Felony Physics Aneutronic Fusion Deep Dive

Breaking [music] news tonight, a Malaysia Airlines flight with 239 people on board, including four Americans, has gone missing. >> Even [music] as these grainy satellite images released today by the Chinese government >> Again, the the Malaysia flight, too, was a was [music] one shot at China saying, "Knock it off." >> Why shoot it down though if it's not hostile? >> Our technologies [music] permit us to manipulate time and space. >> Why the Americans would >> Any distance [music] annihilates. >> This country's very powerful. >> [music] >> Far more powerful than people understand.

We have weaponry that nobody has any idea what it is, and it is the most powerful weapons in the world. Not even close. >> I remember the >> [music] >> line from the Hindu scriptures about the Bhagavad Gita. Vishnu is trying to persuade the prince that >> [music] >> he should do his duty. And to impress him takes on his multi-armed form [music] and he says, "Now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds." >> [music] >> I suppose we've all thought that one way or another. >> [music] >> Ooh wee!

Welcome to the live stream, everybody, and do I have a live stream for you? If you are just checking in, welcome to the Super Jacked Show. >> Ashton Forbes, you know, that super jacked guy. >> The one and only, chat. For the record, I can bench more than Joe Rogan. You say, "At what?" I'd say, "Everything. I can bench more than him at the bar thing.

I can do more than him at the pulley thing. All of them. Easy, chat. Easy." Guys, tonight we got to start with an announcement, and then we're going to do a full deep dive into Aneutronic Fusion. You are going to be the most knowledgeable degenerates on the face of the Earth.

You're going to know more about fusion than PhD fusion experts at top uh Ivy League universities. Now, before we dig into that, I made a post earlier yesterday. There was a specific reason for it. An opportunity has descended from the heavens. One that I don't think anybody expected. One that could, in theory, in principle, prove the MH370 videos are real.

No, I'm not joking. No, I'm not joking, and no, it's not Edward Snowden. It's not Edward Snowden, if you're thinking that. And I'm not going to go into too much details about it. I'm not going to say who it is or anything about them, because they need to stay safe. And they're risking themselves.

And what I'll say is that they know the consequences of what happens if you come out with your real name and start saying anything about the videos being true or even corroborating what I'm saying. That the first thing that's going to happen is that they're going to find out everything about you ever did. They're going to find something to try to discredit you and say that you're a fraud or you're a fake, what have you. And that's already been proven. The reason why I made a vague post saying, what would you do if I could find somebody that could corroborate these videos?

Because I wanted to see the meltdowns. And oh boy, did the did the Redditors did the the debunkers deliver? They're already posting in all capitals. Doesn't matter. Don't listen to anybody that Ash brings on is automatically a fraud. We don't even know who they are yet, but we already know they're a fraud because we've already determined the videos are fake.

So no matter who they talk to, they must be a fraud. I hope you keep that same energy. I hope you keep that same energy. Because the concern for me is only a matter of how do I get more eyeballs on this? How do I get more eyeballs on this? I'm not going to say much more about this.

Also, the person asked that I not speak too much about it. But I'll say it's been something that has been in the making for a long time. And I think they had to get permission from the government to even speak. So this is not a whistleblower. This is not [clears throat] somebody that is coming out and saying, "Hey, I'm going to whistle-blow and damage my country." So I wouldn't expect the secrets to zero point energy.

But this is somebody that wants to help. Somebody that wants to push the ball forward for us. What I'll say is this, to give you a teaser for what's to come. Actually, I'm going to say two more things. One thing is since my concern was about viewership and also credibility. That they're going to they're going to try to attack credibility.

My first thought was I need somebody else there. It can't I mean, we can do it with just me interviewing someone like Anthony Williams, like how we did that, you know, but ideally someone else is in the room when we're talking face-to-face. And this person is going to reveal themselves. Because I want someone to be there to like be able to prove that this is really happening, this is real, this is not some kind of hoax or some kind of scam. And ideally it's somebody who's a third party that has no relation to either of us.

So I'll just tell you guys I already reached out to three people. You can judge my decisions however you harshly you want. The first person I reached out to was that um Ellie crap, I forgot her last [laughter] name. The CNN girl. Ellie Reeves. I reached out to her because I saw her talk to Candace Owens.

She seems like somebody that would never believe any of this and she followed me like a year ago so I thought okay. You know, maybe she'd want to tag along and watch. You can ask her a question. In In return they can make their own little content that's in agreement with the person who I'm speaking to. The second person I reached out to was Bari Weiss. Cuz Bari Weiss follows me and I think she controls CBS.

So you know, it's a It's kind of a long shot but I said, "Hey look, I'm going to talk to this guy. I think he's going to corroborate the videos and at least indirectly. He's going to be very credentialed. Do you want to Do you want to watch?" And then it's going to be the biggest I mean it's the biggest story in the world. Whether or not people understand that right now, I don't know.

And the third person I reached out to was Jesse Michaels. I reached out to Jesse Michaels because I thought, "Hmm, you know, Jesse might be interested in this, I don't know." And in fact I did talk to Jesse. Jesse spoke to me called back right away. But I don't think he's very interested because it's not really going to be a UFO angle. It's going to be the angle of like proving this mystery of the plane, right?

And and potentially what happened, what really happened with that plane that night. Um so in that vein I'll say this. Cuz you guys probably have a lot of questions and I sure did, of course. And I'll tell you the truth is I don't know everything that's going to be said by this person. They've specifically been very careful not to say a lot of stuff. Um but I've heard enough that yeah, so this is this is pretty big.

Now, I'll tell you this, one of the things that I asked was I asked, "Do you recognize the surveillance footage, like the systems?" Right? So I'm not going to tell you how they responded, but we're just going to leave you with that as the as the as the spoiler. The contact being that they saw one of my interviews. How did this happen? They saw one of my interviews and {quote} {unquote} their jaw dropped when they saw it.

And there's some personal let's say let's call it a not necessarily a personal but I'm going to call it a personal connection that they seem to have to the case that is relevant and why they wanted to reach out. So, one of the other things that this taught me also is that there are people out there that know the truth. Everything that I've been revealing, there are people out there that know the truth and literal spooks are watching this show every day. Every day. And I understand why because we're talking about content that most people don't believe is real, that most people don't believe exists.

Can you imagine living in a world where you know 90% of the garbage out there is all just fake slop and you're just looking for is anybody even close to talking about the truth? Quite incredible. So the reason why this gives me heart and the reason why I'm even mentioning this at all and many people may criticize me and say, "Ashton, you probably shouldn't even be talking about this. You're risking this this even happening by discussing it." And I've pretty vague and I think respectful to the person um considering how long this has kind of dragged out.

But I would say I'm not actually afraid of that happening. If anything were to happen at this point, it's even more suspicious and then I'll just start blabbing about everything I think they know about. And number two, um I you know, this is partially at least being approved, you know, by the government. Um and then also, this also means that there are other people out there. This is not the only person.

There's other people out there that know the truth, that know information about this legacy program, if we're go I guess if we're calling it that, secret technology the government's hiding and that they're pretty actively using, I guess, in covert operations without really any care in the world. A lot of you say, "Well, why would they use this on the plane?" That's kind of the crux of the whole situation here. If they weren't so careless to use this technology in a covert operation, we wouldn't have leaked videos of it. So, it's kind of a failure on multiple fronts.

In addition to what you shouldn't really be playing around with this technology at all. Now, I want to segue before we get into the ainintronic fusion stuff. Um but, you know, speaking of that, if you guys have other ideas of people that might be interested in tagging along in this discussion, and I'm just going to be honest, the point is for additional reach and credibility. That's it. Because if somebody's there that has reach and credibility and they're watching this play it out, then the people that are watching the interview now aren't wondering all the time, "Is this like some kind of hoax?

Is this some kind of elaborate scam?" Cuz that's what most people are going to be thinking when we're basically breaking down those videos and everything related to missing plane. It's going to be blowing people's minds. You guys are going to be like, "Holy shit." But think about the normies that are like new to this. They're not going to be able to rationalize what's going on.

Okay. Now, I got to harp on this Jay Stratton thing one more time. I don't really like talking about these woke disclosure people, but Jay Stratton is actually the epitome of woke disclosure. I actually just saw a post by Jeremy Corbell where he's saying, "Jay Stratton is the one that got them to rename UFOs to UAP." He's trying to take credit for that. And I'm going, "You're trying to take credit for that.

You want credit for that. Fair. Okay, I'll give you the credit for that." Jay Stratton, I mean, I think that's the exact kind of disinformation that I'm against. I'm always trying to rename things because that's how you make it impossible for the public to keep up with what the hell you're talking about. Like, why do you have to rename it UAPs? Because now they go underwater.

Bro, UFOs can go underwater. We're not That's not confusing anybody. Okay? Anyway, here he is. And I'm just going to tell you straight-up, these people are not trying to give you disclosure. If anything, this is my most powerful message to the people that are even interested in UFOs.

These people are not trying to give you disclosure the way you think about it. Or you're thinking that the president's going to tell you aliens are real, and then we're going to get some magical technologies and they're going to cure cancer and all that. These people aren't trying to do that, man. That's not their objective. They could do that any day they want. Any day they want, Hal Puthoff could come out and be like, "Yeah, bro, I do all these black projects all the time, and you wouldn't believe the [ __ ] I've been building for the US government.

It's literally alien technology." They could say that anytime they want. They're not doing that cuz they're not trying to expose the government. They're not trying to expose this technology. Here you go. >> In the course of my investigation, I uncovered this deeply hidden program we call the legacy program. It's called the legacy program.

It's comprised of CIA, the Air Force, the Department of Energy, and the defense contractor community. This program has been keeping this secret, this 80-year secret from not only Congress but the president. So, the president is unaware of this this very large effort. And really, this program is in a secret Cold War race to recover and reverse engineer uh hardware uh I'm sorry um craft of non-human origin. So, the the you know, the the the country that wins that race is is the superpower for the next 100 years. So, it's very important.

That's a key reason why I'm coming forward, Chris, because I want to make I you know, stomp up and down as I have over the last 20 years to make sure that the US government is paying attention to this and that that secret is briefed appropriately to Congress and the president so that we can come together as a country and tackle this problem and win. >> Uh [ __ ] Uh [ __ ] How about bro, what the [ __ ] you talking about? You've done zero interviews until like 2 weeks ago. You haven't been stomping your feet at all.

You haven't been saying [ __ ] at all. You didn't even start talking until you released a book. And then you went on all the top shows to sell your book. That's not revealing anything. That's self-enrichment. This happened like 20 years ago, dude.

The AATIP AASOP thing was like 2008. And you're trying to be like, I've been stomping my feet. Dude, you've done nothing. I've done hundreds of live streams and over 100 podcasts trying to get your information out. You know what pisses me off the most? I'm trying to do what this guy's trying to take credit for.

This guy's trying to come out and take credit for what I'm actually trying to do. He's not doing any of that. You're not exposing anybody. Certain who Name one name. Name one name. You found a secret program of the CIA, the the DOE, the defense contractors, >> [laughter] >> and Air Force.

Okay, start naming people then. What are we talking about here? I thought you said you were just 5 seconds ago you said you were trying to expose it. And you've been trying to stomp your feet for 20 years to get people to pay attention to this. Okay, start naming names. No, you're not interested in doing that?

Weird, why not? How come I know that Hal Puthoff is at the top of all of this? How come I know that Hal Puthoff is at the top of all of this? These guys are not trying to disclose this technology. We know they aren't cuz now we've seen the truth. And I am trying to expose literal Air Force surveillance, two MQ-9 Reaper drones controlled by the Air Force that the CIA I'm sure is commissioning that they're using.

One with Gorgon Stare technology, also Air Force specific. We're watching a CIA operation on an airplane that's missing right now, 12 years later. And we're watching fusion plasma orbs spin around the plane, which I don't know, seems like a Department of Energy kind of thing. So, you know what? We're actually the ones exposing this. How come this guy's not talking to us?

How come this guy blocked me? This guy blocked me. I never even interacted with him. And I'm the one exposing the thing he's like trying to He's like larping about. He's like, "I'm I'm going to expose the secret legacy program." [ __ ] you are the legacy program. Until you provide evidence otherwise, you are the legacy program.

And that's going to stick, brother. So, you know what? You want to expose the legacy program, you better start naming some names. You better start telling me something that I don't already know. Tell me something I don't already know about the legacy program. Because this is stuff that UAP Gerb was talking about weeks ago.

You're not even telling us new information. He's like, "Oh, I revealed this secret legacy program." It's like, no, UAP Gerb revealed that on Ross Coulthart like 5 months ago. And you're just repeating it and pretending like you're the one who revealed it. Come on, man. These people, dude.

Okay, time to learn some real physics. Actually, wait. Let me just make sure I don't have anything else we got to look at real quick. Oh, yeah. Here it is. This is the >> [clears throat] >> the post. Look, and here's Jeremy Corbell is such a [ __ ] I'm sorry.

This is just I don't have better words for it. He's just such a [ __ ] He's like, "In 2022, we filmed Jay Stratton's first ever on-camera interview." The guy's trying to claim that he's been stomping his feet for 20 years, but his first ever on-camera interview was in 2022, and they never released it to the public. What? Oh, God. He's just such a a He's like the Ashley Saint Claire of the UFO community.

