The Classified Component That Separates Nuclear Powers
Summary
The host, Ashton Forbes, analyzes recent statements from Iran regarding its nuclear fusion capabilities and a specific European patent attributed to an Iranian scientist. He argues that Iran's progress demonstrates that fusion is real and that the country possesses advanced knowledge of plasma physics, potentially including quantum energy extraction. Forbes contends that the US government's hostility toward Iran is driven by fear that Iranian scientists could develop dangerous technologies, such as black hole weapons, rather than just atomic bombs.
He uses this geopolitical context to argue that Iran is more technologically advanced than publicly acknowledged.
Forbes then dissects a 2005 European patent for a 'gravitational energy system,' claiming it reveals the 'missing link' in fusion technology. He asserts that the patent correctly identifies the flaws in traditional tokamak reactors, specifically the 'central column syndrome' where physical structures interfere with magnetic fields. He argues that the patent describes a Field-Reversed Configuration (FRC) or similar design where magnetic fields are generated from the inside out, creating a virtual anode/cathode and mimicking the sun's gravitational force.
Forbes concludes that this internal magnetic field generation is the key to achieving sustainable fusion and gravitational manipulation, implying that military and scientific communities have been using incorrect reactor designs for decades.
Key Claims (5)
The US government targets Iran not to stop atomic weapons, but to prevent them from developing fusion-based weapons, including black hole generators, due to their intelligence and understanding of plasma physics.
Evidence: Speaker's analysis of US-Iran relations
A 2005 European patent by an Iranian scientist claims a reactor whose rotating magnetic fields create a "gravitational force phenomena" in plasma. Forbes reads the patent as a recipe for turning a fusion reactor into a gravity-manipulation device.
Evidence: European patent text read by speaker
Traditional tokamak reactors fail due to 'central column syndrome,' where a physical central column prevents proper magnetic field generation and plasma containment.
Evidence: European patent text
The sun's fusion is sustained by a central gravitational force field; man-made reactors fail because they lack a system to create and maintain a gravitational force field to hold plasma.
Evidence: European patent text
Creating a virtual anode and cathode using plasma allows for the creation of a 'miniature sun' with inward gravitational force, enabling fusion without physical central structures.
Evidence: Speaker's interpretation of patent and plasma physics
Video Details
- Published
- September 18, 2026
- Duration
- 14:12
- Views
- 8,092
- Claims Extracted
- 5
- Theories
- 1
- References
- 3
People Mentioned
Full transcript
Show
Iran says it has achieved nuclear fusion knowledge for sustainable energy. Atomic Energy Organization chief Muhammad Elas uh El uh oh man Islami said researchers have moved beyond providing the technology and into testing and simulation capability which officials say could accelerate the path towards practical nuclear fusion energy. Iran also unveiled domestically built technology capable of detecting tiny internal cracks and def and defects in critical industrial equipment. Three smart systems developed by Iran knowledgebased companies and research institutes what that means designed for nuclear oil and gas officials say the technology can compete with foreign alternatives and is ready for export.
Now, you may say, "Hey, Ashton, this is really just kind of baby steps." But yeah, it still shows huge. It shows that fusion is real and everybody knows fusion's real and they're putting money into it. They're shifting into it. You look at China. China has been spending a lot in fusion trying to get ahead of us in fact.
And that's why we, the government, Trump's administration has reacted. So for Iran to come out and say, "Hey, we have a fusion breakthrough. We are, you know, moving ahead with fusion capability and we're getting ready to produce it." I mean, for a a country that we are basically just wiped off the map. I won't say wiped out the map. That's not fair.
Disabled their military capability. For them to be coming out and saying this shows they're very advanced, extremely advanced. And people underestimate Iran's capabilities. When we say we came in to take out their nuclear capabilities, that's almost certainly a misnomer. We don't need to go into Iran and stop them from making an atomic weapon. That's not even like really a risk to us anymore.
We're looking and we're afraid because these people are smart. They understand plasma physics. They certainly can figure out how to extract quantum energy. They should be able to figure out how to make a fusion bomb for sure. That should be nothing. So those are the reasons why we're trying to set them back because eventually this technology that we've been disclosing has the capability, yes, to give us free energy forever, to make a warp drive or a wormhole, but it also has the capability to make a black hole that wipes out the whole planet for sure, maybe even much more than that.
And the problem is when you look at a lot of these people's culture and religion, not all of them, but it only takes one to make a doomsday cult that's going to destroy us all. Look at ISIS. ISIS absolutely, if they had the capability and knowledge, would have made a weapon to destroy us all and would have done it. Would have done it. So, just want to put that in context. Now, I want to add a little more to this because this is just some article, right?
This you're watching chat. This is the Ashton for Orbs. You know, when you come to here, you're coming for a little bit more, a little more than the average bear, not just a random news article. So, how about Thank you, Mr. Wolf, by the way. [clears throat] How about some Iranian uh patents in the in Europe? How about an Iranian scientist patent? This is a patent in Europe.
Let's let's go ahead and read this gravitational energy system. A new method and technology is described to create under c centrial and vacuum conditions in presence of ionized condition. So ionization would be plasma. Centrial forces is spin. vacuum conditions, turbulence, rotation, and compressive and heating of gaseous matter that is created in a reactor by at least one central rotative magnetic field with the purpose of creating plasmonic conditions leading to the creation of various magnetic fields where at least the interaction of two magnetic fields would least create lead to the creation of at least one gravitational force phenomena. on. Okay.
