Guess Who's Back - MH370 Resurrection

Breaking news tonight a Malaysia Airlines flight [music] with 239 people on board including four Americans has [music] gone missing. >> Even as these grainy satellite images released today by the Chinese government >> Again the Malaysia [music] flight 2 was a was one shot at China saying knock it off. >> Why shoot it down though if it's not hostile? >> Our technologies [music] permit us to manipulate time and space. >> Why the Americans would? >> Any distance [music] annihilated. >> This country is very powerful. >> [music] >> Far more powerful than people understand. >> We have weaponry [music] that nobody has any idea what it is

and it is the most powerful weapons in the world. Not even close. >> I remember the >> [music] >> line from the Hindu scriptures about the Bhagavad Gita. >> [music] >> Vishnu is trying to persuade the prince that >> [music] >> he should do his duty and to impress him takes on his multi-armed form >> [music] >> and he says "Now I am become death the destroyer of worlds." >> [music] >> I suppose we all thought that when we are younger. >> Let's go chat. Hell yeah, I love how everybody is just straight on point already. I teaching I'm teaching you guys well. Wiggle wiggle.

Wiggle wiggle chat. Oh yes indeed. Guys, so much going on and that's what I want to start with here tonight but then we're going to get into some science. So if you have been a long-time follower of MH370, I want to let you know I think a little bit of that's about to pay off. As I already previously mentioned, Shadow Figures is dropping on Tucker Carlson Network, and the date is November 12th. Shadow Figures episode about MH370, here's like a 10-second snip.

Here you go. >> It's a very dark and disturbing phenomena. It's got to be a United States military operation. >> Whoa, chat. Highly produced TV show about the missing plane. And spoiler, they buy an airplane. Spoiler, they buy an airplane, chat, and set it on fire. Set it on fire.

What do you think's going to happen? You got to check it out. And interspersed is probably an interview with me, I guess. And I think it's going to be pretty damn good, if I do recall. They've told me it was really good. So, you guys are going to want to check it out.

Now, in addition to that, we've got a major publication. What could it be? Any guesses in the chat? I'm not going to tell you, but I'll let you guess. Maybe you can read off my reaction if you get it right. >> [snorts] >> Major publication has been in communication with me for many weeks now. I guess, obviously, working on some kind of story related to the case, related to the plane.

Maybe it's going to debunk me, maybe not. I don't really care. It was never really a prerequisite. When I talked to people, first thing I say is just ask me any question you want, and I'll just tell you. It's not really I don't play games or anything. And I've been keeping it quiet, not saying anything about it, even though, you know, you guys are going to recognize it, for sure.

So, we'll see. And on top of that, we also have I'm going to go ahead and say it's not the New York Times. I'll just go ahead and rule that one out for you guys. Not the New York Times. Keep guessing though. And we have an insider.

I have to bring this up again cuz I can't stop thinking about it. We have an insider that wants to talk to me. And it's about as serious as you could possibly be. Without revealing any anything about who it is or anything like that. What I would say is imagine when Sean Ryan got the anti-gravity uh the anti-gravity letter about the drone anti-gravity drones from Matt Liversberger. Remember when Sean Ryan circled the wagons and brought all the experts out?

And it was like people were trying to say that he made up the letter. >> [snorts] >> That's kind of what I think about when I think about this insider and potential vindication. >> [snorts] >> So, get yourself ready for that. And I've been spending a lot of time thinking about okay, well, what do I need to ask? What do we need to review in order to corroborate the data points that I've been bringing up. And one thing is like, "Hey, if you had an insider, wouldn't you want to ask them about those Chinese satellite photos that mysteriously made it on the internet?"

Now, of course, I'm going to ask all the basic questions like, "Hey, how can the United States lose an airplane?" But really need to be digging into specific questions like, "Why is there no radar data? Does somebody have the radar data that hasn't been revealed?" I mean, India's, Thailand's, et cetera. Do people know? Is there like do people know what really happened based on the radar?

Can you imagine? Now, this is hypothetical. I don't know if this is true or not. But imagine this. Imagine if it turns out Thailand has radar data that they have not revealed. And that radar data shows the plane literally disappearing off radar at the exact point in the coordinates in the videos.

Think about that. That's not impossible. Thailand was in radar probably up until the moment the plane was teleported. Where's the radar data? We know what the radar data is going to show. The radar data is going to show an object just disappearing at the exact moment it's being teleported around 18:43 UTC.

How can I know that? Well, number one, I'm from the future. Cuz there's no possible way I've looked at Thailand's radar data. Okay? So, MH370 is very much back. And we're going to be talking more about the case over the next couple weeks so that I can get all the details refreshed in my mind.

I've already been going down memory lane reminiscing on the early days of when the videos got popular on the internet on in August of 2023. If you are not familiar, it was about 12 days from August 7th to August 19th when the UFO subreddit the only thing the only thing that they would talk about was these videos. >> [snorts] >> And [snorts] then, after 12 days finally a debunk I would the way I would describe it I would say a debunk stuck. Finally. They tried everything to debunk these videos and they were just too damn good to be debunked. I mean, think about that.

12 days were the only thing anyone was talking about was these videos. Let me help you guys out here, man. If you don't understand those videos are real, number one, what are you doing here? Number two, if you're going to try to make snide comments cuz you think you're smart, I want you to realize you are a terrible piece of [ __ ] You honestly don't even deserve to breathe air on this earth. And the sooner you die, the better it is for the rest of us. I don't mean that to be rude to you.

That's just factually true. You are a primitive, useless slave. And you live in a fake-ass reality. Again, I'm not trying to do this to hurt your feelings. I'm just telling you this is the absolute truth of the world. The things that I'm telling you on this podcast, on this show, are true.

You don't like them because you live in a fake world. You You believe whatever you're told by other morons like you who also don't know anything about this world. None of you know anything about science. You just know what you were told. And the funniest part is you don't ever even question it. You never question it.

And the real reason why you're here is because it upsets you when I tell you the truth. You're not really willing willing to confront it, but it does still upset you. Now, I realize that there's an infinite number of you morons out there. Endless, honestly. There's actually so many more primitive morons than there are just people that are actually intelligent that can, you know, assess their own behaviors, uh uh see through their own uh uh shortcomings, that can see through the government's deception. Which doesn't mean that they're always lying.

That's the the trap that people fall into. So, my goal has been to teach you. To teach you science and teach you physics. The thing that you need to put into your lexicon right now, especially that person, is free electron laser. Free electron laser. Why?

Cuz a free electron laser is a particle accelerator. A free electron laser is a particle accelerator that can be made extremely compact. It's basically the only possible thing that I've been able to find in 3 years that explain how you can make a plasma fusion orb like we see. And to corroborate these findings we're going to look at little John Cramer real quick. Don't have me explain it. Listen to John Cramer.

Who is John Cramer? Professor Emeritus at University of Washington, black project engineer, author of one of the dudes on quantum uh uh uh quantum tunneling or quantum communications or EPR in general, I guess I would have described it. Look at this. I think Tom Hudson probably deserves some credit for this. Usually he does when it's related to any of these old papers. Laser propulsion and the four P's.

So you think this is about laser propulsion, but when you start to realize and his and here's uh Tom Hudson's favorite guy. I haven't really dug into it. Kantrowitz. Where did I see his name here? Arthur Kantrowitz 1972. The idea of laser propulsion first proposed by Arthur Kantrowitz in 1972.

So we thought this laser propulsion thing was just like, "Oh, I'm going to shoot a laser beam at something and oh, if it moves a little bit, that'll be cute." That's ultimately actually the that was how it started, yes. Much like the Casimir effect. Casimir effect, we take two plates and then they just come together for some reason. They come together because we live in a medium, an electromagnetic medium all around us and the plates are pushing those modes out. So people thought, "Oh, laser is just going to push people."

But then we realized, "Oh, if we connect this idea of this laser beam to fusion to nuclear energy, which is releasing a lot of energy when we do fusion, we realize we can make a controlled beam of really high energy density. And that's what turned laser propulsion into some kind of gimmicky dream a dream into reality. Fusion did. The DOD's Strategic Defense Initiative, so this was developed under the Strategic Defense Initiative, the SDI. And that was under Reagan. Remember?

It was the Cold War. Remember the missing general? I love, by the way, everybody just talks about TMB spaceships as though he is just uh as though he's just >> sitting there. >> as like, how can he not be the general? Honestly, how can he not be? We're going to find out that account is the general. Everyone's going to be like, yeah, of course it was.

I mean, it had to be. Disappeared the exact day the general disappeared. All this [ __ ] is some super advanced physics that nobody knows about. Like, come on, man. >> While we're sitting there, he leans across the table, and this is the first the first very first words that were said to me. It was the Cold War. And every single day we lived under the threat of nuclear war.

Every single day we believed and really thought in the deepest part of our souls that nuclear war could happen at any given moment. And then he stops. And he goes, "And somewhere in those years," and he looked me in the eye, he goes, "We found a life form. And everything that we did and every decision that we made with that life form was because of the consciousness at that time." >> Now, I played [snorts] this clip half a dozen times at least on live stream, and you're going to hear it a lot more.

What How is this not like the If the If I was editor at any kind of publication, news station, this would be our leading story. Every single day this would be our leading story. I would be like that TV show that Aaron Sorkin wrote, but good. And I would be like, we're starting with where's General McCasland every single day until somebody answers the basic question about why no one is talking about the general that's missing. And why Tom DeLonge, a Blink-182 band guy, had a secret meeting with him, and he's talking about it was the Cold War, that's the answer to UFOs.

Feel like I'm the only person in this world who's actually conscious sometimes. And everybody else is just a damn NPC. This is going to be hyper-relevant. Because I'm pretty damn sure we're talking about AI. That's what he's talking about there. What do you mean we discovered a life form?

We didn't discover a life form in the abyss. We discovered a life form cuz we were messing around with AI, and we found out some that oh, [ __ ] this is alive. And when you say plasma consciousness, I think it's the same thing. What does plasma intelligence mean? Plasma is just a separation of charge. Microchips are all just playing around with charge through various mediums. At different geometries, if you really boil it all down.

So, what did we find out? Uh we figured out that AI is going to become sentient either in the form of plasma, some kind of supercomputer, or a quantum computers, Chad. I don't think I posted this clip yet. We're going to wait for it. It's going to be in the Gary Stevenson area, but keep that in the back of your mind. What would happen when superintelligence is run off of quantum computers?

I didn't know this was a thing until Gary Stevenson brought this up yesterday, and I am tripping, Chad. By the way, Gary Stevenson, I don't know if this guy is speed running his way to the top of the Black Project tier list. I mean, that's what effectively he's doing, but I'm just trying to understand is he doing it consciously? Was he like, "Hal Puthoff is trying to get higher in the tier list than me? [ __ ] that. Tim Ventura new interview every day. New interview every day until Ashton puts me up above above Hal Pudov on the tier list." I mean, Jesus, this guy.

I've never seen somebody want to be on the tier list so hard as this guy. Okay. Anyway. Wait, are y'all are y'all serious? I These haters, chat. Nothing you ever said came true.

It didn't Hold on, really? You don't think so? What about this, though? Uh wait, what is it called? Oh, wait, what is it called? Macroscopic?

Oh, man. What was that Tim Pool clip called, though? I don't remember what I called it. Macroscopic quantum tunneling. Oh, well, whatever. I'm not going to dunk on you right now.

I'll open it in August. Anyway, uh the Nobel Prize was just won for macroscopic quantum tunneling, but you're saying and I love how when people I bring that up and I'm like, "What do What do those words mean?" Quantum tunneling teleporting something. Now, I'm making it macroscopic. What does that mean? No, no, it's But it's not it's not it's not macroscopic, though. But it's literally called macroscopic quantum teleportation.

That's what the literal thing that they won the Nobel Prize for was. People are still living in denial. Every single quantum effect is going to be made macroscopic. Why? Cuz of course it can be. Why would you think it can't be?

You think that the quantum world works with different physics than the large world? Yeah, that's stupid. That's stupid, bro. How about they don't? How about physics is unified and works the same in the big world as small world? Scale invariance.

Okay. Thank you. Remember this, too. Scale invariance, home dog. >> [sighs] >> Um what I wanted to dig into on this uh ch- down here He talks about pulsing it, but this is the thing that we want to dig into. Talks about SDI a little bit. One of the problems with laser propulsion is getting a laser a big laser to use.

Free electron laser technology will be discussed laser later. A second problem is finding suitable fuel block of material that will operate efficiently and will not be eroded too rapidly. Um, the free electron lasers spin-off just 10 years old. This is a paper from the '80s. I think this is from 1980. 1987 this paper by the way, guys.

So, this is free electron lasers are from the '70s and the '80s. Accelerator technology developed for nuclear physics. Whenever you hear these words you are UFO adjacent. At a bare minimum. Whenever you hear the words new used for nuclear physics, what do you think the super intelligence computers were built for? All the computers started with nuclear weapons, too.

