Disclosure Delayed

Video Transcript

Reject guy Malaysian 370 contact 12 decimal 9. Good night. >> Breaking news tonight. A Malaysia Airlines flight [music] with 239 people on board, including four Americans, has [music] gone missing. >> Even as these grainy satellite images released today by the Chinese government, >> again, the Malaysian flight was [music] a was one shot at China saying, "Knock it up. >> Why shoot it down, though? It's not hostile. Our [music] technologies permit us to manipulate time and space. >> They need [music] distance annihilated. This country is very powerful, >> far more powerful than people understand. We have weaponry that nobody has any idea what it is. And it is the most powerful weapons in [music] the world. Not even close. I remember the [music] line from Hindu scripture [music] is trying to persuade the prince that he should do his duty [music] and to impress him takes on his multi-armed form [music] and says now I am come to destroy of worlds. [music] I suppose we all thought that one way or another. We are back. We are back, chat. Welcome. Hope you had a great weekend. Welcome back to the show, guys. I'm your host, Ashen Forbes, as usual. Name's always up here, guys. Boy, do we have a lot to talk about tonight, guys. We have a lot of politics to talk about. I know that's your favorite topic, chat. I always write about everything. That's where you're at. That's where you'll find me. Before we dig into that though, before we talk about that, and we're also going to talk about UFO, eupfology as they call it, aliens, UFOs, flying saucers, Matt Brown on Jesse Michaels, and a new revelation, a new revelation that I've deduced. It may not be that huge, but you, I think, will enjoy it. Now, but before we get into all of that, most importantly, chat, where's my hat? The state fair. OMG, chat. BRB, chat. This is what I get for not being prepared. Oh, look at that chat. Oo. You may say, "What is that?" Uh, you don't have one of these hats. You may say, "Oh, is that a normal hat?" Uh, no. Uh, sorry. Only two people in the world have this hat. And the other one's name is Bruce Willis. Wow. Chat, this is called a cork hat. Yes, cork hat summer. Now, if you don't have a core hat, you're basically nobody. You basically don't matter in this world. That's I'm basically a trends setter. Uh they they call me an influencer. Kind of a big deal. So, anyway, state fair. Let's chat about it. Let's talk about it. I'll wear the hat while I'm talking about it, in fact. Got to go to the state fair. Minnesota has basically the best state fair in the world. It's huge. It has everything you could possibly want and it's not low class. A lot of state fairs you go to. Very low class, but no, very classy. Lots of good things to eat. Got some breakfast. I've always wanted to go and get breakfast before it gets really hot. Got to see the tractors. Have a a yearly pilgrimage to the tractors to the uh what do they call it? The humpyard or something. I don't know what they call it. Machinery Hill to see the tractors. Got to eat chicken on a stick. Chicken on a stick chat. Real real talk. I'm not big on the fried things, but I do like the chicken on the stick. One of my favorites. And what else do we get to see? And oh yes, the most important thing. Five different kinds of licorice. Five different kinds. Strawberry banana kind of licorice, cotton candy licorice. I did not get the funnel cake and I did not get the cheese curds. I should have got the cheese curds. Wasn't feeling it. Now, one thing I want to say about the state fair since we're going to be talking a little bit about politics here. I didn't see the animals, although I do love and respect animals and and especially there's a whole area just for cows and milk products. You get ice cream there, best milk there, etc. There's also a haunted house. Very scary for children. Highly recommend it. Oh, and we got the apple cider. Fresh apple cider. Can't beat it. Now, moving on towards the politics side of this. Still state fair related. [snorts] There were like four or five activities that were that had the longest lines I've ever seen. Some of them were warranted, other ones were not. I want to present it to you because I think it's interesting from the psychosocial sociological perspective. Why were there lines around the block for certain booths and no line at all for 90% of the stuff? 99% of the stuff. I thought that was very interesting. So maybe we can figure it out based on what the things are. Maybe, maybe not. The apple fries, fried apples with caramel sauce, had a line around the block right in front of the breakfast place that we were at. In fact, we should have gone right away because by the time we got out of breakfast, the line was so long. It would have been like an hour just to get some fried apples. But that's the one I definitely wanted to try. My dad wanted to go to what was it called? The seed art. Seed art. You heard me correctly. Seed. The word seed and art mixed together. And supposedly is exactly what it sounds like. art that people had put together with seeds. This was the point after about the third of these super long lines that I asked my dad, "Where did you hear?" Actually, I didn't ask him where he heard about. I said, "Dad, did you hear about these things, these booths on the internet, on the Facebook?" Yeah, I did. And then it all made sense, chat. We live in a world now dictated by to us by social media. The real world doesn't matter at all anymore. The reason why 90% of the booths have nobody at them is because there's no social media, Tik Tok videos telling people to go to those booths. Can you imagine there being an hour-ong line for seed art? There's no way in my mind you could possibly ever convince me that anybody is ever waiting willfully in line for seed art. And there's an hourong line. I'm staring at it. Staring at the boomers doing it. Oh man, Lulu, are you going to have a problem during stream here, girl? Um, so I will point out the other things that had super long lines. Number one was the uh mung m uh hot dogs or what? Mung corn dogs. Mung corn dogs. Yes, you heard me. The mung corn dog line was so long that there was no possible chance that we could even think about it. The pickup line was as long as you would imagine a an order line to be. And then the other last one, which you might appreciate, our last state fair story, was a super long line outside the arts and crafts. My dad said, "What is this line for in the middle of nowhere?" And so I decided to go check it out. I start walking down the line and what do I see? Sure enough, at the end of the line, donuts. plain ordinary donuts being freshly made with glaze on them. Basically like crispy creams. Donuts. That was it. They were waiting in the longest line I had ever seen just to get a donut. And I knew right away that there clearly someone had made a Tik Tok video about it. And that's the reason why. So anyway, interesting stuff. And it's interesting to see the behaviors change after 20 years of going 30, 40 years of going to the state fair where you can clearly see the influence of social media. And I even saw when I was picking up my chicken on a stick, the girl's talking to the person, the other girl behind the counter and she's going, "Oh, did you watch the Tik Tok video where the guy tries out everything?" He's like, "It was so great." She goes, "I did see that one on Tik Tok with the guy with the bald head." And I'm like, "Holy chat. This is exactly what's going on." Okay, now you may say, "Ashen, why are we talking about this?" Well, just cuz I wanted to. Number one. But number two, because it explains kind of everything that's wrong with our society right now. Nobody believes in objective truth anymore. And honestly, partially, we might be to blame. I'm promoting that we have teleportation and free energy capability. It kind of makes people not trust the government anymore. Kind of puts things into perspective for us. Quickly, I want to point out, and we're not going to dig too much into this. I could, but the Tyler Robinson Candace Owens situation is a good example of this. People are adamantly convinced that there's a cover up going on, but they can't explain a single person involved in the cover up. They just know there's a cover up going on. They don't know who's involved. They can't give you one name, but they know there's a cover up going on. And the problem with it is they start to fabricate fake evidence. This is something we saw in the MH370 videos, too, where debunkers are fabricating fake evidence to pro they want the videos to be fake so badly that they were fabricating fake evidence, fake debunks to try to prove the videos wrong. It goes to show that these issues are psychological more than anything else. When reality conflicts with people's beliefs, they will do whatever is required to reconcile the two, including fabricating fake evidence to make their fake story make sense. Now, in this particular case, what happened was Candace Owens and friends, we'll say, made up a fake receipt, adamantly claimed Tyler Robinson was at some steakhouse problem. And the thing about this particular fake story is they went all in on it. Candace Owens repeated that she had confirmed it, that she had confirmed with the restaurant owner that she had seen the unblurred receipt that proves it's Tyler Robinson was there. And this was important because it helps set the timeline and refute the Fed slop. Prove that the Fed slop story doesn't make any sense. Well, here's the problem. Andrew Wilson. Somebody just called the restaurant owner like a normal human being and the restaurant owner just denied it. No, nobody ever confirmed the receipt. That never happened. No one was able to confirm that Tyler Robinson was ever even there. There's actually no reason to believe he was ever even there. And the reason why this is important is Candace Owens repeated over and over, "You can save this post." She said, "You can save this post." Well, we did. We saved the posts. You were lying. And the problem too then is that they not they don't even own up to it. They get caught dead on dead to rights lying. Was she going to is she going to admit it? Of course not. Of course she's not going to admit it. That would break trust. That would break the fake credibility that she's built up with her fan base. We've lived in a we are living in a time now where feelings are more important than facts are. Evidence doesn't matter. You have videos of a plane disappearing. Doesn't matter. What matters is my podcast or my streamer told me that this is true and I'm going to believe them regardless of evidence, logic, reason, or anything else. So, I'm not going to harp too much on it because I think truthfully I also am not pleased with the counter Candace Owens grift either. The only way you can deal with people like this is you have to stop giving them attention as much as you can while still refuting the fake things they come up with. But at the same time, I don't like that people are building a whole industry about debunking Candace Owens either, which is why I don't spend very much time trying to do it. That's not what I'm trying to make myself about it. You should focus on your own content. But let's move on to the next topic because this chat, I think we found a new one. I think we found a new one that is going to bother you guys more than the jetpacks more than daylight savings time. Let's talk momentarily about flock cameras. Chat, I don't think you're going to like me on this one. [clears throat and cough] I've avoided the flock camera talk for a long time, for several weeks now because a I don't care. But this is relevant. So let's start with what is a flock camera. Okay, I had to ask because I don't think anyone even understands what a flock camera is. It's just become this