I was WRONG

and the stability of the political solution. It might work. But we have tried it for a long period. I do not believe that purely technical means will succeed. I do believe that as long as only and please take what I say literally, as long as we talk only about weapons of attack, political solutions may be very hard to find.

If we can develop methods of defense, not weapons of mass destruction, but weapons aimed at the weapons of mass destruction, anti-weapons, if we can develop these, then we could be in a more stable situation. >> Ashton Forbes, you know that super jacked guy? >> Malaysian 370 contact Ho Chi Minh 120.9er. Good night. >> Breaking news tonight, a Malaysia Airlines flight with [music] 239 people on board including four Americans has gone [music] missing. >> Even as these grainy satellite images released today by the Chinese government >> Again, the the Malaysian flight, too,

was a [music] was one shot at China saying knock it off. >> Why shoot it again though if it's not hostile? >> Our technologies permit us to manipulate time [music] and space. >> Why the Americans would? >> Any distance annihilated. [music] >> This country's very powerful. >> Far more powerful than people understand. >> We have [music] weaponry that nobody has any idea what it is and it is the most powerful weapons in the world. Not even close. >> I remember the >> [music] >> line from the Hindu scriptures, the Bhagavad Gita.

Vishnu >> [music] >> is trying to persuade the prince that >> [music] >> he should do his duty. And when to impress him, >> [music] >> takes on his multi-armed form, and says, "Now I am become death, [music] the destroyer of worlds." I suppose we all thought that, one way or another. >> Let's go, everybody. Wow, chat is moving today. OMG, guys, right off the bat, it is happening. Yes, it is happening, guys.

It is time to make things occur. What do I mean? Captain vague post? I mean, we're doing it. I'm meeting with the experts. I'm getting the experts, and I do mean plural, on the record.

We're proving MH370 was United States operation, and I'm putting the whole thing to bed. I'm tired of morons on the internet pretending to be VFX experts and lying about real military videos that leaked on the internet. So, what I want to tell right now, all of the debunkers, please listen closely. You have never for 1 minute considered that maybe you are wrong. And that maybe those videos are real, and that you've been hallucinating comparisons to debunk them. You should have been considering that, and you should do so right now.

You should be saying to yourself, "Am I willing to pay the consequences for being wrong and helping cover up what happened to 239 people?" Okay, sorry about that, guys. We are back. Computer crashed right in the middle of my epic speech hating on the debunkers. That's the second time that's happened in two live streams. So, either someone has hacked into my computer and is turning it off at will or whatever. I've got a I've got a bug on my computer.

Anyway, it doesn't matter. I'm going to have to get a new one. Sorry, guys. Let's focus on task at hand. Tonight, there's only a few main topics I want to go over. One, we are going to talk a little bit about physics.

There is an extra dimension has been proven and we're going to go over the Sabine Hossenfelder Felder video on it. Number two, what I was talking about previously in terms of speaking to some experts. Again, I'm keeping it intentionally vague, but we're going to chat about it because MH370 is back. And I need your help. This is interactive. This is a live stream to figure out what are the questions that we need to ask.

What do you want to hear that's the most compelling to prove that the videos are real? Obviously, well, actually, okay. That's all I'm going to say about that. Now, the other thing, and let's get into it right now, is some politics. We need a chat about a little politics that is going on on the internet. You might say, "Ashton, are you going to talk about Ilhan Omar some more because you've been right about her the whole time?"

No, actually, but yes, I have been right about her. Thank you, other Ashton. Yes, Ilhan Omar is probably not an American citizen. Why do I say that? Because she was born in 1981 and that means that she was 19 in the year 2000 and not eligible for the asylum that she claims that she received. So, it's pretty simple.

It's pretty cut and dry. I don't really need to go deeper than that. I don't need it to be a racial thing or anything about marrying her brother. And if she's not an American citizen, then she needs to get out and she obviously can't serve in Congress. So, there There And if this upsets you about the rule, the letter of the law, then this is the first thing that I want to address, which is pretty much right off the hot off the presses here. We have three quick political thing political topics that I need to address and talk about here.

Number one is this. Uh where is it? >> [clears throat] >> Um The Minnesota has decided to charge James O'Keefe and Cam Higbie for pretending to vote and when they were doing an undercover video to show how easy it was for illegals to vote. >> videos of themselves on the day of the primary election this August 11th. A group of people were attempting to cast doubt on the state's vouching system by posting videos of themselves on social media. We were alerted to this conduct by the Minnesota Secretary of State's office. This conduct has been the subject of investigation and review. That review is now complete.

Today, we are charging two individuals, James O'Keefe and Cameron Higbie, with felony counts of unlawful voting and identity theft. >> Identity theft. >> Free and fair elections are the bedrock of democracy and their protection is one of our highest priorities. >> Are Are these people trolling? This is They're obviously trolling, right? Okay. Number one. How can you pretend to be against this Ilhan Omar investigation, which it is pretending if you're if you're being against this, when I just laid out that she just simply was not born in 1982, therefore cannot be a citizen according to her own claims?

Then you're going to support fascism like this? There's no ambiguity. James O'Keefe is a notorious undercover journalist. That's what he was doing. Everybody knows that she knows it, we know it. To pretend like he was trying to evade the trying to do voter fraud or impersonate someone else, like you're just pretending. Nobody thinks that.

And then you're trying to throw the book at them in a situation where nobody's ever been charged with anything like this before for circumstances like this. And then to come out and pretend like, "Oh, it's it's actually Ilhan Omar, the fascists are going after it." This is what using the government to go after your political enemies looks like. This is it right here. Fascism, you're staring at it. This is objectively fascism.

This is objectively going after your enemies and political prosecution. There's no basis for this. In any normal, non-clown world, this would not be happening. You can watch the undercover video. They recorded themselves doing it. Their whole point was showing that you can just come in, make a claim, and vote, and then they'll let you in.

This is just punishment because they exposed how easy it was to commit fraud. And now, the hilarious trolling irony is that they're trying to charge them with the fraud that they were going to expose. Okay, man, just stop trolling. You're making an embarrassment of my home state. Now, why do I care? That was a good question.

Why do I care about this? Why do I care about the Ilhan Omar situation? Because free energy and teleportation is something that the way they were able to hide this is not some conspiracy master plan. I mean, it is at the end of the day. But, that's not what allowed it to persist. What allowed them to get away with it is all this little corruption. All of us just turning a blind eye to the reality of the world for so long and pretending that it's different than it really is.

That's the truth. And so, This is something I said just a couple weeks ago. I'm not a conspiracy theorist, a UFO guy. I'm an anti-hypocrisy guy. I hate hypocrisy and [ __ ] everywhere that I see it. The ultimate form of that is hiding free energy and and warp drives, which still unbelievable to me, but true.

So when I see this level of garbage, it upsets me just like when I see people prosecuting J6ers for walking into a public building in an orderly fashion. And then you claim that they're violent violent seditionists that need to be put in solitary confinement. I mean, we just have to look at objective reality. >> [sighs] >> So ultimately, I don't really care that much about it. Now, let's talk about some other political topics. Number one, Hasan Piker's suing Scott Jennings. Why do I give a [ __ ] about this?

I find it actually pretty interesting. Where is the clip? >> [snorts] >> Um >> [clears throat] >> Yeah, okay. Here we go. So Hasan [ __ ] is sued Scott Jennings because Scott Jennings found a clip on the internet and said, "Oh, this is Hasan [ __ ] says the N-word." And there's a clip of Hasan [ __ ] saying the N-word on his Young Turks channel. Now, it's edited out of context.

He's saying it in the context of, you know, this is what somebody else said, something like that. I don't I think it's justified personally cuz I'm not a person who gets upset about words. But that's what happened. And so Scott Jennings said it out of context. Now, Hasan [ __ ] has decided he's going to sue him over this for defamation. Now, this is going to get thrown out.

And the reason why it's going to get thrown out is because there's huge leeway in the United States government or in the United States over defamation for public figures. In fact, Hasan [ __ ] himself is guilty of this multiple times, taking things intentionally out of context. You can see Candace Owens do this all the time. Basically, Candace Owens does everything She did it yesterday. Candace Owens claimed that she was dismissed from the Macron lawsuit, but she was only personally dismissed. Her companies are still in the lawsuit.

But that's exactly it, right? You take it out of context, you lie. That's what pretty much everybody does on the internet. I hate it. And again, why are you talking about this? Because I hate this level of hypocrisy.

That's why I'm talking about it. So, anyway, here's a clip. I'm going to play this Andrew Kolvik clip because people hate Andrew Kolvik. I like to just troll people. A lot of people hate Andrew Kolvik, so here's shout-out to him.

Andrew Kolvik TPUSA Here is Here's a >> except that he mischaracterized this specific remark of Hasan [ __ ] Hasan [ __ ] has said plenty of contemptible and violent and disparaging things about all sorts of groups right when he said I can't even say it on TV what he said that dissidents speaking out against communists should go do to him or to themselves or whatever. Um he did not he he said these words. It just in context, that's not what he meant. He was not calling for harms to black people.

Um I don't think this lawsuit is going to succeed because they're both public figures, and so the standards in um defamation law are are it it's harder to much harder to prove. You'd have to show that Scott Jennings acted with actual malice, that he knew in his heart or or really should have known uh that that's not what what um what Hasan [ __ ] had said, and I I think you're just going to very much struggle to prove that. I I I believe >> So, that's exactly correct. From a legal perspective, that's exactly correct.

The issue is how do you prove that in somebody's heart they didn't know that clip was out out and that they knew they were lying about you. That's it literally impossible to prove. How do you prove someone's intentions? And that's what this lawsuit amounts to and why it's going to fail 100%. >> Scott Jennings [clears throat] probably saw this clip out of context only and said that that that he said that because his on breaker again has a history of disparaging I don't know and like if black people I mean in the context of the Michigan election, right? And of Abdul El-Sayed.

So, him disparaging >> Okay. Now, the reason I'm playing this clip actually wasn't that. I could have said that. I just want you to see his reaction to this is the weirdest part. His reaction to that is this. >> Oh my god, dude. Ay ay ay.

Like insufferable. Okay, he knows this is a lie. I've spent my entire life my entire professional life fighting against white supremacy. Okay? It's just so >> You've spent your life fighting white supremacy? How delusional are these people?

What reality are you listen are you living in that you think you spent 1 second of your life fighting white supremacy? Which white supremacists have you got thrown in prison? Or actually Oh, you mean like you play you pretend on the internet that that you're fighting against evildoers when it's just normal people giving their normal opinions? And you literally call everyone a Nazi or a pedophile that disagrees with you? And now you're going to go ahead and and sue somebody else for taking something out of context? Holy [ __ ] are you mentally ill?

This is the Redditors hero? This is Okay, Democrats go with this guy. Democrats, I want you to go all in on this guy as your political pundit. Apparently, you picked the dumbest human being on the planet. Now, with respect to this lawsuit, the other thing that's upsetting about this is that he publicly immediately posted helping for fundraising for this lawsuit. I couldn't even imagine myself begging for money for a lawsuit and I considered one.

I considered a lawsuit against Dave Farina. If you don't know who Dave Farina is, he's the guy that pretends to be a professor, pretends to understand science and physics, but all he does is make defamatory videos about people. He made two about me. They're like 45 minutes long, not just like a 5-second spot that that Scott Jennings said, like 45-minute videos that are defamatory that hit hundreds of thousands of views that people constantly ask me about. All the claims related to me are all false.

But when you talk to a lawyer, what they'll tell you is this, they'll tell you I'm going to tell you what the lawyer told me. They'll tell you this is prohibitively expensive to even go down the route whether or not it's right or not. You're looking at six figures just to get a initial verdict, $100,000, $10,000 retainer just to start with. Billable hours probably 250 to 500 per hour that they spend on your case.

No guarantee that they're going to win, nobody's going to take this on a contingency meaning they're not going to take this and say, "Oh yeah, we'll take the case and then if we win, we'll get paid." Nobody's do Nobody does that. Defamation lawsuits like this and then on top of the burden of actual malice, the highest possible burden, which is essentially impossible to prove unless you have some documentation that says they were intending to lie about you, there's no chance.

So, what that means is that this person is now just fundraising asking as a socialist their audience to support their frivolous lawsuit against somebody that they don't like. Gross. Anyway, that's the only reason why I didn't Sue Professor Dave. What he did say about me absolutely defamatory. I've never scammed anybody and free energy is absolutely real. The fact that he doesn't understand that just means that he's an idiot doesn't know any physics, but a lot of people don't.

So let's switch gears for a second. >> [clears throat] >> Let's talk a little physics since I see some of you being bored, pretending to be bored. Screw you people. Sabine Hossenfelder made a new video today and actually it intrigued me. Claims of a fifth dimension. So a lot of fake experts like to pretend that they understand physics. And this is a really good example of it.

Actually, I do I have the whole video? I think I have the whole video here. You know what? At least I'll say this because I say I've been saying going in increasingly negative about Sabine Hossenfelder and said a lot of negative things about her. So I'll go ahead and say this. At least respect to her that she hasn't blocked me.

A lot of clowns would have blocked me for a lot less. You can see my replies are usually a good percentage of the of the likes underneath her posts. And she still hasn't blocked me or run away. So I'll at least give her that. She is absolutely horrifically wrong about physics, but that's a different issue. And that's a professional issue that we can professionally disagree on.

