Reversing TIME

Breaking news tonight, a Malaysia Airlines flight [music] with 239 people on board, including four Americans, >> [music] >> has gone missing. >> Even as these grainy satellite images released today by the Chinese government [music] >> Again, the Malaysia flight 2 was a was one shot at China saying, "Knock it off." >> Why shoot it down though if it's not hostile? >> Our technologies permit us to manipulate time [music] and space. >> Why the magnets work? >> And the distance annihilator. >> This country is [music] very powerful.

Far more powerful than people understand. >> [music] >> We have weaponry that nobody has any idea what it is, and it is the most powerful weapons in the world. >> Not even close. >> I remember the >> [music] >> line from the Hindu scriptures, the Bhagavad Gita. >> [music] >> Vishnu is trying to persuade the prince that he should do his duty. [music] And to impress him takes on his multi-armed form [music] and says, "Now I am become death, >> [music] >> the destroyer of worlds."

We suppose we all thought that one way or another. >> [music] >> Hello, and welcome to the live stream, everybody. Happy Halloween, guys. So much stuff to talk about, of course. Captain Picard uh Patrick Stewart passing away, biggest news. Some of you may be disappointed that I'm not dressed up, chat. I'm an adult. I'm an adult, chat.

I don't dress up. But, there is at least one No, no, no, no. Two pumpkins. Chat, two pumpkins. You can basically say that my whole set has been dressed as Halloween. Absolutely incredible decorating, if I do say so myself. Two whole pumpkins.

Guys, we [clears throat] need to talk politics real quick. Reason being, Minnesota, my state, the state that I live in, is prosecuting James O'Keefe and Cam Higby Higby because they did an undercover sting on the lax uh methods in which you can vote in Minnesota. Completely unjustified, absolutely fascist. Not fascist in the way the Democrats say it. Fascist in the way Democrats think that it means in their minds. As in, there's prosecu- prosecutorial discretion would indicate just because you can charge somebody with something doesn't mean that you should charge somebody with something.

Especially when they are on camera ahead of time recording themselves saying they're not trying to do anything illegal. And then you just ignore all that and say we're going to prosecute them anyway. That's actual fascism. That's actually using the law to go after your political enemies, unambiguously. The reason why I bring this up is if Republicans were smart, they need to be jumping all over this like I am right now. Because this is the ultimate hypocrisy for the people that are calling you fascists, for them to actually be fascist themselves.

While you're in the middle of prosecuting Ilhan Omar, and they're claiming that oh, that's just a paperwork issue. The hypocrisy is through the roof. This needs to be called out. And if you're not voting against these people, then you're enabling it. And the most important part, if you're follower of mine and you enjoy this content, what you need to realize right now is these people would put me in prison. These people are the Redditors.

When the Redditors grow up, they grow up to be Mary Moriarty. That's who they grow up to be. And the reason why no one goes to Reddit is because they've banned everybody with a different opinion on Reddit. That's how they live their lives. And then they come to X. And the reason why they leave Twitter, the reason why they leave X, everybody's voice is allowed on the X and they hate that.

They hate that they can't ban everybody else and so they leave the platform. They want to do that to us in real life. They want to ban my platform because they say I'm pushing misinformation. They've debunked me and it's official and it's final. Random internet anonymous people have debunked me and therefore I shouldn't be allowed to have content. They will do that.

So you need to go vote and you need to vote these people out of office immediately. Okay. That being said, actually [snorts] one more point on this, there's a lot of people saying, "Oh, Trump didn't give me everything I want. So I'm going to vote for the Democrats now." Are you nuts, bro? They want to kill you, man.

The way that the trans people say that, "Oh, they want to trans gender side us." Which is all imaginary. That's what they actually want to do to Republicans. That's what they dream about doing. That's what they dress up like Charlie Kirk on Halloween. Actually psychotic.

So get your priorities straight cuz real point here, this channel only exists cuz we have the freedoms we do under the current administration and under governments that aren't fascist. Okay, that being said, don't need to harp on it anymore. We got a lot of interesting fun stuff to to about. >> [clears throat] >> Tucker Carlson This dropped uh was it two nights ago? Last night? Not sure, but here we go. Here's the official Yesterday it looks like. Tucker Carlson approved trailer I mean, I should probably be hyping this up more.

I should be hyping this up more, guys. I'm probably going to try to hype this up more. Tucker Carlson approved trailer for Shadow Figures. >> Was JFK killed by a lone gunman? Is CIA remote viewing real? Is it really possible? >> [laughter] >> We're putting conspiracy theories to the test to see if they're really theories at all. >> [laughter] >> Shadow Figures takes some of the world's most famous mysteries and recreates them to see if the official narrative is true. A team of elite operations veterans put the magic bullet theory to the test. And how did the Malaysian airliner vanish in 2014?

Experts analyze whistleblower footage and they recreate the explosion some say brought it down. >> Analyze whistleblower footage and and and and analyze the the explosion that some say brought it down. That's a very weird framing. >> And is it possible that Atlantis was a real place? Can psychics actually see what's going on in real time from the other side of the world? Meet Project Stargate's first recruit to learn about efforts to train potential psychic spies. So, it's time we find out for sure on new series Shadow Figures at TuckerCarlson.com. >> Okay. I want to clear some things up here.

Number one, they do interview me. >> [laughter] >> What do you mean? So, this is a TV show. There's like eight episodes or 10 episodes and one of the entire episodes is about me and MH370. That's what he's talking about there. Why they're framing it an explosion, I don't know. Now, what I'll say is this is that I mean I don't have editorial control.

So, in theory, you know, they could debunk me, attack me, they could chop it up, but I mean I was there and I did the recording and everyone was really cool and nice and I don't feel like anybody was going to be doing anything like that. I don't want to spoil what happens for you cuz I want you guys to enjoy it. I think you guys would all enjoy it because you know the content. I'll give you the the high level though. The high level is they bought an airplane and they tested to see if lithium-ion batteries will burn up the airplane.

And so, the idea is it's a bunch of military veteran guys and they're like looking at these conspiracy theories that are out there and they're taking one aspect of those conspiracy theories and they're kind of like doing a MythBusters kind of thing with it. Okay? I mean, that's I guess how I would describe it. But and so, they kind of they came to me and they asked me, you know, what they should do and what the idea would be and I and they came to me with the idea of the fire and the batteries and whatever and I said, "Yeah."

And I to be honest with you, I told them ahead of time like it's probably not it's probably going to burn up real quick because a real uncontrolled fire is going to burn up very fast. Uh but, you know, controlled burn won't. So, honestly, it's you know, you can kind of anticipate how it's going to go. The real question is how they're going to frame it because we even do like an interview where they show me the results and we kind of go over those results. So, I don't know. We'll see.

But, I'll point out this too is that, you know, they've asked me to do a follow-up as well. So, there's a lot of content coming. Uh as you can see, I didn't lie about the Tucker Carlson thing. That's literally Tucker Carlson talking about it right there. Um you can also then assume I'm not lying about the other uh publication that's coming out in in a little bit. And I'm also not lying about our let's just call them our friends who want to talk to us.

Here's the update. It's happening. The interview will not be remote. The interview is going to be in person. I'm not going to give any more details about who the person is, who I'm interviewing, where I'm going to do it, or when it's going to happen. But it's going to happen.

I'm going to do the interview, and I'm talking specifically about the person that wants to talk about MH370. Uh and I'm working right now on what it's going to be called and how we're going to release it. Um but yes, it's going to all be in person. Things are already in the works on that. So, I just want to give you guys a quick update on that. That's also real, and that's also happening.

So, get yourself ready for it. Get hyped for it. That might even be the next hard truth that's going on. I've been probably focused a lot of attention on how it's going to work. Now, the other thing I want to point out, I missed a couple things. If you were watching the last live stream, we went for 2 and 1/2 hours, almost 3 hours actually.

I lost track of time completely. Check that out if you haven't, because that was a lot of the questions that are going to be asked. A few things that I missed was the fires and the batteries. This person I'm going to talk to also knows a lot about Let's just say they know a lot about batteries. Okay? So, there's definitely going to be questions about the lithium ion batteries and the scenario about what happened to the plane.

What I'll say is, I don't know where we should have our expectations set. I think we should keep them managed, but there's a lot of boomer bust potential. This interview could be beyond our wildest expectations. And it could be just, you know, maybe it adds a little few more pieces, but doesn't really break the bank. That's kind of where I would range it. And I Truthfully, I don't know where it's going to be.

The truth is, I've spoken to this person, and there's a lot of stuff they won't talk to me about over the phone. So, that tells you much. They said it has to be in person, and you know, they're going to have final editorial control. I'll also tell you that. Is that one of the stipulations of the interview is that, you know, I said fine, you know, anything you don't want released, that's fine. I don't care.

I'm not trying to break national security with this, although we're already doing enough damage as it is. I mean, anything we do is already harming national security. And the other side of it I'll say is that I'm not trying to prove that we've got Jarvis orbs with this particular interview. This particular interview is really just to get the truth about MH370 and to corroborate the footage of the videos. The the the footage of the videos is actually real military surveillance and not VFX or whatever other stupid people are saying. There you go.

That's all I'm going to say about it. That should be more than enough to get people enticed and excited. So, the other thing we missed, the the batteries and the Rolls-Royce engine data. Those are the two things I didn't discuss in the last live stream. I was thinking about it afterwards, make sure I had all the topics I wanted to discuss. The Rolls-Royce engine data, I have to believe exists and a lot of people know it.

And it was just never released to the public because the Rolls-Royce engine data will tell the truth about the plane. Right? Okay. Let's change gears. Patrick Stewart, guys. Now, one of the main reasons I wanted to talk about Patrick Stewart, not just because I think he was a good guy, great actor, had iconic role in Star Trek, but because of what Star Trek stands for.

Not only was Star Trek my childhood, probably a lot of your childhoods, I literally dreamed about one day being a Starfleet officer that could travel around the the galaxy or the universe. Dreamed about it. Obsessed with Star Trek online, played that game for years, just larping as always a Star Trek captain flying around my super ship. Chat. I had the Anarax. Woo.

All gold plated. Anyway. Also because and I have a clip here. I think Star Trek is a form of disclosure. I think Star Trek really is a form of disclosure and that the government knew it was a form of disclosure and this was their way to get the masses to start understanding and getting used to this idea of this technology existing. Warp drives, replicators, teleport teleporters, wormholes, all the physics.

I mean, the physics is too accurate. When you start to learn that oh, we have free energy, zero-point energy is real, and you realize the implications of the of the technology, you realize it's Star Trek. It's everything in Star Trek exactly. You're like, wait, how could they have gotten all that exactly right? You're like, oh, they had really good sources. They were just really lucky with the physicists they were talking to.

How about here's a different angle. Here's a different angle. The engineers and physicists had solved this before Star Trek was even a thing. And those people were talking to the people that eventually started to make Star Trek. Gene Roddenberry, some of the other hard sci-fi writers. Arthur C.

Clarke is personal friends with Hal Puthoff. So yes, I think that they actually got real information and that's why those shows are like that. Now here's a weird, creepy story that I think corroborates it. Here it is. Now this was So people are posting Patrick Stewart stuff and I see this one and I go, boy, this is This is weird. There you go.

