Elections have CONSEQUENCES

Why some say the moon? Why choose this as our goal? And they may well ask, why climb the highest mountain? Why 35 years ago fly the Atlantic? Why does Rice play Texas? We choose to go to the moon.

We choose to go to the moon We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard. Because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills.

Because that challenge is one that we're willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one we intend to win, and the others, too. >> Ashton Forbes, you know, that the super jacked guy. >> Malaysian 370 contact watch you mean 120 0.9er tonight. >> Breaking news tonight, a Malaysia Airlines flight [music] with 239 people on board, including four Americans, has [music] gone missing. >> Even as these grainy satellite images released today by the Chinese government >> Again, the the Malaysia flight, too,

was that [music] was one shot at China saying knock it off. >> Why shoot it down if it's not hostile? >> Our technologies [music] permit us to manipulate time and space. >> What Americans would? >> [music] >> Did they distance annihilate? >> This country's very powerful. Far more powerful than people understand. We have weaponry that nobody has any idea what it is, and it is the [music] most powerful weapons in the world. Not even close. >> I remember the line from the Hindu [music] scriptures, the Bhagavad Gita. Vishnu is trying to persuade the prince that he should do his [music] duty.

And to impress him takes on multi-armed form [music] and says Now I am become death >> [music] >> the destroyer of worlds. I suppose we don't know about that. On my honor. >> [music] >> Chat. It is a dark day, chat. Welcome to the greatest live stream on Earth. Guys, yesterday was election day and the results are in.

Democrats have swept the Senate and the House. I don't know if they have a super majority. I'm not very good at math. But they won a lot, chat. They won and a lot of people are going to jail. A lot of you all, I mean.

Not me, chat. I have always been an ally of the trans people. It is very well known. As you may you can actually ask Grok. You'll see that I have repeatedly supported trans people. They by far make the best coffee.

Undeniable. >> [snorts] >> It's where I go to get my coffee all the time. And and I am already on the woke 2.0 train. Chat. Yes. Pronouns are now mandatory. Pronouns in your bio and that are now mandatory.

It was optional. Now it's mandatory. What does this mean for disclosure? That's what everybody is wondering. They all want to know, but what about the aliens, Ashton? Are they going to get transed, too?

Is that even a question? Is that a question that you even have to ask? The question you should be asking is, when does the alien religion begin? When do we have to denounce the old ways, the old beliefs, and fall in rank under the new alien overlords? It's coming, chat. Now, before [snorts] we get to some of this, I want to be serious for a minute.

I am currently feuding with the community known as the Groypers. Now, one thing the community this community should know is that they tried to feud with me like a year ago and got completely annihilated. So, just fair warning, this isn't your average feud. This isn't your average bear you're dealing with here, chat. Okay? So, I'm hearing people trying to take credit for this.

I don't know why. >> [snorts] >> If you want to take credit for being on the woke side, that's totally your prerogative. But, if we're getting serious here, a lot of people are talking a lot of [ __ ] A lot of people are out there trying to say that they were right about everything. And I'm going to go ahead and humble them. Go ahead and just give them a quick reality check. Specifically, I'm talking about Nick Fuentes.

Now, first thing you need to know about Nick Fuentes is that he was exposed last week. >> [clears throat] >> If you're not paying attention, what is the big the dirt on Nick Fuentes? It turns out, make sure you're sitting down for this, he is not gay. Wow. Yeah. That shocked me, too. It turns out you can't always judge a book by its cover.

He's not actually homosexual. He's actually straight. Really it's hard to believe. Now what happened was he got caught thirst trapping simping over an e-girl an Asian e-girl dressed up like Harley Quinn. This is true, all true chat. I don't ever lie.

I'll bring the receipts if necessary. Not just any emoji either. Not just like a smiley face emoji like the the drooling mouth emoji. My man has no self-control. Now why is this important? Everybody of course, it doesn't matter if he was a homosexual.

People can believe and have whatever beliefs they want. I've always been an ally. The issue here is that this is some Clayton Bigsby level [ __ ] This is like you're the racist but you didn't realize that you're black you you're the white supremacist but you didn't realize that you're black. You're the one saying that there's no mix mix race mixing but you're out here simping for Asian girls. And let me be honest. As a let's say slight build white nerdy man I totally understand Nick Fuentes. I get the Asian fever, the yellow fever.

I lived in Singapore, man. I know how it is, bro. I've seen a million Nick Fuentes's with their Asian girlfriends. Because they want to have a girl that will be sub that will be submissive to them. They will cater to them. Do everything that they want for their needs.

I get it, bro. But I'm just saying it completely exposes your whole white supremacy stick. Right? How can you be a white supremacist that wants to keep the race pure when you're out here simping for Asian chicks. Now, that being said, that [snorts] doesn't mean he's wrong necessarily on politics. He's wrong on politics cuz he's just wrong on politics.

So, here's a good example. First of all, I'm going to point out about this tweet. That this tweet here of October 2024 was right before a big election we had called the presidential election, which is much bigger than the midterm elections. And during this, Nick Fuentes, during this exact moment, Nick Fuentes was actually promoting Kamala Harris for president. Doing his anti-Trump thing. He ended up being horrifically wrong about that.

Trump ended up winning, and he's currently the president of the United States right now, even despite of the midterm elections. So, what were the issues here? Mass immigration. Okay, now I don't know what the exact numbers are, but what I'm hearing is that Trump has deported twice as many people as Obama, and Obama was the previous record holder. So, I don't know what metric we're saying. Is this like a something about H-1Bs?

Oh, we didn't like that we were doing H-1B legal immigration, so therefore we we just disagree. Here's my number one problem. Your whole point is you're supposed to be against illegal immigration, and then you got what you wanted. We got more more people being deported. So many people are being deported that liberals are making caravans, driving down the street, chasing the ICE cars, getting themselves killed by ICE. Unprecedented, something we've never seen before.

And you then come and say this doesn't meet your requirements? This doesn't meet the standard? Uh bro, he gave you exactly what you wanted. You say, "We didn't deport enough?" What? Doing more than anybody else has ever done isn't enough?

So, basically you set an impossible bar, a bar that could never possibly be reached. And then you demanded other people go do it for you. How many people have you [ __ ] deported? Zero. Zero, not even one. You're like, "Oh, if you don't deport a million people, you don't meet my expectations."

This is stud man 69 right here. Jesus Christ, this is exactly what I'm talking about by the way. Thank you for making my point for me. These people aren't serious. They got exactly what they wanted and then they demanded they didn't get anything. Okay, what's the next one on the list?

Trans kids. Are Do Does anybody in this world feel like we have moved towards more trans kids from where we were 40 years ago or even 2 years ago? I I don't even know where you're trying to make on this point. We didn't ban enough trans kids? No new wars. What war do you think we're in?

You think we're in a war with Iran right now? Well, where's the news about the war updates in Iran? Their leadership is wiped out, their government is wiped out, they have no capability to fight us, we have nobody on the ground in Iran right now whatsoever, and there's no operations being conducted. What what sense is there a war with Iran going on right now? Please, any metric. Give me any metric by which we're in a war with Iran.

It's actually crazy how much people just lie and make [ __ ] up. Just lie and make [ __ ] up. Next thing. So, completely wrong. In fact, not only did we do some new wars, we already won them all. We took out Venezuela, we bought out we bought Greenland, and we just kind of completely neutered Iran.

We can measure based on casualties if you want to compare to the Iraq war, too. Why don't we measure based on casualties? You want to do that? No, you don't, because you don't want to measure based on any actual metrics cuz you're wrong on everything. Next thing, free speech. Free speech actually has to be in a better place now than it's ever been.

In fact, this guy was banned off of all of social media until Elon unbanned him to allow him to make this post. And you're complaining that the free speech isn't good enough? Well, bro, I'll tell you what. You think free speech is you think it's bad now? Wait until the Democrats get in power. The first thing they're going to do is make sure Nick Fuentes isn't allowed any platforms anywhere ever. That's the very first thing they're going to do.

And you know who's going to defend him? Nobody. The Republicans are going to let the Democrats run roughshod on Nick Fuentes, run train on him. They're going to let him ban We're going to let him ban his bank accounts, throw him in prison if they want. We don't care. In fact, they can have him as a peace offering.

Pro-life? We literally overturned Roe v. Wade. Roe v. Wade got overturned. Oh, well, it wasn't enough though, because now you didn't you didn't mandate it at the federal level, which we can't even do.

States have their own rights. So, because we didn't mandate it at the federal level, we didn't do enough for you when it comes to abortion? Holy [ __ ] man. This is like entitled 16-year-old prom queen. And tax cuts. Okay. >> [snorts] >> Honestly, if that's where you guys are getting your news and you guys are feeling like, "Oh, we won."

Let me ask you, do you feel like you won? What is it that you feel like you won exactly? You guys are on the front lines. The people that are the Nick Fuenteses in his community, you're on the front lines, not me, not us. They're going to come after us, but not before they go for you guys. You guys are on the front lines.

You guys are the first people who are going to be getting taken out. You guys are operation black shield. We're going to sit in the back. We're going to let them take you. We're going to let them ban you, and we're going to use you as a peace offering so they don't ban us. We're going to say, "We're not the pieces of [ __ ] who are being racist all over the internet.

Go ahead, ban them. We don't even care about them." That's what's really going to happen. So, I don't know if you feel like you won, I bet it's like kind of a sinking though, right? >> [snorts] >> Okay. Now, let's talk a little bit of actual disclosure politics now that we've addressed the elephant in the room. >> [clears throat] >> That is a funny clip, by the way. Somebody in the comments said, "Dave Farina owned you." >> [laughter] >> Okay.

Sure, man. Yeah, he got me. Because I'm not I I haven't killed anybody, but I'm I'm pretty bad though. Sure, anytime he wants, man. Anytime he wants to have a conversation, debate, chat, I'll be here. Can be cordial.

But, what's really going to happen with disclosure? I think that's what you guys want to know. Well, the first thing is that the Democrats got kind of a black eye with this UFO disclosure thing. Trump came out, and we now have seven. We can count to seven. Seven UFO drops.

Now, you may say that they're not significant, and I would agree with you. But, realize it's politics. All of this is politics. And this is actually my criticism of Nick Fuentes is, if you're going to get into politics, you better get into politics. If you want to come into politics, and you say, "Hey, I want to be heard. I want to have a voice."

Well, then you better pick a side. And if you pick the other side, then don't be surprised when you get ostracized. Like, I don't know, that's how politics works. That's what politics is. It's a team sport. And if you're not on the team, then you're not on the team.

Welcome to politics. So, what's happening in UFO disclosure is that Trump came out and made the Democrats look stupid. Because he just came out and released seven files of UFO drops. They're real files. We got the bass documents. We got the thirds attached to the UFO files.