It's just kind of annoying because I'm trying to hurry along this whole solving and unification of physics thing. >> [clears throat] >> Yes, that was me watching Jinwoo versus the Ant King. Watch that [ __ ] on repeat. Oh, so good. Okay. >> [clears throat] >> Here we go. Okay, so did we discover some new physics? Let's see. >> The researchers were particularly interested in collisions that produce what's called jets.

For particle physicists, a jet is a spray of particles that appears when an energetic quark or gluon emerges from a collision. Quarks are the constituents of protons and neutrons, and gluons are the particles that hold quarks together. By measuring the energy and direction of these sprays, physicists can reconstruct the masses of heavier particles that might have produced them. >> Fun fact, I know someone who sat at an airport working on slides about collisions and jets and nuclear physics and was asked to please step aside into a small room for some questions. True story. But back to the >> Wait, what did she just say? Wait.

Rewind, chat. Did you guys just hear what she just said? I know someone who sat at an airport working on slides about collisions and jets and nuclear physics and was asked to please step aside into a small room for some questions. True story. But back to extra dimensions. That's why you come here, chat, for that felony physics, for that magnetic reconnection.

Remember, magnetic reconnection is a fun word to say and it's even a more fun phenomenon to study. Remember, I keep saying it for no reason, but just keep that those words locked in your memory forever. Magnetic reconnection, extremely important. Anyway, super weird. How did I miss this first time I watched? Anyway, here we go. >> for some questions.

True story. But back to the extra dimensions. That the Large Hadron Collider might find evidence for additional dimensions of space was one of the most exciting prospects when I was a student. Indeed, it's what I wrote my PhD thesis about. You see that >> She wrote her PhD thesis about extra dimensions and she still can't figure it out. And by the way, if you want to understand why I'm so harsh on these people, it's because I'm from the future and I've seen the truth and I'm trying to tell it to you and you're just rejecting reality.

Even when I explain it to you, even when I go through the papers for you, you know how frustrating it is? I'd rather work with special needs people all day. At least they can learn. You people can't even learn. My goodness. Okay, anyway, here we go.

Sorry. Crashing out today, chat. Crashing out. >> Relationists thought if there are additional dimensions of space, they must be small. They must be curled up to small radius. And then the wavelengths of the particles must fit into the radius. This it means that every particle that enters extra dimensions have higher harmonic standing waves in the extra dimensions.

And the higher the harmonics, the higher the energy of the particles. The >> Okay, I don't know what that means, but yes, yes, all of that. All of that, yes, extra harmonic, sure, whatever, extra dimension, yes. First of all, energy is matter is just energy trapped in a wave, just like that. You can imagine, here you go, chat. I'll make it easy for you.

Remember, I'm from the future, from the future, okay? You're going forward on a path, okay? You're this you this is you. Ooh, look at you. But now I change the geometry of space-time such that you going forward in a line actually curls back around and you end up where you began. This is the equivalent if I go off the screen over here and then I show up on the screen over here on this other side.

Okay? I'm still walking forward, but the geometry geometry of space-time has been folded, changed. Okay? Good. >> These physicists now say that the Large Hadron Collider has seen heavy versions of gluons with masses of about 3.6 and 8.6 teraelectronvolts. These decay into heavier versions of quarks, and these then decay into these jets. They found evidence for this in data collected by CMS between 2016 and 2018, and that run CMS saw two particularly interesting events, each p- >> Okay, okay.

So, another thing I need to point out here, the data's from 2016 and 2018. Why is this guy being referenced in here? By the way, this is got to be the spookiest, weirdo guy ever, this Matt Pines guy. Comes out of nowhere, some kind of weird consultant, and now he's leading some kind of AI company, and has connections to the government. Yeah, exactly how it Yeah, exactly how it works, the backroom deals.

Anyway. >> [clears throat and cough] >> So, we find this data from 2016 to 2018 in the Large Hadron Collider, and now we're just looking at Have we been missing this data for the last 8 years? I'm sorry to be skeptical, but I if they're hiding If there are extra dimensions and free energy is available, the Large Hadron Collider has to have the data in there that's proven it. And I've been saying this, I've been saying they've got to be covering it up at some level in the process. Either they're just not looking for it, they're just not reporting on it, you know, well, something.

But now you're saying that they just found some data from 10 years ago? Well, terabytes of data is great, but if it doesn't mean anything, what's the deal? And if there's just data that can solve extra dimensions, how come we weren't looking at it? It was just a lot? It's not a really good excuse, man. Anyway. >> produced four jets with a very high combined mass.

You can see the suspicious events here in this figure. It's the two dots up here. They say that depending on how you look at it, they stand out at 3.6 to 4 sigma. So that falls short of the 5 sigma discovery threshold, but it's more than just a little odd. They say that the data >> Um do you guys understand the words she just said? First of all, let's just look at the graph.

There's an actual graph. You can just see the data points that are the anomalous data points. Yeah. Pretty damn clear. Those stand out a lot on the top right from this other huge blob right here. And they say, "Okay, well, depending on how you interpret this, that's four standard deviations away from the mean."

What they're saying is those two dots should be in this other blob in the bottom left down here. But these are way up here. And keep in mind, LHC is an extremely controlled environment. You might say, "Oh, well, there was just some interference." Interference from what? This is a controlled setup.

That's the rub. So here's the problem. What am I supposed to believe? Am I supposed to believe my lying eyes? There's the data points right there. Four standard deviations is 99.9%.

99.99%. I think it was roughly 1 in 30,000 probability that it is wrong. So what these people are saying is we found some crazy data points, some observational data, and it doesn't fit within the normal bounds of what we're expecting. By 1 one in 30,000. Yeah, I'd say it's pretty good. So, what are Sabine Hossenfelder's retorts to the data? >> The two dots up here, they say that depending on how you look at it, they stand out at a 3.6 to 4 sigma.

So, that falls short of the 5 sigma discovery threshold, but it's more than just a little odd. They say that the data from CMS run 3 could cross the discovery threshold. Their analysis is quite interesting because it's not just any sort of extra dimension they find, they find evidence for what's specifically called the Randall-Sundrum scenario. In this case, there's only one extra dimension and it has a cosmological constant in the run >> Holy [ __ ] chat. When they say it has a cosmological constant, that means there's a preferred frame of reference. It's exactly what it means.

I'm I'm a physicist, that's how I know, chat. I don't have to Google it or anything. I know that's what it means. It has its own cosmological constant? Yeah. That means there's a universal preferred reference frame.

One extra dimension, exactly. Exactly one extra dimension. It's Kaluza-Klein. I think either video even has Kaluza-Klein referenced on the top earlier, somewhere back here. Let me just go back. Where does it say the Kaluza-Klein thing?

There Was that it? Yeah, here it is. Evidence for Kaluza-Klein excitations of the graviton, gluon, and quark. It's exactly referencing Kaluza-Klein. So, if you wonder Ashton's making this extra dimension thing up, this is actually exactly referencing the same physics that I'm referencing, precisely. One extra dimension, exactly one extra dimension.

Thank you. I don't know if this is meant as a a compliment, but I'm going to take it as a compliment. Thank you. Exactly one extra dimension. Okay. >> And it has a cosmological constant. In the Randall-Sundrum scenario, the masses of the particles are not equally spaced, and that fits the data best. But, there are some problems with this analysis.

First, the CMS run 3 data is already out, and they haven't seen any further of these jets. Second, the idea of heavy gluons decaying into heavy quarks is contradicted by other data. The authors acknowledge this problem, but basically just say, "Well, then the extra dimension is somehow more complicated." Third, the >> Okay, so first problem, further set of data doesn't have the anomalies, okay? Doesn't rule it out, but doesn't confirm it, either.

Next thing it says, "Oh, there's some other set of data," which he doesn't seem to specify, but just says that the uh the researchers address it, and they say that basically, "There must be something we don't understand." Yeah, exactly. If there's an extra dimension, then obviously we have been missing a big part of physics. Pretty clear. So, I don't know why that's a knock against them. But, okay.

Now, what else? That's Those are your main criticisms? What else? Seems pretty light. >> The authors claimed last year to have seen evidence for a heavier versions of graviton, but a hypothetical particles that could carry the gravitational force that turned out to be a composite particle of a top and an anti-top quark. So, these >> So, what's I don't even understand what the third criticism is. The third criticism isn't even a criticism of their paper.

The third criticism is like, "Hey, last year they had some other experiment that was explained some other way." Okay. >> That's clearly not accounting very well for standard physics in the >> So, now she's just attacking them personally. Oh, so because they didn't they because some people came up with an alternate explanation for their previous paper, they're obviously not doing good physics. What the [ __ ] are you talking about? This is the kind of woke boomer [ __ ] that I just can't stand. Is she doing this intentionally?

I think these people like really just get on their own little high horse, huh? And this is why she deserves the ridicule that she's going to get. You She does it to everybody else. This is the same as the Hasan [ __ ] [ __ ] All these people are saying they're [ __ ] hypocrites. Same with the Redditors that are debunking the videos on their high horse and they think they're so smart. Okay, well then we're going to treat you the way that you treat other people when it turns out you were the thing that you were criticizing.

I hope this is clear for everybody. If you're a physicist that goes out there telling other people they do bad physics and they don't know what they're talking about, we're going to do that to you. That's why I do it to her. If you're somebody out there that's going to say these videos are fake.

Oh, no, you're so stupid and a conspiracy theorist and and you're grifting people and scamming people for saying that they're real, then we're going to we're going to say that you were the help cover up the United the this what happened to the the plane for the United States government, you personally. We're going to turn it back around on you and we're going to use your arguments and what you want done on to you. So that you know how it feels what you do to other people.

I hope that's clear to everybody because I don't want to hear any whining later on about Ashton, why are you so you're such an [ __ ] to people? You're so mean. No, they deserve it. Everybody I do it to deserves it. Every single one. Every single person that I rip on deserves it. >> Cosplays, they say so why I'm sorry, but I give this a nine out of 10 on the [ __ ] meter.

I don't doubt that these events exist or that they are all but I do not for a second buy the extra dimension story. And >> I think the events are real, but I'm just not going to believe it anyway. Really good physics, Sabine. Real good science. I'm very impressed. No real refutations of any of their work.

You just don't like it, and they did work you didn't like previously, so you're going to give it a nine out of 10 on your [ __ ] meter, and then just put some stupid graphics up. And you're going to probably have a thousand comments are going, "Sabine Hossenfelder, another 10 out of >> 10 video." Holy [ __ ] You are just the worst. >> What I think is going on here instead is that particle physicists are desperately searching for something, anything interesting in the data that could justify building a bigger collider. Why? >> No, I don't think that's what's going on.

I don't think that what people are doing is looking for a bigger collider. I think that what people are doing is they're trying to actually do science and physics and try to get the answer to unification because there must be an answer to unification. Now, I don't remember if I played this. If I did, I apologize. I'm pretty tired recently, but no, I think this is new. Here's another example that goes along with it.

Double dose of physics for you tonight. I don't want to hear any bitching in the chat, in the comments about politics. Oh, we talked about politics again. Just stick to the UFOs. Don't you I swear to god, Chad. Double physics for you. >> measure a different >> Time dilation was also proven true, spoiler alert.

Time dilation was proven true, which means that time really is a dial, exactly like I said. It means that time is a dial that can be slowed and sped up. 100%. It means time travel is real. It means I'm from the future, too. Yes, means that.

I mean that, 100%. Not joking. Okay, here we go. >> If the measure a different angle on the slope, well, that's evidence that general relativity might stop working at [music] this level. >> Okay, so by the way, this is a 35-minute long Veritasium video. I watched the whole thing waiting for the cliffhanger they're talking about laser beams and exciting atoms, all very cool stuff and not nothing related to the topic which is supposedly disproving general relativity. I was waiting for time dilation to get disproven. This was the big moment.

At 33 minutes into the video, Okay, what's it going to be? What's the answer, chat? Is time dilation going to get proven or disproven? >> So, a few weeks later, we hopped on a call with the team to check out what the data is saying. >> Is Einstein still right? >> I'm going to answer that two ways. The first is a very simple answer, which is yes. >> Okay. >> We have no evidence that says no. The second answer is that we're still analyzing the data.

So, you're down at sort of the 13th digit and a little change at sort of the a millionth of that slope is what you're looking for when you're looking for new physics. So, it's a very small change. >> I mean >> This is the most clickbait Veritasium video they've ever made. Womp womp. So, what's the data? Did you find some new physics? Uh no. Nope.

Nope, time dilation checks out perfectly, it turns out. Okay, so you just did this whole big video, this whole big experiment, and there is actually turns out time dilation was still a perfectly true and we didn't find anything. Wow, amazing, chat. Almost like I've been saying, we don't actually need new physics. And here's the beauty of this. I'll answer that question about the preppers in a second.

What they were doing is they were trying to see if they can find and prove that general relativity doesn't work on the quantum scale. They basically set up two laser contraptions, one really up high and one further down on the ground so they have different gravity levels. Okay? And then they compared the time the the the delay between them. The delay is going to be different because of the paths are longer or shorter between the two. So, they were actually testing general relativity at the quantum level.

And they found out it holds up. But wait. But wait, we get taught that there's a whole new level of physics that happens at the quantum level. These guys were trying to find new physics at the quantum level. And they didn't find it. Why?

Because there is no new physics at the quantum level. It's the same physics. Here's the answer to physics that nobody really wants to address and face. There is only one physics. There's no alien physics. There's really no quantum physics, either.

