FELONY Physics - ER = EPR and Conditioned EM Fields

Video Transcript

Carl Sagan could not have predicted 2021, but he did see it coming. He wrote the following back in 1995, and we quote, "I have a foreboding of an America in my children's or grandchildren's time when the United States is a service and information economy, when nearly all the manufacturing industries have slipped away to other countries, when awesome technological powers are in the hands of a very few, >> [music] >> and no one representing the public interest can even grasp the issues. When the people have lost the ability to set their own agendas or knowledgeably question those in authority, >> [music] >> when clutching our crystals and nervously consulting our horoscopes, our critical [music] faculties in decline, unable to distinguish between what feels good [music] and what's true, we slide almost without noticing back into superstition [music] and darkness. The dumbing down of America is most evident in the slow decay [music] of substantive content in the enormously influential media. The 30-second sound bites now down to 10 seconds or [music] less, lowest common denominator programming, credulous presentations on pseudoscience and [music] superstition, but especially a kind of celebration of ignorance. Roll that around for a while. Those were [music] among his final published words. He died 10 months later. Here we are 25 [music] years later realizing just what he was trying to tell us back then. >> Ashton Kutcher, you know, that super jacked guy. >> Malaysian 370, contact Ho Chi Minh 120.9. Good night. >> Good night, Malaysian 370. >> Breaking news tonight, a Malaysia Airlines flight [music] with 239 people on board, including four Americans, has [music] gone missing. >> Even as these grainy satellite images released today by the Chinese government >> The the Malaysia flight 2 was a was one shot at China saying [music] knock it off. >> Why shoot it down though if it's not hostile? >> Our technologies permit us to manipulate [music] time and space. >> Why the Americans would >> any distance annihilate. >> This country is very powerful. >> [music] >> Far more powerful than people understand. We have weaponry that nobody has any idea what it is and it is the [music] most powerful weapons in the world. Not even close. >> I remember the >> [music] >> lines from the Hindu scriptures, the Bhagavad Gita. >> [music] >> Vishnu is trying to persuade the prince that >> [music] >> he should do his duty. And to impress him takes [music] on his multi-armed form and says "Now I have become death, the destroyer of worlds." >> [music] >> I suppose we all thought that one way or another. >> [music] >> Welcome to the show. You should get excited. You know why you should get excited? Cuz this is the greatest show on Earth. You are watching it unfold in real time. Welcome, guys. First thing I want to say off the bat, you are my legacy. As all of the engineers are, we are their legacy, the ones that we have reviewed. You all are my legacy. I'm realizing as I watch how many people are in the live streams, how many people have been absorbing this content and following along. I realize this really is uh just like V for Vendetta. It's like this is just an idea. If you if you were watching Brian Keating interview Avi Loeb earlier today, there was only like a hundred people in the chat. Chat wasn't even moving. It was literally non-existent. Nobody's even watching that stuff. It's all boomer trash. People want to be invested in something they can make a difference in. And I'm here to tell you you can be a hero, too. My Hero Academia chat. Lots of references tonight. Lots of anime references. Guys, right off the bat, we're going back to the UAP learning group, chat, has been formed. The UAP learning group, the smartest scientists that the government could find have been accumulated. They have been brought together. It's essentially an Independence Day scenario. The aliens are coming for us, and we had to get Will Smith uh we had to get Will Smith together to fight some aliens. I'm pretty sure Tommy Lee Jones is in there somewhere. Anyway, we've got a live look. This is a brand new brand new image from Avi Loeb's first interview. So, Avi Loeb, this is a real photo, by the way, chat. Not altered not digitally altered at all. I'm going to make it bigger just so people can appreciate this photo. I just really love this photo. >> [snorts] >> Avi Loeb has been assigned. He's basically Oppenheimer. He's been assigned Oppenheimer of the alien U Of course, it's UAP science group. And their goal is going to be to tell us which kind of aliens exist. What color are they? Which ones are the hottest? Which ones can integrate with our society? Which ones should we shun because they're ugly or they stink or you know, whatever reasons. Now, to this end the the Avengers as they're calling themselves the derelict Avengers they have been announced. Who is this? Who is this Amazonian? Who is this possibly thick white related to the thick whites? We don't know. It's a mystery. He could be interviewing an alien in this. It could also be that alien is about or Avi is about, yeah, 4 ft 10. Maybe Avi is uh of the elf species. We don't know. This is all just conjecture. Hold on. I need to actually get this off the stage so you can actually see how tiny he is. Incredible. Real photo, by the way. Okay. Now, real talk. That was mostly jokes, but that photo is real. 100% real, chat. Don't worry about Avi, by the way, guys. The guy that has been assigned to figure out aliens for us he did just spend like a whole year trying to convince us that a normal space rock was an alien mothership. Yeah. Then he asked for a billion dollars to I don't know have a bunch of telescopes looking in the sky for aliens. Literally billion dollars. Should we worry about these things? Nope. This is the guy. We're looking for super advanced aliens. Let's uh let's let's put the guy in charge who thinks that rocks are alien mother ships. Wonderful. Genius idea. What I think is funny about this, if I'm honest for a second, is if I was the government and I had a list of people who are literally have no chance of ever getting into the truth, the top two people would probably be Avi Loeb and Neil deGrasse Tyson on the list. And we got Avi Loeb. So, let's see. And oh, by the way, also, I mean, if if you thought those were red flags, and this this might be this might be a red flag, too. He says, if he has to sign a non-disclosure agreement, he would do so because he thinks it's very important type of evidence for the future of humanity. And he doesn't need to broadcast it to the public at large if there are reasons not to do so immediately. You know what? I'll just let let's play the >> I if I have >> Nobody was watching this today, so let's give it some views, guys. >> have to sign a non-disclosure agreement, you know, uh I would do so just because I think it's it's a very important uh type of evidence for the future of humanity. And I don't need to broadcast it to the public at large if if there are reasons not to do it immediately. >> Will there be a budget uh that you are off you don't tell me what it is, but but will there be a budget? Will there be transparency, oversight, governance, etc.? >> No, at this time, uh >> Chat, I don't want to judge too harshly, but you know what? The gloves are off. You know what? Actually, I do want to judge harshly. [ __ ] it. The gloves are absolutely off right now. Forget it. I'm also creeped out by the fact that he can't maintain eye contact. Why can't he maintain eye contact? Where is he looking down here? Is there something going on down here that I need to be looking at? You're a Harvard professor, man. Get a little bit of confidence. If you can't even look me in the eye, how am I supposed to believe you when you tell me aliens are real or whatever other nonsense they're about to try to sell us? The aliens are coming to take over. >> We are an advisory council, uh so uh um my guess based on service on similar in similar committees that the budget includes travel expenses when we meet in person. That's basically it. [clears throat] >> Okay. One thing I will be I stand happy about uh any is that we're not paying for this. I don't mind some travel expenses. We're going to pay them per diem or whatever for this thing. Okay, that's fine. If we're not paying these people salaries, I don't really care that much. In fact, I'm kind of all in on this actually now. You know what, chat? I'm switching sides. I am going to get myself a UAP learning group shirt. In fact, we got to get these made. I wish I had my shirt people. UAP learning group I I am loving this group. I can tell this is exactly what we need. This is how we keep zero-point energy from the dum-dums, chat. I wasn't thinking about the right way. I was thinking my perspective of helping humanity. Dumb. That was so stupid of me. Why would I think of it like that? No, no. We got to remember how many stupid people there are on this planet, right? There's a lot. The UAP learning group is definitely the thing that we're looking at here, that we want to get to make sure that this never comes out. Make sure that the stupid people never blow us all up. Right? That's why we're doing this. So, who's on the group? Let's see. Who are Who Who are the people that are probably like the least qualified people we could come up with. >> [snorts] >> Oh, look. Let's see what we got here. Okay, I'm only going to say the names I recognize, which is like three. Also, shout out to ZPE Disclosure. Guys, follow my boy ZPE Disclosure. Why are you not following him? Also, follow my other moderators, too. If you don't, there's a reason why they're moderators. Gary Nolan Okay. I don't really I just don't like Gary Nolan. I don't think that I think he's hyped up more than and this doesn't have anything to do with my personal or political beliefs against the guy. Nothing against that. I just think this guy's hyped up for no reason whatsoever. He's not a physicist. So, I think the reason why he's beloved in the UFO community is because he's a you know, biologist or whatever. He's into the biology, so he's into the alien biology, neurobiology, neuropathy. I don't know if you remember what his his uh uh focus is, but you get the point. Tim Gallaudet red flag I think he was rear admiral admiral Tim Gallaudet. I have him on record promoting the Newsweek debunk related to MH370. Actually, I wonder if I can pull this up right now on the spot. Uh maybe this one. Let me see. >> disclose the classified information technology-wise that we're learning about UAP. I'm okay with that. We don't want that to go to the American public or to our adversaries. But, the American public has a right to know the new nature of reality we know and and that the the Defense Department and the intelligence community has [clears throat] realized and has evidence of. That's not fair to American public or the global citizens at large. So, I I think this is what has to come out. Let's not Let's not disclose the >> So, what? Hold hold up. >> Let's not disclose the classified information technology-wise that Let's not disclose the classified information technology-wise. Let's not disclose the classified information technology-wise. disclose the classified information technology-wise. >> Sorry, I had to play it like 10 times. If that upset you, I just had to make sure that everybody has heard Tim Gallaudet say, "Let's not disclose the classified information technology-wise." There you go. First person that I even begin to respect on this list. I've got a clips of him saying that he's not going to disclose technology. So, why are you putting this guy Oh, that's why he's on the That's why he's on the committee chat. Next. Actually, we're going to come back to this guy. One of the only ones that I guess doesn't have a PhD cuz he's professor and not doctor. Matthew Seday Sedacus? I don't know. Um Switch over to this. >> [snorts] >> Dr. Michael Shermer. Calling this guy a doctor is the biggest stretch that you could possibly make. Michael Shermer, uh is he like a psychologist or something like that? Uh professor of philosophy or something? >> [laughter] >> Not a doctor in any real sense of the word. Michael Shermer is one of the most outspoken skeptics, but not even just skeptics of the UFO community, just like, you know, if you haven't got 27 vaccines, then you're a play grad that doesn't believe in science kind. Right. So, when you see him on the list, now I'm wondering if this whole thing's not a grift because there's plenty of videos of Avi and Michael Shermer on like Piers Morgan doing the fake good cop bad cop routine. Where one of them says one thing, and then the other one Well, Avi goes, "Oh, it's theoretically possible aliens are real, but we don't know anything about that." And then Michael Shermer goes, "No, aliens aren't even real. It's not possible at all. Boo. Right? So, now this whole thing's feeling like a grift. The other thing I want to say about the Michael Shermer thing, which is going to segue into our next topic before we dig deep into the science. These are the people that deserve to have their lives destroyed. I mean, honestly, it's just going to be a wrecking crew. I'm not going to lie to you guys here. I'm going to keep it real with you. I'm going to keep it 100% real. Keep it from the heart. I'm going to literally destroy every one of these people. I'm going to break their soul. I'm going to break Avi's psyche down to like when he was a little child. And you say, "Ashton, how are you going to do that?" "Isn't that mean? Don't bully Avi. He's such a nice guy." It's not even my fault. It's not even my fault. These people have latched themselves onto a worldview that doesn't exist. Michael Shermer is going to get it harder than the rest. Michael Shermer has spent his whole career grifting, making his all his money peddling his fake expertise so that he can get on shows he doesn't deserve to be on because nobody listens to him. And telling him telling people that he knows science better than other people. As an authority on science. Those people, the best thing those people can do for humanity is die quickly. That's just the hard truth. That's the best thing those people can do for humanity. And I'll tell you exactly why. Because I have proven and will continue to prove that they are actually wrong. That they are the ones that have been wrong their entire lives. And that while they've been saying that free energy is fake and so and literally writing books about voodoo science. Claiming that free energy engineers are pseudo-scientists, people with real degrees that really engineer stuff. Turns out they were the liars, they were the scammers, they were the con artists. And not just once. These people spent their whole careers doing it. Michael Shermer spent his whole career, made an entire brand out of being the professional skeptic. And it turns out he's going to learn 100% there's no way to change this future. This future is written in stone. He's going to learn that he was the grifter. I don't even have to do anything. Except for watch it play out and jab whenever the [ __ ] I want. You know what I've learned about this? I can do whatever the [ __ ] I want now. I have a a free pass to do whatever I want. The CIA gave me the best possible thing. I don't have to go spend my time on podcasts. I can just do my normal job like I did for 12 hours today. And then just lazily get on my show and just talk [ __ ] about all the phony every single fake phony thing I see. Just like how Edward Lynn knew inside information about what's going on because he knew the technology. I don't even want to reveal the videos anymore. It's more fun to just literally know what the future holds from a physics perspective. And be like, "Oh, these people are all just wrong. These people are all just liars. This is going to be proven wrong." And just [ __ ] all over them cuz you already know the truth. And there's nothing they can say. What are they going to do in response? Nothing. Can they Can anybody sue me about the videos about anything I say? No, I've got the truth on my side. It's absolute defense. Truth is an absolute defense against any slander, liable, or defamation. It's beautiful. I love it. One more person We're So, we're basically just going to [ __ ] on everybody all the time now, from now on. And I'm going to destroy this UAP learning group. 