The Plane Carried 20 Chip Engineers

We might be changing minds on the plane. Now, I know it's impossible for a lot of people to believe that we have teleportation technology. do you think I would have believed that 5 years ago? No chance, man. No chance. But now we do. It's really impossible to believe, but it's easier for people to understand that the United States vanished that aircraft.

Because there's a missing airplane. There's a real missing airplane called Malaysian Airlines flight 370. It was just missing. No one knows where the body of the bulk of the plane is. We found like 10 pieces at best. 10 tiny pieces of a giant Boeing 777. And we found them randomly washed ashore.

So we don't even know where the plane is. It's easier for people to understand the United States did this than it is for people to understand that we have teleportation tech. So the missing link, the thing that's going to break this wide open isn't probably going to be teleportation being proven. It's going to be the United States being responsible for the missing plane. That will be proven before teleportation gets proven. The United States is responsible for the missing plane.

I mean, not wholly responsible. China deserves a little blame, too. But we teleported it though with some orbs. Reason why I say that, here's Jeff Wise. If you guys have checked out the Netflix documentary about MH370, then I feel bad for you. I tried to watch it.

It was horrible. And then I saw the videos and I went back and rewatched it and I realized it's even worse than I thought. MH370 mystery deepens. Why the cockpit theory doesn't add up. Brutal, man. An hour and 40 minutes about why the cockpit theory doesn't add up.

There's just no way this needs to be an hour and 40 minutes, my dude. This has got to be You've got to be There's got be a way you can turn this down to 5 minutes. >> Look a lot more like what Vladimir Putin wants it to LOOK LIKE. >> I DUDE, I CALLED IT, BRO. I called it. It was He found a way to pull Vladimir Putin into this. Come on, man. Come on, man.

And the sad part is he's not paid propaganda, he's just actually an idiot. He's just actually dumb, chat. He's just These people are They're just NPCs, dude. They're NPCs. I don't know how else to describe it. I don't think Jeff Wise has an inner monologue.

I'm pretty sure he's just saying something that's coming to him in the moment like a script feeding somebody. >> Well, I guess so Yeah, maybe I guess the the jump back to like what So, why what would be and I know this would have to be an assumption on your part, right? Uh but why MH370 if you needed this thing to be a distractor or to change the narrative or capture the news cycle? >> plane? >> Yeah, why not just like And and why this why this plane? And then also like why not if you could control it just pack it in the ocean?

Um I mean so, couple of those questions popped in my mind, but again, why why this plane first? >> So, I as you say, I can only >> So, now >> [clears throat] >> I'm I'm I'm piecing together the context just like you, chat. Sounds like he's saying that they can remote control the aircraft, that intelligence communities can remote control the aircraft. Uh yeah. Uh yeah. And now he's trying to figure out why they would interfere with this plane. Um could it be the 20 engineers on board?

Chat, the plane's loaded with 20 microchip engineers that work for an American defense contractor that just released a microchip days before this that was so small that it fit within the dimple of a golf ball. Do you think that could be the reason? Flying to Beijing seems like a pretty weird place for them to be flying to to be intercepted. Hmm. This is what I'm saying, chat. We can win people over.

Like I probably if I do this all over, if I could go back in time again, I already went back in time one time already chat from the future. If I could go back in time again, I probably just wouldn't even talk about teleportation. I would just say that's a visual effect. They edited a visual effect in there. They cloaked the plane or something. I don't know.

I'll just make something up. Doesn't matter. People are stupid. But instead, you just focus on the fact that the United States is responsible. Like I really wish the videos didn't have them teleporting the plane in it. Like what if it just cut out right before they teleport the plane?

How great would that be? Cuz we'd be like, "Look, the United States is responsible. They did some weird orb with the plane, but we don't know what they did." The fact that the videos actually show them teleporting the plane is kind of a problem because that's the part people can't believe. People can probably even believe in some orbs. They just can't believe in the teleportation.

That's the part that breaks their minds. So the You know what? I That would be the move, guys. Let's send a message to the past or to the future, however this works, I don't know. This is what we need to will. Use your psychic powers, guys.

Please, everybody, all my remote viewers out there, please harness your psychic powers. We need to remember to go send a message to the future to edit out the last 5 seconds of the video. So that the MH370 videos don't have the zap in them. And then we could convince everybody. Do it now. I don't know.

If psychic powers are real, maybe we just send a message to the past. Yeah, oh, sorry. I didn't say ohm enough times. Ohm. Ohm. Yeah, I think the message is received. It's not sure, though.

Okay, keep going, Jeff. Could I make a theory? Make a supposition? And I my my my supposition for this is that when you find a vulnerability, if you're looking if we look at it if we sort of put on our cybersecurity hat, we we and we're supposing now that this is not a murder suicide but a cybersecurity operation, then in order to carry out a hack, you need to find a system that's vulnerable. >> Hey guys, you know any systems that might be vulnerable? Hey guys, hey here you go, Jeff. Let I have a thought.