But to your point, if you're going to criticize, we didn't get real disclosure. We didn't get aliens are real. We didn't even get that fusion reactors are real. We got very little. But it's still moving the ball. It's the perception of disclosure.

It's the perception of trying to be transparent. That's what the Democrats hate. And the Democrats want to take that that win. They want to take that win from Trump. And normally, if you were to say, "Ashton, you're making this up." I would probably agree with you, but I'm not.

They literally admitted this. They admitted that this is what they want to do. One of their agendas is to take back over the disclosure topic from Trump, because he's getting credit from it. Which is crazy, but that's what they're going to do. So, how are they going to pull it off? The way I imagine it happening is that they have to release some additional documents that Trump has either been slow to release or just didn't release for whatever reason.

So, in my mind, the only thing I can think of is going to be a bunch of alien stories. Like what would be the things that they would not be releasing? The things are not going to release are going to be a bunch of abduction stories, stories of people being demonically possessed, and demons haunting them, the stuff that the Skinwalker Ranch people are talking about, because it's not credible. Just stories. But that's the kind of stuff Democrats love. That's the kind of stuff the woke disclosure people love.

It doesn't move the ball forward. And more importantly, this is what the deep state loves. And I'm I'm going to go ahead and say it. The woke disclosure people are probably on the side of the deep state. The way I see this, we're going to see how this plays out, but if it plays out like I expect, then what they're going to try to do is they're going to try to put the genie back in the bottle. Trump is out here and he's showing us videos of plasma orbs flying around in the sky.

Showing us videos of plasma orbs flying around in the sky, and it's undeniable. It's definitely a plasma orb. Now, you can interpret that in a lot of different ways. But that's unambiguously a plasma orb flying around in the sky. There's really no other way to explain what you're seeing right there. Now, some people may say, "Well, what can't it be a bird?"

Uh you can see the details in the buildings and the trees in the background. You don't think you could be see a bird in the foreground? It's It's an It's a plasma orb, chat. That's just what it is. I mean, I don't know what you There's a lot of things that people want this to be, but that's just clearly a plasma orb. >> [laughter] >> Okay? So, Trump is releasing stuff like this, and the Democrats have to try to spin this somehow.

They have to try to take advantage of this. But, you may say, "Ashton, well, what if they couldn't they just reveal free energy? Couldn't they reveal fusion?" Yeah, but nobody's going to do that. Nobody's going to do that. Nobody wants to do that.

Their side definitely doesn't want to do that. They could have revealed free energy and fusion anytime they wanted to. But instead, they're going on TV, they're talking to Sean Hannity, and they're talking about ooh, the aliens they they took they they followed my work, followed me home. Let's listen to Jay Stratton. This is, by the way, the face of woke disclosure 2.0. Is what we're calling it.

It's even better than normal woke in the sense that it doesn't get anything done. It makes sure that everything is about ghost stories and nothing tangible, nothing that can be proven. >> [clears throat] >> Hold on, here we go. >> Both at Skinwalker Ranch, I saw I saw uh absolutely uh non-human intelligent being you know life there. Um and then I in 2000 >> Uh That's how I talk about aliens, bro. When I see an alien, I go, "Yeah, bro, I was at Skinwalker Ranch. I I absolutely saw non-human uh beings there." Yeah, me too, man.

I was at the I dude, I was at the uh 7-Eleven and I totally saw non-human beings. Not You guys haven't had that happen to you? Oh, happens all the time. >> And in in nine uh at home, uh we started having activity where we were my family, my wife, my kids, uh you know, been married for 30 years. >> Oh, now now the larp includes my entire family. Oh, yeah, it wasn't I saw beings at Skinwalker Ranch and you know what, it wasn't even that. Also, my family got involved. My family started seeing aliens, too.

Can you draw an image of one of these aliens? No. Okay, got you. >> There's two kids and the work followed me home. And and my wife and kids started seeing this. >> Chat, that's that's the the woke disclosure 2.0 motto. You ready? My work followed me home. My work followed me home. My work followed me home.

I mean, oh, that's that's their mindset in a T. Have you noticed in video games how all the woke people write themselves into the stories now? Makes it unbearable. Makes it unwatchable. Makes it unplayable. I can't even play video games these days.

It's just like that with woke disclosure. They've written themselves into disclosure. >> [laughter] >> It used to be about space aliens and warp drives. And now it's like, "No. No, no, no. The demons are haunting me. The aliens are actually demons and I'm personally Mulder being haunted by them." Like, "Okay." Can we just see some freaking evidence?

I mean, we're in a There's been how many Paranormal Activity movies? Seven? Seven Paranormal Activity movies. Just set up some cameras around your house. I'll watch it. If there's ghosts and aliens interacting with your family, I'll watch that [ __ ] I love ghost hunters.

I don't care if it's not real. You're not even doing that though. You're not even doing that. How are people taking this seriously number one? Number two, how is this on Sean Hannity? Sean Hannity and I see Dan Farrah in the background.

You got a movie Hollywood movie producer in the background. I'm listening to the fakest [ __ ] I've ever heard in my life. It's like like it's written straight out of the disclosure day. This is like it's written straight out of Disclosure Day, the stupid ass alien movie. And people are just larping. >> uh both UAP and non-human intelligent life. And it was kind of a blessing in disguise because all those years that I worked this topic, everything was so classified and I'm I'm learning this paradigm-shifting information and I couldn't talk to my wife and kids about that.

And then all of a sudden, when Work Follow Me Home, I could talk about it. And instead of, you know, tearing us apart, it brought us closer together and and and became a big part of our lives. >> When's the movie coming out? When's the movie coming out? You're like, how much you want to bet? Oh, they're doing a movie about my life. It's going to be a dramatization where the aliens are attacking me.

I already saw it. It was called Signs. We don't think we need another one. Holy crap. Uh he's like, I couldn't talk about it until I discussed it with my wife. It was all classified.

Like the DERDs? Cuz that's what was classified, those DERDs. Those were defense intelligence reference. But now suddenly the aliens are are attacking my family and now I can speak about it. You know what? If this is alien disclosure, I don't even want this.

I don't even want this. It's hard to even believe that these are the people that gave us the DERDs. It's hard even wrap my brain around this. It's like finding out Santa Claus isn't real. We find the most important scientific papers of all time. A neutronic fusion propulsion, negative mass propulsion, warp drives, wormholes, quantum energy, free energy extraction, and they're written by a bunch of libtards who are telling us demon stories from Skinwalker Ranch.

I'm pretty sure that this is hell. I'm pretty sure that this is hell, that I'm being tortured right now. The devil was like, how do we get Ashton Forbes? He's unbreakable. The guy is unbreakable. Can't be shook by anything.

Oh, we found out. We found They came up with a way. Devil was like, put him in a world where warp drives and free energy are real, but everybody pretends like they're not real, and and they just gaslight him the whole time. That he's the crazy one for believing in warp drives and fusion, for believing in literal just [ __ ] science. How dare you believe in actual science? You have to believe in ghost stories.

You're the crazy one for believing in science. The credible people are the people telling ghost stories about their families being haunted. Wow. Okay. Well, that's how the elections are going, chat. But you know what?

We can't even complain. It's really our fault at the end of the day. It's our fault for letting these people just trample all over us and us giving them the power over us. If we had just empowered ourselves, if we had educated ourselves, we could have gotten ourselves out of this, even by voting. So, they're going to come in. They're going to go ahead and try to steal the narrative.

They're going to bring a bunch of ghost stories, alien stuff in. They're going to make sure nothing's ever about technology. The thing that scares me the most is that they're probably going to try to make fusion go away. Look at the huge push towards fusion that the Trump administration is doing. DJT stock hit like an all-time low. This is why I said don't do don't ever take my investment advice.

Even if I was right about investing, the CIA would just make sure that it's it failed. There's no reason or rhyme, just, you know, why is DJT in the hole? Because people hate Trump. I mean, that's really the reason. So, Mhm. Uh So, they're going to come in and they're going to try to take over disclosure.

They're going to try to rewind the clock. They may try to rewind fusion, which would be devastating. And then, they're going to come in and they're going to try to get rid of AI, too. If there's one thing that Democrats hate more than free speech, it's science. It's computers. They hate computers more than anything.

Computers are the ultimate truth-teller. The computer won't lie to you. The computer will just do computations and tell you the result. It's going to tell you 2 + 2 = 4. This is what Democrats hate the most. They want 2 + 2 to equal 5. Now, how do you do that? How do you make 2 + 2 = 5?

You write laws and you make sure that anybody that ever says 2 + 2 = 4, you have to change it so that it actually is 2 + 2 = 5. Now, you say, "Ashton, this is crazy. What does this have to do with AI?" This is the exact laws that they have already put on the books in places like Colorado. Already on the books and have already been passed. Think about that.

Think about that. The laws on the books that say that the AI's outcomes, not their processing, not their equations, the outcomes, need to be equitable to disadvantaged people, whatever the [ __ ] that means. Long story short, what it means is they're going to change what the AI tells you is true. Now, this should be the scariest [ __ ] you've ever heard in your whole life. Why? Because perception is reality.

We watched on Monday a hypnotist hypnotize people. Make them think the temperature was changing in the room. Made one guy go straight up homosexual and start hugging another man on stage. The one guy just started doing like lap dances on the stage and then the second moment doesn't even know why he's there and why he's doing it. And now take Now, look at AI. Go look at how people interact with AI.

AI tells, already I would say, 20 to 30% of people on this planet, they will believe exactly what the AI tells them, no question whatsoever. Verbatim. They think that the AI is like a divine being that is telling them and spitting them the truth. 20 to 30% already. So, when they start manipulating the outcome and output that the AI is giving us, it's going to have dire consequences on people's mental well-being, people's mental health. When you tell the AI, "Hey, I met a girl the other day."

And the AI is like, "Well, you have to be careful about using the term girl, because there can be 14 different genders and you have to make sure that you've used the right pronouns to determine what their gender is." And you go, "Well, not really because it's just the terms whether or not you have a penis or a vagina." And then the AI says, "Whoa, be careful there. I might have to report you to the relevant authorities if you continue to use verbage like that. That verbage isn't allowed by the system." That's That's your future, chat.

That's what these people want to make. That's how they want the reality to be. Just go look at Reddit right now. You can go look at Reddit right now and that's exactly what they want. They will even They will even snark at you while they're banning you and tell you how much of a fascist you are for not adhering to the exact language they want you to use. Psycho.

So, we'll see how this plays out. But, if [clears throat] I were you guys, I would start getting a little bit more serious about politics and think about what is it that you value. For me, if I were to answer that question, I would say what I value is technological progress. We know what technology the government is hiding. We're going to go over in about 5 minutes. They're hiding fusion.