100% destroy it. Turn it into a circus. Make it into the clown show that it's always been. And ridicule and embarrass everybody who's involved in it. Why? Because I know it's not going to do anything. I know they're not going to reveal anything. I know anything they put out is going to be subpar and garbage. And so, I'm just going to get out ahead of it. And you know what? That's what they get. That's what they deserve. So, let's destroy another one of them right now. This guy probably doesn't even deserve this, and he's going to get it harder than the rest. The last one on the list, my boy here. Matthew Sedagos. Thank you. Shout out. We got to give some props out here to Joe Muria Murgia. Shout out Joe Murgia. Guy hates my guts. I don't care. The other thing you're going to learn about me, chat, I don't care. I love it even more if you hate me, and then I promote you. That's I love that [ __ ] chat. That's how much I don't give an F. You know what I like about Joe, even though he's got full TDS, like many of the rest? Is cuz he pulls all he saves all these old think clips, obscurest things that nobody else has. And sure enough, he could he immediately pulls up, "Oh, I've got a clip of this guy talking with Eric Davis." Uh excuse me, what? What did you say you have? You have a clip of one of the people on our new learning group talking with Eric Davis, the world's leading expert on wormholes? [ __ ] Chad, do I have popcorn? Do I cuz I don't even know who this guy is and apparently we're going to find out how he stacks up to Eric Davis right now. Are you guys ready? Are you guys ready to find out how this guy stacks up to Eric Davis? By the way, there's like only maybe two people in this world I'm afraid to to go across the mic from and one of them's Eric Davis. Which is kind of funny because he might be more afraid of me than I am of him. But I'm afraid of him because he knows everything. There's nothing I could not I never ever could win a debate in physics against him or Hal Puthoff or those guys. This guy though. So, I would be terrified. Let's see what his attitude is like. I chat I can't even I can't even hold back how horribly this is about to go. >> [laughter] >> I'm giddy like a schoolgirl right now, Chad. I'm skiddy I'm giddy like a schoolgirl. >> the remote possibility of backwards time travel. >> Oh, please please. I want to savor it for another moment. Uh, hold on. We're going to let this play out. >> [snorts] >> I think I'd like to take I'd like to take this one since I have a TED Talk on it, which I'm very proud to say has probably as as much views as as many as as as people much more famous than me. >> Holy [ __ ] I'm >> [laughter] >> Are you kidding me right now? Okay. So, first question is backwards time travel. That's definitely a wormhole territory question. Excuse me, I'd like to take this here a question. Cuz I have a TED Talk that I did and uh yeah, it's got more it's got a lot of views on it. Oh my god, you uh woo. Well, well, this better be good, I guess. Dazzle me about wormholes. Teach me something I had never knew about wormholes. I'm I'm really excited to know. Here we go. Since you're the expert, boss, go for it. >> Um but yeah, this is one of my pet topics even though I don't actively I don't I don't research it. I know >> Oh, I was just like I do a lot of things. I'm just I'm an expert on this on the side. Yeah, oh yeah, okay. This is some Redditor Redditor type [ __ ] right here. >> [laughter] >> Redditor type patient zero type [ __ ] right here. >> People who do like Ronald Mallett, I think from what from what I've I've looked into, I know we have Michael Masters here who will disagree. I know he's got his his his hypothesis that we're dealing with time travelers, but I think that it's very unlikely because we don't know what we do know is that to to time travel to the past would require some form of negative energy or exotic material, the same thing you'd need to hold a wormhole open. The problem is that it's not just that we don't know where to get such material. We don't even know if it exists. >> Dude, dude. Okay, what are you talking about, man? The question was about backwards time travel. Imagine if I get asked about backwards time travel. I'm like I don't even know if we can make negative energy. Chat, and if you somehow just randomed onto this live stream and you're like, who is this guy ranting? What's he ranting about? Negative energy is not an exotic substance. It's inherently connected to zero-point energy because we live in this ocean of energy and negative energy is just going down in that ocean. That's how simple it is. But people like this think of it in terms of it's a Harry Potter substance I saw in a Marvel movie one time. And that's insane if you're claiming to be an expert on zero or on on wormholes. You're going to be an expert on this, but you don't even understand what negative energy is, can't explain it, and thinks it doesn't even exist? That's what you just Those are the words that just came out of your mouth. >> Other than tiny fractions of a second [snorts] as virtual particles, as quantum fluctuations, and so I think >> Now, in fairness, he kind of tried to rescue himself there and go, "Well, maybe virtual particles might be linked to negative energy." Right? Which is exactly what it is. They call zero-point energy virtual particles cuz they're they're idiots. They're idiots. Virtual particles are very real. They call things that they don't understand names that are weird because they don't get it, right? Same thing with dark energy, dark matter. These things don't exist. The only thing that exists is a lack of understanding of the universe. That's what exists in their heads. They don't understand that they're missing a big piece of the pie. And this is why it's so off-putting when they try to tell you how much they know about the universe. And they want to try to tell you how it really works. I don't have a problem with somebody if they just don't know and they're just living their life cuz we all don't know a lot of stuff in this world. But when people really don't know [ __ ] and then they pretend to be experts or they make [ __ ] meters and they tell other people their shit's [ __ ] and they make a whole career of debunking or claiming other people's stuff's [ __ ] Well, that's when you deserve to have that come back at you. Cuz the reality is you deserve to be treated how you treat other people. And part of the reason why I treat people like [ __ ] is cuz it's exactly that. You'll notice that when people treat me nicely, I'm always nice to them. Anyway, let's keep going. >> There are a lot of obstacles, a lot of challenges to overcome um in order to make time travel to the past if that would be a a reality. Now, in my in my opinion, but it's again opinion, not fact, just my opinion, far removed from this, I don't work on them myself. In my opinion, I think it'd be much easier to envision um signaling of the past, a kind of time telephone, is a lot more realistic >> So, it's like Hey, there's challenges. Okay, what are they? You just told me you don't know what negative energy is and then it might not even be real. And now you're like, well, there's a lot of challenges. Okay. Anybody can say this. This doesn't This isn't any detail whatsoever. This is why I like the real engineers. And this is why the first thing I do is read the papers myself. Otherwise, you just sound like an idiot. You're like, uh well, in my opinion, it's very difficult and you can't really do it. Well, great job, Cletus. Good input. Go sit Go sit back in the corner. Put the hat on again. Go eat the paste again. >> opinion than a occupant in a machine, you know, like H. G. Wells, I think is that's a lot more difficult. >> It's like, oh. Uh I think you might be able to signaling. Okay, well, signaling is like literally sending time information to the past. You're like, oh, I think we can do that. but like scaling it up is like more difficult. Yeah, duh. That's the whole point. We know quantum entanglement exists. That's not the problem. The problem is how do you control it and how do you scale it up? And you want to know something fun about that Ash chat? Talk to myself here. Conditioned electromagnetic fields is the answer. What you're looking for there is how do we manipulate gravity? How do we manipulate gravity? Well, first thing is we have to understand there's an extra dimension. We have to understand that we can interact with those virtual particles. And in some cases strongly and in other cases weakly, which is why we don't see it all the time. And when we understand that, then we can begin to engineer the vacuum, as they say. Anyway, let's keep going here. >> I do think we need to keep an open mind because scientists and engineers used to think air travel was a joke, that space travel was impossible. Right, Kevin, who's right here, often quotes the famous astronomers 2 weeks before Sputnik saying that space travel is impossible. So, I want to be cautiously optimistic, but with our current understanding of physics, it looks like it would be extremely extremely difficult. Um I do want to be optimistic because I wouldn't want nothing more than for time travel to What is >> Okay, next, don't worry, it's going to get even better here. Now, before I go to the next part >> a reality, it's >> He does He also does the meme of I would I would love for it to be real. It's too bad it isn't. I would just love it though. I That's my favorite meme to play chat on people. That's my new one when I'm trolling people because when you are a total fraud you first thing you do is you go, "Well, this is just my opinion, but it would be difficult." And you don't ever explain anything about how any of it works. And then at the end though you go, "And I'm not against it though. I would love for it to be real though." You know, it's like, "Well, you didn't really provide anything other than just like the rest of us you wish it to be real and now we're not any closer to understanding how it could be real. Right? >> Oh. >> You're a professor? I mean, you need to work on your teaching skills. Is that how you teach your kids? Then they're just basically you're just teaching them your opinions. You're not teaching them how anything works. Here's the follow-up. >> nothing more than for time travel to be to be a reality. It's one of the crazy ideas that got me interested in becoming a physicist, but right now it's just there's so many levels of impossible you'd have to get through that I just don't I don't see how we or another civilization even could could get there. But >> By the way, statement of fact, the United States government was teleporting airplanes in 2014. This was recorded, I don't know, at most probably six or seven years ago. At the time this guy recorded this statement saying there are multiple things that make it literally impossible, the government had already been doing it. This is the person that you are pinning your hopes on to figure out aliens and UFOs. The whole Dare Leaked Avengers learning group, none of them have any hope whatsoever ever figuring this out. It's a misfit cast of losers who have no chance of ever understanding this stuff. And Eric Davis is about to literally rip this man's soul directly from his body. Like Shang Tsung. So, watch closely. It's amazing. >> But again, I I don't want to be a Debbie Downer. I do want to be cautiously optimistic. >> Richard Can I interject here? This is Eric Davis. >> Go ahead, Eric. >> Uh Matt, that was good, but most of what you said was practically incorrect. Uh the uh solution for traverse >> Where is the chat? Oh man, I Boom! Got you, [ __ ] >> the wormholes that was published by Kip Thorne and co-authors back in 1988, 1989, and uh by Matt Visser for the next following 20-plus decades or two-plus decades, uh demonstrated the proof for principle from general relativity that backward time travel is possible. However, you're limited only in going backwards in time to the point at which you turn the time machine on. You can't go further back than that. Secondly, exotic matters already created in the laboratory. It's called the Casimir vacuum energy. It's also called squeeze light states which have alternating pulses of negative vacuum energy density. And we also have proof from Matt Visser's paper in um uh early 1990s in Science magazine that uh he demonstrated that the present-day values of the cosmological parameters can only be possible uh if there is exotic matter somewhere in the universe. And he presented a physics and uh mathematical proof of that. Uh exotic matter is basically called subvacuum fluctuations or uh suppressed energy fluctuations, uh vacuum energy fluctuations due to boundary conditions on the vacuum. And that boundary condition can be the two parallel walls of a Casimir cavity, or they could be, uh, an externally applied electric or magnetic field of some sort, or a gravitational field that acts on, uh, a finite region of the quantum vacuum. And what that does is that, uh, external boundary condition can reshape the vacuum fluctuation so that they polarize >> Okay. Wow. Absolute We got to just let him finish there. Absolutely finishes him. Fatality. There's That's a GG no re right there. I mean, made him look like a little little child, honestly, in comparison. It's embarrassing. Comes in and just says, straight up, you're wrong about everything. Matt Visser shows you can go backwards in time. There is negative energy. We've already proven it and produced it in the lab. It's called squeeze states of light. You can produce this negative energy. We can go possibly back in time. We can produce a traversable wormhole. It's like, wow, dude. Wow. That's the difference between a Redditor that has almost a million views on a TED Talk versus the world's leading expert on wormholes. Right? It's no contest. And now do you wonder like do you want to know? I'll just say that's the reason why nobody will debate me. That right there, what