We Do Not Need New Physics, It Already Exists

Eric Weinstein, Weinstein. Eric Weinstein chat. Eric Weinstein on the All-in podcast with Dr. Friedberg. Do we care about this? Let's go straight to this. >> Is that what UAPs, unidentified aerial phenomena, are? Because you've recently made comments that you were a deep skeptic on UAPs, but now you you have a view that maybe there's something there there. >> No, there's definitely something there there. >> Yeah. >> That something there there, by the way, maybe China.

It may be us. It may be a fake story, but there's definitely something there. >> Based on the videos and the first-person accounts >> It's not the videos. I I've never cared about the videos. I've talked to too many smart, sober people, too many similar stories. >> I agree with him here. UFO videos mean absolutely nothing. They don't even mean anything.

All those videos they released mean nothing. Look at the MH370 videos, then look at the videos they released, and realize they've released nothing. They've released nothing. In fact, the better evidence is all the people that are screaming that there's a secret UFO program. And then we've got secret anti-gravity and the DIRDs, the Defense Intelligence Reference Documents. The ones that Bob Bigelow didn't think Trump should know about.

Weird. >> There are definitely special access programs that are all about this. The only thing that we learn from that works for to keep secrets is compartmentalization. And so we are so compartmentalized that almost no one can piece the story together. May be that the so-called stovepiping is such that we can't figure out what we know because we can't talk to each other. If you want to know what's possible, I could freak you out and it would be super cool and super frightening, but the one thing is is that I'm worried about multi-temporal adversaries. >> Time travel. >> Times travel.

Everybody says time travel because they think that time can only be one-dimensional, but imagine, for example, that you put a giant gun on >> This [ __ ] guy, chat. He's making me swear when I'm trying to get those Disney bucks, trying to get those brand deals, chat. By the way, new Paul Frederick shirt. >> [cough] [clears throat] >> He starts off so strong. All he has to say is time travel. It's all he has to say. I did a whole live stream.

It's like he watched my live stream from last week where I talked about time travel and the scary- how freaked it freaky it is. Then I just do who would do a whole live stream about this? But then he's like, "No. We can't call it time travel. We have to call it times travel." I [ __ ] hate this guy, chat. I have to be honest, I hate this guy.

I hate how he constantly comes up with this egotistical word play [ __ ] I hate how he makes up these long-ass stories when I just need like a 30-minute second explanation. It's not time travel, it's times travel because there's an extra dimension involved. It's like he's trying to make it more complicated just to be convoluted, just to be pretentious. >> a rail car. The rail car can only move in one dimension. Now somebody puts a giant gun on something like a tank and you go to the Bonneville Salt Flats. Now you can move in two dimensions.

Now you put it on an A-10 Warthog and you can move in three. Those are all spatial dimensions. Why do you think there's an arrow of time? It's because you believe time can only be one dimensional. I don't think time is one dimensional. And I if you meet an adversary who has access to multi time, it's like you're trying to compete with them with an A-10 Warthog >> I'm going to crash out, chat.

It's Friday. I'm going to the state fair with my dad tomorrow. I'm looking forward to it. I don't want to be crashing out. What the hell you talking about, man? We talking about multi time.

What does this mean, dude? You can't just make things up on the fly in the middle of a podcast and expect everybody to be catch to be following along with you. There's multi dimensions of time, so it's multi time. You mean a multiverse? Cuz there's already a thing called a multiverse. You don't need to make up something more convoluted for that.

There's all How many directions can time have, bro? It can basically just move forward or backwards or slow down. We don't need more dimensions of time. More dimensions of time are multiverses or another dimensions. Why are you making this so complicated? This is like reverse Ashton.

All I do is make things simple for the common man. All Eric does is go around and try to make things more complicated for people. >> You've got your only gun on a on a track, except with time rather than with space. If I could sneak up behind you in time knowing your intent. I mean, this is terrifying stuff to me. It's also like I would love to have this over our adversaries. But I don't want to meet anybody who knows how to do this kind of stuff.

