Cancel Two Waves and You Get a Gravity Wave, That Is Everything

Tom Bearden in chat. I could literally listen to this dude forever. All that. I'm pretty sure we watched this already. But, that's fine. I don't care.

I want to listen to a little bit of his voice. Let me hear some of your voice, sir. >> since 1900. Instead, the work of a single man who, quote, translated, unquote, Maxwell's work into the modern version of vector analysis, J- Oliver Heaviside. This work is taught as Maxwell's theory. It is a subset of Maxwell's theory that is taught today. And specifically, is it it is that subset which only applies when there is no interaction whatsoever between the gravitational field and the electromagnetic field.

We're going to show you the other part that got left out. First of all, the original theory, the first paper that Maxwell wrote, >> So, Tom Bearden jumps in on this presentation, and he's saying scalar physics is messed up. Or or not scalar physics, but um Maxwell's equations are messed up. And that if we look at Maxwell's equations closely, we find that electromagnetism and gravity are connected. Electromagnetism and gravity are actually connected. And he says, we need this math that was thrown out called quaternions.

What is a quaternion math? You're just a normal working-class person like me? Well, what's really going on here is we're trying to understand how things move around in our universe. And by our universe, I mean up, down, left, right, and back and forth. Three dimensions. Three spatial dimensions.

We're trying to figure out, how do I mathematically write down if this thing if my hand, my finger is moving in this direction, how do I explain this direction versus this direction versus this direction? And if you just do the normal three-dimensional math, things can cancel out, and then the math says there's nothing there. The math says if these two things cancel out, nothing's there. But the secret to scalar physics is that that's not right. That's objectively incorrect. That's a simplified version of our reality that does not hold up experimentally.

That's the rub. Is that we need another dimension to accurately explain what we see in real world when we try to apply this. It doesn't mean that it's entirely wrong. You can simplify the equations and still do most of the stuff that we need to do for electromagnetism, but you can't do gravity control. >> It was written in 1864 during the time of the American Civil War. It was >> Oops. >> as a unified field theory. It did contain a an engineerable and workable and experimental theory of gravity, but very few people recognized it for what it was.

Maxwell recognized it as the stress of space, but didn't understand that he had also grabbed a hold of gravity itself. >> The stress of space. Gravity is the stress of space. Think about that. This is Tom Bearden talking about in the '80s. Salvatore Pais just said it yesterday. Salvatore Pais said yesterday we can break if we stress space-time, stress it, we can break it.

And that's gravity. What does it say right there at the top? A vector potential. I'm pretty sure that's what it says. It's kind of I'm pretty sure it says A vector potential right there at the top. What's the secret sauce?

The A vector potential. If you don't know what that means, you need to start learning. >> And so, because it was written in quaternions, vector analysis, not having been invented yet or finished, it was written in a mathematics that was quite difficult >> to calculate in, and one which had very bizarre appearances of minus signs when intuition said there shouldn't be one there, and one which was devilishly difficult to calculate in. One which most scientists found quite distasteful. A quaternion differs from the present modern vector in that, in addition to the three vector components, you have a scalar component.

For example, >> So, there you go. When he says the three vector components, he's telling you the three spatial dimensions. Straight, you know, same thing I just said. Left, right, up, down, back, and forth. He's saying there's another component. There's also this Imagine it like this downward component that connects to the extra dimension.

Imagine it like that. It's an invisible downward component that's connecting this extra dimension, and this now explains quantum entanglement. If I create this component that spins to the extra dimension, it might spin up over here. This is why you see entanglement equal and opposite entanglement. Is carefully engineered vector potential is creating entanglement. >> Let us take a vector A. Obviously, the vector A today in uh little normal sophomore physics will start out with A sub I or A I plus B J plus C K, where I, J, and K are unit vectors orthogonal to each other.

If we take such a vector, for example, >> So, that that that math actually I understand the math now, Chad. I understand what this means. The A he's saying, "Okay, if I pick a vector, he's saying it has a straightforward uh integer number value. It has a left-right integer value. It has an up-down integer value. You add all those values together in a matrix, that gives you the direction."

He's saying, "That's not enough. You also need a scalar component." What is the scalar component? This is the rubber band analogy. So now, my vector is that way. And now I take another vector this way.

And now these two vectors are canceling each other out, just like Tom Bearden said. There's a force this way, and there's a force this way. But, if they cancel each other out, there's something left over in the rubber band. The stress in the rubber band is still being impacted, even though the forces are canceling each other out. If this force is stronger, it goes this way. If this force is stronger, it goes this way.

If the forces are equal, the rubber band stretches, the rubber band strains and stresses. This is what we're doing to space-time with electromagnetism. We are stressing space-time with electromagnetism, just like me pulling on this rubber band. That's the exact correct analogy. Yes, the Z axis. You say X, Y, Z, or X, you know, you get the point. >> And we cross it with itself, we will produce a zero vector resultant.