Shout out to Britta No Soup for Nulls, by the way. I've been enjoying her content. >> of heads of state visit the set. Is it true that Ronald Reagan visited the set of Star Trek: The Next Generation? >> The president, um, he was he was no [clears throat] longer the president. He came on the set and it was a great honor for all of us. Um, unlike the two chairmen of the Joint Chiefs of Staff who came, not together, at separate >> times, yes. >> who said to me, um may we uh or may I uh sit in the chair?

I mean, the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, he could have erased me, you know? [laughter] Um with a drone shot. So, >> Um, yeah. >> Captain Picard, come. But, he asked me, and of course I said yes. But, uh the president just went over and sat in it. >> He didn't ask. >> [laughter] >> And I guess that goes with the job. >> Yeah, right. Once you as a as an ex-president, you every chair is your chair.

That's what they say. >> No, it was thrilling, thrilling to have him on the set, and uh we were all very honored by his presence. >> Uh well, I'm always honored by yours. Thank you so much for coming back on the show. >> sir. >> The president, a former president, Ronald Reagan, and the joint chiefs of staff wanted to go and watch on be on the set of Star Trek. Does that seem normal to you guys? How many How many sets do you think President Trump has been to? Here's a number Here's a guess from me, zero. That's how many I'm guessing, zero.

How many How many sets you guys think Obama goes to or went to? Guys, maybe now he does cuz he's now he's like a fan, you know, he's just basically a movie star himself, basically, or actor. Pretty odd. Now, normally I would just and the old me would have just ignored that entirely. We said, "What? It's just normal.

He just he wants to see the show that he enjoys." But, here's another angle to it. What if he knew that technology was real? What if the reason why he wanted to sit in the captain's chair is cuz he knew that he'll never actually experience this technology, and he'll actually never be able to be a captain in real life? But, he'll always know that technology's real, and that one day there really will be captains just like that. And he wanted to just imagine it for a minute in the chair.

That's why I think Ronald Reagan wanted to sit in that chair. Man, that is weird, dude. That is really weird because Ronald Reagan ran the whole Star Wars initiative. Where we were actually working on super advanced technology to prevent long-range ICBM nuclear warheads from being able to hit us. To stop them. And that's what this clip I played yesterday, which I'm going to play again here.

I just think it's so significant. The Edward Teller clip about anti weapons. Listen closely. I was going to edit this in the intro tonight, but I didn't have time. I was too lazy. Here we go. >> The stability of the political solution.

It might work. But we have tried it for a long period. I do not believe that >> So, she basically was asking before this, why don't we just stop trying to make weapons? Why don't we just stop making nuclear weapons? And he's basically saying it doesn't work. Because that is you can't be like, "Oh, everybody just stop making weapons."

So, he says, "Instead of not making weapons, we should make weapons that are defensive weapons instead of offensive weapons." >> technical means will succeed. I do believe that as long as only and please take what I say literally. As long as we talk only about weapons of attack, political solutions will be very hard to find. If we can develop methods of defense, not weapons of mass destruction, but weapons aimed at the weapons of mass destruction, anti weapons. If we can develop these, then we could be in a more stable situation. >> I think that was about 1986 or something like that.

So, this is the '80s. This was right during the exact Star Wars initiative. That's why I'm bringing it up. Right around the exact time when Ronald Reagan was visiting the set of uh uh set of Star Trek. So, people say, "What about nuclear deterrents?" Uh it's the ultimate nuclear deterrents.

Uh Carey Eatherton, a subscriber. Oh, yeah, see? I doxed you. I know who you are. People think I don't know who they are. They think I'm just a random dude and these names don't mean anything to me.

I know who each and every one of you are. Every one of you. Anyway, just kidding. So, the nuclear deterrents is we can warp a nuke back onto you. He's actually right. This is the ultimate weapon and this is why I mean, I'm absolutely convinced that those orbs in the MH370 videos are an anti-nuclear weapon.

They're an anti-nuclear weapon. Maybe that's what we should be calling them. Because if somebody tries to shoot a nuke at us, we just orbit away or we orbit back onto them. And the moment that happens, I mean, holy They won't even know what hit them. That is absolutely those orbs are our trump card, our super anti-weapon. We probably have crazier than that.

That's just one of our weapons. Just to think that they have that, though, scary. And just think about that capability. Even if you don't believe it's true, just think about that capability. If I could warp a nuke back onto you, that capability is classified. I You you just have to think about it and be like, "Oh, yeah, that would be classified."

Cuz it is. It is classified. It's secret. That's why they don't reveal that they have space-time manipulation cuz they can warp a nuke back onto you. So, >> [clears throat] >> let's switch gears. go back to another uh Patrick Stewart reference. I'm going to do I think I'm just going to mix in the Patrick Stewart references and the Star Trek references.

There are so many good lessons that Captain Picard taught. And by the way, Captain Picard is objectively the superior captain to Captain Kirk. We can fight right now. I'm ready to throw down. He just died like yesterday. We'll throw down.

We will fight. Okay? He The reasons why mainly number one, he was smarter. He was a better strate- a strategic uh officer, as well. He's just higher higher stat skill in strategy. We just have to be honest. Okay.

Here we go. >> [sighs] >> It is possible to commit no mistakes and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life. I believe I understand, sir. And Data, will you leave your hesitation and self-doubt here in your quarters? >> Ooh. Chat, uh we're probably getting copyright striked tonight, by the way, and I don't even care.

That is so great because Data is struggling with whether or not he's a real person, whether or he's real or if he's an actual if he's just uh artificial. And he learns a valuable lesson that we all have to learn as humans. We're all going to lose. This is probably the harshest lesson, the one that Redditors need to learn the most. We're all going to lose at some point in life. And it's not because we're terrible and we suck. It's because everybody loses.

It's possible to not make any mistakes, to do everything right, and still lose in the end. Because when two people are competing, only one person can win. And so what that What does that teach us? It teaches us we should be humble in victory. We should be humble in victory and we shouldn't look down too much on ourselves and punish ourselves when we lose. We should take everything in stride, learn from our losses, and move on, and be better afterwards.

A simple lesson, but an important one. Let's do another. What else I got here? Oh man, we're going to save the Neil deGrasse Tyson ones for later. Okay. Let's do this one.

Why do you Oh wait, no. Uh Yeah, okay. Who's this one? Q. Q's some of one of my favorite characters in Star Trek, chat. Why? Because I love their dynamic.

They run into an alien that is a god. That is uh let's call him a demigod. He not necessarily immortal, but he's essentially got magical powers. He's got the powers of zero point energy. He's basically got zero point energy. They didn't really know what zero point energy was there, but that's what he's got, okay?

And he doesn't ab- He abuses power all the time, but he's kind of got his own code of ethics and rules that he lives by. He's not cruel for the sake of being cruel. He's just kind of a in general. So they've got a nice dynamic back and forth because he finds Picard's thought process, decision-making to be intriguing. So he wants to explore it. So every time he tries to test Picard, Picard always dunks on him, chat.

So here you go. >> It's the thing. And I'm surprised you have to ask when your human Shakespeare explained it all so well. So he did, but don't depend too much on any one single >> you don't know the content of your own library. Hear this Picard and reflect. All the galaxies a stage. >> World, not galaxy. All the world's a stage. >> How do you know that one? >> Well, if he were living now, he would have said the galaxy.

How about this? Uh Life is but a walking shadow, a poor player that struts and frets his hour upon the stage and then is heard no more. It is a tale told by an idiot full of sound and fury signifying nothing. >> Chat, do you just Why is TV suck now? When I was listening to this, I was thinking TV sucks ass now. We used to get 24 1-hour episodes every season and there was only 3 months until the next season after the last season. You're kidding, dog. >> Okay.

Are we back? Testing. Testing. Okay. Now, the CIA somebody's got access to my computer. I mean three live streams in a row, computer randomly crashing in the middle of live stream.

Computer has never crashed otherwise. Um yeah. Whatever. I don't believe in I don't believe in coincidences. Anyway, back at the task at hand. Talking about TV shows.

The Star Trek is out here talking about Shakespeare. When is the last time you heard Shakespeare get referenced in a non-comical way in a television show? Anyway, this entire clip is is just going through, you know, some of the most important literature in all of history. Okay, let me get it back up here. My Twitter crashed, too. >> Sorry, I had some bad I mean just we had to restart my computer. I have a bunch of background stuff going on.

Okay, hold on. Here we go. I think we're back. Okay. Let me get back to that clip. Pick up where we left off.

Here we go. We got life lessons to learn, chat. Apologies for the delay. I'm going to try to fix that over the weekend. See if we can get a new computer going here. >> It is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing. I see. >> [clears throat] >> So, how we respond to a game tells you more about us than our real life.

This tale told by an idiot. Interesting, Q. Oh, thank you very much. I'm glad you enjoyed it. >> So, you see, Picard sees right through him right there. That was actually pretty deep and a lot of people probably missed it right there. What happens is Picard realizes he's in a game and he realizes that a little child is playing with him.

A little child with god-like powers. He realizes, oh, the reason why you're making us do this little game is cuz you want to see how we're going to act. You want to see how we're going to behave. And the moment the cosmic being hears that, he goes, oh, yeah. He realizes it. He's not trying to hide it.

He's like, oh, you understand what the game is. You understand what the point is. Mhm. Now watch him clap back. Now the clap back. >> Perhaps maybe a little Hamlet? Oh, no, I know Hamlet.

And what he might say with irony, I say with conviction. What a piece of work is man. How noble in reason, how infinite in faculty, in form, in moving, how express and admirable, in action, how like an angel, in apprehension, how like a god. Surely, you don't see our species that, do you? I see us one day becoming that, Q. >> HELL YEAH. BOOM.

GET BITCHED, Q. THAT IS THE ultimate clap back. He says He says, we're like gods, too. Not just you. And he says, you don't you don't possibly think that you answer on the level of us gods. And he says, one day we will be.

One day even after I'm gone we will be. Boom. Exactly. That's why we are here right now. Because we know that warp drives are literally real. And one day humans will be gods.

The exact way Picard is talking about in that clip right there. >> [snorts] >> Mic drop. Chat, I love it. Okay, I think it's time now. Think it's time now we go to the other clips. Think it's time we go to talk a little bit about the topic at hand here. Now that we got warmed up. >> [clears throat] >> Reversing time.

Shout out. Salvatore Pais, Andrea Martin, and of course Evan Howell of the Ancient Pathways podcast. Make sure you guys are checking it out if you have it. Oops, that's not the right link. Which one is it? I got too many windows open and everything just got messed up. Okay.

Oh, here it is. Okay. >> like a little bit of the sting that they have. But like how how many If you had to guess there was a hundred civilizations out there that came >> Oh wait, I think I hold on. I'm not at the right part here. What does it say? >> Well >> In those days there were giants, men of great renown. Gilgamesh was one of them.

Remember two-thirds god? Look what Ashton Forbes >> had the similar problem in their history and that they overcame with total greed and like subversion. >> Look what Ashton Forbes has been saying lately. What if we're talking about reverse time travel here? >> Reverse time travel in the past. >> Okay. First of all, >> [clears throat] >> just going to throw it out here, guys. Sal is basically the only person on this planet I trust. I used to tell you guys I don't trust anybody. Okay, I trust one person.

I'm going to I'm going to ride or die with Salvatore Pais. I'm ride or die with Salvatore Pais and the reason why is A, physics is right. B, he's a Navy engineer, active Navy engineer, and C, he hasn't really Most people when they try to grift off me, it's pretty obvious. They're trying to talk to you right away. They want you to promote some stuff, whatever, right? Salvatore Pais has never been that way.