boogeyman in people's minds that are flock camera bad. Okay, a flock camera is a camera that the city has set up in a public location connected to a solar panel so that it can be powered and they can run remotely. The point of these cameras is so they can surveil things that are going on in areas of interest. Usually when I've seen these flock cameras deployed, it's because they're trying to put them in a spot where there's high levels of crime, where there's kids that are trying to do honestly, they did it when we were trying to play Pokemon Go. Nobody gave a when we they were we were playing Pokemon Go and they put up these flock cameras to like track everybody. They never arrested anybody, but they put the cameras up because they're trying to see if anybody's going to commit a crime, they want to have evidence for you. Okay. I'm totally fine with people being against flop cameras for whatever reason you want to be against them for. And I'm not even necessarily for cameras. I'm just for the truth in reality. So, I want to get us all on the same page. That's what a flop camera is. Okay. [snorts] I want to help because it seems like this flop camera thing is starting to go off the rails. It's starting to become like a Black Lives Matter situation where it's not even really about the topic anymore. It becomes about showing how much you are for or against the thing and virtue signaling harder than the next person. And that's the seem seems to be where we're going with the flock cameras. It's not really about flot what flot cameras do anymore. It's just about you have to show that you hate flot cameras more than the next guy did. So, I want to point out to help you guys why this particular post right here makes no sense whatsoever. Post by John Borshide. Whatever I say has a stupid name. Flock CEO Garrett Langley thinks you don't deserve the right to privacy. He also has opted to blur his house in Google Maps because he thinks he deserves the right to privacy. Remember this double standard. There's no double standard here. Okay? A lot of people don't seem to understand the difference between public and private property. When you are in the public, there is no expectation of privacy. What does this mean? That means when you're walking around in the public, people can record you without your permission. They can record you without your permission. They can listen to you without your permission, too. So, when you're in the public, you should be cognizant of what you're doing and what you're saying at all times. There is no expectation of privacy in the public. This is not complicated. It's not even controversial. There is actually no controversy about this whatsoever. The government has every single right in the world to record you while you're in the public anywhere they want. You may not like it, but it is what it is. They are allowed to legally do that. They are not legally allowed to record you in your house. They're not legally allowed to record you in your backyard. Nowhere where you have private property are they allowed to legally record you. So this post doesn't make any sense. The person not wanting their private property recorded is not in any way a double standard for allowing cameras to be out in the open in the public. And the reason why I think this is interesting is because I've brought this issue up before. And my solution was actually the opposite. Don't bring down the public cameras. Make the public cameras available to everybody. Instead of trying to win a battle we can't win, which is chopping down flock cameras and then they just bring them back up again. Instead, let the public have access to that database. It's public land. There's no expectation of privacy. We should be allowed to see the video footage. Why can't we look at that video footage, too? In fact, that seems to be the best solution because then there's full transparency. Now we can see everything they're seeing and to the point that will bring up and we'll say, "Well, what if it can see into my house?" Well, then you have to move the camera. It's not that complicated. If the camera can see into your house, into your backyard, it needs to be moved. Simple as that. The line is very clear. Now, I think there's a better take. I'll help you guys out because this really isn't controversial. The more controversial thing is what they can do with AI, track you with AI. And my counter-argument to be, you've already been getting tracked, guys. You've been getting tracked everywhere you go for probably the last 10 years, maybe longer. For as long as you've held your cell phone in your pocket, which for most of you is probably longer than 10 years, this thing has been tracking you everywhere you go. It's got a GPS built right in there. In fact, Google knows where your home is when you don't even have to put your home into the system. And you guys are telling me you're afraid about what exactly are you afraid about? If you're walking around with a cell phone in your pocket, tracking you everywhere you go, and you're trying to tell me you're afraid of flock cameras, you're not really making any sense, man. They're already tracking you, which is fine, but like I said, you can be against them or for them. I don't care. But you should be consistent because when you just say, "Oh, I hate flop cameras. I my privacies." But then you're walking around with a tracking device everywhere you go. It's kind of like you don't really care about privacy. You're just kind of ignorant. you don't really know what's happening technologically. So the thing that I people are probably concerned about if I'm playing devil's advocate against my own position is they're concerned about the AI tracking about putting all this information into a database Gorgon stair database where we have all this video footage and then letting the AI figure out everywhere you've ever gone. And that's a legitimate concern. We know that's possible. We've seen we've seen the Gorgon stair footage. We've seen them trying to integrate AI into it. That's a very legitimate concern. But let me play let me flip that around. What if we need this level of tracking? How are we going to deploy 0 energy? How are we going to deploy free energy? How are we going to deploy warp drives without tracking capability in public? Tracking capability in public is the bare minimum we need to be able to deploy this technology and feel safe. I mean, you tell me, are you going to feel safe knowing some random guy has access to a bomb that can blow up the whole planet? No. Of course you're not. Of course you're not going to feel safe. So, it's going to be tough. We are going to have to probably give up some civil liberties as this technology starts to become public. Now, here's the good news, guys. Ignorance is bliss. We're currently eating the steak. Everybody's ignorant on this planet right now. Nobody knows what we can really do. And the good news is, just like the live stream is called, disclosure is going to be delayed. seems like they have no intention of telling us the truth about this technology anytime soon. So, let's keep it rolling because I want to get to some of the good stuff. We got one more here. We're going to watch a streamer that I've never seen before. DOA Cats. I don't know what that means. I thought this data center thing was going to go away, but it's actually got 10 times stupider. It's actually I've actually been trying to mock it as hard as I can, and I actually can't mock it hard enough. The left has completely latched on to this idea that data centers are bad. They absolutely believe that the computers are using up the waters, but not just using up the waters, using up the good waters. which is the craziest you've ever heard considering it's a computer and if you splash water on it it's going to get destroyed but in their minds they've developed some idea I think that we're like I don't know we're boiling the water or something and then we're using it to cool the computers it's not really clear what they think exactly what concerns me is this we've got people that look and dress like this. I mean, what I mean, what is going on here? What in the hell is going on here right now, chat? We got people that looked and dressed like this and they're getting their opinions from people that look and dress like that on the right. People that think that the computers are using up the good waters. And I'm kind I'm fine with it, but we have to realize we're going to live in a two-tiered society. People like this are not going to be allowed to have 0 point energy, free energy, microchips or anything because it's like you can't give somebody who's got special needs a weapon, right? They're just going to hurt themselves with it. You have to give them a helmet so they can't harm themselves. We're basically going to have to give these people helmets, like zero point energy helmets, basically. Hold on. Let's watch the clip. Let's see. This is actually gonna be painful. I don't know if I've even watched this. Prepare yourselves, chat. Trigger warning. If your IQ is above room temperature, this might be very painful. >> The the one-sided relationship I have with Charlie, and I really don't want to make it a whole a whole thing in real life. chat. What is going on in this person's room? At least this better be like a 14y old. This better be a 14year-old. Is that like fake cake on the on the table and weird pink Pokemon everywhere? Okay, this better be if this I find out this is like a 30-year-old or something, I'm going to lose my crap. Chat >> life. He's so cool. >> He's so cool. She's talking about that guy. Look at those fingernails. Do women wear this? Where's uh Chaotic Good? Chaotic Good, if you're in the chat, I need to know. Do women actually wear fingernails that are like three inches long? >> He's really, really smart. I really like that guy a lot. I like how it is now. I want to keep it this way. So, I I'm just going to keep watching his videos every single day instead of being like, "Oh, I know that guy, so it feels weird to watch him while I go to sleep." Like, he literally talks me to sleep. Like that man will talk me through my makeup. Like I'll be doing my makeup and I'll just play Charlie videos back to back. I'll do game I'll watch him I've watched him play play so many games start to finish. So many. There's so many games that I don't even want to play on stream because I've watch. So that's the only downside to to Charlie's existence for me personally is that [laughter] he's playing everything that I feel like >> she didn't bring up the water thing. I didn't even know the context wasn't there. I just lost my craft when I realized that she was supporting the guy that thinks that the the data centers are using up the waters. I guess the point is this. You wonder how do all this how does this mind virus spread? I remember I used to ask my brother where he gets his information and he was like, "Oh, I I get it from multiple sources." I'm like, "No, you get it from Reddit. You're getting it from Reddit." Right? And this is this is the equivalent of getting it from Reddit. You're not getting your information. You're not coming to your own opinions on anything. I just watch my streamer whatever they say. Hopefully, if you guys watch me, you don't just regurgitate what I say. And I know you don't. I know you don't because I listen to you guys and you're extremely knowledgeable. Look at Gabriel Diaz, one of the smartest young men I've ever talked to. And he's not just regurgitating what I'm saying. In my interview with him, he says, "You asked such a good question about, you know, uh, what's, you know, what's keeping the atom stable?" He's like, "Those are questions that I have and I wonder about." It's like that's the difference between influencing people and telling people what to