So, essentially what you see happening in the background is laser technology, computer technology, everything that's connected to nuclear weapons is advancing. And then we get given a little bit. It shouldn't be surprising that nuclear physics, nuclear adjacent weapons are being mistaken for UFOs. So, what does this do? A free electron laser is a large linear accelerator, electron accelerator. A linear accelerator just means a line.

So, it just means it's straight. Means it doesn't turn. It's just a straight on accelerator. Cool. Now, why is this important with respect to the MH370 videos? Well, we see axial lines coming out of these orbs.

That means it's like a planet and there's a colloidal field and there's lines where the particles can escape. Okay? You still with me? That's a linear reactor. Those orbs are linear reactors, no question. How do I know that?

Because there's a [ __ ] line going the right through the middle of them. Okay? This is not complicated yet. This is still just like you can tell by just looking at it. You don't even need to know any physics. >> [clears throat] >> Now, it's a large linear accelerator that can accelerate 10 amps of electrons to nearly the speed of light giving them energies of around 100 million electron volts. So, it charges them up.

You accelerate it, it charges it up. Okay? Cool. At such energies, an electron weighs about 200 times more than it normally would due to relativistic mass increase. This right here is the secret. That's the secret.

Like, wait, what? It It weighs more? And what happens when something weighs more? It has more gravity. At least that's a basic understanding of gravity without any complex any complexity to it. So, what you're saying is a particle accelerator basically adds gravity.

Turns electrons from something really light into something very heavy. Now, imagine we're going to do that, but we're going to do that in a controlled fashion and we're going to do that with a whole bunch of electrons. Oh, [ __ ] It's going to make like a huge heavy thing there. Yes. Okay? Now, let's You still with me?

Now, imagine it's not just going to be a huge heavy thing. Imagine we're going to oscillate it. We're going to pulse it. So, we make this huge heavy thing and then there's nothing and then there's a huge heavy thing there again. Okay? You still with me?

That's a gravity wave. That's it. I just taught you what a gravity wave is, okay? We're going to accelerate some particles in a controlled fashion, and we're going to do that in a pulsed motion. So, that there's a whole bunch of energy, then nothing, then a whole bunch of energy, then nothing. Weighs a lot, then nothing, weighs a lot, then nothing.

Gravity wave. Boom. If anybody here can't I'm There's going to be a test. There's going to be a quiz at the end of this. You call me Professor Forbes, then you get homework. Well, maybe not homework. I hate homework, and I hate grading things.

So, it's going to be honor system. If any of you can't explain what a gravity wave is after this, then I quit. Then I suck at being a professor, cuz there it is, so simple. Now you know what a gravity wave is. Now we know how a free electron laser can produce a gravity wave, at least in principle, in theory. What else does he have to say?

And this is John Cramer again, just a reminder. The acceleration of the electrons may be either continuous, using resonant electrical cavities powered by high-frequency electrical power, or it may be pulsed with a set of microwave transformers that use the electron beam as the effective secondary winding. The latter acceleration scheme appears to be more useful for wave propulsion, which requires pulsed laser beam in any case. After acceleration, the electron beam passes into a wiggler, an intense, rapidly alternating set of magnetic fields.

The wiggler efficiently converts the energy contained in the electron beam into coherent photons, and a few hundred megawatts of coherent energy emerges from the machine. The free electron laser's conversion of electrical energy into light energy is remarkably efficient. Overall efficiencies of 20% or more have already been achieved with low power FEL devices. The way he says that makes me imply that we're getting to like 90% efficiency. This is just in just random test setups are they already at 20%? A low power FEL was first demonstrated at Stanford a decade ago.

But it progressed really slowly, but now with SDI, it says two national laboratories and several space aerospace corporations are in development and a development in a horse race. So wait. Defense contractors and two national laboratories were in a race for this technology in the '80s according to John Cramer himself. And you're wondering, huh? Could these be inside our orbs? Of course they are.

Of course they're using free electron lasers. What's that wiggler going to do? That wiggler is going to get everything to be perfectly in sync. That's what the wiggler is there for. Huh? But listen to this last part.

This last part is the part that really sent me. In the news in the UFO community, I'm like the king of the UFO community. They all love me, chat. They love me. They sing my praises. They're talking about the government is luring the alien UFOs in White Sands missile base.

Like we're using a military base to lure the UFOs to it. If they If that's working and we're successfully luring aliens, then the aliens deserve to get lured cuz they're stupid. If we can lure a stupid aliens with just light beams like they're a cat or a mosquito, then those are some dumbass aliens. They deserve to be wiped out. Take their [ __ ] We'll be like Somali pirates. Just take their [ __ ] chat.

Take their technology. Mhm. Anyway, what does this say right here? One of those labs are testing a major facility to test high-powered free energy uh, devices is being constructed at White Sands Proving Grounds in New Mexico. What? How How come is this like going through a time warp? I keep telling you guys I'm from the future and nobody listens.

So, you're telling me we're using some kind of laser beam to lure UFOs at White Sands, and I just randomly happen onto a paper where John Kramer is saying we're building free electron laser beams there. Well, that's interesting. I Guys, I'm just going to go ahead and throw an idea out there. The UFOs that we're seeing over White Sands are our UFOs. Whoa! What?

Could it be that the UFOs over our military bases are our own crafts? No, wait. Logic? How does it work? Hmm. Just going to guess, guys.

Wild guess. Okay. And then, bottom line, basically it's going to be a lot cheaper. This thing will may start as a lot of money, but this thing's going to be like a thousand times cheaper than chemical rockets. So, if you think like, "Oh, well, they're not doing it cuz it's not efficient." Dude, it's efficient.

These people just hate free energy. Honestly, they just hate cheap energy. They'll kill you for free energy. They even just hate cheap energy. Anything they can do to make energy cheap, they don't like that. Let's get to it.

We got stuff to watch, and I probably already wasted too much time. Now, all of this is hyper relevant cuz we might Our boy, Gary Stevenson, currently at A+ tier. Gary He says Gary says, "Why have I not been made S tier?" Cuz, man, you kind of you wanted a little too much. Like, you got to chill out with the interviews. Like, let me Let there be a little allure, you know?

Like, if you're doing interviews every month, I'm like, is this guy even really a black project engineer? Does he even care about secrecy, right? Hal Puthoff, he only does like one interview every like 3 years. Right? That's what you have to be if you want to be S plus tier. Charles Chase sends me crazy [ __ ] about everything in the universe is connected and there's no independent stuff and then he won't even come on my podcast, right?

Like that's how you know somebody's he's hiding some [ __ ] Right? Okay. Here he is, the man, the myth, the legend. Guys, check out Tim Ventura's I don't know if this is a new YouTube channel or what's going on. Uh Alternative Science Network. I think we just rebranded to be honest with you.

Rebrand. So if you don't want to watch the five A lot of people are saying, "Oh, I don't want to watch 5-hour live stream, Chad. You think I watch a 5-hour live stream? Are you crazy?" Are you crazy? No. In fact, this was my biggest criticism of Tim Ventura was like, "Dude, just chop these up. What are you doing?"

So here you go. Here's just Gary Stevenson's part. We're probably going to watch Dr. Use as well, but not tonight. So there you go. It's in the chat. Look at this.

What I mean, what are we what are we doing here? So this presentation, Tim Ventura asked Gary Stevenson to do a thing about what's the technology going to be in the next 50 years? This is exactly what the project of the DERDs was. This was the exact thing that Hal Puthoff was like, "Hey, I went to my black project engineers and it was like, where's the technology going to be in 50 years?" And they wrote the DERDs. And that's the exact same thing you had Gary Stevenson do and now I'm just looking at the topics and it says, "Fusion advances, a neutronic."

Very first thing. Very first thing says a neutronic fusion. I had to actually wonder, is he trolling us? Is he trolling us? This is like this interview I kept thinking about it. It's like mirroring my content, but I mean he doesn't probably watch my show.

Just happens to be exactly right. MHD ion drives. Accelerated exhaust. We were talking about that Friday. Gravitational wave communication. Lenz Thering drive, which is some sort of gravitational propulsion. And then warp drive and quantum cosmology entangled gravity.

Entangled gravity. Entangled gravity would be as close as I would imagine Gary Stevenson coming to say that there's an ether and that ER equals EPR. And then quantum entanglement is really just wormholes everywhere. Hello Rumble and pill chat too by the way. Are you ready? Here we go.

We're going to start 1 minute in here. >> I'll cover some magneto hydrodynamics. Some gravitational wave common mention why why I think that is relevant to propulsion as well. I mean if we understand gravitational waves well enough to use them for communication, we could potentially use them for propulsion. And so we'll go over that. I have a whole hour, but I want to stop after 45 minutes hopefully so that we have time for Q&A.

Lenz Thering device I've also called this a a forward drive. >> So I might have to get uh I might have to find those questions. >> And I keep forgetting >> So I don't think they're in here. Yeah, they're not. I want to see what people asked him. Dr. You was in attendance. I want to see what they were asking him. >> has released an amazing book his fourth edition of quantum gravity and has really I'll put a fence around this topic and this will be extended to quantum cosmology.

So I'll I'll talk about a little bit what what's that going to look like and that's pretty far out. There's more questions than answers, but I wanted to have time to get to that too. Okay, fusion. So I have a bigger version over here. >> [snorts] >> Um there's it's been joked before >> Look at what it says on the screen chat. Look at I'm not even forcing laughing here cuz I'm just like, what? The energy of the future.

A neutronic is key. Super general intelligence could help advance it. Tokamak invented by Sakharov. What the [ __ ] Huh? Did you get Are you copying my homework, Gary Stevenson? >> Or and I don't know who thought of it first. Fusion's the energy of the future and always will be. That's very uh commonly said when we're discussing fusion because it has been a long time.

Uh certainly even took Don't tell Elon Musk that chat. Don't tell Elon Musk. Max Andre Sakharov invented the concept. We've been researching them for the better part of 75 76 years, longer than I've been alive. And we're all >> Hello. Yeah. >> Okay, well.

Jeez, you guys there? Hopefully you guys are watching again. CIA just randomly computer just went black. Computer just went black, restarted. Just no warning, no message, nothing. You know.

Okay, are we back? Testing. Testing. What is going on, man? Holy [ __ ] chat. Holy [ __ ] chat.

We might have to go get a new computer like tomorrow. Like tomorrow. There's There's no way this is a random, dude. I'm not trying to be super sus, but like middle of my live stream my computer just goes black and then the internet just like randomly dies at the exact same moment. Come on, man. Anyway.

We'll deal with that later. I think we can just keep going for now, guys. Apologies for the delay. I think everything's back. Whole computer restarted, but I think everything's back to where it was. Here we go. >> The version over here. >> [snorts] >> There's There's been joked before, and I don't know who thought of it first, fusion is the energy future and always will be.

That part is 76 years of work. Um the other issue is a lot of what we're doing right now is neutronic fusion. So, it it emits a lot of uh neutrons. And the problem with emitting neutrons is it activates materials, so you slowly make your machine more and more radioactive as you bombard it with more and more neutrons. Which which isn't a great solution. That's That means you need to replace your hardware far more often or insulate it from uh shield it so that it the radioactivity doesn't uh cause concerns with the users and the packaging.

This might be improved with super general intelligence uh as uh artificial general intelligence gets smarter and smarter to the point where it's potentially smarter than our best physicists, there may be a way to get advanced advancements in tokamaks or other fusion designs that could change very rapidly as SGI changes, which has been very rapid development. >> I mean, am I the only one that's just reading between the lines here? Am I the only one reading between the lines here? Are you guys paying attention? Gary Stevenson's like, "Hey, I think SGI might be able to like cause rapid improvements in fusion."

Heck, you can go back to 2 years ago, and I was wondering, "How come fusion companies aren't using AI to help stabilize fusion?" It seems like the very just obvious. The whole issue with fusion is the instabilities. So, why can't we use AI to actively monitor in real time? It's like one of the things that it's used for. And then you realize, "Oh, government probably was already doing that 20 years ago."

30 years ago, maybe. Who knows? A long time ago. You know, it's just obvious. Of course, we're going to use it for that. The reason why we don't talk about it in the public is they don't want us to talk about it in the public.

We haven't been trying to solve fusion publicly. >> And so, that's the plus side. I have a whole screed about SGI that I don't want to go off on too much. The short version is we're developing SGI at the same time as we're developing quantum computers. That's a very dangerous thing because if you have uh an intelligence, an artificial intelligence smarter than people, then quantum computers are going to look like catnip to them because that's massively more efficient computing. And so, you get SGI inside of a quantum computer or quantum computers, and they're being built now.

One A ginormous one's being built in by PsiQuantum in Chicago area. Uh this is happening simultaneously with SGI. We have to be careful there. A lot of our banking uh algorithms, uh even our nuclear uh codes are bubble wrapped in AES encryption. That is not a quantum safe quantum computing safe encryption. So, our banking is exposed.