He's never been that way. Um even though he does ask me to post his stuff sometimes, but he's never He's not doing it in a way that's self-promoting. He's trying to do it cuz he wants to get the message out. He wants people to understand the physics. He's like, "Look at all this work I did. People should just be reading it.

It's right there." You know. So, when he's coming out and he's saying, "Look at what Ashton Forbes is saying about reverse time travel." Which is just something I mentioned the other day. I think a lot of people I realized a lot of people are getting engagement and a lot of people are interested in this topic of is time travel real? And if so, how does it work?

And I think I can lend some insights into that. And the fact that Salvatore Pais has been pushing this, which he's going to explain here in a second, leads me to believe there might be a little bit more going on than just him speculating here. The thing that's consistent about Salvatore Pais is it always feels like there's a little something that's not being told. With regards to his five UFO patents, which let's just be honest, they're UFO patents. Fusion reactor, superconductivity, inertial mass reduction, gravity beams. I mean, what do you want here?

It's It's It's alien He's got those, and then when he was talking about AI, he's also obsessed with the triarchy of sentience and how we can make a sentient AI. And also the idea of, well, if we break the arrow of time, can you go in any direction? Leads me to believe he's not just opinionated, but perhaps has some insights that are perhaps not public knowledge. Perhaps classified. So, because of this, and actually because of this clip, I've been Not only is that the reason the topic tonight, but I've been racking my brain about it. About, okay, how could it really be possible?

How could reverse time travel be possible? So, let's listen. >> Personally, think we are, yeah. >> From a physical perspective, remember our parts on weapons of time, the idea I expounded to you? [clears throat] That starts extremely easy. Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. From there, you can deduce that minus delta T can be on the order of delta frequency, right? Divided by frequency squared. And that dimension is constant.

That has to do with breaking the Schwinger limit. With >> Okay. Nobody understood what he said there. Let's just be honest, everybody's pretending like we understood what he said, but nobody really understood what he said there. So, I went and did the work. I went and did the work to understand it for you guys.

So, what he's saying is that as we ramp up the frequency then the interval of time shrinks. And that makes sense. As we ramp up the the frequency, the interval of time shrinks. And what that means is exactly what I've been telling you, time is a dial. You can change the flow and the rate of time. Because changing that interval is exactly that.

When you're changing the frequency and changing the interval of time, you're changing the dial of time. And how fast time is flowing. Slower or faster. But here's the problem. If you look at that math, that math approaches infinity but never breaks it. Think about that.

It approaches infinity. You can turn the dial up, but it never breaks it. So, we have a problem. Technically, yes. In this theory, you can change the rate of time, but you can't break it entirely. But Sal adds something else.

He says, "You can break the Schwinger limit." That's what he's saying right here in this clip right now. So, he's saying there is a mechanism. There is a mechanism like the dial breaks. That's the key. The simple math says you can approach infinity but not get there.

But Sal's saying the dimensionless constant, perhaps there is a way where the Schwinger limit can be breached. And nature will spontaneously reorganize. AKA space-time will spontaneously reorganize. >> You've had pods on this. >> Oh, yeah. I've Oh, I've got slides and stuff. Absolutely. Fair enough. >> It is possible to reverse temp- And there was a recent uh I believe it was even spoken about in in Popular Mechanics, the September-October issue of 2026.

Look carefully. >> Oh. >> In in the European Journal C, European Journal of Physics C, there was a paper published that speaks that under incredibly high energy densities, aka a neutron star, a new type of entropy can come into being called gravitational entropy, that unlike what we understand as regular entropy, does not increase with the arrow of time. It actually redirects it. We're talking about negentropy becoming feasible. Look, there's a really short and yet >> So, what is Sal saying here? Negentropy. Well, if we think of entropy in terms of thermodynamics, we think of hot flowing to cold.

That would be entropy, right? Hot always flows to cold, cold can never flow to hot. Just basic thermodynamics. So, what Sal's saying here is under extreme conditions, conditions that we might find in a neutron star, which is like the most energy density stuff that we see in the in the gal in the universe, he's saying that this law of entropy can be broken. Hot can suddenly flow to cold. That we can get negentropy.

This perfectly aligns with all of the Unlab, I'm going to say that again, the Unlab Charles Chase videos that we reviewed about a year ago. Check out the live streams. Those were some of the best live streams ever from a science perspective. Specifically the one where they look into Unruh radiation and whether or not an accelerating body sees the background bath is warming up. Basically the same idea here. And they look at that and they say, "Well, under extreme conditions it might be possible for cold to flow to hot from the outside perspective to change the thermodynamics." Now, why is this important?

Well, there's another entropy principle, the flow of time. Everything's always moving forward in the flow of time. There's a direct correlation to this idea of being able to go backwards in time. If we can reverse entropy, reverse thermodynamics, then can we reverse the flow of time as well? Hmm. And if so, what would that look like?

Perhaps and and interestingly enough, when we look at what would be required to make a warp driver, a wormhole, and a wormhole can lead to backwards in time travel, we find out we need the same conditions. We need extreme amounts of energy density. We need the energy density of Jupiter, they say, in order to create curvature, to create these warps in space-time. I'm going to let him finish this.

I think he says something else here. >> A very good article on it, Popular Mechanics, September-October issue 2026, speaks to this paper that was published in the European Journal Physics C. >> I'll try to find that. >> there you'll A friend of mine that tapped me on Gmail, his name is Hassan Foreman. He's he's a good guy. I believe uh >> Okay. So, >> [clears throat] >> what if I told you that this has been verified? What if I told you that in the last 24 hours I found a national laboratory scientific paper that corroborates this with not theoretical but experimental data.

It's almost like the heavens opened up and the CIA made Brookhaven National Laboratory post this on social media. Quite literally couldn't believe it when I was reading it and I said, does this prove what Salvatore Pais said in that podcast 2 days ago? I'm pretty sure it does. Pretty sure it does, chat. Here we go. Let me pull it up.

Uh Trying to make sure I got the right one here. This is it. Brookhaven National Laboratory They have this on their Twitter as well somewhere. I think I retweeted it if you want to find it. But here it is. R I R H I C reports new data from high-density nuclear matter.

High-density nuclear matter. All I love all of those words. Those are all words that we enjoy. Keep going. >> [clears throat] >> Scientists using the STAR detector to study particle collisions at the relativistic high ion collider or heavy ion collider They have a relativistic heavy ion collider? You guys keep thinking they haven't figured out fusion. These are just like all the words involved in fusion, by the way.

Okay. They found an intriguing dip in their data in a relatively unexplored region in the nuclear phase diagram. A map of how nuclear matter behaves under various conditions of temperatures and density. The dip in the data appears The dip appears in the data tracking collision by collision variations in the momentum of particles emerging from collisions between gold nuclei. Near their lowest collision energies. These are the collisions that create the highest density nuclear matter, and they may indicate something interesting is happening in that dense region of the phase diagram.

So, they're saying they found something weird, and they found it in the densest regions of their little plasma research they were doing here. Cuz that's what this is, this is a plasma research, right? Okay. The RHIC, which is a Department of Energy lab for nuclear physics research, from 2000 to 2026, designed to create exotic forms of matter, including quark-gluon plasma. Eric Davis specifically spoke about the quark-gluon plasma. And don't they all refer to negative energy as exotic matter?

What does exotic matter mean here exactly? Exotic forms of matter, what does that mean? Does that mean negative energy? Because everybody refers to negative energy as exotic matter. I'm just asking questions, chat. Just asking questions.

Anyway, the quark-gluon plasma that existed in the very early universe, and that approaches the density of neutron stars. Look, I can only lead a horse to water. I can't make you all drink. So, I've set the stage here. Salvatore Pais said we can reverse the laws of thermodynamics under the densities of neutron stars. And now here's research where they're literally replicating neutron stars in the laboratory.

And they found an anomalous result. What do you guys think the anomalous result's going to be? Any guesses in the chat? Remember, I always write about everything. Okay. Um Exploring whether such a change in transition behavior exists and if so, where a hypothesized critical point demarcating this change is located in the nuclear phase diagram has been a long sought goal of physicists researching at the RHIC. They're talking about a phase transition here.

They're talking about some form of reorganization. When they say this, what do they mean? This is like water converting into ice. The thing about water converting into ice is it happens all at once. If the temperature is below 32, it's ice. If it's above 32, it's a liquid.

And once you hit that critical thresh point, it changes. That's how space time works, too. The reason why space time looks normal all the time is the same reason. But if you hit a phase transition, boom. Suddenly, you can get spontaneous reorganization. You say, "Well, Ashton, what is What is spontaneous reorganization look like?"

What do you mean? You saw it. You watched it with your eyes. What does spontaneous reorganization look like? There it is. You break the string limit, force space time to spontaneously reorganize, and now that plane is somewhere else.

You just reorganize that space time into a different location. That's your spontaneous reorganization right there. Okay. That's not even the best part. Keep going. >> [clears throat] >> Okay, so they're mapping these energy conditions. Scanning this, blah blah blah.

And then they check out these energy conditions here. And look at this over here on the right. Look at this dip that they see. Um what does it say? The star scientists measured how much each particle's momentum deviated from the average and then compared those deviations from collision to collision because particles that come from hotter matter carry more momentum on average. This comparison tracks how much temperature of the fireball changes from one collision to the next.

This momentum correlation measurement gives us an experimental window into temperature fluctuations. We use this as a proxy. As reported in the paper, the momentum fluctuations fall steeply as the collision energies rise from 3 giga electron volts. It reaches a minimum around 5.2 to 7.7 and then climbs at higher energy. The departure from a smooth trend has a significance about five sigma. The scientific standard for declaring such a deviation to be statistically significant.

So, remember, we just went over a video that Sabine Hossenfelder was going reviewing or a scientific paper that said that they had reached four sigma, which is 99.99%. These people are claiming they've reached five sigma, which is probably 99.9999%. A legitimate five sigma finding. So, what does this mean? Statistically, you can't just throw this out as an anomaly. There's actually something real here happening.

Uh let's see. Now, what do they say about temperature? It says something about reversing the temperature here. I don't want to read this whole thing cuz Okay, well, I guess we have no choice here. Okay. Yeah, it's only one or a couple more paragraphs.

The critical [clears throat] suppression. Suppression is what the the critical point scenario predicts. How much system's temperature varies depending on heat capacity, how much heat it must absorb before a temperature budges. A large heat capacity means a steady temperature and small fluctuations. Near a critical point, theory predicts heat capacity should grow dramatically. Matter can soak up this energy.

Beyond this critical point, higher energy densities physicists expect something different again, a first-order phase transition. That's an abrupt phase change like those familiar in everyday life like heat or like ice. Add heat to a glass of ice and the water temperature changes at 32. Look, exact same thing I said. Okay. Um Okay, where is the thing?

Okay, while the dip in momentum uh temperature fluctuation is consistent with other possible hints in the critical point behavior seen in the stars at other energies, the STAR system is careful to say that new data is needed. Okay, I did I miss the part here? But basically, what they see here is they see the reverse in thermodynamics. What they're seeing here is they're seeing that the the temperature is actually going down, not going up. And my first question is, well, wait a minute. Isn't this exactly what Salvatore Pais is saying?

