Sal's Patents Watch Party
Summary
In this live stream, host Ashton Forbes analyzes a video interview between Navy engineer Salvatore Pais and Tim Ventura, arguing that Pais's patents describe the technology used to teleport Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 (MH370). Forbes asserts that the plasma orbs seen in the MH370 footage are not natural phenomena or alien craft, but rather human-made devices utilizing fusion, zero-point energy (ZPE), and spacetime manipulation.
He claims that Pais’s work on fiber lasers, superconductors (YBCO), and plasma compression provides the mechanical basis for these orbs, which function as compact fusion reactors capable of creating gravitational beams and wormholes. Forbes argues that the US government, specifically through agencies like the CIA and defense contractors like Northrop Grumman, has possessed this technology since the 1950s and is actively suppressing it to maintain geopolitical control and economic stability.
Forbes contends that prominent UFO disclosure figures, including Hal Puthoff, Jay Stratton, and Eric Davis, are aware of this technology but are engaged in a 'LARP' (live-action role-play) to distract the public. He suggests these figures are part of a deep state narrative that prioritizes 'alien' contact stories over the disclosure of free energy and warp drive technology.
The host emphasizes that the MH370 event was a covert operation involving the teleportation of the aircraft, supported by the presence of debris found on the African coast, which he interprets as evidence that the plane was moved rather than crashed. He concludes that the technology is real, classified, and that mainstream physicists and debunkers are intentionally misleading the public to prevent the societal disruption that would come from the release of free energy and advanced propulsion systems.
Key Claims (5)
Salvatore Pais’s patents describe the exact technology used to create the plasma orbs seen in the MH370 videos, which are compact fusion reactors capable of spacetime manipulation.
Evidence: Salvatore Pais’s patents (specifically the laser-augmented turbojet, EM field generator, and plasma compression fusion device); MH370 satellite footage.
MH370 was teleported using plasma orbs, not crashed, as evidenced by debris found on the African coast which Forbes believes proves the plane appeared elsewhere.
Evidence: MH370 satellite images; debris found on the African coast.
The plasma orbs are AI-controlled devices that use counter-rotating plasma and superconductors (YBCO, plus superconductivity whose critical temperature Pais says vibration can raise) to generate gravity beams and manipulate spacetime.
Evidence: Pais’s interview discussing YBCO, counter-rotating fusors, and AI control; MH370 video analysis.
Salvatore Pais says some of this technology has existed since the 1950s and believes there was a Manhattan Project-style effort behind what are now called UAPs; Forbes argues it is being withheld from the public.
Evidence: Salvatore Pais interview clip; Forbes' commentary
Mainstream physicists and debunkers are spreading misinformation to hold back humanity because they do not understand the physics of zero-point energy and spacetime manipulation.
Evidence: Forbes' critique of debunkers.
Theories Presented (2)
Video Details
- Published
- October 16, 2026
- Duration
- 2:02:10
- Views
- 11,379
- Claims Extracted
- 5
- Theories
- 2
- References
- 5
People Mentioned
Full transcript
Show
Malaysian 370 contact Ho Chi Minh 120 decimal 9er 9er. >> Breaking news tonight, a Malaysia Airlines flight with [music] 239 people on board including four Americans has gone missing. >> Even as these grainy satellite images [music] released today by the Chinese government >> Again, the the Malaysian flight too was a was one shot at China saying knock [music] it off. >> Why shoot it down though if it's not hostile? >> Our technologies permit us to manipulate time [music] and space. >> Why the Americans would? >> Any distance annihilator. >> This country's [music] very powerful. Far more powerful than people understand.
We have weaponry [music] that nobody has any idea what it is and it is the most powerful weapons in the world. Not even close. >> I remember the [music] line from the Hindu scriptures, the Bhagavad Gita. Vishnu >> [music] >> is trying to persuade the prince that he should do his duty and to impress him >> [music] >> takes on his multi-armed form and he says >> [music] >> "Now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds." >> [music] >> I suppose we all thought that one way or another. >> Ooh wee. Chat, welcome to the live stream. OMG guys.
Hey guys, haven't you all Haven't all of us had Joe Rogan just randomly say your name before? Like I think that all of us have been there before when we've heard Joe Rogan randomly just saying your name on on the biggest podcast in the world. >> Ashton Forbes, you know that super-jacked guy. >> You guys have all had that happen, right? You guys have all had Navy engineers want to talk to you about magical plasma orbs flying around because they say it validates their technology. You guys have all had that happen, right? Yeah, everybody has that happen.
You guys have all had it happen where generals have gone missing that may or may not have been leaking you fusion reactor schematics. Guys, I just want to put all this in context. If you have not been following along, you are in the middle of one of the greatest stories ever told, which is the revelation of technology far beyond where the public is currently at, maybe alien technology, as well as a major cover-up for what happened to real missing plane. And I want you to think about the fact that Salvatore Pais with his five Navy patents that we're going to be reviewing tonight. Whoa.
They're coming for me, chat. They got me, chat. They're coming for me. They're finally shutting me down, chat. I don't know if you heard the sirens. Okay, no. Salvatore Pais was willing to come and speak to me, willing to say that those videos are real.
Where's Hal Puthoff? Where's Eric Davis? Where's Jay Stratton? Where are all these UFO people that claim the government's reverse engineering UFO technology? Hey guys, if you're somebody that is saying the government's reverse engineering alien technology beyond our dreams, and then somebody shows you a video and goes, "Here you go. Here's proof.
Here's proof of the things that you're saying." Wouldn't you normally want to go like, "Hey, maybe I'll go talk to to person. Nope. Nope. None of those people want to talk to me. None of those people ever want to mention the MH370 videos.
How much more obvious can it be, guys? How much more Why don't they want to talk about real videos of the United States teleporting a plane? I thought that's their whole stick. I thought their whole stick was their claiming that the government has this exact technology. Why don't they want to talk about it? Exactly.
See no evil, hear no evil. What's going on? Cuz this is what people always want to know. Is neither side in the UFO disclosure is going to give you the truth. Think about that. This is how messed up the situation is.
Neither side wants to give you the truth. Sucks. That's the reality. One side wants to give you nothing and say nothing at all. And the other side says, "Well, we can let them know about the aliens." And we're sitting here going, "Can we know about the free energy?"
Can we know about the warp drives and wormhole machines that you built? Nope. Not allowed to know about that. You can know about aliens, though. Wow. >> [snorts] >> And again, anybody that questions what I've been saying on the science, ask yourself why won't Hal Puthoff talk about this? I'm his I'm the president of his fan club.
Every single person that talks about this science is referencing Hal Puthoff. He doesn't want to be that He doesn't want to be validated? He doesn't want to be vindicated? He doesn't want to win a Nobel Prize? If the MH370 videos get proven true, Hal Puthoff wins a Nobel Prize. >> [laughter] >> If teleportation is proven true, Hal Puthoff's physics gets proven true and he becomes the most famous physicist in all of history. But weirdly, he just has no interest in that.
You should ask yourself why. Why does he And And if you say, "No, Ashton, he just thinks you're, you know, mean or or or fake." Dude, he talked to you about a million fake people out there that didn't know what they were talking about. Hal Puthoff talks to everybody. But not me, though. It's not cuz he thinks the videos are fake.
I guarantee you that. It's not that. Okay, guys. Tonight, we are going to review Salvatore Pais's discussion interview with Tim Ventura. I thought it was incredible, and I just want to pick off where we left off because this is the answer. If you wanted to be in a skiff, a lot of UFO people dream of being in a skiff, now is your chance.
I guarantee you this is what they Salvatore Pais was telling the skiff. Probably didn't have as much time as he had with Tim Ventura, but that's what he's breaking down to people. It's just a no holds barred. I can tell you what's going on, how they're pumping energy, explain the resonance effects. If you think there's something more magical going on in the skiff, I'm sorry to be the one to tell you that Santa ain't real, but it's just normal human beings explaining normal stuff just without all the guardrails. You learn more on my live streams than you'll learn in the skiff.
That's okay, though. But you should be paying attention. Why? Because this is real technology. Salvatore Pais is a real Navy engineer, and he's got the top credentials when it comes to defense contractors. This guy has worked on some [ __ ] and he has seen some [ __ ] And if you're dismissing him because you're like, "Um my current model for physics doesn't allow for this."
Uh well, then you are going to be an imbecile in the future. You already are now, but you just haven't realized it yet. Let's get to it. Oh, right before that, only one announcement. We are going to have a live stream tomorrow as well, and we're going to dig into Jay Stratton's book, which obviously there's no major revelations, or there'd already be a thousand clips about it on the internet. I was basically just waiting around to see, are there going to be any clips of anything actually useful coming out of this book?
So far it seems like the answer is no, which is pretty much what we expected. Stories about aliens and hitchhikers and demons, and probably nothing about plasma orbs and teleportation. Saturday, Tim Ventura interview is going to drop. Set the reminder, set the notifications. I'm going to get that uploaded later tonight, maybe tomorrow. Uh make sure you guys check that out.
2 hours of geeking out about zero-point energy, about uh gravity manipulation, the engineers that worked on it, and really good back and forth, I think. I mean, I I think a lot of you guys are obviously going to land on my side that they really are hiding this, and that's what's going on, and it's sadly a lot of the people that are these nice engineers are also people hiding this. But Tim Ventura pushes back, I and and you know, we have a good respectful conversation on that.
So, if you are interested in that discussion, you should listen because there's very few even somewhat contested conversations in the UFO community. Everybody's always got to agree on everything all the time. It's hard to have conversations with people that don't, especially in topics where you're dealing with stuff that has very little evidence. So, this will be one that you will enjoy. Saturday, guys, 2:00. Okay.
Let's get to it. We're going to pick up where we left off here. We're about 6 minutes into this, and we're going to watch it on 1.25 speed. And here's the deal. My name is Ashton Forbes. Welcome.
Please take your seat. Please get your popcorn, whatever you want to get. Get ready, get buckled up. I'm here to interpret into English. I basically take Black Project Engineer speak, and I break it down in English for people. See, I see a lot of people in my in my replies going, "This is all gobbledygook."
And I just sit there and I wonder, "Which word don't you understand? Plasma, fusion, zero-point energy? I mean, which ones are we struggling with? None of these are made up words, they're all real physics. You're like, "Well, when you combine them, it doesn't mean anything." Well, I mean, if you're [ __ ] it doesn't mean anything.
If you understand basic physics, they definitely can be combined. Just because you don't understand it, that's a you problem, brother. Okay. So, that's why hopefully those people are watching this livestream. They need an education. They have to remember, know your stuff, chat.
K Y S. Know your stuff, redditors. >> [snorts] >> This is why we do it. We got to get them to know their stuff. >> Within the the the patent itself, but within a confined, basically, think of it as an electro-optic trap. That Okay. >> Okay. Okay. Okay.
Okay. Okay. Okay. Yatzee right off the bat, chat. And yes, I kind of cheated, kind of already had it ready to go here. Salvatore Pais, rewind.
Whoop. He's talking about his turbo fan engine here that he's turned into a little fusion reactor using lasers. He doesn't say the word fusion here. He just says laser-augmented turbojet. But he basically says that you can heat up this area with laser. And I'm going, well, that is literally exactly what fusion is doing.
It's exactly what fusion is. But then he said you can treat it like an electro-optical trap. I think he said more details already in this interview about these patents than in any other one. An electro-optical trap, that would be like a mirror. Right? You just say, let's boil it down, chat.
Let's bring it down to the normies. Electro-optical trap, Ashton, what the hell does that mean? Well, that means your laser enters, your laser is just electromagnetic wave of just one wavelength, right? Normal light is all different kinds of wavelengths. A laser is one wavelength. Okay?