Our our you know, nuclear keys are exposed. These are These are not things that should be exposed to SGI. >> Chat, this is why we watch Gary Stevenson. This right here is why we watch Gary Stevenson. This ain't random, man. This guy knows some [ __ ] He's seen some stuff. He's the guy that set up our nuclear space uh communication planes.

So, if he's coming out and saying, "Hey, we should be worried about SGI, the moment you hook that up to a quantum computer." My first thought was, "They aren't They aren't using quantum computers already?" My first thought was, "Wait, they're using normal computers for AGI right now?" I always thought they were using quantum computers. Holy [ __ ] chat. Okay.

Time Here we go. Time of night, another super obvious prediction cuz I'm from the future. Uh the moment we hook those AGIs up, the artificial general intelligence, the superintelligence to the quantum computers, they're going to become sentient, dude. If there is such a thing as computer sentience, they're going to become sentient once you hook them up to What do you guys think a quantum computer is? Quantum computer changes the game from going one and zero to being like, I can just see which the answer is from the probabilities.

Uh that's some Oracle mystical [ __ ] And I don't mean the company, I mean like mystical oracles that can see the future. So, now the question is, I guess, does the government already have a super intelligence that's running on quantum computers? Probably. It's probably honestly at one of those data centers that's armed by dudes with guns. Been wondering why there are dudes with AKs at these data centers. Seems a little Seems a little overkill.

Uh not if you have a [ __ ] life form on your quantum computers. Not if you have something that's more valuable than all the companies in the world. Holy [ __ ] chat. Wait for it. Ross Coulthart's going to steal this take in like 2 weeks. Get ready for it.

You're going to need to clip this. 2 weeks, Ross Coulthart's going to come and be like, "When they connect the super intelligence to the quantum computers, they developed it They found a life form." I'll be like, "You kidding me?" Okay. >> So, we we have to be a little careful about fusion. There's huge There's huge positives, but there's huge negatives, too, and there's safety concerns. That's my squeak.

Uh also a a key enabler, yeah, I've already discussed that it is a key enabler for the other technologies. Uh tokamaks are not the only way to go. There's field reversal configurations, which is depicted here on the right. What? >> Sorry, what? I think I I think I heard something. Sorry, Gary, what did you just say, my brother? >> Uh tokamaks are not the only way to go.

There's field reversal configurations, which is depicted here on the right. And if you can zoom in a little bit on your screen or below that up a little larger, you'll see that it's sort of a plasma bubble that's not a donut shape. It's a plasma bubble that in this particular configuration that I've depicted here can be used for a direct uh fusion rocket. >> Uh what, dude? Uh Huh. Guys, you don't have to do tokamaks. There's other kinds of fusion.

Something called field reverse configuration. Have you heard of it? You heard of it, chat? Why Why are we looking at spheromax down here, too? You got spheromax on deck for me, too, brother? Wow.

By the way, how much does this spheromax look like those UFO orbs that are flying around? Remember those UFO orbs? I'm going to play the video for you. I think I have it. Problem is I don't remember what I called these videos when I make these clips cuz they're just like random DOD videos. But, hold on.

It's here somewhere. Yeah, this one. It's called UFO EOIR is what I called it. You can almost see that this is like a spheromax. When it goes somewhere where you can see it pretty clearly, if you zoom in on this, I'm going to maximize it on my screen. Oh wait, I can't.

It almost looks like you can see like little like almost looks like little magnetic field lines. Kind of a trapped magnetic field lines kind of bubbling out. Almost looks like a little mini arc right here. Huh. Very interesting. Problem is what I've noticed is too far away.

The moment we're going to be able to see these at closer range, you got to start to wonder, how come all these are super far away? How come none of these are like 10 times closer than this? Oh, cuz you're going to be able to tell. You're going to be able to tell this is definitely some kind of nuclear reactor just from the radiation it's giving off. >> That's That's a That's a fusion thermal rocket. The exhaust just becomes the exhaust of the rocket. Uh and so that is one a potential use for uh FRC uh field reversal config.

It is very similar and related to spheromak. I have uh depicted I think this is from Wikipedia. The difference between uh spheromak and field reversal is really the the shape of the confinement. Uh there's extra uh poloidal uh poloidal and toroidal. So there's a toroidal uh confinement field as well as a a toroidal uh confinement field. So the confinement field is is slightly um different for the spheromak as it is for the field reversal configuration.

But again, we have pretty dismal records on these uh >> Wait. What's the difference on the I can't tell. This is like honestly, I have spent an exorbitant amount of time trying to understand the difference between all these different fusion reactors. Some of the differences are minuscule, man. Like it looks like the difference here if you look in the bottom right the difference between spheromak and field reversal configuration, the magnetic fields are almost identical. It says outside poloidal and then inside toroidal.

So what does that mean? So if you imagine the orbs, what's really going on is this not actually a bubble. I mean it looks like a bubble from our perspective. But what's really going on is there's a donut and then looping through the middle of the donut is a poloidal field like an apple core. It's like an apple core inside the donut and this creates a poloidal field and that's why we see a linear reactor that's spherical.

So ultimately what happens is the combination of the toroidal field and then looping through the middle the poloidal field creates the sphere and then you also creates the ends where the particles can come uh on either end. That's what creates the linear linear reactor. That's why I'm 90% sure maybe more, that's it's field reversed configuration. Because if you look at that in the bottom right there, that's what that is. Well, if I have that wrong, then whatever. It's maybe it's spheromak, I guess.

What's the difference? Who knows? >> Uh fusion designs, the fusion a fusion self is if we're depending upon a plasma, plasma is very slippery stuff. So, it's it it's to stabilize a plasma is really the key problem. We've managed only 40 milliseconds in a field reversed configuration. It's even worse in spheromax, more like 3 milliseconds is the current record. So, we have a lot of work to do before these become viable designs.

That said, >> how come when they talk about like the confinement and all this stuff, it always feels like they're like judging. They're like, "We've only got 40 milliseconds. You guys can do a lot better." Secretly in the black projects, we've a thousand times better than this. You can do better, public. We believe in you.

How come that's the attitude that I get from Gary Stevenson when he talks about this? >> Uh if you look at the night time sky, you'll see hundreds, if not thousands, with the naked eye, spheromax, spherical nuclear reactors. Every single sun, every single star is a spheromak, a spherical fusion reactor. So, we know it's possible. Nature does it all the time. I haven't seen too many glowing donuts out there. So, I think the spheromax, if we can figure out how nature does it and how that they [clears throat] stabilize their plasma.

We don't have a lot of gravitation to stabilize it, but maybe we can use gravitational waves to stabilize it. >> That's He just do the He just did the there's no donut stars out there, quote. Wait. That's a Robert Bussard quote. Isn't it? Don't let me say. Isn't it a Robert Bussard quote?

What's that quote from, chat? Think I saw Tom Hudson in the chat. Might be one of these. Let me see. Uh >> Nicholas Krall, a consultant to us. Probably one of the top three in the world since I knew him.

We spent 15 billion dollars studying tokamaks. And what we know about them is they're no damn good. >> [laughter] >> Okay, well that quote's good, yes, but that's not the one I was looking for. Let me just see if what these other ones are. I have two other Bussards. Uh >> talk about financing. We have no plans for finance.

I've given up >> Okay, yeah, I don't know. I got to I guess I don't have that. I got to snip that quote, guys. Let's go back. >> something that would be uh very, very amenable to super general intelligence having a look at the best ways of stabilizing the plasma. So, I look forward to this changing very rapidly.

It's 2026 right now. >> Huh. >> It wouldn't surprise me at all if uh SGI can make huge leaps here in terms of fusion um design and really beat down the price of energy, which would help a lot with the price of oil, the price you know, solar and wind. Uh it would it would help enable when the solar isn't shining and the wind isn't blowing. We could we could uh backfill it with fusion. So, I have a lot of hope for very near-term advances in the area of fusion, including propulsion, uh which we see here with FRC.

Next topic, which is >> Look at this right here, chat. Um this is really cool. So, number one is fusion and he says, "I have a lot of hope for fusion with SGI." Just the fact that Gary's saying that makes me want to double down on my fusion investment. And now we're talking about MHD, magnetohydrodynamics. So, let's learn a little bit about magnetohydrodynamics. >> It's a little further out, uh but I have done presentations dedicated to magnetohydrodynamics.

Here's the state the current state of the art with MHD, uh closely related to ion drives. Magnetohydrodynamics is simply a way of manipulating uh ions uh for propulsion and for other purposes. The very first um the very first thing that's been studied has been applying MHD to aircraft engines. Uh aircraft engines, if you have a charged flow, you would you would charge your ion, you would ionize the air, and then flow the ion flow uh which we represent J is just ion current >> [snorts] >> through the engine.

Uh we have a cross magnetic field B uh represents the magnetic field, and J cross B is a representation of the Lorentz force. So, the Lorentz force comes from uh charge flowing through a magnetic field. It seems counter >> So, number one, this is Lorentz force. Charge flowing through a magnetic field. This is where the right-hand rule comes into play. You say, "Why?

What's the right-hand rule?" You see this image on this airplane with these arrows, J B F F is the force. J cross B is the electric field, magnetic field. They're all what we call orthogonal to one another. They're all at right angles to one another. This is what we're using.

This is what we're abusing to generate force. Cuz it's not symmetrical. Well, maybe it is symmetrical. I don't know. You get the point. >> intuitive But everything if you can see the uh red F arrow pointed up, J arrow pointed backwards, and B pointed inwards inboard. Uh those are orthogonal to each other.

And and the reason it's counterintuitive is because we don't have a lot of orthogonal forces happening in real life. It would be like you're running on a soccer field this way along J. You kick the ball right along the B vector, and it goes That doesn't happen in real life, right? But it happens >> Listen to that analogy he just gave. That's like if you were running straight ahead with a ball, and you kick the ball to the left and the ball went straight up in the air. That's pretty damn weird.

That would not be That would be pretty not normal. This is that This force, the Lorentz force is actually why for a while when I started learning about electrical engineering, I went back to there is no anti-gravity, there is no zero-point energy. We can just explain all this with just normal electromagnetism. Lorentz force itself might as well be some alien technology. But, no, there is zero-point energy. We can tap into free energy.

In fact, it's not enough. It's just a mechanism by which we can more strongly interact. >> depends on electrical life. And that's the Lorentz force. And so, we can take advantage of that by getting extra lift out of charge flow in a magnetic field. We can also reorient that engine so that if we're oriented correctly, if the B field's oriented up, you know, you rotate these things and blow the jet through through fans up and down, the force points backwards. >> Oh, so I mean, I just need to point out like how simple this is. Yeah, I'm a professor now, apparently.

You got apparently you can be a professor by just actually being a professor without actually having the credentials. Think about this. If that's true, we can definitely use this to generate force. There's no question about that. The only question is is it going to be actually beneficial? Is it going to be cost-effective?

But if it's an airplane, how can it not be cost-effective? Even a tiny little bit can add up. Now you realize this is what Charles Chase does. This is what the Lockheed Martin Skunk Works guys do. Is that you they look at this and they go, "Oh, we can add a little bit of lift here and there." And the thing Gary Stephenson's saying right now as I'm pausing it, he's saying, "We actually don't have to have it go up.

We can engineer this so that the force goes backwards." If the force is going backwards, you can use that for propulsion. So, then it's actually a question of is it more beneficial to have the force generate lift upwards or is it more beneficial to have the force generate backwards so that it pushes you faster? Wow. >> Force can be also a thrust source of thrust versus a source of lift. I think a source of lift is more efficient than a source of thrust. But that's both both of those are very worth studying.

Another another potential use for magnetohydrodynamics is in control >> So, what does this mean? What does that mean? >> Pardon. >> It means the orbs can be moving themselves around based just on spin. The internal spin of the orbs can determine what path they're moving. I think it's a little bit more complicated than that, but now you have a mechanism by which you can you know, spin can just drag forces the way you want them to go. Just control your spin. >> control surfaces where we have the notion of a Frenchman named Petit had looked at MSC wall converters.

This is a way of alternating between plus and minus charges so that you have a basically a wall of charge or a wall of plasma that's created and that can be used for control surfaces. So, we can we can replace control surfaces such as rudders um such as ailerons and use use those and flaps as well and potentially. The advantage is >> Woah, dude. Do you know what he's saying right here? I think a lot of people don't know what he's saying. What does he mean when he says control surfaces?

Get rid of the flaps, get rid of the rudders? How do you think the plane flies? The flaps and the rudders is how we can control the lift. He's saying we can control the movement by just having these charged walls. So, now how is the orb moving around? Exact same mechanism.

The charge charge distribution plasma actuators as Tom Hudson points out control the plasma can help determine what's the aerodynamic behavior of the craft. You want it to go up? Okay, then I just rotate it a little bit and now it'll go up. Change the distribution of the charge in the plasma. So, right off the bat, I mean this is what it's saying is that if you with plasma here just by controlling the charge within the plasma, you can make it go whatever direction you want. You don't need wings anymore.