Hey, there's one system I can think of that might be vulnerable. Hmm. Guys, look, I'm just the number one MH370 investigator and you know, not a big deal. Inmarsat, the satellite company that we got those satellite pings from, turns out they're actually controlled by United States Intelligence. Like openly controlled by them. It's not a secret.

That seems like that could be a pathway by which they could put some fake pings in there and send us in the wrong direction. Just going to go ahead and throw that out there. Now let's fast forward to current day. We searched where those satellite pings told us to go. We said, "Oh, the plane went in the South Indian Ocean. These satellite pings from Inmarsat.

They've been verified. Everybody's verified the satellite pings. Got to be real." That vulnerability in MH370, it is Inmarsat, the satellite pinging company. Now, since I am Ashton Forbes and I always bring the receipts and I am the number one investigator, I will bring those receipts right now. These are the satellite pings right here.

Yes, you are looking at the real MH370 satellite pings. And you say, "This is the satellite pings?" Yes, this is the complete and full data of the satellite pings from the point when the plane was at the Nicobar Islands, right here, 18:40, to to where the plane runs out of fuel. Or not quite runs out of fuel, but well, less than 1 hour after before it runs out of fuel right here. This right here, 10 rows of Excel data that is actually completely dissimilar to the rest of the data. That is the only reason why people are searching in the South Indian Ocean.

I'm going to go full screen so you can see it. I call it sketchy pings. Look at this column right here, the third column over. The data completely changes for just those fake pings right there. Those pings are fake, chat. That's all they had to do, 10 rows on an Excel spreadsheet.

Somebody probably wrapped this up before lunchtime. >> As I mentioned, like most planes, you can't take over from the electronics bay. Most SATCOM systems can't be altered to make it look like it's it's sending navigation information that's actually been spoofed. Very few aircraft, and I need to do an episode where I sort of break down like what all the requirements are and how that >> This is all like, "Yo, people are people you can't fake this data." I'm like, "Dude, I just showed you the data. I just showed it to you.

You don't think somebody can fake 10 rows You don't think the CIA can fake 10 rows on an Excel spreadsheet? Bro, that is not They probably have a ranking of challenging tasks they have to pull off. That one's at the at the very bottom, bro. >> narrows down the list of possible targets. But my theory is that basically there were very, very few targets that you could have attacked in order to carry out this particular vulnerability, which is a very, very specific vulnerability. Which which by the way doesn't exist anymore. Like MH370 couldn't be carried out today if my theory is right.

Um things have just >> Is he going to tell us his theory? I can't stand this guy, man. I still don't really know what the he's talking about. >> have been changed. For instance, one of the things is that the Inmarsat service, if you paid the premium and you're getting the highest level of service, it had encoded with every data packet the GPS location. And so there would have been no ambiguity as exactly where this plane went. >> Would that data not be captured anyways and just not shared with Malaysian Airlines because they didn't pay for it or is that >> It was not captured.

It was not transmitted. And so yeah, they would have otherwise. And um so >> Yeah, chat. That Inmarsat data. If they had only bought the extra deluxe package If they had bought the extra deluxe package, we'd know where the plane is right now. But too bad.

They just didn't pay for that package that Inmarsat data that they already have. Otherwise, we'd know. Inmarsat couldn't possibly know. I mean, they would tell the truth if they knew. Guys, if Inmarsat knew where the plane was, they would tell us the truth. They've no reason to lie.

It's not like they're responsible for the missing plane. Unless their friends are responsible. Hm. >> Because but so Malaysian Airlines is was sort of in a was in a bad state financially and they kind of were cutting corners and they paid for the cheaper >> And by the way, yes, when I was joking, this is the this is the rub. Their engine systems the cover-up of the engine systems is that oh, they didn't pay for the special package. So therefore, we didn't have the engine data, Rolls-Royce engine data, and that's transmitting in real time. They're like, um They definitely did.

And the other part of it is how many people could even rig the sat the computer system? Whatever was required to make this computer system go dark and then turn back on is not the kind of thing like a random pilot knows about and definitely not a random passenger. People gloss over this because there's actually a technical requirement to make this plane go dark beyond just turning a dial and that's all anybody talks about when they do their YouTube videos. They go, "Oh, this guy just turned the dial and the plane went down. Are you kidding me? That is not what they're saying happened.

That is not what technically is going on. And they do that because the fiction they're inventing where they're trying to make up a pilot did this. That's the only way that story can work is if they make up fake details. The same thing where they'll say he was flying to avoid radar. No, he wasn't. That's not a thing.

A, that's not a thing on a commercial airplane. You can't fly to avoid radar. Radars don't magically stop at an invisible barrier in the sky. It's like they just make up these details that don't exist because they're trying to come up with a story that's not true. At some point when you have no evidence, nothing that makes any sense, you have to start looking at things that are unconventional. And I would not be pushing teleportation if I didn't have two, not one, two military videos showing it with coordinates.