General relativity and quantum physics all work by the same principles. And the reason why we're struggling and the reason why we've invented two different sets of physics for quantum mechanics and then general relativity, the big stuff, is because we don't really understand general relativity. Our model of general relativity is incomplete. If you add one extra dimension, just like that paper we just looked at, then you can solve this problem. That's all it takes. It's actually, yes, that simple.

Once you add an extra dimension, now everything becomes something called scale invariant, which means the things at the big level also happen at the small level. The same planets and solar systems we see at the large level happen at the tiny level, too. Scale invariance. And now we don't need dark matter and dark energy anymore, either. How convenient is that? If we just add an extra dimension filled with zero point energy, which exists, we don't need dark energy, dark matter. to solve all the problems in physics and we can unify physics just like that.

Do you think we should research that? I mean, sounds pretty useful. Sounds like it might bear fruit. Nah, we spend $0 researching it. Amazing. Absolutely incredible.

So, there is no new physics. Now, that Edward Teller clip in the beginning. Here's the short version of it again. >> and the stability of the political solution. >> I'm going to skip to the good part. >> third effect. If we can develop methods of defense, not weapons of mass destruction, but weapons aimed at the weapons of mass destruction, anti-weapons. If we can develop these, then we could be in a more stable situation. >> If we can develop weapons, not weapons of attack, but weapons of defense, aimed at the weapons of mass destruction, then then we could aim for peace. Whoa, chat.

Anti-weapons? Whoa, Tom Hudson. Good find, Tom Hudson. Holy smokes, chat. We're looking at three orbs teleporting an airplane that could quite easily be used to teleport an ICBM. Easily teleport an ICBM.

And now I'm listening to Edward Teller from I don't know what year was this. Decades ago? 1987. The context of this was SDI. He mentions SDI multiple times, Strategic Defense Initiative under Reagan. The Cold War.

Wow. Or at least after the Cold War. Woah, watch out. Creepy. Here's a link to that if you want it yourself, by the way, guys. Before I close this.

1987. I'm going to probably put that in the intro. That's one of those things I'm obsessed with the old Manhattan Project guys. I'm obsessed with them. I'm obsessed with their knowledge of nuclear weapons and what they were hiding. And I'm pretty sure they came up with some kind of pact to keep free energy hidden forever, at least for another 100 years or 50 years.

We were never going to figure it out without the help of the government. You would say, "Ashton, there's no way that they could hide it." Yeah, there is. Yeah, there is. They have the same funding as all the universities combined. The people building nuclear weapons have laboratories unparalleled.

They can absolutely keep it secret. It was actually probably simple to keep it secret. I'm pretty ashamed that we weren't able to figure it out. And that came to a guy named Ashton Forbes. So, if it upsets you, chat, yeah, upsets me, too. Upsets me more than you.

Honestly, upsets me more than Candace being a sellout. Now, last political thing that I need to mention. I was right about Candace Owens. I'm sorry, guys. I was right about Candace Owens. I've been right about her.

Some of y'all have been pretty upset because you like her. I liked her, too, chat. I went on her show and I thought she was the smartest podcaster in the world. She had me conned, as well. I thought she was smart and I'm not going to lie to you. I sat in the room with Candace Owens and I knew she couldn't understand a single thing that I was saying.

Like, I could tell that she had like some pretty high-level basic questions to ask, but she didn't really know what I was talking about, like at all. And that's fine. I don't care. I did a lot of interviews like that. But this weird schizo thing that she's gone on recently, where she's just making [ __ ] up all the time and doing this mean girls thing where she takes things intentionally out of context and distorts every meaning of everything and claims victory when she hasn't won anything. Like this thing needs a stop I mean she can do what she wants to do.

That's fine, but I told you so. So here she is and this is one of the weirdest turns of all. Oh wait, this isn't the one. Uh crap, that's not the one I wanted. Okay, but this was Oh, did I just like retweet the wrong thing? Okay, still important.

So she lied about getting dismissed from the Macron lawsuit. That was one thing. But the thing that was actually crazy was that she claimed that she never actually wrote any of her opinion pieces for the Daily Wire. Like she claimed that. Where is it? Did she delete it?

No, there's no way, right? Uh yeah, here it is. Okay. Again, I hate hypocrisy. For the record, I never authored even one opinion piece for the Daily Wire. You guys ghost wrote all of them and then slapped my name on it on the author for clips.

What do you mean who's Candace Owens? 7 million followers? I mean let's not pretend like we don't know who Candace Owens is at least. Okay, this isn't a flex. Can you imagine if I was like, "Hey guys, turns out all the content that I've done, I didn't do any of that." I didn't do any of that. I just took the money.

Are you kidding? Why are the debunkers calling me a grifter? This is the ultimate grifter right here. This is the ultimate This is the definition of selling out. That's the definition of selling out. Saying, "Hey, somebody else go write my opinion pieces and then put my name on it.

Don't worry, I don't need to read it. Those are my words you're saying, but I don't need to read it. Just send send me a check." This isn't a flex, man. This is the person who you think I There's people that reply and say, "Candace Owens is running an honest investigation into Charlie Kirk." Are you mentally ill?

This is the person you thinks running an honest investigation into Charlie Kirk? The person that admits that she sold out? And that will just sell her name out for money at any whim? Are you guys crazy? She tried to rehabilitate Harvey Weinstein while he was in prison. He's a convicted sex offender. >> [snorts] >> You don't She >> [laughter] >> He The prosecution came out and said that Harvey Weinstein offered her 1.75 million to try to rehabili- You don't think that's true?

Okay, guys. Anyway. I just point this out because I want to show you what real grifters look like, real con artists, real people that That's the kind of person debunkers try to get you to convince you that I am. But I don't ever do any of those things. I don't ever lie to people like that. I don't ever try to con people or beg people for my to fundraise my frivolous lawsuits.

I don't start crusades up against completely innocent widows for no reason. Invent baseless conspiracies with no evidence. Jeez, man. Okay. Back to the task at hand. Let's talk about MH370.

There's a chance that this could all go belly up. The truth is I've had a few situations in my life if you want to be parasocial where I wondered whether or not I was being conned. And a couple times I did get conned. People love to gloat when I get conned by people, which I think is funny. But a couple times I've not been conned and I still went along with it. And I'd say that those times vastly outweigh the times when I was conned.

Now, as I mentioned, I've got an expert. And yes, I've vetted them. But you can always be tricked. I could be walking into a trap. But it could also just be real. It could actually be someone that wants to help us out.

And I think it is. I think it's a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. So I want to focus on it. So let's look at it like this. I'm not going to be specific, but instead let's play a hypothetical game here. Oh, forgot to mention and answer you guys' question.

Guy that said that you can't afford a super chat, prepper supplies. Don't bother with any prepper supplies. Don't waste your money. No, the Earth is not going to get destroyed by a solar flare or whatever that Ben guy says, the sun weather man. That's all garbage and nonsense. Uh don't worry about any doomer [ __ ] at all, actually.

Just live your life and enjoy every day of your life to its fullest. That's the best you can do on this Earth. And here's the good news is that some form of resurrection or reincarnation is probably true. So I wouldn't worry too much about dying, either. You're probably just going to wake up in a different body somewhere else. That doesn't mean you should probably hurt yourself. I don't think you should do that, either.

Personally, I agree with Christian values that you should not commit any self-harm. And that you'll probably go to hell if you do. So I wouldn't do that, or you might go to alien hell, too, if there's aliens. So you should be scared of that, also. So hopefully that answers your question about prepper supplies. Extremely stupid.

Don't do it. Don't waste your money. And it's depreciable. Like what are you going to do with a whole bunch of food after it goes rotten after 3 years when the world didn't end? Okay. There you go.

Now we handled Okay, back to MH370. Here are the videos. Now, number one, we know what the assets are, okay? I don't want I'm not going to alien hell, I'll tell you that much. I'll tell you that much, I'm not going to alien hell. >> [clears throat] >> Gorgon Stare wide area motion imagery. This is a pretty easy video to confirm.

It's a real surveillance system that has been never before verified by the United States government. What I mean by that is the United States government has made public announcements back in 2014 that the surveillance system was operational, but they've never confirmed any footage of it, ever. So, nobody has any idea what Gorgon Stare footage looks like from the public perspective. We can speculate, but nobody can actually say that they've seen it, and that they can confirm it or not. So, the biggest thing would be if we can confirm this video.

Even though I'd say this is the easier video to fake if someone were to fake the videos, that's pretty obvious. This video is a lot easier to fake, there's not very much movement in the clouds. It's not that complicated of a scene compared to the other video. But, this is the video where the surveillance system is more apparent. Why? Look at the pixel Look at how jittery this video is.

This video is jittery because it's not technically video at all. Video has to be a certain frame rate. Technically, this is wide area motion imagery. Technically, this is a software system that's using photographs from a drone from above. So, first thing we need to realize this is not satellite footage. Yes, the video was called satellite video, it is not a satellite video.

This is a drone video taken from above the airplane. There's an angle to it because the drone is basically just circling above and these photos are being taken and a software system builds a virtual scene. So, the reason why it looks a little bit weird and why the clouds don't have more apparent movement is number one cuz clouds don't move that much, but number two because it's photographs where a computer system is basically making it look like a seamless video. It's a really really really powerful system and that's why it's classified. Does that make sense to you? Technically, it is computer generated actually.

Actually technically technically correct on this one debunkers. It is technically computer generated, but it is also very technically real. Those are real clouds, that was really a plane and those were really orbs were spinning around the plane and it's really being captured in Gorgon Stare. Yeah, and the funny part is like oh, people would be like oh, it's a training. Guys, nobody's doing and using this kind of technology for training or research or a test. People are like oh, why are they testing this on an airplane? Uh guys, come on man.

Please. You guys are a little bit too naive. I need you to come back down to reality with us. The CIA exists. We admit that we run like 15 major operations per year, okay? United States government admits we run like 15 major secret operations.

Actually, let's Google it. How many major secret operations does the CIA run per year? They have like a award ceremony for like who does the best operations. Actually, I don't know if that's true. I'm making that up. I'm literally making that up.

But the exact number of secret major operations is classified and not publicly revealed. Okay, so I can that means I can make up whatever number I want actually. I'm pretty sure though that they did there was some leak though. Wasn't there a leak? Let's see. This is why you don't listen to AI chat.

AI is pretty brutal. Let's see. Watch it's going to be like, "Yeah, you're right, actually. I just didn't tell you that before." You might be thinking of a famous leak. Okay, none of them revealed a fixed account.

Okay. I don't think either of these were the ones I'm looking for. Okay, whatever. Number one, Gorgon Stare video. Number two, Litening G4. Okay, let's at least get these assets right.

I hear people saying that I'm calling them satellite videos. Guys, I haven't called that other video a satellite video for like 2 years, okay? We figured out it was Gorgon Stare like a year and a half after the investigation. Wasn't that You might say, "Oh, you changed your opinion." Dude, the video was called satellite video, and I don't know about secret surveillance or I didn't Now I do. Now I know a lot about secret surveillance, turns out.

So, let's get it right. Satellite video doesn't exist. It's Gorgon Stare whammy, and this one right here is a Litening G4. Litening, L I T Is it pronounced lightning? I'm calling it Litening, even if it's called pronounced lightning. Don't care. Spelled like this.

Learn how to spell, chat. Litening camera. Thermal infrared. One of the details that I think is wild that I don't think any rainbow palette would ever catch is you can see the temperature gradient right on the hull of the plane and on the wing. And what I mean by that is you see a little light blue strip. Why?

Because that's the real temperature gradient from the actual skin of the craft interacting with the air. A little very, very thin thing. And this heat signature right here, nobody in a million years would have ever faked. That's a real drone that you're looking at, and it's an MQ-9 Reaper. You can see the MQ-9 Reaper. You can literally take a a model of an MQ-9 Reaper, and you can put it over the screen, and it's a 100% perfect match.

Now, the bunkers would claim, "Well, that that means it's just a model." The [ __ ] Models are models of real crafts. So, it's a real MQ-9 Reaper with a real heat signature, and that's exactly where the top of the the nose opens up, right there where you see that line. It's exactly where it opens up in the real world. This location of the camera, you may say, "This camera is in the wrong spot. You say the camera is underneath the nose of the drone."

Yeah, this is not the normal camera. You're not looking at the normal camera. We've seen the MTS, they call it, multi-targeting cam spectral camera, whatever they call it. This is not that camera. This is a custom loadout. This slot is called hard point number five, I believe.

There's like seven hard points, nine hard points. You can put anything underneath these. You can put missiles under them, whatever. They put a camera under here. They put a camera under M hard point number five, and it's a Litening G4 pod. Now, the weirdest part about this, I'm going to point this out, too.

There's nobody could ever fake this video. Not in a million years, not with your life on the line, not if you're the number one VFX expert in the world. You cannot fake this video. There's just There's too many things you'd have no idea what it should look like. No idea. Even if you could somehow fake the actual technical components, which you still couldn't do, you could never fake the real movement of the Boeing 777, which by the way, that's a real Boeing 777 obeying real physics in real time.

So, one of the details I'm going to point out here, if we could hypothetically get ideal experts, one expert would be a pilot. We would want a pilot, ideally a Boeing 777 pilot, who can say, "Hey, yeah, I've flown 10,000 hours, and I can tell you that that plane That's a real plane." You can recognize you've flown 10,000 hours in this plane, you're going to know the capabilities of the plane, its turning capabilities. You're going to even be able to see it. And what am I telling you right now? I'm telling you that's a real plane you're looking at turning.