Is it we're seeing a potential reverse in thermo uh dynamics and after a phase point is reached? So, let's go to let's go to our friend AI. Oh, where is it? Where is it? Here we go. I think this is it.

Hey, can you read back that comparison between the uh Salvatore Pais theory about neutron stars and the reversal of entropy and the new finding on the Brookhaven National Laboratory have found a dip in the energy level? >> Pais' claim is that at neutron star densities, negentropy becomes accessible, entropy locally decreasing instead of increasing. The Brookhaven STAR result is gold nuclei collided at RHIC's lowest beam energies, 3 to 8 GeV, which produces the densest matter ever made on Earth, approaching neutron star compression. Transverse momentum fluctuations fall from 3 GeV, volts, bottom out between 5.2 and 7.7, then climb again.

Five sigma deviation from the expected smooth curve. The lab calls it a possible critical point on the nuclear phase diagram. Sal's frame calls it the signature you'd expect if negentropy is opening up at that density. The South African GR paper sits in between. It shows mathematically that during neutron star collapse, the gravitational entropy arrow runs backward, while the thermodynamic arrow runs forward. So, you've got three independent threads.

Sal's theoretical claim, a curvature calculation confirming opposing arrows at that density, and an experimental anomaly at exactly that regime. None of them prove each other, but they all point at the same place. Woo! [screaming] Okay, I realized why I was confused. There was a third paper. The South African one she's referencing is the one that Sal's talking about in that interview. That's the one that looks at the neutron stars and sees the reversal of of entropy.

So, not only do we have a scientific paper that Sal was referencing, but then we also have Sal talking about being able to reverse time and that this shows that we can change the laws of physics or reverse them under the right conditions. And then we also have Brookhaven National Laboratory dropping their their science going, "Look, there's an anomalous dip right here." Pretty sweet. Let's go back to some Jean-Luc Picard. Let's learn a little bit more. That's crazy to me.

Wow. I don't know how anybody can still deny what we've been doing here. Pretty crazy. Um where's my [clears throat] thing? Oh, yeah. The research, absolutely undeniable, man.

Here's another clip. Okay, now since we're talking about time travel, we need to talk about this episode called Tapestry. One of the best episodes ever in Star Trek, and Star Trek talks about time travel multiple times. The episode Tapestry, what if you were given an opportunity to do over your past? To change things. Would you do it?

Would you go back in time and fix the things that you messed up? Maybe you marry a girl that you broke up with. Maybe you avoid getting in a fight that you regret. Or do you live with the mistakes of your past? That is the question of Tapestry. Jean-Luc Picard, played by the legendary Patrick Stewart, is given exactly that choice.

He his heart fails. And because he has an artificial heart because he was stabbed as a child in a bar acts in a bar fight, his life is on the line. And Q gives him a choice. Q gives him the opportunity and says, "Do you want to go back in time and undo those mistakes you did because you were a stupid kid and you didn't know better?" And he says, "Yeah. Let me go do it.

I'm That'd be great. I can't wait." But what happens? He goes back in time. He changes the things that he did wrong. But then, there's a horrible side effect.

He's no longer the person he was. He's no longer the captain of the Enterprise anymore. Now, he's just a science officer. Because he would never took the risks that it required. Made the sacrifices, made the mistakes required. Just like he told Data, sometimes you can do everything right and you can still lose.

In this case, our mistakes, our past, are who we are. And if we throw those away, we are no longer the person we are anymore. So, here you go. One of the greatest clips ever. >> Jean-Luc Picard. >> Man, how weird does it look when he's wearing that blue? Just doesn't look right. >> Having a good laugh now, Q? Does it amuse [music] you to think of me living out the rest of my life as a dreary man in a tedious job?

I gave you something most mortals never experienced. A second chance at life. And now all you can do is complain? I can't live out my days as that person. That man is bereft of passion and imagination. THAT IS NOT WHO I am.

Au contraire. He's the person you wanted to be. One who was less arrogant and undisciplined in his youth. One who was less like me. The Jean-Luc >> I like So, I got to point out two things here. Number one, this episode shook me, chat.

I haven't seen this episode for probably 15 years, 20 years, and I still remember like the back of my hand. It's like a core memory, basically. But also how Q just did this cuz he took this personally. Q just Q's one of my favorite characters cuz he's super flawed, but he has god-like powers. He's like, "Bitch, you told me you're like me?" He said, "You didn't want to be like me?

Oh, okay. Well, I'll go back and you can you can take all the me out of you." And when he does, he becomes a little Picard becomes a little and he's like, "Oh, okay, I was wrong. I was wrong." And you're like, "What?" >> Picard, you wanted to be the one who did not fight the Nausicaan. Had quite a different career from the one you remember.

That Picard never had a brush with death. Never came face to face with his own mortality. Never realized how fragile life is or how important each moment must be. So, his life never came into focus. He drifted through much of his career. No plan or agenda.

Going from one assignment to the next. Never seizing the opportunities that presented themselves. He never led the away team on Milika 3 to save the ambassador. Take charge of Stargazer's bridge when its captain was killed. And no one ever offered him a command. He learned to play it safe.

And he never ever got noticed by anyone. >> Jesus. Jeez. That That speech will break anyone. I mean, put yourself in that scenario where you get given a chance to do it over and then you do it over and you hate everything about it. I mean, that that's going to low-key make you just want to end it all. My goodness.

Holy But why is it so important? Because look at us. Look at us in this moment. Would we even be here right now if I hadn't taken the leap and the chance on the MH370 videos? If I hadn't said, "Wait a minute. What if these videos are real?

What if these people saying these videos are VFX from the '90s? What if those people are just full of What if those people are morons?" And to be honest with you guys, I a risk. A risk that I've been paying the consequences ever since and I'm probably will for the rest of my life. But if I hadn't done that, I wouldn't be the person I am today. Even this journey has changed me from the person I was 3 years ago to the person I am today.

And I think a lot of you have gone through a similar journey. Where you have gone a trans undergone a transformation from the learning and of the truth about this technology, the science, what the government's capable of doing. I think a lot of you have grown as well. And the lesson we should learn is we shouldn't look back. We should just look forward. I always try to improve.

So let's see how Picard responds to getting basically dressed down. And And part of the reason why I can't disconnect Patrick Stewart from Jean-Luc Picard is because he does such a great job of acting. He becomes the character in every scene. >> You're right, Q. You gave me the chance to change and I took the opportunity. But I admit now it was a mistake. Are you asking me for something, Jean-Luc?

Give me a chance to put things back the way they were before, before you died in sick bay. Is that what you want? I'd rather die as the man I was than live the life I just saw. >> Hell yeah. Deals with it like a man. He doesn't come out Imagine if that was a woman. Sorry, I may be a little misogynist. She would have said, "It's not my fault. I didn't do anything wrong.

That guy stabbed me and I didn't even want to be be in it." The woman would have been saying, "It's none of it's my fault. I don't care. None of I don't know exactly." But, instead, Jean-Luc Picard says, "You're right. I messed up. I screwed up, and I learned a lesson.

A valuable one. One that I didn't want to re-undo it. I shouldn't have been so arrogant about who I am." He says, "Give me another chance. I'll make it right. I would rather die as the person I am now than go back and be the person I was before."

And I feel that in my soul, and you probably feel it in your soul, too. You think I'm going back to being asleep in the Matrix? There's no way in hell. No, no, no, no, no. That's not happening. There is no going back. >> Coward, like all Starfleet. You talk, and you [music] talk, but you have no gumba. >> Bro, did you You did not just say I have no gumba?

No, you didn't, son. No, you didn't, tooth face. Tusk face over here just said, "You ain't got no gumba." Uh-uh. You going to stand for that? >> What did you say? >> I said, "You are a coward." >> Mhm. That's what I thought you said. >> Mhm.

And butter his face. He's got that old man's strength. Oh, chat. This is why you can never trust in the Mekkian or whatever this guy is called. Whatever weird face tusk face guy is called. Look stab you in the back.

Stab you in the back like a dirty ass rat. But at least he didn't end up being a loser, Chad. And what's his response? This is just the best response ever. I want this had to be I wonder if this was in the script or if he just improves this. >> His vital signs are stable. >> Bravo, sir. Bravo.

Wow. Just laughs. Laughs as he's being killed. And at that point the best part is you don't know if he's going to live. You think oh well he's actually just going to die, right? Like he's uh you know he's he's fine with dying.

He's like I'm cool with it. And he ends up living in the end. Awesome. So awesome, Chad. Okay. Next clip. [clears throat] Next Salvatore Pais clip.

Where is it? Um Oh, actually this isn't even necessarily a Salvatore Pais clip. This is just a good one in general. >> [clears throat] >> And Andrea asks this one. Here we go. Oh, wait. There it is. >> Definitely. >> I'm pretty sure they know that.

I I I think they know I >> I think they've already cracked it, Andrea. >> I agree. I think >> I think that what Ashton Forbes >> Oh. >> shows with his three orbs >> Yeah. Yeah. >> orbiting the MH370 >> Yeah. >> aircraft and how should I say zapping it out of what we understand as three-dimensional existence is real. >> The question though is >> Me, too. >> Why? Why? >> orbs would have to have AI autonomy. >> Yeah, or absolutely. Why >> He brings up a really good point there. Those orbs would have to have AI autonomy.

They have to. Those orbs flying around that plane, MH370 in 2014, are using AI. 100%. That's autopilot, baby. But autopilot to the next degree. And so, it you see how many systems are being revealed by just one or I guess two technically military videos of one operation.

Look how much advanced technology the government is hoarding. They've got surveillance capabilities that the public doesn't know about. No one even understood what the hell Whammy meant, wide area motion imagery. It's not just cameras recording from above anymore. Now they've got cameras that are taking photos and they can build video from it. You realize how powerful that is?

They've got fusion reactors flying around being controlled by AI. Fusion reactors flying around manipulating gravity controlled by AI. And it's all Department of Energy And apparently they're just jerking off with the CIA. It's going down to San Diego jerking each other off, CIA and the DOE. You want some fusion reactors for your black operations? Oh, yeah, we'd love that.

Oh, yeah. Thank you. Oh my god, chat. Okay, anyway, but here's the the significant part. >> Are they not taking Ashton Forbes channel down? >> Because Ashton is not only extremely good at communication, but I think he truly is. I think he's mastered the understanding of this physics. >> That's a great Dude, that's like the highest praise anybody in my life has ever given me. Uh thank you.

Wow. But he's right about one thing there though. I don't know if he's right about me mastering the physics. It feels like we're getting a little bit close. But it's about the method of communication. Look around and honestly, you guys can watch my content, watch my live streams and realize right away that whether or not you like me or don't like me, I'm really good at communicating science to people.

Information in general, but definitely science, physics. That's the main reason. They all suck at that. Look at Jay Stratton out there trying to reveal I don't even know what the hell he's trying to reveal. It doesn't come across as genuine. He gets on the biggest platforms ever and makes almost no impact.

If you think about the cost to benefit analysis, someone like me, when I go on a big show, it gets massive impact. When someone like those guys go on the shows, they don't doesn't seem organic, doesn't seem natural, so they don't really get the same impact. So to what a degree what I've been revealing, they're okay with it. They actually want some of this to be revealed. They don't want all of it to be revealed. I don't think they're super happy with everything that I'm saying.