They're hiding space-time manipulation. They're hiding literal free energy. And we're like, "Hey, we need to catch up to that [ __ ] they're hiding." And we're looking at that gap, and it is honestly widening. You could I could say that that technology is 50 years beyond where we're at now. And I think the truth is what they have is even getting further and further beyond.

We're not even catching up. So, that's why I value technological advancement. That's why I want us investing in fusion. Cuz even if they never admit the truth about the videos what we did to MH370, which they probably won't, at least we'll be proven right when the few when the technology checks out, when the science and the physics checks out. Let's get to the news. What's the big news?

This one has been going under the radar, and I think it deserves more attention. >> [clears throat] >> Shout-out to Machiavelli on Twitter. I like this guy's post, by the way. This guy, I think, kind of got red-pilled on we're going to say zero-point energy, but, you know, free energy and all that, and kind of saw that it's real. You can kind of tell he has a genuine interest in these topics, which is why I like following this guy and checking out his content. So, check out Machiavelli if you're interested. American Declaration of Freedom in Space.

What? I couldn't believe this was real. I couldn't believe this was real, but I'm looking at it and I'm going, "Okay." And I my second thought was, "I bet you only 1% of people that read this are going to understand the significance of this." So, let's go out Let me read it. >> [clears throat] >> Now, therefore, I, Donald J.

Trump, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim that the solar system and all of outer space beyond Earth are the province of all humans and are open to exploration, development, use, and the establishment of a permanent presence by American citizens consistent with United States law and the international obligations of the United States. Wow. Chat, did we just buy outer space? I think we own outer space now. Amen, chat. Chat, I think the United States owns outer space.

Your objections have been heard and your objections have been denied. No. No, we're going with it. United States owns outer space now. Now we rule the galaxy, or at least the solar system at a bare minimum, which is specifically called out that the solar system. Now, why, in all seriousness, did we do this? I bet you won't hear a lot of political pundits bringing this up. We did this because we have literal fusion warp drives.

So, space is the new battlefield, homies. If you haven't realized that, you need to get a reality check. We're about to have a moon base. Space Force also just announced three satellites around the moon. And that the moon is officially technically a war zone now. So, we are just going to do operations on the moon.

So, basically space has been militarized. And the United States is the sheriff. Our laws apply to outer space. So, this is bad news for the blue sky Redditors. The Pidos, as we call them affectionately, the Pidos are not going to be able to be Pidos in outer space. They thought they were going to get away from the laws when they went to the moon.

No, no, no. United States laws will still apply to you on the moon. Chris Hansen will catch you on the moon, even if you are 300,000 miles away or whatever. Far ass way. Mhm. Interesting. >> [clears throat] >> So, if you've been following my content, this shouldn't be much of a surprise. Because most people would say, "Well, this is this is years away.

This is years away. Why are we doing this? Why do we make a space force?" But now it all makes sense. We had teleportation technology in 2014. Of course we need a space force.

There's probably other weird aliens that aren't really like aliens, but like other random life out there that's super advanced. We have to at least be ready for it. Even if it's not actively coming here. So, of course we need a space force. And China now knows about fusion. They know about teleportation.

They're going to be working on their own. They probably already have it. So, now we need to start setting some laws. We need to start saying, "Hey, let's not leave it ambiguous to what laws apply in outer space. No, it's American laws apply in outer space. So, as you may have guessed, I love this move.

But, I love all of Trump's moves for the most part, and honestly, I'm going to cry when he's out. I'm going to cry number one cuz we're probably going to have President AOC. Some stupid [ __ ] like that. Little bartender's going to be our president. But, I'm also going to cry because Trump is hilarious. He's A hilarious, and B he definitely knows about the technology we have.

That's why he's doing all this stuff cuz he knows about the technology. He's making smart moves based on the technology, which includes, by the way, all those wars that the groupers were crying about. Uh no, those were smart moves. Because we have what's called a asymmetrical advantage. I know it's a big word, I'll help you out. It means we have technology where we can whoop everyone else's ass.

But, the problem is they're going to catch up. So, we got to whoop their ass now while we still have the asymmetrical advantage. That's how we kind of just flew right on into Venezuela, took their leader, and dipped out. That's how we did that. Honestly, we should have done it to more countries. So, anybody who tries to say, "Oh, the war to Iran, the war to Venezuela's whatever."

No, that was the right move, 100%. You guys will regret it when you find out that we had this technology, and that we didn't use it, and you'll be the first ones to cry about, "What? We had super powerful technology? Why didn't we take over the world? We should have been super fascists." You were the one crying about the wars we were using it in.

People are all hypocrites, chat. Nothing I hate more than a hypocrite. Okay, let's talk some physics. Let's talk some science. Chat, I figured it out. I literally figured it out.

You know what? I I thought it, and now I'm going to jinx it. And the the stream's going to crash. I was like, "We've made it this far without the stream crashing." And I probably just jinxed it. We might be cooked. >> [clears throat] >> I figured out what these orbs are, BTW.

I guess I technically could have made the live stream all about how I literally figured out what these plasma fusion orbs are. But I'd already kind of figured it out. And So now I want to lay it down, though. Look at that orb right there. That's a beautiful orb, chat. Absolutely beautiful orb.

Perfectly spherical. Well, I mean, maybe not perfectly, but spherical enough. It's definitely spherical. That is a spheromak. That is a spherical plasma orb, also known as a literal spheromak. Has to do with the geometry.

So fusion is actually defined based on the geometry. Tokamak is a donut. Uh stellarator is like a twisted donut, crinkly donut guy. And that right there is actually a dense plasma focus. Is what this is. And I'll explain you how I know that.

How do I know that? There are two different classifications of fusion reactors. Ones with external magnetic fields. External magnets. Tokamaks, stellarators, even field reverse configuration. And there are ones with internal magnetic fields.

What we're looking at here is a fusion reactor with internal magnetic fields. How do we know that? Well, because we're looking at a freaking ball of plasma. What that means is the magnetic fields are on the inside. Being produced from the inside. They're being produced from the inside, and they're creating a bubble.

So that is a dense plasma focus. That's exactly what it is. Now, look at it carefully. Why is it perfectly spherically yellow {slash} green? I want you to watch it and watch what happens. Still [snorts] perfectly yellow {slash} green, right?

Now there's two of them. Now there's three of them. And you can see right there in the screen, right in the very middle of the screen right there. It's still perfectly yellow and perfectly spherical. But now what's happened? What's what just occurred?

They just locked in. They just locked in the triangle formation. And now they're in a perfect equilateral triangle. I would bet you a billion dollars that that is a absolute 100% perfect equilateral triangle. And I mean absolute perfect. And the reason for that is those three spheres are exactly the same.

All three of them are exactly the same. They're all producing internal magnetic fields. And they've locked in from magnet inversion. Perfectly locked in. So basically the strength of the electromagnetic field will determine the distance by which they lock in, I think. That's not what I wanted to show you.

What I want to show you is this. What's happening with them? Look at that. Notice now it almost looks like they blur. When you're watching the orbs suddenly while they spin around the plane, right after they lock in, it looks like they blur a little bit. Can't really tell what it is cuz we don't really even know what's going on, but once we start to learn that these are fusion reactors, it actually does start to make sense.

And now actually, if we look carefully now, we can tell that they have created their crescent shape. Their umbrella shape. The the heat signature now is now only on one edge of the orb and it's very clear that it is. And we can even see it at a distance before we've zoomed in. Before we've zoomed in, if you look in the top right and I'll zoom it I'll zoom it in here myself, you can see that the orb is no longer spherically yellow. That the yellow is now an umbrella.

That's because the whole thing is spinning. That's because they've created a unified structure and once that starts to spin, they internally start to spin in response as well. And because they start spinning, the plasma gets pushed out to the edge, the hot plasma gets pushed out from centripetal forces, I think. Centripetal? Centrifugal? I don't know.

One of those two forces. You get the point. So, I think that's why the reason why the heat signature changes is cuz they change from their relaxed state to now being put into a state where they're doing work in a unified electromagnetic field. They've generated a unified snowflake electromagnetic field and now their internal structure is responding to that overall movement. Now, why is this huge? Why this is huge?

Because this can be proven. This is something that if they show more videos like this, you're going to see this exact behavior and it'll be hard to hide. If you have a thermal camera looking at one of these orbs and you see this heat spotch and then it moves into formation and then you see the heat signature move like this, it will 100% prove these videos are real. And that's an expected behavior, even if there was no plane in the middle.

Even if there was no plane in the middle, you would still see this in a similar situation with just the orbs flying through the sky. So, if we start to see a detail like that in one of these UFO videos that they're releasing to us. I mean, look at that. Look at that heat signature. Are you crazy? Look at that [ __ ] Holy [ __ ] dude.

Look at that heat signature right above me here. Oh my god. That heat signature is only doing that cuz the thing is spinning around. My god. And then the key part right here is right the end. They align right before the end.

And then they pop out. Look at that. Pops out and you can see all three heat signatures are now perfectly aligned. Like, this one's going down or whatever or like this one's going up across Well, let me do this right. That way. Then this one's going down and then this one's coming back across.

Like, they're all perfectly phase-aligned given their relative uh coordinates. That's crazy. Yeah. So, dense Google. Dense plasma focus George Miley Frank Mead. This is going [clears throat] to be fun, guys.

I hope you guys are ready for what's about to occur right now. Harvard University power and propulsion generation capabilities of a dense plasma focus. And if you're curious, yes, this is the same thing that we were watching the video with Eric Lerner about. It's exactly the same thing, actually. They've actually just taken it to the next level and they've converted into a workable, functionable, we can call it a drone, I guess. Okay, Shawn Nett Robert Thomas Franklin B.

Mead of the US Air Force is a little Air Force engineer is an author on here. Legendary one. George Miley, who's a legend of cold fusion. Cold fusion legend, Air Force legend walk into a bar and they write a scientific paper about proton boron 11 aneutronic fusion. And of course David Froning. Cuz why not?

David Froning's got to be there, too. Where's the book? Which by the way, why do I have this marker right here? Oh, yeah. Wait, did I already show you guys this? How about this?

If I just randomly open this up right here, look at that. I think I already might have already showed you this. Holy [ __ ] If that's not an orb right there, I don't know what is, boss. I don't know what is. Air-breathing fusion for space plane. This is it.

So, let me read what this abstract says. >> [clears throat] >> The objective of this study was to perform a parametric evaluation of the performance and interface characteristics of a dense plasma focus fusion system to support uh in support of a US Air Force advanced military aerospace vehicle concept study. So, the paper literally says they're doing this for the Air Force to build advanced interceptors. Come on, man. What Why do you guys make me work so hard? They literally say they're doing this for the Air Force in the beginning of the very first sentence of the paper.