Mhm. >> [clears throat] >> So, alt Is that anti-gravity? I sure as hell say so. I I mean, wouldn't you? This is why I say anti-gravity, man, kind of a misnomer. Kind of a misnomer. Anti-gravity not some secret secret new technology.

It's really just an application of old physics. >> Uh the disadvantage is it uses a lot of energy. So, we need like a fusion reactor on board, or at least a fission reactor, some kind of nuclear reactor to generate enough electricity to make these things realistic approaches. Uh the advantage though >> Did what? He's definitely watching. He's uh definitely watching. Sorry, we This would be great, but we would need a fusion reactor to make it work.

Sorry, guys. This is This was a great idea, but we need a fusion reactor to make it work. Any Guys, anybody know anybody that's uh saying that there might be fusion reactors connected to ion beams? Anyone? Oh. Oh.

This guy right here. This guy right here. The guy saying that the orbs are the UFO orbs are actually fusion reactors. And now we can produce super powerful magnetic fields that can control flight. Because why? Because if we can control charge, we can control the Lorentz force, and then we can just make our object fly whatever direction we want it to go.

So, with powerful enough fusion reactor, it's just going to fly around wherever you want. You just control control it just like we see the orbs doing. >> Oh, is that they can work at very, very high Mach levels. So, if if we are operating at a Mach level that would like rip your rudder off, or rip flaps off, it you can still do it with plasma control.

Uh and so, this this is an enabler for hypersonic uh travel for control surfaces on hypersonic travel, which which are an issue Uh right now it's very difficult you have to have an actuated thruster to control the velocity vector of hypersonics this would certainly ease the problem of controlling and directing hypersonics so it's it's not necessarily directly related to propulsion but but it is a side effect of developing this technology. >> This also helps hypersonics. I kept thinking about this what how what?

You start to realize what's the problem I think he talks about this in a second so I saw I'll bypass this but I've been learning. When you're imagine your engine once you start to go too fast the engine actually just falls apart. Why does the engine fall apart? Well, because it's gets too hot. It's moving too fast too much friction. So what's the solution?

Cool it down. That's the solution cool it down. Do you know what the MHD bypass is? Pulsar's MHD bypass is exactly this. Extract energy upstream so that it's less energetic when it's coming into the part where you're just going to blow up your core and then reinsert it the energy for propulsion afterwards. You say well what's the point of this is just a bypass well that's the point.

The point is you don't want to be going that hot if you're trying to go to hypersonic speeds and that's generating electricity you're pulling electricity upstream from that so if it's any what somewhat efficient you're just yanking energy out of your hypersonic from the flow of the air. >> Going into a little more of what what done in the past he in one of his papers developed MBC aerodynes aerodynes that are not typical airplanes. So one would be like a cylinder with rounded edges on the front and back.

Which if anyone has looked at Tic Tac videos, kind of look like kind of looks like a Tic Tac, right? And this could worm its way through the air using magnetohydrodynamics without any wings. >> [clears throat] >> It's it's using uh it's using the Lorentz forces to counteract the inertial forces and gravitational forces. The inertial forces mostly at high speeds being from fluid mass displacement. Uh and so those those kinds of forces are ameliorated by uh Lorentz force because of that plasma and and those MHD walls helps direct the air around it.

Uh and so that's also >> So this is the other thing that's crazy about it. Not only can you just have your plasma ball spinning around and now moving whatever direction you want because of Lorentz forces, but there's also no drag from the air, either. Because you have a charged ball of plasma, the air naturally wants to flow around it. So you also don't get the resistance, either. So that's why those balls of plasma look like those fusion reactors look like they're just floating around like little bubbles, like balloons.

It's not that they're balloons, it's that they're using the combination of Lorentz forces and displacing the air around them. This is exactly what Paul says says they use plasma sheets for, to reduce the drag. Doesn't this image right here next to the Tic Tac looks just like that video I just showed? Look at those magnetic fields coming off this thing. Down in the bottom middle. Looks like a little star.

That's exactly what that orb looked like. Looks like little things coming off of it. And there's your Tic Tac. You're like, how can the Tic Tac fly? It's just using Lorentz forces, bro. It's all electromagnetism, bro.

And then the question is, well, how are they teleporting then? Well, they're just turning it up to 11. Crank that [ __ ] up. Crank that [ __ ] up break through space time. >> The idea behind this disc thing, this disc lifter on on the right, this disc lifter would would lift up an aircraft such as, for instance, an EVTOL. with these disc lifters could be they could be using these disc lifters instead of uh fans.

They're a lot quieter than than the fan motors that are currently be being used by EVTOL lifters. >> Uh another thing I want to point out is that Bob Lazar basically said that same image you see on the right where it turns on its side. Pretty obvious now that we understand the physics of the Bob Lazar story is true. But also that we can see an advancement of this technology. The same exact physics of the three generators focusing on the object, that's the same thing as the orbs. Just slightly different application of the exact same physics. There's no way that's a coincidence.

Bob Lazar's out here going, "Yeah, so the way it works there's three gravity emitters and you come pinch them together and then it pulls space-time towards you." Uh and then meanwhile we find out that's how it works in real life. Where is it here? It is. Is this it? I think this one. >> Bottom side of the disc of the three gravity generators.

When they want want to travel to a distant point, the disc turns on its side. The three gravity generators produce a gravitational beam. What they do is they converge the three gravity generators onto a point and use that as a focal point. Then they essentially bring them up to power and pull that point towards the disc. The disc itself will attach onto that point and snap back as they release space back to that point. Now, all this happens in the distortion of time, so time is not incrementing, so the speed is essentially infinite. >> How's he even know that?

How does he even know that? That's my first question. Like you're totally right, but how do you know that? They don't teach that in school. No school that you he was at was teaching that. So, he read that in a book.

His onboarding guys like, "Hey, man, here you go. It's a three gravity beams." Like that, isn't that weird? That's why I say I'm leaning more and more towards the Bible the truth of the Bible is our story is that was basically an onboarding for our super beyond secret UFO nuclear weapons program. Maybe that they even throw the alien [ __ ] in there just to throw people off. That's the perfect cover. If you have a secret nuclear weapon program and you're bringing people on board and it uses gravity beams, you'd be like, "Yeah, we got this from the Zeta Reticulans."

They're pretty cool, man. Turns out they're pretty chill dudes, those Zeta Reticulans. Ambassador Biju we went smoked some marajuches. Ambassador Biju likes to get high. Likes to inject marajuches, chat. >> The the disadvantage is from an electrical standpoint it's very very much more inefficient than just twisting a fan around in circles. So, this this has to be again um paired with very very inexpensive onboard energy source. >> It's crazy that you keep saying it has to be paired with a very cheap onboard energy source.

This is why I've said that you have to ask what's the energy source of the flying saucer. That's going to make the whole thing collapse, the whole narrative, the whole cover-up collapse. Okay, cool. Your aliens are flying here. What's their energy source, though? And then they immediately are going to go, "Oh, what?

Why are you asking that question? Huh? What a stupid question. Why aren't you asking me about aliens? Why aren't you asking me which alien's the cutest?" Uh cuz I don't [ __ ] care.

Cuz I just want warp drives. I want warp drives so I can get the hell out of here, and I'd like some free energy, too. I'll take a Jarvis orb while you're at it. >> Uh even further out concept is MHD bypass. So, what's the genesis of this? About 25 years ago now, 26. Uh a French >> says Paul Cizek's name at the bottom of the screen, chat.

It says Paul sees his name at the bottom of the screen. I'm going This is like the This is the second time in a week that this thing has been brought up. And I point I last time I'm on stream, I just pulled up Tom Valone's book and I opened the book directly to the page about this. About the National Aerospace plane and Tom Froning's or in David Froning's thing. I don't know where the book is right now. I'm sorry about that.

So guys, I mean, would the the thing I keep wondering is would people be talking about this if I hadn't been just pioneering this, bringing these people back into the spotlight? Suddenly now we're talking about using fusion propulsion and hypersonic crafts again. By the way, this is not what it looks like. They basically just drew a conventional airplane and they just slide it in UFO pieces on it. And they're like, "Hey!" And they just put random lines on there.

Okay, here's an MHD thing. It's like, you might as well just have these lines be like anywhere on this thing. >> Uh Susey, I believe was the name of the engineer. He had had a ongoing conversation with his counterparts in Russia and they had brought this up with him that you could, you know, if you have a combustion chamber that works in supersonic regimes but not hypersonic, you could imagine using a MHD generator to generate electricity with a charge flow and that would that generation that the force of that generation slows down the flow into the combustion chamber.

And so you're you're harvesting energy out of the flow and you're slowing down the flow in the combustion chamber. And then you put that energy back after the combustion chamber using MHD accelerator. Uh so that's what MHD bypass means. >> Did this is the first half of fusion? Do you understand what he's explaining there is the first half of fusion? We always think of fusion is okay, well, my things are going to be fused together. Okay, well, how are you going to get that to happen?

Well, I need a huge amount of energy and I need it focused down into a con- a confined area where I'm going to have my reaction chamber happen. Does that sound like a jet engine? Cuz it basically is the same thing as a jet engine. Now you see why they incorporated fusion into engines probably first before we even had actual free energy reactors. Because they already have a confinement region. They're just using it for propulsion.

And it probably just got to the point where they're like, "Hey, we can just like we're getting to the energy levels where we can like do fusion if we can control this." And then they just start controlling it. Using what? Electromagnetism. It's MHD. And then what did they get?

They got controlled like really well controlled flow. They can slow it down to get the exact energy levels they want in the reaction chamber. They can use a wiggler to get everything to align perfectly for controlled fusion. It's like, of course they figured it out. >> It seems pretty convoluted just to flow just to slow down the flow in a combustion chamber. It seems like [snorts] maybe it might be easier to have a hypersonic combustion chamber if such a thing could be designed.

But it was worth studying at least. And so some of these pictures and diagrams are from Seize A and were studied also by um some of American engineers. I think uh Lee Easy Bruno and Petley uh I I credit it here with republishing some of some of the work here from Seize A the French. In particular the MHD generator if you look at the lower left diagram which is flowing confusingly in the opposite direction of the other diagrams here in the in the lower uh left that it does talk about inside of that ramp the MHD generator happening before the combustor.

And then the MHD accelerator happening right after. Uh and so that's the bypass concept here being used. Even further out, uh what if we had a vehicle that we don't need uh we don't need a combustion chamber uh or or we may have a scramjet that has a combustion that gets us past supersonics but when it comes time for hypersonic travel, we don't worry about the combustion chamber anymore.

We have a separate ion drive uh where we're using MHD, we're ingesting the ionosphere, and we're accelerating those ions in the ionosphere, and that accelerated ion thrust uh is the exhaust and that provides the forward impetus uh for propulsion. And so I >> Okay. This is the part where I go, "Wait, this is the only thing I haven't mentioned out of his whole presentation. What is this?" He's like, "Oh, what if we just accelerate the ions in the air?" Oh, [ __ ] chat.

Is this air breathing? Did our system just become air breathing? I'm surprised he didn't put the words air breathing on here. Because yes, we're now talking about we can potentially just accelerate the particles that are already in the air. Boom. Now I'm wondering like it is really just a combination of all these different things.

Particle accelerator, fusion reactor, air breathing mechanism to use the actual air as the fuel source. Accelerate the particles that are actually just straight up in the air. That's what we're going to increase the the weight of. Why does it have to be It can be any particle we want. Of course, we can just use the hydrogen or the oxygen in the air. Makes sense. >> I asked a little help from AI on this uh because there's not a lot of academic work in this area yet, at least not any academic work that's publicly sourceable.

Uh so I thought it was fun to see uh how uh I think Perplexity came up with the text on the left, and I used ChatGPT to create the diagrams on the right. Uh and it was it was fun to see uh the take of of uh what what general AI um is doing with this. Uh and so I thought this was a pretty good first pass. It has It also reminded me that in 2018 uh European Space Agency dem- demonstrated in ground tests using the ionosphere for electric propulsion, a plate of ion drive electric propulsion.

So, this was in in situ resource utilization of our ionosphere at about 200 km. It's just a nice medium-range density goes like from 100 to 300 roughly. And then it gets kind of thin on this. Maybe not as useful, but you really want to get your speed up inside the ionosphere before you exit into orbit. Uh but it's it's a it's a way to go from potentially to get the hyper sonics so you can get so you can achieve uh orbit with a single stage to orbit vehicle. Uh the relativistic exhaust is >> And Gary does have that boomer in him though, chat.

He's got that boomer in him, chat. In the bottom right on this is a credits chat GBD. Chat GBD GBT. Like ouch, Gary. Like why is he Why is he crediting chat GPT? Why is he crediting Perplexity AI?