you just heard, is the reason why nobody will debate me. Nobody wants to get sound bit like that. Cuz that's a career ender right there. That right there is a career ender. It's hard to go around and say you're an expert at wormholes when you just got bodied in a clip harder than I've ever heard anybody get bodied in my whole life. I mean, it just goes to show you're just not read up. You're not well researched, and you're just pretending. Right? Cuz what Why can't you know about Matt Visser's work? Why can't you know about squeeze states of light? Why can't you know about any of these things? And this is why This is why it's so easy to expose these people. If you were to boil it down to one thing, they don't read. They just pretend. They don't read. They don't read any of these papers. They're not trying to figure out how this all works. For them, it's just like, you know, something they maybe do one Saturday. He read a paper once, and now he's an expert. Crazy, man. Now, >> [snorts] >> this also goes to the next topic. So, if you're if you're hoping for disclosure from the UAP learning group, I mean, that's the reason why Eric Davis is the whistleblower, and why Avi Loeb is trying to shut him down in the middle of the hearings when he's talking on negative energy. Avi Loeb shut him down in the middle of that. Last year, last spring, I think it was in May. Eric Davis explained squeeze states of light and how to produce negative energy. Avi Loeb comes on the mic and goes, "Yeah, but we don't know how any of this works, how to make this." Like, what are you doing, dude? Gatekeeper powers times a thousand. Now, the reason why these people are so afraid, and they should be afraid. They should be terrified disclosure. Anybody that has been spent a career, made money trying to tear other people down. That includes people that have made videos trying to claim that people are scammers. This includes people that have been testifying for the government against people that made over unity devices, free energy devices. Those people should be terrified of disclosure. They should be terrified of me. One of those guys' names is Dave Jones, for example. This is a guy I gave a bunch of people opportunities to test an over unity device magnetic motor device. And because I stepped into the NDA trap once upon a time, I can't talk about it much more than that. But what I can say is it's real. I always was real. None of them wanted to look at it or test it. And what I find out about these guys is they have careers debunking these types of concepts. And now that I'm a person that watched a plane get teleported on this out of the sky and realized from this that free energy has to be real. Not maybe is real. This video means free energy must be real. That's what this video means. From realizing that, I realized, "Oh, wow, a lot of these people out here are straight-up scammers and grifters themselves. No question, no doubt." One of the early ones I found from just looking at random over over unity and free energy concepts was a guy named Robert Park out of University of Maryland. I'm going to actually pull his photo up. He deserves to have his photo be known to people in the world. And the reason why I found him is that he would literally go on the record in court cases and testify for the government against anybody that was trying to sell an over unity device and claim that they're a scammer. If you can't believe that, sorry, that's how the world works. So, if I'm going to I'm going to state this 100% factually as I understand it. Here's his picture, by the way. Uh He looks exactly as you imagine. Uh okay, let me make this bigger. Hold on. He would testify. The government usually I think pays you to testify several thousand dollars to testify in these court cases because it takes time and money to do this. And he would testify for them that anyone that was promoting a free energy device was a scammer and then they would literally either be criminal or or civil penalties against them. And I found a guy that he did this to. Uh it was I can't remember the guy's name. Something Lee I think his name was but he went entirely across the country showing overunity devices demonstrating them. And this guy came in. Now, why am I bringing him up now? Well, he came up again. Chat. He came up again. >> In 1999 you tried to have a free energy conference. What happened? Oh my goodness. Well, it turns out I was at the patent office. I was employed as a patent examiner and I essentially was invited by a friend of mine at the State Department US State Department Open Forum. >> Right. >> And it was great because I actually titled it conference on free energy. And thought, oh this is is a great chance to finally bring it out. It's been you know decades actually two decades since I pursued free energy. I thought the time was right. Turns out it was totally wrong. >> You were right about the timing. They thought you were wrong, right? >> Exactly. >> [laughter] >> What did they do? >> Oh my goodness. Well, first of all the American Physical Society pounced on me every week by calling it a cold fusion conference. I only had one cold fusion speaker [clears throat] out of >> Now, this is crazy. This is Tom Valone. Chat. This is the editor of Faster Than Light. Tom Valone, right there. And he's telling the story of what happened at the Patent Office. Now, how do I have this? Because I'm staring at a flash drive on my computer right now that has all of Tom Valone's life work and media appearances on it, and I'm very good at what I do, chat. So, I was watching this, and this part stuck out to me. I went, "Wow, this is how you lost your job at the Patent Office as an examiner? Because you were realizing that free energy was real, and you just wanted to do a conference? Like, you got invited to do a conference You got invited to do one of the first free energy conferences." And you would say, "Well, what's the big deal with that? Like, anybody can do whatever the hell they want to do." Why would anybody even protest this? Well, here we go. >> local society pounced on me every week by calling the cold fusion conference. I only had one cold fusion speaker out of 14 presenters on new renewable energy and and and invented patented energy. So, it turns out the Dr. Zimmerman, who was the only physicist at the State Department, became my nemesis along with Dr. Park, who was from the University of Maryland, the Public Relations Department. >> What? Did you just hear whose name he just said? He said Dr. Peter Zimmerman at the State Department and Dr. Robert Park at University of Maryland became his nemesis. I heard this, and holy [ __ ] chat. Kill Bill was ready to go. Oh my god, chat. Chat, I am I am praying to God that somebody wants to be Robert Parks champion or Peter Zimmerman's champion. Anybody out there. Isn't there any debunker that wants to honor their their respected friend and colleague? I'm calling your buddy's dog [ __ ] Peter Zimmerman's a piece of dog [ __ ] that I wouldn't even I would avoid stepping on. I'd say, "Honey, get away from me. It stinks like [ __ ] and it's useless." Robert Park? He's lower than that. Robert Park's down in hell right now being tortured where he belongs for the rest of eternity for being a useless piece of garbage. I'm going to piss on their graves. I promise you that. I'm going to record it, make sure you guys see it as well. It's probably That's probably criminal. Doesn't anybody want to defend them? Nobody wants to step in the ring and defend their buddies? Is this all a bunch of [ __ ] cowards? Holy [ __ ] I'm going to ruin these people's their whole legacy. I don't even know if they have Oh, they probably don't have much, but whatever there is to destroy, I'm going to destroy it. These people deserve everything coming to them. And if anything happens to me, what I want you all to know, this is my living will, you should bully all of these people until the day they die. Harder than I'm bullying them now. You have a free pass as if this was COVID and they're not wearing masks out in public. Chat, they're not wearing masks out in public. Are they [ __ ] plague rats? I think they're plague rats, chat. You have a free pass to just ridicule and humiliate these plague rats for the rest of their goddamn lives. Why? Because they did it to other people and they deserve it back to them. That's the reason. >> And and invented patented energy. So, it turns out the Dr. Zimmerman, who was the only physicist of the State Department, became my nemesis along with Dr. Park, who was from the University of Maryland, the public relations department. And the two of them were just too much for the Patent Office, the Department of Commerce, and the Department of Energy. So, it literally then became a media frenzy with the Nature magazine article, Science magazine article, APS News, Village Voice. They all basically told my story of, you know, this patent examiner is trying to do something, but it's totally unscientific and, quote, pseudo science. So, I got fired from the Patent Office. >> From that? >> From misrepresentation and conflict of interest. But that was laughable at the time now, but back then it was traumatic. >> Bro, it's not laughable. How is that laughable to him? Bro, I'm ready to go full John Wick out here. Son, I'm ready to go full John Wick like my dog just got killed. Like they just took Lulu from me. My dude's laughing out here. Traumatic at the time? They destroyed your life because you wanted to do a free energy conference. They misrepresented everything about it. They made it You had credentialed PhD engineers that were presenters. I've got the videos. I've got all of the all the free energy conference videos on my computer right now. Chat. No one even called my bluff. It doesn't even [ __ ] matter. I'm pulling it up anyway. I'm pulling it up anyway. >> [snorts] [clears throat] >> Chat, here you go. Get to see my file structures, chat. Will any other streamers do this, chat? Are any other streamers brave enough? No, cuz they get caught with sketchy [ __ ] Look at this. C O F E 1 Boom. Conference on free energy proceedings. Fire from water trailer. Are you kidding me? Oh, [ __ ] Are you kidding? Were they This is the cover-up of free energy? Holy [ __ ] Oh, was it Wait. That's uh What's this face? The free energy dude. Um They got killed. I'm struggling with the names. Okay, so we're not going to go over this right now. But you get the point. So, Tom Valone, one more thing I want to go over on this. I asked him a message or I sent him email and asked about this, cuz I wanted to make sure that I was understanding the context of this. I can't understand how he could have been so chill about this. And I'm like, "So, you know, what's the deal here? Who do you you know?" And I didn't even ask that much. He's happy to talk about this. It seems like he was famous over this from like 20 years ago. And he sends me back a link. Where is it? Here it is. >> [clears throat] >> Right here. I'll post a link in the chat right now for you guys, so you know, you can you can check it out yourself. In fact, I It's so long. I didn't have time, guys. I I I don't have time for everything in this world. I wish I did. Here it is. There's the link. Pretty easy link. He sends me a link to this and he says somebody dug deep through the arbiter's ruling on this. And if you read through the ruling, it's even more suspicious, in my opinion, than it was first made out to be and even more personal. So, now that actually now that I look at this, I'm just going to go to the short the short parts here. Oh, is that it? Oh, here it is. I think this is it. Um It's I'm just going to read this here. It says, "Is it as simple as as that? Uh the federal government's budget pie for research and development areas of theoretical physics and chemistry is limited and by and large only traditional physicists represent by organizations like APS and its counterparts for conventional chemists have been invited to set up on that pie. The last thing they want is any new guests invited to table." Um Oh, wait. Sorry. No, I'm reading the wrong part. This is why I took screenshots. One sec, guys. My bad. Here we go. Okay, I'm just going to pull up these screenshots I took. But basically, he just wanted to set this up. They ruined his life and uh it was really minor. Like, there's no reason for them to even go after him. Oh, here's the notes. I had it ready to go. >> [snorts] >> He says, "March 1st, 1999. Corazon Foley, the State Department director of the Open forum sent a final memorandum of understanding with the grievance detailed the grievance is I believe Tom Valone with the details of the program and security procedures for the attendees. By that date the grievance had also lined up a co-sponsored to underwrite some of the costs. So basically they are paying for the meals or the drinks. Then the troubles began. The nature of the COFE, the conference on free energy and the State Department sponsorship came to the notice of Dr. Peter Zimmerman. A high-ranking science member of the State Department's Arms Control Agency. So a guy that's in the State Department's Arms and Control Agency gets with there's going to be a free energy conference and suddenly he makes it his life mission to make sure it doesn't happen. Now right off the bat is that not weird? Why is there a guy who is made it his life's mission to make sure there's no conference occurs. Uh Sorry. So then he says who adamantly opposes as unworkable any technology that claims it produced an energy output in excess of the energy input and had a close colleague of Dr. Robert Park. Boom. So now we're realizing it wasn't just one person. Robert Park wasn't just the guy. He was being directed by his buddy Peter Zimmerman. These guys were literally on the government's payroll actively suppressing, ruining people's lives, getting them fired from their jobs just for being interested in free energy. Just for being interested in it. Guy didn't even build anything. Okay. Dr. Zimmerman protested the Open Forum's invitation to the grievance and it's allowing him to put together a cast of renowned pseudo-scientists, quote unquote, to appear under the banner of the Department of State to promote junk science. Wow. Wow. This is literally the clergy burning Galileo at the stake right here. This is literally just every anti-science fault being repeated throughout history once again. People like this literally should not be allowed to exist on this Earth. If your viewpoint is if you don't believe what I believe, you should be shut down, you should be fired, you shouldn't be allowed to do anything, then you shouldn't be allowed to do anything, then you shouldn't be allowed to exist. That's the first That should be the first rule. If your viewpoint is so closed-minded that no other viewpoints can fit in, then you don't get to have a viewpoint. Not other people, you. And it's funny this is why I like this why I like this perspective is when you look at it like that, it forces people to re-evaluate their own behaviors. And most can't do it. Most simply are not capable of doing it because they're not really conscious at all. People like Peter Zimmerman, people like