Not on a level playing field. Let me say another one. The solar system is an escape room. And Elon is focused was focused on Mars. I said that Mars is a red herring, it's a McGuffin. Tonight he's focused on the moon.

He is our only adult so far as I can tell. Uh crazy and mad as he is. And he uses that to motivate engineers because Mars is barely doable. These are the only rocks that are potentially habitable. It's not enough diversity. If we have this much power and this these few spheres with which where we could >> Guys, what was even the question?

What is the point that we're even bringing up here? I forgot what we even talking about. Weren't we talking about time travel or something a second ago? Like what we're on to a new story now talking about Elon? And like this is the car Yes, this is the people this is the high intellectuals, man, that the podcasters platform. Because this is what it takes.

If you want to do podcasting, you just have to be able to tell stories nonstop. Don't give the person even a chance to respond. Just continually tell stories. And then they'll love you and they'll eat you up. Throw a few claims in there, wild claims. Don't ever follow up on them. Don't ever explain how any of it works. >> Put atmospheres So, assume that you could put atmospheres on the Mars and on the moon, and you could get back and forth between them with chemical rockets.

You'd have three places to screw up. We need tens of thousands, if not millions of places before I figure out how to civilize ourselves. We have to get out of here. It's too expensive to leave the solar system. So, my claim is that in an Einsteinian world, you're never going to. If Einstein is left to be in force, the speed of light is too brutal.

So, you go to Alpha Centauri, four light-years away, you come back, you do it at nearly the speed of light. Everything is 8 years advanced by the time you get back home. Nobody wants to do that, and that's just the first star. My claim is is that we have been too long in Einstein's prison. General relativity really begins in 1913, and it's really due to Grossman and Einstein, not just Einstein alone. I don't know why we say that.

Uh it's not really Einstein-Hilbert, it's really Einstein-Grossman. >> I see what's going on here. Okay, I got a beat on him finally. This guy chat. This guy cuz now he's saying, "Oh, we can get past Einstein physics. We can maybe manipulate space-time." He's just not saying it in those exact words.

The only way you get around Einstein physics is you manipulate space-time. Negative energy. The same thing that we've been talking The exact thing we've been talking about. Weinstein is setting himself up here to be the guy that gets it all right. To be the guy that Oh, I was saying this. I told you the government had anti-gravity crafts.

I called it the Observers. And I called it multi-time. And I called it what geometric unity. He's going to say, "Look, guys, I did all these podcasts and I said it was right." Bro, A, [ __ ] you. You were one of the biggest skeptics of the whole UFO thing.

You were one of the biggest skeptics until the last year when clearly somebody has spoken to you and told you that it's all real and that you should change your tune so you don't look like a [ __ ] idiot. That's what happened. That's what really happened. So, don't come out here and ever claim, "Oh, I know I think I've got it all figured out. Turns out Einstein physics was wrong. Turns out we can time travel.

Turns out we can do gravity. Turns out there are UFOs. I was right about it all." Don't even try that, dude. Don't even try it. You are, let's say, at to be generous, let's call you an early adopter.

You're not an innovator, dude. You're not an innovator. You just basically got told some inside information and you're going to be the least stupid academic. Right? The other academics are going to get black eyes like crazy. You're going to at least have been one of the first people to figure out you're going to look completely stupid if you don't change your tune. >> But more or less since 1915-1917, the equations haven't moved.

They're going to break because of what's happening in Southern Arizona. Kitt Peak has this object called DESI, the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument, and I believe that it is going to show that the cosmological constant times the metric, which is how we encode dark energy into the equation, is going to break because it's not constant. The only reason that you have lambda times the metric, which is this term, is the product rule if you take a derivative called >> See, is he seriously saying that dark energy is fake right now? I think he is, chat.