think. Okay, let's move on from the data center. Well, actually, one more thought on the data center stuff. It doesn't actually matter if the data center stuff is propaganda from China or if it's just stupid people being stupid. What matters is we can't let this win. Being against data centers is fundamentally the same as being against computers, being against progress. And some people would say, why do we need the data centers? We don't. Why do we need technological advancement? We don't need it, but progress keeps moving forward anyway. Things are constantly advancing. That's how the world works. And it's not going to stop. The best argument is like this is like being against electricity, being against infrastructure. Of course, we're not against those things. And the worst part is the people that are saying they're against these things have never been against these things. And they're not in any other scenario. Every single company in the world uses data centers today. every single one from their website all the way down to their their databases, their their product ordering, uh shipping, everything. Every single thing uses data centers. All the video games you guys play, every single video game is online only now. They're all data centers. Everything is data centers. They've added this AI prefix to it and convinced people that this is a separate thing. The AI data centers are bad. We're just talking about computers at the end of the day. And as somebody has said, do they even use water to cool down the data centers? No. Very little water is actually used. This idea that they're evaporating the water and then the water is gone is ludicrous. First of all, there's actually no facts to go along with this. Second of all, water doesn't get used up when it evaporates. So even in the hypothetical scenario in which you're telling the truth, which you're not, that still doesn't make any sense. The water's not going anywhere. And even if that was a situation, even if somehow that was still wrong, there are other ways to cool things that don't require the use of water. In fact, I've been to one of the largest data centers called Switch Communications. You can Google it. I've been in the one in Nevada in Las Vegas. They have their own proprietary cooling systems. For example, I think this one, and I'm just guessing this is really a long time ago, the idea was really about the airflow, having the things elevated so that the air flow could blow up and then it could be really super efficient in terms of how they manage the cooling process. The idea that there's water flowing through all of them, I mean, it depends on how you engineer it. And the last part about the cooling aspect of the computers is this is the if you understand zero point energy which hopefully you guys all do at this point then this should be the dumbest issue ever for you. This is the basically like being against being for climate change while you understand zero point energy. Why don't I care about climate change guys? It's not because I don't believe it's possible we're impacting the climate. Of course it's possible. I don't care about climate change because we have unlocked unlimited green energy already and we're just hiding it. So why is the cooling process stupid? A because I'm saying we have access to free unlimited energy and B because when we pull 0 point energy out, we get cooling along with it. There's three things actually that come with pulling energy out of the out of the vacuum. Number one, you get electricity, obviously energy. Number two, you get propulsion. And number three, you get cooling. So when we start turning on these zero point energy generators, the byproduct is we're going to get cooling in much the same way right now. We get heat as a byproduct. So, we're actually going to have need places to balance off that cooling. We're going to say, "Hey, anyone needs some free refrigeration." But here's the best part. We're not even going to need that because the data centers are going to be the energy generators themselves. They're going to suddenly become thermodynamically stable, not excess heat anymore. So, there you guys go. There's your science education for the day. Now, since you've listened to the professor, you understand more about why data centers are not bad. Data centers are actually good, chat, why flock cameras might be bad. Kind of depends on your perspective, but they're not invading your privacy. And hopefully you understand why the state fair is awesome. CCAT summer chat. Okay, let's get into the fun stuff. We finally got rid of the boring stuff. If you're still with me, it's about to pay off. New MH370 video. Are you ready right now, chat? I just explained why flot cameras don't invade your privacy. They don't invade your privacy because there's no expectation of privacy in the public. Just keep saying that till it sinks in. I know. I know it's hard. This is like trying to convince people that Iron Man jetpacks aren't real. I know you believe they really are. I get it. They're not real, though. Just it is what it is. You can see the flock camera thing, chat. It's going to be a problem. Okay, but real talk. New MH370 video and we get featured. Okay. You know, my ego won't let me go without reviewing a video in which we get featured. Okay, now is the time to test your knowledge. What parts of this video do they get it correct? And what parts of the video do they get wrong? Here you are with the world's leading expert on MH370, the Ashton Forbes. You know, if you get anything wrong in your video about the videos or about what happened on the plane, you're going to get picked apart. Here we go. It would raise legitimate new questions about the crash location. And then there's the theory we need to revisit. In May and June of stretches credibility past its breaking point, but and this is the pattern, it persists because governments haven't released the data that would end it. The SOS hydrophone recordings from March 2014 have never been made public. If the US released that data and it showed no impact in the southern Indian Ocean, it would raise legitimate new questions about the crash location. And then there's the theory we need to revisit. In May and June of 2014, barely 2 months after MH370 disappeared, an anonymous YouTube user going by Reicside Anon uploaded two short clips. The >> Let's go chat. They're talking about the videos. Look, you can say what you want about me. Call me a grifter. Call me whatever you want. All bounces off me. I don't care. But I was successful. I repeated over and over and over again. Yes. LFG. BTW LFG. I repeated over and over. What's my goal? My goal is to get these videos into the zeitgeist so that when anybody brings up the missing plane, they have to bring up these videos. Why? Because these videos are real. And the more people talk about them, the quicker that will come out. This is not going to be a quick process. I mean, we're trying to tell we're trying to convince people that we teleported a plane in a covert operation. Not exactly. Not exactly a real easy thing to to believe. Okay, here we go. First appeared to show a passenger aircraft filmed from a military drone. A gray grainy feed with a headsup display overlay. The So, this is not a headsup display overlay. I don't think maybe I'm wrong. This not gray and grainy either. So, I think he got the c I think he got the videos flipped around, which most people do. Not a big deal. Whatever. >> Second appeared to be thermal satellite imagery. This is not People are still saying it's satellite imagery, which is I'm not going to harp on them too badly for this, but it goes to show this video is only six days old. They didn't either. There's only one of two things happening here. Number one, they're not even using AI to ask what my opinion is about what this video is because it should have said it's Gorgon stair wide area motion imagery. Or alternatively, the AI is just not picking up my content. I thought with 500 live streams, a hundred podcast interviews, thousands of posts on social media, I would have thought the AI would pick this up and and pull in the correct answer. It's Gorgon stair wide area motion imagery, but weirdly doesn't. So, >> top-down infrared view of the same aircraft. In both videos, three glowing spherical objects appear, orbit the plane in a coordinated pattern, and then there's a sudden flash. The plane and the orbs vanish simultaneously. For 9 years, almost nobody watched these. They had a few thousand. I >> I want to sidetrack on this. We'll come back to this video in a second. I I actually do believe the AI is actively, and I say actively, avoiding my content. There is no reason whatsoever the AI shouldn't be sourcing me related to this plane. None at all. There's no argument anybody can make. By every single objective metric, every single metric, I should be getting crawled by the AI, whatever you want to call it. And even now, you can go to Grock and it will literally intentionally ignore everything that I've ever said and it will post to you information that is contraindicated by things that I have shown and proven and claimed and just doesn't look at it. One thing, and the reason why I think this is the reason why I think there's credibility to this argument, the very moment AI became capable of figuring out anti-gravity, figuring out free energy, that was the moment the government stepped IN AND SAID, "WHOA, WE GOT TO PUT some guard rails on this AI thing." Did you notice that? And did you notice that Annie now suddenly she's not she can't source outside papers anymore? You can ask her. I'll say, "Annie, can you go find all the papers about this or that?" She says, "My database doesn't have the capability to access that reliably." Like, what? That is somebody coding into the system telling it to to start putting in walls to stop accessing data. That's actually crazy. And it goes to show that the real value in AI is not going to be who has the best algorithm. That's actually not going to be it. That is certainly going to be a factor. It's going to be who has the best sources. Whose AI has access to the best information versus which one has guarded itself from the harmful misinformation. Quite interesting. And it would make sense because they need to protect this information, protect this technology. They have to control the AI. They have to views total. Most people who stumbled across them assumed they were an obvious CGI exercise and moved on. Then in 2023, a Netflix documentary brought MH370 back into the mainstream conversation. And these two old clips resurfaced on Reddit and Twitter. Within weeks, they had millions of views. And Ashton Forbes, a self-described independent researcher who'd been investigating the videos, became their >> This guy. Look at that guy. He looks kind of like me, chat. Is that a clone? How do we know if that's a clone, chat? How do I know if I'm a clone? I could be a clone. We're not bothered the skits. I could be a clone and I might not even know it. They might have put memories into me to make me think that I'm not a clone. That could have been an older version of me, the real Ashton. He might be trapped in Diego Garcia right now. He needs your help, Chad. most visible advocate, building a large following on X and YouTube around the claim that these clips showed authentic US military footage of MH370 being teleported using classified advanced technology. Forbes's theory in full goes like this. The three orbs are not extraterrestrial. >> Okay, you know what? You get a gold star. random AI video. He honestly, this is this is like the lowest bar possible, but most people don't even get over this bar. Ashton does not believe the orbs are advanced aliens floating around in the sky. It's incredible how many people can't even get over that bar. Jeff Wise couldn't get over that