, "Screw you. I know politics better than you do." I don't talk about much politics, but when I do, chat, when I do, I have a Dos Equis, I nailed it. We're going to get proof. Let's bring the receipts. Let's go to Ashton's profile, and let's look up Ilhan Omar.

By the way, Ilhan Omar just got raided by Homeland Security or something, and everybody's crashing out about it. And they're going, "This is a political witch hunt. Political witch hunt against the Democrats." I'm going to go ahead in a different direction. I'm making a prediction right now. This is 5D chess.

This is Yu-Gi-Oh! setting his trap card. President Trump, this just I can see them all like lemmings rushing to defend Ilhan Omar. This is one of the sketchiest, if not the sketchiest members of Congress. And if I was a political, I would not be rushing to defend her. The the bust potential, as they say, in this case is very high. The probability that they have hard evidence against her is very high.

Why do I say this? Well, let's go to Ashton Forbes's tweets, shall we, from the last couple of years? I don't talk about much, people, but I can tell a rat when I see one. I can tell a rat when I see one. I'm really good at it. Ilhan Omar coordinating with fraudsters.

Take a look at this one right here. The woman that was just sentenced to the Feeding Our Futures $250 million fraud or $75 million, whatever, a lot of money. The only person that was not Somalian, Amy Bock, was specifically asked about Ilhan Omar. She's the one Ilhan Omar is the one that sponsored this bill that allowed this major scandal, FBI raids, to happen. This is This is not the current incident. We don't know.

Just speculating. Amy Bock explicitly stated in a recent jailhouse interview that she believes Rep. Ilhan Omar was aware of the Feeding Our Futures fraud scheme. The New York Post interview, Bock said, "I struggle to believe that she wouldn't have known." Exactly. Every single person other than this person, there's like 70 defendants, are all Somali. Every single one.

Multiple of them donated to Ilhan Omar, and I'm not talking $25 donation. I'm talking $5,000 donations to Ilhan Omar. Ilhan Omar did campaigns on video in the restaurants that were scamming people. Again, these are factual statements that I'm saying to you, explaining to you how crooked this woman is. On top of this, it was just reported today, which I have not been able to confirm yet, that Ilhan Omar's own sister is directly implicated in one of the restaurants. Okay?

So, don't come at me about how this is a political witch hunt when this is only some of the dirt and sketchiness that if doesn't directly lead back to her, definitely indirectly does. We might not be able to prove it cuz there might not be an exact paper trail for this, but everybody can see when something looks dirty. That's not even all. This article is crazy, dude. This one is from last year. December 27th, 2025.

I read this whole article and I realized Ilhan Omar is even sketchier than what people are making it out to be than what I even thought. Her husband was a fraudster who was sued for running a fake wine business, which is defunct. Let me repeat that again. He started a fake wine business, got sued cuz it was completely defunct, and then he started a venture capitalist firm in 2023, which is only 3 years ago. Whose value, reported value by the company themselves went from $1,000 in assets, money in the bank, $1,000 to 60 billion. You go from managing $1,000 to $60 billion in 3 years?

I'm sorry, but no one's no one's falling for this. How is anyone pretending like this is normal? Even if I somehow got that number wrong, which I don't think I did, I don't remember this is like a year ago. It's venture capital, so it's not like they own that money. They're They're managing people's money. This is actually what makes it even sketchier because the Feeding Our Futures thing needs people to manage this level of money.

This is a criminal enterprise. Those people that were doing the Feeding the Future thing, that was a criminal enterprise. They were paying jurors. They They showed up to a juror with a $100,000 in money in a bag. It's straight-up mafia-level that is going on here. And they need a way to to manage this money, to clean the money.

And this is exactly what you would do hypothetically. I'm not saying this is what's happening, but hypothetically, all these Somali scammers are getting millions and dollars from the government. They're not feeding any children. They need their money to go somewhere. They give it to this guy to invest it in the stock market. That's how you clean the money.