Who said Iran wasn't smart enough to figure out zero point energy? You get to go to the back of the line. Everybody that said Iran was smart enough, everybody that paid attention to Ashton Forbes's live streams that knew that Iran hacked an M an RQ170 drone of ours knows these people are smart. These aren't primitives, chat. Some of these Iranians are very smart. And he basically just described how you can turn a fusion reactor into a gravitational manipulation wave.
In fact, that's almost certainly at least similar to what the ion pumpy thing is doing. Think about what the ion pumpy thing is doing. It's just creating plasma fusion conditions and then turning them into a gravitational force and it uses that to fly around with no inertia. Now I want to read a little more of this. This is going to pay off. In a reactor, embodiment of a chain of energetic events is created via a rotative magnetic induct in initi ignition whatever initiation of basic ionization of gas plasma which uh triggers a controllable chain of energy transfers and these look like monatomic gases.
I think a central column of magnetic means to start the process various gases. Okay, so it talks about the concepts. An important part of research on energy happened since about 1940 when the quest for nuclear power and its control really started. We see that several concepts were developed since then. Some special more performing concepts without the nuclear waste problem are still under development like the tokamac reactors. So they're talking about fusion.
The world of nuclear industry seems to be infatuated by the dream of creating the power of the sun. But a change in the physical design structure of the present reactors is needed because the fusion industry of today has not managed to produce any sustainable and substantial amounts of energy after some 50 years of research and development. The reason for the failure of these reactors is rooted in the following three major miscalculations. Who doubted chat? Who doubted that Iran didn't know how to do fusion? Who said or that Iran knew how to do fusion?
Who said that Iran didn't know how to do fusion? Check. What the hell? That was scary. chat. Did my phone just react to me talking? Wow.
By the way, this right here is absolutely not explaining fusion, but saying that took reactors are not good enough. This is exactly what I've been saying on my life. Maybe this person's been watching us. When was this patent? 2005. Wow.
Miscalculation number one. These reactors all suffer from the central column syndrome. That is to say, they all have a solid body at the middle of the reactor. Chat, you better be paying attention right now because I'm turning you all into fusion experts in a YouTube live stream conducted by a healthc care IT consultant. All true statements. First thing, tokamaxs are no good because in your donut you have a column going right through the middle.
You need nothing to be in the middle. So your fusion reactions can initiate in the center. Fusion took. Anybody trying to do a tokamac is an idiot. Upgrade your design. The reason is you need to be able to facilitate the physical loops of the magnetic coil rings.
So the magnetic fields can be produced and maintained to bring plasma to the right temperature. So what do you do? The fundamental reversal of the laws of physics. If one looks at the magnetic field of the force of nature, the magnetic field is create created and maintained from the center outwards in any star in possession of a fusion core. In these man-made designs, the laws of physics are turned inside out where the magnetic fields are enforced from the outside inward. This is an explanation as why scientists are using so much energy for such a small output.
Damn, you go. They probably already killed this guy, chat. This guy's probably already dead. Our view, the magnetic for uh field has to be created and maintained from the inner part and radiate outward and thus allow for the creation of the second magnetic field force inward that will contain the plasma within the center of the core of the fusion reactor. Do you guys understand what this paper is saying right here? This this patent.
I mean, this is the missing link for your orbs. Ashton Forbes was right. The orbs are fusion reactors. We've been doing fusion wrong this whole time. Probably intentionally. So fusion should be done where the plasma is free floating.
The magnetic fields start from the inside out. There shouldn't be a center column in the middle of your fusion reactor. That's why we can't do fusion. Where's that? And what's that? What's that one guy?
Uh nuclear fsy guy or whatever. Get that [ __ ] fsy guy out here. I want to debate him. I want to take the title of the world's expert in fusion from whoever wants to argue with me about it. Anybody that wants to promote a tokamac reactor basically is who I want to debate. So the magnetic field has to be created and maintained from the inner part radiate out thus allowing the creation okay I already said that I'm an idiot.
Number three, current concepts of fusion production and the maintenance lack a source of gravitational fields to focus towards the center. The secret of the sun is holding together all the elements that can sustain fusion is the essence of its gravitational force. What that means that the center of the sun possesses and maintains a very high level gravitational force field that can hold on to the plasma. The gravity around the center of sun is calculated to be in order of hundreds of thousands of magnitude.
So um even when one asks the men in charge of the latest fusion experiments in the UK, they all report the gravity in the reactor core to be a fraction of the gravitational force on the surface of the earth. This is primarily due to the fact that there is no system devised to create and maintain a gravitational force field to hold the plasma in the reactor core and pull it together. If this was or could be achieved, there would be no need for a large input of current to create a magnetic force field from the outside.
So they claim a method where under centrial and vacuum conditions in the presence of this ionizing condition they are able to create a miniature sun. Okay, that's enough. You guys get the point. >> [snorts] >> So Iran has fusion. We're not the only ones to figure it out. But as you can see, that's not the whole pie there. That's just basically figuring out field reverse configuration, right?
That's them figuring out, oh, we can do fusion with nothing physical at the center of the core. That's the idea of field reverse configuration. You may say, why is this necessary? One important reason, the temperatures get too high when you're trying to do fusion. Anything that's nearby where the fusion's happening is going to melt. So you have to have a virtual anode and cathode. You have to create a virtual situation where there's just more electrons here than over here.
That's what an anode and a cathode is.
Control over the electric force or the electric uh electric field strength. how much negative potential that's why that's why um what's his name Bousard came up with this idea of creating this negative potential in the middle because now we don't need to have a physical anode and cathode now we've created a virtual one using plasma itself and now you've enabled the capability to create a sun create a little miniature sun where all the gravitational force comes inward and you may wonder why is the military all over it why were they researching it well this is why because they that, hey,
what we were doing to get fusion was all wrong. Here's how we do it instead.