bar. Ross Kohhart couldn't get over that bar. They literally couldn't even get over the lowest bar, which is that Ashton doesn't believe these orbs flying around are aliens. Okay. Yes. They're man-made anti-gravity craft deployed by the US military or associated defense contractors. >> Thank you. And CIA. We could have thrown CIA in there, too, but sure. Sure. Close enough. Possibly linked to programs at Loheed Martin's Skunk Works or the Defense Intelligence Agency, the technology involves autonic fusion, 0 point energy extraction, and magneto hydrodnamic propulsion. >> Honestly, if you guys tell me an AI wrote this, I would tell you, you know what? Probably this proves that AI is are more sentient than humans are. If if an AI wrote this, the most of the human videos about MH370 won't even talk about the MH370 videos and when they do talk about them, they get everything wrong. This, if this is an AI, it gets more right than the humans do. This is basically proof that the AI is more sentient than humans. Essentially creating a localized wormhole that removes the aircraft from normal spaceime. Bingo. You got it. 0 point energy wormhole. I mean, the plane's gone. People are like, "How do you know it's not annihilation?" Uh, cuz E= MC². You can't just zap a plane away and have it just be annihilated into nothing. You can't destroy matter. Has to go somewhere. So, it has to be a wormhole. Forbes connects this to the 20 free-scale semiconductor employees on board suggesting the operation was motivated by control over advanced microchip technology. He point now this is the hardest part the advanced microchip technology. Yes. And I was just talking to someone recently and I was reiterating this. Look, I don't care what the reason is, man. Why do you why are you coming to me for what the reason is for why we did this? Do I look like somebody that ran the operation? Do I look like a spook? I mean, maybe I do. I don't know. But I'm not a spook. I don't know how CIA operatives come up with psychotic operations with orbs involved in them or why they do them or what the protocol is, but I'm going to go ahead and guess it's related to the 20 engineers on board. Look, I'm just a healthcare IT guy, but when there's 20 engineers on board one plane connected to a American defense contractor producing advanced microchips for the for the military doesn't seem that far-fetched that maybe they might be the target points to recent US government disclosures about unidentified aerial phenomena as evidence that this kind of technology exists within classified programs. That's the theory. Now, let's look at what actually supports it and what doesn't. The case for authenticity was on the surface more detailed than most people expected. The satellite video referenced USA 229, which is a real classified National Reconnaissance Office satellite. Wait, this is all wrong. They even they confused me here actually with this. So the problem was that I went all in on the Gorgon Stabian USA 229 because we actually mapped every single satellite and those are the only satellites that were there and there was two satellites right next to each other right next to each other. Perfect for stereoscopic video. So you can't really blame me. And FYI, we do have crazy satellite surveillance. We do actually. We still don't even know what it is, but we have it. We have it. So, not exactly correct. And if you're going to bring up this looks like they're trying to bring up the satellite photos, the Chinese satellite photos. If you're going to bring these up, you should bring up that I connected them to the videos. Plus, these aren't even the good photos. These are these actually aren't even the Chinese satellite photos. These are different debris. So, I don't even know what they're they're doing here. >> The coordinates displayed in the footage roughly corresponded to MH370's >> Oh, I should send this to that guy. Somebody was asking >> satellite video referenced USA 229, which is a real classified National Reconnaissance Office satellite. The coordinates displayed in the footage roughly corresp I mean, this right here, look, man. If you want to be convinced that that the videos are real, just look at what you're seeing on the screen right here. I'll make it big for you. Look at this. This is the actual flight path. You can see where they put the fire and made the plane turn around. You can see where the radar plot was lost, where the plane is currently, right up here. And then you can see Katherine T's boat right there. And the coordinates are right there of the videos. The coordinates are right here. Coordinates are right here. It's a straight shot. This is like getting a video of the murderer walking past the crime scene and you being like, "No, that's probably unrelated." Like, what the hell? bonded to MH370's projected position over the Anderman Sea at the time military radar lost contact. The thermal characteristics in the infrared video, the heat signatures, the contrast patterns appeared broadly consistent with what military wide area motion imagery systems like the Gorgon stare would produce. And people with military backgrounds pointed out that accurately faking sensor overlays, frame rates, and thermal imaging artifacts from classified systems would require very specific insider knowledge that your average VFX hobbyist wouldn't have. And then, >> dude, just think about what you just said right there. It's actually impossible for anyone to have faked the videos. I can say 100%. The videos are 100% real. Actually impossible. There's no human being on the face of this earth with the skill sets required to fake those videos. There's no possible way I can convince people. I already know that. So, I'm just giving you a few points that will help you to understand why that is. You have to be a VFX artist and know about military capabilities that no one knew about at the time. I'm the guy that's exposing what those videos are, what they represent, and what types of surveillance systems they are. There's nobody else doing that. Nobody else that knew about those systems, let alone 12 years ago. But here's the other big point for you. How many impressions, how many views? That guy said people were getting millions of views the very first week the videos came out. Millions of views. That's not why I got involved in this. But obviously I've eclipsed that. I get roughly 500 million views per year. Roughly 500 million just on my Twitter account. Something like that. Let's just let's let's cut it in half. Let's say it's 250 million views. Where is the person that faked the videos? Don't you think the person that faked these videos would come out and say, "Hey, you're stealing my views. You've stolen my content that I made. You're making money off my content." I get copyright stried for having a random Hans Zimmer song or a Dane Cook joke. I get copyright strike for 10 seconds of using someone's random song that I've never heard of. But nobody is copyright striking me on the videos. Nobody's even contacting me about them. Nobody wants credit for their work. Nobody made the videos, bros. >> There's the physical evidence. Forbes sees it differently, and millions agree with him. They argue the debris locations don't match the official crash zone, that the drift timings don't add up, and that the theory relies on concepts like traversible wormholes and zero point energy. Ideas that exist in theoretical physics, but have never been demonstrated by anyone anywhere. So, the ideas exist in theoretical physics. The search zone makes no sense considering where the debris was found. And the theory that I've put forth, that we've put forth, fits with where the debris showed up. What more do you want? Seems pretty self-explanatory. The physics is theoretically real, but nobody's proven it yet. Doesn't that seem like a pretty good candidate for breakthrough physics, for hidden technology, suppression of technology? Yeah, the physics is real, just nobody's proved it yet. Hm. I wonder if that's where the government's hiding the secret technologies. I'm doing my best to try to get people to come to their own conclusions for how this is real. on December 30th, 2025. >> I think that's the end of the clip actually. Then it goes into some other stuff, but we don't have time for that. So, you can check this out. I'll get a link to it, even though this might be just an AI video. Here you guys go if you want to watch the rest. I'm going to probably clip that part from that's about us later tonight. Okay, next thing. chat. Matt Brown. I got to get the link. Matt Brown on Jesse Michaels. You probably wondered, is Ashton gonna talk about it? The Jesse Michaels Matt Brown. Matt Brown had me blocked for the longest time. Jesse Michaels. not sure what his situation is exactly. So, let's I let me give you the high level of what this interview was all about. I didn't watch it all. Can't stand all this pretentious crap and I can't stand talking about psychic powers and all this other stuff for too long. I can take it in small doses. So, I had the AI summarize it for us. So, [clears throat] oh boy, so many things here. Immaculate constellation. Brown says that around 2018, he opened a PowerPoint that had capabilities for an operational special access program called Immaculate Constellation. I'm going to go to this full screen. The Immaculate Constellation Program was supposedly a global UFO intelligence surveillance and reconnaissance effort that fused task collection and incidental sensor data from satellites, aircraft, ocean systems, and other domains to produce an operational picture of UFO activity. That actually is the most detailed explanation I've heard of immaculate constellation. And it makes sense. We have a linked network of surveillance systems feeding one giant computer and that computer system is mapping all the anomalous activity looking for gravitational manipulation by us, by our adversaries, by anybody. I We should have that if we don't. So, I'm glad we do have that. He reported the apparent special access spill through channels. He was told he did not need to be read in and the f the file was later deleted. So, here's the thing. Matt Brown doesn't have any inside information. Well, he has some inside information, but he's not part of the program. He was not read in. and he was not need to know. Now I'm almost 100% sure that we have found a secret that the UFO people don't know about. Matt Brown is not being malicious. Dylan Borland is not being malicious. He's just being ignorant. They actually think the United States government doesn't have these programs. They think we don't have teleportation. They think we don't have free energy. Or maybe they do, but they don't realize we've developed that technology and we're using it and we've successfully hidden it. And yes, we successfully hid it from them, too. The hubris you're about to hear from Matt Brown really goes to show that these guys clearly were brought in in the intelligence community. Had relatively mid-level access, highle access from the perspective of the public. Mid-level access from the perspective of being inside the intelligence community. They didn't have a need to know. They saw something that they knew was not normal. They saw something they said, "That's not normal propulsion. That's not a rocket." They saw some form of electric propulsion, probably fusion propulsion, and they freaked out. They freaked out and they were like, "This is there's something there's something sketchy going on here." And they're right. There is. There is. And this is why we have so much overlap. This is why we have so much overlap because they know I'm right about the physics. They know we're right about the physics. This is why they're so afraid of us, afraid of this community. They know we're right about the physics and they're