Just pure attention [ __ ] Just absolutely wants attention. That's it. Stratton was the only person who worked across ASAP, AATIP, and the UAP Task Force. He investigated the Tic Tac. He briefed the highest levels. He helped move the government from UFO to UAP.

When I read this, I just go, "Well, that's the gatekeeper right there." But Jeremy Corbell is trying to play him up like he's a hero. Like the like the opposite. I feel like this is the inverted world. You want to wonder why UFO community has solved nothing and only been more and more obfuscated? This is why.

Because the UFO community here those are pushing like villains as as their main heroes that they think are going to give them the truth. And they're telling nothing. This guy just revealed a book where he said he was going to tell all and he didn't reveal anything. Not a damn thing. He spent pages crying about Steven Greenstreet. Can you imagine if I wrote a book about MH370 and I had like multiple pages bitching about like Mick West in it?

Or like, "Mick West is a dishonest liar and he's such a piece of [ __ ] too." Like I'd be like I wouldn't I could never even think about doing that cuz I just wouldn't care. Like maybe I would post something about the debunks and maybe reference him as being the person who originated the debunks, but I wouldn't bother to like just have personally attack him in the book for no reason. It's just not relevant or necessary. >> [laughter] >> Weird, man. Meanwhile, you know, it's supposed to be a tell-all book. Okay.

Let's get to it. One second. I just want to make sure I didn't miss anything else. Mhm. We're going to look at this, but I kind of want to just get right into the physics. Maybe we have time later.

We'll come back to that. Okay. Now, we have a lot to get into in this physics. So, number one, if you didn't catch up on the last live stream, go watch that. That will give you the basics of nuclear fusion. You're going to need to know that cuz I'm going to kind of skip past some of this stuff.

These papers are very long. I'm going to get to the main points that are important. We are going to review three scientific papers tonight. Yes, not one, not two, not three. Wait, yes, three, actually, three exactly. One, colliding fusion beam reactor.

Probably the thing that's going on in the orbs. And it's referenced in one of these other aneutronic fusion papers we're going to look at. The other two are the aneutronic fusion papers, the DIRDs, Defense Intelligence Reference Documents. So, after watching this live stream, you will be able to say that you have at least indirectly, by osmosis, absorbed the information from the Defense Intelligence Reference Document. Yes, you will be able to say that you are a scientist that has read a scientific paper. A very, very important one, too.

Maybe three. Okay. So, what is fusion? Fusion, as we learned in the last live stream, is we take a pew pew laser, pew pew, and we shoot it at an atom, like a hydrogen atom. Hydrogen atom, very basic atom, has one electron. Sometimes has more than one electron.

Okay. Shooting with a pew pew laser beam or some radio frequency, and the electron will go flying off. Oh, no. And now you're left with a positively charged ion. We call this plasma. When the electron is separated from the ion, we get plasma. So, fusion is inherently connected to plasma.

Because we want two positively charged ions to come together and have a little baby. Okay? And that little baby we're going to abort and turn into some energy. Sorry, I couldn't resist the dark joke, chat. Couldn't resist it. No, just kidding.

So, that's the basis of fusion. Now, the problem with fusion is that these two positively charged ion boys, they repel each other. They don't want to come together. So, people tried to do some trickery. The cold fusion people try to pack the hydrogen inside palladium lattice. That way it gets all squeezed together and then maybe you can force the stuff to fuse, whatever, right?

We have been looking at ways where perhaps the Coulomb barrier can be reduced. Now, we're not going to dig too much into that tonight, but keep that in the back of your mind. Why is that important? Because if we can reduce this repulsion, then the amount of energy we need to make our fusion happen goes way down. And there are two one one variable, one yes, variable that changes, which is our Q factor. The amount of energy out divided by the amount of energy we put in.

That becomes our Q factor. That's the most important number when it comes to fusion. Is are you getting more energy out than you're putting into this bad boy? Because technically, we can do fusion, it just takes a lot of energy to make it happen, and you're not getting out more energy than you're putting in, then what's the point? Then you're not it's not an energy source anymore. The other side of this is, okay, now we can do fusion, but how do we turn that into actual usable, workable energy?

And then the third angle to this is, okay, in a lot of these fusion mechanisms, we got stuff shooting out. We got stuff leaking out. Can we use that leaking out stuff as propulsion? These are the main ideas that we're going to be digging into tonight, and we're going going through essentially all the core fundamental engineering challenges related to them. So, where should we start? Let's start How am I going to do this?

Let me pull these over to a separate URL and I can just share the whole thing here. I want these three and this. Okay. Cool. >> [sighs] >> Let's share this window. I think. This one.

Okay. I think this is going to work. There we go. Sweet. Got all the papers ready to go. Now, if you haven't seen this, apparently we've been going on semi-viral from just posting a a link just posting a link to where you can read the dirts.

Sometimes I'm amazed at how little it requires to go viral on social media. You can just be like, "Hey, here's a whole bunch of alien scientific papers." And people start looking through them and they're like, "Uh traversable wormholes, uh anti-gravity for aerospace." Like, "Yeah, checks out. Story checks out. Concept for extracting energy from the quantum vacuum."

And you can click on any of these and you get a direct PDF link. I don't know whoever did this, amazing. This did not exist like a I don't know, a year ago. This is now the top hit and you can find a direct link to all of them. So, one of the things that I noticed when I was looking at these, thank you for your super chats, we'll get back to these at the end. Appreciate you.

Is it there are two Aneutronic Fusion papers here. You see this one number 30, 49 pages, and then you also see number 37. Okay. Well, now we're going to go through both of them. Okay, so this is number 30. You can see at the top here.

Aneutronic Fusion No number 30. Uh who writes these papers actually? Might have to ask uh AI. Hold on. Let's get a quick answer from the AI. See if we can pull this off.

Ask Arena. Hey, can you find out who the authors are of the Defense Intelligence Reference Documents called Aneutronic Fusion Propulsion? I think there's two of them. Just give me just the names of the authors, please. Okay, here we go. >> Checking the DIRDs authors now. The DIA redacted the names.

Part one lists a single placeholder, AAP person 83. And part two lists three, AAP person 85, 88, and 89. All under FOIA exemption B6. >> Yo, go double-check again. There's a website out there that has the names. They've been revealed. I know they weren't publicly revealed, though.

Okay, let's try again. >> Hunting for the unredacted leak. The official PDFs still show only the redacted codes. Let me pull that Watch the Stars page directly. Digging into forums and archives where people have tried to match those >> We They have them. I have them somewhere myself, so I don't know. We'll see.

Let's see if I can find them. This is weird, huh? >> The DIA's own January 2019 letter listing all 38 DIRD titles names them. Part one, Aneutronic Fusion Propulsion I, is Dr. V. Teofilo at Lockheed Martin. Part two is Dr. W. Colbreath at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas.

The Skinwalkers at the Pentagon book appendix swaps those two, crediting Colbreath to part one. So, the DIA letter is the cleaner source. Teofilo also co-authored the Ultracapacitors DIRD with Golightly, which is a nice thread if you're mapping the Lockheed side of AAWSAP. >> Holy [ __ ] Chad. I know the next paper I'm reading. Wait. Teo Teofilo also co-authored the ultra-capacitors, dude.

Guys, remember what we discovered in the last few weeks when we found out some new CIA technology? Superconducting magnetic energy storage system. How much do you want to bet the ultra-capacitors are going to have a connection to that? Oh my god. I can't wait. Oh, man.

I've never been so excited to read scientific papers. It's like when I used to get excited for a new video game. It's the weirdest feeling. Um so, Lockheed Martin, dude, Teofilo, and Colbreth of University of Nevada are the ones that wrote these scientific papers, in case you're curious. Okay, I'm going to zoom in a little bit. Okay, so the beginning of this, you can see the contents.

We'll go over it. It basically goes over propulsion theory, and then it goes into nuclear rocket design. You can see there's some topics here that are relevant that we're going to look at. Then we can see antimatter propulsion, aneutronic fusion schemes. Aneutronic fusion propulsion projects that currently exist, and then space speculation for the next 30 years. Okay?

So, actually, if you look at those topics, it's not too complicated. We're going to be able to knock this bad boy out pretty quickly. I think the second one I enjoyed more. Now, I'm going to summarize this for you guys. The first few paragraphs are basically just saying that yes, cool, rockets they're sweet, but chemical rockets can never do what fusion can do. That's really all you need to know.

Chemical rockets are pretty cool and all, but fusion rockets are going to be pushing it to the next level, way beyond that. Now, here's the basic math for for chemical rockets, just four equations. And the big problem with chemical rockets is pretty clear. You have to carry all the mass on board. You have to carry the fuel. If you're carrying all this fuel, now you require even more force to lift.

And fusion is much better cuz the fuel is much, much, much lighter. Much less fuel required. Much higher density. Okay. So, that's all you really need to know about chemical rockets. Which honestly is If you understand that, you have to wonder why Elon Musk is trolling.

Why is Elon Musk trolling when he's talking about going to Mars and anything that's not an electric nuclear propulsion? There's no No one's going to Mars and anything that's not either a warp drive or nuclear electric propulsion. Either fusion or some form of advanced small nuclear modular reactor. Specific impulse. Now, you need to understand some math. We're about to learn math, chat.

Prepare yourself. ISP, what does this mean? Specific impulse. Essentially, what we're saying is that your chemical rockets they might be able to push harder. You might be able to get more horsepower out of your chemical rocket. But, it's tortoise and the hare.

It's tortoise and the hare. And when it comes to fusion, yeah, we might only get a small push, but it takes basically no mass relative to your huge push you know, 200 200,000 horsepower rocket engine. Right? So, this is the big difference. And when you actually do the math, what you realize is if you're going any form of long haul, long distance you realize that time is going to catch up to you and the tortoise is going to beat the hare by a lot. The tortoise is going to beat the hare by a lot.

So, that's what ISP means. ISP means the tortoise going to beat the hare and nuclear fusion is the tortoise and chemical rockets are the hare. So, chemical rockets seem better but when you really get to the ISPs the fusion rockets start to blow it away. So, solid rocket ISP 255. Nuclear thermal rocket 850, three times higher. Just a basic ion thruster that shoots electrons out or whatever 3,000.

VASIMR plasma thruster, I believe is what the VASIMR is, 30,000 ISP. So, you start to realize fusion rockets, if you're going any distance speed, it's only nuclear electric propulsion or bust. And probably just fusion or some sort of antimatter or gravity manipulation. That's our only chance. And this now you understand why skeptics. If you don't believe anti-gravity is real, you realize we're trapped on this planet. This is why the Neil deGrasse Tysons, why the Bill Nye the Science Guys, why they've always thought that aliens were fake.

Because they're just doing the basic math here and they're going, we're not getting anywhere. Without warp drives, we're not getting anywhere, bro. Unless you can break out super advanced fusion, which we're going to, which is exactly what we're talking about. And that's what this paper is reviewing. This paper is basically saying, well, what if we had super advanced fusion? Could we do it?

So, here's some rocket equations. I think we can skip through some of these. And then designs. Now, we know rocket designs, that's just old and busted, right? We want to know new hotness. So, let's read a few of the new hotness designs and try to understand what some of these concepts mean.

These are very important. You may say, Ashton, why if this is about aneutronic fusion, why am I reading about ion drives? Why am I reading about photonic propulsion? Because all of this is connected. It's all the power of the atom. Power of an electromagnetic wave.

You start to realize that a lot of these concepts are intertwined. And this is why I say there's no alien physics. The aliens are doing this same exact physics. The same physics of anti-gravity is the same physics for the aliens as for us. They're going to run by the same set of equations. Ours are just a little antiquated.

They haven't quite They haven't quite figured out the unification yet in our equations. But we're pretty close. Ion drives. Ion thruster electrical propulsion provides a convenient and efficient method of generating thrust. A gas that is easily ionized, such as xenon. So now we know xenon is these monoatomic gases. They're easily ionized.

We know what that means. That means the atom we shoot with our pew pew laser, that electron's going flying. Goodbye electron. That means it quite It will turn into a plasma very easily compared to other uh atoms. And this is I mean, to me this is also at least tangentially related to uh nuclear uh physics. Cuz when we look at the power of specific atom, we realize, "Oh, this specific atom is very good if we want to have it become ionized very easily and turned into a plasma." Now go take a look at Salvatore Pais's patents.

What does he say that you should put in the cavity of which one of it? High frequency gravitational wave generator or maybe the Is it the um inertial mass reduction craft? He says use monoatomic gases specifically in the patent. Check it out. So, we ionize the plasma and that's going to be carried for propellant. The voltage difference between the electrode, that's the positive and negative charge, and a metal screen accelerates xenon ions, the positively charged atoms, towards the screen.

And then out the back of the spacecraft. This generates thrust. So, you would say, "Ashton, if this is true, then why don't people do this?" Because currently, if you're not super efficient, the effect is very small. Yes, that affects a lot of thrust, but it's only for a single atom. So, you would need all these atoms to be moving together to be able to pull off something that's going to be a very effect of force that you're going to be able to feel. It's going to be significant.

