Video Transcript
Okay. The main event. Are you ready? I don't know how I didn't see this a month ago. There's even a comment about can't wait to watch this on Ashton's stream. Found another presentation by Gary Stevenson. Gary Stevenson on Tim Ventura, once again. Guys, where did we rank? Where did we rank Gary Stevenson on the black project tier list? Whatever it was, probably too low. Probably too low. Probably needs to be upgraded one more rank or two. But now this is the part where on the reverse side I'm like, you know what? Let's not get Gary Stevenson killed. He's a nice guy. He's like one of my favorite physicists and engineers out there right now. Is he into some black project stuff? Undoubtedly. Undoubtedly, chat. There's no way you can do a presentation like this here that he's about to show without being dabbling in a little questionably ethical science and physics. But at the same time, oh my goodness, what a resource for knowledge. I could listen to this dude talk all day long, chat. Honestly, he might even get the pass. Even if he voted for Hillary Clinton, chat. Even if he has TDS. I don't know. I don't know. Maybe he does. Maybe he doesn't. Might have to let this one slide. Okay. We're just going to get into this. I'm excited. For a lot of people, chat. >> So what a minor >> They They watch porn. They watch porn. They watch tentacle porn and and bestiality and other degenerate [ __ ] chat. For me, my degenerate [ __ ] is watching Gary Stevenson explain how to produce gravitational waves and photons. Forbidden physics, chat. [ __ ] that they ban. You can only get that on the dark web. You don't get this You don't get this kind of stuff on the normal web. You get it filtered out, chat. You get all the the the sketchy degenerate physics filtered out from you. So, here we go. Get your lube ready, chat. >> [clears throat] >> Remember, anywhere, anytime. By the way, why does he have three lightning bolts, chat? But, what's going on here? What's Are we serious right now? I feel like they're just trolling me directly. Three lightning bolts? Come on. I'm not trying to go too schizo here, but jeez, man. >> and the follow-on at Puthoff shop in Austin. So, he actually had a bulk device in mind and so >> Whoa, what did you just say there? Fact. >> but is a new way to get it. Yes, it is. And I can't take credit for the original idea. This came from Giorgio Fontana, who you met during these state conferences that you mentioned. He was also at the working groups for hyper gravity working groups, the one at MITRE and the follow-on at Puthoff shop. >> I'm sorry. [clears throat] Sorry. Um, did he just say Puthoff's shop? You said it really fast, Gary. You said it kind of fast, but I think I heard Puthoff's shop in Austin. I did I did hear it. I'm 100% sure. Guys, all roads lead back to Hal Puthoff, okay? Just You know what? Put my Pulitzer Prize Put my Pulitzer Prize in the mail. Let my nephew rip it up on the stream. He'll do it in my honor after they take me out. You know it's going to happen. Puthoff's going to send his goons, chat. Um, Giorgio Fontana deserves the original work the original credit for the idea of converting a photon into a graviton using this mechanism. These mechanisms originate with Giorgio Fontana. He met with Hal Puthoff. He went to the MITRE conference and to Hal Puthoff's shop in Austin, Texas. >> It's, uh, Austin. So, uh, he actually had a bulk device in mind. So, what I've done here was it would have been very difficult to build a device he he imagined. So, what I've done instead is redesigned it so it can be uh prepared in a thin film manner, uh, on a silicon wafer as if it was a a transistor array. >> I can't tell you how excited I am for this. He's like, "Hey, he was going to try to do this idea, but it didn't work. And so, I turned it into this thin film, and then we also turned it into an array." Why'd we turn it into an array? Uh, any guesses? Any guesses out there? Oh, because it amplifies the power significantly of it. So, basically like we fixed this [ __ ] It was janky. It wasn't working. Now we got better material science. Now we're going to make this [ __ ] a reality. And Gary Stevenson is apparently all in on this. Because how many presentations have we watched? Like three, four? I mean, Tim Ventura has him on speed dial, apparently. My goodness. Okay. Continue, good sir. >> Okay. So, let me get into some of the foundational aspects of this because HFGWs are kind of a niche topic. It's one of those things that some very serious, very rigorous physicists have explored. I think it really got kicked off by the work of Dr. Robert Forward and then Dr. Robert Baker, um, he did a tremendous amount on this. >> Robert Baker wrote one of the derds, chat. I'm going to keep calling you chat. Robert M. L. Baker, Bob Baker, is Gary Stevenson's mentor. Just tell me. Just tell me which Jason number are you, dude? Which Jason? Did they give you a number? Are you number like 420, number 67 69 I don't know, I'm just I'm just guessing. Mhm. [clears throat] >> for decades. So, some pivotal figures were involved with this. You have been involved with this for decades and you have done remarkable top-tier scientific work in this area as well. >> Yeah, I I give credit to Bob Baker. He was my mentor in this area. >> Yeah. >> Bob Baker was my mentor in this area. I give credit to Bob Baker. >> [clears throat] >> I'm going to regret saying this. Congress should probably talk to this guy. Congress if you are Congressman Burlison and you're trying to figure out where the UFOs are hiding well, Hal Puthoff told you the authors of the DIRDS are the black project engineers. So, you want to know