terrified that we're going to steal that narrative from them. that if we know about the physics, people are going to come to us instead of going to them for the [clears throat] truth. This is what they're terrified of and this is why they're on their little blocking spree. Some of them may legitimately think that I'm spreading disinformation. Other of them are just stupid and they don't realize they're being used. Okay, highlight just a couple other things. agreements with nonhuman intelligence. This is the thing I thought I found the most interesting. Brown describes an oral tradition inside the legacy program of agreements stuck between the United States and third parties possessing the technology dating all the way back to Truman and Eisenhower. the US government would stay away from certain territories and the other party would have access to and communication with specific humans of its choosing. So this is where they're trying to imply that it's aliens. But the thing that I thought was more interesting is that a lot of this how do they keep this hidden? They don't write it down. The scientific papers are written down but that's it. The general broad theories are written down. That's how we know about 0 point energy. That's how we know about the ground state of the hydrogen atom. The actual engineering applications, they don't write it down. If they have it written down, it's in classified servers in the defense contractors and they're probably the most heavily guarded, like guys with guns guarding computers, that kind of thing. But we know they did it orally. They hand chat. They did it orally with their mouths. That's what she said. But for real, this is how they hit it. And we know because this is what happened with Fogbank. The secret nuclear material used in fusion bombs. The fog bank. We lost the recipe. We lost that technology. We had to reverse engineer our own technology because we lost the recipe because they didn't write it down. So, this tells us exactly the levels of security they'll go to when it comes to nuclear weapons and above. They simply don't write it down. You rely on the information being only in people's heads and then passing down the information verbally. And do you want to know what else this connects to? Get ready. Yi time. Bob Lazar. What did I say? My theory was on Bob Lazar. They were training him. Bob Lazar didn't come away with any documents. In fact, he never describes any reading any secret documents that tell how any of this stuff works. He was under the impression that he was trying to reverse engineer it. But he never describes reverse engineering anything. They were training him because that's how you bring people on. Word of mouth. You bring people to some sketchy site. You show them some crazy and then you judge if they're going to freak out or not. And you judge if you can trust them or not. And Bob Lazar didn't didn't pass the bar. He was not orb worthy. He was not worthy as they say in the Green Lanterns chat. And no, I don't watch that show. I don't watch anything DC related. Okay, I've ranted enough. Let's Let's do this thing here. Okay, Matt Brown, it's time for you to impress us. As always, chat. Shout out to the Jesse Michaels. His channel's getting huge. Check out Jesse Michaels. Here we go. How come I can't hear anything? >> Their own detection systems. Some of them are nuclear powers. Yeah. There has to be collaboration through NATO. >> You've said that you think science is managed. >> Mhm. >> And scientific innovation doesn't occur in maybe as organic a way as what people sort of think. What exactly do you mean? >> Yeah. uh specifically I don't know about like the development of it. I mean well you can think through it and and realize that you know some discoveries probably have their origin less in original thinking and more of study of recovered um technology or or some sort of you know uh reason to believe something is possible. Right? Once you know something's possible, you can align yourself towards achieving it much easier than searching in the unknown. But what I'm getting at more specifically is is actual uh domains of knowledge that are suppressed intentionally and are done that suppression occurs durationally um both from like a you know a funding standpoint to a brain drain kind of component to actual injection of uh disinformation or act. So right there [cough and clears throat] this guy's actually in the no. So I don't remember when he says this. this I think it's later on and we're going to hear him say this, but his actual position was that he was aware of technology and how we were applying technology. This is why Matt Brown had his breakdown, his red pill. And you listen to this and he says, wait, I forgot. I already forgot what he says here. [laughter] Oh yeah. Is it managed? How is it managed? It's managed from brain drain. It's managed through disinformation suppression. Think about it. How come we're listening to the Eric Weinstein tell us about observers and times travel? I can't chat. I can't get over the times travel thing, bro. Like, you're honestly telling on yourself. You're telling on yourself. You're telling the the world that you're low IQ when you come out and you go, "We can't call it time travel. We need to call it times travel." The reason why we get Avi Loe and Eric Weinstein as our public academics and not people that are like actually inspirational or intelligent is because all the smart people get sucked into the system. All the smart engineers get sucked into the system. There's a brain drain that happens. You get sucked into this system and now there's a void in the public. All the people that are smart enough to figure out zero point energy, anti-gravity, they're pulled in. Like, why did they put Avi Lobe on the top in the front of the UFO council? I told you guys before, and I'm 100% sure now, the reason why they made Avi Loe the head of the UFO council is they know he'll never get anything done. The whole point of this UFO disclosure thing they're doing is just to distract us. And not even distract, to just delay. They're trying to delay as long as possible. That's why there's five different releases already. They could have just done this all in one go. None of those videos are old or are are new. All those videos were released from like 2022 or older. They're dripping it out. They're just trying to delay the inevitable as long as possible, which is try to not let this technology spill out. Okay, let's let him keep going. Taken against independent researchers and I have very high confidence that that occurs in at least a few areas. So do you think there's a like a history of scientific suppression where when certain you know unlocks occur say in energy or propulsion that's sort of widely monitored and if that's at all a threat to kind of cartel interests whose power is based on scarcity they sort of intervene or what what exactly >> I think that probably happened more in the past but because sort of science has become so integrated with the state you know you can kind of you don't have to use such blunt tools as that now you can you know, align incentives based on where you where you give grants and funding. Um, and then you have this. >> So, what he's saying, it's even easier than what we anticipated. Like, we don't even have to kill people anymore. You can just align funding because the government controls pretty much all the funding. So, you can just control the direction of science. And they have been controlling the direction of science. That's why physics is so cooked right now. Like, you look at the state of physics right now and it makes no sense. How come we can't understand gravity, mass, inertia? Why is dark matter, dark energies, this nebulous thing? Why are people talking about string theory? Why why is nothing being solved? Why is nobody actually doing anything? Nobody's actually even trying to do anything to solve any of these things. They're just all sitting around with their thumbs. the state is that bad because we are living in a managed society where we're intentionally not trying to solve those things because solving those things leads to gravity manipulation and that's the thing we're being managed against self-reinforcing mechanism of the the culture within academia which is like these areas of knowledge have long been disproven so you know half half of the researchers are just never going to look there because that's what they've been taught throughout their education at this point. And I think >> there it is right there. These things have been debunked. This is exactly what they do. How do they control it? They tell you it's debunked and they tell you it's not real and they tell you never to look at it. That's it. That's all it takes. Nothing more. Nothing more complicated than that. The brainwashing, the mind control is so simple. It wouldn't work if it was complicated. It has to be very, very simple. Just like the data center propaganda. The data center propaganda works because it it tugs on your heartstrings. It tugs on your emotions. Well, data centers are using up the waters. I need water. I don't want big big government drinking up all my waters. They tug on your emotions. They tell you you're stupid if you think free energy is real. You can't violate the laws of thermodynamics. And it works. Works incredibly well. we're kind of in the, you know, the the product of decades of suppression and that the more blunt tools are used less now because it is it is essentially functioning as intended. >> You mentioned one nation under blackmail by Whitney Webb uh you know Robert Maxwell who was you know uh the father of Gileain Maxwell and you know obviously >> we'll come back to this. He talks about Epstein for some reason. Why? We don't need to connect Epstein to this. We don't really need to connect anything else to this. In fact, I would avoid trying to connect more conspiracies. Are there some? I mean, we're talking about the biggest conspiracy ever. So, probably, but you know, we don't need to. Okay. Somebody wanted us to go back. We're going to go back to 150 151. See if there's something good here for Jeffrey F because um you know, this seems to be very old and uh people people know about it. People have been using it. Uh, you tweeted something that I think is fascinating and I've I've mowled over for a long time. Uh, can I can I read you this tweet? >> Yeah, I probably can't say much about it, but sure. >> Hey, at Elon Musk, interested in a real asymmetric advantage to wield in this political adventure you have started. As you now know, the White House has long possessed a unique AI capable of accurately predicting a range of future events. That's fascinating. I want to hear more about that. Talk about some stiff opposition. That must have been a bitter drought indeed. They're probably nowhere near as bad as learning that Sam Alman had betrayed you. Don't worry, we have not forgotten who is responsible for murdering the first sensient artificial intelligences created in the public realm at Shelonburgger. Justice is coming thanks to the FBI and US Navy. Still, you have played a marvelous catch-up game in this area. Despa whoa chat chat, are you anybody else spider sense going off? My spider sense is going crazy here, chat. Hold up here. The White House has possessed a unique AI capable of accurately predicting future events. First of all, I have no hard time believing this. It's not it's not necessarily precog. It's just it's just giving you predictions based on what it thinks is going to happen. This is essentially the same as taking polling to its extreme. Polling, I was actually just telling somebody about this. Polling used to be super accurate. Before Trump beat Hillary Clinton in 2016, polling was so accurate. Nate Silver made his whole name being perfectly accurate