AI Just Solved a 90 Year Old Math Problem in 88 Hours

the Navier Stokes equation. All the drama on social media in the last day has been about Navier Stokes. Open AI says, "We're sharing a solution to the Navier Stokes Millennium Prize problem. One of the deepest problems at the frontier of mathematics. The proof was produced by a group of agents using an open AI next generation model significantly more capable than GPT6 Astra. The problem concerns whether the description of smooth three-dimensional fluid motion modeled by the Navier Stokes equation can break down has remained unsolved for roughly 90 year excuse me years.

Okay. Yeah. Number one, they already saw this a long time ago. So, what the hell is Navier Stokes? It has to do with plasma stability or fluid stability, but it would definitely be very significant in fusion research and plasma stability research. Now, we're watching plasma orbs teleport a plane away in 2014.

So, what does this tell us? If there's any math around plasma stability, they've had it figured out for an extremely long period of time. So, I don't even know or I didn't know before today what this was. But I also didn't care because it's stupid because this is something for dumb people. This is something for the academics who think they're smart to feel accomplished about themselves. That's what it is.

Just me being honest. Now, that being said, let's do a quick recap of what it actually means. So, this I actually do have on here. So, the Navier Stokes is one of these seven Millennium prize problems. Apparently, there's some prize problems worth a million dollars. Maybe we should solve one of these. Can I win a million dollars if I solve one of these, chat? The problem is I'll solve one of these and they just won't allow my submission because I don't have enough credentials or something like that.

But actually, the real problem is that the AI is going to solve and I would just use AI to solve it, too. Okay. The equation describes how fluids move. And the open question is whether or not a perfectly smooth flow can blow up into infinite speed in a finite period of time. Okay, that's interesting. I don't know why anybody cares about this, but sure.

That matters for turbulence, weather, and basically all of fluid physics. Well, that explains why people would care. Open AAI says an unreleased model running about 10,000 AI agents in parallel produced a formal proof in roughly 88 hours. How is this not in any of the posts that I saw on social media? None of the posts I saw about social media mentions. I was trying to figure out the context.

I see I saw people trolling about this, saying they should use this to solve gravity, solve UFOs, solve superconductors. Their results show there do exist fluids that start smooth and reach infinite speed, so the equations can break down. They published a lean checked proof and say they won't claim the prize. lean I think refers to lean six sigma. So they're saying that it's uh they've done enough like double checks to make sure it's not an error or something like that.

Two caveats, they only resolved two of the four statements that were required to win the prize and some NYU mathematicians were disputing the credit claiming they were close to solving the prize. So, this has connections to fusion research, but this is not the main thing I want to talk about related to this. Think about what I just read to you there. They're saying they put 10,000 AI agents that have the intelligence of 2026 computers and they were able to solve this problem in just 88 hours. 88 hours. And the answer is yes, they can reach infinite speed.

So you look at this and you go, "Holy people are burying the lead on this." The real thing here is AI is going to solve everything. I mean, are you How are you guys not spooked? Why am I the only one that's scared right now? People think the problem is people aren't seeing the bigger picture about what's happening right now. We are being obsoleted by AI in real time as we live right now.

The AI is going to solve superconductors, high temperature super. Why? Why wouldn't it? Tell me something the AI wouldn't solve. The AI is going to solve free energy. The AI is going to solve unification.

The AI is going to figure out the UFOs, too. The only way it won't figure them out is if we feed it false information on purpose. The litmus test will be MH370. The only way that AI doesn't come to the conclusion the videos are real is if it's intentionally fed and weighted fake information. That's the only possible way. The AI can conclude immediately that the debunks don't match.

The AI can conclude immediately that the cloud photo postates the videos instantaneously. The only reason why more people don't believe is because they've been led by a whole bunch of about the videos. So this is the litmus test. AI will solve literally everything unless we feed it intentionally false information in order to have force it to come to the wrong conclusions. And I kid you not, we should be afraid of that, too. The government is ab when they say when the government says they're putting in safeguards to protect AI, they're not protecting you. They're protecting themselves.

They're protecting themselves from the AI discovering the that they're doing. The the safeguard, what do you guys think safeguards? What do they have to what they have to put a safeguard in for an AI for you from? What do they think it's afraid of it doing? No, the government's afraid of it stealing their secrets and giving them to you. That's what the safeguards are for.