The specific impulse is 3,000 seconds. It is relatively common for satellites to use ion drives, generating minute forces measured in millinewtons to maintain orbit. Solar energy and radioactive decay are also possible sources of electric power in satellites. In deep space, fusion or fission reactors could provide electrical power. However, once the xenon propellant has been expended, the ion drive is no longer useful. So, the downside of this drive is that once you use up all the propellant, it also is going to be run out.

Now, later on, and I'll just kind of be able to skip past this now, is that they also reference and say a Robert Bussard came up with an interstellar fusion drive. And his way to get around this problem was to suck the hydrogen in from interstellar space. He said, "Use a giant net that funnels the tiny hydrogen atoms that are very diffuse in space, and then you can now get enough that you could use for your fusion reactor." >> Ion drives include VASIMR. VASIMR is a variable specific impulse magnetoplasma rocket designed by Ad Astra in Webster, Texas.

This uses two radio frequency antenna to couple energy to an ionized gas that is used for propulsion in space. When ion drives are often used to help maintain orbit for satellites circling in the Earth, VASIMR's technology has been proposed for use moving payloads through the solar system. The specific impulse is cited as 5,000 seconds compared to 3,300 for typical ion drives. Photonic propulsion. Photons of light infrared radiation or x-rays can produce thrust through basic momentum transfer where momentum of each photon is given by this equation. And photonic propulsion has been explored by the BAE Corporation or YKBAE.

I don't know if this is the same as BAE, probably not. Who holds a patent on photonic laser thruster. These drives generate no contaminants and require a source of electricity to produce photons. Their photonic laser thruster uses an active resonant optical cavity formed between two mirrors on a pair of spacecraft to generate thrust. Photonic drives would be viable on fusion or fission powered spacecraft if their power output were used to generate electrical power that could provide light. Whoa. Hmm.

That's one that definitely I look at that and I read that and I go, so you're saying if I make a fusion reactor and it can produce an x-ray beam I can use that x-ray beam to provide thrust. Cuz it feels like that's exactly what the orbs are doing. Thank you woke societies for the raid my brother. Appreciate you guys. Guys we are here doing a deep dive on a neutronic fusion. If you don't know what a neutronic fusion is, you're going to learn. So resonant cavity between two mirrors.

Just like how the magnetic mirror confinement works. That's how magnetic mirror confinement works. We keep in a fusion reactor you create mirror system so that the the particles get trapped in the field. Radiation shielding. You need to have radiation shielding for astronauts because radioactive particles and cosmic rays and x-rays and all this stuff in outer space are going to blast you. Long story short you don't want to be in outer space.

All these numbers and paragraphs and words in the page here basically say when you're in outer space you're basically just blasting yourself with radiation all the time. And we don't really even know what it does but probably nothing good. Probably nothing good. Woke societies thank you for the can brother. Appreciate you. So stay out of outer space for as long as possible and if we make any kind of spacecraft the thing has to have radiation shielding like the earth does.

Which actually this may be a positive side effect of a fusion reactor like warp drive is that it may also just shield you. And if you can just teleport then you may just teleport past all the x-rays and all that too. Well not x-rays but the radiation. Okay so let's get past all the radiation stuff. Um Now, our subatomic particles. The only thing you really need to understand here, you probably already stand atoms. I basically explained that.

As you can see here, atom, hydrogen is 1 1. That means hydrogen has one uh proton or nuclear uh What is it? Neutron and one electron. Okay? So, the next one is deuterium. What is deuterium?

Deuterium is a form of hydrogen. It's a form of hydrogen. So, different numbers of neutrons determine the different types of isotopes within the same element. So, hydrogen has multiple isotopes with different numbers of neutrons. So, deuterium has two neutrons and one electron. And then tritium will have three neutrons. Cool, right? Okay.

So, now we've learned this. Now we've learned, oh, deuterium and tritium are actually just different versions of hydrogen. Maybe you call them rare versions, whatever you want. Now, one of these is essential, the tritium, in thermonuclear reactions. And you have to breed it. When you say breed it, we basically do alchemy. We do some full metal alchemy to create the chemical that we need, and then we use that to blow [ __ ] up.

Pretty neat, huh? Okay, you want to see the masses of the various particles to understand them? Here they are. Uranium, super damn heavy. Okay. Nuclear fission rockets.

During the Cold War, United States and the USSR developed designs for inter connect intercontinental ballistic missiles to carry nuclear weapons. Conventional rockets used highly reactive chemicals, and as an alternative power source, the use of nuclear fission reactors was explored. Now, this brings us back to that guy on Jesse Michaels Harrington saying that you would you believe if there's a nuclear-powered aircraft in a hangar somewhere? Hm. Project Rover supervised by the Atomic Energy Commission and the Air Force developed specialized fission reactors with hydrogen propellant. A number of nuclear rockets were built and tested at the DOE Nevada Test Site Area 25 in the 1950s.

So wait, we are testing stuff in the Nevada desert? That is using nuclear-powered propulsions? And people are finding seeing UFOs in the exact same spot? I feel like I'm kind of Captain Obvious here where I'm saying UFOs might be nuclear reactors. Okay. Nuclear fission require Nuclear fission reactors require a moderate a moderator to operate.

The moderator slows down neutrons generated by fission and absorbs their energy. Hydrogen is nearly perfect moderator and chosen as the moderator and the propellant in the construction of NERVA under Project Rover. So now you're actually learning about nuclear physics. Which is that if we're making a fission reaction, what you think of as an atomic nuclear reaction, all these neutrons are being released. They cause a chain reaction. We shoot these neutrons out, but now the problem is those are radioactive.

Those are hazardous. You don't want to get hit by neutrons. So they create a blanket of shielding to catch the neutrons. Just like a catcher catches the a baseball. And the And the one of the best blankets, hydrogen. Water. Probably.

And what's going to happen? It's going to heat up, the water is going to heat up. Right? Look at you guys, you're learning. So here you go, here's the rocket design. Now they have a number of problems. The fission of uranium 235 emits 200 MeV's for every nucleus that undergoes fission.

11% of this energy is of the form of neutrinos and is unrecoverable. So number one, this is a lot of energy. Like the most powerful fusion reaction only releases 20 MeV's. This is releasing 200 MeV's. But 11% is gone immediately. Approximately 4.8 MeV shows up as kinetic energy in the two or more neutrons that are created for every fission.

At least one neutron must be absorbed by another U-235 nucleus and cause fission in order for the chain reaction to be sustained. So some amount of the energy has to go into the chain reaction. So you lose a percentage of it automatically, some percentage has to go into the chain reaction. You can see where this is going. We're losing efficiency a bit by bit here. At least one let's see most of the energy goes into the kinetic energy of large fission fragments that are created by the breakup of the U-235 nucleus.

Fission products are highly radioactive and may be ejected out with the rocket exhaust. Neutrons pose a radiation hazard to any human close to the rocket when it operates. In the test of NERVA series of rockets, on at least one occasion, pieces of radioactive material were ejected over a small region of the Nevada test site and had to be manually retrieved. This is the reason why I'm going to push on anybody that talks about a fission rocket or a fission energy source that's powering a vehicle that people are in. This is legit dangerous.

So, either we got to have a million safety protocols in place, or it's can't be that as dangerous as they're making it seem. I'm not trying to present a judgment here. I'll tell you what I believe. I believe that they either have really advanced clean nuclear reactors because they understand zero point energy and therefore they found a way to get around the issue, or they're just doing a neutronic fusion and therefore they don't have an issue there either anymore because now it's just clean.

Cuz otherwise, I don't know how a submarine works where you're in a contained environment next to a an atomic nuclear reactor and more people aren't coming away with radiation sickness. Things go wrong all the time. Even if you do have shielding and even it is supposed to protect it, things go wrong. Okay. Anyway. On the positive side, NERVA rockets were created uh created large amounts of thrust. So, the positive side is they create a whole bunch of energy.

And the energy within the reactor was more than sufficient to send its payload to the desired location in the USSR. This prompted scientists to consider the use of thermal fission reactors for the use of space exploration. Although the persistent problem of radiation exposure to the crew remained unresolved. So, who wants to Who wants to solve the radiation issue? Two classical designs were proposed. In one, a reactor would be constructed as shown and liquid hydrogen propellant would be passed through the reactor to create a supersonic exhaust and to provide thrust. The hydrogen fuel would be located between the reactor and the crew.

So, you could use it as a radiation shield for neutrons. So, this is actually kind of smart is they're like, "Hey, put the reactor in the middle and surround it with water and then have the people on the other side." I still don't want to be on the other side of that. You can see how a drone solves all these problems. Cuz if it's a drone, now we don't even have to worry about this. It's not even an issue anymore. You can design entirely around it.

Now, they would also elongate the spacecraft. Why? Because radiation attenuation drops off by the square of the distance. What does that mean? That means the farther you are away from the reactor, you get much better off. If you're really close to the reactor, it sucks a lot.

But if you step back even a little bit, you get way less radiation. So, you step back over here, and now you're getting like no radiation. So, you really just want to get away from the nuclear reactor. Okay. Now, one point they bring up here, and I'm going to skip past this next part, is they also are talking about using this reactor to produce electricity that can be used for life support on the system. Now, this is equivalent in a drone to taking that energy and using that energy to now, as a command and control structure for the drone.

I bring this up because the orbs in the MH370 almost certainly have to have some control structure inside of there managing the plasma, managing the reactions that are going on. They're using electromagnetic forces in ways and reacting in in in at speeds at which humans couldn't even react. So, what's the solution? Fusion. Fusion is the solution because there are schemes by which you can get rid of the neutron problem entirely. In fact, that is the name of tonight's stream, aneutronic fusion propulsion, because a-neutronic fusion eliminates the neutrons.

So, let's get a learning. Now that we've learned about ion propulsion, now that we've learned about nuclear fission propulsion, it's fusion time. Mhm. So, I already kind of explained the basics, but just like in the stars, when two particles come together, they fuse and then they create a new element, alchemy, [clears throat] and they release energy as well. So, if we figure out, "Okay, here's the chemical reaction, here's what occurs, here's how much energy." We can look at a list of all the chemical reactions, and we can pick and choose like we're at the supermarket.

We're like, "Which fusion do I like the best? Do I want janky-ass deuterium-tritium fusion? No. No, do I look like a poor? No. I'm an internet celebrity. I want proton-boron 11. Even helium-3 is not even up to my high standards anymore. That's why the Redditors are going to go harvest it for no reason, just to punish them, basically. So, here's an example.

Deuterium-tritium 3 releases a neutron and a helium. Look at me, chat. I understand the little characters, boys. Look at this. And 17.6 MeV's. So, one positive side is 17.6 MeV's is a lot.

That's actually a pretty good amount of energy. On the downside, we don't like those neutron boys. Neutron boys are going to hurt. I don't want any hurt. No pain, chat. 17.6 MeV's is split between the kinetic energy of the neutron and the helium nucleus also downside.

Big downside. I told you chat, you guys are going to be smarter than PhD nuclear scientist and I was not joking. Not only do you understand that neutrons equal bad, but you're also going to understand why. Because if you look at this right here, it says that most of that 17.6 keV is in the form of the neutron. So that neutron flying super fast, that's where a lot of the energy is at. But that's not where we want the energy to be at.

We don't want neutrons. Because basically the only way we can get energy out of the neutron is through steam, through heat. We got to basically shoot that neutron in some water and then heat up the water and then that's going to make steam and then we're going to make a turbine. Can you make a compact fusion reactor out of all that? No, that's too much stuff. We don't want all that stuff.

I want I want electricity and I want it my way, chat. This is Burger King. I'm going to have it my way every time. If you put onions on my burger, I'm going to send that [ __ ] back right away. No questions asked. Okay?

That's how fusion rolls, too. Fusion is just like Burger King. We're going to have it our way. So the 14.1 neutron will penetrate far into the shielding because it's got so much energy. So basically deuterium tritium fusion is for stupid people. Basically for dum-dums, chat.

There's people out there thinking they're going to do fusion like this and they just haven't read one single scientific paper. Because you read this and you go, "Okay, there ain't no way. Ain't no way ever this is going to work." So you're going to even do shielding and this is just going to destroy your shielding. The ionized helium nucleus, however, will not go very far. And it's going to dissipate its energy as heat.

There's a novel way to capture the energy from the ionized nucleus, as shown in error reference source not found. Um >> [snorts] [music] >> Um okay. As in in in reference source not found here, I guess. I This must be some scientific paper that was deleted or classified or something like this. I I don't get it. Anyway, a magnetohydrodynamic generator can be used to harness the energy from helium ions and convert it directly into electricity.

Okay, guys, I'm going to be a hundo percent real with you right now. When I read this the first time after I learned how electricity works, just basic question what electricity is, I went this is the alien technology. It's direct energy conversion. All of the energy that we use today, let me be clear. All of the energy we use today is basically a steam cycle. Right now.

All this energy, everything, all steam cycle. They're just talking about like, "Oh, we can just If we do fusion, we can just pull we can just create energy directly." All the energy released, yes, it's coming out as kinetic energy, but we can just like spin it through a magnetic field and we'll absorb that energy. And we'll that'll convert directly into electricity. Okay, why don't we do this? Why aren't we doing this all the time?