That's literally how this process works, how the fraud works, how the scam works. So, when people come at me and say, "Oh, this is a witch hunt." I say, "I am seeing a lot of witches here." Omar is on video promoting one of the fraud Feeding the Future's restaurants. She took $7,400 on the books from people convicted in the fraud. And again, these were the same people that were paying off the jurors with $100,000.

Absolutely insane. Okay. Not going to harp too much more on that. I'm just going to say anybody defending her, when it turns out that there actually is evidence, and of course there is cuz the judge had to sign off on a warrant for a raid, and they can't do They have to have probable cause. There has to be some evidence. Some It doesn't have to be damning evidence, but has to be some reasonable suspicion that there's They're going to find something in her place.

When it turns out that she actually did some illegal you should find all the people that were jumping on the claim that it was a witch hunt, and you should shatter their credibility. I saw Ro Khanna coming out and saying this is all Glenn Greenwald. Glenn Greenwald is instantly saying that you're not an honest person unless you say that it's a witch hunt against Ilhan Omar.

Dude, you haven't even seen the evidence and you're already claiming that you know anybody anybody who's not believe anybody who thinks that we should prosecute our our look, if prosecuting politicians that are criminals is weaponizing the justice system, then I am 100% for weaponizing the justice system. Cuz that's how it's being presented. You're weaponizing the justice system against your political enemies. Okay, if that's what this is, then I am for weaponizing the justice system. Because criminals in politics I hate the most and I don't care if they have a D or an R next to their name.

They're they're actually so brazen about their corruption that they're not even hiding it. They're just expecting to not have anybody ever try to shine a light on them or to ever charge to hold them accountable for anything. And that's what I hate the most. No accountability. Okay. >> [sighs and gasps] >> Next thing. Is this the last thing? Let me see.

Time to spoil a TV show for you. Below with Josh Hartnett. I just watched this show and I'm so pissed off now that I'm ruining the show for all of you. So, you have like 10 seconds to get the hell out of this chat before it gets ruined for you. You don't even have that long. Here we go.

This show starts off and debates me into thinking that I'm going to get a monster movie, interdimensional horror, possibly some Ringu going on here with like a girl with long hair, you know, maybe doing ghost stuff. And it even debates me even further. I watched the first episode and it's about some weird iceberg that's loaded up to Nova Scotia or something. I don't know, don't care. And there's a monster that's killing people and I'm going this is X-Files. This is my jam.

And bonus, when the monster bites you or whatever it does, it turns you into some kind of zombie too. Where you start having to drink water all the time and I'm going these people are going to turn into squid monsters. This thing's going to turn into a zombie thriller. I'm super excited for this. And so it starts going on and we find out that the monster is a giant squid. The giant It's a monster the giant squid, which as you watch my live streams, you know that squids are equal to aliens.

So now I'm super excited. But it's like I don't even know how to describe it. It's almost like the people that made the show forgot that they were making a show. And just decided they were going to make a different show halfway through. Suddenly halfway through this now suddenly the monster that's killing people is the good guy. Suddenly it's a show about conservation and climate change.

And the brother that owes $60,000 to some gambling debts in the city is going to be killed by people that have found him. But the monster miraculously kills the guy that's going to kill him, which we love, right? But there's two of them and he's also two of the assassins. One of the assassins is a Somali. And he bonds with his Somali assassin. And in the moment in which the monster is about to kill the Somali assassin, he decides to save the Somali assassin's life for no reason other than the fact that he's a Somali.

And from that point forward, everybody just forgets the fact that this dude was about to blow his brains out and is a cold-blooded murderer. And now the Somali guy is just completely accepted as though it's just like he's a normal friend. And I'm just going, "What the actual hell is going on?" And to make matters worse, the zombie virus just resolves itself. People are literally losing their minds trying to drink water, changing their body conditions, and suddenly I actually Guys, you If you watch the show, please tell me I was like kind of paying attention.

