Secrets of Toroidal Plasma

Breaking news tonight, a Malaysia Airlines flight with [music] 239 people on board, including four Americans, has gone missing. >> Even as these grainy satellite images released today by the Chinese government >> Again, the Malaysia flight too was a was one shot at China saying knock it off. >> Why shoot it down if it's [music] not hostile? >> Our technologies permit us to manipulate time and space. >> Why the Americans do it? >> We can distance [music] annihilate. This country is very powerful. >> [music] >> Far more powerful than people understand.

We have weaponry that nobody has any idea what it is, and it [music] is the most powerful weapons in the world. Not even close. >> I remember the lines from the Hindu scriptures of the >> [music] >> Bhagavad Gita. Vishnu [music] is trying to persuade the prince that >> [music] >> he should do his duty. And to impress him >> [music] >> takes on multi-armed form and says "Now I am become death the destroyer of worlds." >> [music] >> I suppose we all thought that one way or another. >> [music] >> Who is that guy, chat? Welcome to the live stream.

Your favorite super jacked live >> Ashton Forbes, you know that super jacked guy? >> You know him. There he is, guys. As heard on Joe Rogan, the very same Ashton Forbes, the one and only. >> [snorts] >> Guys, right off the bat, announcement. First of all, Tim Ventura interview went really well. We're going to talk about that in a second. The TV show that I said that I was doing over a year ago is actually going live, finally.

I started to wonder if it was really going to happen. Apparently, it is. Got the notification. Not going to say too much more about it just yet. I think I got like a whole package for promoting it. What I will say is that it's going to go live on the Tucker Carlson Network.

So, be on the lookout for it. A whole episode dedicated to MH370, the videos. There's going to be a whole burning airplane. I'm being told the episode is really good. So, technically TV show, but it's going to be on the Tucker Carlson Network. So, if any of you are wondering how this is all going to play out, I'm pretty excited.

I'm pretty excited to see what happens, chat. And I don't know, he might be going on Joe Rogan, the guy that's doing the TV show. So, hmm. Interesting stuff at foot. And I've been invited back to talk about probably fusion, uh which is sort of the topic tonight. Now, tonight, the main topic's actually toroidal plasmas that we're going to talk about.

We're going to take a look at the Action Lab video that just came out. Pretty surprising that they came out with a video all about plasmoids suddenly. Now, we're way, way further ahead than they are, but I think it's interesting to see where the normies are at and how they're catching up. On Wednesday, we are going to be doing a full deep dive felony physics into a neutronic fusion. So, let's go ahead and get started and I'll teach you how this is going to all connect together for you.

But, basically, today you're going to understand the basics of why it is that plasma is the secret to these orbs that is flying around, these UFOs. And then on a Wednesday we dig deep into the DIRDs, the Defense Intelligence Reference Documents. Why? I'll show you why. Earlier, right before the live stream actually, I was had realized that there are two Aneutronic Fusion Propulsion papers. Not one, two of them.

And I'm not sure I had read both of them. May I probably had and just hadn't realized. >> [snorts] >> So, here's the list of all the DIRDs right here. You guys have wondered about the DIRDs, the Defense Intelligence Reference Documents. Finally found a website that has them all listed out and you can click on each one of these. And it will actually give you the PDF, full PDF. Somebody must have just set this up cuz this didn't exist a few months ago.

And I already know, I already know what you're going to say, "Where is the link?" I know. I did actually didn't post a link for some reason, but it's in here somewhere. Here you go. Here it is. Pretty sure this is somebody's blog.

It looks like there's like a major spelling error on the first page. Maybe the CIA made this, I don't know. But there you go. Okay. So, I noticed when I'm looking at this, this is the precursor for Wednesday by the way. I see that the bottom number 30 is Aneutronic Propulsion.

Aneutronic Fusion Propulsion number 30 here. But then number 37 is Aneutronic Propulsion number two. There's actually two scientific papers on Aneutronic Propulsion. Now, I haven't quite read all of them yet. I was re-reviewing them and I got through one and a half before the live stream. That's kind of why I'm late.