What? Now you understand why I mean, once you find out about something like this, it's like, you should just be spamming this all the time uh until people start paying attention. Feels like a pretty It feels like a pretty big story here. Okay. So, we're going to convert directly to electricity, and this is what we're going to call directed energy conversion. So, what do you think the next step is?

If now they realize that, oh, the neutron is is bad, we don't like the neutron, but this helium that also comes along with it, that's good. Helium is good because we can actually use this helium to do directed energy conversion. So, I wonder if there are other fusion reactions that release either the helium with more energy or some kind of alpha particle, or you know, something else. Or is is that an alpha particle? I don't know. Whatever.

The electricity could be used to power an ion drive on a spacecraft or provide power for life support. The one we're most interested in is providing the ion drive. Cuz you're starting to realize now, wait a minute, if we don't even need humans or a life support system, this becomes a lot more practical. Because now you're just saying, all I need is my Q factor, my over unity to be greater than one, and now I can feed energy back into my system, and I can power any number of onboard accessories, communication devices, maybe gravity beams, there you go, super powerful lasers, mind melting devices, discombobulators.

Okay. So, here's a little image. Electrodes on the top and the bottom channel the electrical current. The direction of the magnetic field here, permanent magnets or solenoid on each side of the channel generate the magnetic field, and then the path of the ions tries to go past this magnetic field. The velocity of the ions interacts with the magnetic field and forces positively charged ions to move downward in the channel to an electrode where they impart an electric current. So, if you force the ions down this magnetic field, they drive a current.

We call that current electricity. Pretty cool, right? The ion charge is given as the equation is as E. MHD generators have been proposed for highly efficient generation of electricity from combustion of coal, for example. But on a spacecraft, these MHD generators can generate power from both ions and electrons because they deflect in opposite directions due to the magnetic field. So, our ions are going to deflect in an opposite direction when they hit this magnetic field that you just looked at up here as the electrons.

That's extremely relevant to me because we learned that electricity is just a separation of a positive and minus charge. So, to me, this is basically saying you're generating electricity by shooting your ions and electrons at this magnetic field that's stationary or uh yeah. Even if the ion energy cannot be directly converted to electricity, neutrons or ions can be used to heat up a propellant gas to provide thrust. Hydrogen would be the most efficient propellant for fusion reactors producing neutrons because the neutron energy is easily absorbed through the hydrogen. So, propulsion fusion reactors still generate radiation including neutrons that pose hazards to the crew.

Um here we go. While fusion reactors have the potential for incredible amounts of energy from relatively inexpensive fuel because uh hydrogen is very cheap, the problems of initiating and controlling them are still unresolved. So, how do we initiate and control the fusion reactor? Basically they're saying this is all cool, but nobody's done it. Nobody's done fusion. So, I already told you Coulomb repulsion is the main way by which this fusion does not want to happen. >> [clears throat] >> And essentially says we need pressure and or temperature, which is mimicking gravity in the sun.

So, here's a simple simple understanding for you. Then Tim Ventura was explaining to a very nice lady talking about cold fusion that if we have this very sparse gas of atoms of plasma, you're not going to have a lot of fusion reactions. Cuz all the ions are all separated in this giant area. Let's say that this screen is the area. But if I were able to compress that plasma, squeeze it down to a smaller area, now the same number of atoms are much more likely to fuse because the area where they're confined has moved into a much smaller region.

This is essentially the basic concept of fusion. Why are we trying to what do they call it? Adiabatically compress our plasma? For this exact reason. You're going to get more fusion reactions if you can squeeze your plasma tighter into a smaller and smaller region. The benefit of solid state cold fusion is that metal has a whole bunch of atoms squeezed together.

The density is extremely high. Now, why is this important? Because apparently there's people out there that thinks that you cannot compress plasma. That plasma is incompressible. But if plasma is compressible, now we should really be looking to make a plasma and then squeeze it together. So, this is the basic idea >> [clears throat] >> of the dense plasma focus.

We're trying to create a dense plasma and then create a pinch effect where it squeezes together and we get fusion to happen where we're able to overcome that repulsion. Okay, so I think that skips at least a couple pages. Now, here are some reactions that you're going to want to check out. They have deuterium-tritium reactions and here you're going to see the deuterium-helium-3 reaction. Deuterium-helium-3 reaction releases one proton, 14.7 MeV's, and then one helium. So, as you see here, the helium reaction is a neutronic.

But we're actually going to learn that helium-3 is not completely a neutronic. So, here's a graph of the probabilities of the cross section, which essentially says if you were able to now, keeping the the the the area fixed, if you increase the energy of your plasma, you're also going to get more reactions. But if you look at these these curves, look at this. Notice what happens. They shoot up, but then it plateaus off very quickly. This tells us yes, you can put more energy into it, but really you want to be aiming where these plateaus are starting to curve.

You don't really want to be putting like huge amounts of energy cuz that's a wasted amount of input energy. What you want to find is you want to find the the balance, the supply and demand in economics as we'd say. Where you find the right amount of input energy where you get the right amount of cross-section where you're getting a decent number of fusion reactions, but you don't have to put in a whole bunch of energy. So, that's what this graph means. Okay. So, now hopefully this is starting to come together.

You're starting to realize, "Ah, this is about efficiency. This is about figuring out smart geometric designs of our reactors. This is about understanding electrical engineering. Magnetohydrodynamics." Uh okay. Now, um the problem with this is we need huge temperatures.

If we're just going to say, "Okay, our box is going to be fixed and we're going to increase our plasma here or increase the energy." We need giant temperatures to pull this off. I would argue unrealistic. And now that we've seen some plasma orbs that are probably doing fusion and they're not hot at all, goes that it tells us going based on temperature to try to do fusion is not the right approach. That's not what we should have been doing all along. We should have been looking at the other variables.

The area. Let's compress our plasma down instead of just trying to heat it up. What if we did that? What if we don't worry about making a giant reactor and we just try to make a very, very tiny fusion reaction under specifically a controlled setting. This is all going to come together and I'm going to speed it up a little bit so I don't so I get to everything. Okay.

So, normally gravitational confinement is how the the would do fusion. But, if you're going to do that, you need a planet the size of Jupiter. So, you're not going to get fusion happening in the Earth. It's too small, even though the Earth is giant. Okay? So, gravitational confinement under without some sort of gravity beam is not practical.

Takes too much. Now, notice the Look Look at the similarities to people saying that warp drives aren't possible. Warp drives aren't possible cuz it also requires the mass of Jupiter to bend space-time. Interesting, huh? Magnetic confinement. Deuterium and other ions, they flow along the magnetic flux lines.

So, they've used tokamaks and other design geometric designs with electromagnets to generate a magnetic field that will confine the plasmas. Secondary electromagnets induce electric current to heat the plasma to ignition temperatures. So, you can see this is kind of a janky approach. As they're saying, "Oh, for a tokamak, we can get the geometry that we need, and then we're just going to heat up that area." So, they're not actually even trying to change the pressure of the area in a tokamak. They've completely thrown that variable out.

They've already said our reactor is going to be exactly this size. If I'm doing a plasma doing a fusion reactor, my fusion reactor is going to say, "I don't know how dense do you need the plasma to be?" It's not going to be, "Oh, I'm going to make it this size." >> [clears throat] >> Inertial confinement fusion. This is based on the Teller-Ulam thermonuclear bomb. And the idea here is that you're going to use an atomic bomb and the energy of the atomic bomb to force fusion to happen on the inside. Inertial confinement fusion.

So, the Teller-Ulam device, as I've gone over many times and was leaked to the public in like the '70s, is they put a fusion payload in the middle and they surround it with atomic bombs. And they set up the geometry in such a way where the explosion waves will hit the fusion payload. So, that they get enough energy so the fusion payload will ignite. And yeah, hit fusion. Okay. Other methods can be used to momentarily confine plasma containing deuterons and lithium or tritium to ignite fusion.

For example, instead of lasers, ion beams, electron beams, and conventional explosives could be employed. Several systems based on electron accelerators have also been used. The Farnsworth-Hirsch fusor and the Polywell are examples of two tabletop devices used to demonstrate fusion. Polywell is Robert Bussard's company, the EMC. And the Farnsworth-Hirsch fusor is uh Philo Farnsworth, developer of the television. They're both real.

Another accelerator design, and you look at this, these are particle accelerator fusion reactors. How long ago did I tell you the orbs are a particle accelerator fusion reactors? Because all of these fusion designs use particle acceleration to essentially cause fusion to happen. Instead of just heating it up, they're thinking, "Well, what if we just inject the ions at a high speed? What if we accelerate the ions at the energy levels that are required to overcome the Coulomb barrier, and then we just funnel them into a center point?

And we just have the ions just approach, and then they'll just they'll hit each other and they'll fuse. Yeah. That's how we doing it, baby. Another accelerator is called the dense plasma focus. And we know all about this one. Where a pulsed accelerator drives a magnetic field within a diffuse mixture of deuterium and tritium gas to top to the top of an anode.

When the moving magnetic field reaches the top of the anode, it collapses and generates a magnetic pinch for a fraction of a second that has a high enough temperature to generate fusion in the gas. I think I have a image of this. I I like four of them. Let's see. There you go. Yep.

That's it right there. >> At the heart of the pressure gas filling the space between them. Instabilities first compress the gas into dense filaments. These filaments are little whirlwinds of plasma. The sheet of filaments converges together into a dense pinch or focus, combining all the filaments into one. This filament kinks and twists itself into a tiny dense ball only a few thousandths of an inch across, called the plasmoid. Instability in the plasmoid creates powerful beams in opposite directions.

Positively charged nuclei flow in one direction, and electrons flow in the other. The elec- >> I learned something, too. Remember how she says right here? This creates a beam in both directions, and you're going to use one half of that beam, and you're going to regenerate energy off one half of this beam. In fact, the forward-facing beam of the orbs is probably where they're regenerating the energy from MHD. And that's why you're seeing those dark lines because the particles are being slowed as they're coming out of the front of the orbs.

And they're slowing those particles because that's how MHD generation works. That's how you generate electricity from direct energy conversion. That's why you're seeing the dark lines coming out of the orbs because they're generating MHD from a dual side particle beam that's shooting out of these fusion reactors and the backside is just being used for thrust. Ooh, baby. Chat. CIA right now, chat. Live look at the CIA, hold up.

I've got the clip. Uh Wait. Where is it? Chat, that's the CIA right now, chat. They're freaking out. Uh-oh.

The guaranteed nobody's done this [ __ ] By the way, I'm starting to think Nuno L'Avario was killed over this or some [ __ ] like this. I read all Nuno L'Avario's papers recently. Not maybe all of them, but a few of them. And I mean, I don't know if we killed him or somebody killed him, but like that whole situation just stinks to high hell, man. >> [laughter] >> A dude who's talking about regenerating magnetic fields and magnetic reconnection and all this stuff suddenly getting assassinated out of nowhere. And then the guy that killed him suddenly killing himself before anyone can answer any questions.

Super damn weird, folks. Okay. Back to the task at hand. Yeah, rest in peace Nuno L'ario. Okay. Other options, [clears throat] muon-catalyzed fusion.

I like this This method sensationalized by Steven Jones in 1989. He basically says that this could work, but it's not very practical. He says Sakharov first observed this phenomenon where what is it? Certain crystal shapes tend to hide atoms of hydrogen. Whatever that means. Palladium, platinum, and titanium are the materials that were used most often to demonstrate this. This is actually extremely similar to the versions of cold fusion that uh Pons and Fleischmann did.

But, supposedly, it's not very successful. Cavitation fusion is listed here. Where are my casual cavitation fusion enjoyers? My casual punchy shrimp enjoyers? By the way, punchy shrimp is proof of God. It's true.

In water, vapor bubbles are produced when pressures drop below 2,300 pascals, below atmospheric pressure, through a process called cavitation. When these cavitation bubbles collapse, they produce high temperatures and pressures for a short period of time. Cavitation has been shown to release enough energy to pit ship propeller blades. In addition, heavy water, deuterized water, we now all know what that means, have been used to demonstrate that cavitation can cause particles from fusion. Unfortunately, today, performance of cavitation fusion systems has been low. Now, why would this do fusion?

Well, I just explained to you how fusion works, because cavitation fusion is basically the exact opposite of tokamak fusion. Instead of coming up with a confined space and trying to heat it up, cavitation fusion says, "I'm not going to try to heat up anything at all. All I'm going to do is create a cavity, and then I'm going to let the cavity collapse." And that's essentially the equivalent of making there your space of your fusion reactor get smaller and smaller and smaller and smaller. And what happens when that happens? The air The stuff inside there gets closer, it fuses.

So, it's essentially cavitation is the equivalent of just pushing the plasma on all sides. Mhm. And we've seen this. This This has been This experiment This has been shown. You'd say, "What? This has been shown?

No way." Oh, yes, it has. >> [music] >> Yeah, this spooky music is not doing it for me. There you go. What do you think sonoluminescence is? There it is. And this is why people can't explain sonoluminescence cuz they're not doing normal hot fusion.