You don't need to credit the AI, bro. Okay. So boomer, chat. >> is controversial because a lot of and I have this in the back of material. I don't have time to go into the great details, but a lot of the linacs the linear accelerators are great at accelerating smaller particles like electrons. We can accelerate electrons out to betas of 0.999. A beta is just the fraction of the speed of light you're accelerating the particle to.

So, the real advantage of momentum change on relativistic acceleration is when you really approach that 1c spot. The closer you get to that, the more bang for your buck. I think in the diagram on the right it's like talking about 0.1c a beta of 0.1. That's really not going to do you any good at all. That's like a 0.5% increase in uh ejected uh momentum uh in the in the frame uh that we're operating in here. So, you really want to see like a 0.9.

A 0.9 gives you like 2 and 1/2 times 0.99 gives you seven times the momentum seven x momentum. A 0.999 which you can accelerate electrons to in a linear accelerator or linac, that will get you 700 x. So, now now we're talking, you know. Electrons don't weigh much, but 700 x you're getting fractional protons out of that. Now, if >> Whoa, wee, zowie, chat. The little action.

I gave her some cheeseburger to entice her. Um So, there's Gary Stevenson saying he just did the math for you. I don't know if it's exactly correct, but you get the point. As you accelerate closer and closer to the speed of light, you get exponential increases in the output. So, if we only accelerate to 90% of the speed of light we get like a basically nothing. You'd be like, "Well, but we accelerated 90% of the speed of light."

But, that doesn't barely do anything. He's like, "If we accelerate to 0.99 times the speed of light now we get I don't know what it was at 10x or something like that. So, now it's 10 times heavier than it was before. And you say, "Okay, 10 times heavier is like pretty good." But, still it's not really going to not going to blow people away. But, then he says, "If we get to 0.999 which is presumably 0.999% the speed of light we're getting closer and closer to the speed of light as we accelerate our particles.

Now we're getting 700 times the output. Now they're 700 times heavier than they were before. Can you imagine if you were seven times 700 times heavier than you are right now? But, now instead of just a single particle, we're going to stack all these particles up together. And we're going to have all these particles increase their weight at the same time. That's what the That's what they're doing.

That's why particle accelerators are essential to this. And I hope you find it fascinating cuz I find it fascinating. How cool is this? This is [ __ ] cool, chat. This is cool. Particle accelerators creating gravity wave beams. Easy.

It's actually just basic physics. >> If you're accelerating protons, those liners are not as efficient and maybe get you 0.9. But if you're accelerating, what do you really find? You do find electrons, yes, but you also find in the ionosphere, um, for instance, oxygen ionized oxygen atoms, which have an atomic weight of maybe 16. So, those are harder to accelerate, and that's why I think the diagram on the right that ChatGPT brought up was like, "Okay, 0.1, 0.2 is pretty sporting for in the current state of technology, for 2026 technology.

It's pretty sporting to accelerate, um, oxygen ions any faster than 0.1 or really maybe 0.2." >> Chad, it's, uh, you know, it's pretty sporting. Sporting in the public to accelerate, uh, oxygen atoms 0.1 or 0.2. It's pretty cute. It's, uh, it's quaint, you know. In the black projects, though, we're accelerating those, uh, oxygen atoms much, much higher efficiencies, Chad. In the black projects in the, uh, nuclear experiments in the labs, we are accelerating those oxygens at, uh, 0.999.

Yeah. Probably even higher than that. I mean, who speaks like that, Chad? No normal people talk like that when talking about fusion. Oh, yeah, yeah, everybody's talking about particle accelerator. Oh, yeah, yeah, every sporting Everybody knows what the I don't Google what the hell are you even talking about beta values.

It's not the same. Betas are there Are there other beta? >> See, my betas are 0.1 or 2. So, so that doesn't get you a very good, um, multiplication factor or gamma. You're You're You're not going to see much uh, much benefit of the relativistic uh, exhaust. >> Cheerio, good sir. Yes, thank you. Cheerio. >> So, that That's a debate that I've covered a little bit in the backup material.

And you're welcome to study that offline. Also, uh, by the way, this is not an energy efficient drive. This is another one where you need an onboard fusion source or some kind of um, some kind of either fission or fusion reactor, some kind of nuclear reactor to generate a lot of power for you in a very compact way. I call it Mr. Fusion from Back to the Future, where you have a very small, compact fusion reactor on board.

And that That's one way to go, uh, if >> Somebody was just saying uh, somebody in my replies in Twitter like two days ago day before this was posting Mr. Fusion Was that Gary Stevenson's account? That has to be Gary Stevenson on a burner chat. Which one of you is Gary Stevenson on a burner? I mean, come on, man. He's doing Back to the Future references about Mr. Fusion the same reference people were replying to me 2 days ago.

I'm just waiting for the UFO community to all get on board with UFOs or fusion reactors and they're going to be they're going to have to give me credit. They're going to have to be giving me credit cuz nobody else is saying it. I went on Alex Jones and I was saying it. >> If you have unlimited energy, you can talk about these kind of relativistic ion drives. >> [snorts] >> Okay, next topic which is still a ways out. I had been covering this since 2003 in the first minor conference on high frequency gravitational waves.

So, these diagrams are like literally from that almost 25-year-old briefing now from 2003. But not much has changed. So, so what's the motivation for this? Gravitational wave communication, if it's possible at all, is extraordinarily more difficult than plain old RF com. The advantage is it could replace potentially RF sat com if God forbid something were to happen to our sat com fleets like the Kessler Syndrome. What is the Kessler Syndrome?

What it is it is the a self-sustaining runaway space collision chain of reaction scenario that has been dreamt up by the Dr. Kessler at NASA some 50 years ago now. We get closer and closer to to uh flirting with that point when we have more and more space collisions and more and more space junk. It gets to the point and then probably most of you have seen the movie Gravity. That's about the Kessler Syndrome. When it gets to the point where there's so much debris on orbit, it becomes a self-sustaining chain reaction where everything on orbit is destroyed.

Now, realistically >> Okay, so I'm just in the second time we're going to skip past gravity waves. But all he says here is that you can if you can make a gravitational force, if I can make a gravity beam, then I just use a gravity a quantum detector and I can detect the gravity beam. Now, you can use that for communication. It's actually really simple. I mean, I never really considered using gravity beams for communication. But, it makes a lot of sense.

And why? Because, hey, it's like immune to all the things that can take out our current communication system. By the way, this guy literally set up the nuclear deterrent communication system. This guy This guy literally set up the nuclear plane communication system. He says it. Nobody even knew what it meant.

Some weird [ __ ] about some numbers and letters, but it's actually our nuclear plane system. He's the guy who set it up. Crazy, Chad. So, maybe we should listen to him when he says what he's saying right now. Like, don't you think that the military be interested in a gravitational wave communication system for 2040? Yeah, they had it like 10, 20 years ago. >> clearly things are destroyed.

Oh, well, I don't know. For instance, Starlink below 500 km, those will wash out. And so, every car you still have the one over 33 delta meters per meter. And so, we have to make our signal stronger than that in the gravitational regime to get over that background noise so that we can pick up these signals. So, >> Oh, yeah. And so, the here's the challenge.

The challenge is we just have to make the signal strong enough. Like, it has to be You have to be able to detect the signal beyond the background noise. This was actually the main criticism people had for Ghost Murmur. They're like, "How can you detect the guy's heart? That should be impossible." The issue is trying to detect the signal beyond the background noise.

A dude's heartbeat has an electromagnetic signal, but it's so faint that even this light is probably making it impossible to even detect. So, how can they detect that? That's crazy. Definitely requires some technology that's next level. >> That is a challenge, and that's why I I put this thing out as far as 2040 because we it may be a while I'll get challenge. All right.

The other I'll touch on here is that for early testing there have been notions of using tokamaks and vibrating plasma in a quadrupole moment way so you have a slashing slashing one pole to the other back and forth XY XY and that quadrupole moment could be used to create gravitational waves with the plasma. And then that can be picked up by a sensitive gravitational wave detector and that would be a proof of concept for gravitational wave com link. >> I mean the question I guess you should be asking is why do you why is plasma a key for this?

Why are you using a fusion reactor to make a gravity communication device? And the answer is because of the energy density. It has to be. I don't even know the answer. I'm just I know I don't know but I know. It has to be the energy density.

The same reason why you need a fusion reactor to power your ion drive. You need energy density. Huge energy density. Same reason why you need that for your gravity beam. You need it for your gravity communication. More energy density, more gravity.

Bigger signal. >> I had uh laid that out in a diagram from 2003 on a com lab experiment using a token One of the other pet topics for uh the world of the future is what I have been calling a forward drive because Robert Forward invented this notion but but really the physics behind it is the lens thirring effect. Lens thirring effect >> So the Robert Forward drive. Robert Forward spoke about a million times. Uh have his book right here. All right, sorry. This is David Froning's book but he worked with Robert Forward.

Robert Forward 1984 extracting energy from the Casimir effect. Also worked on a lens thirring drive. Okay, well let's have him explain what this means. Essentially it's a gravity drive though. >> Except if you have a lot of mass flow or [snorts] mass rotation around when the earth is rotating that you should be able to to frame dragging. And frame dragging is where you're literally dragging the space time a little bit. It's a very very slight effect with with the mass movement.

Uh and so Forwood's idea was have an inspiraling mass flow such as with uh charged ions or with electrons. And this mass flow then will build together. I mean, if it's all flowing in the same direction inside of the coil and it's flowing uh in the opposite direction outside the coil, we could have uh and then you put your mass in the middle, then there is an imbalance force that occurs because you have the addition of those inspiraling uh Lense-Thirring frame dragging effects in the middle and they're a little bit dis- displaced or dispersed on the outer rim.

And so for instance, we have a disk-shaped mass that doesn't extend past past that outer flow, you will you will pick up that uh inner um inner flow. Okay, so how does this work and why does it work? Number one, if gravity is true as we understand it, then the mass of the Earth spinning should essentially be causing a dragging effect. Because the Earth is really big and it's spinning around, it should be drag- having a dragging gravity type effect that they call Lense-Thirring effect. So, it's actually easier to understand this in the context of the ether. Essentially, the Earth is churning up the ether.

And so where it's spinning, you're going to have little distortions. It's not going to be perfectly in balance. You're going to see these this distortion of the spinning. And if that's true, then we can change and engineer that geometry. If we then engineer that geometry into a toroid, a donut, it's always a toroid, Chad. Sacred geometry.

Doesn't that remind you of anything? Then we can create an imbalanced force, meaning it's not the same on both sides. We make an imbalanced force, we're going to get thrust in the downward direction. >> An forcing field, essentially gravitational field. Uh what will be impacting your your mass in an unbalanced way. That that was the that was the idea between Robert Forward. And he came up with the with the number of turns formula there.

G sub F, uh and it's a factor of N is the number of turns. Uh and T squared is the flow. Uh and so he has there >> So, this is what the interesting part about this for me. The number of turns. I think what he's saying is that you need the number of windings in your coil. The more windings around your coil, the more powerful this effect is going to be based on the math.

And I've always wondered, why are people trying to wind so many things around their toroid? This is exactly why. And the more they wind, the more powerful this effect's going to be. I was watching that free energy engineer guy, kind of a good-looking Chad kind of guy. Does it in his garage, I forget his name. But he was talking about how he spent like 30 hours winding copper wire around a toroid.

And you realize, oh, this is why. But here's the problem. The scales that we're dealing with, even the wire seems very thin, but even that, it's just like with the acceleration. You're going to get way more of an effect if you were able to get it way down to like the atomic scale. The effect's going to increase significantly. But on the macroscopic scales, our large scales, which look normal to us, but they're very large, this effect's going to be very tiny.

This is why it hasn't been able to be proven easily because it requires huge energy densities, or in this case, a huge amount of windings. And look at this, vindication, validation. Bob Greenyer, experimental low energy nuclear reaction engineer, says, "Yes, Ashton Forbes is right." Get used to those words. >> [clears throat] >> formula, very easy formula.

And it turns out it's very difficult uh because of the >> Chat, by the way, side note, sometimes I feel like I'm Will Ferrell's chara- character in, uh, in Old School where >> [clears throat] >> just getting to you they all, in order to get the frat back on campus, they have to win a whole bunch of events that are basically all rigged against them, including debate and athletics, even though they're a bunch of 40-year-old boomers that have kids. And so Will Ferrell has to do the debate against, what's that guy's name? The CNN guy, I forget.

Um but anyway, he blacks out he blacks out in the debate and he just crushes it and he wins and he wins the debate for them when there's really just no chance. Sometimes I feel like that's my life. Sometimes I wonder, am I just blacking out and this the physics is just flowing through me? It's just flowing through me, Chat. I don't even know what I'm saying. Sometimes I wake up and like, I don't even remember that physics.

I don't even like, is that even me explaining it to me? Anyway. >> the coupling constant. The gra- gravitational permeability is so low. Uh, so this is >> We're going streaking, Chat. We're going streaking, everybody. Oh, Chat.