I think we're going full circle on this live stream and we're ending it where we began with dark energy being fake. I think that's where this is going. >> divergence. You have to take the derivative of lambda times the metric left alone plus lambda times the derivative of the metric. Derivative of the metric has to vanish. That term is the only possible term that can go there because of something called Lovelock's theorem if you're within general relativity and trying to do this geometrically. >> Is this about UFOs? >> is is that that's going to break.

We're going to get to five sigma if we aren't there already. I haven't kept up with the news. And then we're going to realize that the dark energy, the most important generally >> it. Makes up 60, 70, 80% of our universe. >> And we have the wrong formula for it. >> We have no contemplation of what it is. >> Well, I I I'm focused on saying I have a candidate formula and I think everybody who has one should come forward and wish all the conference and say who wins? Who's Who's got the best idea? >> I [ __ ] called it, chat. We're crashing out.

I called it. Holy [ __ ] I called it. We Dude, he literally just said zero-point energy is real. We got dark energy all wrong. We got dark energy all wrong. It's zero-point energy.

We should hold a conference with our different ideas. Zero-point energy is the answer, by the way. I've got my own candidate idea. My geometric unity yeah. Oh my god, chat. This is really how this is going to play out.

I don't know if I want to live on this Earth. CIA, just order me away, CIA. I'm ready. My body's ready. I don't care about the ScarJo clone. I don't care about the ScarJo clone anymore.

I've given up on it. Just order me away to Diego Garcia. I don't want to see this play out. Don't Don't Don't punish me. >> We can't just have Ed Witten patting himself on the back saying, "Well, the string theory is the only game in town." It's like 42 years later. It Come on.

This >> String theory? String theory? Why are we even talking about string theory? This is like the people that talk about Mick West. Why do you even give this debunker airtime? Stop quote tweeting him five times per day and he'll go away. You give him oxygen and he doesn't go away.

This is what's happening to string theory. Nobody gives a [ __ ] about string theory. Literally no one ever talks about it. No one cares about it. It's not solving anything in physics. You can just ignore it.

You can just not talk about it and not talk about the people that are doing it. It doesn't change anything about our reality. Stop giving it airtime. Stop giving it room in your head. I never think about string theory ever. >> This is preposterous. Getting back to policy, give me some money and get rid of these people.

I don't want them reviewing anything that I'm doing. Get me somebody competent to talk to. So, sorry. Let me just go back to the dark >> Chat, Eric Weinstein wants Eric Weinstein wants someone competent to talk to. Like Avi Loeb. Give him a Avi Loeb to talk to.

They'll figure out the UFO thing, chat. They'll figure it out. >> The energy measurement, which we're going to end up having a very high accurate estimation, >> Right. >> tells us that the general theory of relativity and the equations associated with it are wrong because of the relationship that we see between matter and rotation and movement. And so, there's something off about that and that >> We know that general relativity is not the last. We know general relativity is wrong. >> It is a view. It is a derivative >> map and not the territory. It is a great, great model. Whoever >> Yeah, whatever.

I heard enough. He's not even wrong is the thing. It's just I can't deal with the pretentiousness and I can't deal with the fact that the difference between me and Eric Weinstein is that Eric Weinstein is more like Jason Verbelli. He needs his own explanation. He needs to figure it out all on his own. He can't use the ideas that are already out there.

Hal Puthoff zero point energy. We know he knows about that. He sat in a room with Hal Puthoff. He doesn't think that Hal Puthoff's ideas work? Every single question in physics has an answer from zero point energy. In a peer-reviewed paper by various engineers and physicists.

Some that work for Lockheed Martin, some that are PhDs. Like, I didn't try to reinvent all of physics. I didn't have to. Cuz once I found out it's covered up, all I had to do is find the people that already figured it out. Hell, it only took me like 6 months. We've known about zero-point energy for years.

We don't need to invent some new physics. We just need people to pay attention to physics that's already been written that already resolves all these problems.