They're just creating a cavitation bubble and then light appears. Where's the light coming from? How is there light coming out of a bubble collapsing? People should wonder, right? I love how science proves us right, by the way. It's pretty sweet.

Okay, so there's cavitation bubble. Rocket design using fusion energy. While nuclear fusion releases large amounts of energy for minimum quantities of fuel, and that's the basic idea of ISP, large energy out, minimum amounts of fuel. The initiation of the fusion dictates the design of the system. So, we have to do fusion in a way in which it's going to be naturally confined, or it's going to be confined in a way that will be efficient. Plasma confinement methods that generate charged particles used directly for propulsion, and confinement methods that heat a propellant like liquid hydrogen be ex- uh ejected through a nozzle.

So, a neutronic fusion schemes. Now, here we go. Most of the energy released from fusion schemes are released more than 80% of their energy as neutrons. We don't like these. They're bad. Neutrons bad.

So, here are schemes with different temperature requirements that are a neutronic. Number one, helium three. Helium three. Number two, lithium six. Number three, also lithium six again. Number four, lithium six a third time.

There's three different lithium six. This one's helium lithium six. Then there's helium helium. And then there's lithium seven proton fusion. And then our favorite, proton boron 11 fusion. That's the second one from the bottom.

And then, what's this one? What's N? I don't know. Whatever this last one is. Okay. Is that nickel?

What the hell's N? I don't know. Anyway. Deuterium is readily available by centrifuging water. So, if you put water in a centrifuge, this thing you spin around, just like in a lab, you can actually produce deuterium very easily. Yeah.

It was proton Nigeria 66, chat. I don't even remember. Okay, you get the point. Anyway. Helium three is very rare on Earth. Mostly on the moon.

It says right here, redditors will need to be sent to the moon and live on the moon and a moon mission. Actually, that was classified. I think they just edited that out. That's part of the classified version said, redditors are going to be sent to the moon. Trust me, bro. Okay, so we need the helium three from the moon if we're going to do helium 3, but proton boron 11, look at this.

Boron is readily available on Earth and 80% of naturally occurring boron is boron 11. Don't tell the Redditors we don't even need the helium 3. We could be using boron 11. Don't tell them that though. N is nitrogen. Okay, so nitrogen's an aneutronic fuel. Neat.

Okay. >> [sighs] >> Now the question is how difficult is it? Now this is where we refer to the Lawson criteria to determine how difficult it's going to be, which is going to be how dense is your plasma? Already spoke about that. The temperature, aka the energy, and the energy confinement time. How much can you keep the energy confined? So the Lawson criteria for deuterium tritium, which is the easiest one, is 34.

Uh for the first aneutronic fusion scheme, the easiest one, deuterium helium 3, the Lawson criteria is only .43. So a long story short, it takes a lot more energy to pull off aneutronic fusion. Even the easiest form of aneutronic fusion, which is helium 3, takes way more than uh than just simple DT fusion. And look at the comparison from helium 3, which is at .43, to proton boron 11, which is .1 0.1 0.014. So proton boron 11 is almost 50 times harder than helium 3. Proton boron 11 is a lot harder than helium 3.

And lithium proton fusion is three times harder than boron 11. So, if you want to understand why is uh why is um not try alpha, but helion energy, helion fusion. Why are they trying to do helium 3? Because it's easier than the other two. It makes sense. If you're trying to do aneutronic fusion, you're going to probably start with the easiest one.

Okay. And also tells you the KeV's required. As you can expect, it takes much higher amounts of kinetic um energy for your ions. So, ultimately, when we talk about these ion temperatures, we're talking about the energies of the ions. Now, the way around this is you insert the ions with the energy already. Now, the downside of this is if you're trying to inject an ion, it's positively charged.

What happens if you shoot your positively charged ion in your magnetic field? It's going to fall through the magnetic field. It's going to fall follow the magnetic field, I mean. It's going to be deflected. Now, we just went over that. That's how you direct energy conversion.

So, you actually need your ions to already be inside or you need to have a scheme by which you can get them inside your fusion reactor. Okay. Let's see. Another concern of aneutronic fusion is bremsstrahlung or breaking radiation. This term refers to x-rays emitted as electrons pass through metals or interact with electrons in the outer shell of metal atoms. In order to ignite a fusion reaction, the gases must be heated to the point where they ionize and form the plasma.

Electrons stripped from the ions in the plasma will interact with the walls of the chamber and house the plasma and Bremsstrahlung x-rays will result. Bremsstrahlung is a parasitic process that decreases the temperature of the plasma and reduces the chances of fusion. While the two favored schemes, lithium 6 and boron 11, can generate significant Bremsstrahlung losses, there are techniques proposed using electromagnets to direct both electrons and ions to minimize x-ray production. So, one of those answers which I asked AI yesterday is mirrors. If you use a mirror scheme and keep your electrons and ions trapped, then they're not going to radiate as much.

You're not going to have as many losses. And if you want to use the x-rays for propulsion, which is what we saw for photonic propulsion above, now all you need to do is just direct them. We don't mind if they're losses, we just want to direct them into the direction we want to use for propulsion. Just like you saw with that plasmoid where you saw the beam shooting out. We love axial beams. That's what that means, by the way. When the beams are shooting out opposite direction, that's axial beams. Cuz we can use that for propulsion.

I'm going to skip through the antimatter propulsion. But long story short, if we can do antimatter, antimatter I think is slightly higher slightly better than fusion propulsion. If we could do antimatter propulsion, but we have to produce antimatter to even begin to do antimatter propulsion. So, I'm kind of skipping over this and my feeling on this is that this is going to be somewhat obsolete when we figure out zero-point energy extraction via fusion process. But maybe I'm wrong. Maybe this is more important than I think.

Okay, so let's go through some projects. Cuz there's been several projects, the nuclear pulse propulsion project. General Atomics in the 1950s, maximum specific impulse of 100,000 seconds. Says that this can be built with existing technology. Radiation exposure to the crew and high period of acceleration induced by this system proposes significant problems. So, unfortunately, this one I don't think is a neutronic. So, the project Orion led to project Daedalus, I don't know how you say that, in the '70s.

In this design, they used deuterium lithium 6 or helium 3 pellet would be imploded in the exhaust materials directed by an electromagnetic field to provide thrust. There's also a concept known as Medusa in the '90s. Medusa? Gorgon stare chat? The Gorgon stare the Medusa? Hold on. Hold on.

What? We're going to play the Gorgon stare video for a sec. >> When the ancient Greek [music] Gorgon Medusa stared down upon her enemies, they were frozen in place. Their voices mute. Their bodies turned to stone. In this petrified state, she studied them with a sharper eye. The smallest details revealed.

The story of their lives held still before her. Sierra Nevada >> The Sierra Nevada not proud of their videos. Are they not proud of their system, chat? How come they just let me play this? And they're just like not Don't they appreciate how good their Gorgon stare surveillance is, chat? I know I do.

I know I do, guys. I got another Gorgon Stare video we'll play at the end today. Okay, let's go back to this. The Medusa would carry a large sail. Fusion explosions with sail would basically be used to blow to shoot force into the sail. So, we were going to use a sailboat powered by nuclear explosions.

Seems pretty stupid to me, but you know, people came up with crazy ass ideas. Long shot. Electromagnetic funnel and ICF inertial confinement fusion to power a rocket using lithium deuterium pellets. Travel time to Alpha Centauri was 100 years. So, we had There's actually been proposals whether or not you think they're feasible or not is a different question, I suppose. But, there's been proposals out there to do fusion reactions.

Here's an antimatter catalyzed fusion. This is actually seems kind of similar to zero-point energy catalyzed fusion. This would be a fusion rocket system at a Pennsylvania state employed antimatter to catalyze fission reactions in uranium. 12 kg of uranium is required to generate three critical masses required. This now requires only a few grams of uranium. So, the idea here is to bring down the amount of uranium to produce this reaction.

Magnetized target fusion, plasma guns are used instead of lasers to generate heat in a low-density fusion fuel mixture confined by magnetic fields. What? The fuel is rapidly compressed to ignite fusion. I mean, this could be if if you think MH370 was a was a fusion bomb, then this is like the strongest support you can get. Because if you look at that, you've got three super powerful plasma orbs. They're creating insane magnetic fields around the plane.

And then they're collapsing those magnetic fields directly onto the plane. If there's a fusion payload in that plane, I would expect that fusion payload to detonate. And then this is says it doesn't even have to be a dense gas. It can be a low dense fusion fuel. So if you were like having batteries release this fusion fuel gas as they smoke because you've tampered with the batteries or something, then maybe you could create a fusion bomb out of an airplane.

So I don't rule out that they, you know, annihilated the plane or something in a fusion bomb, but I to me it's only like 1% relative to teleportation. Ion drives. We talked about ion drives. VASIMR engine, highly efficient ion thruster uses RF resonant cavity and xenon gas. Uses direct energy conversion from a neutronic fusion or DT fusion, but loses a lot of the energy to neutrons. Rip.

So this is why I know the orbs are a neutronic. Because most of these setups that we looked through here, they don't work if they're neutronic. They fall apart. They don't give you enough energy. They lose too much of that energy as losses. The only way these orbs can work is if they've solved all these challenges.

And the solving of these challenges is a neutronic fusion. Here's commercial development, EMC2. Prolific designer, Robert Bussard. Based on the electrostatic confinement of the Farnsworth fusor. Dr. Jay Young Park used to work for them. Now he works for Tri Alpha Energy. Okay?

What else do we got? European Space Agency doing something about dynamic gas mirrors. Dynamic gas mirrors. Does that sound like a plasma mirror to you? Does to me. To constrain an ion plasma.

Yep. Rocketdyne Joint Propulsion Laboratory Rocketdyne. Design of an inertial confinement source for manned missions to Mars conducted for this joint project where magnetic thrust chamber was used to minimize minimize contact between the plasma and the walls. So they use a magnetic bubble or a bottle to prevent the plasma from touching the walls. And that's a big part of this. Now better is you have no walls whatsoever in the magnetic field perfectly confines the plasma.

And then the Crossfire fusor, another inertial electrostatic confinement device, also based on Hirsch Farns Hirsch fusor. Okay, is that it? And then what do we need to do for the next 30 years for this paper? Basically, we need a lot of research into these things. Pulsed fission and fusion rockets, a neutronic fusion. Literally just says Robert Bussard.

Just says Robert Bussard. Um and then work on single stage to orbit. When we talk about single stage to orbit, this is the dream for Elon Musk. When we're talking about single stage to orbit, we're saying one craft that's going to take you all the way up to orbit without boosters or anything else. And then you're just going to be in orbit. You got in an airplane, now you're in orbit and the plane flies back down.

That's actually a huge challenge. And that's what's called single stage to orbit. Everything right now is multi-stage rockets. I'm going to skip through some of this cuz we got some more papers to go through, but basically amongst the Aneutronic Fusion technologies, Robert Bussard and his colleagues appear to have the best development proposals. Do you guys want to know which fusion reactor Salvatore Pais references? Robert Bussard.

All nuclear fusion designs rely on ignition of fusion reactions that will consume less energy than is produced by fusion. This is a significant hurdle. And then antimatter may be promising. Okay. Next thing. Actually, let's just look through this real quick.

Do we need anything from here? Um now there's some appendices here. I'm just trying to see if there's any graphs that I needed. Here's a bit bit bit bunch of different ISPs for different reactors. And you see that even the thousands that we were looking at and tens of thousands are nothing compared to how high it can go. The ISPs can reach millions.

So, we can reach super high efficiencies on these reactors. Okay. Let's go to the next paper. Next one is not as long. But this is the second paper. This is the paper that I think I was referencing.

Yes, colliding beam fusion reactor. This is the one that is referencing the colliding beam fusion reactor. Hopefully, we'll find the reference to it further up. This paper is also just called Aneutronic Fusion Propulsion. I don't know how you tell the difference between the two. They're both just called aneutronic.

So, there's actually two previously classified papers about aneutronic fusion propulsion in the DERDs. Crazy to me. Excuse me. Okay. So, this one, if you look at the topics, you see, okay, it's about plasma physics. We're now going to get deep into one of the different types of fusion that you can do, confinement.

Then the fusion propulsion mechanisms. Then the applications, and then recent developments. So, pretty similar. Let's start digging into it. Now, we already know about the concepts of aneutronic fusion propulsion. We already kind of dug into that in the last one. So, let's skip past some of this.

And now we can see here the main reactions for aneutronic fusion, or just actually looks like fusion in general. Advanced fusion fuels down here are going to be your aneutronic fusion fuels. So, we can see deuterium helium 3 releases 18 MeV's. Lithium 6, the first half of the lithium 6 reaction only releases four, but the second half releases 17. So, the total, I think this is right. Lithium 6 ends up releasing a lot.

And then proton boron 11 is 8 MeV's. Okay. Um Now, this I think this is the cross section, basically. Yeah, this is the cross section. Fusion reaction cross section versus temperature. So, just as I showed you guys before, now we're looking at the aneutronic fusion fuels, and we're looking how much do you have to heat it up if you want it to fuse.