Now, I want to stop right there. Let me say that again. Rigorously, we will produce a zero vector resultant. Now, the two vectors didn't go anywhere. They're still acting upon each other. >> [clears throat] >> They're still there. So, very rigorously, what we produce is a zero vector system.

That is, a system of acting vectors which sums to a zero resultant vector. >> This is a zero vector system. Me pulling on this rubber band equally on both sides is a zero vector system. The vector going that way and the vector going that way, both are exactly the same. But, as you can see, I can do that and I can change the amount I'm pulling, and it's still a zero vector system. Someone asked, "What is the resonant frequency?" They were kind of joking, but not.

What is the actual frequency? I can't tell you. You want to know why? Because it depends. The resonant frequency is going to depend on what you're setting up and what you're doing. That's the rub.

It's not just one punch all. It's probably some factor of the Planck's constant, Planck frequency, if I had to guess. >> For translation, on the bottom we show the same situation in quaternions. The quaternion is expressed very similar to the vector, except it has this little scalar term W sitting in there. With one big difference, when I cross, for example, Q, the quaternion with itself, I do not get just a zero vector. The vector part still goes to the zero vector result. But now I have suddenly the emergence of a scalar part, which did not go away.

And the scalar part, it turns out, is in fact a function of the vectors that entered into the interaction. Notice on the bottom line that the cross product now is the square of the amplitude of one of the vectors. That's the urgency or the energy or the urgency of one vector on the other, stress lines. And I've retained the zero vector because now >> So, he's saying the scalar energy is squaring under the right conditions. He's saying, "If the scalar component interferes with itself, it can actually create an amplification effect." He's saying, "You've thrown out this, and you didn't realize the hugest part."

And now, if you take these waves and cross them, the scalar potential can amplify. That's what that math is showing right there. That's why it has A squared. Cuz that component that's left over can interact and interfere with itself. In some cases, it can balance out and do nothing. In other cases, it can amplify.

This is probably what Salvatore Pais is getting at when he's talking about amplification of energy. >> Now, we have to learn to read that exactly, which is what Heaviside did not do. What this equation says, and says very rigorously, is is this. If these are two electromagnetic vectors of what quaternions we started with, suppose they are the E fields, and the two E fields, for example, the two E vectors identical, and we have an operation that's making the cross product. Suppose that's what's actually going on.

What the bottom equation rigorously says is electromagnetically, you have a zero vector resultant with the system of two vectors still inside the zero vector system and still acting, producing the action A squared. Now, A squared is proportional up to the energy of one of the vectors, the amplitude energy. >> Wow. So, then he says, "Now, don't just make it vectors. Now, make this electromagnetism, electric charge." He says, "Make this electric charge, because electric charge is just a wave, electromagnetic wave. And now, if I cross these two electromagnetic waves together, now I have a proportion to energy.

Now, I have a A squared is proportional to the input energy." Now, what he's saying is now there's an engineering way to amplify energy. >> The urgency, so to speak, energetic urgency of one vector on the other. So, we've captured a form of stress. And now, suppose, for example, we're instead of dealing with static vectors, we're dealing with actual sine waves. Again, our Q cross Q is going to be >> So, now he says, "Okay, now it's just not a static vector, like a line, now it's a wave. Now there're two waves that are intersecting.

So, now there're sine waves. Okay? >> square plus the zero vector result in the electromagnetically. I must say all that because I must not throw the zero vector away. It's a real thing. It's a vacuum engine, as a matter of fact. It is not a zero except electromagnetically, but it's doing something else in the vacuum.

Suppose Q is of the form Q is equal to A sine omega T, standard kind of wave, simple sine wave type entity. Then Q Q cross Q will give you A squared sine squared omega T plus this zero vector. How do you read that? The way you read that equation rigorously, you don't throw the zero vector away. It's telling you something. It says, "I have a zero vector electromagnetic system whose active internal structure is giving me a scalar wave A squared sine squared omega T."

That's precisely what that equation says. >> And you look at this and you go, "There's almost multiple levels, but this is scalar physics is the answer." Tom Bearden's giving it to you at the highest level. He's telling you the theory. He's saying the answer to manipulate gravity is create two waves that are canceling each other out. Use that stress to bring down That or that is your mechanism to engineer breaking space-time. Salvatore Pais is saying we can hit a resonant frequency that brings down the energy requirement.

And Dan Winter, who I just spoke to, you guys watch the interview on Saturday, he's saying this is how it actually works. He's saying if you look at how these waves are interfering inter connecting, he's saying the way that works to create the magic is a non-destructive charge collapse. Terence Barrett, David Froning's right-hand man who is doing scalar physics. This is why he got asked about it cuz what he was actually engineering was Bearden's principles. The reason why he's polarizing the electromagnetic wave, changing its phase, is because of what Tom Bearden's saying here.