So, I need to take some notes here, chat. >> [clears throat] >> Gorgon Stare number one. Number two, Litening G4. We need some confirmation on the Litening G4. Number three, MQ-9 Reapers. They're both MQ-9 Reapers presumably. Now, I haven't seen the Gorgon Stare drone, but it's They're all MQ-9 Reapers for that one.

Number four, Boeing 777 flight characteristics. Okay, if this video's fake, then those are not real flight characteristics that we're looking at in a video right here, right? If this is a model, then this is If this is a model, then we're looking at What is it? A jitter overlay? They just make [ __ ] up, chat. They'll be like, "Oh, that's a jitter plugin."

The reason why the camera's shaking is because it's a jitter plugin. It's not because it's a real camera that's zoomed in. Okay, it's a real camera zooming in right here. You can see the shaking of the camera. You can see the real camera shaking harder when it zooms in because it's real. That's not a plug-in.

That's called a real camera you're watching. You guys [ __ ] Sorry, there's going to be a lot of [ __ ] references. If this hurts your feelings, I apologize. I've just lost all patience. Okay. So, flight characteristics.

Um camera operation. Now, one thing that you just saw right here is the camera goes off the screen. How are they tracking the plane and then zooming in? Camera's off the screen right here. How are they How are they zooming in on the plane if they can't see it? You can't see the plane and you're zooming in on something you can't see right here.

If I was a debunker, which I am not, this is what I would be harping on. I'd be like, "Hey, look at they messed this up. The plane should be in view here." But what happened there was somebody was zooming in cuz they were looking at another video. They had a second screen and they could still see the the plane in the larger context. So, they were able to zoom in on the other camera and then the plane is zoomed in when we next see it.

Let me go back and show you. Look how tiny it is. This means they've zoomed in and look how much more detail you can see. All of a sudden, look it. We can't see any detail here. And now, look at all this detail right here.

Holy [ __ ] If you think this is fake, you need to check yourself into an insane asylum. If you can look at what I'm looking at right now on the screen and tell me you think someone faked this, including the literal plasma orb with the heat signature inside of it, then you don't deserve to breathe oxygen on this Earth. You're looking at a 100% real Boeing 777. It's not any Boeing 777. It's exactly Malaysian Airlines flight 370. Look at how the bottom half of the hull is darker than the top half.

The paint changes right there. The paint on the Boeing 777, the bottom half is darker, right? Hold on. Better be making sure I'm right. Oh, yes, it is. Yes, it is, chat.

The paint on the bottom half is gray. The paint on the top half of the plane is white. Why does it look like it's darker exactly at the middle? Because the paint changes the reflection of the way the reflection of the camera. How can you got not tell them that's literally MH370? The paint matches the real plane.

If that's not enough for you, you can see door right there. There's the door right in the front. With the heat signature that's different, you can see the air conditioning manifolds. There's exactly six of them. And then you can also see the back door as well. You say, "Oh, what about this weird heat signature?"

That's smoke coming out of the air conditioning underneath the plane. That's not coming from the engines. Which by the way means this is a three-dimensional thing going on here. This is not a 2D graphical representation. This is just a 2D video of a 3D event. Wow.

Now, let me make a couple notes of what I just said down there. The Boeing 777 engineering specifics. Which is the AC exhaust ports underneath, right? In theory, a pilot would know that yes, we're looking at smoke If some If a pilot tells me that yes, we're looking at smoke coming out of the AC exhaust ports right here. GG I win. GG I win.

If these videos are accurately showing smoke coming out of the AC exhaust units and I was able to confirm that just from looking at the videos with no expertise whatsoever into any of these things, there's absolutely no way somebody could have faked that. That proves the videos are real on their own. Now, I'm going to give you a lot more than that, but I'm just going to start laying it out. So, the AC exhaust, the uh the AC the uh what do they call them? The manifolds, AC distribution manifolds? Where the air gets circulated around through the plane.

That's what those blobs are, those white yellow blobs. The doors, etc. You can get models of airplanes. There are no models of any Boeing 777s that are going to show you the thermal gradient, especially with the paint included. The paint is specific to the brand and the aircraft and the airline. So, these are just some examples of how these videos are 100% real. You know what?

I want to change gears and I want to show you the debunker real quick or debunks. Cuz I want to show you how they were faking this. Turns out randomly, the person that posted the main debunk that got the entire videos banned from Reddit decided to come back out of hiding after years. IC Slide, which quite literally means intelligence community forum slide. IC Slide. They made the actual account name a literal social media manipulation name.

That's how brazen they are. This is a fake account Everybody agrees this is a fake burner account that was solely made to push this debunk. Nobody disagrees with that. They just claim it doesn't matter. They just claim it doesn't matter that it was a total burner account that claims to have found an obscure debunk that doesn't actually match, but they presented they pretended like it did. Now, I look at how try-hard and fake this is.

I want to read this whole thing for you. Now that I've shown you that's a real plane, that's real the real paint on really MH370. This is how lazy these people are about their disinformation. Nothing about this post is organic. They originally posted this this wasn't organic at all. They duped thousands of people with this and it's just not even like look at listen for any substance here.

Does this story even make sense? They're over explaining and they try to rationalize how they found it. Nobody's even asking how you found it and then suddenly you're over explaining how you found it because no your whole story doesn't even make sense cuz you're not even a real account. You have a whole fake story for how you found this VFX. Why do you have a fake story for how you found this? The plane video has VFX elements used for the portal and is likely a hoax.

That's how they start. They start off right away with a lie. They start off claiming a fact that's not true. There's no VFX in the videos. I'll prove it to you guys right now. Right now.

This is how easy it is to prove. I took their exact stock effect. All I did was take the exact stock effect and I compared it directly the exact frame that they're comparing directly overlay. That's it. No extra no nothing else to it. That's it right here.

Boom. There it is. There's their effect right here. >> [clears throat] >> That's the that's the real video. Right there. You can see the plane sticking out. And here's their effect.

So, they found two shapes that are the same, but once you look at the middle, you can see it's not even remotely close. The blob is completely different in the middle. There's no editing that to get it to look the same. It is what it is. They found one edge, and this is why when debunkers show it to you, you'll you'll never see this comparison. They will never ever ever show you this comparison.

This is the most honest comparison that there is, a direct overlay of the of the frames. And nobody has ever shown this to you except for Ashton Forbes, because it proves them all wrong. Simple as that. They only show you one part of that edge on the right, where one dot is in a similar spot. They go, "Oh, look. Look at this edge in the corner.

Th- There's no way that this this dot could exist on two different blasts." Okay. Whatever, buddy. Okay. If that's not enough for you, they also [clears throat] claimed that that's not it. They claimed there's more matching effects.

Now, I'm going to show you a complete and total fabrication. They claimed that the Gorgon Stare Whammy Zap also matches the exact same stock effect. The exact same one. So, I went ahead and I took an I downloaded the stock effect, which I'll play right now. I took the exact frame and I compared it exactly side by side. Oh, I can't I can't share the fr- Hold on.

Maybe I'll do it this way. W- Would it work if I share it through this? Yeah, hold on. There we go. So, here we go. I actually like addressing the debunks, by the way.

So, here's the actual stock effect. I'll play the whole thing. This is the actual original '90s. This is a stock effect from the '90s, guys. So, it's low quality. That's why it's low quality.

It's a '90s stock effect. You say, "Okay, well, you're telling me one of these frames is the zap in the Gorgon stare whammy?" Definitely not true. So, which frame is it? This frame. >> [snorts] >> They claim this frame is the zap in the Gorgon stare whammy. Okay, well, let's just do a side-by-side comparison.

Side-by-side comparison. I already did it. Posted [clears throat] it on my Twitter earlier. You can take a look for yourself. You can fact-check me, double-check it here for yourself. You will find that the comparison is exactly 100% honest, no dishonesty whatsoever, just exact screenshots of the two of the two images, and there they are.

There they are. I'll zoom it in. Can I zoom it in? Yep. >> [sighs] >> That's what they're claiming are exactly the same. They're claiming that those two are exactly the same. It's pretty obviously not true.

You just looking at it, you can see just for an example, just one example, you can see this direct straight line on the right just doesn't exist in this. There's kind of like a spotchy thing going in that area, but definitely not a match. So, before you cared all about the dots being lined up, now there's no dots lined up anymore. And yes, those things coming off the zap in the MH370 video are part of the zap. Mhm.

So, what they did was they somehow just converted this blob into that other blob, they didn't show you any of them doing it, and then just that's the how the deception works. They don't actually show you them doing it, they just convert it, and then they say, "Oh, this is what it is." And then you look at the original, you say, "No, it's not." That's a literal complete and total fabrication. You'd a complete and total fabrication. Incredible.

Good work. Now, the reason why I bring that up, I'm going back to my rant from before I got cut off at the beginning of the live stream. Not going to harp on it too much, I'm just going to say this. I'm going to repeat myself a little bit. The people that have been trying to attack me, debunking these videos and what have you, they have not for one second and probably never in their lives ever considered that they were wrong.

They have always assumed that they're right about everything and that they just go on Google, they'll find the truth and they can go around correcting and harassing people. That's how they've lived their lives, 100%. And that's fine as long as you're willing to accept the consequences of that lifestyle. I am going to be the literal boogeyman for debunkers. I'm going to be the guy that ended up being right that proves that they're all frauds. That proves that none of them are actually out there trying to debunk anything in good faith.

As long as the debunkers are willing to say, "You know what? If it turns out that you're right, then I deserve to be treated the way that I was treating you for the rest of my life." As long as they're willing to say, "Yes, they deserve that." And if that ends up being the case, then I have no problem with them whatsoever. The problem is they're not going to do that. The problem is what's going to happen is I'm going to be proven right and they're going to still be living in denial.

I'm going to be proven right, they're going to still be living in denial and yet worse, they're going to pretend to be victims. You see it all the time. They're going to pretend to be victims and say, "Ashton is actually so mean, so it doesn't actually matter that he was right at all." I don't want to hear any excuses.

You can be as ignorant and as stupid as you want, you can be as big a piece of [ __ ] as you want, but just realize if you're the one that was helping cover up what happened to 239 people by lying and making fake comparisons and peddling them as true on the internet, your life is over. Whatever your little pathetic life you thought you had, that [ __ ] is over. And make it 100% clear, you're not safe because you think you're anonymous on the internet. We know exactly who you are. You aren't safe. Your proxies and your VPNs aren't going to protect you.

Nothing is going to protect you. I need to keep saying this cuz people keep thinking I'm messing around. I am not. I've been extremely clear about exactly what I'm going to do, exactly what's true and what's not. And the people that have been trying to distort that and lie, you are screwed. So, think very, very carefully about how you act and how you want to proceed.

Because exactly what you say about me grifting and hurting the families, that's actually you. That's actually you. So, however you think I should be treated, just be prepared, that's how you are going to be treated. So, you better start treating me with respect. Cuz otherwise, your life is going to be a [ __ ] miserable, man. I'm going to make personally sure of it.

Okay. Let's get back to the task at hand. Recap. We have experts ready to go on the record. Not going to dig more into it, but yeah. Experts ready to go on the record.

We're hypothetically thinking about what questions we need to ask to really drive home that the videos are real. Cuz I'm not going to hear any more [ __ ] about I'm a VFX expert on the internet. Uh no, you aren't. For the record, none of the Redditors pretending to be VFX experts, not a single one of them is actually a VFX expert. Not one. Not even one.

None of them are. They're all liars. They're all frauds. Don't ever go to Reddit for expertise. It's just a bunch of retards larping playing pretend. >> [clears throat] >> We've already talked about the flight characteristics. The camera surveillance systems. What about the actual events?

This is a pretty good one, but I don't know if this is new useful for necessarily the podcast. I have this clip ready to go though. Part of the problem here is that the guy that made this claim, I don't trust him at all anymore. He made up some [ __ ] about me later on. And so, he could have just been making this [ __ ] up about knowing Jeffrey Ford. But, I'll play it for you guys. Uh Here you go. >> I talked to the Marvel Studios lead VFX guy, Jeffrey Ford, if anyone wants to look him up.

I sent him the videos via text, and I told you how long I asked him how long it would take for him to make it, and he said that first off, if he had to make it, uh uh or or the first thing he asked me was, "These would be extremely extremely really good like professional fakes if they're faked at all." And second all, second of all, he said it would take him a minimum a minimum of if you're doing two different perspectives, you're essentially creating three videos.

You'd have to be able to do on research on the satellite, um you know, where everything is to make sure that it lines up properly, um so that it can't be uh, poked holes in. The the minimum amount of time would be uh, about a, you know, like 6 months. I think I think he said. So, >> So, that is uh, I forget his real name. Total Disclosure Disclosure Pod or something like that. Anyway, I don't trust this guy at all.

He's really weird. He made up lies about He might have lied about Avi Loeb. I can't tell. He definitely lied about me, something about Ross Coulthart, just made up a fake story, pretend like he was there. This guy actually pretended like he was there at Contact in the Desert and said I got in a fight with Ross Coulthart. He wasn't even there.

Dude literally wasn't even there. No fight ever happened. I mean, it was kind of a I had a kind of a confrontation, but he claimed that I like attacked and and fought Ross Coulthart. So, if you're going to go and lie like that, then I can't trust anything you said. So, I can't even really trust this story anymore, but he did claim that Jeffrey Ford, you know, said that. So.