And it's going to be good on Wednesday. You're going to become a fusion expert on Wednesday. I am going to convince you that these UFOs flying around are definitely plasma fusion propulsion orbs. That's what they are. That's why these scientific papers are out there. Is that they're explaining exactly what these plasma orbs that are flying around are.

And that's why I want to reiterate right now, cuz I'm pretty sure I'm the only person saying this. I mean, except for probably some of you who are cheerleading us. These orbs flying around are a combination of a neutronic fusion, which is fusion that nobody thinks we can do because it's really difficult. Zero-point energy extraction, and then turning light energy, electromagnetic energy into a gravity beam. All three of those things. It's a clever engineering combination of those three things are what we're seeing these plasma UFO orbs flying around doing. Thank you, Lulu appreciates it, BTW.

Okay, so here was the major finding that I saw earlier today when I was digging through the papers. It's a very [snorts] subtle thing, but because I've learned so much about classifications, about classified documents in general, something caught came out to me when I was rereading this field reverse configuration portion of this This is from a uh Which one is this from? This is from a neutronic fusion number two. Actually, both papers have the exact same name when you read them when you open them up, so it's hard to tell which one's number one and which one's number two.

That's probably why I was confused at first. Look at what this says right here, chat. There's a little U next to this paragraph about field reverse configuration. Do you know what that U means? That U means unclassified. And you say, "Well, Ashton, what is That doesn't mean anything. It's just Yeah, it's just telling us this is unclassified."

Yeah, but why is it there? The rest of the paper doesn't have Us next to any of the paragraphs. This is actually the only one. There may be one other, I'm not sure, but I when I scrolled through it, I don't see any use next to any of the other topics. The answer is because this is the unclassified portion of the field reverse configuration. There's another portion that they edited out before they gave this to the public.

Because this document, let me switch over and I'll show you what I'm talking about, is the declassified version of this dirt. Looking at the right one here. Yeah. So, you see this is the unclassified version. None of these other things have you next to them. Even inertial confinement has nothing because there's nothing that needed to be classified in any of these portions.

Magnetic confinement, but then when you go to reverse field configuration, there it is, right there. Look at this. Even fusion reactors for propulsion, there's no U next to it up here. The field reverse configuration has a U in front of this paragraph. And that is because this is the only the unclassified portion of it. That means there is a classified portion of the field reverse configuration that they edited out.

That's what that means. Ashton Forbes is very good at his research, and I guarantee you if you FOIA request the classified portion of this, you're going to get it rejected. And this is really interesting, why? Because the more I read through this again, the more convinced I am one of the only ways that we can have a free-floating plasma ball is field reverse configuration. I mean, it's there's only a couple of options, and field reverse configuration is one of them. And now you're telling me there's a classified version of this dirt that the government is keeping hidden?

This We are over the target, Chad. We are so over the target. And yes, because field of reverse configurations are badass. But here, now let's get into it for tonight. I mean that's a good jumping in point. The question you should ask, if you are in the UFO community, I was watching Alien Girl last night.

Shout out to her. I think that's what she still goes by right now. And she is watching this Jay Stratton clip. And I'm watching it and I have some thoughts on this. So I'm let's play this. I want to get your guys' thoughts on this, too. >> Well, in my investigation at the Defense Intelligence Agency, when I when I created the DIA's program called AATIP, we uncovered a deeply hidden buried program that is called the Legacy Program.

And it's made up of organizations such as CIA, the Air Force, the Department of Energy, and defense contractors. And they have been for decades retrieving and reverse engineering craft of non-human origin. And really, as I was uncovering that, I think that you know, the the warning is generated around the the the 80-year monopoly on that secret and trying to protect it. >> What? Jay Stratton is casting himself in the role of the ones that discovered the Legacy Program? That's what he's saying right here. This is like the weirdest I didn't expect him to say this.

Did you Nobody else picked up on this? I have been saying these guys are casting themselves as the ones that that found the Legacy Program. If you guys go back to my live stream where we're watching Hal Puthoff and Avi Loeb, I kept repeating this that these are the Legacy Program. And that they're playing this role they're the ones that found this UFO reverse engineering program. Do you know why that story doesn't add up? That story doesn't add up at all with Jay Stratton saying right there.