So, your laser beam enters this region, area. And then what happens? It starts bouncing around. And then if it bounces around within this region, then you would say that it's trapped in that region. And how do you do that? Yes, refraction.
Basic refraction. You can trap it. So, plasma itself, we learned, plasma itself, if it's dense enough, compact enough, it can act as a mirror. So, plasma can actually cause the laser beam to be internally trapped inside of it. Fun stuff, guys. The reason why I bring this up, definitely definitely fusion-related.
And also think about this. You should be wondering, hmm, would they use this concept in nuclear weapons. Yes. Yes, Chad. A lot of this technology has direct applications to nuclear weapons. That's part of the reason why, if not the biggest reason why it's all classified, why it's being covered up.
A lot of people wonder why they cover this up, why don't they use it? Because it's bigger than nuclear weapons. Like, people are like, "Why don't they use this on Iran?" Why don't we use a nuclear weapon on Iran? Why don't we use something a million times more powerful than a nuclear weapon on Iran? Is that a serious question?
Probably for the same reasons we don't use a regular nuke on them. Guys, if you had nuclear weapons, how come you don't use them on Iran? Think about that. Think about it if I if I my premise was, "Hey, man, guys, nuclear weapons are fake, dude. If you really had nuclear weapons, you'd be using them on Iran and on Russia." Yeah, man.
You got it. Okay, let's get going. >> keeps this energy confined so as to increase the temperatures within the combustion chamber. >> So, that was Yeah, again, 2004. And I I remember when, you know, the there was there was there was a big change. They started to come out with more powerful diode-based lasers, fiber optic connectors, things like that. >> the YBCO? Actually, that's the yttrium barium copper oxide. So, we're talking about a type-2 superconductor.
Yes. But, um they had um specially pumped fiber optic lasers that could be used um very, very high electromagnetic energy fluxes. >> Okay, let me help you out. Two things. >> There was a time that >> Number Okay, so he's dropping some bombs right here. Number one, he says YBCO. You should always, in your mind, connect the letters YBCO with Ning Li and Eugene Podkletnov. How are those guys doing anti-gravity? They were spinning YBCO superconductors.
Gary Stevenson the superconducting magnetic energy storage device might be able to couple strongly with space-time if you have a high permittivity material. That high permittivity material, YBCO superconductor. Boom. Mic drop. There you go. So, YBCO potentially is one of the ways to better couple to space-time.
Remember that. And then he starts talking about the lasers. Fiber lasers. Some [ __ ] I had never heard of. It's just a I guess a fiber optic laser. So, again, a fiber optic laser is just going to be like trapped light.
And there was a guy that was just talking to Ryan Graves about these fiber lasers. Check out the last live stream on Monday and we're picking it up. Here we go. >> I had researched this incredibly carefully. My God, I think I read at least 120 papers to get this one written properly. It was my first I had no idea and the the patent attorney that Northrop Grumman provided as a matter of fact this whole thing came about a a letter of innovation came from headquarters. Think of something new that combines modern state of the art technologies and could prove disruptive in its effects.
Trust me, the secret version of this would knock you out of your socks, brother. >> Dude. Is Sal saying what I think he's saying right here? He is definitely saying what I think he's saying right here. He's saying these fiber lasers can achieve very high energy densities. He's saying these fiber lasers are basically the secret tool to manipulate space-time. And then he's saying if you saw the classified version, brother, what?
I know exactly what the classified version is, dude. Imagine that we have a laser pointer. Our fiber laser is a laser pointer. Now imagine my laser pointer is a gravity beam. Now imagine I have a laser pointer and I press the button and it's a gravity beam. How is that possible?
Because they can condition the electromagnetic beam. Specially conditioned electromagnetic beam. How big do you think the wiggler or whatever it is needs to be to turn that electromagnetic beam into a gravity beam? Tiny, chat. They can make these gravity beams as small as they can make a laser, which is really, really damn small nowadays. So, that's what Salvatore Pais is saying right here.
Yes, I'm putting words in his mouth. That's what I do, chat. He's basically saying they have a secret version of these fiber lasers that makes a gravity beam. Okay? You got it? If that's too hard for you to understand, check out Terrence Barrett.
Check out David Froning. By the way, we are going to [ __ ] on some poor science lady right now. And I you know what? I'll tell you who to blame. You blame Michael right here. He's the one.
I saw he connected his his real ID here and I guys, I'm an investigator, chat. But you know what? Michael's absolutely right on this one. Hold on. >> [snorts] >> Michael's been going hard on this science lady. I'm going to be nice. I'm not going to say any mean words about her.
I'm going to be I'm going to say some mean words, but nothing, you know, that needs to be said about her pink hair or, you know, just generally pop culture science. Turns out this woman works at the laser Wakefield accelerator. What? And of course she believes that Sunny Whites free energy microchips not real. She believes that warp drives can't be made. Where's her warp drive thing?
The problem is 0.9 We all helped make this go viral. 32,000 views on the 0.9 energy thing cuz we just destroyed her on this. She didn't know [ __ ] And she recently did one about warp drives. Which, you know what? I'm not going to lie, I didn't watch it. But doesn't understand how warp drives work either.
Chad, this is the world. Don't even let me bring this up. This is what we're dealing with. We actually have people that are anti-science that don't understand physics that are making content counter signaling people that do. It's hard to believe we've actually entered this world. But most of the science content that people are consuming is actually anti-science.
Even if you didn't believe free energy microchip was real, you should still be wanting it to be true. You should still want it to be true. But it is real, that's the benefit. And what I want people to remember is this, just one thing. We're not even going to look at her stuff right now. When it turns out that this physics is real, those people don't ever get to have credibility for the rest of their life.
Till the day they die. No, they don't get to come out and say, "Oh, I You know what? I [ __ ] all over this for many, many years claiming that it wasn't possible, claiming that the physics doesn't work, and now it actually works and I'm wrong. Oh, goofy on me." No, [ __ ] you. This is what I hate.
I hate these people that they call themselves skeptics, debunkers, whatever they call themselves, they're pieces of [ __ ] And they're holding humanity back. And it's not because of their opinion. You believe whatever you want. It's because you're ignorant and you're farming content, making people stupider. You actually don't understand the physics. I can explain it to you in 5 minutes and I don't even do physics.
It's not even my It's not even my job. I do healthcare IT. So, no excuses, no pretending like, "Oh, just got this one wrong." You were literally pushing misinformation for years, holding humanity back. That's the reality of the situation. It's like the debunkers that say, when I say I'm going to destroy their lives, and they're like, "You're so mean to me."
Um, you're literally holding humanity back. I get it. You think I'm lying about these videos or whatever. Go ahead and just assume, try to assume that maybe I'm not lying. What if I'm telling the truth and those videos are real, and you're one of these people that's been viciously attacking me for years? Your prof- your feed on social media is nothing but personal attacks against me for years straight.
How should people treat you? How would you treat you? How would you treat you? How would the current you treat the future you where it turns out you were actually just a monster and a liar and spreading disinformation? I can't even think of anything good. Being put to death is honestly a mercy.
Anyway, let's keep going. Got too sidetracked there. >> You know what? The The Navy got more than they bargained for. This started you on a path that has led to worldwide notoriety. >> I'm thinking of thinking Yeah, complete Do away with the box. No need for the box. It's a completely open system.
Let your mind truly permeate the cosmos. Remember the idea of the super intelligence? What if you were to mind melt with a super intelligence itself? You wrote a paper on this. Exactly what Hannes Alfvén truly meant when he said under conditions far from equilibrium, a plasma can and possibly shall achieve consciousness. >> Yeah. Yeah.
And this So, this is This was number one. So, let me >> A far from equilibrium plasma shall achieve consciousness. Is that true? Is that what he says? I'm going to Google this. Is that a true thing by Alfvén, Hannes, or whatever?
Hm, interesting. People are obsessed with this consciousness thing. Personally, I don't care, guys. You might say, "Asher, why don't you care?" I I don't know, man. I don't really care about the meaning of life, either.
I mean, it's just not that important to me. The The meaning of life to me is this, the fact that I'm living. But everybody seems to care about all this. I will say I'm pretty sure they're right. I'm pretty sure what Sal just said about mind melding with the cosmic intelligence. Wouldn't that explain people that seemingly like wake up with information?
There's all these instances where people suddenly know stuff they shouldn't be able to know. They learned a language they shouldn't be able to learn. They learned like physics. Like Dave Ross is an example where he says he met a blue alien, and the next thing you know is this guy is talking understands scalar physics intuitively. I wouldn't believe except I've been interact with him, and I don't understand how he knows all that stuff. Other than maybe he's like the get out, you know, body snatcher.
It's possible. Don't rule out. Anyway, point maybe there is a cosmic intelligence. Mhm. I can't rule it out. >> So now But it got my juices flowing. >> It did. Well, also guys, just real quick, if there is a cosmic intelligence isn't that proof of God?
How can there be a cosmic intelligence and it not be God? To me, I mean, look, I'm just going to throw it out there. It is God. To me, it is God. Proof of God. Absolute proof of God.
You're like, "Oh yeah, there's just this like cosmic intelligence that permeates all of space and time." Hold on, chat. Full screen. Guys, tell me if this sounds familiar to you. There is a cosmic intelligence, all-knowing, timeless cosmic intelligence permeating all space and time. Oh, yeah, that sounds a little bit like, mhm, what's that word for?
God? Oh, it sounds like God. It sounds exactly like God. This is why I'm saying physics proves God is real. >> Did. >> They came First of all, I learned how to uh how to uh how to do um a patent. How how you bring in all the uh known art and and then how you expand on it, how how you make the claims, how you write the abstract introduction and so forth, the body.
The claims are very important because that's the first thing that that a patent examiner goes to, the claims. A lot of them don't even read the art, hardly look even at the schematics. They look at the claims first. And then they consult the schematics. Some of them don't even read the body of the work, believe it or not. >> Yeah. >> Because they're trying to increase their office action rate. >> Chat, if you haven't watched, watch the interview with Tom Valone.
I'm going to try to get him back on the podcast in a week or two cuz I want to go more into this like patent examiner thing. I think being a patent examiner is so important if you want to understand the technology that's suppressed. And when you listen to Tom Valone, you realize this guy is extremely intelligent when it comes to understanding how the patent process works. What people are looking for, what he's looking for. And they are looking for these violations of violations of physics.
The reason why you bring it up is you have to realize the people that know about the technology, they also know how the patent examiners act. So when they're trying to patent something that they know is real, that they know the public doesn't know is real, they know they have to word it in a vague way. They know exactly how they have to word it so that it'll be approved. Because they don't care if people believe, they just need to get the patent approved so that they can make money selling it to Lockheed Martin or Northrop Grumman or Boeing.
They don't care how the patent gets approved. They just need it approved for legal reasons so they can make a whole bunch of money off of it. Cuz they know it's real, Northrop Grumman knows it's real. They don't care if the public In fact, they like it if the public doesn't know it's real. That's why they call it, for example, communication device. How Puthoff's 1990s patent for quantum communication is just called communications device?
What the [ __ ] Guys, that's your breakthrough technology is just called communications device? Yes. Exactly, because he knows nobody's going to question something just called communications device instead of magical communication technology that bypasses space and time. And yes, people debunked his patent and they rage on him his patent. They said it was pseudo science. And now, 25 years later, we know it's all real.
30 years later, in fact, we know it's all real. But back then, they all thought it was fake cuz they're idiots. It's funny, quantum tech was thought to be pseudo science 30 years ago and now it's the number one priority for the United States government. Number one priority. Across the board in the military, quantum technology. >> So, it's it's a bit Yeah. Let me go over to the electromagnetic field generator. >> Oh, yes.