And now look at these really different lines. They're not all like the same. You realize they're actually quite different. Some of these drop off. Like it shoots up, and then actually the number of reactions goes down if you keep heating it up. You see that?

So, specifically your deuterium tritium, look at how much it falls off here. Proton boron 11 spikes, and then major drop off. So, actually you start to realize this isn't about just heating it up really hot. This is actually about being a chef. We need to get just the exact right energy levels here to pull this off. Okay.

Okay. And now, I think we reviewed some David Curtley videos about this where he specifically says, "This is where they had to optimize to try to say, 'Hey, if we're going for this temp this fusion fuel, we need to aim for this exact temperature. We need to optimize for that exact temperature.'" Magnetic confinement. This is the most often used for confining the motion of the plasma. So, what I think what we're about to find out is that our fusion reactors are using concepts from all of these. How do you confine the plasma?

Use magnetic confinement. That's why we're looking at a bubble because they're using magnetic confinement to confine the fields in a closed-loop system. There's no way for those things to escape except for along the escape paths that they have engineered for it. The plasma is composed of charged particles, and therefore is affected by electric and magnetic fields. Charged particles spiral along the magnetic field lines with electrons spiraling faster and and smaller radii in opposite directions than their heavier ion counterparts. So, this is why we see the beams in different directions.

As the magnetic field increases at the ends of the magnetic mirror, the particles will reverse directions along the field lines and become trapped. This is why magnetic mirrors are so important when it comes to fusion. Cuz we trap our particles. So, the advantage >> [clears throat] >> of an approach where the plasma pressure is balanced is that the imposed magnetic field prevents much of the plasma from leaking or from coming in contact with the structural elements of the chamber chambers well. So, the plasma is not going to actually interact with the chamber and destroy it. Okay.

So, here you go. Take a look at this beautiful image that we've got here. Look at that bad boy. Now, when you see those particle beams, those black lines, doesn't it look like kind of spirally? If that is the case, the reason why it looks patchy when you see these dark lines coming out of the orbs is cuz these are particles that are spiraling through magnetic fields. A second related magnetic method is to join the ends of a solenoid, a long cylindrical tube, together as a toroid into a donut and have the plasma confined to a ring.

A simple toroid provides poor confinement because the radial gradient of the magnetic field strength results in plasma drift. So, a normal tokamak sucks because the plasma drifts. It doesn't want to stay in a perfect ring. A method to reduce the drift and produce a stable plasma equilibrium is to superimpose a poloidal magnetic field with the toroidal field. Thus driving current through the plasma itself. This is exactly what we looked at in the action lab on our last live stream.

We saw that if you take your donut and you drive a magnetic field right through the middle of it you will then drive a current that then creates our plasma ring. Okay. This is the idea of a tokamak. What is a spheromak? I'm just trying to see if there's anything else I need to hit here. A spheromak is a tokamak in a spherical chamber that uses only a single set of coils in conjunction with plasma currents that self-generate a confining magnetic field.

However, this design is thought to be less promising than the previously described technologies for generating significant fusion energy. A field-reversed configuration secret word of the day field-reversed configuration woo there it is. Is an elongated plasma ellipsoid conducting an azimuthal current that reverses direction of an externally applied magnetic field. The resultant field provides toroidal plasma confinement without requiring a toroidal vacuum vessel or even a coil set. It has the potential of achieving much higher stable plasma configurations in much smaller volumes using supplementary laser or neutral beam heating from the ends.

So the FRC He much higher potential to be much smaller and you would heat it up through injecting things through the ends. So, if you're looking back at your poly your planet-shaped field here, you would inject the particles through the top or through the bottom. Do you know what that's similar to? That's air-breathing magnetohydrodynamics. That's what air-breathing magnetohydrodynamics is. Is that you're ionizing the air and letting the particles shoot in through the open spot.

That's why we see the black lines in the orbs. I think what they've done is they've replaced the ion beam injectors with air-breathing setup where they just ionize the air and use that instead. Inertial confinement and we kind of went through some of these. I think I'm going to skip inertial confinement. If we just compress down pressure like I said with the Telon Uller, so a lot of this is a little bit redundant, but there's some other stuff that is unique in here that I want to go through. And electrostatic confinement IEC inertial electrostatic confinement as we said is like Robert Bussard.

So, what are we doing in this situation? We are trying to use electric or electrostatic fields and they're going to create a virtual cathode comprised of electrons. What does that mean? That means if we put a bunch of negatively charged electrons and cluster them up together, then positively charged ions are going to be attracted to them because collectively they make a very powerful negative charge. So, the basic idea of the Bussard inertial electrostatic confinement is let's make a very negatively charged center core and then all the ions will accelerate towards it. That's it.

Very simple. >> [clears throat] >> Um there's some issues that it brings up here though. It says a difficulty is that some of the plasmas interact directly with the cathode contaminating the plasma with ions. A method for mitigating this problem is to eliminate the cathode grid and instead use magnetic fields to create a virtual cathode comprised of electrons. Such devices include polywell and the Penning trap. One such Penning trap design developed at Los Alamos injects electrons into the central region in such a matter as to produce harmonic oscillator potential. What?

Whenever I hear harmonic oscillator, I immediately think space-time manipulation. Harmonic oscillator is always the core foundation of gravity manipulation beams. Go watch any Garry Stevenson, Dave Rossi, all the dudes talking about harmonic oscillators. Now, what is this oscillator going to do? Called a periodically oscillating plasmasphere, ions in this chamber also then undergo harmonic oscillations and can become phase-locked with the use of an externally applied radio frequency field. Bro. Bro.

Ion pumpy thing chat. Ion pumpy thing. They're shooting that the particles into the magnetic fields that phase-lock them and now the ions are literally trapped like they're on a a They're just straight up trapped like they're on a freeway. That's what they're doing. And then you can manipulate them, too. You want to change their phase, twist them around, turn them into a gravity beam?

Easy-peasy. Okay. This allows the ions to reach very high densities and temperatures as they collide at the center of the chamber. This is how they're doing controlled thermonuclear fusion. You phase lock the ions, so now they all get trapped in a beam, and then you just beam the beams together. Shoot the beams together.

And now you're just doing fusion, and you're not heating [ __ ] up, you just phase lock them. This promising design eliminates any power losses due to Coulomb collisions and substantially increases the efficiency of fusion power generation. Now you see why everybody is freaking out about Robert Bussard or talking about them or referencing Robert Bussard. You think about this, you go, this is the This is the move. This is what you do. Why are we not doing this?

Why is all our research into fusion not this? This just logically makes so much more sense than a tokamak. And then I guarantee if you talk to people like this, you're going to They're going to go full Westworld. They're going to go full it doesn't look like anything to me. I don't know what this is. You know, maybe it's cool they should have invested in it.

Like they're going to give you all the NPC excuses. So, magneto inertial confinement fusion is similar to IEC or uh yeah, inertial confinement fusion ICF, but also uses a magnetic field, strong magnetic field with a conducting shell. As the shell's imploded the magnetic intensity increases dramatically constraining the heating in the plasma and facilitating fusion. This concept is being pursued in the United States by the Office of Fusion Energy Sciences of the Department of Energy. Woah. Honestly, I can't even tell what kind of fusion the orbs are doing, man.

I'm pretty sure it's IEC fusion, but there are a lot of fusions that are very similar that are all using electromagnetic fields. This one's also really promising cuz this is straight-up Department of Energy was researching this. And this seems to be very similar to using a collapsing magnetic field. Using magnetic field confinement to lower the fusion ignition requirements for implosion. Okay. High gain MIF is heating power directed into a hot spot for fusion ignition must be greater than the rate of energy loss.

High implosion velocity is needed for high fusion yield. However, a high implosion velocity actually lowers the efficiency of fusion. Since less of the cold fuel is assembled. Huh. So, you don't necessarily just want to jam things fast together really fast. That's not going to be the best way to do fusion, either. So, that's what that tells us.

Low to intermediate fusion, electromagnetic pulsed power can be substituted for lasers. Okay, who just said this in the chat? Someone said pow pulsed power in the chat. Gold star for you today. Particle beams. So, you can use pulsed electromagnetic current instead of laser beams. A low implosion velocity implies that a larger shell can be used leading to a longer burn duration and much slower density target. It's thought by using an implo- imposed magnetic field, a solid or liquid shell liner, and gaseous target can be used rather than usual cryogenic solid fuel pellets.

Such is the case of magnetic magnetized target fusion experiment performed at LANL. This is why I guys, how are they doing all this research but there's nothing that comes out to the public? There's zero public research knowledge about fusion here that is coming out of these DOE labs. And then a similar pulse compression of a fusion fuel gas can be achieved without a target at all using a dense plasma focus. So you don't even need to have a fusion target. A lot of the fusion targets we think of them shooting a laser at a pellet.

And this is going now we don't even need that. Instead we have annular electrodes and we just saw the dense plasma focus the capacitor bank is discharged driving the nanosecond pulse that heats the plasma to create those ignition temperatures that we saw. And it says this is by far the simplest and least elaborate magnetic confinement to achieve a neutronic fusion ignition. People should just read the pages. Dense plasma focus is the simplest easiest method to achieve a neutronic fusion. How could someone say that unless they just knew?

Look at this bad boy. This looks like something straight out of Star Trek. Compressed thermonuclear conditions preheated fuel plasma injector. You realize this can just be inside the orbs. This isn't complicated. Okay, now we can use fusion reactors for propulsion.

They've been seriously studied since the 1960s. I've been read a lot of the different types. But all such studies abandoned the use of deuterium tritium because of the heavy shielding requirement for the neutrons and the complexity of needing to breed tritium. So, you can't do fusion propulsion with neutronic fusion. Just not feasible. So, when we see fusion reactors flying around in the sky, they have to be a neutronic fusion.

They have to be super advanced. Only deuterium-tritium deuterium 3 and proton-boron 11 Sorry, only helium 3 and proton-boron 11 fuels have been considered because of the high specific powers achievable for air and space flight. So, now you can narrow down even more because only these two fusion fuels achieve enough power density that we need for space flight. So, it's got to be helium 3 or it's got to be proton-boron 11. Now, here was the major of you look at this. You guys just went through this whole paper with me.

And suddenly there's a U right here. This means they edited out a classified portion of this paper. There was a part here that said C or one of the other classifications. I think it's like S secret classified secret and unclassified. U, S, and C I think are the letters. And they use those letters specifically so that when they reveal something to the public, they just edit out all the S's, all the C's, and then they just reveal it.

That's how I know for sure 100% there's a classified portion of this that's not been revealed yet. In the field-reversed [snorts] configuration section. Okay, in the seminal study on fusion propulsion performed in 1993, it reviews studies of a generic cylindrical fusion plasma model for analyzing the specific power for systems using deuterium-helium 3. The estimated gross mass of this reactor was 112 What is this? I don't know what these numbers are. Anyway, it's kind of heavy.

Optimization of this concept design using the FRC plasma Excuse me. Plasma confinement using colliding beams has led to much more compact configuration of 33 MGs. What is this? Is this tons or something? Producing 100 MW. So, this right here talking about the improvements of this FRC.

This is our last paper that we're going to look at. That reference right there, reference number 11. That is the colliding beam paper. I was reading this and I'm going, wait, where's the reference number 11? And I find out it's right here in the unclassified field reverse configuration portion. Hm.

I don't think that's mega Gauss refers to the Tesla of the magnetic field strength, I believe. Okay. So, the size of this one's still pretty big, 7 m by 1 m. So, still too big for our orbs, but you can see how they could have made it much smaller. Now, what I found really interesting about this, and you can see that they're they're already incorporating making this more and more efficient here. Take a look at this.

This is the field reverse configuration design. Colliding beam fusion reactor. This is the actual design. Look at how similar this is to the ion pumpy thing. I might have to pull them up side by side here. You look at this and you guys magnetic separatrix.

The only difference is that the field reverse configuration should have two hotspots in it. Field reverse configuration has two hotspots because it's called a magnetic separatrix, meaning that there's basically two different magnetic fields going on in the same plasma bubble. There's a plasma bubble inside of the plasma bubble. Ours only seems to show one. Also, you can see the thrust plasma. This is a linear reactor, meaning it is like a line and stuff gets shot out the end.

We can see there's a magnetic field reverse core. We have a magnetic nozzle, the ion injector at the bottom. Look at the ion injector at the bottom. Looks just like the ion pumpy thing that he had a little injector for ions. And now I'm thinking that's the ion beam injector. That's where they're injecting the energetic ions.

Remember, to make this fusion reactor work, you want to inject the ions with high energies. And then just shoot them towards the middle. Directed energy converter, that's where they're extracting via MHD. They're extracting the charged particles, the energy the kinetic energy from the charged particles. Crazy. Dense plasma focus reactors operate at extremely high plasma pressure.

So, look at this. The secret to the DPF is the plasma pressure, not the temperature. The pressure. This is what we should have been focused on, not focused on the temperature. We should have been focused on the pressure. Just like the ion pumpy thing is focused on the pressure of the plasma chamber.

