The Dense Plasma Focus Paper That Explains Everything

Video Transcript

They're building these psycho orbs to teleport [ __ ] for the US Air Force. Here you go. Here's the paper where they were doing it. And by the way, pay attention. It's about to get super crazy. This vehicle is an aerospace plane that combines clean a neutronic dense plasma focus. There's the buzzword, a neutronic fusion, meaning directed energy conversion. What this means is they're generating the electricity through nuclear processes and they're using that electricity right there on board to power the craft. So that little orb it has all the fuel it needs. All the fuel it needs is just what it gets from the air. That's it. That's all it needs. If this sounds like some crazy Star Wars Star Trek [ __ ] now you're starting to get it. Now you're starting to get what's really going on here. Now I'm going to tell you this paper's from 2004. This paper's over 20 years old. Over 20 years old. Okay, keep going. Now it gets good. So it uses a neutronic fusion with advanced wave rider airframe configurations utilizing air breathing magnetohydrodynamic propulsion using it using magnetism. It's using magnetism for propulsion within a reusable single-stage vehicle. The applied approach was to evaluate the fusion system geometry, mass, etc. of a baseline proton-boron-11 fusion device with a over unity factor Q factor of three. So they're they're saying in a hypothetical scenario, what would be the evaluation of the math that we throw in here? So basically when you if you guys don't know what these numbers means, they're basically saying the efficiency of the energy input how much thrust output you get. And the numbers are astronomical. Basically, this is the answer to future spaceflight. Obsolesce all former spaceflight. And then here it says, "The Q factor ranges from three to six." This means for every unit input of energy, you're getting that much output. That may not be the overall end efficiency factor, but that's the idea behind that number. So, that's like six times the amount of energy out than in. And then it says right there, "resulting in gigawatts of excess power." So, you wonder, how are we going to power our AI data centers? You're you're looking at it. Those fusion reactors, that's how they're going to power those AI data centers right there. Okay. Now, [snorts] authors, Franklin Mead, Robert Thomas, Kenneth Shoulders, uh George Miley, David Froning. Let's get to the sauce. I'll add some commentary in the middle of this, so it doesn't get too dry. >> [sighs] >> Open your Bibles, chat. We're going to skip ahead to chapter five. Chapters one through four are interesting, teaches you about his history of him working on the anti-missile capabilities, and it helps you to understand how this guy was in the black world. He was helping build military stuff. He had a He had a a clearance. They trusted him. And then when he was working on this aerospace stuff, he got interested in advanced concepts. And he probably just learned right away that they're real. >> [clears throat] >> Chapter five, page 56, "Air breathing and nuclear fusion power and propulsion. Chat, I went to a full mast when I read the just the name of this chapter. I went, "Wait a minute. I I've been talking about this scientific paper this guy wrote about a neutronic fusion. I thought there was no other documentation on the internet about that." And he wrote a whole book about it. This whole chapter is literally about that dense plasma focus thing. So, I'm not going to read the whole thing for multiple reasons, one of which I don't want to get copyright strike, but I'm going to read some significant portions of it. So, he says, "My arrowhead space Zeus control fins." So, he's talking about his, you know, his missile stuff. Uh which funneled scorching hot air towards each control fin shaft had revealed my woeful ignorance of supersonic combustion ramjet scramjet propulsion. So, I resolved to remedy this as soon as possible. So, he comes in saying, "I was working on these advanced concepts for millet from missiles, etc. And then we wanted to take it to the next level. We wanted to step it up a level." And this is what got him connected to working at McDonnell Douglas on a DARPA project and an Air Force project called the National Aerospace Plane, NASP. Now, what they were trying to do here is produce a reusable rocket, something like ironically, like what Elon Musk is doing right now with SpaceX, landing his little rockets. They wanted to reduce the cost of space missions by making it so that we don't throw away half the stuff and to reduce the fuel cost. Because if we reduce the weight of our machine, we don't need all that fuel anymore. Now, we can get this thing light enough in theory where we can just use the air and fusion reactions and get enough thrust to get up to to outer space. That was the end goal. And in the interim, what they were trying to do is basically like have a plane that's