Yes, my baby. Yes, my baby. Yes, my baby. >> Yes. Let us take a figure three. We'll talk more about figure three. It has to do with the figure >> shell. >> It has to something of this nature.
Not exactly this I have something else in mind now that would actually envelop the entirety of the main battle tank. I have a high energy electromagnetic field generating armor for tanks to basically protect the tank from top attack. And once again, the main battle tank becomes viable on the back >> Chat, he came up with a way where now it doesn't have to be a half shield. Now he found out a way where the plasma could be entirely around it now. Wow. Wow, chat.
I'm not even mad. I'm just impressed. I'm impressed. I want people to steal the technology from MH370 and incorporate it into their [ __ ] It actually brings me great joy. It brings me great joy. I'm not going to lie to you.
It's like a parent watching their child grow up. You're like, "Oh, look at this. Oh, you you've grown up and you've you've incorporated my teachings into your work. It's great. I love it." >> battlefield as the main chariot of the gods. Imagine an impregnable tank.
I call it the Caesar. Designed particular with this high energy electromagnetic field generating armor in mind. A tank of this nature not only would it be impregnable, it could once again conquer the battlefield. So, with what was meant for the tank to do in the first place, anyway. >> Bro, what are you talking about tanks, dude? Tanks? How about drones, bro?
Tanks? Why Why is my anti-gravity craft ever going to be limited to the ground? It's not. It's not. It's going to be some Jarvis orbs. And this is what I'm saying is that it's hard to tell like if I if that wasn't a black project where we're watching them teleport MH370, I would say there's no way to tell what the origin was orbs.
None at all. In fact, the only way I know that's human technology is cuz I know the the context proves that's humans doing that to humans. It may be that the geometry that's required cuz fusion's all about geometry it may be that geometry is universal. It might be that everybody's plasma orbs look the same. They might have to look all like spheres in order for the technology to work because it's all based on geometry. That may also be true for the triangles.
The reason why you see those triangles may just be a matter of geometry and that's how do you get the physics to work is geometry. So, they may the triangles may just be a matter of well, that's because that's how the physics works. And if that's the case, then how do you differentiate between our triangle geometry physics and their triangle geometry craft? Mhm. >> Yeah, so with this I mean again, you were proposing highly charged >> A swarm of drones, brother. A swarm of drones against a Caesar tank could not achieve its objectives.
That's how powerful this armor could be. >> So, this generator though >> Caesar tank? Okay, you get plus one for that. Caesar tank is a dope ass name. We're going with that. Just a great name in general. Plus it's got the double overlap.
We're going to be Julius Caesar, too. Caesar tank, make it so, chat. We're going to make the Caesar tank fly, though. We're making the tank fly. The thing is, if you have a bubble, you don't need armor anymore, either. So, it's like the moment you realize you have a You know what?
You know what? That's it. I'm just going to have to invite Sal back on. I realize I'm sitting here arguing with a dude who I is like just a phone call, text message away. Like I'm actually just going to argue with him about this in person. We're going to have to have a uh anti-gravity tank debate needs to occur. >> The The idea behind this one was to produce basically these these extraordinarily intense EM fields, right?
And if you look at the patent, it does describe spherical, hemispherical, and disc-shaped configurations, um you know, along with electrostatic generators, motors, and internal power >> We're going to call him now. I'm pretty triggered, chat. I'm pretty triggered. You think he's going to pick up? Let's find out. Speakerphone.
Hopefully he's not in the not awkward, huh? >> Hey. >> [clears throat] >> Hey, Sal. What's going on, man? >> What's up, man? >> Yo, quick qu- Yo, quick question for you. Um by the way, there's like a few hundred people watching right now, but how come your tank How come you got a anti-gravity tank with a plasma bubble that's deflecting all the ar- stuff, but you still call it like a tank? Like why does it have to drive on the ground, and why does it still need armor if you got a plasma bubble that stops everything coming in? >> Brother, control electromagnetic energy flux.
You don't have to achieve strength limit. There are other modalities. In this case, it would just be a plasma shield. >> Mhm. >> Only it get only if it gets to values like 10 to the 25, you know, 10 to the 33 W per m squared. That kind of flux would bring to a breaking of the Schwinger limit. >> But so, is this thing really a tank then or is this just like a drone, like an orb flying around in the sky? >> Oh, oh, it is a tank. I envision it as a tank.
I like this idea of of high energetic high energy field generating armor. It's a tank. >> Okay. Well, >> It could be other things as well. >> Okay. Well, I just wanted to call and say hi. We're reviewing your video right now and everybody says you're awesome in the chat. So, I just wanted to give you a shoutout, brother. >> Uh you're awesome, brother.
Thank you very much for this. Don't forget to expose. Please, don't forget me. >> Oh, of course, won't. Talk to you soon, brother. Later. >> All right. Okay.
Bye. >> Okay, a little live calling chat. We've never done one of those before. That's why I decided to do it. I kind of forget. I don't got I don't I don't feed you guys enough. I got to feed y'all the content.
I forgot I used to be a casual Andy viewer and now I'm a Chad streamer and I got to give back to the people. They want impromptu [ __ ] There you go. Boom. >> This is Now, you mentioned using this >> way, Salvatore Everyone says Salvatore Pais is hard to get a hold of get a hold of and I just called him in the middle of a live stream impromptu, no warning. Anyway, going on. >> to protect a tank and like armored vehicles.
Was that kind of the intent in mind when you first came up with this? >> I wanted to protect the Earth from asteroids. See, the whole idea it truly bothered me that you would have to send a probe years before that asteroid would even be on the path to impacting Earth. >> Yeah. >> "Could I design something that could deflect this more readily? Impart such high electromagnetic energy flux."
This is before I understood that if you create enough energy densities within a localized uh locality of space-time, you could actually create, quote unquote, the breaking of the Schwinger limit, thereby creating a possible black hole. >> Yeah. >> A singularity, on quote unquote, even though I don't truly believe in that terminology. It doesn't actually go to zero. It goes to the Ashworth bound point. Hence, remember all the stuff you wrote about super force, super density, super intelligence. But anyway, >> Sal saying right there that you make a black hole, it doesn't go to zero. It doesn't get annihilated.
I think what he's saying there is that if you if something disappears over here, it's got to reappear somewhere else. Like we have to observe conservation. Funny enough, free energy obeys conservation of energy, believe it or not. Because free energy is just another reservoir that we're tapping into. So, it's like we just don't notice there's energy there. We don't notice this balloon is already filled up.
If the balloon's filled up, we just have to push the air out of the balloon, and we get free push. Or if the if the air leaks, whatever. So, um crap. Lost my other train of thought. Anyway, I'll come back to me. Here we go. >> Well, I'm digressing.
So, let's go back to the case in point. The whole idea is that if you bring this high um high energy electromagnetic field generator close to the asteroid, you're able to deflect it with extremely high electromagnetic field focused on a certain locality. If you just say the asteroid is I don't know, one one angle Well, that's a a couple of thousand miles away from Earth. Let's say that. I was about to I was about to give a a very unusual uh um fact of distance but that would I mean it would defy the purpose of this idea.
So the whole idea is you'll be able to deflect it just by having it say right with it right with the asteroid and focusing this electromagnetic energy flux on a on a particular point if you are just able to do a couple of centimeters. If it's so far away from Earth boom. >> Yes. Yes. >> It will never hit it. So yeah. >> Yeah, no bad actually. You know this is interesting because true story here.
I read Sal's patents papers back in 2018 2017 whenever they came out and I didn't understand the physics but from a layman's understanding yeah it seemed like it would be plausible. The thing that was so impressive to me was that exactly what he said there. He says in the paper in his high frequency gravity wave paper that you could annihilate an asteroid with this or planetoid it says specifically. And I remember thinking holy crap somebody figured out a way where asteroids are just a non-factor.
Like we have all these movies in the 90s about asteroids wiping out Earth and we feel like we're this helpless ball speck and if any asteroid were to hit us it was going to be game over. I was even convinced we were going to get hit by an asteroid in my lifetime and it would be game over. And then Sal rolls up and says nah. Sal rolls up and says nah we can just wipe them out. And I'm like wow that's incredible. And it wasn't until I saw the MH370 videos where I realized exactly what he's talking about.
Because you realize if you have that technology asteroids are no threat whatsoever. No threat whatsoever. I mean you don't even need to annihilate the asteroid. You just have to change its course a little bit. If you have full-on gravity manipulation technology, that's not issue. So, if we end up getting hit by an asteroid, that is a false flag.
People like to say talk about false flags, 9/11's a false flag, that this the thing and that thing are a false flag. If we get hit by an asteroid, it's a legit false flag. Any asteroid that hits anywhere in this world, the United States let it happen. We let it happen 100%. >> [laughter] >> That in itself is an incredibly interesting idea. >> in mind Apophis, which at the time uh was said if it goes for a certain keyhole, I believe it was in 204, um I could be wrong. Anyway, it was in the 20s.
Uh um uh 20, you know, um in the 2020s, I believe. Then it >> Uh Sal, I'll help you out. 2029 and 2037, I believe are the years that Apophis is supposed to come very close. It was actually in 2037 or 2036, it comes very close. Apophis comes closer than any asteroid has ever come of its size. It comes within our geostationary satellites.
Okay? Geostationary satellites are about 40,000 km away, and Apophis is going to come closer than that. And if they're off by even 1 or 2%, then it can hit us straight on. If they're off by just 1 or 2%. Those aren't odds that Yes, it's a small percent. I don't like those percentages.
The good news is I know we have space-time manipulation technology, so there's absolutely no way in hell we should be getting hit by Apophis. So, specifically, if I get hit by Apophis, like I'm driving on the street and the freaking asteroid hits me, chat, you know the CIA did that [ __ ] Look, I'm I'm talking to the future right now. If that [ __ ] happens to me, that was no accident. They can control space time. Meteorites and asteroids don't randomly hit Ashton Forbes, okay? Just want to be clear about that.
Yeah, save Lulu chat. >> It would most likely part of it would impact in 2029, otherwise in 2036 for sure. And have you noticed almost nothing, nothing is being written about Apophis lately? Which truly has me a little apprehensive, especially since the uh billionaires have started to build bunkers. >> Well, so let me if it's okay, let me break down that for for anybody in the audience who have been following this thing. >> Okay, well, we already broke it down. Let's keep going. >> I've seen photos of these patent images. They've been floating around Instagram, floating around Facebook.
They pop up on Twitter all the time. They're used everywhere. This invention inspired people. So, what can you tell me about it? >> Yeah, people that said they actually saw the craft. It's it's my most viral one. For some reason, there was a I forget um I think it was a Professor Simon that did one that was a couple of mil. >> Yeah. >> In the beginning, uh it it really went viral.
He He's a great um He's very good friend >> crack me up how much they're like I don't know. Something about their understanding of social media. Like they just get so excited. Oh, got it. Did a couple million views. Like I guess for me it's just like I don't know.
It's kind of like in poker you got to not care about the money if you want to win at poker. It's like in social media you got to not care about the views if you want to win at at social media. You got to just do your own thing, not be audience captured. But I am happy for Sal. And I'm happy that his stuff has gotten more views. And the reason why I promote is cuz it's true number one.
And number two, this is I mean people this is what people ask for. Like they say, "Hey, give me two videos in perfect synchronization of some UFOs." And I say, "Here you go." And it's also military. And they go, "No, that's fake. That's visual effects."
Like, "Okay, fine. You're retarded." And it's like, "Okay, give me proof. If if this technology was real, there'd be patents for it." Okay, here's like five patents here. No, if that was real, he would be he would be like working for the government.
He does, he works for the Navy. Okay, but if he was if he was legit though, the defense contractors would have He did, he worked for special projects in Northrop Grumman. It's like, oh. Yeah. Right? This is what they all ask for.