But you know, I would say we're I'm walking a fine line. A fine line between, okay, I'm going to do it my way and reveal what I want, but I'm also doing some things that are kind of helping them and and their goals of revealing whatever alien technology, whatever their their thing is. So I think that's one aspect of why haven't they why haven't I gotten the call, you know, to shut up, or to on board, or whatever they do, I don't know. But there's another aspect to it here as well. Here we >> of disclosure.

No, but part of disclosure in a way is for an introduction >> Yeah. >> the masses, the slaves >> This >> to this quote-unquote revolutionary physics. You and >> So, think about that right there. A big part of this disclosure is actually revealing revolutionary physics to the slaves, to the masses. That's actually what it is. And that basically has not been getting done at all. There has been no one doing what I'm doing right now, trying to push essentially physics onto people.

Not push alien stories, be like, "Warp drives are real. Believe it." Not, "Here is green aliens. Believe it." No, believe in warp drives, believe in wormholes, believe in free energy microchips. They're not doing that at all.

So, I think to another degree, you might say, "Well, it might be like a wait and see. Let's just see how this plays out. This seems to be moving us towards our goals of disclosure, which is the revolu- the the reveal of this technology." Now, they they would speak about it. I think you can find all of these UFO people will occasionally talk about the revolutionary technologies that come along with disclosure. But it's never the focus.

It's always about aliens or the abductions, and all these other things that is tangential to the technology. For my alien lovers, I like to throw you a bone. I get so much hate from the alien people sometimes. The truth about the technology will lead to the truth about aliens. We shouldn't even bother with the alien question. Because not because it doesn't matter.

Ultimately, of course, whether or not aliens exist matters. It doesn't matter in the context of free energy because free energy and and warp drives will lead to the reveal of the alien question. Now, my personal opinion is we're going to find out the alien question is basically a lie. We're going to find out that aliens are completely different than what we've been predicting. That the aliens we think are interacting with us are probably a super hyper advanced machine intelligence of some sort. Maybe something even weirder than that.

But, that's my opinion. Okay, let's listen to the rest here. >> And know that this is not new physics. This is just an old perspective. Or rather a new perspective on old physics. It's just a new way of looking at things. >> That's it. Why are they Why are they allowing Ashton to continue doing this?

What do they There has to be a There has to be an operation behind that. Otherwise, he would be silenced. He's not being silenced. >> What if they're camps? [clears throat] What if they're camps? What if they're warring camps in this disclosure agenda? >> Yeah, I I I agree. >> The white hats versus the mystery of the iniquity fellas? >> That goes back to That's what you >> Anyway. >> [laughter] >> So, that right there I think is it. And you know the funny part is, the more I've thought about this, what would the camps be?

I think I've weirdly aligned myself with the camp that's revealing none of it. I think politically I'm aligned with the people that that are the the ultimate gatekeepers. The ones that say, "We don't want any of this to be out there." The Ron Pandolfis of the world, as I would call them. Or maybe he wants some of it, I don't know. Maybe that's not fair.

And then you have the woke disclosure crew that I call them, which is, [clears throat] you know, the the Dan Farrah and the whole the whole crew of the people that do all the movies every single time. And those people just want the alien thing to come out. Those people I don't think want free energy and warp drives to come out. That's why I think they're at odds with Steven Greer. Cuz look at it like this. If the Dan Farrah woke disclosure people, if they really wanted free energy and warp drives, wouldn't they be perfectly aligned with Steven Greer?

It seems like they would be exactly aligned. The only difference is Steven Greer is saying is that it's mostly our technology and humans are using this technology and that it's free energy and it's teleportation. He repeats that all the time. And that leads me to believe that what's really going on is that that camp is also with the government. All the camps that are involved in UFO disclosure are actually working with the government. There aren't any camps that are like purely grassroots other than us.

We're the only one. Only camp that's grassroots. So there are some camps and and this dynamic what does this dynamic do? This dynamic works in our favor in a major way. Because now the various factions might have different opinions on what to do with Ashton Forbes. One faction might be like, you know what?

It's not really that big of a problem. You know, we don't really like what he's doing, but he's he's revealing some of the stuff we want. And the other faction is like, well, we'd like to stop him, but hey, we agree with him politically. That'd be pretty funny. >> [laughter] >> So I don't know. Truth is, I don't know, guys. I don't know what the ultimate answer is, but I find it just as interesting as you guys do.

Because the reality is there are people hiding this technology. It is very very real and it's very and it's out there. Let's do another uh Let's do another Picard clip. We'll have a little uh Jean-Luc Picard night tonight. Here you guys go. Oh, that's not it.

I like this one a lot. This is the first time that Picard ever met Captain Kirk. And their interaction is so wholesome. It's so wholesome quirk chungus as they say. Listen to this. >> Captain of the Enterprise. >> That's right. Close to retirement? >> I'm not planning on it. >> Let me tell you something.

Don't. Don't let them promote you. Don't let them transfer you. Don't let them do anything that takes you off the bridge of that ship because while you're there, you can make a difference. >> Come back with me. >> Bro, this I I'm going to cry tonight. First of all, I love the first part of that. Don't ever let them take you off the Enterprise.

Why? Because you can make a difference. They wanted They wanted Picard to become an admiral. He's like, "No." But really, what's the subtext? The subtext there is this is the best time of your life. You are living your dream and you don't even realize it.

That's what Kirk is trying to tell Picard right there. He's saying, "You want my advice? You don't even have to think about it. No, don't accept the position. Don't take the admiral role. Don't do it.

Stay as a head of Stay as a head of the captain of the ship. You're doing it." And I feel that in my soul because that's what we're doing right now. We are living in the moment of disclosure and when the history books are written and they look back, that's how they'll write it. They were already We were already revealing it. The world just didn't realize.

And we'll look back and we'll be like, "Oh yeah, we were living through it. We were actually living through it every day, live-streaming it three times a week. So, appreciate it while we have it. You're living it right now. People are going to think back to the good old days. Those good old days are right now. >> I was stuck, Saavik.

Make a difference again. >> And I love this part because you know what you're expecting in your heart right now. He says, "Hey, come back. Come back with me. We can do it again." And you're expecting Kirk to say, "Nah, I'm good. I've had my chance.

No need." >> Who am I to argue with the captain [music] of the Enterprise? What's the name of that planet? Viridian III? >> Yes. >> I take it the odds are against us. The situation is grim. >> You could say that. >> And if Spock were here, he'd say that I was an irrational, illogical human being for taking on a mission like that. Sounds like fun. >> Let's go, baby. Oh, man.

That is just the best, dude. Sounds like fun. Let's go, baby. Isn't that the story, though? You guys want to reveal a missing airplane? You want to reveal free energy and teleportation?

Well, I'll tell you what. It probably means we're going to die. It probably means they're going to try to destroy our lives, discredit us, do anything they can do to make sure it doesn't happen. Sounds like fun. Sounds like fun. Let's go, guys.

Woo. Star Trek quotes all night. Who would have thought it? Who would have thought it? Now, [snorts] I got [clears throat] more. I'm going to do another one.

I'm going to talk a little bit about time travel. Okay. >> [cough and clears throat] >> This one is probably my favorite. One I've had the clip of ready to go uh for many years. And you got to forgive my if I have uh closed captions on some of these, you'll have to forgive them. Because back in the day, they didn't have automatic closed captioning on everything. >> I can't remember. >> You think we've come so far. >> Oh, this one doesn't have it. >> Torture of heretics, burning of witches, it's all ancient history.

Then before you can blink an eye, suddenly it threatens to start all over again. >> I believed her. I I helped her. I did not see what she was. >> Mr. Worf, villains who twirl their mustaches are easy to spot. Those who clothe themselves in good deeds are well camouflaged. >> I I think after yesterday, people will not be so ready to trust her. >> Maybe. But she or someone like her will always be with us, waiting for the right climate in which to flourish, spreading fear in the name of righteousness. Vigilance, Mr. Worf.

That is the price we have to continually pay. >> I love this one. I can't remember the all the exact story of the episode, but I know Worf gets deceived by I think it was two factions having a court case or something like that. And Worf basically falls for disinformation.

And the big lesson here is one that we learn every single day, especially if you are conservative in this country, is that you realize the people that are out there virtue signaling, saying how good they are, and how moral and just they are, a lot of times you find out those are the most evil people of all. Because people realize that all they have to do is pretend. All they have to do is say that they're virtuous and that you'll praise them. And then you'll just take them at face value, regardless of their real actions and what they really do.

We call that being a Democrat. It's called being a Democrat, chat. But in all honesty, that's what you see all the time. This is what we call wokeness. Is when people go out there and they say, "Oh, I'm anti-genocide. You're not anti-genocide?

Holy you must be evil." That's just called virtue signaling. Everybody's anti-genocide. The argument is that you're framing the conflict as a genocide when it's not. Or they'll say, "Oh, I love I love Black Lives Matter. I'm a I'm virtuous."

Okay, but what do you actually do for black people? This is like when Hasan the other day said, "I've spent my whole career fighting white supremacy." What the are you talking about? Name one thing you've ever done to fight white supremacy. What the hell does that mean? You sat on TV, you sat and and you basically called everybody a Nazi?

That doesn't That's not fighting white supremacy. That's just virtue signaling. That's not doing anything. But that's what being a virtue signaling villain is. People realize you can just say anything. Like that guy Same guy, Hasan claims that he's a he's a communist that loves socialism while he's wearing $1,000 Gucci glasses.

So, a complete contradiction to the idea of his supposed ideology. You would think that if somebody is a communist socialist, they would want to give their money away, and they would want to dress down to be like the people because they believe that everybody's equal. They wouldn't want to dress better than everybody and have all their status always appear to be higher. That's That's capitalism. It's the exact opposite. So, what you realize is don't judge people by their words.

Judge them by their actions. Judge them by their behaviors. And when you do that, you'll realize a lot of these people are entirely phony. People that say they're against fraud that have turned an entire blind eye to fraud and never convicted any fraudsters. So, pretty solid. And And to a degree, both parties do lie.

You should take it on a case-by-case basis. There's Republicans that I don't like that are also guilty because it's a politician's thing. And also, the Republicans and conservatives have their own problem. Right now, we have a problem called the woke right. Where we have people that have infiltrated the right wing and they pretend to be conservatives for the whole point of just driving a wedge in the current administration. And then they let the mask slip and they start calling Trump the Antichrist. Let me address one real quick thing as well before we go back to [clears throat] that.

Some people said, "Oh, Ashton, aren't you in like a beef with Tucker Carlson?" Number one, I have no control over where Shadow Figure sold the TV show to. Number two, I've always said I'll talk to anybody. If Tucker Carlson hit me up right now and said, "Ashton, you want to come talk about MH370 on my podcast?" I'd say, "Yes." I'd say, "Yes."

He'd probably ask me not to challenge him on all the stuff that he's been talking about because I probably would. I'd be like, "Bro, why are you saying that Trump's the Antichrist? Come on, man. Come on, man. Get on Get on board with the program, bro." Um but I'll still talk to him.

I don't care. I'll talk to anybody. It's not It's not me that's afraid to talk to people that I disagree with. That should be pretty obvious at this point. I am I am wound up and ready to go and ready to debate basically anybody on anything. Okay?

That's where we're at. Let's do another clip. This might be the last Picard clip. Another classic one and this one does have the subtitles. I apologize. So for my people who don't appreciate that.