A parametric analysis by Sean Nett has shown that the system of 16 to 24 mg can produce 400 to 900 MW of power and thrust to 500 to 1,000 kN. So, big numbers. Big numbers good. This system is continually fueled by hydrogen and boron gas. So, in theory, if you just insert some boron gas, you might be able to use the hydrogen from the air or the water. You just do that centrifugal thing and you separate the deuterium from the oxygen in the water and you that's your fuel.

And now, you don't all you need to keep on board is a tiny amount of boron 11 as your catalyst for your reaction. That's it. The electrodes are pulsed at 10 Hz or higher with the 100 keV plasma fusion products and unfused fuel expelled to provide thrust. After passing through a direct energy converter cooled by a separate H2 coolant system that is also expelled in the plasma stream. Come on, bro. Tell me the orbs aren't this. How can the orbs not be this?

Realize I didn't go back in time yet and teleport and and and write this paper. So, how can this be here? How can this exist? Magnetic inertial confinement. Plasmoids using field reverse configuration. So, this is just an extension upon plasmoid field reverse configurations.

This is what I'm saying is that like even the FRCs are using the magneto inertial confinement methods. High-density compressed plasmoid is formed by a staged axial and radial compression of two merging FRCs. This is exactly what Tri Alpha and Helium were doing. Shooting plasmoids at each other and then having them merge. Where the energy that is required for the implosion compression and heating of the magnetized target plasmoid is stored in the kinetic energy. So that the kinetic energy they used to shoot it is what's being used to create the fusion.

Crazy, huh? And this is saying that if we do this, we might be able to create much smaller reactors. This looks like this was classified or something. Or I don't know why the burn chamber has like these huge black marks over it, but I think they marked that for classification. And again, I'm telling you like why is all this classified? I keep telling you they've classified and hidden fusion and then I keep finding papers where it just proves they've classified and hidden it.

And people are like, "No, you're just guessing." Air propulsion. Hello. Okay. So Um let's see. What do we want?

The assistance of conventional rocket technology plus air-breathing magnetohydrodynamic assisted propulsion to augment a neutronic fusion plasma propulsion has been studied and depicted. This is Paul Sizz's David Froning's thing. This is the NASP. Like this this exact image is in this book. Isn't this on just chapter four? I'm pretty sure this is just chapter four, chat.

Hold on. Yeah, there it is right there. Look how fast I found this. This book has 200-300 pages in it, chat. I just found the exact image used in this DERD and it only took me 5 seconds. Exact image.

Like exact image because it's literally referencing this guy that I just showed you his book. Okay. So anyway, it uses a combined system. We've reviewed this quite a bit. The air-breathing system that we use to pull the hydrogen in. That's all you need.

So now your fuel source is external. And this is what Robert Bussard was already referencing. But remember, when Robert Bussard was going to do it for his inner inner galactic scramjet, he needed to grab the hydrogen from empty space. This was actually the only reason why his idea was shot down. Is that physicists said there's not enough hydrogen in empty space to make your fusion reactor work. Well, there's plenty in the air.

There's plenty in the air and there's plenty in the water. More than you could ever need. So you're going to be able to make that warp drive Bussard fusion reactor work in on Earth. Okay. Okay, we went into ion propulsion already. And I think we talked about ion thrusters, but there's a few different kinds.

Gridded electrostatic thrusters were originally derived from dual plasmatron design. Such designs would accelerate and focus ion beam ions into a beam with force equal to ion mass times the strength of the electric field. An external plasma electron gun expels electrons in exhaust and neutralizes the system. So again, we're making an ion beam and why? Because we want to make a controlled fusion reaction. Hall thrusters use a magnetic field to trap electrons, which are used to ionize the gas and use an electric field to accelerate the ions to create thrust. The electrons also form a virtual cathode in place of a physical grid.

So now you realize the Hall thruster is using like most of the ideas that Robert Bussard talked about. They're all using the same physics. Virtual cathode instead of physical grid to accelerate ions. Electrons are used to neutralize the exhaust. Okay. Let's see. And then plasma thrusters.

Think I'm going to probably skip some of these. We talked about the VASIMR plasma thruster. I think you get some of that. I want to go to my last paper, I think. >> [snorts] >> Now applications, you know what you can do. You can fly around in outer space, guys. You get the point.

Let me see what else. Here's a comparison of the efficiencies for the same payloads. Let me make this bigger for you guys. Long story short, the numbers for the thrust-to-weight ratio, fusion just beats everything. Now if you have zero-point energy, then it's better than all of these. But without zero-point energy, fusion is the best, unless you have antimatter technology.

There you go. And I think this is the Robert Bussard thing here. Yeah, there it is. Robert Bussard ramjet. The exact thing that I was just telling you about. Here it is in the paper.

I didn't even expect it to show up. And you see the magnetic nozzle. That giant magnetic nozzle would pull in all the hydrogen. This is the exact thing people said wouldn't work in outer space. Boom. So even that's referenced in the DERD. And then here's a bunch of DOE programs. Trying to remember if any of these I care about.

NASA programs. Did they reference? No. Privately funded programs. Plasma physics DPF Lawrenceville. Look at this. Tri Alpha. Tri Alpha Energy got a shout-out in this DERD right here. Tri Alpha, which uses beam heated field reverse configuration, have been shown to conceptually have low mass aneutronic fusion propulsion systems that could use direct energy conversion power for plasma ion for propulsion. Their success in the next few years may accelerate the implementation of aneutronic fusion.

And there's a whole chart right here. Even EMC is on here. That's Robert Bussard's company right there. Tri Alpha is right here. They don't even call them TAE back then. They just call them Tri Alpha.

Look, they already raised $50 million when this paper was written. Now they're worth $6 billion. Now they're worth $6 billion. Okay. And then just some developments. We need to make everything better, better magnets.

Let me see, anything else? Uh the the last paper I think has better stuff on it. Now much of the groundwork, as literally at the top here, much of the groundwork for fusion has already been accomplished, including conducting fusion experiments, developing the design, and the analysis of applications. This is crazy. Uh how this is in direct contrast everybody saying fusion is not even close. These guys 15 years ago, 20 years ago writing this paper were like, "No, we've already done everything.

We've already got all the designs. Look, here they are. I just explained them to you tonight. All you have to do is just do it. Like we just need to stop doing tokamaks and we just need to be doing inertial electrostatic confinement fusion and DPF. And we're just going to get there.

And yes, we have things that we have to improve just like all engineering challenges do, but we're already starting at a point where it's feasible. We're starting at a point where it's already feasible right at the beginning. And the reality is they've already done this. They've already done this. They know this works. This is what the government's hiding.

And this is why we don't have it is cuz they know it works. And if we have it, then they did not a secret anymore. So, the last paper that we're going to review puts these all together. This is the colliding beam fusion reactor paper. First of all, this might be the most beautiful diagram I've ever seen. Look at this thing right here.

This is exactly what the DPF was. Two concentric rings, and the outer ring acts like a mirror configuration that confines the ions within it. And if you look at this, you can even see this is a rotating plasma. Literally describes it in the diagram. Says rotating plasma is this pink inner thing. So, the plasma is literally rotating cylindrically in the middle of this.

And that's producing the magnetic field that's confining it. You can even see the current then flows the opposite. And it even says magnetic field FRC right here, field reverse configuration. Even says proton boron 11 is the fusion source. You just look at this and you're like, this is this is it. They just made ion beams that are intersecting that are doing fusion, and we're looking at something that's doing that.

So, here's the paper, colliding beam fusion reactor space propulsion system. >> [snorts] >> Colliding beam fusion reactor space propulsion system is an aneutronic magnetic field reverse configuration, fueled by an energetic ion mixture of hydrogen and boron 11. Particle confinement and transport in the machine in the machine are classical, hence the system is scalable. You can scale the system up. That's like wow. Fusion products are helium ions and alpha particles expended expelled axially out of the system. I I go ahead and bet like a million dollars that we're looking at field reverse configuration orbs.

There's not a lot of configurations that shoot beams actually out just like we're looking at. Everybody else is why are these dark lines like leading the orbs? Uh cuz you're looking at field reverse configuration. That would be my first guess. Alpha particles flowing in one direction are decelerated and their energy is recovered to power the system. Wow.

This is why you read the references, chat. Right there. One of the beams is directly doing the direct energy conversion and I'm assuming it's the forward facing beam. And then that's why we're seeing a dark beam because those are particles being decelerated and being used for directed energy conversion. The particles expelled in the opposite direction provide thrust. So the question in the beginning is we said, how come the orbs only have lines coming out of the back in the beginning? And then we see lines coming out of the front as the video goes on.

Because initially they're only using it for expelling for propulsion and then they turn on directed energy conversion and start charging up. Basically. Since the fusion reaction particles are charged particles, the system does not require the use of a radiation shield. I mean, that was like the biggest thing. The biggest thing of all those papers we just learned is you got to get rid of the neutrons. It's like the whole point of calling them aneutronic fusion propulsion.

This just doesn't require a neutronic shield. Wow. Okay. Um what did I want to hit on on this? Plasma particles possessing non-resonant gyro orbits diffuse rapidly into the separatrix and are expelled from the system out both end lines along the magnetic field lines. Huh.

Um let's see. Oh, this part right here. A system fueled by either deuterium tritium or deuterium helium-3. Helium-3 is the aneutronic fusion fuel that we've been hyping up. Is likely to be far more complex than what is shown in figure two. Where's figure two?

Right here. Yeah. These fuel cycles produce substantially higher fraction of their power output as neutrons. Hence, their energy must be converted in a thermal cycle and therefore into thrust. Neutronic systems also require massive radiation shield. So, basically helium-3 is not even good enough. Helium-3 is not even good enough.

We might be able to get away with helium-3 in some drone orbs that aren't going to have to last for very long. But, if we want a long-lasting, it's basically got to be proton-boron-11 to minimize the neutrons to like zero. That is huge. We were under the impression helium-3 was good enough for aneutronic fusion and they're basically saying it's not. Okay. Um so, proton-boron-11 provides the highest thrust and highest power-to ratio.

Helium-3 is intermediate and DT is the lowest. So, proton-boron-11 actually just mathematically is the best. Pretty cool. Okay, and they go into the reasons why they're I'm just going to kind of skip over some of that. Um the mass estimates. So, a big part of this is how light can you make your object? So, long story short, if we get rid of all the the key elements that we need, now we can make our thing really light. Can we make it light enough to fly around?

I guess that's the big point of contention still after all of this. So, I think this is the parameters oh, the various different parameters for it. So, if you look at this, you'll see the energy requirements are so important here. The fuel ion energy. These ion energies are what we require to produce to actually make fusion happen. And you can see the massive differences um and the temperature requirements here.

You can see that proton boron 11 generally requires much higher than deuterium tritium, which is by far the lowest. Okay, let's see what else. Oh, yeah, and this is what I wanted to look at. I think this might be the last thing we look at right here. This is actually, instead of looking at it like a schematic, this actually just breaks down the various components. So, let me run through the components. I'm going to start at the top left and I'm going to roll clockwise.

Top left, power control electronics. This is why I say there needs to be a control system in the orbs. You need something that's managing the power levels, making sure things don't over short circuit, that's distributing the power appropriately. There has to be some sort of control system. That's what this is. Now, to the right, superconducting magnets.

Superconducting magnetism is important because now we can drive current really high. Superconductivity, in theory, lets you store current infinitely. There's no resistivity. So, superconductivity is huge. Current drive system. We need to have a way, a spinning mechanism in by which to drive current to generate electricity.

Uh ion beam injectors. And right next to the ion beam injectors, you see the fuel tank. So, where are we actually inserting our boron 11 fuel? Into the ion beam injectors. In theory, what we're doing is we're injecting the beams of proton boron 11. And we're injecting it directly into the middle, where our fusion reactor is happening.

So, that's over here on the top right. The magnetic nozzle, that's driving how we we force the the expellant out a certain path. So, the magnetic nozzle says plasma exhaust to space. So, this is makes it so that instead of the exhaust going every direction, we're just shooting in a specific direction to provide thrust. Now, on the bottom right, space space heat radiators, compressor, heat exchanger, and turbo alternator. These are mechanisms by which we're controlling the pressure and the temperature of the fusion reaction. So, if you look at the ion pumpy thing, this would be equivalent to having our pump.

Why do you need a pump at all? Cuz we're controlling the pressure of our core center area where the plasma is confined. So, that's the idea of these things in the bottom right. And then we have directed energy converter, and we also have thermal electric energy converter. This is pretty cool. I had assumed that you would need some sort of thermal electric converter, which converts heat into electricity.

So, there's going to be some heat that's going to be coming off, obviously, the fusion reactor. And you want to keep your temperature relatively even. So, you need some form of converting the heat back into electricity. That's going to be your thermal electric converter. And then of course our directed energy converter is going to be converting that beam of ions pulling energy from them. They're moving really fast and we're slowing them down.

And we're turning that slow down into electricity. That's what directed energy converter is. And then of course we have our batteries or our fuel cells or our capacitor which is okay, we're we're pulling the energy but now we're we store it. And thank you WBGen light Gerald I believe. Appreciate you man. So here you go.

This is probably the simplest graphic that I've seen that lays out all the elements you need for a fusion reactor. And you realize that's not that much stuff. You can you can make this stuff small, really small. Like power control electronics can be a microchip. That can be like smaller than my nail. This stuff doesn't have to be big.