Why is there a classified portion of this DIR D? If you're trying to reveal the UFO reverse engineering program, how come your DIR D's your your papers have classified portions to them? Shouldn't you be revealing that? If you're trying to reveal that the CIA and the Air Force and the and the DOE are working together with the defense contractors, which I agree they are. That's what I'm revealing. Then how come you're not naming any names?

How come you're not naming a single name of anybody? You're not even naming a a company. Name one defense contractor. Name one individual directly responsible. How come you're not naming anybody? How come like if you supposedly have this huge criminal cover-up that you're revealing, how come you're not trying to talk to me about it when I'm I'm proven?

I have absolute proof right here. I have proof in my hands in the form of two military videos recorded by the Air Force, conducted by the CIA, and probably the Orbs or Department of Energy cuz it's fusion. So, this story doesn't make any sense. You're telling me you're trying to reveal this secret program, but you're not actually trying to reveal anything. And you're working in lockstep with the government. Lockstep with the government.

And you're getting prime time interviews on Fox News on the on the number one Fox News show? Nothing about this is organic. A random dude with 5,000 Twitter followers is getting prime time spots on national news and he's and he's not even saying anything special, just saying aliens are real. >> [laughter] >> No evidence. Come on, man. Something's not adding up here. But I will say this honestly makes me want to talk to these guys even more.

I'm absolutely sure I've nailed what's going on with Hal Puthoff, Eric Davis, these guys. They're playing both sides. They're not on our side, but they're also not on the side of the people that are keeping everything secret. They're somewhere in the middle. And their allegiance is, yes, they're protecting national security, they don't want to go to prison, they're protecting the technology, but they're revealing the aliens, which I find laughable, personally. I find that to be comical.

I think that that's honestly in in some ways worse than the people that are just hiding everything. Like at least the people that are hiding everything, they have dignity, right? They're like, "Look, we have to hide it all. If we don't hide everything, then they're going to figure out the free energy and they're going to destroy the planet." I can respect that. The people that are like, "Okay, we got to hide the free energy, but we're going to give them aliens."

To me, that's even more messed up, man. That's real messed up. That's like sick mind game [ __ ] that you're trying to play with people. Toying with people's emotions. Mhm. Mhm.

Don't like it. So, anyway, for me, I'm not on any of these people's sides. Now, here's Avi Loeb. Avi Loeb responded. Avi Loeb probably hates my guts. I kind of decided just to go all in on him cuz this whole UFO thing is a complete clown show.

I think you guys can pretty much figure that out. But now Avi Loeb seems to be casting himself in opposition to these woke disclosure advocates, the Jay Strattons of the world. He's, you know, he's questioning, "Why are these guys, if they have evidence, how come they're not bringing this to the government? How How they're not bringing this to Pursue or whatever these guys calling themselves? UAP learning group. How come they're not bringing them?

That's a good point. It's a really good point. If you have this secret evidence and you know the alien bodies are where the alien bodies are, you need to bring that to Avi Loeb right away. I mean, nothing's going to get done, but you can at least pretend, right? It doesn't seem like they're even going through the motions, which is what's alarming to me is like, at least pretend to be trying to get UFO disclosure. At least pretend to bring it to Avi Loeb, but they're not even like, nah, we're not even going to bother with that.

We're going to go to Skinwalker Ranch. Also, pretty convinced this Skinwalker Ranch thing is like the center of the sci-op. First of all, it's very, very, very strange that a TV show about hunting ghosts has prestigious PhD government physicists showing up on it on a weekly basis. Feels like that's their way to get paid on the side. That's my this is my take on it. I don't and for all of this them to also be the the UFO whistleblowers, Eric Davis showing up.

Like, what what is going on with this Skinwalker Ranch show? Especially because if you look at the credibility of the evidence on a show like that, you're doing that for sensationalism. That would be like if I was using the show Ghost Hunters to prove that ghosts were real. I'd be like, well, we probably shouldn't do it where we're trying to like monetize a show, you know? Sends mis- mixed signals to people. I don't know.