And then when you get it, they're like, oh, I >> Explanation, very much alongside just like Ashton and Forbes, taking of those three orbs. >> Hey, hey, hey. That's me, chat. Look at that, right on cue. I didn't even know he was going to say that. >> That could take that asteroid out of commission.
But anyway, yeah, so um You know, >> Will that [ __ ] happen? >> you that the idea was what I I got the idea from watching the Imperial Raider, was it in in in Star Wars? >> Oh. >> remember >> Um okay. >> Do you remember uh Darth Vader's >> Yeah, yeah, the the flagship. >> Not the flagship. >> The flagships, the flagships. All of a sudden, you'd hear this incredible hum. And the thing would just disappear into what we understand now as being the condition vacuum, [clears throat] ala Herman David Froning, ala Paul Murad, had so many so many greats came before this.
I mean >> How funny is it that it's just actually Star Wars? Star Wars is actually correct. Now guys, I don't give a [ __ ] what physics is the true physics or not. I also don't give a [ __ ] what happened to the plane, it just happened to be teleported. It is what it is. But isn't it damn weird that Star Trek and Star Wars both ended up being correct on how basically alien physics ends up working?
I mean, what are the odds that these science fiction shows get the physics exactly correct? Like, yep, you really do jump through hyperspace and then reappear on the other side, like Huh, how do you know that? >> [laughter] >> I mean, truly, we stand on the shoulder of giants. People that took the mainstream community of physicists and engineers on. And and and even though a lot of them were called pseudo-scientists and and crackpots and charlatans and so forth, they stood their ground. Names like Paul Murad, names like Herman David Froning. Names like um Why not you?
Tim Ventura. You did so much on the flyer. It's true. >> Well, I appreciate it. I I don't know if I would have thought of that at the time. But the physics of You know, this is something that I only vaguely knew, but I didn't really know that much about Tim Ventura. Learned a little bit more last weekend.
You're going to see on Saturday. But he spent a ton of effort and time researching and investigating the Graviflyer. The Thomas Townsend Brown effect. So that was how his intro to this whole thing began is that in the '90s, he did a big anti-gravity like documentary TV show thing on the Graviflyer showing that these electrogravitic effects were real. Cool. >> The um electrostatic levitator, it was really thought of as possibly a gravitational disruption field that ensued before we understood ionic. And still, I'll tell you the truth, under certain circumstances, it might not be ionic heating that's doing that's performing that mechanism.
So let's just leave it there. Yeah. >> Well, so in this one, you've got microwave emitters in it. You've got a resonant cavity. Um you're using noble gases. What are some of the mechanisms that you envisioned in terms of lift here? >> It's not uh truly lift. It's more of how do I get Remember how the Imperial Raider would just vanish into quote-unquote the condition. >> It's not lift.
Isn't that exactly it? That's [snorts] exactly how people are misunderstanding it. They say, "Well, how are you getting the lift?" Well, let me show you a video, guys, to help you understand this from my normies that are out there. I want you to tell me if what I'm about to show you is anti-gravity. Okay?
You tell me if this Veritasium video is anti-gravity, okay? This is a like 40-lb flywheel. So, 40 lbs is a lot of weight. It's so much weight that you most likely cannot lift it over your head with one hand unless you're pretty built, pretty jacked, unless you're super jacked. So, let's watch this guy just lift it over his head with ease. >> Release my left hand and holding only with my right hand at the end of the shaft, I'll try to lift it up over my head. This is a 40-lb, 19-kg flywheel.
Ready? Here we go. Three, two, one. Beautiful. Let's go again. In three, two, one. >> Not only is he lifting it over his head, he's lifting it over his head parallel, which is the hardest possible way as opposed to lifting it straight up like this.
He's lifting it sideways like this with no effort. Is that anti-gravity? I think a lot of people would say, "No." They would say, "No, that's not anti-gravity. That's just like you know, normal um uh right-hand rule in in physics." And I'd say, "Well, what if we're just looking at anti-gravity the wrong way? I mean, from a practical perspective, that's anti-gravity.
From a practical perspective, that wheel is lighter. And you would say, if you disagree, I'd say, "Well, you try to lift that up." Try to lift that up without the wheel spinning, and good luck. You're never going to be able to do that. I mean, maybe you can, but you get the point. So, is it precession producing anti-gravity?
What Sal is saying here is that we're not we don't need to try to change the physics that we have. We need to look at the problem differently. What we're doing is we're not changing the actual mass of the object, we're changing the space-time around it. We're not actually making the object lighter, we're just making things move towards up. We're making their paths forward in time move towards up. Hm.
Oops. Can vacuum. >> Yeah. >> Remember that especially the writing of Herman David Froning, how he describes there's a great AIAA paper in which he truly describes how this would occur. To us, this thing would become invisible. It would no longer be there because it's now no longer within our frame of reference. >> Okay. >> However, just remember, what does plasma do when oscillated at certain frequencies? I will not say more, but I refer you to my equation. >> Okay, we're paying attention. What does plasma do when oscillated at certain frequencies?
Writing it down. I will not say more. Okay, chat, that's some felony physics [ __ ] chat. We're talking about that on Friday. What do you guys think the answer is? Hm.
I think he's speaking to oscillating plasma bringing down the Schwinger limit. And I think we're about to find in the papers that are coming out, including that Blake feed Wakefield accelerator, that all this resonating oscillating plasma, they're going to have a major breakthrough where they're going to find space-time manipulation. And I'm going to go, I told you so, because I'm from the future, duh.
How else could I know all that? >> And the equation one of the I would say the most important equations of the pi society >> 789 >> S max, so basically the magnitude of the pointing vector maximum times the order of >> Okay, so pointing vector. Remember pointing vector. I just mentioned the pointing vector in regards to the rare task in video. That's the That's how they explain where that force is coming from this anti-gravity. They say it's just the pointing vector. Okay. >> Sigma sub S, surface charge density divide to the squared, so to the second power divided by epsilon sub zero.
Epsilon sub zero, remember it's the permittivity. >> Permittivity. >> Right? Um the permittivity of free space. So it's on the order of 10 to the minus 11. It's on the bottom, so okay. Now, uh the R sub omega times omega squared times TOP. That's one of the equations that's almost in all my papers, including the one that I refer to most because in my opinion it's incredibly important.
I was able to publish an IEEE transaction on plasma science 2019. The paper was entitled or rather titled um plasma compression fusion device. Okay. Nuclear thermonuclear or rather nuclear fusion at ignition temperatures. A serve a self-burning plasma. So we're talking about very high Qs.
Now, >> Dude, what in the [ __ ] is he talking about right here? He's just randomly talking about ignition fusion with high Q factor over unity. And so the equations that he just listed off, he says, on one side you have surface charge density. So you imagine, what is surface charge density? Imagine electrostatic charge. So right now my hair is normal, right?
But if I take this, that right there. See my hair sticking up? I don't The surface charge density would be if you're building up a bunch of electrons onto this. Same exact idea. So Sal's saying if you can build up a whole bunch of charge, that's going to have one side I think we that's one side of the equation. And then on the other, or no, maybe it's the surface the charge times the frequency divided by the permittivity.
So permittivity, if we can change the permittivity, we can change we can vastly change this number. And if we can change the frequency, we can also vastly change the outcome of this. This is why increasing the frequency makes this number go big, or decreasing the permittivity also makes that number go big. >> Under certain vibration could have frequencies, I won't say more than that because then again, we're not here to educate and enable the enemy, especially nowadays. >> Robert Flint. >> They can get some ideas out of this truly fascinating, which is another pet peeve of mine.
If they do not have this disruptive technology that I'm referring to, why are they not giving me a lab and a team to prove that this is real? Anyway, just >> What do you Now, do you do you think I mean, I I guess that would be a And actually I have this as a later slide in the back, but >> So that's really big and what I think it was that Gerald in the chat saying that the reason why fusion is so important is cuz you need huge energy density to manipulate space-time. That's undeniable from Einstein. That's why we need fusion.
Fusion has the highest energy densities. So, that's why when you're looking for a zero point energy tap, you're looking for a fusion reactor. That's why plasma's connected to this. Nobody had put these pieces together before, but now we are. And Sal said right there, he said, "If this isn't real, why aren't they giving me a lab to test it?" If I don't know, he says, "If they don't already have this, why aren't they giving me a lab to test it?"
Sal's being pretty clear here. He's saying Jay Stratton, Hal Puthoff, those guys already built this for the government. They don't They're not interested in being publicly discovered. In fact, they've been covering it up publicly so that it doesn't get discovered while they're pretending to be the investigators. Hal Puthoff and um Jay Stratton and Eric They're all doing a big LARP. They're all actors putting on a show.
And they're going, "We're trying to figure out what's going on with the UFOs." Meanwhile, they're literally building teleportation technology for the government. There's no bigger LARP than that. Okay? And that's the reason why they showed up to Sal. That's the reason why they shut down his project.
Cuz they know he's he's right. They know he's right, and they want to make sure that he doesn't get proven. >> Do you think that some of these patent ideas have been taken and developed into working technologies? >> Yes. >> I would not say these in particular. I would say that we've had some of this technology since the 1950s. Remember the whole idea um Yes. >> At the time, you didn't find the G engines are coming. And all of a sudden, complete silence, especially from mainstream physics. When you have people like Wheeler, Cecil, DeWitt, and her great husband, Bryce DeWitt.
We're talking some of the top physicists. Many of them have worked in the Manhattan Project. >> Yeah. >> I truly believe those are Manhattan Project for what we understand today as UAPs what truly is unacknowledged effort objects. >> Dude, >> That's just what it is. >> crazy right now. >> Yeah. And I truly believe we You know, this whole idea is that we reverse engineer this from existing I'm not saying it is quite possible we did both. But I think this was our interpretation of the physics.
We achieved it via electromagnetic means. >> Mhm. >> Remember the great Theodore Kaluza? >> This is what's so crazy though is that they've been hiding this for decades, dude. They haven't just been hiding this for like 10 or 20 years. When we watch the MH370 videos, people are like, "Why are they testing this on an airplane?" >> [gasps] >> Why they Why are they testing those orbs on this poor chungus airplane, this wholesome chungus airplane? And you go, "Bro, you think they're testing teleportation orbs on an airplane?" That's not a test, my dude.
They The only way they can even have this technology is if they've been hiding this [ __ ] for a long time, dude. And successfully, very successfully. Because it means they've been having breakthroughs in their Department of Energy labs. And somehow they've been able to keep it quiet. Like they've been having Nobel Prize-winning breakthroughs, and the people that are doing it know it is, and they they're just classifying it. Imagine you're one of these engineers, and you know you just just got a Nobel Prize right there, but you can't reveal it because it's classified.
Think about that. Some of them, like Hal Puthoff, don't care. Believe me or don't believe me, Hal Puthoff does not care about winning a Nobel Prize. Hal Puthoff's mission and goals these people have basically like a an ethos that they live by that's above everything else in the world for to them. >> Before Klein came in and made it all microscopic. What happens in the so-called quote-unquote fifth dimension? But anyway, >> Yeah, Kaluza Klein cited >> still cited all the time.
All the >> I like that we're influencing Sal like we are essentially >> South Park. >> Back in the day you couldn't even say [ __ ] on television. Believe it or not you couldn't even say [ __ ] on television back in the '90s. It would be bleeped. And then South Park did a whole episode where they said [ __ ] like 120 times or something like that, maybe even more. And they've pushed the boundaries on censorship. And we have pushed the boundaries on physics.