But you guys are going to know this one. Okay, I'll set the stage. Jean-Luc Picard has been captured by the Kardashians. Yes, Kim Kardashian captured Captain Picard and they tortured him. They made him watch their reality show for days and days and days and as you can see it broke him like it would break anyone. It would break me, chat.

It would break me. And now they have been brainwashed him after they broke him down and essentially all they have to do is get him to say that there's five lights even when he can see there's clearly only four lights. They've gaslit him so hard with garbage real What do they call it? Real TV drama garbage Kardashian stuff that they've gaslit him to the point where they're ready to make him believe anything. And the question is how much willpower does Captain Picard have? Oh, he's got a lot, Chad.

He's got a lot. >> That won't help. I have many more. Still, felt good. >> Enjoy your good feelings while you can. There may not be many more of them. I've just received word there's been a battle. The Enterprise is burning in space.

The invasion of Minos Korva has been successful. >> You don't believe >> There's no need for any further information from you. Our troops were successful in spite of your refusal to help me. You might have saved yourself a great deal of torment by yielding at the beginning. >> I won't see neutral representing. >> So, what's crazy about this is that he's gaslighting the whole time here. But, Picard has no way of knowing what's the truth. He's locked up. And so, he's coming back and he's saying, I think they were also claiming that they were going to execute him.

And so, they're like, look, okay, we got no more point for you. We're just going to execute you now, you know? So, you can sit there and you can imagine if you were in Gitmo and they're just gaslighting you and they're being like, yeah, we killed your whole family. They're dead now. Or we've captured them, kidnapped them. We can do whatever we want to them.

You can you imagine how terrified you'd be? And there he is, he's basically saying, we just You know, the Enterprise is burning, all your friends are dead. It's all over. Like, can you imagine the psychological toll of you're wondering if that's true or not? So, the Cardassians are mentally torturing him. And they had been torturing him for a long time here, brutally. >> There is no such person. >> The word will be that you perished with your crew.

No one will ever know that you You here with us as you will be for a long long time. >> I mean, this is messed up, dude. So, the while he's telling them this, the Enterprise is like desperately looking for him. And so, he's being told they've given up on you. They have no idea where you're at. Now, he's being told they all got destroyed. And he's like, "Yeah, we're just going to tell the story that you were on the ship that got destroyed, and you're going to be here as a prisoner forever.

We're just going to torture you forever." Jesus. Brutal. CNN's chief executive >> You do, however, have a >> There he is, chat. CNN's chief executive right there. This is where they This is where they get their ideas from. >> choice.

You can devote your life in misery, held here, subject to my whims. Or you can live in comfort with good food and warm clothing, women as you desire them, allowed to pursue your studies of philosophy and history. I would enjoy debating with you. You have a keen mind. It's up to you. A life of ease, of reflection, and intellectual challenge. Or this. >> What must I do? >> Nothing, really.

Tell me how many lights you see. >> What's crazy, you might say, "Well, why is he just saying you just have to tell me how many lights there are?" Because that's basically the trigger. Now, you may say, "Ah, shut up. There's no way. That's That's not how it works. You can't just make one person believe one thing and have complete control over them."

That's actually exactly how it works. That's actually exactly how hypnotism works, too. In hypnotism, the moment you have control over them, you just have control over them. You say, "I don't believe you." I didn't believe it either until I saw with my own eyes. When I saw people being hypnotized with my own eyes and realized those people gave themselves over willingly.

That's how hypnotism works if you don't know. It works because you give yourself over willingly and then they have absolute control over you. By thought power of suggestion, purely by power of suggestion. And that's what they're doing here. They're breaking Captain Picard and all they want him to do is to say that there's five lights when there's only four. So that they'll have power of suggestion and control over his mind. is crazy, man.

They don't They don't make shows like this anymore. >> How many? How many lights? This is your last chance. The gods are coming. Don't be stubborn fool. How many? >> You told me he would be ready to go. >> We had some unfinished business. >> So now what you find out right here is it turns out they already know that they've got him and they got to let him go.

So it turns out you didn't realize but the Kardashian guy is actually lying this whole time and he knows that he only has a very very short period of time before they have to let Picard go. They know that the whole gig is up. So that's why he's coming in with his last ditch gambit lying about the Enterprise being destroyed and everything like that. So essentially you realize right here in this exact moment that Picard only has to hold out for like a short while longer and he'll make it. >> Get him cleaned up. A ship is waiting to take him back to the Enterprise.

Captain Picard if you'll go with the guards, they'll take care of you. >> But now he's even he's questioning it because his mind is he's been lied to so much he's now even wondering is this another game? And he's going, "Wait a minute. No, it's not a game." He's realizing, "Holy this guy was just gaslighting me." He's like, "They actually did search for me. They never gave up on me and they found him." >> [screaming] >> That right there is why he's the superior captain.

You are not going to get William Shatner going to that level. He's good actor. But and you might say, "Ashton, William Shatner can yell." Yes, William Shatner can yell with the best of them. You can't do this. Wait Wait for it.

Wait for it. That right there, that's the move that puts it over the top. That's the aura firming move right there. Don't touch me. He definitely improved that That's not in the script. He's just like, dude came to touch him.

He's like, "No, I'm in the zone, baby. I'm in the zone. Don't touch me. I'm getting out of here. This guy is gaslighting me. Goodbye."

One more time. We actually might need this in slow mo. Perfect. 10 out of 10 acting, chat. That's called That's called a professional actor. Beautiful. [clears throat] Love it.

Okay. We've had a good memorial to Sir Patrick Stewart. Legendary actor. Taught us so many life lessons. And [snorts] now we want to learn a little bit about time travel. Is time travel possible?

Well, even if we can break the arrow of time, and even if time is a dial and we say, "Okay, well, we can just shatter the dial." How do we do that? Number one, the answer is we displace space-time. Like we see in the MH370 videos, the secret's not just to create a Jupiter gravity. We want the negative energy to be focused around the object. That's the secret of the triangle pattern in the orbs.

The null zone, just like Bob Greenyer, who I saw him in the chat, points out. So, we actually want to shape our explosive so that we create a bubble. We create a bubble that displaces space-time where the supposed negative energy requirement is concentrated along the boundary of the bubble. And if we do that, now we get around the equations and the math entirely. That's how you get around the issue of, "Well, we can change the dial, but how do we break through?" You don't really break through.

You create a You create a space-time bubble that displaces itself from the rest. That's what's happening from a physics perspective. But, okay. Let's say we've done that. And let's say that reverse entropy, negative entropy is possible. We just saw a scientific paper about it. Saw We saw Sal referencing it.

Can we still travel to the past? Previously, I've said, "No, we're not going to be able to do that because of the chronology protection theorem." Essentially, I think it was Stephen Hawking and a few others, very smart physicists, said, "We're not going to be able to go to the past because of the paradoxes that it causes." It's going to cause paradoxes, so nature is going to prevent it from happening. If we were able to go to the past, we would be able to you know, kill our grandparents, sleep with our grandparents, create a situation in which we have a paradox occur.

So, what's the answer to these paradoxes? Let's go ahead and assume for tonight that we can go back in time. How do we resolve these various paradoxes? I'll tell you straight up and you may not believe the answer, but the answer is we resolve the paradox by following the path where the only only logical conclusion can occur. What do I mean by that? I mean we can create closed loops.

Closed loops are allowed. If I go back in time and well, this is going to be hmm kind of want to come up with a uh example that's not going to be like incestuous, but if you go back in time and you create Oh, yeah, let's just use the um the play analogy. If I write a play and then I go back in time and give the play to myself or let's say I make a video game.

I make a video game and I give the video game back to myself back in time and now I go forward in time with the video game from the past and I go back and I complete the loop by going back in time again with the video game, who created the video game? You say, well, I you created it. You said you did, but actually I didn't. I just got it from myself. In theory, nobody created that video game. I got the video game from somebody in the future and then I gave the video game to somebody in the past when I got older.

That would be a closed loop. That's actually allowed. So, as long as we only create closed loops, we can time travel. So, what do I mean when I say we can only follow the path that is allowed? I mean if we went to the past, then we can go to the past. But, you can't change the past. You can only do what has already been written. So, think about it from that perspective.

If you think about time travel from that perspective, it is permissible to go to the past. But, you can only go to the past if you did go to the past. So, it is a little bit circular logic. But, that's what I mean. That's how it works. So, that means there's rules. I think John Kramer, I think I have the clip. Tom Hudson's probably thinking about it right now.

It's one of these. I think it's this one. >> I'm talking >> That's the right one. Sorry. Hopefully, I have it. This one? >> What says book Mark Millis and Eric Davis Davis Davis this book. >> We're going to watch this clip either way, I guess. It's about time travel.

Here we go. >> Uh I examined the implication I wrote a a chapter about the possibility of non-local communication, and I pointed out that if you could use non-local quantum entanglement to communicate, then in principle, you could do you could create time travel paradoxes in the the sense of sending information backwards in time. Uh and and I proceeded to analyze those paradoxes [clears throat] in the in the book.

Um and the conclusion was that uh uh probably there was there might be some show show stopper related to the uncertainty principle that might cause you to might prevent you from doing these kinds of this kind of signaling. But, if it if it was possible, then nature would probably re-re-re-re-re insist on some kind of self-consistent outcome that would would would not allow you to create a real paradoxical situation. There it is. He's saying the exact same thing. Well, I mean, it makes sense cuz I stole it from him. Nature will require a self-consistent answer.

So, as long as I pass the video game to myself, and then I go to the future and and pass it to myself, then there's nothing wrong with nature. Nature's fine with that being allowed. Crazy, huh? So, there may be real ways that we can interact with the past that are allowed by physics as long as we do it within a certain set of rules. Now, I bring this up because if this is true, then we are almost certainly going to figure this out in the future. So, here's a thought experiment.

If there is any path by which we can communicate with the past, then at some point in the future, we're going to figure it out. And we're going to communicate to the past. And if that's the case, then we're going to see those signs in our reality right now if they're communicating to us from the future. The problem is we have to learn and look for what those signs are. And we have to we can find out what those signs are by figuring out what the rules are in time travel.

It turns out it's not just Terminator go back in time to 1984 and start killing people. You can't do that, potentially. So, instead, we have to say, "Okay, well, wait a minute. If there are rules, then once we figure out how the rules work, then we can know what to look for if we want to look for signs of time travel." Now, one of those signs of time travel might be super hyper advancement. Look at how fast humans have advanced over just the last 100 years.

You could actually point at that from a larger scale and say this might be an indicator that there's something time travel going on here. How come we didn't advance this fast 10,000 years ago? How come it's only happening now? Is our is someone from the future interfering with our current present reality? Because in the future they figure out time travel. So here's the clip that Tom Hudson's thinking about.

Guys, not only do I know who you all are, I also have psychic powers. I'm a remote viewer. Credentialed. And I can see inside your minds and I know what you're thinking at all points in time, too. I've learned the abilities. Patrick Stewart died and gave me the Professor X abilities, chat.

Okay, here we go. Here's the clip, I found it. This is the one. Now think about what I just told you related to the rules about time travel. Now this random nerdy guy that looks like he just came out of an 80s television show, I don't know who this guy is, but he seems to know more about wormholes than basically everybody else on the planet. I guarantee you, by the way, he's seen every episode of the next generation.

I can just tell by looking at this poor man, I mean, that he's seen every episode. And by listening to how he speaks. So here you go. Great clip, though. >> Doctor. Hi John. Uh interesting, but your method for accelerating wormholes is unnecessarily complicated uh given conservation of momentum.