Tom Bearden's saying if you can get this thing to cancel out perfectly, you can get gravity effects. So, he's saying, "Oh, maybe I can engineer that." Now, I'm not saying Terence Barrett got his idea from Tom Bearden. I'm saying they're converging on the on the truth. The truth is right there in spin, in compression, in vortex motion. It's right there. >> Now, when you threw away the quaternion scalar part, you threw away the scalar wave.

And notice that in the scalar wave, the energy, which is proportional to the A squared, is rhythmically varying. If the energy density of the local vacuum where this action is occurring is rhythmically varying, then rigorously, that is the definition of a local gravitational wave. And that is your precise definition or derivation of scalar electromagnetic. >> Wow. So, he's saying if you've done this, if you've canceled this out with two sine waves, then the energy of space time where you're doing this is varying. That's crazy. Think about this.

What that A squared sine squared represents, that scalar potential, what it represents is where your two electromagnetic waves perfectly cancel out, the resultant is also a sine wave. The resultant is not perfectly flat. The result is the energy density of this space time where those waves are hitting each other is fluctuating. It's fluctuating. As the waves hit each other, the space time energy fluctuates up and down. And he's saying, "Because you've made the space time energy fluctuate up and down in this region, that's a gravity wave."

We just created a gravity wave. All it takes to create a gravity wave is change the energy density in a point in this point right here. Change the energy density right here, shoot it up, and then have it go back down again. And Tom Bearden's saying the way you do that is just have some powerful electromagnetic waves cancel each other out that point where it happens, boom. So now you say, "Ashton, what's going on inside the orbs? How is fusion happening?"

This is how they're doing it. Two electromagnetic waves that are converging just like this. They're intersecting, they're canceling out, and then they're producing a gravitational wave where in their point they're creating a gravity wave that's going up and down. The energy density of space time at the center is going up and down. This is creating a gravitational ripple, and they're riding the wave. They're just riding the wave. >> Yes.

I will say one thing. >> And by the way, you know what? Now I'll show you that, okay? It's one thing to tell you. It's a whole 'nother thing to say, "Hey, you want to see it? You want to see it with your eyes?" Is there here?

Look at it. Doesn't it look like they're creating a gravity wave? How are they flying around like that? How can they match the speed of an airplane like that with no effort? Matching the speed with no effort whatsoever. Moving around, looks like there's no resistance.

Can you imagine an airplane spinning around like that, flying around like that? That easily? That's definitely producing gravitational waves. Those orbs are producing gravitational waves. The dark lines are certainly a byproduct of the propulsion mechanism that's going on. Look at the dark lines on these things.

Those dark lines are definitely the byproduct of that interaction going on inside. This is why I pinged Sal when I found out about that magnetic reconnection AC Holt and I said, "Are these things extracting zero point energy?" Cuz yeah, essentially. That gravitational wave represents or can represent extraction of zero point energy, too. That's the rub. Okay, let's go back.

I'm going to watch it teleport away. Watch how fast. I mean, that's like what? Less than 0.1 seconds, I would say. Pretty close. Like that thing is gone instantly. >> and passing and go on without further explanation because it takes a long time to explain it. That particular wave, the sine squared wave, scalar wave, is most useful indeed in electromagnetic healing.

It has the unique characteristic, if you will break that wave out and look at it on your little graph plots, it has a most unique characteristics that almost no other wave has. A very weak wave of that exact configuration. >> Now, we say, "Why is vortex motion so important?" Watch this. >> Okay, we have a new breed of cat now, the scalar EM wave. It's rigorous. You can mathematically derive it. You can try it out on a lab bench and it works.

But it works quite different from normal electromagnetic waves. So, all you electrical boys, you got to remember now, you got to learn some new phenomenology. They didn't teach you this one in electrical engineering. And if you look >> This is the part is you have to learn a little bit of new lingo, you know? It's not that you have to learn new physics, you have to learn a little new lingo. >> And circuits that work this way, and you insist you're going to look at them with electrical engineering eyes, you're going to go home thinking that that can't possibly work and it's all nonsense.

And you will never, never be able to build such circuits and such devices. You've got to learn to think in a different manner. The first place, this wave goes right straight through the electron shell. Goes down the nucleus. Well, we're going to tackle with something very fundamental here. Let's ask a very fundamental question.

What is this physical reality around us? How is it made? Everything is made from potentials according to quantum mechanics, the most modern theory. Now, operators, forget your force fields, your E field and your B field. That's secondary junk that comes after the operator works on the potentials. The potentials are gravitational fields.

Gravitational potential. All potentials are. >> The potentials, homies. The potentials are what's real. The potentials. We don't see the potentials as real. We see the fields as our physical reality.

This is why magic becomes possible. Because the fields are an illusion. What's really primal is the is the potentials.