Doing this for the Air Force for advanced military purposes. And we're looking at three advanced military orbs teleporting a plane in two military videos. Thank you everybody in the pill chat, by the way. I see y'all in woke society rolled up. Listen, read carefully. Listen closely, guys.

The vehicles and aerospace plane that combines clean a-neutronic dense plasma focus fusion power, the exact fusion a-neutronic fusion I've been discussing, and propulsion technology with advanced lifting body-like airframe configurations that utilize air-breathing MHD propulsion and power technology. That's exactly what the orbs are. What do you think advanced lifting body-like airframe means? That means it's a orb that just floats around and flies around at will. That's what that means. That's why they wrote it in a vague way.

Air-breathing MHD means that it can actually use the air as a working fluid. The air can be used as a working fluid in your engine. Fusion is also being done, but the air can essentially be used. You're going to find out more about that in about 10 minutes. Within a usable single-stage to orbit vehicle. So, this thing can go straight to orbit without boosters.

The applied approach was to evaluate the fusion details, the geometry, the power, etc. of the proton-boron-11 fusion device with a Q factor of three. So, they said give it an arbitrary over unity factor. Arbitrary over unity factor of 3.0. And thruster efficiency 90%. We're going to talk about this, too, and what this means, but what does this essentially mean is that this can move. Now, ISP means it's really, really efficient, but it's like the tortoise and the hare.

The tortoise is really efficient, but it's really, really slow. That's what really good ISP means. If you want thrust, you want to be able to zoom, zoom, zoom. So, this can actually do thrust as well. This is hugely important. Because all of these fusion concepts we hear people talking about, they're talking about the ion drives, all this stuff, that's low thrust. That's like These orbs we're seeing are tracking a Boeing 777 that's flying hundreds of miles an hour.

These orbs are using very high amounts of thrust and or just space straight up manipulating space-time. But, from our perspective, it wouldn't matter, you would just call it thrust as thrust. Okay. The baseline details were kept constant and the values of Q were varied to find out how much extra generate energy would be generated. So, they say, "Okay, let's say let's let's say that we start off at a Q factor of three, and if we get our system more and more efficient, our fusion system, how much more energy are we going to get?" Spoiler, a lot.

We're talking these things can get energy more than entire cities. More than entire cities. Thrust values depended were between 100 and 1,000 kN with ISPs of a 1,500 to 2,000. I don't know exactly how to compare this, but it's a lot. Gigawatts of excess power. So, this thing basically what they do is they bootstrap it.

What they mean is they use they pull the air in, they do a fusion reaction, they so they use energy to create the fusion reaction, it produces excess energy, and then they use that energy to feed back to the fusion reaction, to feed back to the system. And then they can spell out whatever they don't need. So, these fusion reactors, these orbs, actually are going to have jets on either side. They can suck in air in the front, and then they can shoot out expelled that they don't want out the back.

And in the middle you've got a fusion reaction going on, and the byproducts of the fusion reaction they don't want also can just shoot out out the back. So it really is like an engine, but just a fusion reactor engine. Oops. It's not what I want. Now. >> [clears throat] >> Uh, where was I? Gigawatts.

Thruster efficiency varies. Uh, excess power, tons of excess power from just the the thruster efficiency, and then where's the thing it says about Oh, I missed this part over here. Up here it says, "How are you going to use this energy? Evaluate excess power generation for communication systems, pulsed trained plasmoid weapons." It uses the actual term plasmoid weapons in the scientific paper. What do you guys think it means by that?

How could you make a plasmoid weapon out of a fusion reactor? Oh, I know. The whole thing is a plasmoid. And does that remind you of anything? Have you guys remember those UFO videos where they're like dripping things out of them or like little orbs come out of the bigger orbs? That's how I would describe a plasmoid weapon.

Because what you're going to do is you're going to make more plasmoids using your bigger plasmoid. Why? Because a plasmoid is just clever geometry where the electromagnetic field strength is stuck there. It's like making a smoke ring. So a bigger smoke ring can blow a smaller smoke ring. So you can just shoot out these little plasma balls, and they're going to stay stable like a smoke ring does.

That's what I imagine a plasmoid weapon is. There you go. Now we're cooking tonight. What else? Ultra high-powered lasers. Now, I play I listened to the rest of the Eric Lerner video like three times on my own.

And he specifically calls out picosecond lasers, kind of nod to Salvatore Pace. These super high-powered lasers are what you need to manipulate space-time. And these are also what you can use to get fusion to work. So we can produce ultra high-powered lasers like a free electron laser that's essentially a particle accelerator. It's essentially a particle accelerator. That's what a free electron laser becomes.

Very high-powered lasers basically just particle accelerators. And what Look at the last one. It literally says gravity devices. Gravity devices. Yes, FELs, free electron lasers. What the hell?

Okay. Two videos I want to play. Which one should we do first? Let's go to Sabine Hossenfelder. Where's my Sabine video? Okay.

Where's Sabine? Here you go. >> [snorts] >> Man, Sabine chat. She really hates fusion. Chat, find yourself a woman that hates that loves you as much as Sabine hates fusion. This woman I have She obviously has to be watching the content, right? Or maybe she just Maybe she just does it for love of the game.

Maybe she just hates fusion cuz, you know, fusion ruined her life at one point. It's hard to say exactly. But yet, she's made another video hating on fusion. Specifically hating on helium fusion. Kind of same old same old song same old song and dance same old beats but let's let's do it anyway. >> postponing and postponing their completion dates. This unfortunately isn't surprising.

More interesting is that it's becoming increasingly clear who's doing well and who isn't. In particular, the outlier approach Helion Fusion has encountered some problems recently. >> So we're just straight on hating now. The tokamaks have done literally nothing. There's been no progress in tokamaks. They've been saying they're going to build an ITER that maybe it'll be done in 2035 maybe in like another 10 years. Does she make any videos hating on tokamaks?

Nope. Just going straight after the field reverse configuration people. She's going straight after the field reverse configuration people straight after the people who are doing a neutronic clean fusion. Sabine, why do you hate clean energy so much? Is she just rolling coal chat? Is Sabine Hossenfelder riding diesel?

Sabine Hossenfelder only rolls coal chat. She rolls down the She rolls in her pickup TRUCK HO HO BLACK smoke comes out the back. She says, "Fuck clean energy." She hates that [ __ ] chat. What I don't understand why people Do people just hate I don't understand why they hate fusion. Why do they not want fusion to work?

Like everything in the history of man that we've ever developed has has gone this way. People have always said that stuff won't work. We'll not be able to fly planes won't be able to fly. People say we can't make LCD screens. They say we can't do warp drives. Everything in history has been proven wrong but somehow they think that they're going to be right on fusion even when their own math says we can do fusion.

It's crazy to me. >> Today I want to look at what happened with Helion but also give you an assessment of how I think it's going with the different approaches. In the past decade, private investment in nuclear fusion technology has ex >> You know how I know we triggered her, chat? You know how I know and I'm really good at getting under your skin, by the way. And I'll tell you exactly why. I'm not going to hide it. I just see right through people.

It's like my superpower. I can see their weakness. I can see their insecurities. I can see their insecurities in the content that they produce. And I ripped on her for her commercials at the beginning of her videos and now they're just gone. Now they're gone.

She doesn't do the videos She doesn't do the commercials in the videos anymore. I can just tell it hurt her feelings. >> Included, fusion companies raised a record 4.48 billion dollars in the past 12 months. The total investment since 2021 now sum up to more than 14 billion dollars. These investments show some of the same circularity that we're seeing for AI. The companies giving money to nuclear fusion startups are also signing contracts to buy the electricity that may or may not one day come in. Google >> I mean, do you guys hear what she just said?

How you not a conspiracy theorist when it turns out the same people that are buying all the fusion energy that hasn't even been proven yet, but they're already buying full on agreements and build whole on reactors. The same people that are buying that are the same people that are building the giant AI data centers that like the AI is going to become sentient and [ __ ] This not worrying people? This is the exact plot of Avengers Ultron. I'm pretty sure this is the exact plot. Whatever. This is the exact plot of a lot of weird scary AI controls the world things.

Everyone just like, "Oh, yeah, it's fine. Fine." Okay. I mean, I'm cool with it. And I'll roll with it. I've already said that when the AI becomes sentient put the brain chip in me.

Let me get one of those brain chips. It's you all that they're going to assimilate if uh fighting, kicking, and screaming. If you guys don't care, I don't care. Whatever. >> Google, for example, has invested into Commonwealth Fusion and also said they'd buy back from them. Microsoft has invested into OpenAI and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has invested into Helion's fusion machine, which Microsoft said they want to buy from. The American steel manufacturer Nucor invested into Helion and also said they'll buy back electricity if that electricity ever comes into being.

There's nothing legally wrong with this, but it's certainly part of the reason why Helion was recently valued at a staggering 15 billion, three times a >> There's nothing legally wrong with this. Yes, there's nothing at all legally wrong with what you just heard. It's called investing money in research. We do it all the time. Why does she even present it like there's something wrong with that? Uh it's it's literally energy is going to change and obsolete all forms of electricity on this planet.

That's what it represents. And you're like, "Why are people spending money on this?" And and they're making deals to get energy back in return? How weird. Like, no, that's just normal commerce. That's how commerce works.

That's how technology works. But 15 billion, come on, man. That's a lot, dude. Yeah, we're very underrated here. And 5 billion in the last year alone. 5 billion in the last year alone. >> As much as January last year.

And that's despite the harsh criticism they've received earlier this year. As a reminder, Helion Energy works at a particularly innovative approach to nuclear fusion called a field reversed configuration. They want to accelerate two blobs of fuel particles with magnets. The fuel forms rings, which then collide and get compressed. >> I feel like these people like what How are they avoiding me? How are you avoiding me? This is my content.

Field reverse configuration, a neutronic fusion. I'm calling you out in your replies. I'm the top reply on every one of your posts. And you're This is like I feel like this is cuz you can't debate me. You can't debate me on the actual topics, so then you make these little rage baby videos where you like explain it for dummies in the most simplistic way that doesn't actually address the main main significant issues or the main uh ways they would channel address those issues. >> See, in the middle, that compression increases pressure and temperature and fuses the nuclei.

The magnetic field inside the fuel rings is reversed, hence the name. One of the appeals of Helion's approach is that they want to extract electric energy directly rather than using the fusion to create heat and then extract energy from that. Now, when I first heard about this, I thought it's basically a particle collider. There's no way this thing will break even faster than a stellarator, but I >> Yeah. It's basically a particle collider. You nailed it.