Uh all you have to do you don't actually have to put the wormhole into the accelerator. All you have to do is push momentum into one mouth of the wormhole and it shows up at the other mouth. >> Yeah, that's very true. >> So you can just change the back reaction thing. >> Bro, that is crazy, dude. He's like, "Hey, so it turns out conservation it actually works out really well here. Why? Because if conservation holds, then all we really have to do is force a phase transition and this plane is going to vanish over here and it's going to reappear over here.

That's why he's saying that all you have to do is push momentum through the wormhole and it'll keep it open. Once you push momentum through the wormhole, the object has to go somewhere else. So, it's going to reappear somewhere else. This guy This guy is wild. Where did this guy come from, dude? >> Yeah. So, you just shine the beam into one mouth then it accelerates the other mouth.

Okay, that's it. >> It's very very easy. >> You might have to do that for a while and but >> Yeah, well, you have to do it anyway because you have to have a certain amount of momentum accumulated. >> The guy trying to take the microphone from him just He's just sending me right now. The guy is trying to take the microphone from me. He's like, "Nah, there's no chance you're taking this microphone." >> Either way, but it's just a lot simpler if you don't try to charge the wormhole on accelerator.

Another comment, by the way, the wormhole that you were talking about spans a distance of about what, 1,500 light-years? And you said, "Well, you can't have a network of wormholes." But to a make sure you have chronology protection, nobody can have another wormhole uh traveling in the opposite direction through time in a distance of 1,500 light-years. So, once you've set up this wormhole network, you are preventing other people from setting up wormholes over a distance of 1,500 light-years.

And you can only do it if nobody has the opposite polarity uh time machine within that distance. >> Right. [clears throat] >> So, essentially >> Chat, this guy wormholes, chat. This guy Wow is right. This guy wormholes, bro. This dude has been through a few wormholes in his day. Uh and he's laying it down. These are the rules.

The rules are time and distance are the same thing. Think about that. Time and distance are the same thing because space and time are one in the same. So, what he's saying is when you start messing around with time travel, you create an actual distance barrier. Where now you can't have more than one wormhole. If you have more than one wormhole, you're going to break chronology.

If I send a wormhole in this direction and I appear over here, and I do another wormhole going back the other way, in theory I can go back in time and change the past. And what he's saying is that's not allowed. If you want chronology, causality to still hold, you can only do one-way wormhole, and you can't have one going back the other direction. Now, is this going to hold forever? Maybe not, but the point being, this is a framework by which we can go back in time without breaking the laws of causality, breaking the laws of nature. Hm.

And this is the reason why I have come back around on the idea of going to the past. I was actually really against it because of the idea of not of nature shutting it down. And now I'm realizing there are slim paths by which going back in time can totally work. In fact, do you want to know one of those paths right now? One of those possibilities is that our entire reality is somebody that went back in time. And that could be at multiple levels. That could mean the entire Big Bang or our entire universe only exists because someone went back in time.

That could also mean that our entire civilization only exists because someone went back in time. It could mean that this planet didn't have intelligent life on it. And then somebody went back in time, got trapped on this planet, and that we are literal aliens whose lineage is from the future. And that can be allowed under the right circumstances. As long as it doesn't break causality. And what we're seeing is the outcome of that.

Our entire existence could be because of somebody going back in time long ago, and we have no idea that it even happened. That could be our whole reality. And you want to know the messed up part about that? Is it if we undo that, we undo our reality. If we were to do the Jean-Luc Picard and go back in time and change that, our reality wouldn't exist anymore. This is the actual real plot of the TV show Dark.

I just spoiled it for you, but it's like a 10-year-old show. Maybe older. In the TV show Dark, it's a self-consistent time travel, and what happens is somebody goes to the past and they end up having children. They go to the past and they have children, and now those children are basically like time paradoxes. They only exist because they always existed. And if they were to go back and change the past, then children, people would no longer exist. Because if somebody doesn't get married and have kids in the past, now those kids never existed anymore.

And then they realize, holy this whole reality they've created is one big time loop. The whole reality in Dark is just one big time loop. And if they undo it, they undo themselves. Now, we're going to watch a little anime. This is definitely going to get me a copyright strike here. Oh, let's hold on.

Is there more to this? There might be a few more seconds of this. Let's watch the end. >> Actually, what you're proposing is an experiment to test how far away is the nearest extraterrestrial civilization that [laughter] has wormholes. So, if you set up a wormhole 1,000 >> And you blow them up in the process. >> Yeah. At the point Well, at the point where your wormhole blows up, you say, "Okay, that's how far away >> They are. Yes, that's the >> to the next nearest wormhole network. >> Right.

This is a completely new new approach to SETI. yes. >> I mean, this is crazy cuz that could be true. It's like, what if we figure out how to do wormholes? What if MH370 was a test? What if they were afraid that the wormhole was going to explode when they teleported MH370? What if they're like, "Hey, we don't really know if there's any wormholes nearby, but the theories show that it might explode if we try and there is. Uh, just give it a go.

See what happens." That would be the equivalent of being like, "Hey, the nuclear scientist said if we drop the atomic bomb it might detonate the atmosphere and just destroy everybody on Earth." Uh, let's give it a go. See what happens. Wow. Okay, one other show.

When we're talking about time travel and going back in time, there's an anime I always think about. It's called Unlimited Blade Works. Unlimited Blade Works. And one of the in the the along the ride of the episodes, you realize that Okay, well, I'll give you guys some of the background. High-level, there are war games that happen between various factions, and each participant in the war game gets a heroic spirit. The heroic spirit is a hero of legend.

A hero of legend, a spirit of legend comes down and gets materialized, and they fight as your avatar for you. But what you realize is there's a twist to this. The hero from legend doesn't have to be from the past. Because this cosmic power taps in to time and space itself, the hero can be from the future, too. So, what that means for the main character, Shir- Shiro, is that it turns out he's a participant or indirectly a participant, but he's also a heroic spirit. He meets himself. He meets the her hero version of himself from the future.

Now, why is this so interesting from the perspective of time travel? Because this is technically allowed. In the form of time travel that we're talking about, you are actually allowed to meet yourself. It doesn't cause time to explode or anything like that. It just means that when you get older, you have to go meet yourself again. So, what this would mean from Shiro's perspective is when he meets his older future self, then when he grows up and becomes that spirit, he's going to go and meet his past self.

And what makes it so good in this show is that then they fight. Can you imagine fighting your future self? It would It would be futile because you already should know the outcome. That's the one loophole in the show is that the future version of himself loses his memory. So, the future version of himself doesn't exactly know the younger version, but the future version of himself wants to do the Captain Picard. The future version of himself is upset at the type of man that he's become.

Because what happens is he has to be a giant hypocrite. If he wants to be the hero that he wants to become, he has to kill a bunch of people in the process. And in that process of becoming that hero, the hero version of himself questions whether or not that was even worth it. Was it worth it for me to do that and become the person that I thought I wanted to be when I was younger? But we just learned the lesson, didn't we? We learned the lesson that you can't you can't change your past. So, we're going to play this clip here.

Cuz it's all about time travel and facing yourself. I don't think this is the right one. That's not the right one. Hold on. We'll come back to that one. Got the other one first. Oh, wait.

Is that the right one? You know what? I don't have these well labeled, so we're going to just see. Um I think this one, maybe. >> Hey. You know that's hell you're walking into. >> [crying] >> What was the point of you No, of me surviving that hell? Why were we spared? >> So, I like this because he looks back at his own past and he realizes he's looking back when he got saved from a catastrophic event by this guy.

And then suddenly his own version of his older self is now looking back at him and saying, "Hey, are you sure that's what you wanted to find?" >> Hey. You know that's hell you're walking into. >> [music] >> This is the one thing you'd forgotten. At first, it was just admiration. But it was admiration built on a dream. The dream that this hell could be undone. The unfulfilled dream of a man who wasn't capable of helping anyone, no matter how hard he tried.

And it cost him everything. >> [music] [music] >> So, that's a little uh shout out to this where he realizes there's something he missed, right? Is that if your older version of yourself doesn't remember your past, then perhaps there's something that you missed in terms of what your motivation was. And he realizes in this journey that he has basically taken somebody else's ideal of changing the world and he's adopted as his own. And his future self is telling him, "That makes you a hypocrite. You took somebody else's ideal and you made it your own." Well, that's exactly what we're doing, too.

That's exactly what we've been doing for 3 years. We have been taking the concept of free energy, all the technology and scientific papers that all these engineers, the people that have did the real work, what they did and what they wanted out and how they wanted to disclose this and we've watched all their videos, we've researched their opinions, their science, everything. And we've picked up their idea ideology and we've made it our own. And we're going to reveal it. Does that make us hypocrites? I don't know and I don't care. >> Is that the life you want?

The hollow life of a machine? Yeah, I do. Even if it's a life dripping with hypocrisy. I'll try to be the hero of justice the world needs. >> [music] >> Let's go, baby. That's exactly it. Now, what does he tell him at the end? >> No way I'm going to lose to myself. >> Okay, last clip on this This show is so good, dude.

If you guys haven't watched this show, you have to watch this immediately. >> [snorts] >> I mean, you know, there's some of the animes that are a little too over top, but if you like time travel, then this is it right here. This >> He's already dead on his feet. This is it. >> Because why? Because you can never beat a future version of yourself. How the hell are you going to beat a future version of yourself? Future version of yourself knows all about you, has way more experience, more skill.

There's only one way you can beat the future version of yourself. Only one way. You never ever ever give up. That's the only way you can beat the future version of yourself. Do you want to know why? Because the only way the future version of yourself can even exist is if you win.

Because if you lose and you die, your future version of yourself doesn't exist. So, if you ever fight the future version of yourself, you should go in knowing that you are going to win no matter what. You are going to win no matter what, even if it looks like there is no chance whatsoever that you can win. Think about it. Just physics. Pretty cool, huh? What does he realize? >> How can I be so foolish?

How many times do I have to see it end like this? He'll never give up. He'll never reach his limit. In fact, he's long since surpassed it. He's completely obsessed with taking down his opponent. But it's not me that he's trying to kill anymore.

I know it. I know that ragged look of his. It's all too familiar. I recognize [music] the man as well. One whose spirit has never been broken. Who's never been beaten and never succumbed.

Though the weight of it threatened to crush him, he never lost his dream of saving everyone and insisted on carrying the burden alone. I know this man. >> And you start to realize this is the moment where the timelines are converging. This is the moment where he's starting to realize he can't win. The guy that thinks there's no chance he can lose, I'm the experienced one. He realizes he actually has no chance of actually winning. And this is the moment where he's starting to remember, "Oh I'm realizing this is the whole reason why I even went down this path."

And what the future version of himself should have really been thinking. Where he really messed up is that the only reason why he even becomes the person he is is because he fought his future self. The ultimate irony is the future version of himself was trying to shut himself down, and in the course of fighting his future self, he gave his future self the exact tools he needed to become him. That's why I love this show so much is you're watching it, and the show doesn't even really address it. The show just lets you figure that out while the fight's going on.

They don't even have a big conversation about, "Hey, you're my future self, and you need me to do it." Nope, they're just like, "No, I'm just going to beat you." And you're watching it play out, and you're going, "Holy this guy's learning from his future self in the middle of the fight." >> If only there was a way. If only he could save everyone who suffered. >> This is Unlimited Blade Works.