Something's wrong. Okay, anyway. Let's watch this clip of Avi. This guy loves the attention. For a guy that loves attention, he could really use a couple more uh public speaking classes though, if we're just being honest with each other here. >> Yeah, so we thought evidence they don't carry much weight. We need to see the evidence and you know, there are some internal contradictions in the story that he tells because he says on the one hand there is a race between the United States, Russia, and other nations and China in trying to reverse engineer alien technology.

But at the same time, he argues that the president of the United States is being shielded from the truth. He's not aware of that. I just cannot imagine a scenario where there will be a race between nations without knowledge of the president. That makes very little sense to me. So, yeah, so >> [laughter] >> without evidence they >> So, I kind of agree with him there, actually. I told you guys I can agree with people even when I don't like them.

There's no way that Trump doesn't know. There was a clip. I was going to look for it, but we don't even really need to bother. Trump always kind of avoids this question and he goes back to telling stories and he says, "Oh, well, those those pilots, they know they saw some crazy stuff and I trust those pilots." That's the kind of stuff people do when they're deflecting. When they can't answer the question themselves cuz they have, you know, NDAs.

And Avi's kind of right. Trump would have to know. We would say, "If there is this reverse engineering program, secret shadow war, race for this technology, the president would have to be aware, generally aware. They don't need to know about every project, but they have to be generally aware that this is going on because it impacts every geopolitical decision that they're making." Right? Trump knows.

And that's why he avoids this question. And we know that there really is this legacy program. It seems insane just from a normal person perspective, put my normy hat on, it seems absolutely insane that that could be real. That there is, you know, alien technology in the hands of the CIA and the DOE, but I think you can call these plasma orbs alien technology. It is sufficiently advanced to us, even if it is human technology. It's so sufficiently advanced to where we're at now publicly that it can be, you know, straight-up alien tech.

And the government has that. What we need to figure out number one is how they're keeping it secret. I mean, this has been a successful, wildly successful suppression campaign. Wildly successful disinformation campaign to hide this whole program. How many people are in this program? Got to be hundreds of people in this program hiding alien technology, and they're hiding it successfully on a daily basis for decades.

That requires a whole system in place. This is why I find the Bob Lazar story so interesting because that's the exact kind of system that would need to be in place to A, even have a program like this, and B, to then keep it secret. Bob Lazar would be the exact kind of leak that you would be expecting if somebody went through the initiation plan and and and washed out. >> [snorts] [sighs] >> So, as I've said before, this is the kind of situation where it's going to be catastrophic disclosure or nothing.

A lot I don't know what the DEI woke disclosure advocates think is going to happen. At this point, knowing what I know about the technology, knowing what I know about its power, I can't ever imagine any situation where somebody's doing a speech saying that the aliens are real and the UFOs are visiting us. Anybody that does that is setting themselves up to be embarrassed in the future. You made a stupid speech about aliens being real and then we find out free energy and teleportation exist? And you're going to pretend like what? You didn't know that?

That's the reason why nobody's going to give a speech about aliens. So, the only way this is coming out is if we find out there's magical technology and then everybody's like, "Oh [ __ ] aliens must be real." That's the only way it's happening. And the only way that's going to happen is with the MH370 videos. Or with videos just like that. It needs to be military videos.

It needs to be in some infrared [ __ ] We need that Predator vision. If you know what I'm saying. And it's got to be undeniable. The MH370 videos like the number one reason why I would even consider the MH370 videos to be fake is cuz it's too good. A lot of people make up some [ __ ] about this would be easy to fake. Those videos are impossible to fake.

The one that you can probably fake is the Gorgon stare because it's like six frames per second from super far away. The Litani and G4 drone video in color fleer is Nobody can ever fake that in a million years. The only reason why I would even consider it to be fake is it it's unbelievably perfect. When you first watch those videos, you're like, "Why am I watching this at all?" Why is this drone flying flying under the wake of the plane just staring at it? Staring at this plane.