already in the sky and then release this thing from the plane that's already in the sky and then it would take off. So, those are the couple of ideas they had. Now, he says, "So, somewhat on my own, I began looking for ways to reduce NASP propellant." Right here, he was trying to reduce the overall propellant in this. And this is crazy. If Elon Musk hasn't read this book, I would never get on a SpaceX rocket in my life. If he hasn't read this book, I would never never trust him, period. I would never trust any aerospace engineer who hasn't read this. Right here in this paragraph, he's saying that he already went through like probably 50 years ago, 40 years ago, trying to figure out how to reduce the propellant. And he says, "Dr. Frank Meade underlined it." It's underlined throughout the whole book. Dr. Frank Meade, the guy I've been talking about saying that this guy was like the brain trust of the orbs. Dr. Frank Meade, no. It was It wasn't just Frank Meade. David Froning was definitely involved. A visionary scientist that headed much of the Air Force advanced propulsion research was pursuing possibilities for a much more intense heating of hydrogen propellant other than by the the usual way of mixing and burning it in oxygen or in the air. One possibility was intense heating of hydrogen by energy released from clean aneutronic fusion of hydrogen and boron 11 nuclei. Oh boy, it's all coming together now. A neutron fusion disclosure 2026. How did Ashton Forbes know to brand a neutron fusion disclosure 2026? Because the aliens psychically downloaded into my brain, chat. We're going with it. That's how you get on the podcasts. Not hard work. Hard work doesn't get you anywhere. You have to make up fake stories about aliens downloading [ __ ] in your brain, and then they'll listen to your story. You're learning lessons here, chat. Okay. So, after the aliens downloaded the information into our brains, uploaded, sorry. Uploaded, I don't know how it works. Uploaded, downloaded, you guys get the point. Whatever. Okay. Another was energy released from mutual annihilation of small amounts of matter and antimatter. Now, this is interesting. I considered for a while, could these orbs be using matter-antimatter annihilation for their propulsion? Ultimately, there's a part in this book later on where it leads me to believe that they they ended up using the fusion propulsion instead. And that it didn't work with the uh a with the uh matter-antimatter. I'll see if I can find the quote. I'm going to keep going with this paragraph cuz you need to hear the rest of this. I also received antimatter help from Dave Morgan and Steve Howe of Lawrence Livermore and Los Alamos National Laboratories. So, he was getting help from the DOE nuclear engineer scientists. The high priests of physics, according to Jeffrey Epstein. You can't even make this [ __ ] up, Chad. You can't even make this up. Jeffrey Epstein was the one calling these people the high priest of physics. He says, "Also, and he got fusion propulsion help from George Miley of the University of Illinois. And from Robert Bussard of EMC2." What? The Robert Bussard that's talking about the tokamaks are a junk garbage? Talking about how we got to use inertial electrostatic confinement fusion? Holy crap. Now I know exactly what cool fusion is. Who is Where is that missile man guy who was talking [ __ ] about cool fusion? We're about to bury that guy. We're about to We're about to put that guy's corpse in a shallow grave, put a little bit of dirt on it, and call it a day. Holy smokes, metaphorically. Metaphorically, Chad. People get so upset. So upset. Okay. Um let me go to some more stuff here. Um Okay, but antimatter work was finally discontinued because of uncertainty in needing shielding mass to absorb the intense gamma rays emitted by total annihilation of matter. And also, uncertainty in the high cost to manufacture antimatter. So therefore, our work finally focused on clean fusion of hydrogen spec- And it calls out specifically proton boron 11. With energy from their fusion heating airflow. Holy [ __ ] Chad. With energy from their fusion heating airflow in either a nuclear rocket or ramjet scramjet engine. Unfortunately, proton boron-11 fusion required much more energy input and higher fusion temperatures than other fusion reactors. But other fusion reactions emitted high-energy neutrons that caused radioactivity. By contrast, proton boron-11 only emits a few low-energy neutrons and very little radioactivity. And it's directed energy conversion. He kind of forgot to mention that, but it's also literally directed energy freaking conversion. No steam cycle. So, yeah. Um And then he says, "Shown in the next figure is such a vehicle, a collaboration between my company and aerospace students at Saint Louis University." Saint Louis University, you can't troll me. I know who the professor was at Saint Louis University cuz it's my spirit goat, Chad. It's my spirit goat. He comes to me in