Okay, here's some other things. So, I don't think I'm going to bring that up. But that is interesting. There was also a Reddit post, if you're curious, that claimed to be by one of the major uh, editors for Top Gun Maverick. Now, why was this important? Because Top Gun Maverick is an entire movie about military jets.

Tom Cruise is in it. You may have heard of it, Top Gun. Top Gun Maverick, the sequel. And they were pointing out how difficult it is to accurately portray flight characteristics from a camera that supposedly is in the sky. Very difficult. So, actually one of the most difficult aspects of the videos is trying to get the real flight characteristics of the Boeing 777. That's one thing I wanted to point out.

Okay, I found I was writing down a few more details. I don't see you guys post helping me out here in the chat very well. Focus, everybody. Some of you probably took too many Mary Jane Hoochies. Okay. Satellite images.

Remember? The Chinese satellite images. Do I have a screenshot? I think I might. Let me see. Um No, I don't.

Okay. China revealed some satellite imagery. And they claimed it was uh some kind of wreckage in the ocean. Well, nobody actually really claimed this. That's what's weird about it. I'm going to pull them up here.

So, I think we're going to ask about this. Because if this is true and this image right here is actually of the operation of MH370, then I'd be very curious what a third-party person thinks about this. Because from my perspective and really only my and our perspective, this is an intelligence community message. This is China's intelligence community telling the United States that they know what we did. That's what this is. The only people that understand this message is our intelligence community.

Everybody else just looks at this and goes, "What is this? I What? Debris in the ocean? Doesn't look like debris in the ocean to me." But if you are the ones that sent three orbs around the plane, you know what you're looking at in this. This is them saying, "We know what you did, but we're not going to say."

Okay? Is that clear? That's what this is, 100%. I'm sure of it. So, this is a good litmus test for any supposed whistleblower or somebody that wants to talk about or even really any investigator. What do you think Why do you think China released this photo?

It had to be a controlled release. Satellite photos just don't get randomly leaked on the internet. Another one. The missing radar data. Um this one I think I have to pull up on my Discord. By the way, I've only mentioned this like once.

I have a secret backup Discord that has all my [ __ ] in it. It's not really necessary anymore because we have the main Discord that has everything, but I've had a secret Discord this whole time. It actually doesn't have anybody else in it. It's just me. So, don't worry about secret coordination or anything like that. There's nobody else.

I would not I wouldn't trust literally anybody in my Discord. It's just me with all research and notes and things like that. So, it's nothing special, but one day maybe it will be in the Smithsonian chat. One day my secret Discord will be in the Smithsonian because it will have all the content you want. Okay, where is it? Um looking for Oh, here we go.

No, that's not it. Radars, radars, radars. Okay, here's the flight path. So, the flight path might just be another thing that we should ask about. Because a simple timeline of the flight path is really significant. What I'm probably going to do is just superimpose a bunch of clips and images after we record.

But if you look at this, I mean, that's it. That's it right there. This is the whole story of MH370 up until teleportation. Teleportation is happening right over here in the top left. Plane is taking off down there in the bottom. And there's Katherine Tee.

So, we should probably ask about the witness sightings, right? We asked about the radar images. What about the witness sightings? Witness sighting, that person had to have seen the plane. Like that Look at how close the plane is to that person. You tell me there was a plane potentially on fire with orange orange haze all around it.

Of course you can it's going to stick out like a sore thumb even in the middle of the night. >> [snorts] >> So, there's your flight path. In addition to this, the radar data. Dude, the radar data. Where's my radar data image, chat? Oh, the debris. Holy [ __ ] the debris.

This is why we're going to have to have another live stream where I just go over the stuff, chat. I'm going to If I don't go over this like four times, I'm going to forget something. Oh, here you go, this too. How's that? Oh, hold on. Let me Let me switch to this share window. >> [clears throat] >> The Lighedo Hotel radar data.

This is not the radar data I was looking for, but I wanted to show you this first. Look Look closely, chat. Chat, if you see my Fortunes Weaves bookmarks up here? Just wait for the un- Wait for the unveiling, chat. Just wait. You're going to have to wait a while, but anyway. Focus on this though.

Satellite video coordinates. Notice I call it satellite video? I actually made this image before we even found out it was Gorgon Stare. That's not me trolling you, I just this image is that old. It actually predates the Gorgon Stare. Look at the actual predicted flight path of the plane, and look at how close it is to the coordinates of the video.

Are you guys kidding me right now? There's coordinates in the video. You know what? I should have brought this up. Gorgon Stare coordinates video. There's literal coordinates that perfectly coincide with the flight path of the plane.

How are people saying the videos are fake? My favorite are the people are like, "How do you know Why do you think it's MH370? I can see the paint job on it." The coordinates are exactly where the plane is. Are you kidding me? What do you mean?

Now, how do you think it's not MH370? What plane do you think it is that we're looking at? Crazy, man. Um but let's look at the radar data. So, focus on this for a second. Sca- stare at it.

Stare at it. Yo, what's up, Chance? This is you, Chance. I don't know who you are, but I'm just pretending. Okay, radar data. I swear I'm getting close to the radar data images, chat. >> [clears throat] >> There it is.

Found it. Prepare yourself. Okay, have you memorized the image? Here it goes. Whoop. Boom.

Um that's a lot of radars. So, if you're confused, that line that we just saw goes through all these radars right here. Goes through all of them. Every single one of them. You're telling me there's no radars of the plane over there. That suddenly So, I'm just going to be honest. Where's all this radar data?

If I'm right and that plane's getting teleported in the Nicobar Islands, there's radar data where a plane suddenly blips off of radar. Because it's in range of those radars where that plane's being teleported. Is this This isn't hard. Do I need to draw this in crayon for people, or can you guys understand what I'm saying here? There's like 50 radars in range when this plane's being teleported, and nobody's ever revealed the radar data. Does that not seem weird to you guys?

So, if I'm right and I have no way I could possibly know this unless I'm from the future. If I'm right, there's radar data that's being held back, and the reason it's being held back is because a plane suddenly blips off of radar, but there's no crash. So, think about this. I'm telling you something that I can't possibly know right now. Okay, I can't possibly know this if this is true. That that plane was flying because we're watching it in videos, and it's being warped away.

We can see the coordinates. And there's multiple radars in range. That radar, if they're looking at that plane in that moment, is going to vanish off of radar. And they're all going to think the exact same thing. What are they going to think when they see the plane vanish off of radar? They're going to say that it just crashed.

They're going to say that the plane must have crashed. It blipped off of radar roughly around 18:40 18:42 UTC. Do you want to see something crazy? If I'm right, that plane blipped off of radar somewhere around 18:40 18:42 UTC, which is the exact time the plane would be at those coordinates. What time do you think, on the day the plane disappeared, would you believe me if I told you that they said the plane blipped out and disappeared at 18:40 UTC? Would you believe me if I said that?

I just reverse engineered based on the plane, based on the sat based on the coordinates, and a direct shot from that last known location, that that plane's being blipped off of radar at roughly 18:42 UTC. At 18:40 UTC, a critical anomaly occurred regarding the tracking and communication narrative of MH370. The 18:40 Inmarsat discrepancy. UTC marked the definitive point where the corridor was mathematically ruled out. That's not even what I'm looking at. Subang air traffic control handled the flight departure.

Subang handed it off to Ho Chi Minh. There's literally the Why come this doesn't have it on here? There's actually a thing saying that Subang air traffic control lost contact with MH370 at 18:40. Poor AI. So stupid. I'm too lazy to I have it actually in my Discord.

I'm just too lazy to dig through it. Here it is right here. Official post statement. Right there. Right there, chat. You can't make this up.

AI didn't even tell me right away. I had to force the AI to tell me the truth. Official press statement. Sepang, 8 March 2014. Malaysian Airlines This is the morning after the plane disappeared. The very first announcement.

Malaysia Airlines confirms that MH370 has lost contact with Subang air traffic control at 2:40 a.m. Which is exactly 18:40 UTC. Exact same moment that the plane is being teleported out of the sky on video. Now, why do you think they didn't reveal the radar data, chat? I'm going to tell you exactly why they didn't reveal it. Cuz the radar data shows that plane disappearing at the exact coordinates in the video at exactly 18:40 UTC. That's what the radar data shows.

And they never revealed it because if they revealed it, people would wonder how the hell that can be true. People would say, "Well, why didn't we find the plane there?" Why Why is there no crash plane in the ocean in the in the Nicobar Islands? Oh, because we teleported it out of the damn sky with some orbs. Like we see in two military videos from two completely different angles. Like that one is a different side of the plane than the other.

People are like, "Oh, they just did some 2D Adobe shit." No, they didn't, dude. You can't make those videos in 2D or 2.5D or whatever [ __ ] you're talking about. That's a real three-dimensional event happened in real life. >> [clears throat] >> So, I'm going to actually bring this up. With respect to the missing radar, Subang ATC 18:40 lost contact. I mean, that's just That's damning to me.

If Candace Owens had some [ __ ] where it like perfect they perfectly made an announcement that matches up with two videos, she'd be the most credible investigator on Earth. Most credible investigator Guys, look at it again. You can't make this up. The exact moment they're teleporting the plane out of the sky is the exact same time the very first press announcement said that they the plane they lost contact with the plane. And then they changed it later on. They literally changed it after this.

They said, "No, we're we're just kidding." What do you mean? You said you confirmed it. It's not like this would happen like immediately when the plane disappeared. This was hours later. This was hours later they make this press uh statement.

What information were they working off of that they said the plane lost contact at 18:40 if that's not true? I'll tell you what happened. They started the cover-up. They started the cover-up. They started changing around the details in the evidence cuz they needed to change what happened. And so mysteriously, miraculously, they decided that oh, uh this is the part where the plane like flew to the South Indian Ocean.

The plane turned and flew to the South Indian Ocean. So, we better ask about the Inmarsat pings. Cuz those are obviously fake. We then we go, "Okay, well, your Inmarsat pings say this They say, "Hey, we found some Inmarsat pings." Everybody's wondering about where the radar data is. They go, "We found some Inmarsat pings."

Turns out the plane didn't blip off of radar. It It went into the South Indian Ocean. These radar pings prove it. We go, "Okay, that's awesome." Let's go search. We go search and we search and we search for 12 years, including last summer.

This last summer they were searching. 12 years they search exactly where the radar ping the the satellite pings say the plane should be. And they found nothing. Not even one piece of the plane. They never found anything. So, we need to ask about that.

Now, possibly the last piece then, but they did find something. They found debris. Uh yeah, we're going to have to talk ask about that, too. I see your guys' chats. Cell phones, okay. They found some debris.

Well, we need to ask about the debris because contrary to what people say about my claims, I do believe that's from MH370. Ashton, how can you believe that the debris is real and that they teleported a plane? I don't know. Where do you think there's a discrepancy? Where is there a discrepancy between teleporting a plane and then the plane crashing? Teleportation is moving an object from one location to the other.

It doesn't rule out a plane crash. Teleportation doesn't mean that the plane went to the bizarro dimension and is hanging out there. Maybe you need to learn physics. Teleportation just means the plane was moved from one location to another. And in fact, the debris doesn't make any sense with respect to the search zone. The debris is thousands of miles from the search zone.

There's no way that it randomly was washing through the ocean and all washed ashore in Australia or in Africa when you're telling me the plane crashed near Australia. Basic geography, basically just looking at the direction of the ocean currents will tell you that the story that we're being told doesn't doesn't add up. It doesn't require any PhDs. You can just literally look at how far away Africa is from the search zone and go, "That doesn't make any sense, dude." Then on top of that, you can say, "Well, also, the currents are also going the wrong way."

The currents are going this way, this way, not this way. So, what's the answer? It's actually pretty simple. The plane got teleported closer to Africa. Wow. Wow, guys.

I know it's hard. It's hard to understand. I'm going to I'm going to get that crayon drawing for you. Here you go. I actually drew one for you. Here you go.

Crayon drawing. Fun story. This is actually not even my image. A guy named Martin made this before he crashed out. So many crash outs, honestly. Arwen was is one I feel bad for.

It sucks. Imagine being somebody that was on board with this and then you get sci-op'd by the debunkers and then you start becoming a debunker and saying that it's not real anymore. You could have been famous. You could have had everything but you didn't have the conviction to go along with it. You're You're too weak-willed. And that's why you'll get no credit whatsoever when it turns out the videos are real.

You should have got You should not have given up. Shouldn't have given up, boss. Anyway, there you go. Look at that. Very, very simple. You guys understand drawing?

So, top right, that's where they're teleporting the plane in the top right. You can even see the witness who saw the plane in that location. You can see how they're teleporting the plane to the left over here, to the west. And then somewhere along this corridor maybe it probably was right up here near the Maldives if I had to guess. The plane is in the water. Right there. You say, "Where is the plane?"

It's right here in the water somewhere. Right there. And you say, "Oh, well, that's how the debris got to Africa because this is like way closer to Africa than way the hell down here somewhere." Way closer to Africa. Now, the reason why it's not at Diego Garcia, some people might say, "Ashton, you're a sci-op now. You're not saying it went to Diego Garcia."

I was always keeping it open-ended. I could never really rationalize how a huge plane, look how big this plane is. If you were an ant, you could fit a lot of ants in this plane. It makes way more sense to ditch the plane in the ocean somewhere. Way more sense. Which means they killed all those people.