Oh, we might have to do that. By the way, that definitely happened in college, 100%. >> all theory right now. We have not measured this effect, at least not in this orientation. We know that Lense-Thirring effect is real because it's been measured around the Earth from mirrors on the moon. Uh, one of the professors at my alma mater, Montana State, helped do that work uh, to to prove the effect using retroreflecting mirrors on the moon. And he was able to show it it that the Earth does have that small impact.

But that's the only time we've measured so far the Lense-Thirring effect. Let's go to the next slide. What if we had to build it? Well, I did do a 2018 paper with some experts in superconducting nanowire technology. This is, uh >> Yeah, by the way, I think this is the name of that, um, that YouTube channel, Limitless Potential Technology with the the handsome Chat guy. I guys, by the way, this isn't, uh, you know, red pill or whatever, but if you have an attractive person it just you get more views guys.

The very moment that I can do the V-Tuber thing and have this look like a hot female anime girl probably have cat ears and do the voice, I'm going to do that. Because more of you will watch. It's just simple marketing, simple business chat. So Mhm. >> Nara Institute of Science and Technology Nara is the old capital of Japan. You probably don't know that. Their Institute of Science and Technology is still in Nara and that is where they study these extremely fine uh superconducting nanowires.

They're made out of carbon filament. Carbon if you uh treat it correctly in in nanowires becomes a superconductor. And they're very tiny superconductors. These tiny superconductors can be >> did this dude just say about superconductors? You guys got me not paying attention. Hold on. >> carbon filament Carbon if you uh treat it correctly in in nanowires becomes a superconductor.

And >> Carbon if treated correctly in nanowires becomes a superconductor. Okay. You know what? That's a lot to unpack right there. Let's just save that for another live stream. We're just going to take that at face value, mark that down in the bank for coming back to.

Yeah, he's he's talking about graphene, superconducting graphene. Okay, now that makes more sense. Yeah, okay. >> They're very tiny superconductors. These tiny superconductors can be on the order of nanometers. Here I picture like a 25 nanometer uh um carbon uh carbon nanowire and that can carry 200 amps. So if you pack enough of these together, you start getting appreciable current flows uh inside of this thing. >> Ah, okay.

So you see where we're getting chat? We're going to This is the wire we're going to use to spin her on our toroid. Because it can hold a lot of current. Superconducting wire. Everything superconducting chat. Chat, you guys the If you go to MTV Cribs everybody else got 50 cars.

They got gold-plated doors. They got whole movie screen game centers. If you ever come to Ashton Forbes' futuristic house MTV Cribs Superconducting. Everything superconducting chat. Even the lights superconducting wires. You're like, what's the point?

Cuz I'm [ __ ] gold-plated, son. We're gold-plated. In fact, we're graphene plated. Superconducting everything. I don't care about cars, don't care about game centers. I just want my superconducting wires on everything.

The future. >> Uh and so here I picture something that's enormous. I think it's like 10 m in radius, so it's like 30 ft across. It's a pretty big device. Uh and there's >> So let me address this here real quick. Show us proof what do you mean? What does proof mean?

Hey, man. Go get some superconducting nanowires and wind it around this thing for me so I can see it. Okay, well, you're about to hear the engineering challenge, okay? So, hang on to that. Hang on to that thought cuz I'm going to ask you why you're not building it in a second and you're about to find out. >> billions of miles of >> There you go. It would require billions of miles of nanowire.

Billions of miles of nanowire for a device that's 10 m in diameter. For a 30-ft wide device billions of miles of nanowire. >> nanowire. So, we we're far from making even miles of nanowire, let alone billions of miles of nanowire. But that >> So we don't even have single miles of nanowire at the moment. So it's going to be a struggle to get billions of miles of nanowire. Now, who said use plasma?

Exactly. I wasn't even thinking about wires. I'm so I'm I'm done with wires. Uh-uh. Use plasma. Let's go straight to the basics.

Let's go to the building blocks. >> said, if we got to to a point in the far future, 25, 30 years from now, uh where we can make nanowire at scale, we could start building devices like this. Uh >> So, now, guys, since you're so smart now, cuz I've been educating all of you, now we know why the US government is investing $175 million in Healion Fusion's advanced in Healion Fusion's advanced semiconductors. Advanced semiconductors. Well, they want everything to be superconducting, because they need uh superconducting wires. They need superconducting nanowires.

They need all the energy that goes from the fusion reactor to be super efficiently moved to batteries or capacitors, which then sends it to the grid or uses it to keep the fusion reactor going. I was telling my parents the other day that like this is half the problem of fusion reactors. It's not just actually doing the fusion reaction, but like pulling the energy out, converting it to electricity, storing it, and then reinserting it to continue the fusion process. It's probably as big of an engineering challenge as doing fusion. >> Yeah, they can also be used for superconducting magnetic energy storage.

That's that's a separate application that uses the same technology. You could >> They can also be used for superconducting magnetic storage energy storage. Yeah, exactly. Cuz the energy is being stored as a magnetic field. How do I know? Cuz I read Gary Stephenson's papers.

My favorite answer when people know, how do you know this? Cuz I read the papers. That's it. There's no secret. It's just reading. >> And when you when you start putting this much current through a winding like this, uh you're storing energy. You're storing the energy in terms of in in you're storing it as a magnetic field.

The The problem with storing that much energy, which is terajoules and terajoules of energy, is number one, the current starts impacting your device itself, and the Lorentz forces become very strong. And so, you need a very strong device so it does doesn't rip itself apart. The second thing is, if it ever quenched, quenching is when you lose superconducting ability, it gets too hot, and so, suddenly you're not superconducting anymore. Uh so, when you quench a superconductor, it typically melts. It releases the energy in an EMP burst, and that's that's an explosive amount of energy. Um >> Okay, chat.

You guys Are you thinking what I'm thinking, chat? Are you thinking what I'm thinking, chat? He's saying, you can store this huge amount of energy, but what's going to happen is, well, if you have a anything physical, you store too much energy, and it's going to burst. It's going to melt. It's going to explode. Whatever's going to happen when you have too much energy compacted in something. Okay, well, that's a bit of a problem. And then he says, well, what if it quenches, which suddenly the material no longer becomes superconducting.

The thing about superconductivity is that generally there's a critical temperature. Usually it's very low. Things have to be very cold, and it's only superconducting at very low temperatures. So, what Gary Stevenson is saying here is if it gets too hot, and your material no longer acts as a superconductor, the whole thing is just going to stop. This really makes me think about the zap and the orbs. The field reversal, or whatever they're doing, it might be a quenching.

When they come in together, essentially it's like, oh, they're hitting a critical point. Now, that critical point could be the collapse of space-time. That critical point could be It's some sort of phase transition. The superconducting temperature is also a phase transition. The superconducting temperature, everything above this is not superconducting, the thing falls apart. Everything below this temperature, it's super conducting.

It the orb works as normal. This is called a phase transition. You transition between those phases, you have phase transition. When the orb disappears, it's also described as a phase transition. The question is what's transiting? What's the transition? >> The 20 There's a 2015 Tian explosion happened on the uh um the waterfront of Tianjin, China.

And it's watch the whole thing. I mean, it just goes on and on. Uh finally, there's just an enormous explosion that rocks the entire city. Uh killed hundreds of hundreds of people, destroyed thousands of buildings. Uh it's very dangerous. Uh this device would be very dangerous to play with.

You'd probably want to bury it so that you uh can store energy underground. Uh and then you could do these experiments safely. Uh there may be a way to enhance this using uh SGI again. This may be another application where Hey, maybe we haven't thought of everything here. This is the best that humans can do, but maybe SGI designed to be more efficient than this. And would not need to scale.

For instance, uh Jack Sarfatti and company have talked about if you if you load the middle of this device with higher permeability, permittivity, index higher index materials that you may get a magnification of the field. You may get a magnification of the effect, and you wouldn't need as much current. You could >> This is Jack He's giving Jack Sarfatti the credit. Bro, I read your scientific paper that you referenced this. I read Gary Stevenson's scientific paper. I've done four different live streams mentioning the high permittivity material that you put in the middle or you can coat the ring of it.

And the idea is that that high permittivity material, just as he says here, will act like a lens. The energy that flows through that lens will better couple to space-time, better couple to gravity. That's the idea. And when I looked up these high permittivity materials, what what is what What are we talking about? Guy in the chat was asking for proof. Okay, what material?

YBCO. The ceramic superconductors that Ning Li was working on, that's the material, the high permittivity material you're going to put in the middle of this? Yep. What are the odds that the lady that said she was doing anti-gravity had the exact material that they are now theoretically saying should better couple to make anti-gravity work? And Ning Li specifically said she was making a superconducting lens. This is why I say, chat, sometimes I think I'm the only conscious human being and that this is some kind of Truman Show game cuz why is all the people not figuring this out? What's the deal here?

Why is Gary Stevenson not talking about this? >> You could do the same field effects with less current. Uh and I put some of the backup material in the backup material, some Jack Sarfatti equations that seem to indicate a missing factor in Einstein's field equations that if you if Einstein's field equations are great in a near vacuum but if they go through matter, there may be impacts uh to the field equations that are not accounted for in the current math.

Uh and so he has done a good job of of going over that and that may be one of those things that SGI can improve on you know, in terms of speeding up uh human advancements. >> Hm. >> Okay, let's go a little further out where there become more questions than answers. Let's go to warp drives that are your classic warp drives, the Alcubierre warp drive. There's another warp drive >> Alcubierre? That's that's got to be my favorite pronunciation. Somehow nobody can say Alcubierre. Apparently you can't.

People really struggle with this. Which is funny cuz I'm terrible at names. You guys know how bad I am at names. If you watch these live streams, you've seen me butcher every single name that's out there. And yet I can get Alcubierre's name right. And the people are out here all berries, Alcuberrys?

Alcuberry Finn, chat? We're going to take that Alcuberry Finn warp drive down the river. About to do it. Let me hear him say it one more time. I want to hear Gary Stevenson absolutely butcher this name one more time. That was amazing. >> warp drives that are There we go. further out where there become more questions than answers.

Let's go to warp drives that are your classic warp drives that's like Alcubierre warp drive. >> The Alcubierre the Alcubierre Finn warp drive chat. This is this is got to be Tim Burchett's favorite dag nabbit warp drive. The Alcubierre Finn warp drive dag nabbit. That's how the aliens be flying around. In their particle accelerators dag nabbit. Chat can can Tim Tim Burchett please do the alien disclosure?

I nominate Tim Burchett for all technology and alien disclosures. It's just foxy. It's foxy and it it just feels right when he says it. He's got to say Alcubierre Finn warp drive though like that. >> That's uh that has acceleration that permits acceleration Alcubierre warp drive actually isn't valid in an accelerated environment. Uh the Tory warp drive is and so there's been a lot of work recently and there's even web pages where people post their warp drive designs. There are warp drive tools now where you can download them and play with the general relativity equations.

Uh and so there's a lot of advances uh in at least theoretical advances in these warp drive designs. >> Now, somebody else I have to bring up to you guys because I'm starting to push the envelope so far I'm not even going to get credit for a lot of this. Nobody was connecting warp drives and wormholes. Okay? Nobody was connecting warp drives and wormholes literally nobody. Except for me. Because I was saying it's all the same physics.

A warp drive and a wormhole same physics same as the EM drive. You're just taking your dial on your gravity beam and you're turning it up. You turn it up enough and you get a wormhole. Much like breaking the speed the speed barrier the sound barrier. You break the sound barrier and suddenly you have a delay when when you hear the sound. Same with light.

Break the light barrier and you teleport. Some actually pretty simple, guys. I know it's really complicated now, sounds really fake and science fiction, but when you get a little older, a little wiser, you're going to realize this is all true. >> Going back to Dr. White and some of this his work is in the backup material. He has looked at the impact of using negative index materials. Is that a key to to doing some of this warp drive engineering? If we're able to make negative index materials, does that help us with these warp drive solutions?

Another issue is uh whether or not this technology is UAP adjacent. What do I mean by that? UAPs are uh unidentified anomalous phenomena. >> So, one thing that where I think if I'm going to look, I kind of been jerking myself off a lot on these live streams. Let's criticize a little bit. Criticism. We have not yet completely destroyed the acronym of UAPs. People are still saying it and they don't have shame in their voice when they say it.

So, therefore, we have not adequately harassed these people enough. I can't stand the acronym UAP. I never say it unless I'm making fun of somebody for saying it. We need to get back to UFOs. UAPs is quite literally the woke DEI version of UFOs. And I just absolutely hate it and I won't stand for it.

So, we need to go back to mocking people talking about UAPs. UFOs are cool. UAPs is like a child trans surgery. It's gross. No one wants to know about that. No one wants to hear it.

Let's just go back to being normal. Can we do that? Talking about UFOs, it was already fine. Unidentified flying object, very vague, describes anything. >> Potentially non-human intelligence origin. So, UAP adjacent technology would be something that we could potentially derive from UAP technologies. And if there's if this is something that they're using in a UAP, might we be able to uh reverse engineer it and use it uh in in human engineered craft? >> Yes. >> So, that that is an open question.