No one would have talked about the fifth dimension in a serious conversation, zero-point energy. And now Sal's out here saying the orbs are real, there's an extra dimension, Kaluza Klein's real. And it's not that he didn't know this stuff. It's just that he wouldn't have been as he unafraid to say it. He's not afraid to say it now because he knows there's an army of people behind him promoting his physics, agreeing with him. Before he could have easily been ostracized by everybody forever.
But now he's like, "Hey, we got Ashton Forbes who's just going to rip you to shreds if you come after me." And it's true, I will. It's 100% true. >> Time. >> Of course, but not Klein. I'm saying look at Kaluza's >> Kaluza's okay. >> before Klein got in on the act. >> Speaking of which, pink hair girl, whatever her name is, Abigail James, what's her something like that? Pink hair girl, go ahead. I dare you, pink hair girl.
Try to do your own little live stream review of this. I would love to hear your thoughts. I'll watch. I'll watch. I want to hear the Wakefield accelerator plasma girl's opinion on how this physics doesn't isn't real or whatever she's going to say. >> And basically made it mainstream physics feasible. I am talking about Jessica Kaluza himself.
Remember when Einstein actually looked at Kaluza's theories? Read carefully what Einstein wrote back. >> Okay. >> Anyway. Okay. >> Yeah. >> I will do some research. That I am not familiar with. >> Please. Please do. >> I'm going to I'm going >> Okay. What did Einstein say?
I mean, come on, man. Help us out here, bro. You're dropping bombs. What did Einstein say about Kaluza-Klein Klein theory? Okay. Einstein said he was initially ecstatic and supportive when Theodor Kaluza first sent him the five-dimensional unified theory in 1919.
Helping present Okay, let's just here. Read it along together, chat. Ooh. Little history. Helped present Kaluza's paper to the Prussian Academy of Scientists. Over the decades, his stance shifted and he and the collaborators ran into significant roadblocks.
So, Einstein was a huge proponent of Kaluza-Klein. Wow, look at this. Look at what you learn, chat. I'm telling you. People have just they retconned history. They retconned the ether away.
The ether has always been real. And libtards and other assorted communists basically just retconned it away. And now they've made the ether into a bad word where you're not even allowed to say it. Meanwhile, it's actually real physics and it was always real and even their heroes, Einstein, even believed in it. That's what's crazy. And then they'll be like, "No, he didn't I He's the one that He's the one that said we don't need that."
It's like, "Yes, he no. It's the opposite." Einstein's the one that predicted gravitational waves. You need a medium. Amazing. He encouraged Kaluza to publish champion of the idea. And 5 years later, he's out here working on a five-dimensional theory to produce singularity free solutions.
What is a singularity free solution? That would mean that your black hole has a white hole. No singularity. That would mean that nothing actually compresses down to nothing. That's not possible. So, that would mean that a black hole would have to have a white hole where something comes out the other side.
And this is probably one of the biggest revelations of MH370. Is that we watch an airplane disappear. How do I know it's teleportation? That's a good question to ask. How do I know that's teleportation? For the exact same reason as right here.
Plane can't just disappear to zero. Has to go somewhere else. Has to go somewhere else. There is no disappearing to zero. There is no true singularities. Hm.
Pretty interesting. >> [clears throat] >> And also, just from a evidence standpoint, they found pieces of the plane. I don't believe those pieces of the plane were planted. I think it would be insane to plant pieces of a plane on African coast that you're trying to say the plane crashed in the South Indian Ocean. If you're going to plant pieces of the plane, you would plant them in in Australia where people are expecting the debris to show up.
You just like literally could just drop some on the ground and then it would float up there and people would like, "Oh, look at this MH370 debris washed ashore." So, no. I think the debris in Africa really is MH370. And that means that plane showed up somewhere else. That means even if it disappeared, even if they teleported, it showed up somewhere else. And not 10 years later, like pretty soon. Anyway.
Okay. So, Einstein promoted Kaluza Klein. Fun little detail. I knew Einstein was a G chat. By the way, a lot of people doubted Einstein, including all the flat-earthers, and they peer-pressured me to try to renounce Einstein. I have never once renounced Einstein ever, chat.
Not once, not ever, because Einstein Einstein messes with time, chat. And that's how we roll. He's a true G. Here we go. Wait, what? Hello.
Uh oh. Don't worry, I have it. Wait for it. Here it is. >> The guy, huh? That's him. >> Wait, wait, wait. >> The guy, huh? That's him.
Hey, man. Remember me? I got something for your ass. What the [ __ ] Don't [ __ ] with with time. YOU DON'T [ __ ] NO. WITH TIME, [ __ ] >> CHAT, this is a documentary, by the way. >> [clears throat] >> This is what happened. The aliens came back in time, and they beat up Einstein.
And he got super pissed off, dude. And so, he just wrote the whole theory of general relativity, just like that. >> I will mess with time. I will mess with time. >> So, that's the guy, huh? >> I Let it be known, Ashton Forbes never turned on the goat. Never once. He said Einstein and Tesla can live together in a nice happy family. I will hear no blasphemy.
No blasphemy to the goat, chat. >> Kaluza-Klein basically brought it into the mainstream, made it you know, eventually of course the Kaluza-Klein manifolds and all that. We're not talking about microscopic dimensions. We're talking about macroscopic dimensions ala Eric Davis. The idea that it's possible on the order of 10 to the minus 4 meters to have such a dimension. That's no longer microscopic. >> So one of the other takeaways that I have >> Eric Davis says you can have a macroscopic extra dimension? I didn't know that.
Okay. >> here. I mean, you've mentioned like 2019 paper, you've mentioned other papers. So again, this is an incredibly viral patent. The images have been all over everywhere, but if folks research your work, they're going to find more extensive references. >> environment, the medium around the craft so as to permit the craft to propel forwards. >> Okay. >> Yes. Yeah, the idea of Hermann David Fröning, namely the modification of the condition vacuum. >> Yeah. >> Chat, we're just saying it out loud. We're just saying it out loud, chat.
Hermann David Fröning. The holy book, chat. Oh M G's. I can't believe we actually able to pinpoint down to a single book by which you can find the physics that they're hiding. It's got literal graphics in it for how faster than light time manipulation would look mirroring air flow and supersonic flow. Actually crazy.
Even talks about the aerospace plane where they were trying to incorporate fusion into their into their thing. Unbelievable, man. Unbelievable. >> And >> You can do it this way. Of course, once you to the Schwinger limit, that's all you need, but you need extremely high energy densities to do that. Again, feasible. >> I know I I I love it. So, I would describe that I mean, the usual word that folks use is warp drive, right?
I've been seeing that all over the place lately. I would say space fold. Would that Would that fit better? >> I like uh Froning's interpretation, the modification or rather the conditioning of the vacuum itself. >> Okay. Okay. >> Look carefully at them. >> I knew Sal always says there's just conditional possibilities. That's how you know he's the biggest David Froning fanboy. David Froning's whole thing is specially conditioned electromagnetic beams are what creates a gravity wave.
He says specially conditioned EM beams like a thousand times in this book. That's his whole verbage. And Sal has adopted his entire exact verbage. Not a not a surprise, man. And this is what Sal's saying. He's saying they're manipulating the space time.
Stop thinking about it like you're modifying the weight of the object. You're just changing the path of the object, therefore it seems like it's lighter. That big 40-lb flywheel didn't change its weight. It didn't get lighter. It's just doing a gravitational manipulation effect of space time to appear lighter. Which is functionally the same thing.
This is why when people say, "No, space time manipulation is not possible. You can't change laws of physics." You're you're watching it happen with a a spinning wheel. You're seeing it with your eyes. The exact effect that you're claiming is impossible. And you say, "Well, that's just normal physics."
Exactly. It's just normal physics. You just don't understand normal physics. >> Second law of thermodynamics, you can actually write it write the thing, and you'll see that under certain conditions what I'm talking about, it gives rise to negative energy densities. What are negative energy densities? An energy density is a pressure. A negative A negative pressure is what?
It's a suction pressure. It sucks the craft within the condition vacuum. >> Oh. Pink-haired girl didn't understand. I saw the back and forth between Michael and the pink-haired girl uh when I was doxing him and she didn't understand that negative pressure is negative energy. She's like, "Negative pressure isn't negative energy. It's a different thing."
It's like, "How the [ __ ] would you know? You don't even know what negative energy is. You can't even define negative energy." I I don't know what it is, but I know it's not negative pressure. Why? Uh tell me the Tell me the units.
Go ahead and just tell me what the units are for gravity. Oh, it's the same as pressure. Huh, weird. Why are the units for gravity and pressure the same then? Just a coincidence? Jesus, chat.
This is what I'm saying. We honestly have to draw it in crayon for some of these people. The people that we considered actually be the smartest most credible scientists are some of the dumbest people on Earth that we have to draw [ __ ] in crayon for them to get it. What a world we live in. It's an inverted ass world where healthcare IT consultants teach plasma wakefield accelerator physics physicists how physics works. By the way, if this upsets you, nobody's more upset by this than me, okay?
You think I enjoy having to correct world-class physicists on how physics works? I mean, I do kind of enjoy it. I'm not going to lie. I do kind of enjoy it, actually. But it's not what I want for my life. >> Okay. Okay.
Okay. >> You see the second configuration? Does that remind you a little bit of something? >> The second configuration in the patent? >> Yeah, not the triangular craft, the other one. Basically two triangles put together. >> Yeah, I was going to say I I I almost thought that was a side view, but then it says alternate embodiment, so that wouldn't be a side view, right? That would be >> Not necessarily. >> Yeah. >> Yeah. >> Yeah, no, I I'm not sure. It It reminds me of something, but I'm not My brain isn't tracking.
Where Where What should it remind me of? >> I've seen this recently. They went through a couple of geometries with that were observed out there. >> Oh, oh, okay. Okay, so UAPs. >> And this was one of them. Yeah, UFOs. Let's call them what they are. Why Why try to change history, you know?
Cuz the whole idea of UAPs they they You can't do away with more than 70 years of history. Actually, a lot more, cuz if you think of all the all the paintings, all the medieval paintings that you see some of these objects in. >> Yeah, the the wheel of Ezekiel. I mean, that's biblical, right? >> forget, right, the book of Enoch, how he described some of the craft, quote unquote, the angels rode in and so forth, anyway. And of course, the wheel of of his >> By the way, it's all just geometry. It's actually not like an esoteric thing.
It's actually just really all just geometry. Fu- Fusion is all just geometry. All the fusion reactors are geometry. Just check them out. Even field reversed configuration, geometry once again. Uh So, when you when when Sal's like, "Oh, I'm just putting triangles together."
It almost seems comical, right? It seems like a kindergartner thing, like you're just building triangles together. Yep. It's what you do. It's how you do this. And when I say, what what do you think they're doing when they're doing a specially conditioned electromagnetic beam?
So, you have an electromagnetic beam just a wave. There's not much you can do to just a wave. You can break it apart, you can twist it. It's all just geometry as well. So, even the specially conditioned electromagnetic beam just changing the geometry of an electromagnetic beam of light. That's it.
Turning into a gravity beam. >> I think you're correct. Yeah. >> So, let me go to the high frequency gravitational wave generator. This has also been viral and I think it's you know those sharp wedges in this they catch the eye, right? So, what does this do and what inspired you to come up with this patent? >> The whole idea was this the engineering of something called the Gerchstein effect. Circa 1960s >> Dude. >> Russian physicist Gerchstein >> The Gerchstein effect? Okay, chat.
Put this in your memories. Gerchstein effect. I'm going to say it again. I'm going to say it like five times. Gerchstein effect. You're about to see an interview with Tim Ventura and myself where we specifically go over all this about how Gary Stevenson went with Bob Baker when he got called up about his high frequency gravitational wave and sharing it with China.