Which is horrific. They did. They killed all those people for sure. The other problem is if you look at the map of the boats of the ocean traffic there is ocean traffic all over there. There is ocean traffic There's By the way, there's no way the plane crashed in the South Indian Ocean without somebody seeing the debris. There's ocean traffic all over.

I just looked at a real-time thing, and there's another boat every 50 miles or less. There's boats everywhere. Now, are they all going to report a sighting or see something? No, but the more boats there are, the more likely you're going to get seen. That means this plane can't just be flying around everywhere. It's being going to be seen by people all over the place, just like how Katherine T saw it.

So, they have to ditch this plane quickly. They got to ditch this plane, and they got to ditch it somewhere where nobody sees it. So, essentially, what I imagine they would have done is they would have used their Gorgon Stare to look at all the areas of the boats, and they'd be like, "Oh, there's no boat here. There's a dead zone here where there's only like one boat over here. They're not going to see you." And then just ditch the plane over there.

Now, it had to be a controlled controlled ditching. Why? Because if you just take the plane and go then that plane's going to explode, and debris's going to fly everywhere. The only way they could have covered this up is if they do a controlled ditching and let the plane sink, and they sink it somewhere where nobody's going to look. That's how it had to go down. So, what that tells me is when we find the plane, it's going to be in like a couple huge chunks.

It's probably It could have broken in half or whatever, but it's not going to be in a thousand pieces. It's going to be in a couple chunks and a huge debris field around it on in the water. And there was probably a lot more debris that washed ashore, and we just didn't notice because it washed ashore much earlier than we suspected and in locations we weren't looking. Debris was washing ashore in Africa probably before they found it, and they just weren't looking. So, there you go. Okay.

Couple other points. So, we want to ask about the debris, opinions, expert opinions on the debris and the range of the debris. The cell phones. There's an actual video of the cell phones still working. Looking to see if I have it. I haven't played this clip in a long time.

Uh hmm. I guess I don't have the clip handy. There's an actual video of one of the family members straight up just calling one of their loved ones and it's ringing. So there was this big argument whether or not phones ring when they're off. And the answer is they don't. There's no debate.

They don't ring. Phones do not ring if the phone is off. There's nothing to connect to, it doesn't ring. People will be like, oh, they sometimes they put in fake rings. No, they don't. They don't do that.

I don't know. It's so weird. People just lie about [ __ ] that you can just verify for yourself. This is why when people make brazen lies I When people are to argue in this I'll say, okay, turn your phone off right now and I'll call it. I guarantee you it will not ring. And they'll be like, but they'll be like, oh, but that doesn't count.

You're like, what the [ __ ] you talking about, man? You can't just be like, hey, they add a fake ringtone when your phone's off and then I say, no, they don't and prove you wrong and then you'll be like, oh, yes, I I'm not wrong. Jesus, man. But that being said, what does it mean? I don't know. >> [snorts] >> What does it mean? It's not conclusive either way.

It doesn't mean those people are on Diego Garcia living out their best lives. Maybe the phone fell out of the plane and landed on an island somewhere. We You might say that's crazy. Well, there's a fire suppression device that washed up in the Maldives. That's another thing I got to look at. Fire suppression.

Glad I'm talking through this. A Boeing 777 fire suppression device washes up in the Maldives on April 25th. Or no, March 25th. So something fell out of the plane. How? Great question.

The so the cell phone data, we can ask about that. Maybe there's more information about the cell phone data cuz the thing that I always wondered about if there's cell phone data, then there should be some records tracking. We should be able to see when the cell phones lost service. Maybe one person was somehow connected on their phone. It's worth checking out. The 9/11 the people that fought back on 9/11, they made three phone calls.

They were on an airplane, they were making phone calls. So it's not impossible, depending on the altitude, to make a phone call. So where's the cell phone data? Now, one of the last things, and I know I already said this, but we keep coming up with more. The sonar data. Where Where the hell is this acoustic data?

The United States government the Navy heard the plane hit the ocean. How do I know that? Because I know that we have surveillance systems like SOSUS that can detect every single submarine in the ocean. And that's an antiquated obsolete system. Our classified military systems can detect a Boeing 777 crashing into the ocean. If you don't believe that, then you're woefully naive.

Okay? I don't know what What kind of technology do you think we have in our military? We aren't running dial-up, okay? So why is the United States government not telling us where the plane is? They know exactly where it is. Even if they weren't involved, I mean they were, but let's just imagine, let's give them the benefit of the doubt and claim they weren't involved.

Where is the plane? They know exactly where it is, and all they have to do is tell us where it is. At any point, the media should just be simply asking the United States military and the Department of War, "Where is MH370?" You don't even need to ask about the videos. Just ask where the plane is because they know where it is exactly. And I guarantee if you start snooping around where the plane is on the bottom of the ocean, you're going to be met with a lot of military boats around you very, very, very quickly.

Very quickly. I guarantee you wherever that plane is at the bottom of the ocean, they are being very careful that nobody goes looking over there. Nobody goes looking over there find that plane. In fact, if it's really bad, then I would be working on a mechanism I wish to remove the debris from the bottom of the ocean. They might even be doing that or have done that. Yeah.

Cuz they might be actually be cooked to a degree where they've got to like actually go cover this up now. Okay, so the Maldives and the fire suppression device. This might be the last thing. Now that we know they've teleported a plane, we A, I want to tell you this. This expert or these experts are not going to be physics experts. I do those interviews already.

That's not the point of this Let's call it I'm not going to call it whistleblower. Let's call it this collector of information this interview that I'm doing. This purpose is to prove the actual conspiracy of the plane and what the United States did, surveillance systems, the actual uh story of what happened to that plane that night. This is not to prove that the United States has fusion teleportation orbs or even the teleportation is real. That's not going to be the point of this. If you want that, then you should just watch my Salvatore Pais interviews.

It's right there. Everything you could possibly want is right there in the Salvatore Pais interviews. >> [sighs and gasps] >> Neutrino detector, I don't think we're going to dig too much into that, but I did think it was interesting and there's some news story coming about the neutrino detector recently. Um >> [clears throat] >> Oh, crap chat. I was going to read this whole thing here. So, this is what happens when I get sidetracked. Going back to this debunk that I just totally got sidetracked from reading.

I wanted to read this. Cuz this person just reposted the original debunk word for word from years ago. They're obviously trolling. Like this is literally trolling. And if you go through this, what's funny is they deleted a whole bunch of replies. I think they did.

No, maybe they didn't. Oh, no, they did. There was a big back and forth between this guy. Maybe this is it right here. About whether or not this guy was Mick West. So, I'm not sure if they deleted, but look at this. Stock VFX confirmed my post was auto moderated and I have no other way to share this.

The portal effect in IR uses VFX from the '90s. Look at this. They were quite literally spamming this trying to get attention to their fake debunk. Look at this. Have you ever seen a more obvious psyop than this? Do you think this is If you think this is an organic person, you are so stupid. >> [gasps] >> You are so stupid.

By the way, I love exposing this and that they're so brazen that they think that they can just get away with this is absolutely incredible. And just to show you, this that's all their post history ever going back three years. This is their first ever post. This was a one-day-old account when they made this post. I You can see this is the original post on the Reddit that was used to debunk the videos, right here. This is the original thread. 4,000 upvotes, three 2.3 thousand comments. Bionical game.

These people are talking about 90s video game graphics. And this, meanwhile the creator of the hoax video is eating their popcorn. There is literally no hoaxer. You guys are under some delusion that somebody was out here that they found a stock effect and decided they were going to change each individual frame of the stock effect and start editing them to make various blobs. That never happened. Nobody ever did that.

That story never happened in real life. There is no hoaxer of the videos. No one ever made blobs from a stock effect. None of that [ __ ] ever happened. That's all just mentally ill [ __ ] you made up in your head. My god.

Okay, I just want to read this part though. Let me describe my process for how I found this stock effect that doesn't even match that you have to edit to try to make match. This right here is the This person is literally claiming that this matches this. This is their whole claim. I just showed you they don't match. All I did was just do an overlay of these two frames, that one and this one right here.

And then you can show people this and the craziest part is they'll go, "Of course it doesn't match." What do you mean of course it doesn't match? What? Not only does one the single frame that guy is claiming matches, that doesn't match. Here it is. Even if you try to edit it, why isn't it popping up?

Even if you try to edit it to try to get it to match as best as possible, it still doesn't match. This is a direct overlay. Oops. So, whatever that person's making is objectively not true. And they were spamming that they found a perfect match. This is not a match, dude.

You found two shapes that are vaguely similar and then you made a false lie that they were the same thing. Again, all you have to do is just overlay one or the other. It doesn't take any complicated editing. Doesn't require any VFX skills. This is Nobody did this. Nobody converted that into that.

Nobody did that. Never happened. That's not an opinion. This is just a fact. Okay, so back to this thing. Let's read their fake story.

So, this is a fake story. So, this person isn't real. This is like just some psyop, some troll or something. Maybe intelligence community. I saw the plane video here on Reddit. I've been following the development.

It seemed convincing and attempts to debunk it seemed to fail. When viewing it myself, the portal stuck out to me as fake yet familiar-looking. Oh, the portal looked familiar. Where did you see it? I played Duke Nukem 3D in the '90s. Okay, this is a 100% fake story.

I played Duke Nukem in the '90s. I'm an actual real video gamer that really played Duke Nukem in the '90s and there's nothing in the videos that looks anything like Duke Nukem. There's absolutely nothing in the videos that looks anything like Duke Nukem or even makes you think of Duke Nukem. This is a 100% completely made-up story. This is a completely whole cloth made-up These people make up the dumbest fakest stories for how they make up their fake debunks. They're quite literally mentally ill, too.

And you say, "Ashton, no, no. They're not making up a fake story." Yes, they are. These people are literally psychotic. They're mentally ill schizos and they make up whole stories all the time. There's an enemy in Duke Nukem called the Octobrain. It had a projectile attract that uses a sprite that looks very similar.

You think that some guy was like, "Oh, bro, those videos that looks like the the Octoman from from Duke Nukem." You think that somebody really was like, "Oh, yeah, look at these videos. It looks like the Octoman from Do you see anybody in the comments being like, yeah, man, I played Duke Nukem. I totally agree with you. I I totally saw the resemblance." This is like the guy that claimed that they found the cloud photos because they were like they found they magically found reversed mirrored cloud photos when they were looking on the internet for 20 minutes.

Yeah, bro. Uh-huh. You got any other stories? At least make your fake story convincing, man. What I ask is And by the way, yes, I have reached out to these people and they won't answer any questions cuz they're just making up [ __ ] stories. Because this story will fall apart under basic scrutiny.

This story story will completely fall apart under basic scrutiny and Redditors are [ __ ] And so they don't ever ask any basic questions. They're out there in the in the comments going, "Yes, I played video games in the '90s." My God. How stupid are these people? >> [clears throat] >> I wanted to know if I could find the specific sprite I was thinking of. Oh, so hey, man, I miraculously was thinking about a specific boss in Duke Nukem and a and a sprite from the graphic effects from the '90s from 30 years ago and I was like, "Hey, I should go find that sprite."

And it turned out it was the exact sprite. Come on, bro. Just stop, man. Just stop. Just tell the truth, man. Isn't telling the truth easier than lying?

Isn't telling the truth just easier than lying? And then you look at this and you go, "Wait, this is how you saw it? This the bottom left one is supposedly from the is the is the one here. That's how you were able to be like, "Oh yeah, that right there looks like the videos." Nothing in here looks anything like the videos, dude. In fact, you have to completely edit this to even get it to look anywhere similar.

Which of these do you think looks like the videos? How stupid were the Redditors that were upvoting this? This is the easiest, fakest, dumbest fake story I've ever heard. How are you people falling for this stupid [ __ ] I'm seriously asking. If you fell for this, you are a [ __ ] [ __ ] You are absolute [ __ ] and we should be spending resources on people that should You should basically be not breathing the air and letting somebody who can actually think for themselves do it. I searched on that site and found familiar-looking explosions.

After finding there was possibly a CD. So, this is actually isn't even on the internet. This graphic wasn't even on the internet. The dude imagined the graphic. The graphic wasn't even on the internet. How could they make it?

They used a a CD? And uploaded their stock effect from a CD and then started manipulating it? That's your story now? Not even they downloaded from the internet cuz it wasn't available? Holy [ __ ] >> [clears throat] >> And then they find this. This is a new archived version.

I think this is the new one. No, maybe this isn't the one. Is this the one? Oh yeah, this is the one. They changed it. I forgot they changed it.

This is the Waverider. This link right here. Oh, sorry. I'm not sharing the right screen. This link they shared that I just clicked on is the Wave Rider 3000. They made it look like it was an old uploaded archive, but it's not.

It's actually a recent re-upload that they did, and they dishonestly put in the zap from the MH370 video to make it look like it was part of the effects. So, the person that uploaded this is a 100% bad faith bad actor. That link right there proves that somebody is a liar. And this person referencing it proves they're connected to it. They were the first person to ever post that link.

If you guys don't believe me, have the AI go through the AI and say, AI, say, go through Ashton's live streams and find the Wave Rider 3000 live stream where Ashton specifically goes through all the evidence about this. After we caught this person in real time, they went and edited this archive, and they changed the image, and they removed the MH370 zap because they were watching my live streams. How crazy is that? Caught them in real time. You should go watch those live streams. That was an incredible couple uh week that we said that happened. Okay.

I then viewed the shockwave video attempting to find the frame that looks similar. I did not expect it to be a complete match. I did not expect it to be a complete match. Straight-up lie. Straight-up lie. There's no match whatsoever.