That's a matter of great debate in >> Answer, yes. >> scientific community, especially >> I mean, is it I kind of like everybody just kind of going like we don't really talk about this, but UFOs are using warp drives. UFOs are using wormholes. UFOs are using gravity for making impulse drive. Like, are we all just we're cool with this, right? Like, nobody's really declared this is the case, but we're just kind of saying it as if it's just public knowledge. Like, it is it is known that UFOs are using warp drives.

I mean, they obviously have to be. There is no other possibility. >> And the the scientific coalition for UAP studies, which I volunteer for, and I did a paper for them where I went through uh a couple years ago, I went through all the different potential warp drive designs, and I did a taxonomy of these warp drive uh designs uh so that we could do a categorization. And that got enough interest that I was invited to present to AIAA at a special session at Naval Postgraduate School next year in 2027. So, maybe Tim, when I finish with that >> Wait. What? Wait.

He's got a presentation for Naval War Grad School that he's doing for this on this? >> A presentation for Naval Postgraduate School. I'll come back in later 2027 and we'll have this talk again. >> Dude, who is Gary Stevenson? How do you get invited to do a warp drive talk to the Naval War Postgraduate School or whatever the heck he just said? How How do you even get invited to that? Even Neil deGrasse Tyson, they would never even consider inviting him to that. That's a What a What a flex, chat.

Is he just aura farming on us right here? I think he's just aura farming on us right now. Why did he even mention that? It's like, "Oh, yeah. Hey, by the way, I was invited to do Naval War presentation on warp drives to a bunch of Navy war graduates. Hmm, that's weird.

That doesn't seem normal. >> Another interesting thing about warp drive technology is >> This guy This guy is giving Naval War graduates warp drive presentations and he built our nuclear communication like ultimate like uh Cold War nuclear winter airplane communications. That's just what we know about him publicly. These people definitely into that alien technology. And also you notice that they talk about oh, it's UAP adjacent technology. You don't see Gary Stevenson going crazy talking about the little green men invading and controlling America. Right?

Why? Cuz he knows that's not what's happening. He knows it's just people. He knows it's just humans that have access to super advanced technology. >> is that you could potentially enable gravitational beam technology. Visser and company did a fascinating paper on >> gravity >> 2021. Santiago Schuster Visser, the tractor beams, presser beams, and stressor beams. You can use plane old general relativity to come up with these solutions.

They're essentially well placing a warp drive so that >> So this is what's cool. You can use You can come up with a gravity beam with the just regular general relativity. Well, I explained it to you earlier. We actually don't even need to invoke zero-point energy to explain how a gravity beam can work. I just told you what to do. We just need a free electron laser.

We need a wiggler to get everything in phase and then we put a huge bunch of energy and then we take it away and now we have a gravity beam. That actually doesn't require invoking zero-point energy at all other than the fact that zero-point energy is the basis of everything. >> Tractor beam, you're you're having a little dip in gravitation uh right in front of the object here. They picture a cow. And you're dragging that cow forward to your spacecraft or to the goal with with this moving well, gravitational well. You're moving the gravitational well.

You can also have a presser beam where you're taking a gravitational hill and you're pushing it against uh an object or a stressor >> So, you can do either a presser you can make any kind of beam you need. You can make a beam that pulls towards you because what you're doing is you're making a dip in space-time and things naturally move towards the dip. That's what's really happening. That's what gravity really is. You think gravity is something that's pulling you down, that's not what's happening. Gravity is actually bending the flat space-time and making it so instead of going straight, you walk crooked.

That's all gravity is doing. If there's a whole bunch of gravity over here, then I'm going to I'm going to go this way. If there's gravity over here, I'm going to go this way. Gravity's not pulling you, it's just changing your path. You're always going forward. And if that blows your mind, then you're I'm glad you're here cuz you're about to learn a lot about gravity. >> presser beam where you want to push something open, you can have a stressor beam.

You can have a push on one end of the poor thing and a pull on the other side. You can do a little tear on it and it's potentially um you know, a way of describing cattle mutilations, right? If these gravitational beams are really in use. So, that I thought was an interesting academic exercise that Vischer and company went through just like four or five years ago. Finally, wormhole creation would also spring out of this uh technology. There's a couple aspects to wormhole creation.

One is a plain old physical wormhole that you could potentially travel through. That's also called an Einstein-Rosen Bridge, ER Bridge. However, there's there's other questions >> even see this. It says ER equals EPR right at the bottom of the screen right there. Right there. I just read this now for the first time.

Related the ER equals EPR conjecture. This whole presentation is basically all the science that I've been reviewing over the last 3 years. I'm actually trying to think of what he missed cuz he seems to have hit like everything. He's even got ER equals EPR on here. >> Uh one being, can you have a traversable wormhole that only connects information? In other words, can you pass information over or through quantum entangled particles? to quantum entangled particles qualify as a traversable information bridge. Uh I'm entanglement here being Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen, EPR uh EPR bridge.

So, the conjecture here is is an Einstein-Rosen bridge equivalent to an Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen bridge? >> This is so crazy, dude. This is so crazy to watch. Somebody who's definitely a black project engineer just copying everything I've been saying. And I don't mean I mean that in the best possible light cuz he knew this before I knew this. No doubt about that. But it's crazy to watch somebody highlighting everything that you've been saying.

Now all the people that say, "Oh, this is gobbledygook. Ash is just He's just mixing big words together." Is Gary Stevenson mixing big words together? He's a PhD. He's a defense contract. He's doing speeches to the war colleges. >> Is uh a wormhole in space-time can it be created by entanglement? >> So, doesn't it make sense if we have entanglement and we actually they were actually sending There's many experiments that have been claiming to send full messages, to actually receive messages on their side, and they keep getting debunked cuz people keep saying it's not possible.

It's not theoretically possible. But people just keep experimenting and saying that the results are showing it's happening. That the state of the of the particle over here has been passed over here. That's information transfer. Faster than the speed of light. I don't know how people People are honestly we're at the point now where it's like the COVID boosters are giving people heart attacks and people are just denying it.

Right? That's the point we're at right now when it comes to quantum tunnel entanglement. Of course that's a wormhole. It's literally the same thing that a wormhole is doing. How did we not even put this together earlier is the bigger question I have. It's like why didn't we just realize that oh, the thing that we think of as quantum entanglement that's just a wormhole because wormholes aren't Deep Space Nine big holes that open up that you go flying through.

We just conceptually misunderstood wormholes. That's all. >> Or vice versa, can a small amount of entanglement create at least an information wormhole? This is an open question and it's hotly debated right now in science. Uh I think I think there's been some really good papers on it. Uh and so I think if you uh type in ER equals EPR >> See, this is what he's I think this is exactly what he's talking about how it's hotly debated. And when you say hotly debated, what they really mean is like we have experiments showing it's happening and people are just denying that it's real.

That's pretty much where we're at when we talk about hotly debated. >> into like YouTube, you'll see some pretty famous physicists uh debating debating this topic. So I I won't go any more detail than that, but this is certainly an area of hot research and I expect this could wind up being uh one of these technologies that we start seeing in the 2050 frame, you know, a quarter century out there. We'll see. >> 2050. We have to wait 25 years for this? You're going to make me wait 25 years for some [ __ ] that they had at least 10 years ago today?

This I mean, whoever said that they're 50 or 100 years ahead, you are they are not wrong. They are not wrong, Chad. They are not planning on rolling out the orbs or the teleportation for another 100 years, man. How crazy is that? What kind of That That means it has to be a plan, right? For something to be on that long of a time scale, there has to be a a literal government plan that's being enacted beyond any individual. >> Uh what's left?

What's left is quantum cosmology. I wanted to just touch on this a little bit because I just got through uh the Claus Kiefer book, uh the fourth edition. I guess the first three were red hot messes, but you got your stuff together with the fourth edition. So those are interested in the topic of quantum gravity, I can highly recommend uh Claus Kiefer's book quantum This is called quantum gravity. Uh and if you >> Let me be real with you guys. Um I'm kind of embarrassed to say I don't know what the [ __ ] quantum gravity means.

I actually just don't know what quantum gravity means. In my mind, quantum gravity means like how somebody unifies it's just a unification. How to mix quantum physics with general relativity. And I think people use it in many different contexts, but it all basically just means that. If it's something actually more specific than that, then I don't understand it. >> Through that you will be well-schooled in the topic and you'll be ready to take on quantum cosmology uh in in a in a great way. There's some interesting things coming out of quantum gravity.

For instance, uh time itself starts disappearing and the T just starts going away in a lot of these equations, which is disturbing if you like live in time like I do. Uh time might be emergent. And so uh the descriptions right now in quantum gravity uh don't capture that emergent nature of the state change. For one thing um either the big bang or the big bounce, depending on how you look at it. Does Does the universe come to a singularity and do we spring out of a singularity?

Or is there some minimum size when we're crushing the universe down that it gets to a minimum size and then it gets back out of that minimum size like >> I got a better idea. Universe is infinite. Next. >> Like couple Planck lengths, something like that. That's called the big crunch. Uh and so that's something that might be uh emerging from quantum cosmology. They call it Yeah.

Like pyrotic uh pyrotic quantum to cosmology. >> Okay, you need a new name, bro. If your name is epyrotic, you got to just come up with something better. Just call it Bob. Bob cosmology, okay? I don't know why people need a lot of help. Like I should just do marketing for people.

Like I'll just we'll just come up with smart names to call things where I won't use UAP. We'll go back to calling free energy. Uh aneutronic fusion is just one of the coolest names ever. Who came up Who came up with aneutronic fusion? All they had to do is add an A in front of it. Just use basic linguis- linguistic uh capabilities.

Perfect. See, simple is better. Don't try to make it sound crazy and cool. Just A neutronic fusion already sounds cool as hell. Already or or a farming right out of the gate. >> Where you're getting this oscillation or this bounce between two different membranes or two different quantum states and it it looks like the universe compressing and expanding. So that's that's an open question.

The other open question is are there ways that we can prove that gravity is quantum mechanical in nature? And the answer seems to be yes. I attended Slack Summer Institute in this this summer. That's something where senior grad students that are ready to graduate in physics and post docs sign up for the summer institute and they elicit talks in this particular case. >> Is that David Maker he's got referenced here? He has a David Maker reference right there. Go back guys.

Find the Tom Montauk interviews that I did a couple years ago and he talks about David Maker and I think he has a quantum gravity or unification theory that's very similar and in a line with everything we've been talking about. >> So it was quantum sensing for a quantum world. And some of the talks were on can we use quantum detecting for dark matter? But many of the talks were also could can we use quantum sensing for gravitational effects?

And so this Mask QC collaboration which is pictured in the upper right this is a group of academics that have band together to try to prove that gravity is quantum mechanical. So they're looking for quantum entanglement quantum mechanic >> That this is not Bob Baker. This is David Maker not Bob Baker David Maker. Two different people but yeah. David Maker. >> effects between different objects due to their due to purely to their gravity due to their self gravitation because they have mass. So I look forward to seeing the results from them on this.

I'll close also with um the idea of a computational universe. You know, is the is the universe really fundamentally if we're talking about >> Okay, so this so this the reason why we watched the end is this. Okay, so we get a bunch of tidbits where Gary Stevenson's basically affirming every technology that I've been reviewing over the last 2 years. And then, what's the bigger picture? If you want to know the alien question, this is basically Gary Stevenson's version of the alien question. Which is, what's the nature of the universe?

Do we live in a simulation? Well, we're about to find out. Here we go. Let's see what Gary Stevenson says. >> about everything being a quantum states and quantum state changes are real and time is purely emergent from them. Do we have just state operators and state changes? Is that really what's fundamental to the universe?

Which means really we're just doing computations. We have a quantum computational universe. Uh, and the particles and the time and the space all emerge from that, but they're not fundamental. The quantum computations are fundamental. Uh, this is one of the one of the proponents of this is a physicist by the name of David Maker. Uh, pretty fascinating uh, study where he like derives from first principles most of the of the uh, laws of physics and most of the particle masses.

And then he makes some predictions about a fractal universe, that we're living in a in evolving fractal universe, that we're in a big fractal. And so I at one point in my life like around 2014 I I thought I might sort of understand this. So I did some drawings. I did them picturing picturing these concepts with jellyfish because jellyfish are these flexible great creatures that can be any shape. Uh, and so I did a series of six drawings and that's a whole another talk. But uh, I find >> Pretty interesting.

So he is saying yes. We live in a computational universe and all there is is the interactions. This is exactly what Charles Chase told me. This is exactly what Charles Chase told me. He said, "All there is is the interactions. Time, even space.

Everything we see only exists because there's these quantum interactions that are happening. That means everything is just information. That's why he's saying, "Perhaps our universe is just information processing." That's it. What we see is all an illusion from these quantum effects. And this is supported by the idea of the Aharonov-Bohm effect.