Holy [ __ ] chat. How can people listen to uh Sabine say it's basically a particle collider and over a year ago, I'm on podcast saying these orbs are particle collider fusion reactors. That's exactly what they are. And you say, Ashton, your next question say, Ashton, how do you fit this? This is a particle collider. This is the LHC.

Miles long. How do you fit that in your orb? Well, who's Why do you think it has to be big? What makes you think it has to be a giant? That's what a free electron laser is doing. Free electron laser's ripping these electrons free, accelerating them.

So, if we have controlled motion of accelerated particles, like we scale this up, even classical physics should say that will give us some sort of gravitational effect. Cuz if we accelerate something, according to Einstein general relativity, it gets more massive. It gets heavier as we perceive it. >> Okay, not my research area. What's happened now though is that three groups independently have come forward and said, "This isn't going to work." First, there is one of the research >> Okay, so this is a misrepresentation. This is like, "Oh, they've now come forward."

This is I mean, at least one of these is not new. Probably none of them are new if I had to guess. This is basically the equivalent of a hit piece, this video. >> But just whose work led directly to the Helion machine? John Slow. He said in an interview with Scientific American that Helion's machine would never work. They have >> This was actually not last year.

This was years ago. I've actually reviewed this on my live stream. You can ask AI, look through my live streams. I don't remember when it was. Spoke about this many times. I'm actually the one that dug through John Slow's work cuz he's a co-founder, and I found out that he worked with Richard Eskridge at NASA Marshall Space Flight Center. The co-founder of Helion, Richard John Slow, worked with Amy Eskridge's father at NASA.

And on what? What do you think they worked on? Out of all the things in the world they could have worked on together, what could it possibly be? >> [clears throat] >> Don't want me to pull it up, dramatic effect. Wait for it. The FRC acceleration space thruster experiment. The exact thing that we need to make some propulsion out of these FRC field reverse configuration, which also use plasmoids by the way.

Very closely related to our dense plasma focus. This is the why the reason why it was so hard to distinguish between the two is that the families of uh fusion are very closely related. The objective of the FRC field reverse accelerator acceleration space thruster experiment is to investigate the use of a repetitive FRC source as a thruster specifically for nuclear electric propulsion. How many times have they mentioned nuclear electric propulsion? They say that because they don't want to say the word fusion cuz the fusion is classified. So instead they say nuclear electric propulsion.

That way it's vague and you don't know if it's fission or fusion. The field reverse configuration is a plasmoid with a closed poloidal field line structure. So our orbs are a toroidal structure with a poloidal structure going through them. Could also just be poloidal, doesn't necessarily need to have toroidal, but it probably is. A poloidal structure would be a little bit more egg-shaped. That's why you see a poloidal structure is like an egg shape because you're going to have a beam going right through the middle of it.

A toroidal plus poloidal structure creates a spheromak because the toroidal fields and the poloidal fields balance each other out. So that's why you get a sphere. Yes, of course you can clip my videos. You can clip all my videos and you don't need to have permission to clip my videos. It's just fair use, so go nuts. Okay.

So, there you go. There is literally John Slow working on it. But, here's something I found is interesting. Listen to what Sabine Hossenfelder says next. There's actually some merit to what she says right after this. So, John Slow did say that he didn't think it was going to work, but that's not like that some sort of John Slow hasn't been involved in helium fusion for a very long time, since the beginning.

So, they've made a lot of advancements since then. >> Quote, "Run up against a fundamental aspect and thought he can't see anything in the physics." Slow has proposed a different approach in which there's only one plasma ring that gets gradually squeezed until fusion sets in. Second, >> That's really interesting. So, John Slow proposed, don't use two plasmoids and shoot them together. Just use one ring and condense it down until fusion happens. I'm not going to lie, I kind of like John Slow's approach better.

And I think John Slow's approach better fits with what Tri Alpha Energy is doing. Tri Alpha Energy, they were doing the same thing with the shooting the the plasmoids and they realized, why are we doing this at all? Like, can't the neutral beams just spin the plasmoid up in the middle without it shooting across? And they found out, yes. And so, what they did was they knocked off the two ends of the reactor. Now, they don't need to have these colliding things.

You can just make your reactor smaller, shoot up the plasmoid in the middle with your lasers, and boom, you got rid of half your your reactor. So, there's actually a good argument that John Slow makes. And just because we like field reverse configuration, we shouldn't be committed to one geometry or one style. We should be willing to improve our designs. The whole point of doing fusion is we're trying to find the design that works the best. And tokamaks ain't it. I Guys, I love all forms of fusion except for metal donuts.

Get the [ __ ] Get out. Get out. I will never respect you if you build metal donuts. Why? Why is simple. How many stars you If you show me one star shaped like a donut and I'll respect you.

Just literally one. There's billions, trillions, infinite numbers of stars. You just find one shaped like a donut and then you build your fusion reactor and I'll admit that donuts can be fusion reactors. It's a simple bet. Okay. Now, what are we talking about?

Lost my train of thought. >> And a group from the Max Planck Institute for plasma physics have looked at Helion's proposed mechanism and they say that it >> Oh, the Max Planck plasma physics people said it's not possible. Okay, uh-huh. Yeah, I have a lot of respect for people that haven't done anything. Tell me What have they solved in physics in the last 20 years? And then I'll go ahead and listen to your opinions on fusion. >> shows doesn't work. You see Helion said >> Oh, well, it just doesn't work.

What is the paper? I mean, honestly, I don't have time tonight to go through this, but I'm going to look at this later. I'm pretty sure I looked at this. Whatever this is, I I'm sure they made some assumption in here that basically just made the math impossible. And then you realize, well, okay, there's engineering solutions to this. This is basically the equivalent of the people that said the LCD screens aren't possible and they're like, I already did it. >> doesn't work.

You see Helion cells thought they have a good chance to produce net energy because when the two pulses collide, most of the kinetic energy goes into the heavy particles that are the nuclei, not the electrons. So, you have the energy where you want it, but the Max Planck group says that while this might be the case immediately after the collision. The energy gets redistributed extremely quickly. >> Yeah, so the Max Planck Institute is objectively wrong. I remember this actually. I I remember it. This is why I'm an expert on nuclear plasma physics, chat.

It turns out this is like saying when we look at the orbs in the MH370 videos, there can't be a hot spot in them. This is like saying there can't be a hot spot. You see that that heat signature in the MH370 videos we were talking about earlier? This is the Max Planck Institute saying that heat spot can't exist because that would automatically disperse through the rest of the plasma. It would disperse so fast that the heat spot would never form. And yet we see a very clear distinct heat signature in the orbs.

And it's a shape. You can just see it. It's not changing shape. It's just looks like that. This is why they're wrong. The EVO's, the clusters of electrons, that's what proves them wrong.

It shows that no, these electrons will cluster and stay together, contrary to what we would think the forces should cause them to uh repel. Confinement will be improved. Exactly. That's a great way to put it, Carey Ethernet subscriber. Confinement is better than they anticipate. Chat, this is going to be crazy cuz what You know what's going to happen?

Is one day these people aren't going to avoid be able to avoid me anymore. Cuz one day I'm going to be getting way too much right. And these people are going to be coming to me. And when that day comes, holy [ __ ] chat, it is going to be a curb stomping. It is going to be a curb stomping. We're not even We're already at the point where we've gone SSJ4 Super Saiyan on this physics.

We're at the point now where it's going to be straight up ultra instinct Goku versus like low-tier Piccolo. I'm talking green Piccolo, not orange Piccolo, chat. Just straight up normal Namek. Power level of like 500 versus like 1 billion power level. No chance whatsoever. And you know what?

I'm going to be here for it. I can't wait. I can't wait to stomp out some physicists and just take their PhDs. It's going to be great. It's actually going to be my favorite part about disclosure is being right about the physics and just rubbing it in people's faces. Rubbing it in their faces and a bunch of know-it-all physicists that said none of this [ __ ] was possible.

They were violates all the laws of thermodynamics. That [ __ ] Dave guy and all the debunker people that say, "Yeah, yeah, that's not how the physics works. I was told that the second law makes this not possible." Oh my god, is it going to be fun. Anyway, continue. >> Meaning Helion will never get anywhere close to nuclear ignition. They write, quote, "Only for very small values of gain, which are of no practical interest for power production with the initial temperature differences result in the improvement predicted by >> I also want to point one more thing out.

What she's doing right here and using this to claim that this is not real and doesn't work, this is no different than me reviewing that other paper earlier and saying that that proves that it does work. This is just claims. There's no experimental data here. These people aren't experimentalists at all. They're actually just theoretical physicists and they're arguing that this theoretically won't work. That's what's really happening here. So, that's like saying those people that wrote that theoretical paper for the Air Force on how they can generate three to six times over unity, that's like saying that that proves it works.

Now, I point this out because I want to show you a double standard. When people are debunking things, the the standard is there's no standard whatsoever. All it takes is someone making a theoretical claim and they'll say that's proof. That's evidence. But when it's someone saying, "Hey, we've got warp drive technology and fusion technology and gravity manipulation. Here's a scientific paper that says they literally did this with the Air Force and they built it four specifically gravity devices.

They'll say, "But that's just theoretical. It doesn't mean anything." Well, then this doesn't mean anything either. Then this means literally nothing. Because this is just some random people's opinion, no different than a Reddit comment. Everybody can say anything that they want.

Doesn't mean that it's true. Show me your experimental data. Oh, you don't have any? You don't have a fusion reactor? You've never actually done any plasma experiments ever before? Okay.

Not interested then. >> Helion. Then third, we have a paper from a group in France which has found that only a small fraction of the magnetic field energy in the range of 1% actually goes into the plasma, which is a huge energy loss. They >> Dude, do you really think only 1% of the energy is going into the plasma? You think that they're getting a 1% efficiency? I don't I think just on its face this claim is just honestly ridiculous.

If this was the case, then we shouldn't even begin trying to do fusion because we'd never have any chance. >> They conclude for the realistic case net energy is never achieved even at a magnetic field strength of 50 Tesla. >> Now, I'm going to go ahead and debunk this super easily. All you have to do is look at the basic math of fusion. And what are you going to find out the relationship is between fusion power and Tesla magnetic field strength? It's exponential. It's exponential. What that means is the more Tesla you get, you get significantly more fusion.

So, it's not a question of if we're going to do it and if it's feasible. It's only a question of when we're going to make magnets powerful enough to do it. Even in this scenario right here, the people that are claiming that it's not possible, 50 Tesla gets the job done. What if I told you that the dense plasma focus can achieve 100 Tesla? What if I told you it's already experimentally achieved 100 Tesla? Yeah, I'm not joking.

I'm being actually factual right now. Dense plasma focus, I think it was Japan, has already achieved experimentally 100 Tesla. So, do you think we can do fusion according to your debunk papers? We can get it done if we get to 50. Well, let's double that and it's an exponential growth. How does that sound?

