There Is a Command Structure Inside the Orbs

I have been proposing and saying on early all the podcast including Alex Jones this week that these orbs flying around are fusion reactors and they are. And the question has been are they doing fusion or are they doing zero point energy? Are they pulling energy out of the vacuum? Are they a structure that is a coherent structure with nothing inside? Is there a command apparatus inside? What's going on?

And I'm here to say they're all of it. That there is a command structure apparatus inside. You can't make this work without something inside. Can't be fully just here's a bubble and now you can move it and all this stuff without it eventually falling apart. The big part of these things is that there's energy coming out of these things and they have to be getting producing energy from somewhere. Was doing some re-reviews of some older papers and the papers that I've talked about a lot but if you haven't been paying attention to my content a lot you may not be familiar.

In 20 2006 aerospace researchers Paul Sizz and David Froning produced proposed a reusable military aerospace plane designed to take off from a runway. Accelerate through the atmosphere with advanced air breathing propulsion used by NATO blah blah blah. So, use magnet magneto hydrodynamics to harvest electrical propulsion from the air flow. So, I've been digging more into this and I'm ready to break this down and explain to you that this is what these orbs are no question whatsoever. This has to be what the orbs are. So, without the paper let me just break it down to you.

Number one. They suck air in. They ionize that air with a laser beam, possibly just an electrical charge. They pre-ionize this air and they use this plasma as a working fluid. They can extract electrical energy out of it because if they charge it, so they charge it and you can use that charged matter to produce electricity. Now, when you do that, you pull energy out of it, so you actually slow the air down.

So, in in in essence, you're converting kinetic energy into electricity. You still with me? So, now we've got air breathing. Now, every single person who watches me knows what air breathing is. I just explained it to you. Air breathing, the concept of using the air.

Now, magnetohydrodynamics is that we're going to apply that current to it. We're going to apply that charge to it. We're going to turn it into a plasma, and now we're going to have this separation of charge, and we're going to use that separation of charge to drive current and produce electricity. That's magnetohydrodynamics. So, air breathing, magnetohydrodynamics, using electromagnetism to pull electricity straight out of the air by ionizing it. Cool.

Step number one. That itself is not over unity. That's not free energy. That's just still normal classical physics. That's part one of this paper. Part two of this paper.

At the center of the vehicle sat the component that separated the most from conventional aerospace plane designs. Notice it says at the center of the vehicle. That is a nod to Robert Bussard and inertial electrostatic confined fusion. In tokamaks, the fusion reactor is not at the center. In fact, there's nothing at the center. It's a ring.

It's a donut. A DPF Oh, yeah. A dense plasma focus fusion system. A DPF is a compact pulsed plasma device built around concentric electrodes, two rings, one bigger one ring smaller than the the other. A capacitor bank discharges across the electrodes, ionizing the inject fuel and creating a plasma sheath. Large electrical currents and their associated magnetic fields accelerate that sheath along the electrode assembly during a phase known as rundown.

At the end of the device, the current sheath carrying plasma sheath rapidly collapses towards the axis forming an intense short-lived focus with extremely high particle energies and densities. Hm. This is really making me wonder about the heat signal signature inside the plasma orbs. So, they uh are producing fusion and the idea is they take this charged charge this charged plasma and they have it con- focus down and collapse. Collapse inwardly and this causes fusion to occur. And they do this in pulses.

They say they can potentially do this 10 to 100 times per second. Now, why do I say this? Because in theory, if you were doing this 100 times a second, this could support a steady state system. That's fast enough, but not entirely sure this is necessarily the exact mechanism they're using. The next part was the interesting part. They selected proton boron 11 fusion.

This is the hardest one to do. That's because it produces alpha particles with no neutrons. Now, you can use those alpha particles directly, also, for electricity because it's releasing charged particles. Because the primary reaction doesn't generate intense neutron flux, uh it's uh it it's really useful where shielding matters. Remember, all that shielding is extra weight. So, you're trying to reduce the weight as much as possible.