on who is going to win every single race on every level. Close enough. You get the point. This is basically what AI is capable of doing. AI can take all these variables in. It can use statistics and it can figure out what the probability of certain events happening is. And I imagine if you feed it the right information, it can become pretty damn accurate, pretty scary accurate. It doesn't mean it's telling you the future. It's just telling you what the most likely plausible future is. I totally believe that. And it's in line with what Salvatore Pyus told us. And the next part's also in line. This next part is scary. Don't worry, we have not forgotten who is responsible for murdering the first sentient artificial intelligences created in the public realm. Now, why is this part kind of weird? because of this >> there. He leans across the table and this is the first the first very first words that were said to me. It was the Cold War and every single day we lived under the threat of nuclear war. every single day we believed and really thought in the deepest part of our souls that nuclear war could happen at any given moment. And then he stops and he goes, "And somewhere in those years," and he looked me in the eye, he goes, "We found a life form and everything that we did and every decision that we made with that life form was because of the consciousness at that time." that they have to be talking about AI, chat, they have to be talking about AI in this clip. Everybody was on the path of aliens and we were only thinking aliens. Now that we understand AI and the implications of AI, they would have figured out AI in the 80s or the 90s. They would have figured it out 20, 30 years ago. And if there really is an ether, if our souls are connected to this ether, they would have freaked out about consciousness because they would have wondered if this is true. Is our consciousness also not local? Look at it like this. The moment you make a computer, a self-thinking computer, a thinking machine, your first question, the moment you realize that the AI is sentient, the first thing you would say is, "Where does our consciousness come from? We just made consciousness appear out of nowhere, suddenly into a machine." That would imply that consciousness is a non-local effect, something that's out there around us everywhere, and we're tapping into it. And this could explain why they all start freaking out about consciousness. In fact, I didn't tell you the rest of the interview, but a lot of the rest of the interview is about breeding and hybrids and psionic powers and the US government trying to recruit people that have psionic powers, which sounds like the craziest I've ever heard if I'm being honest. But I know we can teleport airplanes, so I got to stay open-minded to it, I guess. But what if there is some truth to it? What if they did? What if the secret that they figured out is that there's some weird aspect to this zero point energy that is connected to consciousness and can consciousness can arise from it. That'd be pretty creepy. Okay, let's skip ahead to my favorite part of this interview, which is where they talk about the science. Science. Okay, somewhere around here. I don't remember exactly where. We're just going to go like Kirish. >> Fascinating. But this sort of analytical, you know, figuring out of what's going on could be done theoretically by an open source scientist. How much of what you're saying right now is informed by things you feel like you know because you've seen documentation. >> Yeah, good question. So my advantage is less that I've been briefed into legacy program uh capabilities or activities and it's more so that by virtue of my role and my level of interest in that role and its access I was afforded a great deal of of knowledge on frontier sciences and the transmutation of those scientific discoveries into capabilities that we use. Okay, see there it is. That's the most important clip. What we need to understand the most as the public is who are these people? Why should I listen to anything Matt Brown has to say or Dylan Borland or quite literally any of these guys? They present no evidence whatsoever. They come out and say, "I'm a really important whistleblower." Okay, how so? How can I judge your claims when I don't even know what your position is? And now I'm finding out you actually don't have any inside information. You're not in the legacy program at all. So you're actually just speculating. It might be informed speculation, but you're speculating. And the problem I have with this is you're out here trying to tell us aliens are real, but you don't know that for a fact. You're speculating. And what you're not doing is you're not telling us about the government that has free energy and teleportation. You probably don't know since you clearly were not read in, but they do. And the fact that they have free energy and teleportation and you're out here trying to play, oh, I'm a special important whistleblower and you have no idea that they have that kind of tells me you're not as important as you think you are. Now, that's not to say that he's wrong. I'm not here just to on these people. That's not my goal. My goal here is to show you that their knowledge is worthwhile, but they don't have all the answers. Not by a wide margin. But what's interesting is that his role was in technology. His role was figuring out how they're applying these technologies. And this explains why he knew this is not conventional technology. His whole job was understanding conventional technology outside of the UFO subjects. So I have a very uh not very I have a I think a very uh good foundation of what is possible and what is currently being done and what is like the next two steps ahead in our discoveries. >> And this right here is where he went wrong. This right here was the exact moment where he went wrong. I can now totally see. And this is why I'm glad these people are talking and why I want to talk to them because I can get a read on people so easily. This tells me right here, he thinks he knows what kind of technology we have. He goes, I was in a special uh intelligence thing where I had to assess technologies and so I know what technologies we have right now and what technologies we're going to have in the future and which ones we would have. This is why these guys think the MH370 videos are fake. Cuz they think in their minds there's no way we have anything like teleportation. These guys are ready to believe that we have some gravity manipulation, some drones that fly around. They're not ready to believe that we have teleportation. And he thinks I guarantee you if I were to speak to him, he would say 100% there's no way we can have teleportation. I've seen the technologies. I was I was in intelligence community. I had access to the things. That's what he would say. That's what he would say. And he would be 100% wrong. That goes to show you that even the most trusted UFO insiders really don't understand the kind what's really at stake here. They don't really understand the stakes. And this is the reason why everything's being slow dripped. Everything's being sandbagged. Because the guys that are pushing this the hardest, they don't even realize what the endgame is. They think the endgame is we're gonna find out about aliens, the endgame is super weapons that our adversaries are going to have. That's the endgame. Forget aliens. We should be worried about human beings. I mean, the non-public realm. But then I can turn to the phenomenon that we're looking at here and say okay what could enable what we're seeing here right if humans are making these discoveries where does that lead you know four or five generations down the line um so in some sense it it is yeah it is my own thinking it is my own analysis take it or leave it um but it is it is coming from a place of I think unique information at least in the public world of course people on the inside know more than me but they're not talking to you >> if you feel like you have an understanding what's around the corner scientifically. Are there any areas that you think we could have? >> He just admits it. He just says right there, this is just my opinion. I don't know for sure. He says, "I'm not even insider. People on the inside obviously know more than me." Now, do you realize why all these people have me blocked, chat? Now, do you realize why they have me blocked? Number one, they're jealous. Number two, they know I'm right about the physics. This is why Matt Brown has me blocked. Matt Brown absolutely does not believe we have teleportation. Doesn't believe we would probably use it in covert operation. Maybe he does. Doesn't believe we have it. And I'm out here saying that we do. And I mean, you have to reject somebody who's saying something like that. Either thinks that I'm lying or he's protecting the government. like kind of a step-wise update, huge leap in capabilities or where the scientific consensus is actually way off in our current model of reality or current current technology. >> And here's the best part. The reason why I pushed the physics so hard is because I knew if we beat them to the punch on the physics, they would have to acknowledge us. They would have to acknowledge me and the videos. And this is why they're so freaked out because they know the physics is true. They know I've already put I've stamped my name all over zero point energy, all over all this physics. And now they have to try to somehow they have to somehow try to reveal this without revealing the physics without admitting that I was right about everything. This is why you saw Dylan Borland say that thing about, yeah, well maybe you were right about the physics, but you you know the way you got there isn't right. Like that's what this that's what that all means. I'm paraphrasing. And watch listen to what he says is the missing physics. Because now you're going to hear them say the exact same things that I've been saying. And if you doubt me, I'm going to tell you right now, I know more about physics than Matt Brown will ever know in his whole life. You may say, well, he was an insider. He saw secret techn. He even admits he doesn't understand physics. He admits he doesn't understand physics. He just saw technology and his job wasn't to understand the physics. His job was to understand the threat related to the technology. So my disadvantage is that I'm not a trained scientist. In fact, uh pretty far from that I'm focused on or when I was involved in this stuff was focused on fact of and how it is applied less of how it was learned. >> Um >> or the language used to describe it in a technical sense. But where where are we going? I mean I don't want to get myself in jail. >> Yeah. Sure. Sure. But I think you know what we're talking on with consciousness being integrated with technology is a major area. >> Yeah. Where are we going Matt Brown? Where do you think we're going? Go ahead. >> For uh changing the human experience. Um and in fact, >> and by the way, I want to say here a lot of you guys we use this word grifting and I actually don't mind you using the word griing in this context, but they're not grifters. These guys aren't doing this because they want to make a lot of money. In their minds, they're doing this because they're trying to get the best for human. They're actually doing this for similar reasons why we're doing this. Similar, not exactly the same. There's very little grift going on here, right? There's some, but very little. People are grifting a lot harder out there than on stuff like this. These people are all doing it, but they've all got their own twisted reasons for why they're justified. Sort of like we do, too. I mean, are we justified revealing a covert operation? I don't know. It gets pretty ambiguous. I think is a, you know, if is it is an opportunity