So, we know exactly where the operation happened. And they're two videos in perfect sync from completely different angles. For the visual effects people, this means you can't use two-dimensional cloud photos. This camera over here is seeing details about clouds that this camera can't even see. Do you get that? Let me be clear about that.

This camera over here looking this way is seeing details about clouds over here and the other side of the cloud that this camera can't even see. And we can line up both videos and we can see the same clouds in both videos. We can see the same clouds in both videos. So, we know if somebody faked it, this needs a 3D, three-dimensional, recreation. Do you see a lot of three-dimensional recreations that look realistic? No. The reason why is because it's practically impossible and extremely resource intensive. To get it to look somewhat convincing at all.

All the recreations you see of the MH370 videos are somebody trying to recreate one video in 2D. None of them are even meeting the first bar to fake to make these videos. The first thing you have to do is make a 3D scene and then set both your camera points. And the reason why no one even begins trying to do that is it we're talking months if not years of work. Probably years of work. Definitely not within the 30 days or something that somebody had to release these videos.

No chance. Is he going to say anything useful here? >> Yes, this would have to be I mean, this would be state actor level >> Oh, here we go. >> requirement of not only the capability to take a plane and control but then also having like the awareness >> Kill me here. >> of radar coverage. >> Yes. >> So that you can shoot between the gaps. >> Yep. >> I also think too, you know, just the initial waypoint, right? So if >> Notice how he's saying everything that I'm saying. Notice how these guys have said, "I didn't watch this before, by the way."

The reason why they're saying basically everything that I'm saying is because I'm the best investigator on MH370. It's not really even close. I walk circles around these guys, which is no disrespect to them. It just is what it is. They just don't see the bigger picture. But yes, you would need state actors.

The radars. You can't just turn off all these radars. The radars they got covered up. Thailand, India. These were radars that were in range of the plane. Do you guys know there were radars in range of the plane when it supposedly vanished off of radar?

How's that possible? Where Where's India's radar? Where's Thailand's radar? Uh well, they're allies of the United States. They're not allies of Russia. Who do you think made that radar go away?

It's really not that hard. There's only like two radars that need to go away. >> ception. And again, when you talk to people, you say, "Well, why did he Why did he turn the SDU off? Why would a pilot do this incredibly difficult thing that every 777 pilot I've said to says they don't know how to do it, and they wouldn't do it?" >> So, there you go, right there. Even Jeff Wise admits nobody even knows how to turn the computer off. This is a requirement.

This happened on the plane. The SDU, it's like their computer system, turns off. The pilots don't even know how to do that. This is a big problem when you're trying to tell me that the pilot did it. Because there's a thing that happened that no pilots even know how to do. And people just hand-wave that.

They're like, "Yeah, he just he probably like studied how to do that, mess with the SDU while he was flying the plane." So, what? He was flying the plane, messing with the SDU, also communicating with ground control? All in the 1 minute? Like, this is just physically not possible for the pilot to be responsible. Simple as that.

There's no story that makes any sense for the pilot to have done it. People are only saying the pilot did it cuz they just don't want to blame the government, the people who really did it, which is the United States. You kind of forgot about one theory. Uh those two plane Those two videos of the plane being teleported out of the sky. Like, the actual evidence, like the best evidence that exists in the world of what happened to the plane. You kind of forgot that theory, Jeff.

How delusional do these people have to be to ignore the most popular theory out there and pretend like it doesn't even exist? How could we not solve MH370? At this point, you look at who we have investigating, you wonder there's no chance we were going to ever solve. Why did we ever think we would? We have the most incompetent people at possible at the helm. It almost seems like it's intentional.

Make sure the most incompetent people are in the impossible at the helm, and nothing will ever get solved. Same with the UFO thing. Put Avi Loeb in charge. Like, "Hey, who should we put in charge? Who should we put in charge of figuring out aliens? How about the guy that says they're flying around in space rocks.

Yeah, perfect. That's exactly who you want to be in charge if you're not trying to figure anything out. The guy that's as far away from this truth as you can possibly be. Mhm. Okay. >> So he was So this is the great paradox. >> One more minute of this. >> the MH370 that seem directly contradictory. One, it was an incredibly successful act of deception, and B, it the the inescapable conclusion is that the captain did it.

That's a really shitty unsuccessful act of deception. >> That's it. That's all I can take from this guy. Ugh. Ugh. Anyway. I would love to have a real debate with one of these MH370 people, but they're all just afraid, honestly.

And it's I mean, they should be afraid. If you look at it, you realize you watch one of my live streams and you realize that they just don't have any of the evidence. And all they have are these stories and platitudes that don't mean anything. It's like those can only take you so far, you know? You can only go and stand on stage and talk and virtue signal for so long before people actually want some content.