Robert Park, they're not really conscious. What's really going on here is they're afraid. They're afraid. They made their whole careers off of being frauds. Every penny they ever made was fraudulent. No different than the Somali scammers defrauding the government. No different. Exactly the same. They just did it under an official title. That was the only difference. Every penny they made was fraudulent. And every person they attacked was a victim. Truthfully a victim. And I hope in the future that when this finally comes out that this there is free energy and that those people simply weren't able to see it, weren't able to see the reality of it. I hope that the states of these people can sue those people's estates and take everything that their their family has. Because that should be the just reward here. Should be that guy's family everything he ever earned should get taken from them. And it should be given to the people whose lives and families that he destroyed. That's how we rectify this situation. >> [clears throat] >> Not to go on a too much of a tan Oh, actually no, I don't want to go on a tan I want to keep it straight here. Let's keep going. Not done yet. So he also attacked them as pseudo scientists. So he didn't just go after uh Tom Valone. He's going after everybody who was attending the conference. Um he immediately demanded that only the speakers who who have presentations had re had peer-reviewed and approval would be allowed to appear. So he comes out and he demands that every person who presents has to have peer-reviewed papers and they have to be approved by him personally. How insane is this? How mentally ill do you have to be to have think that you have that much control over other people and how they think? That's literally mental illness. Like that is woke mental illness. That's no different than demanding people call you like different pronouns, right? That's the exact same [ __ ] This is This guy was a a transvestite a tran whatever a transgender whatever. This guy was a transgender before transgenders exist. He's trans science. Basically. He's saying, "Hey, you have to believe what I believe, otherwise you're not allowed to talk." And we're not even we're talking on science and physics here. This isn't even supposed to be political. So, he says, "You have to do all this." Of course, was to serve to throw a monkey wrench in the whole concept, which was to serve as a not a form for non-conventional ideas. The whole point was that people who don't come from a, you know, credentialed academic back-background should be allowed to speak cuz we're looking for new ideas. But whatever, right? Nevertheless, the grievant spent the next week attempting to satisfy Zimmerman's demands by providing the published works and other writings of THE SPEAKERS. WHAT? DUDE, Tom Malone is way too nice, dude. Somebody does this to me, I'm crashing out on them. It's war. Bro, you come at me like this, you're coming at That's that's hostile intent. This is war if you come at me like this. He's like, "Hey, here's all the published papers they all did." Like, "Yeah, here they are. Here you go." This is like the villain in a Disney movie. He's like, he's making Cinderella What's her face? Cinderella do all the work and then he's trying to take the credit. What is this? It says, "However, Zimmerman and Park were determined that the State Department's invitation be withdrawn." So, even after he did what they asked, even after Tom Malone did what they asked, they still shut it They still tried to get it shut down. Four days later, Zimmerman had made his demands on the grievant, and while the grievant was scurrying to comply, Park in his March 12th, 1999 newsletter, What's New, trumpeted free energy The first international conference on free energy will not be held on auspices of the State Department. Holy [ __ ] What an absolute total irredeemable piece of [ __ ] Is this Jimmy Kimmel's dad? This is guy Peter Zimmerman must be Jimmy Kimmel's dad. To be this much of a piece of [ __ ] that's the only thing that makes sense. So, not only does he get what he gets asked for, still shut it down anyway, but then he goes and in his newsletter grifts off of it and brags about how he shut it down. Well, actually I'm not it's not even clear if it was even shut down at this point. He just declared it shut down. Just declares it shut down as IF HE'S I DECLARE BANKRUPTCY. I wish this guy was alive right now. I would bully this guy literally to death right now today if he was still alive. This would be his last day today would be his last day on Earth if he was still alive right now. I'd give the dude a heart attack through the internet. No question, no doubt. It'd be his last day on Earth. Unbelievable. >> [clears throat] >> March 25th, 1999 Zimmerman sends an email to an unknown addressee. Where his names are where where his initials are Robert Park. >> [laughter] >> Where his initials Robert Park chat? Oh, the shame of it all. How dastardly we are to the poor grievance. He and his Aussie friend are are and it's all our fault. How can they ever forgive us? How can we ever cleanse our souls of this black mark? What the [ __ ] chat? Please. Please, God in heaven, let there be someone that wants to defend either of these guys. Can you imagine me in a debate doing the voice I just did of that real email? That's a real email between Peter Zimmerman and presumably his gay lover Robert Park. That I mean that's absolute proof he was a homosexual. I don't mean this in a derogatory way, but no man has ever spoken to another man like that and not been homosexual before. It's just a statement of fact. Holy crap. Have you guys I mean, tell me if I'm wrong. Have you ever sent an email like that to another man before? And been straight? No, of course not. Nobody sends an email like that. That's that's some psychopathic [ __ ] right there. That's actually psychopathic. And you want to know the crazy part? His Aussie friend I don't know this, but I guess we're going to find out. I think David Froning is from Australia. If that's David Froning, there's going to be a full crash out stream in the future. If that if they're referring to David Froning, then chat, strap me up. Strap me up, chat, cuz we're going to war. We're going to war. John Wick's going to war if that's David Froning. Okay, let's keep going. I let me I you know what? I got to read it one more time. Just for my own enjoyment, let me read it one more time. Let me practice the voice. >> [clears throat] >> Oh, the shame of it all. How dastardly we were to the poor Tom Malone. He and his Aussie friend are so embarrassed. It's all our fault. How will they ever forgive us? How can we ever cleanse our souls of this black mark? That was the one. Shot. That was the one. Should have done it full screen. That would have been the clip. Wow. Seeing the writing on the wall, the grievance stopped uh uh scurrying about in attempts to satisfy Zimmerman and turned to scurry to find an alternative venue. So, basically, he finally realizes they're never going to let him do the conference no matter what, and he basically has to basically do the whole conference over at the last second. Screws him over in every possible way that he can. Now, you can't even get the State Department to pay for your lemonade that you were going to do before. You were literally just looking for a room that people can talk in. This is the most petty [ __ ] I've ever seen. They're asking for nothing here except for a room to talk in, and you won't even give them that. By the way, they literally [ __ ] covered up free energy. Eugene Mallove was the name I was looking for, and if Eugene Mallove was a speaker, won't surprise me since I saw Fire from Ice there. They literally covered up free energy. So, the reason why they were probably really against this conference was because they had covered up free energy, and they were terrified of it getting out. That's why they had to cover this up. That's why they had to make this go away. Because they were literally criminals who had covered up real science, and now people are starting to figure it out. People are starting to talk about it. And if people start to talk about it, it's game over for you. And now, notice these guys are dead today. They're both dead today. And that's what these people are all doing. That's the same thing that's going on in the UFO community. They are waiting out the clock. They know they've been lying and they've been lying for a long ass time and they have no no intention of telling the truth ever as long as they live. Hal Puthoff admitted it. Hal Puthoff said he is taking his secrets to the soul. He is never telling you guys the truth about what he did. So get it out of your head that he's going to do that. It's not going to happen. You're never getting disclosure from those people. Never. You have to do it yourself or not at all. That's how it's going to go down, chat. So finally, he figures it out he's getting played and he says a sympathetic acquaintance in the Department of Energy started the process of getting DOE facilities available, but as those efforts were on the verge of bearing fruit, Park and/or Zimmerman got wind of the potential arrangement and promptly intervened with their own DOE acquaintance, more highly placed than the grievance. The upshot was that the DOE space was also torpedoed. So they actively destroyed the conference, destroyed even when they tried to get help in the back, they went behind the scenes and were even more evil and still shut it down. Hey, can we have a skate park? Nope, fill it with sand. Why? Just to be evil? Yep, just to be evil. They were filling skate parks with sand during COVID. Why? Just to not allow kids to be outside? Yep. It's just sometimes I think when people are evil, they don't even see how evil they are. And this is another reason why they have to be brutally bullied into self-harm. The only way these people will see how evil they are is when you treat them the way they treat them other people. Then they see how bad it is. Then they get offended. Then they go, "Oh, you're so mean. Oh, why are you so mean and so unfair?" You go, "You are so mean. You are I'm just holding a mirror up to you, man." The reason why you hate it is cuz you're a terrible [ __ ] person and you always have been. Please, find the nearest bridge, the tallest one you can. See if you can fly. The sooner you get off the planet, the better for the rest of us. Okay. >> [sighs] >> Let's dig into some science. Actually, chat, it's not going to get better now. I'm realizing. Now I see what's on deck. It's not getting better, chat. Ooh. >> [sighs] >> Sabine, Sabine, Sabine. Okay, you know what? Let's do something Let's Let's show a quick video that's not It's a little more down-to-earth. Okay. Wormholes. I found a dope video. Somebody actually shared it with me. I didn't really find it, guys. of wormholes and how space portals work. >> folds into a flat >> So, some European guy, dude, some random European guy on YouTube is always the best science [ __ ] you can find, chat. You find some random dude with a thick accent, you know you're about to get like some dude spent He's like in Russia in like a tiny apartment and he probably spent like 200 hours coding some program to get us like 30-second clip of this wormhole thing. You know? And you just got to appreciate the hell out of them, honestly, and I do. So, I just want them to know that. Here we go. >> Torus unfolds into a flat sheet of space. A torus has such a structure that in the flat version, the right side leads to the left and the top leads to bottom. You could say this works just like portals and this portals create this shape in the form of a torus. So, what would the shape of a space look like for our portals? To show this, I wrote an entirely new program capable of simulating this curvature of space. >> So, he says, "Okay. If we see this, if our eyes show us this, which is impossible, right? You can't have something half over here and half on the other side. You can't have something half up here and half down here. Then what does this mean space is shaped as?" Right? And so, his program basically takes these objects that we see and it converts it into its spatial orientation. Now, this is beautiful because when you're trying to understand a wormhole, this is exactly what you need to understand. Why is it even called a wormhole? It's called a wormhole cuz you're going to see a hole right where the space begins to suck inward. Ready? Here we go. >> For example, this is how a flat torus looks in it. We see that the blue square teleports between top and bottom. While the green square teleports between the right and left edges. My program glues left to right and top to bottom. Then it runs a simulation to which shape this will lead to. It moves in a funny way and converges to a torus. With this torus, both squares end up continuous. Next, let's take this >> Interesting how it converts into a torus. >> tin on a plane. Here we have a two-sided portal. The blue square tele >> So now, why is this relevant? What is the shape of our universe? I think most people would say our universe is flat, but as we just saw right there, you can take a flat surface and if you fold it, you can create a torus where there's no end, where you just loop around forever. In theory In theory, where if I go off the side over here, I just appear over on this side. Right? Whoop. Whoop. Just like that. Whoop. So, I think that our universe is probably infinite in the same way. That our universe is a self-contained shape where if you go out one side, you end in the other. >> teleports and moves in a circle, while the green one simply teleports. In this simulation, this part of the portal is glued to another part. I start the simulation >> And this is relevant here. If I go back to this because this is how our MH370 portal works. When we're watching our plane get teleported, you can imagine the three orbs are created in one side of this, like the the orange slide slide here. And they're creating a slice, although this slice is a bubble, and that bubble is going to be connected to the other side. Now, the difference here, the key difference, and there's probably a name for this kind of wormhole. I just call it one-way. This is a one-way travel. That portal is not staying open. That portal is opening and closing, and that plane comes out the other side when it opens up on the other side. Like instantaneously from the perspective of the plane. So, you're not going back in the other way. Now, I don't know what that means and the implications of all the wormhole possibilities, but I just heard Eric Davis say you can go back in time in a wormhole, so I'm pretty much leaving all the options open on the table. >> simulation, this part of the portal is glued to another part. I start the simulation and it converges to this shape. As we can see, the green square doesn't appear to teleport at all. And if you rotate the view, we can see a cylindrical surface in the back, and the blue square moves in a circle within it. And when viewed from this angle, it resembles a visual representation of a wormhole. >> Boom. Now, did you hear what he just said? This is the most