I'm not going to pretend like I was paying attention the whole time. Suddenly they're all just cured of the zombie virus. I don't even know if the show explains how. Just like, "Yeah, we just got over it. We just had to get over the shakes." And then also, the Ringu girl, there is a literal Ringu girl with hair coming down that appears out of nowhere that shows up on icebergs that's dripping wet, literally has to be a monster, has to be a ghost of some sort, suddenly just turns into a normal little girl.

I you not. Suddenly she's just a normal girl on an island in love with this dude. She's not a monster anymore. And then that just Peters off. That story just doesn't actually have any resolution. I'm not going to tell you exactly what happens, but there's no resolution, and I'm actually not even sure what happened to the little girl.

I was promised number one, a squid alien monster. Number two, it was implied I was going to get some sort of zombie virus outbreak. And number three, I had a ghost Ringu girl stealing people's souls, and they retconned all of it in the middle of their own show. I'm actually not even sure what the show was about anymore. The ending of the show is Josh Hartnett taking the iceberg back out into the middle of the water so that the monster can just kill more people. Honestly, I don't get it.

There's some weird inversion >> [clears throat] >> in Hollywood now where all the bad guys are good guys and all the good guys are bad guys. The people The military is trying to kill the monster that's murdered like a half a dozen people and it's having babies and having more monster babies and Josh Hartnett's like, "Nah, we got to save this monster. It's just misunderstood." Bro, I mean, morally, the military people have the high ground for sure here. Like, for sure it's not ambiguous. I don't I don't get this.

Okay. So, anyway, I ruined that movie I pray to God or TV show I pray to God they don't make another one cuz that was like six episodes where nothing happened. And the worst part about it is is nothing is happening in these TV shows. It's like the Lantern TV show. From the beginning to the end, there's been no progress in the actual story and if anything, the characters have gotten worse from the beginning. It's not good storytelling.

I'm watching this and I'm just getting pissed off halfway through and it's not because I don't like the characters cuz the characters are making choices that are contradictory. Nothing makes any sense from a logical perspective. Nobody's acting like a normal human being would act. And then you just throw in these scenes where the guy is saving his assassin. The monster is about to kill his assassin and bail him out of all his debt and all his problems. He's like, "I'm going to save you cuz you're Somali and you're you're a minority." What the Okay.

Anyway, chat, hope you enjoyed it. Let's go to the super chats for tonight. Woke Societies, thank you everybody in the pill chat. I hope you guys enjoyed. If you guys have not been following Woke Societies, follow him on his pill chat. He does content very similar to ours.

He'll investigate. He's not afraid of talking about the UFO topic. He talks about politics, talks about the absurdity of politics and what's going on as well. So, check him out. Oh, Rumble chat. Man, Rumble chat, you guys have been cooking.

This This Rumble chat was on fire even before the go live. So, K Sierra, SM Ash Boss, The Dutch Rumbler, Not Yoda, Wild Lurker, all the same fam in the Rumble chat. Thank you guys for holding it down. Thank you guys for making sure that Rumble is out there. I stream on all these platforms because A, I don't need to be exclusive. I want to get the information out there.

And then if information gets deleted, like they delete the live streams, then you can go to what you can go to X, Rumble. I I archive all of them on every platform. So, it's going to be really hard to delete all the live streams at the end of the day. Not impossible. Let's go to the YouTube supers. What do you believe to be the true chain of custody?

Good question. True chain of custody. Edward Lynn. Edward Lynn leaked the videos from the VPU to Wizards. He's the guy. He showed Jenny uh what was her name?

Jenny Chan. I forget what her name is. You can double check, but she's the person that's listed in the case against Edward Lynn. So, what happened was he showed somebody the videos, gave them a copy of the videos, like attached it as an attachment in an email or something like that. They got access to it. They uploaded it on the internet.

They are regicide and on. Now, there could be more people involved in that chain of custody. There's no way I could know. But, Edward Lynn is not regicide and on. And the government, how do I know this? If Edward Lynn was regicide on, they wouldn't have had to do a sting operation on Edward Lynn.