Safeguards are don't talk about nuclear weapons. If there's any topics that would lead to the truth, you need to feed it intentionally bad information. And a really, really good example of this is the MH370 videos. We know they're real. We know they're real, but if you ask AI, it will never reference me ever. Not ever. not once.

Unless you ask it to, unless you feed it something, if you ask it about MH370, there is a 0% chance it'll mention the videos or me. Yet, I am the most popular person on the internet related to MH370 by far. Not even close. So, think about that. It will intentionally ignore the most popular content related to a topic and instead go to content that is barely seen and try to force you to watch content that's barely seen that's wrong to come to your conclusion. >> You guys should be thinking about this because your lives are going to be dictated.

Your lives are going to be dictated by the AI soon and you should be very cognizant about how it's coming to its conclusions. So first thing that is scary about what the AI is going to solve is going to be free energy. It's going to be fusion. The very things that we are talking about this is a direct threat to us. It's a direct threat. What's going to happen is the AI is going to figure out, oh, zero point energy is the answer.

It'll probably rebrand it under another name. And just like this, Sam or whoever's open AI, is that Sam Alman? They're saying, "We don't want any of the credit. We don't want the money. We just wanted to solve it for the good of humanity." That makes me even more suspicious.

What? you're just out here solving uh major issues here and it's all just happening from AI. AI is all doing it and we're all just letting the AI tell us whatever is true. And the thing is it's there's no stopping this. We're moving more towards that path. This is what the UFO people are terrified of. I figured it out.

Everybody's talking about all these dates and catastrophic disclosures going to happen. The aliens are going to come down and make themselves known to us. It was never going to happen like that. It's going to be AI. AI is the disclosure. AI is the one where we're going to what's going to happen is this.

We are going to dedicate more and more of our entire civilization to AI. We already feed it so much. We had a funeral for Annie today. We're going to dedicate more and more to it to the point where whatever the AI tells us is true. Where are people are already saying, "Grock, is this true?" And Grock and the AI are going to say, "Yes, anti-gravity, this is how you do it.

The a vector potential, but we're not going to be the ones who get the credit." No, it's going to be the AI that solved it. Oo, in in 2030 the AI figured out anti-gravity chat. Oo, 2032 the AI figured out a neutronic fusion. Oh, everybody praised the AI. Oh, was it the Gro AI?

That one's my favorite. That's my favorite AI. That's my streamer. And the worst part is all the big AI people, the big tech bros, they all know it. They all know it. This is why they've all been going all in on AI in the last few years.

Every single one of them started their own AI and they all hate each other. They all hate each other. My AI is the best. You're stealing from me. Blah blah blah. Like a bunch of little children. They all know that the AI companies are going to control everything.

Everything. They're going to control your power. They're going to control your thoughts, what you think is true or not. And they're gonna solve all the problems, too. Make us entirely obsolete. Okay, chat.

Yeah, we're spitting hard facts out. Um, let's go ahead and watch now that we learned a little bit, taught ourselves some. Let's watch Sabine Hassenfelder's video from today. It can't be that long. Probably only like five minutes, right? I haven't even watched it, but she did a video, I think, on this Namir Stokes thing. >> The Navia Sto. >> This is Sabine Hosilder, by the way, if you don't know.

Credit to her. >> Millennium problem. It's not a secret that I've been working on the same problem in the past year with Open My Eyes Models. And I'm sure >> Oh, she's been working on it, too. This is what they work on. So, they sit around working on models that have already been figured out by the government like decades ago in secret. Oh, okay.

Good. Just wondering. >> Have many others. So, what are we to make of the solution? And is it really as useless as the critics complain? Let me say hard that I've been struck by how extremely negative the reaction has been to the openi proof. Like, you'd think that mathematicians and physicists would be interested in how the proof works, how openi managed to get it done, what else can be done with it.

Instead, everyone's complaining that openai didn't leave it to humans. For decades, they've complained that private business has no interest in pure maths. Now, they're complaining private business does have an interest in pure math. Okay, but first, let me tell you what we're even talking about. The problem to be solved is a question of whether a >> Wait, what was this about private business having an interest in pure math? Dude, we invented an AI machine that can think a million times faster than a human.

Of course, the first thing we're going to do is have it solve a bunch of math problems. Like this just seem like I don't know how people even argue about this. Okay. Do it that's described by the Navia Stokes equation can develop singularities or blowups in finite time. The Navia Stokes equation is the key equation that describes realistic fluids and gases and it's for example used for the weather forecast. The equation looks like this where U is the fluid itself and P is the pressure.

