The Air Force Paper That Should Not Be Public

these orbs of energy, these UFOs, people are seeing in the sky, are most likely fusion reactors. Now, in the story that we have presented about these fusion reactor drone orbs, there's been a missing link. The missing link is how did we get to fusion reactor drones flying around in the sky when we don't even have fusion? I'm going to present to you the answer to the missing link right now. This was something that I just had on my computer that for some reason, it took me a while to actually pull up and find the reference.

I had to dig around in the Wayback Machine to find this. Fusion electric propulsion for hypersonic flight. This right here is the missing link we've been looking for. How do we combine the aerospace engineers and the energy production guys, the fusion guys, into our drone? This paper from I can't remember if it's 1998 or 2001, somewhere around there. Anyway, around 2000, is by David Froning and Robert Bussard.

Chat, the ultimate crossover episode. This is like Flintstones meets Goku, Chat. You never know who's going to come together. I could have probably come with a better crossover there. But, look at this. Let's take a stroll through this.

I've barely had a chance to read this. We're not going to read it all here. I'll put it in the Discord for you guys later. It's only a few pages long. Recent studies by Bussard have shown that the charge of a nuclear a nuclei of a certain light element isotopes can be electrostatically compressed to a sufficient density for nuclear fusions to occur. The resulting fusion reactor reactions involving such nuclei uh emit no neutrons aneutronic and induce no radioactivity at all.

Such clean fusion reactors can develop four to eight times more engine thrust per fuel than chemical reactions with attractive engine thrust to weight ratios. This paper shows that such propulsion could enable a two to fivefold two to five times improvement in payload delivery efficiency for Earth to orbit aerospace planes.

Now, in addition to that, it mentions early on if we go down over here on the right in the background, it says the use of inertial electrostatic confinement of fusion fuels was first proposed by Elmore and Hirsch and showed that high fusion reaction rates could be achieved by compressing ions with grid potentials in a spherically concentric device. The amounts of fusion were limited due to the particle collisions. These limitations were overcome by Bussard with novel magnetic electrostatic means for trapping electrons to produce a stable negative potential well for ion confinement. Okay? So, these form the basis for DARPA's contract that invested in this.

And now, look at the next page. This is crazy. This is why we just started, guys. If you just got here we're starting with this new breakthrough. You can rewind a little bit if you want to see what it is, but it's essentially Bussard and Froning. This proves the crossover between fusion and aerospace.

They just called it hypersonic, but we can just look at it from the perspective of a drone. Look at the very first paragraph after the introduction. Directed energy conversion. We know that only aneutronic fuels do this. Look at the list of fuels. First one, proton boron 11.

First one, proton boron 11. Honestly, can we learn something from this right here? So, first one, proton boron 11. Second one, proton lithium 6. Ah, this is why. Look at this, chat.

This is why they don't do lithium 6. By the way, chat, you are watching the the world's leading expert in fusion live streams right now. Out of all the live streamers in the world, I am the one that knows the most about fusion. There are some people that do YouTube videos that know more, and clearly more people that don't stream at all that know more than I do. But, of the live streamers, chat, I'm on the top. The reason why they don't use lithium is because the energy release is too low.

4 mega electron volts. You get two heliums, but you get only 4 mega electron volts of energy. Proton boron 11 releases 8.7. Much more. But, interestingly, if you could control the fusion reaction, then the secondary pathway. So, you see what happens here is the proton lithium 6 creates two helium 3s, or one helium three and one helium four.

And then some of those react with the lithium six. And that produces more helium four, another proton, and then more energy. Oh, wow. I just realized something. Should I even say this? This might be what nuclear weapons are based on.

Chat, I just went full autistic mode. First 10 minutes of the live stream. We might have figured out a nuclear weapon secret here. Look at this. One of the first things in Friedwardt Winterberg's thermonuclear weapons textbook is the lithium six pathway. And you see that it essentially just goes around in a circle.

Releases helium releases helium four in the process. Double reaction. Mhm. I wonder if they have weaponized that. Never mind. We're going to move on.

Deuterium helium three releases 18.3. So, this is the reason why they're probably targeting helium three because it releases twice more than twice as much as proton boron 11. Oh, but does it release three of these? No. I think this is right. >> [clears throat] >> And then it should mention directed energy conversion here. Charged particles escaping radially from the center of the fusion reactor sphere can induce current flow in the spherical shell grid structures to control voltage gradients of opposing potentials surrounding a power generating fusion core. I mean, Jesus, chat. Chat.

Have we actually seen this written down on the paper like this? This is the ion pumpy thing. How I'm just thinking in my head here I'm thinking in my head here Like did the person that sent me the ion pumpy thing is there some way they could have known this without knowing it? I don't know. Anyway. So, they're saying we can use the charged particles with a fusion core in the middle of this with some grids on the outside and it can produce electricity then this way.

And some people ask or probably wonder if we have access to free energy zero point energy, why do we have a fusion reactor? Well, because all that energy is trapped. All that energy is trapped and we're not getting that unless we do something first. So, we need a power generating source that can tap into that zero point energy. Okay. And then we know a lot about the performance from an ISP perspective the performance is obviously much better than any chemical rocket. Um and that's just in terms of straight up efficiency.

It may not be able to move as fast as a rocket can, at least not initially, but it will build up especially in outer space. Let's see, anything else? Okay. Um So, let's see benefits for hypersonic. Fusion electron electron beam discharge into a propellant and air flow would produce significant amounts of ozone in the upper atmosphere. Huh.

So, basically these things Wait, this is good, actually. Oh, sorry. I'm not showing the screen. So, chat, ozone's good, right? I kind of get confused. I'm not I I don't care enough about the environment.

So, someone correct me. Tell me real quick if ozone is good. If ozone's good, then when I debate Tom Valone, he's cooked. Because turns out our fusion reactors just make ozone. So, it might turn out that our our flying Jarvis orbs, chat, they might just fix the environment, too. They might just fix the environment.

It is good. Thank you for the correction. Thank you. Appreciate it. No, it's good for the atmosphere, right? That's the thing that we're like losing because we did we destroyed the atmosphere.

I'm not sure of like my climate change alarmist narratives. Okay, great. Thank you. So, it turns out our fusion orbs also fix the environment. Brand new talking point. I need to mark that one down.

Checkmate, hippies. Check and mate. Okay, well, I didn't know we were going to see that in here. Let me just see if there's anything else now that I see this. It says clean environmentally favorable fusion electric propulsion, similar to what has been described, would revolutionize air flight and space flight if it were combined with technologies such as air-breathing propulsion and reusable structures that are for emerging hypersonic flight. This isn't There's no way this is published in 1993.

1993? Wow. Okay. Definitely. Checkmate. Bingo.

This is it right here. Yeah. First of all, we've had the solution to fixing the environment and it comes in the form of free energy Jarvis orbs that can be that can be flown around by AI that can teleport planes. And we're hiding that.