who you should go talk to? You probably should go talk to the authors of those scientific papers that are classified or were classified including this guy's mentor. Now, unfortunately, a lot of them are dead now. So, hmm. Wonder who else we could talk to. Hmm. I wonder if there's anybody out there explaining how we can [ __ ] turn photons into gravitons. Hmm. Can't find anybody. Nobody anywhere. >> It is It is I mean, there is incredible legacy. It is within relativity theory. It is supported to the best of my knowledge by mainstream physics, right? >> It is, although the the device we'll be discussing today is more supported by quantum mechanics. But, the the original work that Bob did was entirely within the realm of general relativity. >> So, high-frequency gravitational waves again just as kind of a foundational catch-up for folks who might not be familiar or it's been a while. Um these might be comparable to what LIGO is looking for, uh except that LIGO is looking for low frequency gravitational waves, if I remember correctly. It's looking for stuff that's >> like like the sensitivity is uh between 20 Hz and just like that 4,000 Hz now. They're going all the way up to 4,000 Hz. The signals we're talking about are in the GHz microwave range. >> Just immediately destroys the LIGO argument. Very first point. LIGO We're going to go with the LIGO LIGO. LIGO, Tim Ventura, I'll help you out. LIGO, the reason why LIGO isn't seeing the alien warp drives, cuz if this is true, if we can make gravitons, then the aliens must have warp drives. Why aren't we seeing them with our LIGO experiment? Which is our gravitational wave detector. And the answer is cuz it's only detecting low frequency gravitational waves from celestial bodies. From neutron stars colliding. It's not searching for the right kind of gravitational waves, from the high frequency gravitational waves that would be produced by aliens. Aliens, chat. When I say aliens, by the way, I use this all encompassing. Sometimes I'm talking about illegal aliens. Sometimes I'm talking about ET. Sometimes I'm talking about cosmic sentience creatures and plasma creatures, whatever exists. I don't give a [ __ ] Sometimes I'm talking about jellyfish creatures, too. Anyway, continue. >> Uh if you were to look at the RF equivalent spectrum versus what I would call very low frequency RF. If if you're talking RF range, 20 Hz to 4,000 Hz is extremely low frequency, um which is where, you know, E6 operates for instance in the RF. >> So, he just said a bunch of technical [ __ ] chat, and I don't even know. I can just tell you he's an expert. I can tell you this is should be in this dude should be in charge of the UFO UAP learning group. Chat, there he is. Thousand times more qualified than Avi Loeb. Just said some [ __ ] about radars nobody understands and frequencies, but basically admitted just said the LIGO is low frequency. That's why we're not seeing the warp drives. The moment we turn the LIGO up and we create a high frequency gravitational wave detector, the sky is going to light up with aliens teleporting around. We're going to be like, "Oh, there's another warp drive over there." Space Force probably already has this. Certain searching for all the aliens coming to try and invade us. Turns out it doesn't seem like it happens very often. >> So, the reason people should be excited about this is once you get into the gigahertz range, it opens the door for potential communications, potential remote sensing, right? You can do all sorts of things with it and potentially propulsion applications as well. >> Yeah, the thing to keep in mind here is that strain H strain, which is basically the signal strength, how much you're stretching space-time as a as a you know, delta X as a function of X, is on the order is goes as frequency squared. So, if you if you change the frequency from 1 hertz to 1 gigahertz, that's not nine orders of magnitude better signal strength. That's 18 orders of magnitude better signal strength. And then >> Whoa, fam. Hello. The strain on space-time increases as frequency squared. Wait a minute. So, as you increase your frequency, your strain increases exponentially. So, here you go. This is why you're not going to be seeing these effects except for under specific conditions. And exponential effects, those are my favorite ones. Exponential effects are my favorite ones. So, there you go. There's Gary Stevenson explaining the very first issue away. >> So, if you if you change the frequency from 1 Hz to 1 GHz, that's not nine orders of magnitude better signal strength, that's 18 orders of magnitude. >> 18 orders of magnitude by increasing your signal strength, by increasing your frequency. Now, you look at Salvatore Pais's patents and you go, "Whoa, there's a big crossover here." Salvatore Pais was also saying amplification of energy. Look at frequency. Look at the exponential growth in electromagnetism or at the magnetic field strength from frequency. >> better signal strength. And then the gravitational wave power goes up to the fourth power. Uh so, you know, you're getting watts instead of nanowatts or >> So, you're going from watts to nano from nanowatts to watts. That's how big of a jump this is. So, the biggest criticism that we've heard from the free energy microchips is they say, "Oh, well, you're getting these tiny amounts of energy. Scale it up." That's what they say to Sunny White. That's what they say to Garrett Moddel. They say, "Well, you got some picowatt of energy, but that's nothing." Now, enter Gary Stevenson and he's saying we can actually scale this up with an array. We can actually use a number of tricks to scale this up. >> picowatts. Uh