important part. I still remember when Jeremy Reese said, "How do you know it's not invisibility? How do you know it's not cloaking instead of teleportation?" And I said, "Well, technically, teleportation is an advanced form of cloaking. Technically, it is kind of cloaking. Not only are they displacing the object from space-time, but from that object's perspective, the object's just going through through a hole. It's not actually that the plane is delocating from one space and point in time and coming through the other. What we just saw from right there is from the plane's perspective, it's just going straight. There's not It's not doing anything special. When we look at this image right here, it's just going around this curve, right? That this this square isn't teleporting at all. It just We're We're looking at it from the wrong perspective, from the wrong frame of reference. Our frame of reference is the outside of frame of reference. We're watching the plane get teleported. But inside the plane, they they see them just moving forward and backward. They don't see anything weird at all from the plane's perspective. That's why it really is kind of an optical illusion. It really is kind of cloaking. Teleportation in a way is cloaking because you just see it right there. It's a trick. It's an illusion that's happening. Now, it's also literally space-time manipulation. But why is this important? Because we're about to talk about ER = EPR here. The idea that teleportation and [snorts] quantum entanglement are the same thing. And now we're learning that a wormhole is actually just an illusion. A wormhole's a space-time topology illusion, a geo- a geometry effect. We bend these two flat space-times together, and suddenly, it it creates a continuous space-time where the plane can just keep moving forward. And now we're realizing what we were calling a wormhole, what we called a wormhole and said that's a wormhole, that's actually not Star Trek wormhole that opens up and is open and we're like, "Time to go in the the worm's mouth now." That's not what we're talking about. We're looking at this phenomenon now and we're going, "Wait a minute. This is just a geometry and this can be directly analogous to quantum tunneling. We already see this effect. We already see this exact effect. Negative time. If I shoot a photon, particle of light into a medium, imagine space-time medium, but in this case a different medium, and I change the refractive index of the medium, the particle actually goes through the the medium faster than the speed of light. Negative time. Google it. Negative time. So, if we do that same thing to space-time, if we make the particles go through some region of space-time, change the permittivity of space-time, the medium, we should be able to quantum tunnel right through that medium faster than the speed of light. Break the light barrier. You know what? Everything I just said all in this book. Everything I just said is all in this book right here. It's not even my ideas. I just stole them from them. Cuz that's what I do. Robin Hood out here. Robin Hood of science and physics chat. I steal from the rich, the rich in ideas. I steal from the rich in ideas and I give to the poor noobs, the poor hopeless noobs that need the ideas and the science to change their world. Now, Sabine Hossenfelder just did a video and I'm trying to find it here. Okay, that's that one. Switch this off. Sabine YouTube I guess I closed it, so I'm going to pull it back up here. And chat, I was excited at first. I thought maybe thought maybe we had turned her. Thought [snorts] possibly we had made headway. And then I saw [snorts] the thumbnail, which said ER = EPR, and then in giant red letters said ruled out. Chat, I literally just explained to you how quantum tunneling, quantum entanglement is the same effect as a wormhole. And now I got to watch a video where a former academic physicist tells you, "This is not real at all." Okay, okay, Michael, what was that guy's name? I forgot his name, chat. Uh Segreus, whatever. Okay, uh Ted Talk, uh quantum Sabine, go ahead and razzle-dazzle me with why EPR is not real. I'm sure this is going to be chock-full of facts. Here we go. >> People, if not the most popular recent idea of the foundations of physics was just ruled out. It's the idea that entangled particles are actually physically linked by wormholes known as ER = EPR. Let's have a look. ER stands for I >> Okay, I'm already going to go ahead and correct this. I didn't even get 10 seconds in, and I can already tell they've already got a false assumption. We're not assuming that particles are magically connected from wormholes. We're saying it's the same phenomenon. We're not like, "Hey man, we built a little invisible wormhole here." We're saying that that these two phenomenon are directly connected. And why this is allowed is that we haven't seen any wormholes. It's not like we have a wormhole we can go look at and compare to. So you can't say, "Oh well, that's not a wormhole." cuz you don't even know what a wormhole is. This is why I say this is the same people say, "Well, negative energy doesn't exist." So I said, "Well, if you don't even know what negative energy is, how can you say it doesn't exist?" >> Einstein-Rosen bridges, which is the technical term for the simplest type of worm >> Oh, oh, oh. One more flex, chat. >> [clears throat] >> Uh I was going to use Annie here, but we don't have a lot of time. I'm the person who's been promoting ER equals EPR more than literally every other academic physicist on the planet in the last 2 years. You can go check and ask the AIs. At least 19 times, just on my Twitter account, just in the last 2 years. That doesn't even include any of the podcast appearances where I bring it up. Okay? So think about that. Ashton Forbes is the literally the person on this world promoting ER equals EPR more than any other human being that is alive. Possibly more than the people that literally developed the idea. >> Oh, EPR stands for Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen, who wrote one of the first papers on quantum entanglement, though at the time it wasn't called entanglement. They conjecture says that entangled particles are connected by these wormholes. This idea was proposed by Juan Maldacena and Leonard Susskind in 2013. that theoretical physicists like because it's vague and sounds deep. >> Vague? It's absolutely not vague. Okay, guys. Sabine, you're pissing me off. You're pissing me off, Sabine. I've already I've already have the challenge to debate anytime you want on zero-point energy. Anytime you want. But, let's just start right here because you're obviously too afraid to even face me. So, let's just do this through the internet then. What is quantum entanglement? You explain to me how quantum entanglement works. I was looking at some dude's like 15 posts going, "Quantum entanglement's totally normal and we can totally explain it in classical physics." No, you can't. No, you can't. There's one thing over here and there's one thing over here. And now the distance is 10 light-years. But, these things are interacting instantly. Go ahead, explain it to me. Explain it to me in classical physics how that works. There is no explanation. And people try to say a bunch of random mumbo jumbo that doesn't make any sense, but you just break it down simply for them and there's no there's no explaining it. The moment they have to evoke a non-local effects, you're evoking the ether. You're already admitting you lost. It's actually crazy that people can't realize that the mathematical construct known as a wormhole, if it's not exactly quantum entanglement, it must be directly connected. How can there possibly be a known effect that we have measured and tested repeatedly, quantum quantum entanglement, quantum teleportation, something moving faster than the speed of light, connected instantaneously, How can that be real and not be connected to a wormhole, which is a connection between two points in space and time, which is a mathematical solution that we found, but we can't physically see it? So, let me just recap. We got one thing, quantum entanglement, which we've tested, we know exists, we've They've got literally records for who's quantum teleported stuff the furthest. And we can't explain it. We can't explain why it exists. On the other hand, we've got mathematical wormholes that are connections between two points in space and time, regardless of distance, but we don't see them anywhere. Do I really have to hand-hold people? Do I have to you know, do I have to put your shoes on and tie your shoelaces as well, or can we just figure this out on our own? >> But it's hard to check. If you remember the infamous episode of a wormhole on a quantum computer, yeah, that was brought to you by >> Oh, by the way, I recognize she's talking back to us. Do you You don't think I recognize she's talking back to I'm the guy that spoke about this the most. Of course she's talking back to us. I've been talking [ __ ] about Sabine for weeks. Of course she's talking back, and I hope she listens. Cuz I'm not [ __ ] around. This isn't a joke, and I'm not a grifter. Those videos are real, and those DMs I sent you, Sabine, are real, too. And I'm really a guy that's been struggling to figure this out, but here's the good news. I'm getting it now. I'm starting to understand it now. And I like it. >> ER equals EPR. The wormholes on the quantum computer were supposedly the entangled particles plus some higher-dimensional blah blah, but let's not get distracted. The idea that entangled particles are physical >> So, when it comes time to actually explain what people are saying, what's the idea of how ER equals EPR? Goes She just goes, "Let's not discuss it, blah blah." That's I'm actually starting to think she might be disinfo. You're not even going to give the other people's arguments the time of day? Yeah, there's a higher dimensional extra dimension, zero point energy, like all of space-time, and it solves all these problems all at once. Wow. Oh, it's almost too good to be true. Can you believe it? There's a answer to physics that solves all the problems all at once, and it's all out there? >> directly linked by wormholes or anything is, of course, nonsense, because entangled particles are not linked. Entanglement is a sort of correlation. It >> [laughter] >> Okay, so your argument is it's nonsense. Why? Because obviously it's nonsense. Okay, why is it nonsense? Why? Because particles aren't linked. But that's the whole basis of the argument that we're trying to make. >> [laughter] >> It's not linked, they're just correlated. The [ __ ] are you talking about, Sabine? Are you a [ __ ] idiot? Yes, they're [ __ ] linked. They're not correlated. They're linked. Quantum entanglement isn't a Well, it's a statistical chance. No, it's [ __ ] linked. There's a direct connection there. She's trying to go, "Well, when you look at the pattern, sometimes it's a little bit fuzzy, and and sometimes the rabbit" It's like, if I take two images, this rabbit right here is is a little bit more deformed than this rabbit. There's a little bit of fuzziness around this one. They're both still rabbits. You're seeing an image in both of them. You can't say that's just random. You You kidding me? The universe is literally communicating faster than the speed of light with itself. It's a correlation, uh My god. >> It implies no physical link whatsoever. A correlation just means >> What do you mean there's no physical link? We literally can see it happen. This is experimentally proven. The problem with these people is they act They act like this is not proven. You can't talk like this when we've already experimentally proven these effects. Quantum tunneling isn't a theory. Quantum entanglement isn't a theory. Quantum teleportation isn't a theory. It's engineered and controlled. It's not random chance. It's not a coincidence that this is happening. How [ __ ] are you, Sabine? There's literally two points separated by 10 light-years and it's not just a correlation. There is directly, if I touch this one, this one moves in real time instantly. That's not all. It's a little bit correlated there. No, that's a direct physical connection in our physical reality. The question is, what is the physical connection? That's the only question. Now, you tell me that's not a physical connection, then tell me what it is. Tell me exactly what the mechanism is that's having that happen. Explain it. No, she cannot explain this. There's no chance. >> is that some observable properties are related. Identical twins, for example, share the same eye color. If you know they're identical twins and you know the eye color of >> That's is not what's going on in the real world. She's trying to make it out, well, if I know some information over here, I can know some That's not how what quantum entanglement is. Quantum entanglement is if you touch this thing instantly, this thing moves instantly over here, separated by 10 light-years. There's no way information can travel that fast. This is not random. She's trying to make it sound like this is a random chance of the universe. Well, if you happen to know this person's eyes are blue, then you know that their twin must also be blue. Dude, their twin's not in a different galaxy. If your twin's in a different galaxy and you know they have a twin in a different galaxy, that would be [ __ ] weird. If I know I have a an absolute twin, I'm only me. There's no twin. If I If a twin shows up from another galaxy, that's proof of entanglement, chat. >> One of them you know the eye color of the other. That's what it means for properties to be correlated. Knowing the one will tell you something about the other. It doesn't mean they're physically connected and >> Correct. And that's why this is not correlation. This is crazy. That's why she just made the argument for why quantum tunneling is not correlation. It's direct causation. That's the difference here. So, when she's making an argument for correlation not being causation, she's right. But, that's not what we're seeing in quantum tunneling and quantum and quantum entanglement, which is why she's wrong. >> entanglement is like that. You can of course say, "Ah, look, we just take the mathematics for the entanglement and call that a wormhole." Okay, I admit this isn't wrong. It's just mean >> did do that, actually. And right after this clip, I'm literally going to show you where they literally did the thing that they've been saying that you can't do. And this is the weirdest part is how do she not know these papers exist? They did this on Sycamore's quantum computer. There's a huge paper about it in 2022. Huge paper about it. They proved this is actually true, and they can use quantum qubits to simulate real wormholes mathematically. >> meaningless. I could also call my hair a non-perturbative field configuration, but it still wouldn't converge. If you want the ER equals EPR conjecture to be physically meaningful, then well, you actually need some kind of wormhole there. If entangled particles are really connected by wormholes, then these wormholes should do something more than looking profound on a seminar slide. >> No, it doesn't. I