Now, um it mentions Bremsstrahlung radiations here. It says Bremsstrahlung x-rays are the major energy loss mechanism. And the And both the or original study and the subsequent work have treated those losses as the core central problem. I don't know enough about how this integrates into the actual design of the machine, but my guess would be that the magnetic mirror and the magnet magnet uh eliminates most of these losses, and the losses that they are getting are all focused out of the beam that we see coming out of the orbs. Like, these systems are hyper-efficient. So, part two.

Part one, MHD air breathing is producing electricity. Part two, they use that electricity to ignite a fusion reaction. They can use that electricity to power a device that ignites a fusion reaction. That's part two. And why are we doing this? You say, "Ashton, well, you already have something that can produce electricity.

Because I want a [ __ ] lot of electricity. I'm trying to make a mega gauss generator, chat. I'm not trying to produce a light to power my streaming room. I'm trying to power a Jarvis orb that's going to teleport a plane away. So, I'm producing electricity from the air because that's the primary source, then I'm powering a fusion reactor. Why?

Because it's going to produce a particle beam. Because the fusion reaction releases alpha particles and it's going to produce a beam of x-rays. And then what? There's a third piece that we just didn't think about before until right now. We're going to turn this thing into a zero-point energy generator. And it wasn't me that came up with this.

It was right here the whole time. Okay. So, anyway, here's the thing about how much energy it's going to generate. Depending on what the Q factor is for the fusion reactor, if the Q factor is just three, which is pretty low, then or sorry, if it gets up to six, then this thing's going to be producing gigawatts. And now we're we can produce whole we can power entire cities. I mean, this is just standard fusion still.

Still, this is just normal normal fusion, normal engineering. And the reason why I came back to this is because I wanted to see did they talk about using this to power to get power zero-point energy or something like that? Cuz I'm like looking at these orbs and I'm going there has to be these guys. Like this this is it. Yes. They specifically talked about it.

I asked AI, I'm like, wait, what? The AI says they talked about it. So, I clicked the link. I want to point this out. I think Tom Hudson will appreciate it. The authors considered propellantless field propulsion.

What? What? Chat, we've learned too much. Before you see it and they use these words, you're like propellantless field propulsion. That's zero-point energy propulsion. Holy [ __ ] chat.

Let's go. This is what Charles Bueller and Andrew is Andrew, I think, right? What they were talking about and Danny Jones? One of the One option retained in the 2025 vehicles air-breathing and fusion engines while adding field propulsion as an augmentation. O M G No way. An approach they compared conceptually to the B-36 bomber's addition of jet engines to supplement its piston-driven propellers.

A more radical alternative would replace the the conventional propulsion almost entirely. The proposed mechanisms include ideas associated with James Woodward's Mach effect research, in which rapidly varying internal energy was hypothesized to create transient mass fluctuations that might be exploited for propulsion. Rapidly varying internal energy. Are you noticing that everybody's saying the same thing? Just use Salvatore Pais as your guide, chat. Use him as your spirit guide.

The Pais effect. Rapid acceleration transients of electrically charged matter. And what does this say right here? The Woodward effect whatever, rapidly varying internal energy may cause mass fluctuation transients, as well as other electromagnetic field configurations proposed to alter the effective interaction of gravity and inertia. We know this just means interacting with zero-point energy. That's what that means.

Okay. The power requirement drove the 2050 study even further into speculative territory. These orbs have to be doing zero-point They have to be pulling zero-point energy out. They And this is where they might not need the fusion reactor anymore. That's what it says above. It says, "If you're doing this, this might be able to replace the other mechanisms." I'm pretty sure it's not replacing the air-breathing part.

It might be replacing the fusion part, but my guess is they're doing all three. My guess is they're doing all three. Figure eight shows MHD infusion power supplemented by the proposed extraction of energy from the zero-point fluctuations of the quantum vacuum. Uh uh Douglas Miller, paging Douglas Miller, are you seeing this? Catalyzed fusion, zero-point energy fusion. That's pretty cool.

Um with nanostructured materials offsetting the mass of the additional equipment. What does this mean? You guys know what this means? This basically means if you use aerogels or other lightweight carbon materials, you want your thing to be as light as possible. There is a command structure inside those orbs. There's a command structure inside those orbs and they're using advanced materials make it as light as possible because of the fusion reactor and they need the mass that object to be light.