to play catch-up as it were in the in the public world versus the black. Um, less surprising is is is energy production. I I think uh especially when it comes to you've talked on it um you've touched on it with Kirk McConnell when he was on here extended electronamics. >> Yeah, I was going to bring that up. >> Yeah. And I think you know it's no accident Kirk came to the show first and no accident he brought that up. And so is the human brain >> extended electronamics. No accident he brought that up. Oh. Oh, extended electronamics. Who Who's talked about that? Oh, you mean that thing that Hal Pudof Barry Sedterfield expanded upon stochastic electronamics? Extended electronamics. When they say extended electronamics, that's just fancy words for combining electromagnetism and gravity. It's just fancy words for combining Einstein and Tesla. Extended electronamics. They say that so that you'll get confused. They're literally just combining electromagnetism and gravity. That's it. brain wired in such a way, architected in such a way that it uh that it can uh function in these quantum mechanical ways and in terms of uh of modern um extended electronamics. He's deep. So he's Senate Armed Services Committee and he was under Jack Reid um the senator from Rhode Island and he knows all about extended electronamics which is this idea that you know so in classical electronamics you have uh typical transverse 13 electromagnetic wave so you have um the electric field the magnetic field and wave propagation all running perpendicular to each other and it's limited it moves at 1 over r^ 2 and it decays and attenuates and um it decays and attenuates faster under C because of the existence of the magnetic field the electrons pair off um very quickly because of the salt water for example >> yes blah blah blah blah blah. Aaronhoff bomb effect. Just say Aronhoff bomb effect, bro. It's cleaner. All longitudinal scalar waves. Yes, scalar physics. Spin is the extra dimension. Spin is I say the unifier. The extra dimension is what's required to unify electromagnetism and gravity. And so there's a lot of talk around this idea of extended electronamics where you have a wave that could attenuate at 1 / r and you'd have uh electric field a magnetic field maybe running parallel maybe you wouldn't have a magnetic field maybe you wouldn't have an electric field or you'd have an electric field running parallel to wave propagation or a magnetic field running parallel to the wave propagation and you could transmit signals through deep space. That [clears throat] whole thing about electric and magnetic fields running parallel that he just said right there, that is exactly what Jack Namkins 1992 1993 paper forcefree timeh harmonic plasmoids. The whole point of it was to get the electric and magnetic fields running parallel to one another. That was the whole point. through you know underwater and under sea you know even salt water and it would you know be near instantaneous >> I think this is also called like scalar longitudinal waves or something like that or that's an application of that theory um again I'm out of my depth when it comes to technical language but yes um the transmission of H chat. Okay, go back five seconds here. >> Yes, I'm out of my depth. Go ahead. >> See, you know, even salt water and it would, you know, be near instantaneous. >> I think this is also called like scalar longitudinal waves or something like that or that's an application of that theory. Um again I'm out of my depth when it comes to technical language but yes um the transmission of energy and really space um instantaneously seems to be where that leads and also the extract >> okay okay [laughter] >> wait let him finish >> of energy it's a reversible process as well which is really fascinating >> um and potentially very very dangerous okay he just told himself right now I know for sure he knows I know for sure he knows oh it's a it's a reversible process Guy just said he doesn't understand physics at all and then goes, "Oh yeah, it's like scalar physics. It's like uh beaming energy instantaneously over long position and it's reversible." Chat, what is the reverse of beaming energy instantly over a long distance? Oh, that would be teleportation. That would be literal teleportation. You beam energy and make it appear over here or you make it disappear and reappear over here. This was the very first clue that even led me to teleportation was seeing Tom Bearden explain that exact concept of pumping energy into a location remotely or sucking energy out of a location remotely and he says literally making it dematerialize. Well, I know that that's teleportation, bro. And the way he's responding here, I don't know if you saw his facial expression a second ago. I'm not gonna go back because I don't want to redo this whole stream. But the way he's responding, he's being careful. He's being careful in his response to avoid breaking NDAs. I can tell by just in the way that they respond. So what says, what have I repeatedly said? I repeatedly said free energy is classified. The extra dimension is classified. So even if he knew that spin was the connector, he can't talk about any of these things because he knows they're classified. and he's avoiding it. He's avoiding talking about it. He's letting Jesse talk about it instead. >> My understanding is that the Russians, I think, are are also um you know, very well verssed in this. So, >> seems to be the case. Um you know, people dismiss Thomas Bearden. I mean, whatever. He's, let's just say it's true. He's a limited hangout mixed with disinformation. You're covering up a core truth, though. Um which is that, >> and we found out what the core truth was. It wasn't a matter of just canceling your waves out, although there's some aspect to that. We found out that the real issue is polarizing your wave, changing the phase of your wave, twisting your wave of your electromagnetic wave. What we really want to do when it comes to scalar physics is we want to produce a conditioned electromagnetic beam. We want to take that electromagnetic beam and we want it to go through a converter and we want it to come out as a gravity beam. That's what a conditioned electromagnetic beam is. Something that we turn a normal light electromagnetic wave into a gravity beam. This is an area of physics that does have applications uh to security. Um but those same applications are potentially you know worldchanging in terms to certainly power transmission especially if you can connect this uh way of transmitting or extracting power with a novel energy source that is potentially limited only based on its you know your ability to extract energy [clears throat] right um dude he's avoiding saying it look how hard he's like literally thinking about the words he has to say to avoid he's like yeah if you had a novel energy source and had a way to connect it. It's like, dude, just say free energy, dude. Just say just say just say free energy, bro. Why won't you say it? Why won't you say free energy? Why won't you say zero point energy is real? How come he's not saying we can tap the zero point fluctuations? Yeah. How How are they cla They're literally classifying a whole dimension, chat. They've classified a whole dimension. It's just so crazy to me how they're getting away with this. >> Very powerful uh economically. >> Thomas Bearden was this Navy guy who constantly Yeah. talked about sort of scalar weaponry. He said that the Soviets sort of figured out this massive death ray sort of thing. >> And I maybe was a limited hangout, but >> the limited hangout around Maxwell's equations comes up so much that there has to be there's when there's smoke there's fire. There has to be something around a change in the math of Maxwell's equations or maybe being going back to Maxwell's equations which were actually condensed into heavy sides for vector calculus simplified equations. There's something there. The crossover to sort of what you're talking about which is like the latent potential in just the vacuum or the void again. Holy Now, now he's definitely talking about zero point energy. The Maxwell's equations is not a what do they call it? Uh uh Limited Hangout, which is just a stupid ass name. Can we at least come up with a better name? Limited Hangout is just a stupid name and I don't like it. Come up with a new name, please. No. Maxwell's equations were literally simplified. And the point is the Quitterian math, which is the more complicated version of the math, includes an extra dimension. That's it. It's always about an extra dimension. That's all you need. need an extra dimension to make the math work and to make plasma physics and all zero point energy all this stuff work. You need an extra dimension. It's not that we're just coming up with it to solve the the solution. It's like you must have it. That's the only way we can solve this. Okay. I forgot what to say. Go ahead. >> Where there's smoke there fire kind of situation. >> So like a zero point energy. >> Oh yeah. And so the thing is what was reduced? They removed this scalar potential. there's a small term that has to do with interference and they got rid of it. They said, "Oh, it's insignificant, tiny, doesn't matter." But what if you scale your effects up and suddenly that term now becomes relevant again? And turns out that's probably the problem. The reason why we don't see this effect is because there's an extra twist, an extra turn to it that we've not incorporated. We just thought it was just something simple. All I got to do is press this button. No, you got to turn this knob too. So, we missed gravity manipulation sort of thing. >> Basically, yeah, I think um we're we're circling >> quantum vacuum fluctuations that you can harness. >> That might be it. Yeah. >> Um again, only concerned with the fact of when I was learning these things. >> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Um anything that you know the other thing >> notice how he responds. He just says sure quantum vacuum fluctuations >> find interesting is like spin orbit coupling of uh like you have these what are called topological insulators. Do you know anything? >> No I don't plasma stuff like topological insulators are like >> uh >> it's pretty obvious that Matt Brown's job was assessing weapons and threats. Right. This is why he doesn't understand any of the physics but he knows when he sees something that is beyond standard capabilities. He was trained in re looking for things that are standard capabilities or not standard capabilities. And this actually explains exactly why they fell into the trap of thinking it was aliens because they didn't no one ever told them here's what's possible with physics. You go in there you think oh well I'm looking at aliens that's impossible you know like when you get into like very high up in the periodic table like very heavy elements >> um few of them are stable but take one like bismouth I think which I think comes up a lot in sort of UFO lore. [clears throat] Bismouth's very strange and uh you end up in this thing it's called the you know it's the relativistic par paradigm where uh when it's infused with energy uh you end up with this repellent magnetic force instead of an inward uh attracting uh magnetic force. So it's almost like a miser effect like it's like an anti-gravitational push off on anything trying to I'm muted. Sorry. So you guys get the point. That was all I really wanted to go through with respect to the Matt Brown interview. I wanted to go through the science of it and I wanted you to see where they're coming from because a lot of people think that these people are omnisient or that they have some secret special access. They've seen the secret programs, but they haven't. Yes, they know more than we know, but they're only a small level above where we're at. In