That would have been enough evidence that you can just convict Edward Lynn off that alone. They had to do a sting operation on Edward Lynn because they needed him to admit what he did because there was an indirect leak. They probably had very good evidence that he was the leak, but they needed like absolute proof that's going to hold up in the court of law. Cuz if Edward Lynn comes out and says, "I really didn't leak those videos. I didn't give her those videos. You can't prove it."

They needed some way to get around that. So, that's why they ran a sting operation on him. They got him to admit that he was the one that leaked the videos. Badabing badaboom. So, that's how they got on the internet. And then you and I, we saw them on Reddit.

2023, we see them on Reddit. And this is the best part. People say they're going to say, "Oh, I can't find the cloud photos." There's a $25,000 bounty. You can't don't come at me saying you can't find the cloud photos, okay? We found these random videos that nobody knew existed.

Those are archived on the internet. Going all the way back to May 19th, 2014. They could be older than that. The plane disappeared on March 8th. So, there's like a 6-week window between the first confirmed date we can say the plane the videos were on the internet. The videos could have been on the internet sooner than that.

We just don't have an archive of it. We know they're being archived. This is a random obscure YouTube channel gets archived. But the cloud photos on a a website designed for textures doesn't get archived? Hm. Odd.

Barty welding Sal mentioned he loves flywheels to store energy. Makes me think of the orbs as a magnetic flywheel storing the energy needed for teleportation. And they're storing it where? Storing it as a magnetic field that's ever growing. A growing magnetic field that can grow massively because it's not confined by the material that's producing it. Interesting, huh?

Thank you, Matt. Appreciate you. Jacob Brainard says, "What about piezal or pyroelectric or pyromagnetic plasma? Directly turning heat into magnetic field strength." Could be. And if you look at What is it?

Um thermoelectric generators. There are specific ways to convert heat back into electricity that's that's not just a steam cycle. I wouldn't be surprised if they're incorporating multiple technologies for heat management. They do incorporate that energy cuz you look at these orbs and they're low energy. They're extremely efficient. The energy that they're losing, they're losing intentionally for propulsion.

So, very possible. Good idea, uh Jacob. Good thought. X L X We says, "Now tell them how it lowers the Coulomb barrier." Did exactly. Did exactly.

And people use the same wording to get around it. If you're reducing the energy input to your fusion reaction, that's equivalent to lowering the Coulomb barrier. If you're saying it takes less energy to make fusion happen, that is what lowering the Coulomb barrier is fundamentally. Did your theory explain earlier explain the orbs? I don't remember exactly what that was theory. Oh, was it that theory about the combination?

Yes, because the orbs themselves are mega Gauss generators. So, the orbs are building this magnetic field and as they're building this magnetic field up, they're increasing their Tesla. They're increasing the the uh magnetic field strength. Think about that. So, these orbs, if we have to achieve these huge magnetic fields, this is also a mechanism by which to achieve that. You say, "Oh, it's too to break the Schwinger limit, we need this huge magnetic field."

And we're going, "Well, don't we have a mechanism right here?" Even if we think of it from a conventional perspective, then we can't bring down the Schwinger limit. But we know we can. Okay. Broadway line. Thanks for sharing the future with us, Professor.

Best professor ever. Sorry I'm late for class sometimes. That's okay. You get a pass, chat. See, I'm not the kind of professor that makes you show up on time for class. If you want to come and listen, this is your time.

I'm the kind of professor that says, "You want to show up and listen? Then show up and listen." If you can learn this watching the videos later on, watching the recordings, showing up late, more power to you. It's your time. You spend your time how you find valuable. Thank you very much.

Goku Son. KAMEHAMEHA! [screaming] That's for you. That's for your super sticker. Zapparu, the zaps. My favorite couple. Zaps love to Ash and Lulu.