And the CIA and Round Pandolfi put him on tribunal. And get and Tim Ventura was downplaying this in the interview and I'm going, "Dude, why would they why would they write him up if it's not a big deal? Like, if this doesn't work if this doesn't work, then why are they writing him up for telling the Chinese about it?" And they claimed that the reason why he got off Bob Baker got off cuz they claimed, "Oh, the effect is too small so it's not a national security issue." They basically just gave him a a hand slap.
And Gary Stevenson argued was real the anti-gravity effect and he said it was the Gerchstein effect that was allowing it to happen. Gary Stevenson said that and now you're listening to Salvatore Pais talking about that exact same effect making his gravity wave generator. Honestly, we're at the point here where it's like I play back what I just said the last two minutes what I just said and I'm going, "How are people so [ __ ] they don't get this? All these people are saying the exact same physics to do the exact same thing, which is to make a gravity beam.
It's clearly the thing they're all saying in unison. Sometimes I wonder if I'm in the Truman Show and you're all fake and I'm just like you're waiting for me to like break through the barrier or something, like break through the back wall. They're like, "Oh, Ashton found out he's in the show. This is all fake." >> I realized that it is possible using a very strong magnetic field. Once you have certain electromagnet energy fluxes going through it, it's possible to generate high-frequency gravitational waves. It It's truly an amazing character.
But I I refuse to believe that the Soviets, or rather the Russians under any form of government, the Russians are Russian. I refuse to believe the Russians um did not investigate the Gerstein effect further. It is a remarkable physical phenomenon. Even though theoretically in nature, I'm pretty sure they did experiments on it. >> You know, the the other group that's been doing a lot of research on this is in China. And Dr. Robert Baker Jr. had worked with them. So, I would imagine they would have investigated it as well. >> He just He just name-dropped Robert Baker.
That was Bob Baker, the guy I just mentioned. He just goes, "Oh, he just did a whole bunch of work on this was Robert Baker." Yeah, Robert M. L. Baker, exactly. Bob Baker.
This is why I'm sitting here going, "Dude, how have people not figured this out, man? They're saying it openly, dude." >> This guy got written up by Ron Pandolphi of the CIA. Ron Pandolphi is a monster. If he's coming after you, you are saying some [ __ ] >> The Chinese are some of the most um Presently, in my opinion, they truly have um Let's just say, they have us by the balls. I'll tell you the truth. They're incredible scientists and technologists, engineers.
You got to understand, out of my graduating class at Case Western Reserve University, we're talking about the doctoral level. Um 20 out of the 25 students were of Chinese. I'm talking about mainland China. Two of them were um from India, and there was me and I believe one other that was uh >> We got We got to speed up or we're not going to finish this whole thing. >> nothing. They're unstoppable. >> Yeah, unstoppable. Really wonderful that you're keeping that alive.
You're saying, "Hey guys, take a look at this. There is something here." >> tremendous. I mean, these people must not be forgotten. They're all pioneers. Well, one day their their song will be known. Their songs will be sung.
Again, Nikola Tesla. >> Hell yeah, chat. It's time for another clip. That's what I like to hear. These people will be known. Their songs will be sung, chat. Makes me think about this clip every time. >> Um all these noble lords.
Can't even remember his name. His name was Sir Arlan of Pennytree. And I am his legacy. On the morrow we will show them what his hand has wrought. >> Woo boy. Oh, chat. When that played in real time, woo, you get the chills.
His name was Herman David Froning. And we are his legacy. And we will show them on the morrow what his training has wrought, chat. We will show them all, chat. We will show them all. Uh I love it because that's exactly what we're doing.
A bunch of people have just dismissed legit engineers and scientists that solved that are so much more acclaimed than they think they are, they have dismissed them, forgotten them, not given them their rightful place. And we're going to show them. We're going to show them. Wow. Okay. >> One of the colossus of our truly technological age.
If it wasn't for him and hardly any any do you see great statues of the man? >> Yeah. >> He should be held in There should be a colossus of wrote a paper written I I I ask your followers, I ask everybody that's watching this pod to please refer to a great gentleman. I'm not sure if he was of Ukrainian origin or Russian. His name was Victor. >> Victor Lakno. Watch. Didn't even watch this yet. >> Victor Lakno, last name >> Psychic powers. I told you. From the damn future chat.
How do I know for real though? Because this is the room temperature superconductor and Sal says the way you increase the the critical temperature is through vibration and Victor Lakno's paper basically says that vibration frequency can help uh increase critical temperature of superconductivity. We're trying to make the super the critical temperature of superconductivity very high. That way we don't need to cool our superconductor anymore. And if we don't need to cool our superconductor, you can get levitation at room temperature. You can have levitating rocks.
Can you imagine a levitating rock like an avatar? Well, you can if you have a room temperature superconductor. >> L A K H N O. Victor first name. Victor >> Yeah, I want to listen to the AI part. So we're going to skip that a little bit. >> Anyway, one of them has a helical coil around it and the other one only has the single layer configuration. What what does the coil do?
The the the regular single layer config >> to read the Victor Lakno paper. He truly describes the mechanism to a T. In my He basically says quote unquote "Baise" generates this let's call it a condensate, but truly he's talking about a Bose-Einstein condensate, but at room temperature. And then by having an alternating magnetic field, he moves it. >> Ah, okay. >> whole idea. Because once you're able to pair the electrons, once the the the the quote unquote um He has a theory of cold or bipolarons. You have to read this paper.
Read this paper, it's only three pages long. >> So, Sal's saying that these plasma orbs are actually Bose-Einstein condensates that are superconducting at room temperature, and all they have to do is move around the electromagnetic magnetic fields and they can propel themselves. Why? Well, the same reason why the flywheel. Why does the flywheel have anti-gravity effects? Well, you can do the same thing with just a ball plasma by controlling the plasma moving around on the inside. That's it's all they're doing. >> It's remarkably written.
That's a matter >> I would say is if you want proof of this, you should look at the orbs. Unfortunately, the MH370 videos don't show us all the orbs at the same time in a lot of the frames. We have a really good videos of a plane being teleported, but we would really need to see the heat signatures in multiple orbs because we want to know are they all locked together the whole time or are they moving and spinning independently?
Cuz I think what you're going to find is there is con- there's a specific pattern to their movement, and it's what's driving them flying forward or in spinning or whatever direction that they're going. >> I think he used it as the basis for his book later on high temperature superconductivity. The man will one day win a Nobel Prize for actually having the theory of room temperature superconductivity. And whoever does this experiment and gets it right >> Where's the AI thing? >> How How should I say? We >> You know what?
Now Now that you mention that, let me let me see if I can get him to do a this is an active room temperature superconductor. This has nothing to do with the materials as long as the materials are also uh super conducting even at very low temperatures. We're talking about 4° Kelvin. 4° absolute zero. So we're talking about helium, liquid helium. temperatures. That's why I use a PZT coating because lead zirconium and titanate, they're all superconductors. >> Okay, he's about to talk to it.
Here we go. >> But that's key. They have to have their inherent nature has to be one that leads to superconductivity. It doesn't matter how low as long as that inherent effect of superconductivity is already in them. That's also key. Another key to this the >> So if the material has superconducting properties, then you can use this to increase the temperature. Basically.
Thank you, Sal. Have a good one, brother. Or or uh ma'am. I don't know if you're a man or a woman. But here's the point. He's saying any material that has the capability for inherent superconductivity, you can increase the critical temperature on it.
That's pretty huge. That's a huge claim. >> substrate or rather the the let's call it a laminate or if you want to something by vapor deposition, the thin layer of um that's put say on on the insulator there's a thin layer of let's call it a conductor. In that case it would be PZT. The whole idea is that this thing would vibrate with once you pulse a current through it. Pulsing current is necessary how? Because you're truly accelerating.
Remember how you accelerate the vibration? You pulse a current. Anyway, so um that's beside the point. But >> There's Sal basically saying the secret sauce to how do you accelerate or spin? He says vibration and spin are the secret. And he's saying, "How do you convert that into engineering?"
You pulse pulse a current, same thing. Pulsing something is the same as vibrating. That's why pulsed power is so significant. >> I'm trying Yes, the the the thickness of the conduction layer on top of the insulator, that would have to be on the order of the London penetration depth.
And I actually go into the physics of it in an AIAA paper called room temperature super conductivity superconducting system for hybrid aerospace and the sea craft. >> Oh, okay. >> Which uses the RDC, the inertial reduction >> So, maybe maybe that is for you and I, maybe that's our next podcast. Maybe our next pod >> Okay, I think he talks about AI right here. This is the part So, the AI thing is the thing I'm most interested on. Why? Cuz I already know Sal's right about all the other stuff.
I mean, it's fun to go over it and learn a little more and get a little more in-depth like we just did. But, the thing that freaked me out the most, I think it was my second interview with Salvatore Pais or maybe third, and he just immediately starts talking about AI. And I'm like, "Why is he talking about AI? I thought he wants to talk about anti-gravity, room temperature superconductors." And I have learned over the years not doubt this man. So, when he's saying that, first thing I realized is he's saying they have AI.
And that's pretty much been confirmed now, years later. Not officially, but pretty much. But, the real bigger question is do they have super advanced AI? Do it have they already had superintelligence? Advanced general intelligence? Has the military, the CIA already had it?
I can't think of any way they haven't. They almost certainly have and it's almost certainly already making predictions. Now, I'm not saying that it's telling the future, but I'm saying it could get lucky. Could get lucky. >> That's just going through like researchgate and hitting your papers. >> Oh my goodness. I they're all on researchgate also academia.edu. I'll I'll tell you that yeah.
But we are you know, we should also speak eventually more on weapons of time and and um >> Yeah, I'd love to get back to that. >> But as a private citizen so hopefully this excuses what I'm about to say. >> Okay, okay, okay, okay. What the [ __ ] Chad? What did he just say? >> weapons of time and and um >> Yeah, I'd love to get back to that. >> I'd love to come back. Also artificial intelligence. You know, between you and I I know.
Again, I said I come upon your pod as a private citizen so hopefully this excuses what I'm about to say. But please don't call something that is man-made super intelligence especially when there is a cosmic super intelligence. >> I got you baited. I thought it was going to be something else. >> G that permeates everything and all that is the mother and father of it all. Please. >> Yeah. >> abomination. Absolute blasphemy to use a term like super intelligence to describe artificial intelligence which truly should be called machine sentience because that's what it is. >> I'll go with machine sentience. Yeah.
And it is different. This is kind of a side but it is apparently different than biological consciousness and there's nothing wrong with that. I mean, you know. So >> Calling it super intelligence in my opinion is abomination. I'm a lick. I'll just leave it at that. >> Okay.
So let me go to >> I mean that sounds directly speaking to this idea that there's this consciousness tapping and he just called it God a second ago exactly like I did. I guess it is a little bit blasphemous to call God super intelligence but look we got some dumbass monkeys on this planet and they don't really understand what you're saying otherwise. So we really have to give it to them in bite-size chunks that they can absorb. So yes, we may have to come to the issue of calling God super intelligence, but today is not that battle.
We have bigger fish to fry on that front. I just saw a huge super chat come in, so I just want to look at this. Oh, Sonia Sullivan, thank you for that huge super. They called these men wrong, fringe, or impossible, and now we're watching pieces of the physics they pursued show up in superconductivity, condensates as in Bose-Einstein condensates, plasma fusion, and field research. If this keeps unfolding, their names deserve to be remembered. Now, if the CIA has any say, they won't let that happen.
This right here is the plasma compression fusion device. Here we go. >> Plasma compression fusion device. I love this one. This also is something so many people have tackled different approaches to fusion. So it is wonderful that you also have done this. I mean, it is it's amazing to see how many people have approached this one.