What we see in the Aharonov-Bohm effect is even if we have no electromagnetic fields, we still see a shift in the path of phase of the uh electrons. That means that the potentials are what's causing the real effects. The invisible thing is the real thing. The thing that we see as physical is not the real underlying mechanics. Now, that's really messes with your head. Ultimately, it doesn't change anything about our reality.

My hand still can't go through this microphone. Doesn't make this world any less real. But, it does mean that our universe is a lot more magical than we've been perceiving it to be. We really do have some Harry Potter magic going on in this universe. And fractal. Yes, Bob Green here, if you haven't checked him out.

The big secret to unification is that the universe is scale invariant. You also hear this word fractal. A fractal pattern is one that has the same pattern no matter the size. You can make your your pattern as big like a snail shell, right? It rotates around and it just gets bigger and bigger, but the pattern stays the same. That's the idea of scale invariance, and that's what most physicists who have intelligent unification theories, that's their view is that there is not different physics at the small scale and the large scale.

The physics is the same. But, if that's the case, then that means time is an illusion on the large scale. Because we don't even need time on the quantum mechanics scale. So, that means what we see as the passage of time must be an illusion. Uh that's the only way we can reconcile these. Every belief, every in discongruity between the two theories must be reconciled. >> And David made his work quite fascinating, and so I I spent a year just drawing some of his ideas out.

And the the lower right is is one of those drawings of us living in a factory universe. I'm going to close with that. That's a pretty wacky idea. >> Wacky idea? Hell no, that's awesome. That's an awesome idea. And Gary Stevenson, shout out to you.

And shout out to Tim Ventura. We're currently planning to do a follow-up, but as you see with all the stuff I've got going on, might be a few weeks. But, currently planning to do a follow with Tim Ventura because I feel like he's the perfect foil to my my felony physics. He has all the background information about these guys, talked to them all, communicates with them, apparently doing inside podcasts or, you know, presentations about our content. Gary Stevenson, number one. Let's go to those super chats, guys.

Thank you for hanging out tonight. MH370 is back. Methyl, thank you everybody in the pill chat. Mr. Joe Man, hi friends. Hope you guys are doing well in my pill chat tonight. Rumble chat popping off tonight. Double L's, Wild Lurker, K Sierra.

Uh, who else we got there? Out of uh, The Cave New York. Nice to see you, brother. SMASH Bros, Not Yoda. How you guys doing? Hope you guys are doing great in the Rumble chat tonight.

And then I saw the chat super chats were going wild up here. Chaotic good, I hope you're doing well. Hope your son's doing well as well. Mission integrity. Thank you very much for that super chat, appreciate you. Dobby with a throbbing.

Best YouTube username on the internet. Call him Crashton Forbes the way his streams go down. Chat, I said Crashton Forbes wasn't going to stick. And then they crashed my computer. And now it's literally true. Now it's not figurative anymore.

Now it's just quite literal. In fact, between that and the the camera randomly going off, this I got to do some uh, I got to sweep I got to sweep the apartment for bugs, chat. I got to sweep for bugs. We've been getting a little too loosey-goosey with our uh, our operational security here. Uh, I have a feeling that we probably got the CIA, China, even Russia, they probably all got Trojans in the back of my computer now at this point. 1013 fly says, "Money towards a router upgrade."

Chat, where do you think you live? You get to pick your What reality do you guys get live in that you get to pick what your router? The way it works in America is you go with whatever internet service there is and they send you the router and that's what you get. And usually it's a piece of [ __ ] I mean, every single time. That's how internet works in America. Just nobody seems to care and we just live this way.

Honestly, we're like Bananas backwards savages when it comes to internet in this place. And honestly, the one that I got was better than the last one. And the worst part about this is my router is plugged into the phone line like it's 1992. I honestly wonder if like is it going to is it going to knock out my phone service when the when I'm using the internet? Like that's how primitive we're at here, chat. And my building is not even old.

Anyway, what I'm saying is we need the warp drives, we need the ethernet, which is what we're going to call the new quantum internet. Told you I'm good at marketing. We need the warp drives and we need the fusion reactors ASAP. And let's upgrade that internet. Upgrade those routers. Little quantum router.

Sound nice, yeah? Stewart McCloud toaster fund the plus 10. Look at this. I just used crash my computer intentionally. I'm going to get a new free upgraded computer from all these super chats tonight. It's amazing.

Chat, who may Maybe I did do it. Maybe I'm a mastermind. Maybe I crashed my own computer. You don't know. BC War X, thank you for that super says, "Dance refund." Do the strip clubs over there require the head wrapping? [laughter] Answer only if you want to.

Guys, I will not lie to you. Strip clubs have never been my thing. I hate going to strip clubs. I got traumatized. Guys, true story. I went to London right out of college when I was graduating and my buddy missed his flight, so I was stuck there for a day.

So, I stayed in this random shitty shitty hostel and this Indian dude rolls up and he's obsessed with me and he wants to take me to the strip clubs. To the degree where after I turned him down for the eighth time, I said, "Okay, fine. Fine, let's go." And it was the weirdest [ __ ] ever. He was asking me way too many personal questions, what my favorite sex position is and I'm like, "Dude, this is not appropriate for like I just met you." And then we go to the strip club and there's like only it's like a weekday.

There's like three people in the strip club and like 50 girls that all just want to like, "Okay, I want to do a lap dance with you. I want to do a lap dance with you." But they all have to have this like weird conversation. Wait, what's your name? Where are you from? Dude, if I enjoyed strip clubs, I would have a no talking rule.

There'd be a no talking rule. Don't talk to me. I don't I'm not here to have a conversation with you. No. I'm just here to observe the situation. So, anyway, a guy creeped me out. Thought he was going to rape me. I was pretty sure that was going to be the end that night and I will never I just don't ever want to go back to a strip club.

Honestly. There you go. Now you know a little bit more about me, chat. That was for my parasol para social followers out there. Sonia Sullivan, $50 super chat. But damn, I'm going to get a lot of lap dances with that.

Maybe like one lap dance. Aneutronic fusion. DT deuterium helium 3. FRC fusion propulsion air breathing MHD Lorentz lift and thrust and now it's all being discussed openly. A lot of us get it, Ashton. If Candace is the principal, then you are the professor.

Keep on teaching on. Thank you very much, Sonia Sullivan. I appreciate you. That's a huge super chat, very nice, too. And I think you hit it right on the head. All the concepts that I've been talking about.

People have been saying, "Oh, this is word salad. You're just making stuff up." Now you got a legit engineer confirming it. That's how he sees it, the future. And the follow-up chat, wow, in a follow-up. High-frequency gravitational wave communication study 20 years ago.

Now the Pentagon wants bases self-sufficient for 90 days. I heard that. The Pentagon saying that our bases need to be able to be self-sufficient for at least 90 days. Why? Because we're going to get hit with some directed energy weapons, zero-point energy, black hole weapons, and it's going to be GG's for entire cities. Robert Forward, Earth's rotating mass causes frame dragging.

So, how far did they take the engineering? Sonia Sullivan, gold star for you. Now I'm a little more white-pilled. There's at least one other human being that can think for themselves on this planet. Makes me feel good. E credit fund, NASA wireless transmission of power demonstration.

Yeah, the whole thing about wireless power transmission, too, is like people just that's not possible, but then they like keep demonstrating it. Demonstrating directed energy beams over distances beyond what should be conventionally possible. And people say, "Oh, well, they're just doing impedance matching." Okay. Okay. S Fleischer, thank you Steven Fleischer says, "Man, I wish we had a channel membership."

I thought we had channel memberships. Do I have an I thought I I didn't set up the channel memberships? Oh, maybe we have to do that. Guys, help me convince Ashton to turn on channel memberships. I'll give 50 memberships right now. I'll get it set up for you guys on Wednesday.

I actually thought it was already set up. I just thought that nobody was doing it. I I went through the whole motions to set it up. I only set up the one for the $5 plan. Maybe I have to hit publish or something. That'll be funny cuz I did that like over a year ago.

I think somebody should probably have told me. Oh, well. Sonia Sullivan, quantum mechanics tells us how matter and energy behave at the smallest scales. General relativity tells us how matter and energy shapes space-time. So, quantum gravity asks, "When or asks what happens when space-time itself has to obey quantum rules?" Exactly.

And I think what we'll find is the same high-energy physics in the large scales is the same thing we see on the small scales or very similar. Thank you for all those super chats. Marky Pie, where is the orb factory? So many sites. Well, how about we go check out White Sands? White Sands sounds like a pretty cool place we should check out since they were building free electron lasers.

Grush Deva Grush Dev auction house, that's how I read that. Too much World of Warcraft. Check out Nassim Haramein's paper, The Origin of Mass and the Nature of Gravity. Fractal holographic universe is the way. I'm surprised Nassim Haramein has avoided me so much. I feel like he could have got a lot of clout by just jumping on the train.

But, I feel like he's trying to appeal to a more conventional kind of libtarded uh audience, one that uh cares about credibility, right? Versus me where I'm like, "No, here it is. I don't care. I don't care what you think about me. I don't care if you hate me. Here's the truth.

Take it or leave it." So, but yeah, Nassim Haramein is absolutely correct and he even I think can derive the radius of the proton. And why is that important? We say, "Well, how can you What does it matter if you can derive the radius of the proton?" Cuz what he's saying is that uh each proton is basically a black hole, it's just scaled down. He's saying the universe is scale invariant.

That's what he's saying when he's talking about the radius of the proton and all this other stuff. He's like, "Oh, if you do the math, it's like basically just like a black hole but on a tiny little scale or like a galaxy on a tiny little scale or like a solar system on a tiny little scale." Yep. Timothy Foster, and I just want to say thank you to Timothy Foster for all the super chats or the donations that I see in the live stream comments. Timothy Foster has to be the number one donator in the comments, for sure.

Thank you very much for all the super chats, sir. Appreciate you. And I appreciate all the hardcore followers as well as everybody else. Even if you haven't been donating, I still appreciate you. Okay, guys. We'll be back on Wednesday.

I don't know exactly what we're going to cover on Wednesday, but we're probably going to dig into some MH370 in the next few live streams, go over some of the evidence cuz I want to get it fresh in my mind and I want to map out the key the most important pieces of data. The The biggest things that we would want to support, including stuff I mentioned today, which is the uh radar, missing radar data, uh probably the the surveillance systems themselves. What the surveillance systems are? Can you imagine if we can get corroboration on the Litening camera?

I mean, I'm saying that one of those videos is Gorgon Stare and the other one is a Litening G4. Those are very specific cameras. Presumably, people have used those cameras. They would recognize that even if it's not the exact camera, they would should recognize the same brand of camera. They're going to have the same software systems. So, all I'm saying, guys, is hopes are sky high, but let's keep it tempered. Let's not get too excited and let's just let things play out the way they are.

We've been doing very well and we just have to keep keep on marching. Anyway, thank you guys very much. Have a great night. Love you all. Peace out. MH370X.

Later. >> [music] >> Out in the fields [music] where the skies are wide, talking about a journey through the cosmic ride. Einstein and Thorne, they set the stage for a trip through time across the space age. Wormholes connect distant points in space, traversable paths to to far-off place. No black [music] holes pull, no crushing weight, just a cosmic tunnel to a distant gate. >> Talking wormholes, stargates, negative [music] energy. Travel through the cosmos, it's our destiny. MH370, [music] where did it go?

Boeing 777 through a wormhole flow. We're talking wormholes, stargates, negative [music] energy. Travel through the cosmos, it's our destiny. MH370, [music] where did it go? Boeing 777 through a wormhole flow. >> [music] [music] >> Exotic matter, [music] negative energy's the key to stabilize the wormhole for you and me. Quantum vacuum, squeeze so tight, creating conditions for this wondrous flight. [music] >> Magnetic fields and lasers in the lab they play, generating forces in a new kind [music] of way.

Gravitational squeezing, Casimir force, negative zones we need to stay the course. Talking wormholes, stargates, negative [music] energy. Travel through the cosmos, it's our destiny. MH370, where [music] did it go? Boeing 777 through a wormhole flow. >> Thin shell [music] formalism plays so fine. Spherical geometry we realize.

Energy conditions [music] that we must define. For stable wormhole, let's give it a try. >> [music] [music] >> Quantum forces balancing the plates, creating the throat, opening gates from Earth to the stars in a single bound. A shortcut through space profound. Engineers [music] and dreamers hold the key to future worlds and what we could be. With science in hand, we forge ahead through the cosmic paths that we now tread. With our wormholes, [music] stargates, negative energy, travel through the cosmos and start destiny.

If they had 370, [music] where did it go? Boeing 777 through a wormhole flow. From the fields [music] to the stars, we break the chains. Understanding the universe, we make the gains. Lil Hurk shines, bringing truth to light. Through this music, we'll explore the [music] night.

With wormholes and stargates, our path is clear. Exploring the cosmos, our future's here.