There's not a complete match. There's not even a partial match. There's absolutely no match. There's not a match on one frame. There's not a match on any frames whatsoever. That's a fact.

There's no forensic analysis whatsoever in this post. Actually, there's no analysis whatsoever at all in this post. You scroll up to This is the whole post. There's not even a comparison of these two images. They just posted two images and said they're the same when they're not. That's it. Like literally this is it. This is the whole post. I did not expect a complete match. There's no match.

You didn't even show a match. I did a direct overlay and show that they don't match. Took 5 seconds. How are people praising this? By the way, this was literally used to ban all discussion of the videos. This Reddit post was used to ban all discussion of the videos.

It's just completely trust me, bro. I intended to find and then share the similarities between a unique effect. There's This effect is not unique at all. This is actually called a Taylor set-off blast wave and it's not unique >> Set-off blast waves are commonly found in strong explosions, often found in >> It's actually extremely common and every single explosion has this exact pattern. Every single one. >> Supernovae, shock waves, or explosions in various environments such as land, water, space, and air. Small fluctuations in the density or pressure of the surrounding medium can lead to the perturbations or a bumpy pattern in the blast waves.

For example, in 2021, researchers from the Royal Astronomical Society ran hydrodynamic simulations of supernova blast waves propagating through the interstellar medium. One of the frames is nearly a perfect match to the VFX effect from the 1990s that is being used >> Chat. Is that experiment fake? I mean, that's a perfect partial match on the frame, right? That's the exact same thing debunkers are arguing. Debunkers are arguing you can take one quarter of one edge and as long as the pattern the wavy pattern matches, then it proves it's the same and that you can ignore entirely ignore the middle.

That's what they claim. Well, then how come I can do this with three more effects? This is only one. There's two more coming. Three more effects. I can do the exact same thing. >> used to supposedly >> They can't all be the They can't all been used.

Which one was used in the videos? >> debunk MH370 videos. Unless you believe the Royal Astronomical Society is faking its results. These are clearly not the same asset. In 2011, researchers from McGill University exploded glass particles with C4. Again, we can clearly see the Taylor setoff blast pattern emerge from the explosion. And once again, we can overlay one single frame from the same blast wave from the C4 explosion on top of the '90s stock VFX footage and find a nearly identical match.

Does this mean the McGill researchers faked their blast wave? Of course not. In 2018, researchers from the Royal Society of Chemistry ran experiments on the jetting patterns of flower explosions in order to mimic the patterns found in volcanic eruptions, meteorite impacts, explosions of landmines, and other explosions. Once again, we can take a single frame from one of their experiments and find a match to the VFX stock effect from the 1990s.

By now, it should be obvious that patterns from Taylor setoff blast waves can be found in a wide variety of different environments, proving that the MH370 videos are not debunked by stock VFX footage from the 1990s. >> Shout out to level 39. We had a lot of random people come out of the woodwork and support us. You know my favorite part is a lot of the people that were supporters weren't even didn't even like me. Didn't even like me, but those were my favorite people. Some guy named Purvi. That he was just like look, the evidence is clear.

You guys are lying and the debunkers were lying and he was just calling it out. He's like, I don't even like Ashton Forrest, but he's right. Those are the people that I want to be friends with. We don't have to agree on literally anything. But we can still be friends as long as we can agree to see facts and evidence the same. It's not a big ask.

So, anyway, finishing up with this stupid debunk thing. This is a completely fake story. This is a completely fake story. None of that [ __ ] happened. Doesn't even match. And the guy is lying throughout the entire post. And as you can see from his post history, he never actually does any follow-up.

It's clearly just a shill account that was trying to push a fake story. And they're reposting it now because they're afraid. Why are they afraid? Because they know I'm about to go talk to some experts. They know that the Tucker Carlson episode or the Shadow Figures episode on Tucker Carlson Network, it's not a Tucker Carlson episode. The Shadow Figures episode on Tucker Carlson Network is going to drop in a few weeks.

They also know there's a major publication that's about to drop an article about me as well. They know all these things are about to drop and they're trying to get out ahead of it. They know that people are going to start searching for this stuff and they're going to start asking questions. So, they're starting to try to get their content back up to the top of the Google searches so that when people start searching, they're going to see Ashton Forbes is a grifter. This has been debunked. Don't look at this anymore.

Stop looking at this. This was debunked a thousand times. We debunked it so many times. Were any of the debunks true? No. But we debunked it like a hundred times. Not one of them was a real debunk, but a thousand fake debunks is equal to one real debunk. So, get ready for it, guys.

Thank you. Thank you, Markiplier. Some of you have been listening to me. And Markiplier has proven right now. Everybody gets called gay on the internet. And somehow I have avoided it.

Despite the fact having millions of haters out there. So, thank you, Markiplier, for keeping it real. Keeping it real. Now, >> [sighs] >> we're going to go to super chats cuz I think we've hit most of the evidence that I wanted to talk through. We're going to talk through the We're not done. We've got at least one or maybe two more live streams where we're going to talk about some MH370 stuff.

Um but we've got a pretty good list here. We've got a pretty good list. If we can confirm the cameras, the flight characteristics, the engineering specifics of the Boeing 777. If we can confirm any of the evidence related to the satellite images, the missing radar data, the Inmarsat pings, the debris, the witness sightings, the acoustic data, the cell phone data, we got a lot of ways where we can prove the MH370 videos are real. So, everybody, I want all of you to pray for me. Pray for our seeker of knowledge, collector of knowledge, who wants to bestow upon us some information.

And I want you to pray for the victims and the families of the victims of MH370. Because we are the only people that has been trying to seek the truth. And there is a concerted effort to make sure that truth is never uncovered in our lifetimes. Ignore the free energy. Ignore the warp drives and the teleportation and the gravity manipulation for a second. Just bring it back down to the human level.

239 people on board an airplane vanished without a trace. Nobody knows where the plane is, except for us and the United States government. And we're being told to stop looking into it. Nobody knows what happened, and we're being told, "Don't look into that. Stop looking into that." In fact, they're claiming that we're harming the families by looking into it.

We have to remember that at the end of the day, at the heart of this, there are 239 people whose lives were taken. And even if you argue that this was an operation against China, which is what I'm literally arguing, it's pretty unjustifiable. It's unjustifiable to target a civilian airliner, period. And I'm pretty sure I can make a good argument for why you didn't have to do it at all. Why you could have done this a million other ways that don't require taking 239 lives. But that's what we'll leave the government to try to justify.

So, we have to remember that, guys. Please remember that as you have a good night. Let's go over our super chats. Woke Societies, thank you very much from that for that raid in the pill chat. Is there an easier way to see gold pills and things like that? How do I do that?

Guys, I don't know how to do that in the pill chat. So, if I miss your donation, I apologize, but big shout-out to Woke Societies. Definitely my number one supporter in the pill chat. Really enjoy his content. Talks about some good stuff. If you guys are on the pill chat, please make sure you guys are checking out Woke Societies.

Let's support some other independent journalists, some small content creators who are just trying to make a name for themselves, guys. Woke Societies, thank you very much. Appreciate you. Methyl and all my people in the pill chat, thank you guys for hanging out. Hope you guys have a good night. Rumble chat.

Ooh, double M's with the super chat. Let me hit this up. By the way, guys, yes, I do back in the day I used to answer every question in the chat, and the reason why that stopped was mostly because it's impossible, but also because I want to focus on delivering high-quality content and not answering questions in the chat unless it's pertinent. So, but I do want to try to answer relevant questions, and I don't want people to feel like you have to super chat me to get an a question answered. And also, I'm nobody special.

You shouldn't even feel like you have to super chat me like, "Oh, Ashton, are what are prepper supplies worthwhile?" Hey, man, if you need to be told that, that's fine, but you really shouldn't need to super chat me stuff like this. That's all I'm saying. But I'm happy to answer it. Okay. Double M says, "Thank you for all you do, Professor Ashton.

Keep on exposing the lies and showing us the truth." Thank you, Double M's, KC Sierra, and Wild Lurker, and everybody in my Rumble chat, fam. War Ranch LLC says, "Finland recently did transmitted power through the air, Tesla tech." I agree. This is highly controversial, but I think that this is actually happening. I think what we're seeing here is we're seeing a roll out of wireless energy transmission via scalar waves.

And we're probably going to see it underneath some other coded language. And people are going to try to conceptualize it in a classic framework. Now, I haven't dug into it too much to say that that's exactly what's going on. Probably isn't. But I think that's where this is headed, with wireless with wireless energy and wireless power transfer. It's real.

It's going to start getting rolled out. We're seeing in the form of directed energy weapons being admitted to be real by the government. And the next step is literally Tesla wireless energy. I mean, we've got wireless cell phone power or wireless communications. Why can't we get energy? The way I personally imagine it going down, don't hate me if I'm wrong, >> [clears throat] >> is that you would have like a charge like table that you put something on the table or something in the corner of your house, and anything in the corner automatically charges.

Cuz otherwise, you don't want to be sitting in that all the time. That's the only downside. Oh, speaking of this, side note, nobody asked, DJT is at an all-time low. This is why I tell you to never listen to my investment advice. I told you guys, "Invest in DJT." Actually, I said, "I'm investing in DJT."

I said it was not investment advice. 50 Gs flushed down the toilet, chat. Just like that. I mean, not really. I still own the stock, but stock is only at $6 right now. So, what's my response?

I'm going to take the $25,000 bounty that nobody has been able to claim and I'm going to put it in there. We're increasing the portfolio, chat. 25 Gs. We're adding it to the DJT, chat. This is not investment advice. Just telling you what I'm doing because I absolutely believe.

Now, here's my concern. I'll give it to you guys both sides. My concern is that the deal is not going to go through. My deal My concern is that something's going to happen and they're going to block the the Tri Alpha Energy deal, which is the fusion company that you're trying to merge with. I'm not actually interested in investing in DJT. I really just want to invest in Tri Alpha Energy, but they're a private company, so you can't invest in them.

So, the merger makes it so that you get a back door way to invest in the fusion company. That's what this is all about if you're not reading between the lines here. But, so this is kind of a gamble. The gamble here is that the deal will go through. Cuz if this deal goes through, there's no way this doesn't make money in the long run. There's basically no way this doesn't make money in the long run.

We know the fusion's happening. Um So, I wanted to bring that up. Nobody asked, but there you go. Now, the bounty still exists. I have another 25,000 for if anybody can actually do that bounty. You may say, "Action, what's the bounty?

I haven't been paying attention." Okay, fine. Chill out. Here we go. The bounty is very, very simple. You just have to find this image.

Why isn't it loading? Oh, there it is. Look. This is the only photo that anyone needs to make the entire background of the Gorgon Stare video. If you pan out the Gorgon Stare video, if you unwrap it, you can actually just see the plane go down here through the middle of these clouds and then over to the right, and that's the whole background of the video. How crazy is that?

Those clouds like not those don't obviously have all these clouds, but some of these clouds are in the video. But the weird part is on the right over there, on the bottom right, there's a missing cloud. There should be a giant cloud there. And it's not there. So, here's the deal. Debunkers have been claiming this photo was used to make the videos.

Well, the videos were on the internet May 19th, 2014. There's no evidence this photo was on the internet until October 25th, 2014. That's 5 months later. That's when the API of the only place where this photo can be found on the internet says it was first uploaded. October 25th, 2014. That's a fact.

You can go check the API right now from textures.com and it will say this photo was uploaded October 25th, 2014. Okay. So, if you argue with me and you say that this photo was actually uploaded in 2012, which is what people are claiming, you have to provide proof. You can't just say, "Hey man, the metadata says it was taken in 2012." I can change the metadata in 5 seconds to say it was made in 1947. Doesn't mean it's from 1947.

If this photo was uploaded and it was on the internet for 2 years, then there's an archive of it somewhere on the internet. The internet is a giant unfathomably large place. So, go find the photo. If you can find an archived website that shows this was on the internet before May 19th, 2014 or ideally March 8th when the plane disappeared then you can win $25,000. And if you can't then you can never say the videos are fake. Because there's absolutely no evidence this cloud photo exists.

What happened was they found out the videos leaked cuz they leaked on March 19th or May 19th and they had 6 months to plant this fake photo on the internet. They were afraid that somebody was going to find out that those videos were real. So, they planted a fake photo on the internet in case somebody highlighted the videos and they would be like, "Oh, no, those videos are fake." That's exactly what they did. It's exactly what they did. They took the Gorgon Stairway to Heaven footage, the original footage, they didn't take the video, they didn't reverse engineer these photos from the video.

They took the original footage which they had access to, the high quality they put it in AI. That's why these clouds look fake at the top cuz they are fake. They put this [ __ ] in AI and they had it render a scene. That's why the cloud is also missing in the bottom right. Because they used real photos, they rendered it in AI and AI is [ __ ] And AI moved the cloud to a different photo. You can actually use AI and see AI do this [ __ ] all the time today, right now.

That's how I know that's what they did. Anyway, there you go. $25,000. >> [clears throat] >> Carry Ethernet subscriber Let's see what our chat are doing here. Carry Ethernet subscriber says I would ask Edward Lin about his Pac-Com and what MH370 Okay, look, man, if I was talking to Edward Lin I would tell you. Actually, first of all, if I was talking to Edward Lin, I wouldn't tell you. If I was interviewing Edward Lin, I just wouldn't say [ __ ] We would just record that [ __ ] and I would drop it and there would be no fanfare and it is what it is.