A compact fusion device, right? So could you use this in >> There's several highly placed um Chinese There's several highly placed Chinese research team. >> I think counter-rotating fusors, by the way. >> Think some in University of Beijing that have cited this paper. The Chinese have deeply looked at this. I think they like it. They're the ones who mostly cite this. It's interesting that it should be the I think again, they're open-minded.
They're willing to consider >> Man, with the idea of the fusor? >> Farnsworth fusor, yeah. Filo Farnsworth. >> Yeah, the Farnsworth >> Correct. Correct. Exactly. The gentleman who created Correct. >> Farnsworth fusor, Robert Bussard inertial electrostatic compa- confinement fusion. Those are some of the people that he references in this.
There's a very clear lineage of what he's talking about, where this comes from. It comes from inertial electrostatics. Electrostatics, same with the the gravifiers, electrostatics as well. Same with Charles Bueller. Charles Bueller, who's doing this microchip for gravity propulsion, he was the electrostatics expert at NASA. Okay, so you're looking where's the physics?
It's in electricity. Electricity is the grand unifier. That's why electrostatics why that's anti-gravity. And then they'll be like, "Dear Ashton, the force of gravity's like many orders of magnitude weaker than electromagnetism." Yeah, it's just really, really weak electromagnetism. Gravity is weak electromagnetism.
Whoa, whoa, boom, whoa, mind-blowing. How is this like complicated for people? Like, two things are much one's much stronger than the other. They can't be the same. Yeah, they can. Sure, they can. >> Correct.
Well, these are dynamic fuses. Just think of his fuses just they work in a >> Yeah, okay, in this question, yes, possibly. I think when they were building Gorgon's stare with drones taking photos of everybody, feeding it to giant databases, I guarantee you they were thinking about AI sifting through all that to identify stuff. And so, yes, you're absolutely delusional if you don't realize that the government has like tracking of everyone every time everywhere all the time. Now, are they going to reveal that they have that? No, it's probably super illegal, but they have it.
They don't even necessarily have to use it, but they have it. Yeah, don't look up. >> dynamic mode. Why? And they counter-rotate so as to create the intense magnetic fields. >> Oh, okay. >> that compress the plasma. Until a certain point in time, nobody believed that a plasma could be compressed. Well, it can under certain conditions.
This is ONE OF THEM. >> PLASMA CAN only be compressed under certain conditions. And one of them is counter-rotating fusors, counter-rotating electromagnetic fields. Ooh, chat, I like it. So, this would be a way to then miniaturize a fusion reactor. Is that Okay, we have to try to engineer something that we can make small. Well, we can make counter-rotating things pretty small.
In fact, counter-rotation doesn't even require giant fusor. You know? Just again, just geometry. Oh, yes, and Z Alpina with the tornado, the vortex. Notice it's always vortex. Just like the drain on your tub.
You go take a bath, open the drain, vortex down into the extra dimension. Just how the ether works, too, chat. >> Okay, so these are electromagnetic then. These are not just electrostatic electrodes. >> No. No. These are electromagnetic in nature. >> Okay. >> Yes. They have the ability to accelerate. But remember, they counter-rotate. So, to generate those opposing magnetic fields in order to compress the plasma.
And the way they do it is to achieve uniformity. Also, this is the beauty of this. By counter-rotating, the actual vertical effect, it's almost like a spiraling vortices into each other. They have the ability to get rid of plasma instabilities. So, it has a dual role, which is >> Yes. Yes, I was just >> It gets rid of plasma instabilities, too.
Oh my god, chat. Oh my god. I was wondering if when they get the controlled fusion down, cuz look at it. You just think about it, and you go, if they're able to make an electromagnetic beam into a gravity beam, they have to have perfect control over the beam, which is not beyond our capability. We have all kinds of laser technology that's crazy as [ __ ] So, then you say, "Okay, well, if I can make a beam of ions shoot into another beam and fuse together, then if I get the geometry just right, wouldn't that just stabilize all the instabilities?"
And even in theory, they would say, "Yeah, there may be some other instabilities that kick in." Like we found some new instabilities when we start doing field reversed configuration, plasmoid instability. But then we find if we just let it the plasmoid instability go, it becomes stable. It becomes self-stable. This is why the plasma orbs are so stable. Why do these plasma orbs look like they're flying around?
Like there's no way a plasma orb should be able to be stable like that. They're stable like that because on the inside, they have counter-rotating action. Hitting itself hitting And at the center, you have your fusion reaction happening there. And on the outside of that, you have a bubble being created by it. An electromagnetic bubble being created by that reaction happening in the middle. Those orbs flying around are 100% fusion reactors.
They might try to wiggle around it and say, "Yeah, well, they're extracting zero-point energy, so they don't have to be at ignition temperature." You don't need ignition to do fusion. Your plasma ball doesn't have to be at the the temperature of the sun to do fusion. Mhm. >> [clears throat] >> And that's the reason why, by the way, I call it cool fusion. Because these orbs can do fusion if they want to, but they don't have to be an uncontrolled ball of fusion flying around. >> Studying one uh already guys did something that was slightly different, but he was looking at the same thing.
He was saying, "When you create a vortex, I mean, you can get twists and knots and vortices as well, but but they do have greater inherent dynamic stability than just trying to squeeze a plasma. >> But that's why these dynamic fuses have the ability to be controlled differently. >> Yeah. >> Yeah. So, under different rate of spin, exactly how you do it, well >> Holy [ __ ] chat. This is what's going on inside the orbs.
Like, one of the things that's bugging the [ __ ] out of me when you look at those orbs and you look at the heat signature is how inconsistent it is. As in like, the orb's spinning around really fast and then it just slows down. And then it just flips suddenly. Like, in one frame, it just flips. You're like, wait. The only way it could be doing that is there's some sort of dynamic control on the inside.
And when I say dynamic control, I mean exactly what Sal just said. Twist this knob here to get it to go that way. Twist this knob here to get it go that way. And they're twisting these knobs on the inside, which is causing the plasma to flip around and causing it to fly the direction they want it to go. And not a human's not doing that calculation, but a computer is. A computer can, yeah, do plasma.
The computer can do plasma, make sure the pressure's right, and control the pressure in such a way where it goes the exact direction they want it to go. That's why I say it's definitely AI controlling those orbs, not humans or anything like that. >> Wow. >> waste. Enablement is there, but the engineering thereof is not simple. >> Now, do you think they >> but it can be done. >> So, this this would be a big fusion project. Or or would it be Would this be like a like France building >> fusion. I'll I'll call this a compact fusion device.
The whole idea of this I wanted to use this as a power generation system for a tank. I had to seize a tank in mind. Yeah. I I've always had these uh delusions of grandeur that one day I'll have three divisions of Caesar tanks. Can you imagine if these things would actually work? Three divisions of Caesar tanks.
Imagine that the >> powered by a compact fusion reactor among other things. Imagine what it could do. >> Where you could back up >> So >> a lot of juice for that. The the Navy's railgun project >> temperature superconductivity idea. >> Yeah. >> Imagine the power. Imagine the energy generation capability of such a system that's compact compact fusion reactor that could possibly work in in a tank in a ship for example the Zumwalt. >> in a drone. Uh in a drone maybe. Sal's really pushing it here chat.
Guys if Sal gets disappeared this is I look General McCaslin disappearing look CIA you you win okay. Don't you disappear Sal. I will go full John Wick. Okay you've been you've been warned. You've been warned don't do it. I know you're thinking about it.
I know you're thinking about it CIA. I know you're thinking about disappearing Sal. Don't you do it. >> Look imagine the Zumwalt which is quote unquote is truly somewhat stealth in nature. I won't go further but still imagine that being powered by a compact fusion reactor among other things. Imagine what it could do. >> So >> [snorts] >> let me go back to our sixth patent >> Who's the guy saying that they're connecting fusion reactors to zero-point energy and gravity beams again? Oh yeah. >> technologies.
This is just kind of a review. I do have more slides after this but I did want to kind of go back to those and just walk people through them. Again we had the laser augmented turbojet, the EM field generator inertial mass reduction craft, high frequency grav wave generator, piezoelectricity induced superconductors, and the plasma compression fusion device. You have done about right. And so this is how we get from that large scale fundamental superforce to basically how to influence matter, how to create these >> Okay, I'm going to read this. This is actually just kind of good.
So, it starts superforce SF = C to the fourth speed of light divided by big G. Uh identified with the Planck force spacetime quantum vacuum manipulation the medium spacetime has an underlying quantum structure fluctuations of the vacuum provide medium the superforce. Energy gradients act upon spacetime geometry. Extreme conditions remember we need extreme energy density. That's what we get from fusion. Extreme conditions space force induced energy gradients can create extremely high energy density possible macroscopic quantum coherence and local modification of spacetime geometry.
So, long story short, we're going to call it here cuz I'm getting tired now. Huge amounts of energy density bend spacetime. And you say Ashton, that's not new. We already knew about that. Einstein's general relativity told us that huge amounts of of uh mass or energy bend spacetime. Yeah, exactly.
And what we found out is how we can bring that down. We found out we can bring that requirement way down to basically a very little amount. And without going into much detail, I'll just leave you with this thought. A lot of people perpetually argue against zero-point energy by claiming that yes, the Casimir effect two plates coming together these two plates coming together you you can get energy out of that. But you have to pull the plates apart if you want to reset it. So, you can't get perpetual energy because you're going to use the same amount of energy to separate the plates.
But is that true? Are we going to use the same amount of energy to separate the plates? Is that a requirement in our system? What if we work on that requirement? What if we find a way where we can separate the plates at 1/10 of the energy cost? No matter what that mechanism is, that would lead to free energy.
Because now we can get 10 times the amount of energy out. That's the same as essentially lighting a cannon and watching the cannonball go flying. And you'd say, "Well, Ashton, this is cheating." Yes, and it's called opening your system. A closed system, you can't do this. Cuz a closed system must account for every mechanism that led to that state.
But an open system can tap in to outside elements. And those outside elements can be energy. So that's what I would leave people with. Don't turn the lights off. Keep the lights on. And think about if something becomes a challenge, think about what is a solution to that challenge.
Mhm. Let's go to the super chats. Thank you everybody in my pilled chat, guys. Pilled chat and Rumble chat, y'all have been popping off. Guys, thank you very much. Methyl, I see you guys in the pilled chat.
Rumble chat, double ones, wild lurker hanging out as smash balls as usual. Nice to see all you guys. And then my YouTube chat, you guys were on fire tonight. The YouTube chat was moving so fast I couldn't even keep up at a while for a while there. Tom Foster Tim Foster was saying, "Ashton, bro, Sal, and fellow Orbeez, thank you for teaching the full spectrum of physics, government, politics, economics, education, and religion. Makes our creator's day.
Truth will set you free." Honestly, I mostly just do it cuz it's things that interest me. Why do I rip on Ilhan Omar? It's not because I'm necessarily prejudiced against Somalis or Democrats even. It's cuz she's a [ __ ] con artist. Because I can see hypocrisy a mile away. Cuz I can see when like 60 Somalis that are connected to Ilhan Omar go down for a massive fraud scandal, I'm like, there's no way she didn't know cuz I'm just not naive, you know?
So, I just rip on people cuz they deserve it for the most part. And you'll find that I attack people all over the spectrum. I attack people all over that are on the right and I attack people that are on the left. Usually cuz they're idiots or they say something stupid or because they have no [ __ ] clue what they're talking about. But also from the war perspective on Iran, cuz I want people to understand that uh to quote the letter to Ashton Forbes, all the world's problems are created for political reasons.
When the governor or whatever, the president of Iran's helicopter crashes, it's not a [ __ ] accident. You think it's an accident that the helicopter of the president of Iran's helicopter crashes right before we go to war with them a year later? Um yeah, no I didn't. We hit that [ __ ] with a directed energy. That we [ __ ] beam the [ __ ] out of that. I don't even know I don't even have to have evidence cuz I know we definitely did that [ __ ] So, that's the reason why.