There you go. >> He thought he might find a purpose for his miserable existence. >> Okay, I'm going to skip ahead a little bit of this, though. >> In any event, the battle of Shirou Emiya is about to end. >> Yeah. I get it. You're right. My wish really is fake. But there's something beautiful about it. Putting others before myself is hypocritical.

I understand that. Still, I couldn't help but admire the idea. I thought how great it would be if I could live like that. Even if my life was a sham, there was still beauty in that wish. In doing whatever I could to make others happy. I won't let that go.

Even if it is foolish, I won't [music] give it up. I don't care what you say. I don't care if I'm a fraud or a hypocrite. Because I KNOW MY DREAM'S NOT A MISTAKE. >> UH-OH, CHAT. When the music drops like that and you're the villain and the sky just opens up, you know that shit's over, boss. You know that is over, boss.

Okay. Uh well, you know, we'll play this out. Well, I'm just going to copyright strike anyway. Let's just go for it. >> Go to hell. It's not. It's not.

My dream is NOT A MISTAKE. >> MY favorite part right there. It's where even after all that even after all that, he realized he could just kill him anytime. Future version of himself could have killed him anytime, even right then and there. And in that moment he realized that he had lost and he had always lost and he had never had a chance to win. And of course concedes to his future self. I'll leave the last uh for you guys to watch on your own.

Okay, guys. That's our show for tonight. I'm going to do the super chats. Thank you very much for watching. I hope you guys enjoyed it and I hope this opens your mind up a little bit to the idea of time travel and what it could mean. Because at the end of the day, if we want to reveal this, we have to understand it.

We understand how it works. We can't just be idiots out there going, "Oh, I'm just going to translocate myself from beam myself up from one location to the next. We have to understand how it practically works. So that when we see the science and the technology on display, we go, "Oh, there it is." Just like I did with that Brookhaven paper. That's exactly what I want to empower us to be able to do is say, "Oh, wow.

Look, there's the Department of Energy proving us right, negative entropy right there in experimental results." Also, I hope you guys have a good happy Halloween. Everybody in the pilled chat, thank you very much all my pilled followers. Ooh, Woken Walked gifted the phone. Hey, how's it going? For Patrick, for Jean-Luc Picard, for Star Trek, for our shared future.

Woken Walked, thank you so much. Sure, appreciate you very much. Rumble chat, everybody hanging on the Rumble chat. I see you Dutch Rumbler. I see you SMASH Boss, KC Era, Wild Lurker, all my normal followers out there. Appreciate you guys.

Bad Thank you very much for following. Thank Thank you for watching. And then our supers, happy Halloween everybody, by the way. Let me get my pumpkin. >> [clears throat] >> Yes, chat. It's a very beautiful pumpkin. When supported my local farmers market.

Gave him a nice little tip. Beautiful pumpkin. Look at this, doesn't even look real. Wonderful. Okay. Be humble.

For you are made of dirt. Be noble, for you are made of stars. See, we need more poetry on this live stream. That's what we need. Thank you very much, Jeffrey Swansong. Appreciate you.

Appreciate that super chat. Dino Complazier I just love two cents Ash and keep on kicking ass. Appreciate you, Dino Complazier. You've been a long time follower. Long time supporter. Says, "Yeah, Ash, brother."

A Dory's Q from Star Trek. But looks like Q from James Bond. You're the man. Thank you very much. I appreciate it. The Q episodes are always the best because they're psychological.

Because it's not just oh, we're just shooting pew pew somebody. Is it we have to beat a psychological battle against a foe that has much more power and capability than us. Steven Fleischer says we can reverse time, but we can't tap. Like come on everybody. Hit that like button. Guys, if you are not hitting the like button, what are you even doing?

Chat. Look at it this way. You have two choices. You can either learn physics from me. That's one choice. Or your other choice is you can learn physics from this guy.

Here it is. I got a lot of clips for tonight. Oops. >> They'll see my car haulers and they'll wonder if that one is pregnant, right? And [laughter] what happens they go to to to fast food store you wait in slow lines to go to a fast food store to have food handed to you through a window. No time is a human being seen. They would surely write back to a phone home and say life forms on Earth are these metallic objects that roll on wheels.

And And got to believe >> This lady This lady has to think that she's talking to a complete right here. Right? If somebody comes on and they're like hey, what what do you think about the aliens? Oh, the aliens are going to come here and they're going to think that that the cars are creatures and they're going to be like why isn't this car talking to me? I I honestly can't be I'm trying to just I can't say anything nice about this. And I actually think that Neil deGrasse Tyson might just be a legit though.

I think the biggest trick that Neil deGrasse ever pulled and GT ever pulled was convincing people he's an actual physicist. I'm pretty sure Neil deGrasse Tyson is just a bumbling that has somehow convinced everybody that he's some sort of insightful genius. >> You mean this is an animal that has got big teeth that stick out and a big rubbery nose and and legs the size of tree trunks. And it's like, huh? >> You think they're going to be confused by an elephant? You think they're going to be confused by an elephant and cars?

Super advanced aliens that can teleport or use warp drives to get to us and you think they're going to be struggling to understand elephants? >> [laughter] >> Need to have that level of sensitivity. And I worry they land >> Wow. So chat, you know what? I'll give you a choice. You can either learn physics from me or you can learn physics from this guy. Also selling his book.

I'm apparently still the only person not selling a book at this point. Let's go back to those supers. I got one more Picard thing queued up for us. Oh, where is it? Where were we at here? Gray Scout Epsilon says it's nice when you're not lying about Candace and earning those Ziyal bucks.

Stay in your lane, Ashton. Lying about Candace? Please, bro. Tell me one lie I've said about Candace Owens. >> [laughter] >> I've said nothing about the truth about her, man. Isn't she crashing out about Lea files? I almost I wanted to get involved in that, by the way.

I should have done it because I knew Candace was going to cancel on Lea files cuz Lea files will expose her. I wanted to jump in there and do the jelly thing. That was the moment. Lea files and Candace were fighting and I should have said You going to really let her talk to you like this? You You know, if we had really stuck it, I think we might have been able to make the debate happen. So that's on me, guys.

The fact that Candace canceled on Lea files if I had just stuck it. But Candace actually just bores me now cuz I think honestly if you haven't figured out that she is just completely deceitful and dishonest, it's on you at this point. It really is. Like, she's actually just a mean girl. She's just a mean girl. The truth doesn't matter to her.

What matters to her is winning, right? And that's how mean girls operate. They just distort the truth to kind of persuade you to be on their side. I don't I don't do those games, man. Doesn't doesn't work on me. I'm completely immune to it.

Like that Josie girl tried to do it to me. And I still remember when she said, what were the exact words? She said, uh you hate me because I'm a woman that's disgusted by you. Like that's how they operate. Like, they just go to some sort of weird personal attacks where they make you out to be some sort of misogynist or racist or something, you know? It's not even worth playing those games.

Anyway, Dino completes your war poles. Hell yeah, war poles. Is that a sexual thing? I don't know. Bart T. Welding, thank you very much, sir.

Don't let them promote you. Don't let them transfer you. Don't let them do anything that takes you off the bridge of that ship because what you got there, you can make a difference. Keep going, Ash. Yeah, and keep in mind, guys, this is a long time coming. We may have a pretty big break here coming soon, but this is a long road that we have to go down.

This is not the kind of road that you're going to get the answer to all this in just a year, not even 2 years. I mean, we're looking at a decade-long road here, maybe longer. And then, Cognition Design says, keep do work, Ashton. We will, guys. Okay. We have a moment of zen.

Happy Friday. Happy Halloween. And shout out to the goat, Patrick Stewart, guys. The end of Star Trek: The Next Generation, the final episode, the ending, the final scene. I think we can all feel this one. >> You know, I was thinking about what the captain told us all about the future. About how we all changed and drifted apart.

Why would he want to tell us what's to come? >> Sure goes against everything we've always heard about not polluting the timeline, doesn't it? I believe >> Why? Why did he Why did the captain go back and tell them about how they had drifted apart? Cuz he wanted to teach them the exact lesson that he learned. He wanted to teach them the lesson that you are your past. Don't turn away from it. Be the exact person that you want to be.

Be the bold bold assertive person and convicted person of your beliefs and your faith. >> However, this situation is unique. Since the anomaly did not occur, there have already been changes in the way this timeline is unfolding. The future we experience will undoubtedly be different from the one the captain encountered. Maybe that's why he told us. Knowing what happened in that future allows us to change things now. So that some things never happen.

Agreed. Come in. >> That's exactly it, right? Knowing what we know now will ensure that those things that he saw will never happen. And here's the moment. >> Am I too late? >> Of course not. Pull up a chair. >> Oh, that wasn't it yet. Okay, here it comes. >> What's the game? >> Five card draw, deuces wild.

Come in. >> By the way, the subtext here is that Picard never plays poker with them in any of the scenes. They always have a whole bunch of scenes where all the crew is playing poker and the cap- captain's never with them. >> Is there a problem, sir? >> No. I uh I just thought that I might um I might join you this evening. Uh if there's room. >> Of course. Have a seat. What's your card deal, sir? >> Oh, thank you, Mr. Data. Actually, I uh I used to be quite a card player in my youth, you know.

I should have done this a long time ago. >> You are always welcome. >> So, five-card stud, nothing wild, and the sky's the limit. >> [music] >> Sky's the limit, chat. Have a great night. >> Out in the fields [music] where the skies are wide, talking about a journey through the cosmic ride. Einstein and [music] Thorne, they set the stage for trip through time across the space age. Wormholes connect distant [music] points in space. Reversible path to a far-off place. No black holes pull, no crushing weight, just a cosmic tunnel to a distant gate. >> Talking wormholes, stargates, [music] negative energy.

Travel through the cosmos, it's our destiny. MH370, [music] where did it go? Boeing 777 through a wormhole flow. We're talking wormholes, stargates, [music] negative energy. Travel through the cosmos, it's our destiny. MH370, where did [music] it go?

Boeing 777 through a wormhole flow. MH >> [music] >> Exotic matter, [music] negative energy is the key to stabilize a wormhole for you and me. Quantum vacuum squeezed so tight, creating conditions for this wondrous flight. Static fields and lasers in the lab [music] they play, generating forces in a new kind of way. Gravitational squeezing, Casimir force, [music] negative zones we need to stay the course. >> Talking wormholes, stargates, negative [music] energy. Travel through the cosmos, it's our destiny.

MH370, where [music] did it go? Boeing 777 through a wormhole flow. Tensile formalism [music] plays so fine. Spherical geometry we realize. Energy [music] conditions that we must define. For a stable wormhole, let's give it a try. >> [music] [music] >> Gluon forces balancing the plate, creating the throat, opening the gate.

From Earth to the stars in a single bound, a shortcut through space profound. >> [music] >> Engineers and dreamers hold the key to future worlds and what we could be. With science in hand, we forge ahead through the cosmic paths that we now tread. >> Talking wormholes, [music] stargates, negative energy. Travel through the cosmos, it's our destiny. MH370, where did it go? Boeing 777 [music] through a wormhole flow. From the fields to the stars, we break the chains.

Understanding the universe, we make [music] the gains. Lil Uzi Vert shines, bringing truth to light. Through his music, [music] we'll explore the night. With wormholes and stargates, our path is clear. Exploring the cosmos, our future's here.