But yeah, so I was talking to Edward Lynn, we'd have about a million questions, bro. I mean, Edward Lynn knows exactly what went down. Edward Lynn knows the context of those videos, he knows about the operation, he probably knows about the orbs. Right? That's why he's not That's the reason why Edward Lynn's not talking. The reason why Edward Lynn's not talking is cuz he knows all that [ __ ] and they'll just kill him.

They'll just kill him if he talks. You guys Are you kidding me? He's got the kind of NDA He already went to prison, they probably already told him they'll kill him if he talks. Brian Pemble, thank you for that donation. Seems to me that Trump can pardon Edward Lynn. I mean, he should.

This is actually the ultimate solution. After the story goes viral one day in the future, the next step is the president just pardons Edward Lynn, and then Edward Lynn just tells us the true story. Okay? That's all we really need to have happen here. The orbs and all the teleportation stuff, all that's just going to unravel once the MH370 story gets told. That's why it doesn't even matter.

We don't really have to prove the orbs and the teleportation, just prove that's what we did to the plane, and then the rest of the stuff will just come along with it. Thank you, Brian Pemble uh Pemble, or is it Pemble? Yeah, Pemble. Zapperu Zappariah, the only thing I want to hear from the haters is the sound of the ball shortly. Honestly, if I was gay, then that would sound great. But reality is, I don't think there's any way some of these people can make up to us.

Some of these people have spent the last 3 years inventing fake debunks. And for some of them, I think they are just quite literally mentally ill. Like, cognitive dissonance takes over. And instead of even considering the possibility the videos can be real, they just keep doubling down on fake comparisons, fake debunks. They What were some of the other things they made up? Like they claimed there was two matching frames.

They claimed that the the the smoke missile lines with the plane in one frame. The amount of fake [ __ ] these people have made up to cope with two real military videos is absolutely insane. They should do entire psychological studies on the mental illness of debunkers and how they imagine fake debunks to rationalize away real videos. It would be extremely insightful and I think it should be a mandatory college class for kids so they can learn about human sociology. Sonia Sullivan one hundo dollars. Look at that Benjamin.

You just dropping Benjamins out here? This is the issue I can't get past. Every independent system gives us another test. Radar, satellite, thermal, acoustics, debris. If the videos are a hoax, how does the hoaxer keep surviving independent evidence that the creator shouldn't have controlled? This is a really great point, but the problem Sonia, I'm going to tell you the problem right here. You're too intelligent. >> [snorts] >> The problem is that you're too smart, Sonia. Is that you can think critically and rationally and realize there's like a million factors that a hoaxer would have never ever ever thought of, not in a million years.

Even if they were in the military and they knew how the systems work, they still would have messed it up when they were trying to fake them. But in reality they've perfectly made surveillance videos exactly like real surveillance systems with a real drone, with a real Boeing 777, with real flight characteristics of a real missing plane. This is why I say that the debunkers are quite literally mentally ill. In any other scenario, any other scenario in the entire world this would be overwhelming evidence beyond any beyond any doubt. But because it's literally orbs teleporting a plane, they just can't accept it no matter what.

They can't accept it. It doesn't It probably doesn't even matter how high you stack the evidence. And this is why when I announced that I was going to talk to some experts, that I had insiders ready to talk, this is why they all panicked. Because they know there's no Nothing can change their minds. They know that they were never really trying to have their minds changed. They've been trying to convince other people of lies.

And they know their whole house of cards will collapse under the scrutiny of actual experts. That's why they were all freaking out. That's why they were all screaming, "It doesn't matter who Ashton brings on. We haven't even heard anything yet, but we already know that you should not listen to anybody he has on." They're panicking. And they should panic.

They're about to be exposed as complete and total frauds and con artists, every single one of them. Every single one of the debunkers. That shouldn't be a surprise to many of you. A lot of you already knew that about them. But it's going to be really brutal, guys. And I'll be honest with you, I am not going to go easy on them in the future.

Everything I said I was going to do to them, I am going to do 100% absolute promise. I'm going to make those people and their names my main content in the future. That's what my content's going to be is them. The same way that they'd made me their content. So, I hope they enjoy it. I hope they enjoy the last days on Earth.

Mula Viking. If they can teleport a plane, would it have been to another place in the air? Could it not have been teleported out of space to the bottom of the ocean? Here's the thing about teleportation. It works in a very real way. In theory, they could do anything.

But the questions you have to ask is you have to get full anime mindset. What do I mean by that? You need If you don't understand what I'm talking about, you need to watch more animes. In the animes, the hero always breaks down exactly how the villain's power works. They say, "Oh [ __ ] this villain is using his mind powers and he's able to tap into the extra dimension and he's able to then warp in and his weakness is Oh, well, if you say his name three times and it breaks his concentration."

I don't I'm just making that all up, but you get the point. That's also true of teleportation. Don't think of teleportation is just straight-up magic. If you're doing that, then sure, anything's possible, of course. If you If you just say it's magic, but the moment you start saying, "Okay, wait, what are the actual physical mechanisms for teleportation?" Then you start to realize the answer is no, it can't just be anything.

There's actually a number of limited answers to where the plane could have gone. And the very first one is they're shooting it in a straight line. That's actually weird in of itself, because you would think if I can teleport something, can't I just teleport it like anywhere to anywhere? Apparently not. Maybe in the future, but not with that video. Those orbs are shooting the plane exactly backwards.

That's why they're squeezing the plane exactly vertically around it. So, to answer your question, no. There's actually specific mechanism by which this works and the one of those mechanisms is the plane doesn't just fall out of normal space forever. It decays and falls back into our normal reality. One of those forms of quantum teleportation says, "You're basically just shooting it as far as you can through hyperspace invisibly, but then it just falls back into our reality after that." So, the most likely outcome is simply that the plane was translocated. AKA, the plane disappeared over here and reappeared over here.

Probably relatively instantly. There you go. Good super chat, though. Appreciate that. Thank you very much Mula Viking. Markie Pie, great work.

Hope you have enough questions. I think we're going to have more than enough questions. I'm actually worried about the time with them. I'm I'm expecting like 4 hours. We'll see though. Debunk the science.

You can't. "Derd is the word." Thank you, Matt Bartleson. And yes, I don't just focus on the science. I do love science. Science is very fun.

And I enjoy it, but I also enjoy the true crime angle to all this, the cover-up aspect of all of this. Um what else? The military surveillance. All of it's very interesting to me. So, we didn't talk too much about science today. But that's why all of my content spans these various uh >> [clears throat] >> different communities, I guess.

Anyway, Sonya Sullivan, another follow-up super chat. Thank you, Sonya Sullivan. Appreciate you. "Ashton's so gay." says Zapperiah. "Great matchmaker though." Thank you, Zapperiah.

Thank you, Zapperu. You guys are awesome. Appreciate you guys. >> [snorts] >> Kyle Newp, BC War X. Are you You're not Kyle Newp, are you? Yeah, I've seen some of his stuff. I'm a little concerned about people that are a little too self-promotional.

Uh so, I don't know, guys. There's a lot of people in the UFO community that have stories. In fact, I was going to play a clip of that JP guy that Mike Sala is always promoting cuz he's he's they've been pretty much saying like, "Hey, you're right." They've been saying that you know, MH370 was zapped by orbs. But the problem is now they're going, "Oh, I saw that, too." And here's the reality.

I don't want to tie this story to anybody else's personal claims. So, it's not personal. I'm happy to talk to people, but I'm I'm just a little worried and wary about people that are like self-promoting too much because I feel like a lot of people are going to come out there and what they want to do is they want to say, "Hey, yeah. I saw this, too." But, really what they want is they want to say, "Hey, this validates my story." I'm not trying to do that. I'm not trying to say, "Hey, these orbs are real.

This proves your story's real." If you want to do that, that's great. I'm happy for you. But, when you do that to me and then it turns out you were a con artist, that you were lying or something, then people are going to come back at me and say I'm I was lying, too. So, that's the reason why. I'm just being honest with you guys. >> [clears throat] >> Thank you very much for that super chat, though.

Appreciate you. I'll check into him, though. See what he's been [clears throat] saying on the internets. Thank you, BC Works. And then Celestial Skies says, "Could it be possible that the orbs are real to hijack the plane and the explosion was added?" A lot of people ask this.

The answer is no. Where do you think the plane is? Well, just think about this. Where do you think the plane is? So, you think they made real videos and you think somebody added in a fake explosion effect and then what happened to the plane? Your story just falls apart there. You think the Okay, so the plane is now not there anymore.

Where is the plane then? So, they made fake videos of a plane vanishing out of the sky in the Nicobar Islands for what purpose? What was the point? How did they know the plane wouldn't be found 10 years later? I'm not trying to be rude. I'm just telling you it makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.

This is actually part of the reason why there can't be a hoaxer, either. How would the hoaxer know we would never find the plane? If we found the plane at any moment, the hoax videos would fall apart. If we find the plane, then videos of a plane vanishing out of the sky wouldn't make any sense. The only way That's why the videos literally have to be real. They can't be even partially edited.

Cuz that's actually what really happened to the plane. It's the only thing that actually makes sense of what happened to the plane. I know this is hard for people to believe cuz they don't think teleportation's real. But, that's actually the only thing that actually fits with the evidence of what really happened on the plane. So, that's the reason why the videos are real. In addition to the fact that they are objectively military surveillance.

Now, the last piece to answer that question, this is one of the questions a lot of people used to ask me all the time. Why would the United States of America government and or CIA, cuz I'm not saying they can't. The CIA could have faked those videos. They just didn't. The same way where Israel kill could have killed Charlie Kirk, they just didn't. Right?

There's no evidence for it. Why would you make fake videos that implicate you? That those videos show a Reaper drone. If I'm making fake video of a plane vanishing, the very last thing I'm going to do is put an MQ-9 Reaper drone in the very first shot. There's only one country that uses this MQ-9 Reaper drone, it's the United States of America. Why would United States of America make a video that implicates them in the disappearance of the plane?

That doesn't make any sense. Like yeah, we made a fake video that implicates us. The whole point of this video is that this has to be a US operation based on how it's recorded. This is them recording their own operation. Because they record all their own operations. So, wait, they they made a fake video about an operation, but so where's the plane then?

Oh. I mean, if they found the plane somewhere, then yes, I'd say this is obviously a fake video that they made to just to confuse people. But they didn't find the plane. So, this is a real video that isn't confusing people, it's telling the truth. They vanished the plane out of the damn sky just like you saw right there on the screen. That's what they did.

Okay, guys, that's it for tonight. Thank you so much for all the super chats. Thank you everybody in the all of the chat, Rumble chat, X chat. All of you guys are just engaging, making this possible. I don't say this enough. None of this would have ever been possible without all of you.

Just this morning, just this afternoon before I got on this live stream, I was looking at the chat flying, and I was just telling myself, I never in a million years ever imagined I would be a live streamer that's got so many people chatting that it's going faster than I can even scroll. Never in a million years would I have thought that. So, shout out to all of you. You're all the real heroes. And truthfully, when MH370 comes out, the truth comes out, you guys deserve credit.

I deserve a lot of credit, but you guys deserve a lot of credit, too, because without all of you pushing on this, nobody would ever be listening. Nobody would ever be listening. Have a great night. Love you, MH370. Special shout out to the CIA. I know you're my number one followers.

I love you guys, too, even though you're scumbags. Have a great night, everybody. Peace out. We're going to try a new way to end the stream, so if this messes everything up, I apologize. Let's see. >> Out in the fields [music] where the skies are wide, talking about a journey through the cosmic ride. Einstein and [music] Thorne, they set the stage for trip through time across the space age.

Wormholes connect distant points in space, traversable paths to a far-off place. >> [music] >> No black holes pull, no crushing weight, just a cosmic tunnel to a distant gate. Talking wormholes, stargates, negative [music] energy. Travel through the cosmos, it's our destiny. >> MH370, [music] where did it go? Boeing 777 through a wormhole flow. We're talking wormholes, stargates, [music] negative energy. Travel through the cosmos, it's our destiny.

MH370, where did it go? Boeing 777 through a wormhole flow. >> [music] [music] >> Exotic matter, [music] negative energy is the key to stabilize the wormhole for you and me. Quantum vacuum, squeeze so [music] tight, creating conditions for this wondrous flight. Static fields and lasers in the lab [music] they play, generating forces in a new kind of way. Gravitational squeezing, Casimir [music] force, negative zones we need to stay the course. >> Talking wormholes, stargates, negative energy, travel through the cosmos, it's our [music] destiny. MH-370, where did it go?

Boeing 777 through [music] a wormhole flow. Tensorial formalism plays so fine, spherical geometry we realign. Energy conditions that we must [music] defy. For stable wormhole, let's give it a try. >> [music] [music] >> Coulomb forces balancing the plates, creating the throat, opening gates. From Earth to the stars in a single bound, a shortcut through space profound. Engineers and dreamers hold the key to future worlds and what we could be.

With science in hand, we forge ahead through the cosmic paths that we now tread. >> [music] >> We're talking wormholes, stargates, negative energy, travel through the cosmos, it's our [music] destiny. MH-370, where did it go? Boeing 777 through a wormhole flow. From the fields to the stars, we break the chains. Understanding [music] the universe, we make the gains. Lil Buddha calm shines, bringing truth to light.

Through his music, [music] we'll explore the night. With wormholes and stargates, our path is clear. Exploring the cosmos, our future's here.