The capacitor bank might be the biggest thing but what if we just store the energy in magnetic fields? Now we don't even need a capacitor bank anymore, at least not a big one. So it's actually crazy how much of this can just go away when you start to really engineer the solutions. And that's what they did in the black projects. They engineered solutions to all this and they turned it into plasma orbs that we see in the videos. Okay, anything else?

So the conclusions, many advanced benefits for space propulsion. Many of the technologies needed either already exist or can be rapidly developed. Okay, blah blah, you get the point. We can make it happen. Let's go to some of the super chats. I'm going to play the Gorgon Stare video before we get to that.

Thank you guys for hanging out tonight. Appreciate you. Thank you pilled chat for showing up. Woke Societies, I'm going to try to get to these super chats. Woke Societies showed up, you gifted the can. Thank you, Woke Societies.

Thank you, everybody in Woke Societies for hanging out in our pilled chat today. We appreciate you guys. I'm going to go ahead and play this Gorgon Stare video for you guys. This was Who found this? I think Hermes found this. Shout out to Hermes. >> The Washington Post reports that this winter the Air Force is set to deploy to Afghanistan what it says is a revolutionary airborne surveillance system called Gorgon Stare, which will be able to transmit live video images of physical movement across an entire town.

The system, made up of nine video cameras mounted on a remotely piloted aircraft, can transmit live images to soldiers on the ground or to analysts tracking enemy movements. It can send up to 65 different images to different users. By contrast, Air Force drones today shoot video from a single camera over a {quote} soda straw area, the size of a building or two. Major General James Poss, the Air Force's Assistant Deputy Chief of Staff for Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance, says that with the new tool analysts will no longer have to guess where to point the camera.

Poss said, {quote} "Gorgon Stare will be looking at a whole city, so there will be no way for the adversary to know what we're looking at, and we can see everything." Officials acknowledge that Gorgon Stare is of limited value unless they match it with improved human intelligence, eyewitness reports of who is doing what on the ground. The Air Force is exponentially increasing surveillance across Afghanistan. The monthly number of unmanned and manned aircraft surveillance sorties has more than doubled since last January. >> Okay, blah blah blah. Basically, if we used AI, this thing would go crazy.

She's like, "Oh, we could use human intelligence to make it better." What if we used AI super intelligence to make it better? Anyone want to broach that? Guys, we missed something. We got to go back. I'm going back. >> [clears throat] >> Guys, we have to go back to the island.

We missed something important. We missed it. OMG's chat. I think it's right here somewhere around here. Hold on. What is it?

Where's the Bremsstrahlung reference? There it is. >> [snorts] >> Oh, chat. We missed something important. Here it is. >> [clears throat] >> A magnetic nozzle directs the remaining alpha particles into space as thrust. Bremsstrahlung radiation is converted into electrical energy by a thermal electric converter. That's what the thermal electric converter is used for. The Bremsstrahlung losses are re-converted back into electricity by the means of a thermal electric generator.

Boom! Oh, no, my Bremsstrahlung losses. Oh, no. Oh, I can't do anything about my Bremsstrahlung losses. Oh, never mind. Here's the solution. Boom, problem solved.

Sweet. Bremsstrahlung energy is not converted by the TE by the TEE is passed into a beta tron cycle heat engine and therefore waste heat is also then rejected into space. A power control subsystem not shown monitors all sources and sinks of electric and heat energy to maintain system operation in the steady state. And to provide independent source of energy to initiate operation of the craft. And I read this and I go, yeah. Exactly.

This is why you need a power control system to start it up and to manage it and to make sure the heat losses and electrical energy is exactly staying in as in operational parameters. Bingo. So there you guys go. Now, what was the last thing I was going to review here? Oh yeah, something else came up on my list here. Where is it?

Oh yeah. One more thing that we got to talk about before I go to these super chats that just popped up is this. >> I think ultimately disclosure's very likely to come from the public first before it comes from government. I think the White House is currently wrestling with this issue. I know the president knows full well now about the existence of the legacy retrieval and reverse engineering program.

I know it's being overseen by um uh people at a very very high level in his office, particularly a guy called Devin Nunes. >> What did you say Ross Coulthart? >> level in his office, particularly a guy called Devin Nunes. >> [music] >> Devin Nunes? Holy [ __ ] Chad. Guys, who did I say Trump was going to sign as defend the director of national intelligence? Who did I say Trump was going to sign as director of national intelligence? Oh, Devin Nunes. Why?

Because of this. Because of this. >> This is this is breakthrough technology. When this is done, and I don't say this lightly, this will be the most important discovery and invention since the first Manhattan project. So, we we did a lot of searching, John. You know, all over the United States. We looked at a lot of the the the emerging nuclear power companies, and there's nothing nothing that stands that holds a candle to this company.

So, look, we we want to be right in the middle of the most important issue at the highest level. What does America really need? When we started Truth Social, we needed free speech. We saved that. Now, somebody's got to step up and do something to produce real energy in this country, and we're going to do it. >> Are you kidding me? The UFO people have no clue.

They have How can Like, if you just watch this live stream and I just play that clip and I tell you that Devin Nunes is in control of the UFOs. You say, "Yeah, of course he is. He's promoting TriAlpha Energy and and Aneutronic Fusion." And I'm reading to you Defense Intelligence Reference Documents that were declassified all about it. >> [laughter] >> You Are you kidding me right now? TriAlpha Energy was referenced in those documents. I just read it to you.

I just read it to you. Why do you think they picked TriAlpha Energy suddenly to merge with to have Trump Media Group merge with TriAlpha Energy? Are you guys not How are you not putting these pieces together, man? I don't want this to be real, either. I don't want there to be secret free energy technologies and my government to be teleporting airplanes. I don't want it to be real.

I'm just saying it's undeniable when you look at the evidence. It's pretty Like, people are going to look back at this and they're going to be like, "This was the most obvious cover-up ever. How did we not figure this out?" And we're just going to laugh at them like, "Yeah, we tried to tell you. It was just super obvious. You just had to watch like one live stream.

You could watch one live stream and you could figure out obviously this is what's going on. This Holy [ __ ] that was Devin Nunes. Devin Nunes is in charge of the UFOs. Unreal. I believe it. I believe it 100%.

Okay guys, that was your moment of zen. Let's go to the super chats. Everybody in my Rumble chat, double L SMASH Bros, wild lurker. Oh man, we got a lot of people laughing cat, so many people in the Rumble chat tonight. Double L gives a dono. He says, I support my favorite A neutronic fusion professor and his dog. Thank you, sir.

Appreciate you. I scared Lulu a second ago. She was chilling down here and then I had my freak out. A guy called Devin Nunes. Now now I don't know if he's actually going to be DNI. I mean, he's actually just in charge of the UFO phenomenon.

He doesn't really need to be DNI. But this was exactly why I thought they were going to make him DNI because I'm like, this is the guy that he knows about the the secrets. He's also on Trump's national security advisory team, I think, so. So like, they know, guys. And people are saying, well, this is a need-to-know basis for the president. Okay, well, Trump needs to know when there's a guy on social media revealing our space-time manipulation technology.

So even if Trump didn't find out before, which I'm sure he did, he definitely needs to know when there's just a dude on social media like exposing it all publicly. He definitely knows, guys. Honestly, I'm waiting for the day where they call me up and they're like, okay Ashton, now is the time. Bring you in. Teach us about the Teach us about the UFOs cuz truthfully, I don't know if they know the bigger picture.

Like this is set up in such a way where even when you're brought in and you are briefed on it, my guess is you don't really know about all the programs going on. You only see like a pigeonhole of it. So they probably know that this is going on and we have this technology, but they maybe don't know the larger picture of how how it's being used and all the different scenarios. Scary, man. Okay. Let's go to the super chats in our YouTube.

And again, thank you guys in the pill chat. Appreciate you. Leslie Wisdom, congrats on the potential cooperation from a trusted source after 3 years of solo work. Yeah, I mean, Bari Weiss makes a lot of sense. I could see getting a lot of flak though if Bari Weiss decided to come along with it cuz you got the whole Palestine Israel thing, what have you. Um but for the most part, I think something this big like it really deserves a bigger platform and more attention.

If there's somebody that can actually corroborate the videos, corroborate the systems, corroborate the real events of the plane that night and what we see happening to the plane in those videos, Chad. Chad, I'll just say I have a I wish I could say more about this, but I just really don't want to put it in a jeopardy, but if I do this, I'm going to do it right and I'm going to make it extremely difficult for people to try to say that it's [ __ ] or these people are that this person's making it up. We'll see.

Markiplier, thanks Ashton for the advanced felony fusion class. Yeah, guys, not only do you know more about fusion than most nuclear physicists now, now you know about the felony fusion. The felony fusion physics, which is the advanced anisotropic fusion fuels and how they the mechanisms by which they're doing that fusion, which would seem impossible to everybody else. 10:13 flies I wouldn't say I'm anti-matter, I just want free energy. Thank you very much, man. We got the Laffy Taffy jokes going on here.

Appreciate you, brother. Sonia Sullivan, huge donation. Thank you, Sonia Sullivan. I appreciate you. Keep grounded and rest on your facts. Other than that, this goes out to Lulu.

Thank you very much guys. We'll give Lulu the treats here. Let's see if we can get her up here. Up, there she is. She already hears it. The moment she hears the bag, chat.

Come on Lulu. Let's go. What's this? Where's the treats? You want the treats, Lulu? What's this?

Okay, yes, she's not coming over here yet. Maybe she'll come over here in a second. But yes, we'll make sure we get Lulu treated right. And then BC War X with the other huge super chat for your security or for your drinks, guys. One thing too I'll say is that I spoke kind of extensively. I asked this person a lot of questions.

I wanted to try to vet them, make sure this is not a scam or something. And um uh crap. What was I going to say about them? Oh, yeah, I asked like why are they coming to me as opposed to CNN, you know, one of the Why if you have some secret about the missing plane, why wouldn't you go to mainstream media with it?

Now, I kind of knew the answer, you know, but um so I want to be able to answer those types of questions for people that are going to be coming in going, "Okay, well, why if this guy has some secrets about some crazy videos, why are you why are you coming to this guy? Why are you going to me as opposed to someone else?" Um but I think there's pretty logical answers for that.

And the truth is, I mean, as it started dawning on me about what I might be able to do here with this interview, it started dawning on me that we could actually create an international incident. Like this isn't a This isn't a joke. Like this person had to get permission to talk. Like serious permission. And the reason for that is because if this is true, then this is an actual international incident. Now, China already probably knows about the plane, of course.

But their public doesn't. And if the public were to find out, they're going to freak out. Malaysia or China finds out that the United States was responsible for the missing plane, they're going to freak out. It's going to cause an international incident. So, I don't know. I just want people to understand I am thinking about the consequences of everything that I do.

And I don't take these actions lightly. And the person that's doing this is not afraid for something to happen to them, and I'm not afraid, either. And if anything does happen to us in the time before we record this, then you should definitely consider it to be highly suspicious. So, that's all tonight, guys. Love you all. We'll be back on Friday.

Have a great night. Peace out, everybody. Later. >> Out [music] in the fields where the skies are wide, talking about a journey through the cosmic ride. Einstein and [music] Thorne, they set the stage for trip through time across the space age. Wormholes connect distant points in space. Traversible paths to a far-off place. >> [music] >> No black holes pull, no crushing weight, just a cosmic tunnel to a distant gate. >> Talking wormholes, stargates, [music] negative energy.

Travel through the cosmos, it's our destiny. MH370, [music] where did it go? Boeing 777 through a wormhole flow. Talking wormholes, [music] stargates, negative energy. Travel through the cosmos, it's our destiny. MH370, [music] where did it go?

Boeing 777 through a wormhole flow. >> [music] >> Exotic matter, [music] negative energy's the key to stabilize the wormhole for you and me. Quantum vacuum squeeze so tight, creating conditions for this wondrous flight. Static [music] fields and lasers in the lab they play, generating forces in a new kind [music] of way. Gravitational squeezing, Casimir force, negative zones we need to stay the course. >> Talking [music] wormholes, stargates, negative energy. Travel through the cosmos, it's our [music] destiny. MH370, where did it go?

Boeing 777 [music] through a wormhole flow. >> Thin shell formalism plays so fine. Spherical geometry we realize. Energy [music] conditions that we must defy. For stable wormhole, let's give it a try. >> [music] [music] >> Komodo forces balancing the plates, creating a throat. Open the gates. From Earth to the stars in a single bound.

A shortcut through space profound. Engineers [music] and dreamers hold the key to future worlds and what we could be. With science in hand, we forge ahead through the cosmic paths that we now tread. >> With our wormholes, stargates, [music] negative energy. Travel through the cosmos, it's our destiny. MH370, where did it go? Boeing 777 [music] through a wormhole flow. >> From the fields to the stars, we break the chains.

Understanding the universe, we make [music] the gains. Louis Crane shines, bringing truth to light. Through his music, [music] we'll explore the night. With wormholes and stargates, our path is clear. Exploring the cosmos, our future's here.