just showed you guys what a wormhole is. Do you guys see any magical mystical Harry Potter tunnels? This is the problem. She's looking for Deep Space Nine wormholes, Star Trek Deep Space Nine wormhole. She's looking for a physical object in our reality that's connecting two points that's open that she can jump in and she can skip to another part in the universe and while she's inside it, she can be like, "Ooh, I'm flying in the wormhole, guys. Here we go." But I just showed you that's not what a wormhole is. How many people do I have to embarrass on wormholes before people start paying attention that I'm not a I'm not a crackpot here. A wormhole is an instantaneous bridge. When the plane disappears, it instantly appears on the other side. There's no tunnel. There is no tunnel. There's just a throat. And that's it. You get sucked in one side and you're instantly spit out the other side. That's why you don't see it. That's why you're not seeing the wormholes cuz it's not a physical phenomenon that you're seeing in the sky that's going to open up. It's a It's something that's literally connected by an extra dimension, which is why you don't see it. And when we say it's connected by an extra dimension, I'm not talking about a physical tunnel. It's a way for your mind to understand the concept that our 3D beings can't understand. I feel like I got to play like that that alien kid. You guys probably know the kid I'm talking about. Let's see if I can do it. Do you understand the dimensions? Do you have to stack the books on top of each other? And then if you look at it from the perspective of this, then you understand. And if I stack another book, it's [snorts] like stacking the dimensions. You know I'm talking about that kid that's like 12 or whatever, and you got to wonder like who the hell is that kid talking to? Like what Who is that kid talking to? Definitely check into them. Anyway, here we go. But anyway, you guys need to watch that video that I was talking about with that kid, cuz he explains it. And obviously this is a being hasn't seen it. >> Right. The authors of the new paper now ask a simple question. Suppose an electron is entangled with something else. If that entanglement is a physical wormhole, and the electron has an electric field, then some of the electric field must go into the wormhole. Can we not measure this? At first, the answer to this question seems to be no, because whatever the wormhole, it's ridiculously tiny. Otherwise, we'd see particles disappear and reappear like popping in and out through portals. But the authors look at a case that we've measured very, very precisely, a hydrogen atom. A hydrogen atom consists of just one proton. >> Oh. Oh, she is definitely trolling us now. There's There's There's no way. This is No way. So first he says, "Okay, you have to figure out where does that energy go?" And then she says, "Well, we can come up with an example. We come up with an example. How about a hydrogen atom? Like the ground state of a hydrogen atom? Like how Puthas' 1987 scientific paper, ground state of the hydrogen atom? Where he literally explains the interchange and exchange of energy between every atom, and literally uses the hydrogen atom as the example and says actually maybe Sabine can answer this question for us since she's out here doing videos and watching us apparently. How come the electron which in your model of classical physics is constantly moving around the atom maybe a cloud of gas or whatever you want to think of it. Where does the energy come from to sustain that electron? I mean you don't believe in perpetual motion, right? Perpetual motion can't be real, right? So if perpetual motion's not real, then the electron should crash into the nucleus of the of the atom. It should run out of energy. But that never happens not on any atom ever on Earth for as long as time has existed. Why doesn't that happen? Well, Hal Puthoff tells us that that's because every atom is actually sitting in this bath of invisible energy in this extra dimension. And it's absorbing energy and giving a little bit of it back all the time. Keeping an equilibrium. Sort of like if you are a buoy on top of the ocean and you're just sitting there just chilling half above the water half below the water. You barely even notice. You would think the water is not even there. Exactly. So now I can tell you Sabine Hossenfelder is about to fall into a trap. >> in the atomic nucleus surrounded by one electron. They both have a spin and usually the electron and the proton spin are entangled. The authors now say that if the entanglement is a wormhole then part of the electric field that spans between the electron and proton goes through the wormhole. That in and of itself is unobservable. However, if you poke a hydrogen atom with an electromagnetic field at the right frequency, you can break this entanglement and create an electron-proton pair that is not entangled. The authors' point is then that these two states are now different. The one has a wormhole, the other not. And this makes a relative difference for the charge distribution in the hydrogen, which then makes a measurable difference for the energy levels of the electron. And this difference, well, isn't there. The electron energy levels of the two states, entangled and not entangled, are >> So, I can't even really understand what you're saying there, but she's wrong. No matter what she's saying, she's wrong. Uh I think the main reason why she's wrong is if there's a reservoir of energy where we're sucking this energy in. This is why you're not seeing the energy spit out on the other side. This The main argument seems to be that if there's a bridge between these two points, then we should see some energy get sucked in this way and some energy get spit out this way. But if we do some measurements over here on this entanglement, we don't see this get sucked out. Therefore, it's not really a wormhole. That seems to be what their argument is, but Pootoog completely destroys that, right? Cuz if the if we're sitting in this bath of energy and there's an exchanging energy, that explains why we're not seeing energy get shot out from one half of the wormhole. And we know she's wrong. We know she's wrong. Why? Cuz electromagnetic fields, the plane is electromagnetic fields. Everything's electromagnetic fields. We just watched a plane get teleported through the sky and it presumably show up somewhere else. It doesn't matter where, somewhere. So, we know we know you can send electromagnetic fields through the extra dimension and have it show up somewhere else. That's not even in question. So, she is Sabine Hossenfelder as a statement of fact is objectively wrong about everything in this video so far. >> perfectly described by the standard quantum maths without the wormholes. Of course, this doesn't entirely rule out the idea, strictly speaking, it just means that if there are wormholes, then very little of the electromagnetic field goes through them. So, they say that >> these all these assumptions now are all just false because you work you worked off a false premise. If your theory doesn't have a space is empty, then yes, you're going to need something shooting out on the other side. You say, "Oh, it might be just really small." No, it doesn't really matter because it that we're living in an ocean of energy. If you look at the universe as an ocean of energy where the water eventually gets back to the ocean, then all these problems go away. >> Some parameter must be very small. This is why I have to give the paper three out of 10 on the [ __ ] meter, but that isn't because of the paper, it's because the idea itself was already [ __ ] So, of course, you can't rule it out. Now, look, the people who work on this will say, "But, this is not what we mean by ER = EPR. It's not a real wormhole. It just >> I like how she says, too, she already interjects that she had a pre she already came in with her mind made up. There was all [ __ ] And she's repeated that multiple times. And I think we're Is this our second promo we're about to get? Our second commercial in a 7-minute video? She makes 7-minute videos, and she's got multiple in in-video reads. >> the way to think about the maths. In which case, you know, maybe you should stop calling it wormholes. It's quite easy to predict that this paper will not make a difference, and physicists will happily continue publishing about this because it really doesn't matter at this point whether it's got any relation to reality. Still, I wanted to tell you about this paper because it's good to see that at least some people still treat the foundations of physics as the science it once was. In summary, ER = EPR may be useful as mathematics, metaphor, or grant writing vocabulary, but as a physical wormhole, it appears to have the experimental visibility of my patience. >> [clears throat] >> Is that true, Sabine? Huh? If [snorts] that's true, then [clears throat] why does this article exist? Physicists create holographic wormhole using quantum computer. The unprecedented experiment explores the possibility of space-time somehow emerges from quantum information. They've created the first-ever wormhole, kind of theorized 1935 Nathan Rosen. The wormhole emerged like a hologram out of quantum bits of information stored in tiny superconducting circuits. By manipulating the qubits, physicists sent information through the wormhole. The team led by Maria Spiropulu, and I You guys should check her stuff out. I think she's the one where I read more. This goes way deeper, too. Like, they've already literally proven ER = EPR is true. These people have already proven it's true experimentally. Sabine Hossenfelder is not read up on this at all, I guarantee you. Implemented the novel wormhole teleportation protocol. They literally built a protocol and sent information in a complex system, not just one bit of information, a complex system of information through an analog wormhole in a quantum computer, and it showed up on the other side. Get [ __ ] Sabine Hossenfelder. And just to add insult to injury, Ashton Forbes is a better physicist than you. Here you go. I already predicted the Nobel Prize last year before it even came out. Boom. This is how it works. You don't want to call it wormhole? That's fine. We don't have to call it a wormhole. Call it macroscopic quantum tunneling. >> dimension. So, if we were to see that experiment, we would see the ripple in that extra dimension. And this is how quantum tunneling works as well. How is the electron getting through? Because there's an extra dimension, and you're seeing the ripple. And now, from the perspective of quantum mechanics, you would say there's a probability that the electrons on the other side of the wall." And so, what is the analogy then if we say ER equals EPR? We say, "Okay, that's EPR. We just saw the electron teleport through a wall that shouldn't be able to do physically." Well, the equivalent is we need to find out what's the barrier of our macroscopic reality. What's the wall? The wall is space-time. The wall is the zero-point energy. That's the wall between me being here and me being in your seat. So, if we remove that zero-point energy, if we squeeze that zero-point energy out, then theoretically we can cause macroscopic quantum tunneling to occur. >> Macroscopic quantum tunneling, otherwise known as you know what? I got a better name for a wormhole, too. Chat, let's call it unlabored acceleration. How about unlabored acceleration? The reason why I love it is because what we're doing is we're conditioning the vacuum, conditioning space-time, conditioning around our object in order to reshape topography of space-time itself, just like in that video we watched. How are we going to do this? How are we going to interact with space-time? This is the big mystery. What is gravity manipulation? How do we do that? How do we figure that out? Well, for our last thing tonight, I want to I was digging through some of my old links that I have up. And how crazy is this? Let me pull this up. I saw that I had been digging through the old NASA breakthrough physics propulsion conference proceedings, and I found this massive massive document. In fact, I was actually looking for the big slide that shows all of the things they worked on. And what I found out was David Froning was like one of the main reasons why this happened. This conference. And I was going through this. There's 416 pages on this. I was randomly sliding through it and I saw something that stuck out to me earlier today, right before this live stream. And it was this. And I scrolled up to the top of it and I said, "Experiments to explore space coupling specially conditioned electromagnetic fields." Chat, this is the felony physics. This is the stuff that gets you put on lists. This is why you guys are here tonight. This is the stuff that you don't get on the Discovery Channel. You're not going to get this on uh the Corridor Crew or Danny Jones. This is the stuff that you only get right here. I'm here to tell you this. This is the secret that I get you on that gets you further than everybody else. I've already seen what the answer is and I've been reverse engineering to figure out how they pulled it off and we're directly over the target. These are the guys that pulled it off. Found them. Found them. So, you don't need to go looking around on which papers you need to read. I've already got it laid out for you. These are them. These are the crew. Here we go. Let's do this thing. Although the space-time metric is associated with gravitation and can be distorted somewhat by electromagnetic influences, there's no strong interaction or coupling between ordinary electromagnetic fields and those of gravitation because they are a different essence and form. But if the fields associated with ordinary electromagnetic radiation, think of light, could be endowed with an essence and form similar to that which underlies gravitation, a much stronger coupling or interaction might be accomplished for propulsive use. This paper describes several ways of creating specially conditioned electromagnetic radiation and several ways that the fields associated with such radiation might interact with those associated with gravity or the vacuum's zero point state. Boom, baby. Why does he say or? Because it's assumed that gravity and zero point energy are connected. Okay, let's skip ahead a little bit. He basically tells us all about zero point energy fluctuations. I don't remember if he talks out Hal Puthoff. He says, "Thus, if everything and this is what you'll see from some of the people who will try to argue against this, they'll say everything is Lorentz invariant, means everything's in a calm equilibrium. So that you can't have this zero point energy, you can't have free energy." And he says, "Thus, the zero point energy acts uniformly over bodies moving at a constant speed causing no net force. But, the zero point energy fluctuations are not isotropic and Lorentz invariant in the accelerating reference frames and accelerating bodies." So, what's the answer? They're only Lorentz invariant in constant speed. When they're accelerating, all the rules are thrown out. Now you say, "Ashton, what