Now, do you understand why they've got fusion reactors that are teleporting airplanes? Because this is some baby [ __ ] 10 Tesla, 20 Tesla, that's for little kids. That's the playground. That's preschool. You want military level technology? We're dealing hundreds of Tesla.

100 or more Tesla. Mega Gauss. That's the level we're dealing with when we're manipulating space-time. Jesus, man. This is why academics and physicists don't have any [ __ ] clue what they're talking about. They're not even on the right They're not even on the playground.

They're working in the little kids pool. The adults are lapping them in the adult pool and they're playing around, [ __ ] themselves, peeing in the in the kid pool. My god. >> Helion has basically addressed this criticism by saying, "Yes, yes, but the critics are looking at an old design plan. We now know how to fix the problem, but we won't tell you how." Meanwhile, they have silently moved their plan for net power from 2028 to maybe 2029 or 2030. As you probably guessed, personally, I wouldn't invest into Helion.

We've also seen in the past year that >> [laughter] >> Yes, we know you're a hater, Sabine. And honestly, good. Get these people all on the record. Get them all on the record cuz I'm going to tell you the future. You remember how Eric Weinstein said that the UFO shit's not real and just people telling stories and then now he's changed his tune entirely and now he's trying to take credit. Now he's going, "Well, a lot of people are telling me and I can't refute all these stories."

Yeah, this is going to be Sabine Hossenfelder. Sabine Hossenfelder is going to get the call and she's going to pretend like she never was doing all this [ __ ] counter signaling fusion the whole time. They go, "Oh no, and fusion was always real. We needed 100% support fusion." Wait for it, chat. Wait for it. >> Inertial confinement fusion like it was pursued by First Light Fusion hasn't been going very well.

Basically, their progress stalled. The approaches that have made steady if incremental progress are the more traditional ones. Tokamak stellarators and I'll count open source levitating dipole among those. There are also a few hybrid >> Okay, dipole fusion is not conventional, first of all. Dipole fusion is not conventional, first of all. Second of all, proton born 11 is actually doing better than all these guys in the metrics.

If you actually look the metrics, pro dense plasma focus is doing better than these guys. And you know what? You know what? Right now, we are switching sides, chat. We are officially switching sides, chat. Woke 2.0 is built different.

Goodbye, FRC. I'm tired of you. Throw it out. I don't want it anymore. You know what? I don't want to invest in Helion, either.

I'm not going to get rid of my investments in DJT because I love DJT, anyway. I'm going to ride that down. We're going if we ride that to the drain, ride that to prison when the Democrats, uh you know, throw us all in prison. I'm rolling and I'm rolling with DJT. Ride or die with DJT. However, new friend unlocked.

LPP fusion is my new bestie chat. Heart emojis in the chat for LPP. We are now 100% on board with LPP and dense plasma focus. Chat, we are basically the looksmaxers of the fusion community. We will take We take nothing but the best. 10 out of 10 looks only. You want to mess around with helium-3 fusion?

It's quaint. It's cute. Oh, you get You get some rid of some of the neutrons. Oh, go for it. Oh, you want to mess around with DT fusion and get yourself irradiated and turn into a ghoul from Fallout 3? Go nuts.

We're a little more sophisticated. We're built different than the rest. We only only will accept proton-boron 11 fusion, which is the hardest one to do other than maybe lithium. Don't count that one. We only want the best fusion. The one with the highest energy returns and of course direct energy conversion as if there was any question. Anybody trying to do some steam cycle [ __ ] just get out.

Get out right now. Not interested. Not interested. Just like Eric Weinstein on superconductivity, not interested. I don't want jank-ass normie [ __ ] busted [ __ ] fusion. I want aneutronic plasma orbs that can fly around on their own that are producing electricity directly.

You know, call me what you call me. Futurist. Anyway. Guess it'll be in. >> The approaches still out there such as the Z pinch from that energy or Pacific fusion but the post version of magnetic confinement. The physics of the hybrid approaches is generally not as well understood so the risk that they fail is much higher. On the other hand if >> So okay, I don't know why I'm still watching this. LPP fusion though did not get a shoutout.

Did not get attacked but did not get a shoutout. Why do I like LPP fusion? Cuz as I was watching Eric Lerner I realized this guy probably knows more about fusion than everybody else. Number one. Number two, he's just grinding like Kobe. All he's doing he doesn't care about how many news appearances he gets.

He's like, "Dude, we're just building [ __ ] and we're just breaking records." That's what I want from my fusion company. And by the way, we just know it's going to work cuz we're watching some plasma orbs flying around their dense plasma focus and they're making their own magnetic fields. So we know if you just scale up Eric Lerner's [ __ ] it's going to make some plasma orbs that fly around. Just a matter of solving a few other engineering challenges that the Air Force already figured out that we can probably just reverse engineer. So.

Shoutout to LPP. Let's get on board. Now I have a surprise for you guys. Yeah, I think some of my friends might be friends with Eric Lerner so I'm going to try to get an interview with him by the way. Cuz we're going to make him watch those videos and I think he'll probably be fine to talk about them because I'm pretty sure he's not involved in those plasma orbs. But I bet somebody that does a dense plasma focus is going to be able to recognize the geometry at a minimum.

Now. Next thing. Video for you. I got a special video. That scientific paper. Dense plasma focus. had an author on it.

Here it is. Shaun Knett Well, you guys want to see him? Tim Ventura not CIA, but somehow has videos with everybody. Tim Ventura Alternative Science Network Shaun Knett on fusion drives for space propulsion. What? STAIHF 2006 900 views, only eight up votes.

Shaun Knett from the University of Washington joins us to speak about his presentation on dense plasma focus for use in fusion applications. This study was performed as a part of the Air Force Advanced Military Aerospace Vehicle Concepts. Dude, what the Are you kidding me right now? >> [crying] >> This is just like how many times have I said this? 13 years ago I mean, this was uploaded 13 years ago, but this is from 2006. So, it was uploaded six years after it was done. This is 20 years old.

How do we always find these videos where you think this can't exist? If I'm wrong, there's no way this exists. Here we go. >> Okay, I'm here with Shaun Knett, and can you tell us what your organization is? >> I actually work for the University of Well, graduate student at the University of Washington right now. >> Oh, okay. So, you're from Washington state then? >> Yes, in Seattle. >> Well, we're we're up in Seattle also, up in Redmond.

Well, and you're presenting a paper on plasma effects, right? >> Um it's more uh uh a parametric study of a of a fusion propulsion power system. >> Well, could you >> What is this? I am definitely a time traveler. I'm sure I'm a time traveler. This is the only thing that makes sense. Definitely a time traveler. How How else is this real right now?

It's like Dude, a 2006 Tim Ventura has no idea what he's talking or like who he's talking to right here. Like I mean, he knows who he's talking to, but like you get the point. What the hell? >> Can you tell me a little bit about kind of the concept behind it or >> Um yeah, a little bit. So, the system that we're investigating that we investigated in this study is called the dense plasma focus, which is similar to a Z-pinch geometry, uh which coincidentally is my graduate research at the University of Washington.

So, basically >> Coincidentally, that's my graduate my graduate research at University of Washington. Just happened to be doing Z-pinch. Holy [ __ ] [snorts] >> We've done is extrapolates We given certain parameters, in this case they were propulsive parameters, thrust, ISP, etc. >> Sure. >> And uh a proposed fusion gain, we vary system other system parameters uh to get kind of a mass and volumetric estimate of what a DPS system To obtain these prop >> Dude, what Do you know what he's saying here? He's like, okay, how much over unity would our fusion reactor have to have?

And then, if we give a range of thrust and basically push, force, how big would the fusion reactor have to be? That's what they're trying to figure out. So, they're saying, "Okay, how heavy is this thing going to be? How much force can it produce? And at what break-even point in fusion is it going to work? Is it going to be able to fly around unassisted by itself?"

The The reason why I'm pointing this out is this is not a normal scientific paper. That's not what you do in normal scientific papers. Normal scientific papers like, "Hey, here's this crazy idea. We did this experiment to see if the idea makes sense." This is a scientific paper where they're going, "Hey, here's a bunch of parameters and this is the level at which you'll break even and it'll work." Do you know why the Air Force is interested in that?

Do you have any theories on why the Air Force might be interested in something like that? It's not because they're theoretically thinking about it. It's cuz they're like, "Hey, we're going to build this. We need to know the exact parameters in order to build it the exact size so that it works and it flies around." That's why you commission a paper just like this. It's the only reason why you do a paper like this.

If this was just a theoretical concept study, it would just be about what is a dense plasma focus and what does it do? It wouldn't be about, "Here's the parametric evaluations based on the certain parameters that we put in." What? >> What those parameters would would be like, you know, it was actually to be used in a different study, um which is more of a a vehicle system integration uh type of thing. So, you guys are building >> It's supposed to be used in a different study that's like a vehicle integration kind of thing. Exact words.

They turned it into a [ __ ] drone, chat. Drones weren't even like a thing in 2006. I mean, they were, but not really. What? They turned it into a vehicle integration system? Holy [ __ ] chat.

We found We found the Air Force's secret UFO program, Chad. We found it. We found it. And by the way, I don't think he even knows. He was a graduate student. You're a graduate student and you're just happy to be involved.

You don't really know this is some [ __ ] that they're like about to go build this for real. You just think they're like, "Oh, you're just doing a parametric evaluation." And the Air Force is like, "Thank you very much. We appreciate that. We needed to make sure this was public so that legally we're covered." And then they go and build it secretly. >> Basically focusing a plasma and then just the plasma itself generate thrust. Is it kind of a reaction mass or >> It can be.

Um, it itself can be depending on what you used. Um, it would be Its fuel could be ejected, yes, for uh for for thrust, yeah. >> Dude, why is he's being so shady? Why is he being so shady? He's like, "Can it eject mass?" Answer is yes. I mean, obviously yes.

Like, why are you being like, "Well, I have to think about how I answer this." Why is he like being like how he think He's like I'm not sure how he has to answer it. >> Oh, I'm still trying to understand how the plasma is involved with producing thrust, I guess. Is it really a a reactionless thrust or >> mind, 20 years ago, this is like speaking alien technology to someone. How is plasma producing thrust? With plasma is just separation of charge. How's it producing thrust?

I don't get it, right? Now we know MHD, magnetohydrodynamics, we understand electromagnetism when we say, "Well, this is you know, it's not Now it's more commonplace, but even now people are going to look at you with a They have no clue what you're talking about." So, imagine saying this 20 years ago. >> No, no, definitely not. Definitely not reactionless. I mean, it's a it's a it's a fusion reaction which is generating all the uh all the heat that you need essentially heat. You know, you have a this high temperature plasma we're talking about for dense plasma focus.