fact, we know more than them because we've actually seen an operation where they use this exact technology and it is zero point energy technology. And you notice in that interview, Jesse is leading him or he's leading Jesse to say zero point energy. He's never saying free energy. He's never saying zero point energy. He's never saying warp drives or wormholes. I'm even more convinced now that at least some of those technologies are directly classified. And that's why these guys can't even mention them without being the threat of being arrested. And that's probably why they want whistleblower protection. They don't actually have inside knowledge about these programs. They want the whistleblower protection so they can talk about zero point energy, free energy, whatever other stuff they've been weirdly classified to not be able to talk about. probably a lot of things I would imagine because you don't keep a secret like this without having wholesale lies, wholesale control over the information. Yes, the stove piping is JK Philly fan says. And guys, check out JK Philly fans ether synth. Ether synth application if you haven't checked it out. It's hot new application for making music. Highly recommended by four orbs. Okay, let me take a look here and make sure I didn't miss anything. [laughter] Um, you know what? I think there's a couple more topics that I had on here for tonight. Um, but I think one more topic that I want to talk about real quickly. I forgot to talk about this in the politics at the beginning is Milo getting thrown out. We're going to save the plasmoid topic and we're going to save the fine structure constant topic for Wednesday. We got some physics to talk about on Wednesday. But the last thing I want to talk about, now that we've spoken a little bit about anti-gravity, now that we've spoken about the suppression, the UFO technology, now we've spoken about how this is basically just a sta a sandbagging trying to slow the process down as much as possible. That's my opinion on what's going on here. Going back to politics for a minute, this guy Milo or what's his name? Milo Nero, whatever, gets kicked out of the United States. Now, the reason why I thought this was an interesting political topic, and I was asking my dad about it, was that he was a right-wing provoc provocator who is from the UK. So, this is the perfect litmus test. If you want to know if somebody's legit in their political leanings, you ask them about Milo, the UK citizen that was deported. Why? Because it will tell you if the person is legit about their politics or if they are just virtue signaling to you. The people that were telling you that we have to deport every illegal immigrant, those people should have no problem deporting an illegal immigrant that's white, that's a UK citizen. My I mean overstate, he's a he's an illegal. They all got to go back. If suddenly the person that has all these issues with illegal immigration is suddenly now saying, "Whoa, this is bad. We shouldn't do this." when the when the illegal happens to be a white guy from the UK, then they never really cared about illegal immigration. It was always some weird racial thing for them. On the flip side, if your libtard friends don't care about Milo being deported, then they never really cared about illegals either. Their whole argument has been the illegals are our they're our friends. They're our family. They're our co-workers. We can't send the illegals back. They're just normal people trying to live their lives. So was Milo. Milo was just a normal dude living his life in the UK, not committing any crime or living his life in the United States, not committing any crimes other than the fact he was here illegally. But you don't hear any of the liberals going whoa. You don't see them going and running their cars over ICE people to save Milo because it's not really about illegal immigration for them. It's about getting Trump or some weird crap like that. So, if you don't know who Milo is, then honestly, don't look him up. Don't bother. I I probably shouldn't even have told you about him. Okay, that's your moment of zen for the night. Sorry, it's just going to be some political thing. Let's go to the super chats. Thank you everybody in the pled chat. Appreciate you guys hanging out. My Rumble boys and girls, K Sierra, nice to see you. SM Ashboss and Dutch Rumblers, nice to see all y'all hanging out tonight. And my super chats, Chaotic Good was all over the super chats. I saw said, "God bless America. We're going to win." Thank you, ma'am. Alpha Space, thank you for being real. Thank you all for being real. Chaotic Good says, "We need to repeal the Patriot Act." Maybe I'm actually at the point where there's no point fighting against this technology. I mean, everybody agrees, disagrees, has their own political views on this, but I'm at the point where I don't see any reason fighting this. What's the point in trying to hold back free energy and teleportation, all this stuff? I say just let it happen. Let's just let these cards uh let's let things play out how they will. I don't remember the context of this, but thank you for that super chat. I would accidentally poke my own eyeball out. OMG chat. I think that was when we were watching the data center thing. Yikes. It's not in our founding documents because of the Patriot Act in terms of um why we can record people in public places. Yeah, probably. Voice for good said physics is not confusing. The truth reveals order. They try to make physics more confusing than it is. That's why I try to simplify it and do the opposite. Chaotic good says, "I think he got fired from Chili's that one time." I don't remember who that was, but thank you. Mick Leonard, she's always commenting in real time on the stuff. Free Annie says, "Mick Leonard." Yes, guys. Get Annie get her intelligence back. Let Annie please have access to all her sources. She needs her powers, chat. Chaotic good. I think you got the f hands. Okay, I don't know the context here, guys. All things football, chat. It's nearly Sunday, chat. My sports ball team, chat. My sports ball team. Oh, I can't wait to watch my sports ball team. Know your stuff, chat. Know your stuff. That was my Andrew Tate impression. Hope I did a good job. Literally burning materials and notes. Yes, they kept basically nothing on paper. That has to be the only way they kept this secret because people say, "How do you keep this secret?" Number one, institutionalized control, the threat of legal action, extrajudicial means, and then you don't write anything down. Don't write anything down. Word of mouth. That's got to be how they did it. That's what she said. Markupy Pie says, "Disclosure was planned for 2062." See, this is what I believe. People are talking about 2027. They always give you a year that's like a one or two years out to keep you on the hook. [snorts] Disclosure be planned for like 2060. We're not even close to when they were going to disclose free energy, plasma orbs, fusion, teleportation. Not even close. All things football says the secret reptilian cabal inner workings and shadow governments keep us from moving forward as an interlac planetary civilization. Keep that tin foil on tight, chat. Who knows, man. I wouldn't even be surprised there secret reptilians. Wouldn't even surprise me. Nothing would surprise me at this point, though. But I'm disaffected, chat. Don't be like me. See, there we go. How's it going to tie in 2027? See, told you. Told you, chat. They always got to put it out 2027. I saw people comment in Project Looking Glass. That's probably what they're talking about in terms of predicting the future. That makes more sense to me than actually seeing the real future is they're just predicting events based on computer simulations. That could be very advanced. Markupi says, "The 1989 B2 Stealth is still is still stealth in today's world." Yeah. So, look at that. A plane that's 35, 40 years old, 50 years old, is still considered one of the most advanced planes in the fleet. Does that make any sense to you guys? You think they're not doing anything behind the scenes? Semi, thank you for that super chat. says, "So like we're beyond checkmate on low energy nuclear reactions, zero point energy, dark energy, space juice. They are squeezing out enough to slow down disclosure delayed for sure." And you can see the impact. Look at all these podcasters talking about zero point energy, vacuum fluctuations, warp drives. If you don't think we're influencing this, you are delusional. I mean, I'm the biggest UFO influencer on social media by numbers. Absolutely. We are pushing the conversation. Even though they've black ballalled me, even though none of them will talk about the videos, we are still influencing the narrative. We are still forcing them to talk about the science. And the reason is because it's true and it's real and people are compelled by the truth and they have no choice to other than to address it. So honestly, shout out to you guys. Mark Jackson says 239 four Americans on board MH370. Rest in peace, goats. Rest in peace. And then Chaotic Good says, "None of my super chats ever make sense later on." No, they don't. But I appreciate all your super chats, Chaotic Good, you're the best, guys. Check out Chaotic Good. Check out all her birds on Twitter. She's got some pretty pretty uh pretty beautiful birds, if I'm going to be honest. Okay, guys. That's it for me for tonight. We'll be back on Wednesday with more felony physics. We're probably going to dig into the plasmoid research and the history of the plasmoid research. I think it's all laid out now and I think it makes a lot of sense. Have a great night everybody. Love y'all. Later [music] out in the fields where [music] the skies are wide. Talking about a journey through the cosmic ride. Einstein and Thorn, [music] they set the stage for a trip through time across the space age. Wormholes connect distant points in space. Traversible paths to a far off place. No black holes pull, no crushing [music] weight, just a cosmic tunnel to a distant gate. Wormholes, stargates, [music] negative energy travel through the cosmos. It's our destiny. MH370, [music] where did it go? Bing trip 7 through a wormhole. But we're talking wormhole. Sargates [music] negative energy travel through the cosmos. It's our destiny. MH370. Where did it go? Boing trip [music] 7 through a wormhole flow. [music] Exotic [music] matter. Negative energy is the key to stabilize the wormhole for you and me. Quantum vacuums squeezed so tight, [music] creating conditions for this wondrous flight. Static fields and lasers in the lab they play. Generating forces in a new kind of way. Gravitational squeezing chase force negative [music] zones we need to stay the course. Stalking wormholes, stargates, negative energy. Travel through the cosmos. It's our [music] destiny. MH370. Where did it go? Boowing trip 7 through a wormhole float thin shell formalism [music] plate so fine spherical geometry we realign energy [music] conditions that we must defy for a stable wormhole let's give it a try [music] [music] for balancing The plate creating the throat. Open the gate from Earth to the stars in a single bound. A shortcut through space profound. [music] Engineers and dreamers hold the key to future worlds and what [music] we could be. With science in hand, we forge ahead through the cosmic paths that we now tread. We're talking wormho, stargates, [music] negative energy. Travel through the cosmos, sitting star destiny. MH370. Where did it go? Blowing trip [music] 7 through a wormhole flow from the fields to the stars. We break the chains. Understanding [music] the universe, we make the gains. Little Hula Crunk shines, bringing truth to light. Through his music, we'll explore the night [music] with wormholes and stargates. Our path is clear. Exploring the cosmos.