my dreams and he tells me that I have to reveal hypersonic A neutronic fusion. It's Paul Czysz, Chad. It's Paul Czysz. >> The people killing shutting lights off in the United States. That one of these days, when I have Leik Leik sitting right here in the audience. >> That's Leik Myrabo. Leik Myrabo sitting in the front row, the guy that helped build the laser light sail for producing thrust from a laser. Not a coincidence, by the way, Chad. That's Paul Czysz that we're looking at. Professor at Saint Louis University aerospace legend, also. That's That's who David Froning was working with at St. Louis University. Listen to what he says here. >> It's one of these days we're going to see that flight orbit the NASA microwave powered spacecraft based on plasma propulsion. And one of those right now is flying in the former Soviet Union. I can't >> chat. What the actual F? >> [music] >> If you're just listening and wondering why there's some dead air, I'm staring at an image of a [ __ ] UFO. Like it's a flying saucer I'm staring at with some [ __ ] shooting out of it or something, plasma presumably. And he's going, "Yeah, here's your laser UFO using microwave lasers that we're just we're able to make these now." And the dude's showing it to me on an overhead projector, so this is clearly like the '90s. When I was in elementary school, we had overhead projectors. So, point being, that's who he was working with. The vehicle used inertial electrostatic confinement system conceived by Robert Hirsch and then considerably advanced by Robert who Sward over many years. Now, I'm going to read the the note at the The notes at the bottom of this book are insane. The notes at the bottom of this book are insane. History This is a note from Editor's Note. History has proven Dr. Philo Farnsworth also built and demonstrated an IEC for Bell Labs in the '60s. Most references now credit both with a nomenclature of the Farnsworth-Hirsch fusor. As noted in George Miley's text, inertial electrostatic confinement fusion fundamentals and applications 2013. Now, let me ask you this. All right, here and this is actually relevant to what I'm about to say. He says, "IEC fusion has been identified in recent times as an ideal fusion power unit because of its ability to burn aneutronic fuels like proton-boron 11 as a result of its non-Maxwellian plasma distribution, non-equilibrium plasma distribution, and beam-like ions. The ions act like a beam." This type of fusion also takes place in simple mechanical structures small in size. So, what's the relevance? Think about what they're saying here. Proton-boron 11 fusion is the hardest fusion there is. We publicly haven't even cracked the easiest fusion there is. One of the biggest criticisms I hear and if I were to ever debate a nuclear physicist, they would say, "We haven't even cracked regular fusion yet. How are we going to go for proton-boron 11? That's just a dream." What is the answer, chat? You know what the answer is. They're aiming for the best because they already have a secret password. They already know the cheat code to get to the end boss. The reason why they're not messing around with anything else is cuz they're going straight for the best because they know how to do it. They know how to do it. They're not doing this and just thinking, "Oh, maybe someday in the future people will figure this out." They're going, "We already figured it out. We're going to write down as much as we can that doesn't break classifications." And how are they doing it? I'll explain to you right now. They're saying that this high beta regime that these IEC fusion reactors are creating here that these are creating unusual anomalous conditions, nuclear conditions. What do I mean by that? Specifically, what I mean by that is that they are reducing the Coulomb barrier. You ready to learn a little bit of nuclear physics? If you're watching this, you're going to be able to go to your your loved one, your spouse, maybe just your cat or your dog, and be like, "I learned nuclear physics today." And it'll be true. Coulomb barrier, very simple to understand. We'll try to bring these two ions together, positively charged ions, but they're both positively charged. So, they don't want to go together. They want to stay apart. But, we're going to be like Cupid. We're going to be like Cupid, and we're going to shoot Cupid's arrow at them. We're going to say, "You're going together. You're going to hook up. You're going to hook up and do what we want, make a baby." And so, how do we do that? Well, the simplest way to do that is to reduce the Coulomb barrier. If you change the Coulomb barrier, now you need less energy for them to come together. And you say, "Okay, well, how are you going to do that, Ashton? How are you going to change the Coulomb barrier?" Thank you for asking. David Froning wants to tell you the answer. Long story short, there's an extra dimension. Long story short, we can couple gravity to electromagnetism with torque.