about the ion pumpy thing in General Mcasland?" And I say, "That's why they've got their undulator in there." Remember, the clapping effect and the synchronization? If they want to drive something far from equilibrium, imagine you're trying to break your wine glass with your voice. You got to hit that thing with the right pitch, you got to drive it far from equilibrium until it shatters. That's what these guys are trying to do. So, you have to it So, what we want to do is we want to accelerate our particles. We want to accelerate our particles, get them moving in motion in synchronization, and potentially get them oscillating respective to one another, so we can get relativistic effects, accelerating effects. So, that's the big difference right there. That's huge. I'm going to read this one more time. The zero-point energy is not isotropic and Lorentz invariant in accelerated frames of accelerated bodies. Haisch, Rueda, and Puthoff have proposed that inertia of bodies might be a consequence of zero-point energy. It is. Okay. Now we know about that. Let's keep going down here. Where is the part I want to get to? We're going to skip down here, although this is Mark Millis. Mark Millis notes that electromagnetism is a logical choice for creating an accelerating induced force, and that it is related to some degree to space-time and gravity, and as techno- technology we are fairly proficient. Okay, let's keep going. Here we go. This is the part. Okay. In this respect, the behavior of all matter and radiation can be described in terms of gauge fields, with the sources of such fields being conserved quantities. If the essence of the generated gauge field is different than the essence of its source, the field is able Abelian. If the essence of the generated field and its source are identical, it's non-Abelian Abelian Abelian non-Abelian non-Abelian. Non-Abelian fields are therefore sometimes viewed as being generated by themselves. Gauge fields that describe ordinary electromagnetic radiation and electrical attraction or repulsion of electrons and protons within atoms and molecules are Abelian, while non-Abelian fields are associated with processes such as weak and strong fields. Okay, sorry. This is not what I wanted to read. Um This is what I wanted here. If a non-abelian field underlies gravitation, and what is he saying in non-abelian? He's saying that there's essentially an extra dimension, just like the kid with the book. Just like the kid with the book. If we add an extra dimension, it changes the equations of electromagnetism. Suddenly now, I have to worry about up, I have to worry about straight ahead, I have to worry about left and right. But now I have to worry about the extra dimension. There's an extra degree of freedom. So this changes all of our math, changes our equations, changes how we have to look at Maxwell's equations. And if you're wondering, is this connected to the scalar potential? Yes, exactly. So if the non-abelian field underlies gravitation, as suggested by Yang, significant interaction between non-abelian gravitational fields and abelian electromagnetic fields is not likely. But one of us, Terrence Barrett, has shown the possibility of transforming ordinary electromagnetic fields into conditioned electromagnetic fields of non-abelian form and higher symmetry. So, he's saying, Terrence Barrett has an idea on how to convert normal light, normal electromagnetic energy, into energy that will manipulate gravity. That's what they're saying right there. Plain English. You just have to be able to convert a few words. >> [snorts] >> He postulates the possibility of such fields coupling globally with the non-abelian gauge fields that may be associated with space-time gravitation through a quantity that may be a commonly known as the A vector potential. Now this is huge. That right there is the Rosetta Stone. I just gave you do felony physics that certain CIA agents are probably listening to this having a panic attack over. The answer is the not for the non-abelian field, this creates what is that extra vector? That extra vector, that extra gauge, it's giving us this connection to this extra dimension, and they're saying, "How do we control that?" The A vector potential. The vector potential is directly connected to that. Okay. Well, now we have that. Can we take it further? The preponderance of current scientific opinion is that gravity is one of four fundamental forces, but investigators such as Sakharov and Pudov contend that gravity is not a fundamental force, but one that arises from continual electromagnetic interplay from the zero-point fluctuations. The zero-point fluctuations in such a configuration can therefore be considered an an abelian field of U1 symmetry. But if a non-abelian field underlies gravitation, I already read all this. Okay. Perhaps such a non-abelian field component would be manifested in accelerated frames, where a spectral distortion of ZPF occurs. Now, why is this very interesting? Because I'm starting to figure out what's in the orbs. The ion pumpy thing. General McCaslin might be as important to find as Edward Lynn at this point. I think he was leaking it to us. It's all about accelerated frames. And how do we create our accelerated frames? We create our undulators, and we have them start vibrating like this, and now we're creating accelerated frames because things are coming towards each other, then they're slowing down, and then they're accelerating again. And if you look at this, this motion, in theory, if they're correct here, then this motion I'm doing should cause relativistic acceleration frames between them. Between these objects that are looking at each other. So, if there is the possibility of inertia accelerated matter being a consequence of both abelian and non-abelian gauge field interactions with these interactions as suggested then it should be through accelerated matter or distorted zero point energy. So, there's two ways where this should be possible. Number one, we manipulate the zero point energy. If we pull the zero point energy away, that should give us what we want. The other way is if we use conditioned electromagnetic fields. This is Salvatore Pais. Now, I haven't checked because A, I don't want to get Salvatore Pais killed and I don't want to get him in trouble, but I would bet you if you do a cross-reference of David Froning's and Terence Barrett's conditioned electromagnetic fields, you're going to find a lot of overlaps directly with what Salvatore Pais has been talking about in terms of amplifying energy. I would take a look at his high energy electromagnetic field generator very closely. >> [clears throat] >> And again, I haven't looked yet, so I don't know. Ordinary and specially conditioned EM radiation. Although And by the way, this paper's 30 years old. This is 30 years old, this paper. Although even the most complex combinations of frequency and amplitude modification do not transform EM fields into non-abelian fields of higher symmetry. This is very important. The reason why we don't see gravity manipulations cuz normal electromagnetic waves don't interact or you think about it as don't interact strongly with gravity. So, that's why you can't just say, "Oh, electromagnetism and gravity are connected like this." There's a key. We have to figure out the key. Once we figure out the key code, then they do connect, but they don't connect before that. It's like a lock that we have to figure out the answer to. And we're going to figure it out. And he says, "Even if you do modulation and amplitude changes, you're still not going to get strong coupling. You have to do something very specific if you want to get this coupling effect." I'm going to write something down. Okay. He says, "A transformation can be accomplished by modulating the polarization of the electromagnetic energy radiated from antennas or apertures of RF or laser transmitters or by tuning the frequency of wavelength of EM forms to toroidal geometries that cause the waveforms alternating current moves. These two methods increase EM field symmetry from U1 to SU2 and result in non-abelian gauge fields with the ability to couple globally with fields of similar" So, he's saying, "If you can modify change the polarization, do this modification, you can now suddenly turn a normal electromagnetic field, think of light, into something that straight up manipulates gravity." Now, where is the secret? Where did the physicists miss? What did they miss? They just assumed that it was something straightforward. They were just looking for, "Hey, here's electromagnetism, here's gravity. Now they're connected." But no, there was actually a lock. There was a secret recipe that was needed to unlock them. That's what they missed. And it requires understanding there's an extra dimension or you can't even get there. You can't even figure it out. And how did these people figure it out? Cuz they looked at experiments like quantum tunneling, quantum entanglement, and they realized, "Oh, this is what nature's doing. Maybe this is what's really going on. Then he says here, these two methods increase EM field symmetry and results in the non-abelian fields able to globally couple of fields of similar through the action or something something that may be common to both. So, here's the thing that's common to both fields. What's common to gravity and what's common to normal electromagnetism? The vector potential. The A vector potential is possibly where we're going to find the key that connects the two together. Hm, there it is, the A vector potential. >> [snorts] >> Thus, if non-abelian gauge field configurations with SU2 components are associated with gravitation or zero-point energy, there should be a possibility for modifying gravitational or zero-point energy influences within the specially conditioned beams of radiation. Who wants to know how it's done? Eric W. Davis When he was talking about how do you create negative energy in a to us, I was listening. Actually, [snorts] I was listening very closely to what he said. And he said, a parabolic cylindrical mirror. A parabolic cylindrical mirror. Basically, this can made out of a mirror. The can made out of a mirror creates at its center line, right through the middle of it, A focus of negative energy, a beam of negative energy, you could even think. That's his idea, and have it spin and rotate. And you can do this, and you can get a potentially those accelerating effects, and you can cause an amplification of negative energy around the focal point of your of your cylindrical mirror. And I would say, "Oh, I know how to do that." They literally figured out how to do this with plasma. They literally made plas cylindrical plasma mirrors just like this. In fact, this is also very similar to dense plasma focus, and some of the fusion mechanisms as well. Okay, it's almost Yahtzee time. Let's keep going. The propagating speed of electromagnetic disturbances within a given region of empty space is determined by the electrical permittivity and magnetic permeability of the vacuum by which they move. So, the speed of light, if we now realize space is a medium, we can engineer the speed of light. Because the speed of light is literally the the permittivity and permeability of space-time. So, if we change the permittivity and permeability of space-time, we change the speed of light. Anyone says the speed of light's a constant, well, kind of correct, but also kind of kind of dumb. Wavefronts within normal normal electromagnetic beams, therefore, propagate as planar or spherical disturbances C. However, if polarization modulated beams, the condition beams, interact with space-time metric, permit permeability and permittivity and wavefront speeds change within the specially conditioned beams, then the EM fronts will propagate as non-planar or non-spherical disturbances at variable speeds within the beams. Not exactly [snorts] sure what that means. Now, expanded equations. I'm going to just skip past this a little bit, but here is the math. I'm going to zoom in on it for a second. Essentially, what you're doing here now is if you take this extra dimension, this extra electromagnetic coupling, you have the whole new set of equations. You have your normal standard Maxwell equations on the left, and on the right, you have your new expanded equations. There you go. Enjoy the math. Probably very similar to max scalar potential beard and scalar potential. Very similar ideas where taking the Kaluza-Klein model of the extra dimension, adding a degree of freedom, and now this changes the math around. And now we solve for the math and we say, "Oh, well, now I know how to teleport something." When I solve for the math, here's my A vector potential, and the A vector potential is going to teleport my plane that way. There you go. This is what I wanted to read. Creation of polarization modulated EM radiation. A means of creating polarization modulated EM radiation of SU2 symmetry in non-Abelian form is described by Barrett. So, this is basically saying, "How do you create your gravity beam?" One fraction or ordinary input of electromagnetic energy is seen to be divided into three fractions. Okay. Three fractions. Split your beam into three. One fraction orthogonally polarized. Change the polarization. Choo. Change the polarization of one of the beams. Okay, got it. Another fraction is expended in accomplishing the phase modulation of the polarization rotated wave energy. So, modulate the phase of the wave. The remaining fraction of the input energy is then combined with that of the polarized and phase modulated wave. So, then mix it back all together, and the emission of especially emitted electromagnetic radiation will continually vary polarization with respect to time. Now, let me add on to something else here. One of the things I remember from one of the interviews of George Miley is he was trying to figure out how to get laser beams to link And what we're realizing here is we're going to have these different phases of beams. And what we're trying to do is we need these beams to link back up together. Sounds familiar. One mechanism by which you can control waves of beams of waves is something called a soliton. It's like a highway. You're like, you chilling this highway. You chilling this highway. I think that they may be using this concept to either control how the waves interact and intersect to create the interference zones. The other possibility they can be doing is they can be creating a specially squeezed state of light within that undulator. That undulator with the particles flying through it all waving around, synchronizing back and forth. They can be creating a squeezed state of light in there, and at that focal point, it's creating that focus of negative energy. I forgot what I was going to say. Let's keep going. Okay. That's good enough, though. Um If a fraction of the input wave energy is expended in accomplishing the phase modulation, the electric and magnetic field intensity associated with the polarization modulated radiation can be less than for normal EM radiation for a given input power. But energy conservation requires that expended energy not truly vanish, but be transformed into another