and so, that's those are the real big gainers, and that's why you want to work with high frequencies is because of that strain of F squared dependence, and that gravitational wave power is F to the fourth power. Uh it's an enormous advantage from a signal strength point of view to go with higher frequencies. Mm. Okay. Okay. >> Yes, 18 zeros. >> So, the Josephson Junction part of this, this is really the new aspect. And I have a slide, if it's okay >> Chad, we're making the term Josephson Junction a household thing, too. I mean, it was already somewhat known, but we've gone from it being an obscure thing that people didn't really know about to now explain how Josephson Junctions are basically in every quantum device. >> I want to put this up. Let me do a screen share very quickly. And so, this is a graphic that you sent me that really describes an HWSC gazer. So, can you describe what this is for me, how it works, and >> Yeah, we're both looking at the same graphic cuz yours is kind of small, hard to read, but essentially what we're looking at is trying to force spin two transitions uh in in the quantum mechanical realm. Uh and so, how do we do that? Well, Fontana uh conceptualized, uh because he was a detector expert, that you could you could motivate a spin two transition by coupling an S-wave superconductor to a D-wave superconductor. Uh typically, a low-temperature superconductors S-wave typically for at least uh YBCO, uh it is a it is a D-wave. Uh now, I'm talking about D-wave and S-wave, uh the context I'm using these terms is um they're in they're in terms of orbital angular momentum symmetries. So, >> [clears throat] >> So, when you talk about the different types of superconductors, basically, we need different kinds of superconductors, and when you look at them, they have different atomic structures. Okay? Now, we can potentially make, he's going to mention this, we can make them pull both potentially out of the same material, and one of them could be like a doped version of it. Doped meaning you mess with the atomic structure to change its properties a little bit. So, imagine trying to fit a whole bunch of people in a room, change their orientation, and then doing that and and altering it a little bit. And in so, we change the process. The point being, if we set up this specific condition, this basically now turns into a tunnel where the light comes in one way, and the gravity waves come out, gravitational waves come out the other side. Wow. >> Looking at orbital angular momentum differences in the distribution inside these materials. Now, the individual gravitons are going to be too weak to measure individually. The trick is to make it a big enough powerful enough gravitational wave at a certain frequency that you can actually measure it with a a detector of the same design only flipped around. So, now you're getting a graviton in and getting photons out. >> So, here's another one of the major criticisms as well. Even if this works, how do you measure it? It's so small the effects that you can't even detect it from the background. So, he says, "We are going to get around this by amplifying it using an array and focusing it along a specific frequency." Focusing it along a specific frequency so that when we check that frequency, if we see the strong signal, we know that's coming from this little microchippy thing we made here. Wow. I mean, this is a directly testable thing at a bare minimum. >> Uh and so, the trick is then to get enough signal strength that you can actually measure it that way. So, that's that's number one. Number two is macroscopic coherence gain. If you can make a number of these junctions and you can separate them by one wavelength, you can get a coherent wave front. And the coherent wave front then doesn't doesn't linearly scale, it scales as n squared. So, we're playing two tricks here. We're going higher frequency to go frequency squared, and then we're also doing doing a number of emitters to go n squared. So, we're we're pulling out every trick we can to try to boost the signal strength. >> So, they're increasing the frequency and they're creating their array, which is e- each separated by exactly one wavelength. So, you have to have the array set set up in such a way where one wavelength hops from one to the next. Chat, I love this [ __ ] This is This is exactly This is what I'm going to watch before I go to sleep tonight, if you know what I mean, Chat. My goodness. Felony physics in full operation right now. >> Uh reciprocity of design, all that is referring to is that you can use the same kind of device flipped around as a detector, which was really Giorgio's specialty versus an emitter. You can use it as an emitter. >> Here you go. You wanted your ghost murmur technology? Here's your ghost murmur technology for you here, right here. Look at this. Emission mode and detection mode. Just think about this. How would I turn this into a detector? Oh, well, I'm going in this way, photon comes in, gravity gravity wave comes out. Well, on the other side, I'm just going to reverse it. Gravity wave comes in on this side, photon comes out. I sent in the signal on this side, I got the signal out on this side. You've got a phone. You've got a communication system now. Simple as that. Now, the question is how fast do gravita- gravitational waves travel? Do they travel instantly? Do they travel at the speed of light? Hm. We ha- If we needed a way to find our guy, all we needed If we needed to find that guy, that pilot in Iran, all we needed was for him to carry one of these devices and for us to have a device somewhere else, and we're going to be able to find him. Boom.