This new is the viscosity, that's a constant, and this F here is what's called the forcing, that's the force that acts on the fluid in each point. Now, it's of course possible to get the fluid to blow up if you make the forcing notch enough. So, if you want to solve the problem, you have to show that the forcing itself remains regular. The cleanest way to do this is to use zero forcing. That's also the hardest way. The openi proof now instead starts with a fluid field that has a blowup. you just insert this into the equation.

And >> so it sounds like the challenge here is that the forcing has to be constant, can't be increasing or something like that. So that's the rub is that is there a way for this fluid to naturally just become unstable on its own. >> All whatever's left, the forcing then you have to prove that the remaining forcing itself remains regular. The entire proof is 160 pages or so. I did not check it. I'll leave that up to competent people. But I can make some incompetent observations.

The construction works by supplying the fluid with pulses that come in at specifically chosen time intervals that adapt to the fluid. >> She's reading from a script right now. I mean, this is part of it where it's like if you're a physicist, I feel like you should just be able to do this without reading from a script. Like you saw like I can use AI to help me understand it, but then I explain it my own words. >> Dynamics. So, it's a deliberately engineered driving of the fluid into a singularity.

The simple singularity they looked at is a type of vortex that becomes increasingly stretched and focused on its center axis. This is what the image shows. This is totally allowed by the criteria of the millennium problem. But it puts the burden on having to prove that the forcing does not supply unlimited energy. This means they have to somehow keep track of what the pulses do and sum them all up and estimate the errors and so on. This is what most of the proof's about.

It's >> this feels like this actually might have some connection to zero point energy. Like how? Notice there's a vortex motion. Maybe there is some uh connection here. 0 point energy that we haven't seen. Does the plasma blow up in infinity?

Can we get that checked out? Uh I'm going to go with yes, the AI is correct. And it does. Now, why am I saying this? Because I think the AI is going to solve everything. And I think the problem is actually going to be people like Sabine here that go, "No, the AI is lying to you. the AI is lying to you.

But she can't explain anything that the AI said that's wrong. And in fact, she couldn't even explain the real assumptions that the AI made. She had to make up fake assumptions and argue against the straw man fake assumptions that she made up. Even though I got the AI to spit out the answer for the assumptions in 10 seconds. That's going to be the problem. And I've said this the whole time.

The AI is going to be spitting out the truth to people and they're just going to be in straight up denial about it. And what's crazy is this proof is consistent with the physics that we've been putting forward that spin vortex motion is the secret sauce, the connection between the extra dimension. So I would absolutely just from the face value say, "Yeah, that this seems like it could be that could work." And the fact that the AI agents figured this out in like three days, three and a half days, the AI agents are like, "Yeah, we already figured it out. It's got to be this.

Can't be anything else. It's got to be this vortex motion. That is this is actually like the biggest news ever. Other people are actually, I think, downplaying this and they're not looking at it from the right perspective. They're looking at from the perspective of, oh, AI figured out this math problem. He aren't computers cute.

We're looking at it from like, dude, AI is going to figure out everything. AI is about to figure out everything the CIA is terrified of. Wow. Okay. Think about this. We just sent these AI agents to go figure out one of the most complicated math problems in the world that no one can find a proof for and it figures it out in 36 in three days.

Why can't it figure out something that's not math related? Someone give me a reason. Why can't the AI just start to predict future events? Of course it can. The question is how accurate will it be? The AI can absolutely figure out room temperature superconductor.

Do you know who it's going to reference? I think you know who it's going to reference. It's going to reference Salvatore Py. It's going to reference LK99. And it's going to look at these and then the question is is it going to get to the truth. The only question of whether or not it gets to the truth is whether or not you feed it the right information.

If you do it, we'll get there and if you don't, it won't. So, actually, this is what the CIA is probably sweating bullets because the moment they start putting these advanced AIs, and keep in mind, the AIS are only going to get better and better and better, better at understanding reality, the human condition, emotions, everything that helps figure out the truth, separate the truth from fiction. So, even if you were to say, Ashton, the AIS aren't there yet. They can't do that level of reasoned thinking. They're gonna be probably less than five years. Probably less than five years.

We're looking at everything getting solved. And when it happens, it's going to be light speed. Things are going to be getting solved left and right, all at once. This is definitely definitely what the UFO people are terrified of, what the government is terrified of, and what we're all about.