form. One possibility would be increased A vector potential field intensity within the EM radiation. Oh boy, there it is. There it is. How do I explain this? So, due to conservation if we're increasing energy somewhere, it has to be at the cost somewhere else. So, he's saying I think what he's saying here is we can control where the energy output goes. We can focus the energy into the A vector potential we're trying to create. In respect to the plane and the orb spinning around the plane, it's basically saying we don't need these orbs to get super hot. We can keep these things low energy and we're focusing all the energy we're creating into creating this wormhole, this connection, this invisible tunnel between here and over here. Focus on creating the quantum tunneling. That's what we want you on. That's what you're good at. If so, significant polarization modulation could be significant could significantly diminish electric and magnetic field intensity while increasing the A vector potential intensity for coupling with the A vector fields. That's exactly what I Okay, there it is. Yep. I was right there. There's the next sentence. Sorry, I just had to read the next sentence, chat. My bad. Um Figure four shows the path straight out by the arrow of the electric fields and the polar as you say, well, how is it going to determine where it's going? This is all based on electromagnetism. So, everything about where the plane's going must also be based on electromagnetism. The last bit, I think I just want to do the last part down here. Which one? This part down here, but Uh okay, let's read this. Vector potential wave patterns. Specially conditioned electromagnetic fields consist entirely of the A vector potential wave patterns can be created. Holy [ __ ] That's saying you can make a wormhole. You can make engineer systems by which almost all the energy is being put into the wormhole. That's what they're saying right there. By flow of alternating current through a toroid with single windings. You wonder why the plane the orbs are spinning around the plane? They're literally creating a toroid. They're literally creating a toroid around the plane. The resulting magnetic and electric fields do not extend significantly outside of the toroid, but its geometry and the alternating current flow produces overlapping A vector potential patterns which extend outward from the toroid significant distances. Yeah. Wow. It is winding up. It is winding up, chat. When they're spinning around the plane just like the image on the right here, they're creating those A vector potentials around it. But what happens is as they keep spinning like that, they constructively interfere with one another. I'm guessing that makes them wind up basically. So, this actually might be distance limited. We might actually not be able to teleport to Alpha Centauri with this. Interesting. I still think we can eventually no matter what, but the overlapping patterns combined into a phase factor waves which represent disturbances in the A vector potential. Yeah, exactly. They I was right. The overlapping patterns. The pattern of these disturbances shown in figure six become almost spherical in shape as the distances from the toroid of the order of its diameter or greater. At present time it is not known whether the phase factor waves are standing waves or if they propagate at non-zero speed. Wow. Says and and interactions with space-time metric or the ZPF would be expected to be the most intense at the various resonant frequencies. If an A vector potential field underlies the essence of ZPF. So, he's also saying from this part right here, this effect is resonance based. You're only going to see this effect strongly when you hit the right resonant condition, otherwise you're not going to see anything at all. So, in addition to all of this, then you also need to be able to hit the right resonant frequency. And that resonant frequency may depend. It's going to depend on the medium that you're using. In the case of plasma, it depends on the plasma frequency. The last bit. This is the most crazy part to me. Electrical power needs. It would be desirable that specially conditioned EM beams used in operational field propulsion systems not require significantly greater electrical power than required by powerful radar and laser systems in use or other use. But although significant electrical power is likely to be required for the generation of the EM beam, such power would be invested primarily in the creation of A vector potential disturbances, not in the generation of intense electric and magnetic fields. Wow. That's why the orbs are so low energy. This confirms by the way that the letter Ash and Forbes is really it's a low energy phase transition. Why? Because they're converting all the energy into a vector potential energy. Into wormhole energy, space juice energy, if you want to think of it like that. They're converting all that energy into space juice energy. That's a very scientific term by the way, chat. And he says it's going to require a huge amount of energy to produce these electromagnetic beams. To make these specially conditioned beams, we need a large amount of energy. But it's going to be focused not on making a huge electricity ball that's super powerful. It's going to be focused on manipulating space-time. That's why the main condition of the orbs is them spinning around the plane. Cuz they're just little balls of lightning, little balls of electricity. More advanced field propulsion system that could interact more strongly with gravity or zero vacuum zero point state could require higher power that is achievable for could require Wait. Greater power than is achievable. Such levels of power would have to be supplied by systems of extremely high energy density. So he's saying we can't do this with normal propulsion mechanisms. Normal engines are not producing enough energy to do this. Now this is huge. You say, Ashton, why is this not If we can manipulate gravity and space-time, why are people people not building more of these devices? Because they require a huge amount of energy to produce the conditioned electromagnetic beam. Just produce the beam, it requires a large amount of energy to pull off. And it's very complicated based on what I just told you. Now listen closely cuz this is the best part. One example of this type of system might be the Aneutronic Fusion Electric spacecraft power system proposed by Robert Bussard, which emits no neutrons and causes no radioactivity. Hell yes, chat. Where is it? >> [music] [music] >> Come [ __ ] Come get some. I want all the smoke. I want everybody. When I read, I couldn't believe the damn words that I was reading on the page that I had never read before that says Ashton Forbes is right in big bold letters. This might be my absolute favorite of anything I've ever found in any live stream. One example of the impossible energy requirements that we're going to need to pull this off come from a neutronic fusion electric power systems. BOO YEAH, [ __ ] HELL YEAH. WOO! THOSE ORBS ARE a neutronic fusion reactors. No [ __ ] question about it. No doubt about it. Those orbs are a neutronic fusion reactors. We've got the United States government by the cojones. We got their balls in a vice. Ain't nothing you can do, [ __ ] Come get some. I got an army of Anonymous behind me that are ready to take up if anything happens to me. I don't give a [ __ ] I'm just going to enjoy the ride as far as I can enjoy it at THIS POINT. WOO! OOH. A MORE SPECULATIVE possibility would be extraction of electrical energy power from the vacuum of space itself. If favorable warping of space-time metric is associated with regions of negative energy density in the vicinity of the accelerating ship and if diminished ZPE would be associated with such negative energy, one could visualize such ZPE diminishment as being a consequence of successful ZPE extraction. Yes. COME GET SOME. EVERYTHING I'VE BEEN saying for years right there. When you extract zero-point energy, you produce negative energy and you get real energy out of it and IT IS FREE [ __ ] ENERGY. WE ARE COMING FOR ALL YOU [ __ ] WHO ARE LYING ABOUT THIS. ALL OF YOU. NOBODY IS SAFE. I'M getting every one of those PhDs. I'm going to have them lined up and I'm going to rip them up in front of you while you cry. Time for super chats. Ooh. Pill chat popping off today, guys. Nice to see you guys in there. Hope you guys are doing well. Rumble chat. Thank you guys as well for hanging out tonight. Appreciate you guys. K Sierra, Double L's, Not Yoda, TF13. Living Soul, nice to see you guys. Let's get to the supers. Chad 48309, Gary Nolan is beloved because he's a nice guy. Exactly. And nice guys finish last if you've learned anything. And that's why Action Forbes is not a nice guy cuz I'm not here to sit around and watch uh people get stomped all over. I'm here to make a difference, and I'm here to tear down anybody that's stupid enough to get in my way. Simple as that. Chaotic good Rolls-Royce tip jar Rolls-Royce is going to be producing small modular nuclear reactors. Does that not make you feel safe? Rolls-Royce who covered up the engine data in MH370, Rolls-Royce who literally covered up the engine data in MH370 to protect the US government is suddenly making small nuclear reactors. Guess everybody's making small nuclear reactors suddenly. We don't know how to make small nuclear reactors 2 years ago. Now everybody's making them. Amazing how technology suddenly advances overnight with nothing happening. 877 Swiss Miss says just thanks Ashton for your endurance and your dedication. Thank you very much Swiss Miss, appreciate you. Chaotic good says, "Not there's anything wrong with that." Chat, I'm not a bigot. I think people can believe whatever they want, be whatever, pretend to be whatever gender you want, sleep with whoever you want, believe whatever stupid [ __ ] you want to believe. Makes no difference to me in my life whatsoever. Just don't be a damn hypocrite. Don't be somebody that tries to tear other people down while you don't actually do anything yourself. That's all I demand. Otherwise, the four orbs curse is coming. If you don't believe in the four orbs curse, chat, you better start believing the four orbs curse. You think I don't believe in coincidences. I'm literally reading a paragraph by David Froning and saying everything that I've ever been saying for the last 2 years, and I didn't know this existed earlier today. There ain't no coincidences, chat. Dobby with a throbby based and Chad pill. Dobby with throbby, probably my favorite username. XLX Squeeze says yes it is and yes they are. I don't even remember the context, but thank you very much, appreciate you. And Joel Real Robinson says, "What if it had been you instead of Eric W. Davis during that conference in Obel and tried interrupting you?" He'd been for a rude awakening. At that time I didn't know that much about negative energy production. At that time we were still trying to figure out what the hell's a squeeze state of light. What does that even mean? Now we know. Squeeze state of light, we take our light beam and we squeeze it and what happens is part of the wave drops below zero. Drops into the negative and you go, "Whoa, is that negative energy? Is that tapping into zero point energy?" Answer is yes. They're actually manipulating the medium when they're doing that. And then the question is how do you capture How do you capture that bit of negative energy? Solitons. You basically create a highway and you say this part of the wave is negative, this part of the wave is positive and you give them their own avenue. Or like Eric Davis says, make your parabolic cylindrical mirror and now your focal point will naturally be an energy high region of negative energy density. That's the one I'm going with. XLX Squeeze says Ash, is she poking at my H1 pro proton vortex? It seems like I may have to deal with her like I did Sarfatti. And guys, be nice out there even though I'm very rude to people. Like I keep it on the level in terms of I may call them an idiot, but I challenge them. Like I called some other guy an idiot, but I said, "The reason why you're an idiot is because you don't offer any solutions. You say, 'Oh no, ER = EPR is stupid and it's obviously fake.' But you don't produce any answer for what quantum entanglement is. How about you put your idea out there?" That's how you should attack people. Don't just attack people and be spiteful. Attack them to get the answer that you want, to challenge their viewpoint. And so when you look at me and you look you'll see that in many cases not only am I just attacking somebody but I'm saying, "Hey, what is electricity? How does gravity work? How are you going to try to shoot somebody down when you can't even answer these basic questions?" Six Night Slayer 9 says "Hossenfelder PhD revoked." No, thank you. We're going to give it to that 12-year-old kid who understands dimensions better than Sabine Hossenfelder. XLX we says "Okay, love you, bro. Challenge accepted. Terta uh uh tetraquark torque can lower the Coulomb barrier 18 to 25%." So yeah, I think you can make these quark-gluon plasmas. And sounds like if you use torque and sounds like that's what we've been talking about with the spin, you can potentially create the conditions where you can create these Coulomb barrier reductions. Plumber Guy 33, $20 don't know. Thank you. Fantastic work, Ashton. Don't stop. I won't. Thank you very much, Plumber Guy. Mark Jackson says "Free energy, baby. I want my A neutronic race car. Hell yeah. I want my A neutronic Jarvis orb." Barty welding Tip of the hat to the chat. Our numbers only grow. Indeed, everybody. Okay, guys. Thank you very much for hanging out. I appreciate it, guys. We'll be back on Wednesday probably with a little bit of a shorter stream on Wednesday cuz I'm working really long shifts this week, but I'm glad you guys were here. I'm glad we were able to do this and go over all this. It was a fun stream. Follow me. Hit the subscribe. Hit the like. Let's get to 100,000. My nephew wants that button, that YouTube button. Personally, I don't care about that, but my nephew's a cute kid, so let's get Let's get it for my nephew, chat. Peace out, MH370X. I love you guys. Later. >> [music] >> Infrared eyes scanning the black, [music] tracking the heat, never turning back. Control 22, a covert gaze. Control [music] 33, in the cosmic race. Controls in the mix, secrets untold. Silent watchers, brave and bold. In the shadows, they silently glide, protecting our interests, far and wide. >> [music] [music] >> In the silence of [music] space, they keep their post. Shields unseen, yet feared the most. With precision and speed, they warn of danger, keeping us safe from the missile's anger. ASPIRES, sentinel of the night, [music] watching over with infrared sight, alerting us to threats afar, guiding our defenses like a guiding [music] star. Controls in the mix, secrets untold. Silent watchers, brave and bold. In the shadows, they silently glide, protecting our interests, far and wide. >> [music] [music] >> ASPIRES, sentinel of the night, watching over with [music] infrared sight, alerting us to threats afar, guiding [music] our