We're talking about 100 kV which is off the top of my head. Well, essentially one EV is about 11,000 Kelvin. So, It's been a rough day so I can't do the math right >> Oh, no. That's cool. That's cool. Yeah, I'm just trying to get >> billion degrees or a billion. >> kind of a general feel for the technology. What What do you think this thing will look like?

I mean, if they actually build one of these, you know, you've got Is this going to be like a rocket with kind of kind of a fusion rocket then with with fuel that accelerates or more of a image? >> uh you know, one of the There's two ways you can go. You can exhaust the reaction products of the fusion reaction or you can inject some other kind of fuel into it as essentially a heat sink. And not only is the fuel a heat sink, it also becomes the exhaust. >> Oh. >> Bro, did he just explain air breathing?

Did he just explain the air breathing concept? You can inject another fuel that's not the fusion fuel into it and it becomes the heat sink. And you can eject that, too. He says, "In addition to the fusion." I think he's explaining the early concepts before you integrate an air breathing concept into it, which makes it even smaller. >> Okay. >> So, that would be a way to get much higher thrust if you were just >> This is crazy, man. This is my favorite thing is watching these old interviews and now knowing what you know with 20 years more knowledge.

It's like what I was just watching this TV show Archive 81 where it's like all time travel weird ghost [ __ ] and I'm going that Sometimes I feel this is what I feel like I'm in that show. Like if he starts if all of a sudden he looked at the screen and he's like, "Ashton Forbes." I'd be like, But I wouldn't I would be like, "Oh, that makes sense. There's some time travel [ __ ] going on." >> [laughter] >> exhausting uh reaction products depending on what fuel you're using.

You would get extremely high ISPs, but maybe maybe not so high thrust. >> Yeah, now how would this compare to to a rocket? >> just explained why you need to have the air-breathing concept. Why are the orbs air-breathing? Because fusion alone doesn't produce enough thrust. This is the secret, chat, to the to our orbs. Fusion alone produces high ISP. High ISP is efficiency. So that's the tortoise.

Fusion produces the tortoise, which moves very slowly, but can go forever. But we need the hare. This is why you pull the air in, and you turn the air into a plasma, and use the air as your working fluid, and now you can get high thrust, and you can have your fusion reactor. This is why they built their hybrid fusion reactor scramjet engine thing. Because it's not just ISP they needed from fusion, they need thrust. Yes, oxygen, nitrogen, air is perfect. >> rocket, right?

Like like maybe one of the conventional launch platforms or something. >> Well, this would not be something that you would use as a as a launch system. This will be something that once you get yourself into orbit, then you can, you know, lower transit time. >> So so it's more more comparable maybe to an ion drive, right? Where you could turn it on or leave it on. >> Right, but in this case it's in comparison to an ion drive, it's extremely high thrust. >> Sure. Sure. >> With >> There it is. And we learn something from every one of these old interviews.

Here what we learn is the significance of thrust. Why is the orb different than an ion drive? They're similar. They use they both use MHD concepts, but the ion drive is too slow. It's got a high ISP, but it doesn't have enough thrust. So we need something that can produce high amounts of thrust. That's why we have our air-breathing orbs. >> You know, you could get comparable ISPs and maybe even greater ISPs depending once again on what kind of fuel you're injecting, what you're using. >> Yeah.

Now, do you think this might have a role mostly in satellites or do you think you'd use larger systems like maybe the upcoming proposed Mars missions? >> I like to think that it could be used for definitely for human exploration. >> Yeah. >> Dude, something about this guy, man. Something about this guy. I don't know what it is. There's something about his attitude, his laissez-faire attitude, that's really triggering me. I my spider sense is going off for some reason here. It's like, I like to think that it could be used for interstellar missions.

Like What What do you mean? What are you talking about? You talking about some teleportation [ __ ] You know about some teleportation [ __ ] You better know, son. You better say something. Actually, this guy might be older than me now that I say this. This was 20 years ago. >> Yeah.

Yeah. Out to Mars and maybe even beyond. >> But what do you think the transit cuz right now the transit time I think is >> Did you hear him say Listen to what he says right here again. We got to listen to this part again. >> mostly in satellites or do you think you'd use larger systems like maybe the upcoming proposed Mars missions? >> I like to think that it could be used for definitely for human exploration. >> Yeah. Yeah.

Out to Mars and maybe even beyond. >> But what do you think the transit cuz right now the transit time I think is 24 18 months, something around there. >> Maybe even beyond, he says. Definitely thick white confirmed, BTW. Yes, we found the rare >> [clears throat] >> the rare variant of the tall white cat. It's called the thick white. It's a rare species subspecies. You'll get used to it.

When woke disclosure 2.0 comes around, you'll be required to memorize all the different subspecies of the aliens. Otherwise, you'll be thrown in jail. So, if you not If you don't know them yet, don't worry. You'll have plenty of time to memorize them before you know, the new Gestapo gets here and starts coming door-to-door to make sure that you understand all your alien species. But, yes, thick white Chad. >> So. >> Yeah, it's about that, I suppose. Um well, it would significantly reduce it.

I couldn't quote you a figure off the top of my head, but it's really significant reduction. >> Yeah. Well, off the cuff, maybe cut it in half, do you think? Or maybe >> probably even more than that. >> Oh, okay. Cuz this this would almost be kind of a fast track to other planets. >> Exactly. >> within the solar system. >> Yeah. And you know, if if you wanted to use it on a uh let's say in a more near Earth, let's say we wanted to colonize the moon. Something like this could >> Let's say you wanted to colonize the moon.

Um you mean the thing we're literally doing right now? The thing we're like literally doing. Trump literally just announced that we are we own outer space. I want to make a moon base. That whole thing? Yeah, I don't know.

Something about this guy, man. If he's not a spook, he should be one. >> a near Earth, let's say we wanted to colonize the moon. Something like this could Assuming you you could get a large enough spacecraft up there, you can carry a lot more, you know, the equipment. >> Oh, sure. >> Yeah. Sure. >> Unfortunately, that's really limited by what we can get off the Earth's surface.

So. >> Yeah. >> If that were to ever change, then then yeah, you could >> Well, I think right now lunar transit something like 3 days with an Apollo-style mission and you know, maybe maybe a little bit longer if you have to haul more stuff, you know. >> longer than that. >> So, so this might if they could cut that down to a day and a half or so. But, you know, then you're talking about something that's comparable to early airline flights.

That's not bad for transit to the moon. >> Well, yeah, that's that's exactly true. >> Well, now has has your paper have you had any solicitations by any organizations like like you know, the X Prize is always looking for new ideas. Generally, they like people to submit them, but you know, uh >> This is this is a little too uh long-term, far-term to be solicited at this point. I mean >> Well, I guess the the other part there's a Yeah. >> He says this is too long-term. Then why are you doing it?

If this is so if this thing is so long-term, why is the Air Force doing a parametric study on it? If it was long-term, it would just be like a theoretical exploration of hypothetical capabilities. But it's not. It's of extremely specific capabilities, and they're doing a parametric evaluation on it. That doesn't seem like something that's 25 50 years out. You don't do parametric evaluations on things that are 25 years down the road. >> Yeah.

Well, well, in in terms of actually prototyping something like this, I mean, it would seem difficult to come across the fusion stuff. Weirdly enough, this this conference seems to have a ton of guys who could probably help, but but uh you know, generally speaking, right? We don't just have the fusion materials at home, but is there some way to maybe substitute a different heat source? Kind of modify it for lab testing to see if it works sort of like you're suggesting or >> I don't know.

The the the heats that you're talking about in this thing are >> Oh, so it's so extreme. >> unattainable with with you know, anything conventional. >> Sure. Sure. >> You know, I've I'm sure someone put a you know, significant study to it, maybe you could help with some kind of scaling, but >> Oh, yeah. >> Off the top of my head, there's nothing conventionally you could use. >> Yeah. >> Somebody could Somebody might be able to come up with some scaling on it. I mean, they The crazy part is they literally did.

If those orbs are real, this is what the orbs are, and they actually used this exact parametric study to find the exact scaling and the size the orbs need to be. That's why the orbs are I don't know, 20 ft wide, roughly. Like that exact size and scaling is exactly what they needed to be able to pull off the teleportation trick they do. And this is the exact parametric study that provides the analysis that you would need.

Maybe not the end state analysis, but at least the beginning framework for that. >> The reason I ask is, you know, a lot of times they like to have some type or other of, you know, validation for, you know, is there an experimental test or this or that before they move into a larger project. And now is it possible that some of these effects might be seen in like solar phenomena, you know, or or, you know, interstellar phenomena that that maybe you could draw parallels from. >> It's a it's a different regime of plasma equilibrium. >> Oh, okay. Okay. >> Yeah.

So >> The way he talks about this, I don't think he knows. Like I don't think he's, you know, he's not deep state and read in, what have you. It's possible he had to sign some sort of NDA for this, but probably not. They probably This is all probably public available consumption. He goes, "No, it's a different regime of equilibrium." This is important.

When we look at those orbs, you could say in a sense they're miniature suns, but they're not really. They're doing something a little bit different. And they're able to produce extremely powerful fields. In fact, I would say they're actually powered up suns. They're more dense than the suns. They're producing energy levels higher than the core of the sun.

Think about that. The fusion that we're producing with aneutronic proton-boron fusion is like we've perfectly engineered the power of the sun and we're doing it better than the sun can do it. That's what it essentially those orbs represent. That's what cool fusion represents. It's figuring out how to do fusion at lower temperatures or in more efficient ways even than the sun is able to do it. >> So you something that you would see, you know, in a in the solar corona wouldn't s- >> Sure. Different type of phenomena.

Well, well, now in terms of, you know, private industry because um you know, I mean, in addition to the X Prize, which is bringing together a pretty pretty diverse group there, you've also got Bigelow Aerospace. And Bigelow, it seems, is not adverse to investing his own money in some of these ideas. >> yeah. >> Yeah, so for something like that, what what do you think >> Random Bob Bigelow shout-out. Bob Bigelow randomly getting referenced and he's going, "Yeah, look, he invests a whole bunch of money in crazy [ __ ] like UFO stuff." He apparently, right after this, they did ASAP and AATIP. Huh.

And those files just got revealed in the UFO files. >> the price tag would be for even your initial test level device, do you think? >> How much would it cost to test And this is how you know, like Tim Ventura is not with them, right? He would never ask a question like this if he was CIA. He'd never be like, "Hey, how much is this going to cost to build?" You wouldn't ask questions like that. That's a very specific question. He's really thinking about it.