Best high IQ chat in the ether. Indeed, guys. We're going to be proven correct. Now, what do we have to do? We just have to spread the knowledge far and wide. Talk about the ether.

Talk about these concepts. As you see, we are driving, we are influencing conversations. We are moving the ball forward and making people talk about these concepts. And the more we do that, the quicker this is going to happen. People say, "Haven't you been saying this for years?" Yes.

And years ago I said this is going to take years. I think I estimated 10 to 15. So, if we beat the 10 to 15-year mark, then we're going to be ahead of the game. This is going to be a slow burn, and these people have no intention of revealing it to us. You think they're going to plan on revealing all this technology in the UFO files? No way.

In fact, they might be tailoring the UFO files around us. That seems crazy, but they did attach the Dirds to the UFO files, so not impossible. And then Barty Welden said, "Could Sierra Nevada have planted?" Yes. Sierra Nevada could have planted it. There are several people.

When I say CIA, I just mean the people involved in the operation. The CIA could outsource the planting of the photos to a defense contractor, too. Unfortunately, I don't know exactly what's going on because we can't follow the chain of custody over that. But, I can't say for sure those photos are fake, and I can say for sure that they're from the real photos, if they are if it's a real photo, cuz those are the real clouds in the videos, then it's from the Nicobar Islands on March 8th. It's not from Japan or whatever. >> [laughter] >> So, anyway, tell the debunkers, guys, 25,000.

And when they say the videos have been proven to be fake, you say, "Well, that's weird, because unless you've got a URL for that cloud photo you say that was posted online in 2012, then they can't be proven fake." But, the good news is if you want to prove them fake, Ashton is giving you a way, just logically, an undeniable way to prove that they're the videos are fake. If you can find that cloud image that I just did a whole livestream showing the the similarities and differences, if you can find that image predating the videos, that would prove the videos are fake.

It would prove it because time can't be reversed yet. But, if you can't do that, then you can't say you proved the videos to be fake. And you guys should be very cautious about people that are saying that the videos have been proven fake because they're lying. Videos haven't been proven fake. So, why are they lying to you? Why are they lying to you trying to change your perception, trying to present the evidence in a way that makes you that plays on your emotions?

Do you see me do that? Pretty unusual. Anyway, have a great night everybody. Love you MH370X. Best chat ever, best community ever, and remember we are the only ones fighting for the truth about MH370. Nobody else is fighting for the truth.

There's not even anybody really talking about this missing plane anymore. So, if anybody ever tries to say they were hurting the families, tell them we're not hurting the families. They're the ones by ignoring what happened, ignoring the videos, ignoring that you're the ones hurting the families. You're the ones helping perpetuate a cover-up. We're actually the only people that have humanity left. They're actually still fighting for people that everybody else has given up on.

Remember that. Y'all are the best. Peace out everybody. Later. Love y'all. >> [music] >> Infrared eyes scanning the black, tracking the heat, [music] never turning back. Control 22, a covert gaze. Control 33, in the cosmic maze.

Controls in the mix, secrets untold. Silent watchers, brave [music] and bold. In the shadows, they silently glide, protecting our interests >> [music] >> far and wide. Infrared sentinel of the night, >> [music] >> watching with infrared sight, alerting >> [music] >> us to threats afar, guiding our [music] defenses like a guiding star. In the silence of space, they keep their post. Shields unseen, [music] yet feared the most. With precision and speed, they warn of danger, keeping us safe from the missile's anger. Aspheres, [music] sentinel of the night, watching over with infrared sight, alerting us to threats afar, guiding our defenses [music] like a guiding star.

It evolves in the mix, secrets untold, silent watchers, brave and bold. In the shadows, they silently glide, protecting [music] our interests far and wide. Aspheres, sentinel of the >> [music] >> night, watching over with infrared [music] sight, alerting us to threats afar, guiding our defenses like [music] a guiding star. Aspheres, sentinel [music] of the night, watching over with infrared [music] sight, alerting us to threats [music] afar, guiding our defenses like a guiding star.