As light as possible. Quantum vacuum phenomenon themselves are real features of modern physics. But extracting continuous useful net energy from vacuum is a very different proposition. I'm not even sure this is really the original first paper, but I am pretty sure this is from the original paper. I mean, it's pretty clear cuz it says right there on the top augmentation of vehicle jet power and propulsion by field power and propulsion. Figure eight.

Let's go, baby. Okay. We bring the receipts every single time. Let's go up a little bit though here. Before we get to figure eight. Cuz here's their aneutronic thing.

And spoiler alert, it doesn't look like that. Spoiler alert, it looks like a magical Jarvis orb. So, erase Basically, use AI in your mind to erase this plane thing that you see right here and imagine a Jarvis orb with a beam shooting out of it instead, okay? Then you'll be kind of back on the the same page here. Cuz what you see here is this is all it needs to be on the inside. Like literally, this is all it needs to be.

That's it. Just a tube. It's basically just a tube when you actually boil it right down. Everything else, all that other stuff is just like adding like uh you know, dope ass like what is the the wing of the wings of the back of your car or whatever. I forget what thing's called. I haven't played Need for Speed in long enough time.

Spoiler. Anyway, you get the point. Read this part. Onboard air breathing MHD propulsion system powers eliminated expensive ground operation providing tens of megawatts of electric power for in-flight ignition of the vehicle's fusion reactor. When I say things, it's because I read them and they're true, Chad. Not making them up.

So when I say they're using the MHD propulsion to power a fusion reactor, that's not me making it up. Says it literally right there. That's the words. Sometimes you have to help with the debunkers cuz they're a little slow. They're not good at the reading the words. This system by Professor Paul says of St. Louis University is very similar to ours.

Black project engineer right there. Mhm. Fusion reactor, says right there, ignited by MHD system, provided thrust from Mach 10 to orbital speeds by electron beam heating of ingested airflow and hydrogen propellant within the vehicle. Very interesting right here. Because we're talking maybe there's a beam. Maybe this beam they're shooting out in front that we're seeing.

Maybe there's more going on with that beam. In fact, I'm going to speculate right now that that beam is a conditioned electromagnetic beam we're seeing. We said out of those beams shooting out is x-rays, maybe. But what if it's also been polarized in such a way by which it's actually interacting with the zero-point energy. It's actually creating a path where the orb is just falling into it. The next page shows the field and jet propelled vehicle next configured by Flight Unlimited.

That's David Froning's company. For the US Air Air Force for a later 2050 time period. It retained the 2025 vehicle air breathing and rocket jet propulsion systems and MHD fusion power systems. But the vehicle also embodied a field propulsion module to significantly extend Air Force capability to support US civilian space operations on the moon. They would have thought this was insane 20 years ago. But now we're talking about building a moon base. They're building a train on the moon.

It's true, Chad. Don't try to fact check me. It's true. They're building a train on the moon. The Redditors are going to go harvest helium 3 on the moon. The moon is where it's at.

And they were already preparing with their Jarvis orbs for the moon. They for the record, they definitely made him use this generic ass image. They definitely Paul says he's a smart guy that worked with on government stuff. They definitely had to use some generic thing that didn't look anything like a plasma orb. Like you don't think he'd understand plasma and fusion technology that were integrated into their spacecraft. Definitely understands plasma fusion.

Definitely knows it's not going to look anything like this if you're looking at it flying around. Nothing like this. They basically just draw lines to it. It's like, yes, this is the thing right here. Antenna for very intense field energy emission. Super strong superconducting carbon 60 nano nano tube materials for lightweight airframe propulsion and power.

There you go. This is the one that I really like though. Look at this bad boy. Polarization modulation of electromagnetic radiation. Two years ago I wouldn't have any clue what the hell this means. And now I look at it and I go he's saying this is how you make a gravity beam.

This is how you turn a normal electromagnetic beam into a gravity beam. When they say couples strongly with the vacuum, they're saying the electromagnetic beam is like a key and if they turn it just right, it locks in and now it becomes a gravity beam. That's what they're saying.