And also like if someone were to get by an asteroid, if Kiev or Moscow gets hit by an asteroid, you're going to know that's not an accident. You know, there's no chance it's an accident one of the major cities got hit by an asteroid. We could stop it at any moment if we wanted. We knew it was coming. All of the above. So, that's why geopolitics is so important in all of this is that once you realize what technology we have, you realize what's really going on.
And the game that's going on at the highest level is pretty sick, man. They don't really care about us. They don't care if our lives get lost, we get trampled on. Makes no difference. War Ranch LLC sent What did you send me? I think War Ranch, were you the one that sent me this?
Yeah, we're going to play your little clip here. I think you sent me this, uh War Ranch. Here you go. >> If we've learned how to harness some of that to do similar to what these craft, if not as elegant as these craft, that in my mind needs to stay secret. That needs to stay ultra-classified. Because imagine if you can harness things like zero-point energy, if zero-point energy can be harnessed, which would kind of make sense that if it did, you have this infinite energy supply to power your craft, and it's everywhere. It's everywhere we go.
It's inside of us, even. This quantum field vacuum, if that's accessible in a meaningful way, it makes sense that there wouldn't be limitations on what we could do in terms of travel throughout the universe. So, if these are from another place in the universe, then why couldn't they exceed the speed of light if they if they can cancel mass? Because then you basically aren't restricted by Einstein's equations in his theories in not general relativity, but in special relativity where he talks about speed of light can't be exceeded. >> [clears throat] >> Maybe that That face right there. That's the face of somebody who knows, chat.
Zero doubt in my mind Ryan Graves knows. Ryan Graves knows about MH370. I don't know what game Ryan Graves is playing, but this is a man who sold his soul right here. This is a man right here who sold out. He's on team fake disclosure, whatever [ __ ] they're doing, right? If somebody comes to you and starts talking about zero-point and free energy like this and you're just hmm hmm Bro, what the [ __ ] you talking about?
You're not going to respond? This isn't freaking you out? Oh, of course not cuz you're buddy with Hal Puthoff, so you already know for sure this is all true. He knows for sure this is all true. It's not freaking him out. He doesn't even have a follow-up question.
I've been suspicious of Ryan Graves for a while because he was in the Air Force and I'm revealing Air Force MQ-9 Reapers and Gorgon Stare technology. And he's what? Pretending like he doesn't know about those? At the bare minimum, he should come out and be like, "No, I worked on Gorgon Stare and I know that's not what it looks like." Nope. Silence.
Somehow the debunkers don't think it's weird that none of these guys will talk about the videos. Bro, what's happening is these people are on the side of the government and they're on the side of protecting the government. Unequivocally, that's what's happening. I don't like it, but that's what it is. >> Maybe that's not true. I mean, there are examples of the speed of light being exceeded. The expansion of the universe is expanding faster than the speed of light. >> He's arguing for it.
Guys, we are like just several months away from them just openly discussing wormholes now. They're going to openly start discussing wormholes. Nobody's going to be laughing. And they're going to be like, "Isn't it crazy that wormholes can be real now?" And I'm going to go, "Are you [ __ ] kidding me? Are you [ __ ] kidding me?"
I have been screaming about wormholes being real and that we have been engineering them for like 3 years now. And they're going to just come in and just start talking about it like it's casual, like everybody always knew they were real. So, when I start crashing out, chat, you'll know it's 100% justified. Broadway line, Reddit's gay. Very gay, chat. Very gay.
Also, Redditors, please, I don't ask for much. I don't respect you at all. Stop pinging me on your little rage posts and your little cope posts. They all have me blocked, but then they ping me. They're like, "Ashton Forbes is scamming them again." Like, bro, why are you pinging me?
And it's not that I care because I have them because I have them muted or blocked myself, mostly just muted. So, I actually don't see those, but what I do see is I see all the replies for some reason. I don't really understand why, but all the replies show up in my feed. Super annoying. Anyway. Dobby with a throbby.
Thank you very much for those supers. A Thursday Ashton stream. Guys, yesterday, we might have to do one of those like Coach Tomlin did. I fallen down the rabbit hole of this video game and it's a problem. It's an actual problem, chat. I'm probably going to have to do a reveal.
Ashton's super characters, Ashton's Fire Emblem mutant freak monster characters. Power gaming these characters. I'm like, leveling them up so they're going to be like the exact opposite so I can mix them together into a mutant freak super monster character. Mhm. Chat, putting in way too much effort into this. And I'm enjoying the hell out of it.
So, maybe in like a month, we'll have a reveal stream and I'll go through every character one at a time. And I'll be like, "And here's Kai and this is how I leveled Kai up and now why Kai has this class and why he's got all his super skills." And literally no one will care about it. Except for me. You know what? Then I'm going to have to will this into reality.
Okay, Dobby with a throbby. You should send Wi-Fi files the clip of trolling the hell out of South. Yeah, Wi-Fi files get Guys, >> [laughter] >> those guys hate me, man. You You what? It's honestly it's fine because I don't even care. I almost like just being the troll that's just in the peanut gallery.
It's almost more fun to me than being elevated to the guy that's actually got to like speak and be taken seriously. You know, when I do these live streams and talk to you, I feel like I have to like, you know, I can't be I can't go full casual. You kind of have to have that that business uh professional voice. Can't crash out on people. It's a lot more fun to just rip people to shreds that are just speaking [ __ ] You know? So, I kind of like that they've sidelined me.
It's more enjoyable. >> [clears throat] >> MT Thunder Vaxcel vertical enclosed cavity surface emitting lasers printed by MBE terahertz pulse to be converted via ISHE in cofeb to terahertz spin waves. Something to tap into electricity? No. Anyway, if you can decode that, probably secret to anti-gravity. Don't know. Thank you very much, sir. Appreciate that. Don't know.
1013 fly super jack physics felony physics, guys. I hope you are enjoying it. So, I don't know how Sal gets away with what he does. He must have Yeah, I bet he gets written up a lot. I bet he has to have a little meetings with his manager a lot. You were on the podcast, you said a little too much about free energy again.
You said extra dimensions, you weren't supposed to say that. Surface plasmon polaritons Weyl semimetals. Interesting. If you dig into this, you find that metals and plasma actually start to become very similar due to uh I think it's the electron drift velocity or something related to how fast the electrons move. Pretty cool. Sonya Sullivan Sal's fast name because of his 10-year passion and knowledge.
Says, "Glad you have an honest sounding board. Keep grounded in your truth." And we'll probably have to have a follow-up with Sal. We've had a lot of revelations. Um but that was a really good, just you know, from the peanut gallery watching him chat with Tim Ventura, I learned a lot. Mark E.
Bay, thanks for the hard work. Hope it's a labor of love. Of course it's a labor of love, guys. You know how I do. I If I didn't enjoy this, I wouldn't even do it. I wouldn't do it if I didn't enjoy it, guys.
And I like learning along with you. Sometimes I feel like we're just side by side learning this physics together. And that's what makes it so enjoyable. A lot of you guys, that's why you are frequent flyers here. Always watching. And then Sonia with the huge super chat once again.
Thank you very much. They will be remembered, chat. And avenged. Stojan Carlistic Carl Sick, I don't know. Combine all those patents together and you get the orbs. Yeah, you combine those patents together and you get some UFOs that are flying around in the sky.
And that's something I noticed back in 2018. I'm reading these patents by this pat- by this Navy engineer. I'm like, you combine these together, you definitely get some UFOs. Hm, interesting. The black lines in the thermal video, are they possible exhaust from the turbo van? Yes, but not normal exhaust. It's not normal exhaust because we see normal exhaust coming out of the plane.
We can see the exhaust. We can see the heat coming out of that. We're seeing X-rays being created. Those dark lines are 100% proof that there is like a fusion reaction and or space-time manipulation going on in the middle. And what they're doing is they're creating that exact trap, that optical trap. But there's a hole. They have one hole in the optical trap because they allow for the stuff to escape, the X-rays to escape out of the one direction.
And I don't think it's a coincidence that direction happens to be exactly the direction the orbs are moving in. The orbs also happen to be moving in the direction of the dark lines. Which would actually indicate that what they're doing is manipulating conditioning in the vacuum in front of them to fall forward. And what we see is these x-rays as a byproduct of the propulsion mechanism. Pretty cool, huh? Oklahoma dad dads, thank you for all your effort.
Thank you very much. I wish Admiral Hyman Rickover was here with us disseminating all this tech and knowledge info and tech. Yes. Guys, I wish there was a lot of people with us. I don't know who that is. I hope that's a real person.
Name doesn't seem like it could be real, but let's just assume that it is. It's probably the prestigious admiral that I don't know. Imagine all the people that know about this that had not allowed to talk. Even Sal already gave like a second disclaimer when he was going to talk about AI. Second disclaimer in the middle of his interview. >> [laughter] >> Zapperu Zapper I says, "Wonder what the energy released from the large pallet of lithium-ion batteries effect was on the orbs." Indeed, the big question lingering question is are the lithium-ion batteries required for this zap or can they do it without the batteries entirely?
And the more I have learned, the more I've moved away from them requiring these batteries. That they can actually probably just manipulate space-time even without batteries on board the plane. Imagine you don't even need a payload on board the craft that you're going to teleport. No. I mean, we don't know. Maybe they do need a payload on board, but we'll see. Ultimately, at the end of the day, this technology is absolute magic and as Bart T. Welding here says, this chat is full of high IQ MFs.
Stay hard, chat. Guys, I'm out. We'll be back tomorrow. We got Tim Ventura on Saturday. Take it easy, everybody. Peace, everyone.
Later. And thank you for all the super chats, too. >> [music and bell] >> Out in the fields [music] where the skies are wide, talking about a journey through the cosmic ride. Einstein and Thorne, they set the stage for trip through time across the space age. Wormholes connect distant points in space, traversable paths to a far-off place. No black holes pull, no crushing [music] weight, just a cosmic tunnel to a distant gate. >> Talking wormholes, stargates, negative [music] energy, travel through the cosmos, it's our destiny. MH370, [music] where did it go?
Boeing 777 through a wormhole from the talking wormholes, stargates, negative [music] energy, travel through the cosmos, it's our destiny. MH370, where did it go? Boeing 777 through a wormhole from [music] the >> [music] >> Exotic [music] matter, negative energy is the key to stabilize a wormhole for you and me. Quantum vacuum, squeeze so tight, creating conditions [music] for this wondrous flight. Static fields and lasers in the lab they play, generating forces in a new kind of way. Gravitational [music] squeezing, Casimir force, negative zones we need to stay the course. >> Talking wormholes, [music] stargates, negative energy, travel through the cosmos, it's our destiny.
MH370, where [music] did it go? Boeing 777 through a wormhole from the tangential formalism play so fine. Spherical geometry we realign. Energy conditions that we must [music] defy. For a stable wormhole, let's give it a try. >> [music] [music] >> From all forces balancing the plates, creating the throat, opening gates from Earth to the stars [music] in a single bound. A shortcut through space profound.
Engineers [music] and dreamers hold the key to future worlds and what we could be. With science in hand, we forge ahead through the cosmic paths that we now tread. With talking wormholes [music] stargates negative energy, travel through the cosmos and see your star destiny. Theory 370, [music] where did it go? Blowing triple 7 through a wormhole flow. From the fields to the stars, we break the chains.
Understanding [music] the universe, we make the gains. Loowhoop Crooks shines bringing truth to light. Through his music we'll explore [music] the night. With wormholes and stargates, our path is clear. Exploring the cosmos, our future's here.