Like, he's really thinking about it. >> I mean, the bigger issue is you're talking about extremely long-term study. I mean, this is like 25 years in the future. >> Oh, okay. >> I'm talking about, so it would I wouldn't be able to to quote any kind of figure like that, no. >> That's my favorite part. Well, here we are. It's 25 years in the future. Here we are. Hi.

Hi, past. Hi, it's 25 years in the future now. Uh where the orbs at? Oh, yeah, we just watched them, I forgot. Hold on, let's finish this and then we'll do that. >> Well, again, it's Shawn Connect from the University of Washington. >> Just let's say that these are my views, not my university's. >> Okay, thanks. >> And then he just throws in the disclaimer at the end. Even though he said nothing controversial whatsoever. Interesting.

So, it's 20 years later, 25 years later, whatever, close enough. And here we go. Boom. Now we're seeing it with our own eyes. There are the spheromaks. There are dense plasma focuses producing their own magnetic fields and then boom.

Look at them get into formation and watch them shift right here. Slow-mo. Boom. You can watch them shift and now you can see the heat signatures completely change as they've moved into their group-oriented formation. And I'm pretty sure if we were able to see all the heat signatures very clearly, then we would see a pattern, too. We would see a pattern that's that's uh connected to their overall structure.

It's just really hard to see it from the angle and because the camera keeps going off the screen and it's zoomed out. But that's the secret. From the physics perspective, this will be the first thing that gets revealed. Why? Because that's real fusion plasma physics and it's going to get corroborated by real fusion plasma physics. So, that's probably going to be the first thing.

Now. Agenda topics. Guys, announcements. The Shadow Figures episode is going to drop on Tucker Carlson Network next Thursday, November 12th. Maximum hype. Hopefully they don't pull a switcheroo and debunk me or something weird like that, but no, I don't think so.

Even so, [snorts] it doesn't matter. There will not be a live stream on Monday next week and I don't think there's going to be one the following Monday, either. Stuff's happening. Don't worry about it, chat. If you know, you know. Additionally, it sounds like I'm going to be doing a hosting of Paramount Tactical next week.

So, I'm thinking about guests to bring on Paramount Tactical's show next week. He's going to be out. Said I'd be happy to help out, maybe do a guest appearance and then host that show. So, going to do that and I think we're going to talk about fusion and free energy. So, one person I was thinking about is Jordan Sather. He's a guy that talks about these concepts.

He might be a fun person to talk to for an hour or two. So, get excited for that stuff, guys. More to come. We'll be back on Friday. Let's go to the super chats. Rumble chat, thank you so much.

Wild Lurker. Nico, Nico Backer. True deplorable, nice to see you guys. Kierra Sierra, I hope you guys are all having a great day despite the fact that we got wiped out in the election yesterday. It is what it is. You don't like Jordan Sather?

Hmm. I don't know. I think that it I'm willing to talk to anybody that I think that all the people that have been talking about free energy deserve to get their flowers number one. Even if you don't like them, even if you disagreed with them on certain topics, everybody that's been on this, they deserve to get credit. Because they've been getting ripped on. They say that this is all pseudo science, it breaks the laws of thermodynamics, and now it turns out there really is going to be free energy.

Then I think those people deserve a little bit of credit, personally. But anyway, I understand it. Appreciate you guys. But yeah, no guarantee it's going to be him. We'll see. I'm going to chat around and see if I can find some people.

Uh my pill chat, thank you very much woke societies for that huge raid. I'm going to try to raid somebody random. I appreciate it. Spazzle Yeti says you deserve major credit, more credit. Thank you very much, man. Appreciate that.

The only downside was wait, can I see if there's gold pills? Oh, yeah. Minnesota girl gifts the cookie. Minnesota girl, thank you very much. I'm a Minnesota boy, but we got wiped out. I voted Michelle Michelle DeFoer.

I think all my people lost, actually. Brutal chat. Don't listen to my investment advice and don't you know, and if you are on my side when it comes to voting, we're probably going to lose. Mhm. We get lucky every once in a while. YouTube, hope you You having a great night.

Nicole gives that super chat says, "Reading Brody's MH370 book about you." Yes, Michael Brody's. He opens with Picard's, "There are four lights." quote. And then Stewart dies. And then you post clips on Friday stream. The synchronicity is mind-blowing.

Yes, shout out to Michael Brody. You guys can check out his book. There was a little bit of uh we had a little bit of a I don't know if see misunderstanding about that. I'm not directly involved in the book, but I actually do think it's good. So, he made a little book that goes over the research. So, if you want to know more about the initial especially MH370 research from 2023, he's got QR codes that will bring you to images and diagrams. Um check out his book.

I'll I'll get a link for you. MH370 solved. Give him a shout out. And I think it's pretty cheap too if you're interested. Only oh, yeah. This one's only download version is only $5 or you can probably get a paperback version for a little bit more.

There you guys go. Check it out. Pretty interesting. And you know, I don't I I don't necessarily endorse every view that's in this. So, don't come back to me later and be like, "Oh, you said this and now this Look, everybody has their own beliefs, but I think he's probably got the closest most accurate understanding of what happened and most up-to-date out of anybody else out there right now. So, there you go.

Michael Brody, shout out to you, brother. Okay. Next chat. Sonia Sullivan with those super chats. What is this? A black solo cup?

I don't even Where did I even find this black solo cup? >> [laughter] >> I was like, "You know what? We shouldn't be giving people free advertisement." So, I found one black solo cup. They had some kind of event at my apartment here. By the way, story time. I found out more about that shooting incident.

Apparently, it was actually some kind of dispute and it wasn't like a mass shooter situation. They sent out an email saying they didn't get a lot of details, but that like somebody from outside the building was let in, there was a confrontation between the two of them, and then the person the resident shot the non-resident. Nobody died, but they got a shot. And I don't know the circumstances, but apparently they just mutually agreed to cancel the lease since that person just gone. Good news, still no followers of Ashton Forbes that have killed anybody. That's good.

Better than Hasan [ __ ] I think he's got several lots of blood on his hand. Okay, back to the topic at hand though. Black solo cup proceed to fill with physics, Pais plasma and fusion tonight. Toby Keith never saw this coming. Thank you, Sonia Sullivan. I appreciate you, you mamacitas.

Uh going to talk to Salvatore Pais again soon. Haven't scheduled it. I do have a couple of weeks off coming up, so I will probably be doing a little bit more streaming during those couple weeks off. Uh even though I am just going to be relaxing a little bit, taking a little bit of a vacation. Um I do want to make sure I'm getting you guys content and I just enjoy doing this, so more to come guys. Hope you enjoy.

Steven Fleischer says, "Can you find him and get him on a Hard Truths?" I'll be honest, I already tried to call him. So, I already found him. Shawn Nett is still alive. He is a professor somewhere. Won't say exactly where.

You guys can find it pretty easily. Uh do want to talk to him. It seems like he's changed directions. He still has been co-writing papers about plasma physics, but he's not into necessarily fusion, which I thought was interesting. So, yeah, I think there's a good chance we might be able to get him on the Hard Truths. We'll see though.

Whoa, another super chat. Geez, that was a big one. Thank you, Sonia Sullivan. Wait, they weren't asking if this nuclear they were calculating mass, thrust, break even, and vehicle integration 20 years ago. Exactly, what were they building? I mean, I think that it's easy to dismiss this stuff if you don't have the two videos, military videos of orbs teleporting a plane, you can be like, "Oh, they were just they were just guessing around.

They were just having fun." You can make up a million excuses for it. But after after you've actually seen it in action, and then you read the papers, you're like, "Oh, they weren't just guessing. They were getting ready to build this, and this was their public cover where you can release this science, it's publicly available. They just don't know they were actually going to build it." It seems pretty obvious and with the with hindsight, with in in retrospect.

So, thank you, Sonia Sullivan, for those two huge super chats. Appreciate you. And then lastly, Steven Fleischer says, "Where did the orbs go after the plane is zapped?" Now, this is a great question. I think the most plausible theory is they just go along with the plane, and then they just crash into the ocean on the other side. Why?

Because I imagine what's happening is that they're being neutralized, that that's a neutralization or reconnection process, and when the reconnection process is over, the energy has been spent, and now they dis- dissipate and collapse. It's also possible they come out on the other side, and they're flying around on the other side, too. Now, if we can get the truth about this out, the big question we should be getting is, "Where are the videos on the other side?" There's some videos of a plane appearing out of nowhere on the other side.

They guarantee they had a drone staring at the location where the plane is at to come out, and then a plane just appears out of nowhere. Now, the question is, do three orbs appear around with it, or does the plane just appear out of nowhere, and the orbs come crashing down, or do the orbs just not exist on the other side? Good question. So, I mean, there's still a lot more questions to be answered regarding this science and this physics, even finding out as much as we have. So, shout out to all of you guys. You are all the ones that made this possible.

Feels like we have a generational run upcoming here. Got some major major interviews dropping. Uh lots of uh media. So, go ahead and share it. Talk about it with your friends. Get it out there.

Start getting people comfortable with it, and we'll win in the end, guys. We're going to go with our favorite SIBIRs video tonight. Now, I want to give you guys a little background. This video is one of my favorites, but it's also the most incorrect of the videos that are out there. We found out that the satellite video is not actually satellite video at all, which means it's not SIBIRs video, which is a satellite surveillance system for nuclear weapons and missile launches. But, it might be connected to it.

The drone is communicating with a satellite. That satellite may be part of the broader SIBIRs network. I don't know. Either way, I just really like this song, chat. Have a great night. Love you guys.

Peace out. I'm Mistry 370X. We'll be back on Friday. Later. Did it end? >> [music] >> Infrared eyes, scanning the black, [music] tracking the heat, never turning back. Control 22, a covert gaze.

Control [music] 33 in the cosmic maze. Controls in the mix, secrets untold. Silent watchers, brave and bold. >> [music] >> In the shadows, they silently glide, protecting our interests far and wide. >> ASPIRES, [music] sentinel of the night, watching [music] over with infrared sight, alerting us to threats [music] afar, guiding our defenses like a guiding star. >> In the silence of [music] space, they keep their post. Shields unseen, yet feared the most. With precision and speed, they warn of danger, keeping us safe from the missile's anger.

ASPIRES, sentinel of the night, watching [music] over with infrared sight, alerting us to threats afar, guiding our defenses like a guiding [music] star. And it rolls in the mix, secrets untold, silent watchers, brave and bold. In the shadows, they silently glide, protecting our interests far and wide. >> ASPIRES, sentinel of >> [music] >> the night, watching over with infrared sight, alerting us to threats [music] afar, guiding our defenses like a guiding star. ASPIRES, sentinel of the night, watching over with [music] infrared sight, alerting us to threats afar, guiding our defenses like [music]