Why is it doing that? And then you watch it like zoom in like it's teeing up the shot to watch this plane and you're like, "What's going to happen?" What? But then you realize the reason why it's too good the reason why it's so perfect is because that's perfectly in operation. That's perfectly a military operation and it's being executed to precision. And we are watching them watching themselves do the operation.

Which is insane to me because I didn't think the government could pull off [ __ ] like that. I mean, they could do cool stuff. Stuck Stuck in that virus, Bin Laden raid. But teleporting an airplane? That's some next level [ __ ] Okay, let's go. Let me see actually let me check real quick to see if I got any other bookmarks we need to take a look at here.

Yeah, let's take a look at this plasma video. I got a different one coming up too, but we haven't looked at uh sco Socractic Scribe in a while. But this is going to be relevant. Dusty plasmas chat. When you look at this, you just go there's got to be so much we can learn from this. And I think a lot of people probably knew this is why people have been researching plasma physics for decades and decades and decades.

But I didn't realize how analogous it was to things that are happening on the large scale. And then how it might be analogous to things that are happening on the tiny scale as well. And in dusty plasmas, we're actually now watching the movement, the flow of the plasma. Much like with a magnetic field, we can't see the magnetic field, but if you take some iron filings, you can see the outline of the magnetic field. When we add this dust into our plasma, now we can actually see kind of the flow of the plasma a little bit easier. Pretty cool, huh?

Okay, you want to learn some science? I'm going to set up my thing while get this ready. Now, I do want to say this is for educational purposes only. These guys really do like to copyright strike you here, so we're going to take this piece by piece. Shout out to Action Labs. Here you go.

This is for educational purposes. We're going to learn something about, you know, plasma toroids. Never expected this. This ring of plasma could change the world. Yes, sir. I I You know what?

I think I tried too hard, chat. I should just be making 7-minute videos like this, honestly. And this doesn't even go as deep as my normal live stream contents go. Here we go. Let's learn. >> plasma. Unlike the familiar strands of plasma you might see in a plasma ball, this plasma forms a continuous closed loop.

And believe it or not, this same donut-shaped geometry is at the heart of one of the most ambitious energy projects in human history, nuclear fusion. I'm going to show you how these toroids form and how they're vital in potentially making the first nuclear fusion reactor. And why nuclear fusion might not be as clean of an energy source as it might seem at first. But before we continue, with Halloween coming up, I need to make sure that me and my kids are in good health so we can get a >> Okay. >> [sighs] >> Okay, BTW, I got one of these.

And I thought I had it ready to go, but I don't know where the power cable went. So, I'm looking around for that. Give me a sec. >> uncontrolled fusion. But ever since then, we've been trying to figure out how we can reach the temperatures hotter than the center of the sun required for nuclear fusion, but in a controlled manner. What we found is the key is being able to control plasma. But the problem with regular high-voltage plasmas is this.

Plasmas are hot, like really hot. One common way that we generate plasma is by applying a high voltage between two electrodes. But when those electrodes come into contact with the plasma, they have to withstand its extreme temperatures, which becomes a huge problem when you're trying to reach the insane temperatures of millions of degrees necessary for nuclear fusion. But, in 1884, a German physicist named Johann Hittorf demonstrated a way to generate plasma without electrodes coming into contact with it. Now, to under- >> Generate plasma without the electrodes coming into contact with it. How close are we getting to cold plasma here?

Is this the same concept as cold plasma? You know what? I'm just going to ask. I'm just going to do this live. I got to know right now. It might be It might not be, but I'm curious.

Let me do that. Here we go. Hey, so I'm watching this Action Lab video about the secrets of plasma toroids from just a couple days ago. And at like 2 minutes 30 seconds, he's talking about uh ways to produce plasma or doesn't come in contact with I think the anode or cathode or whatever. Is this like a cold plasma or what's the difference? >> No, it's not cold plasma. What he's showing is a hot plasma heated by an RF inductive field, a 10 MHz alternating current through a coil that induces a circulating electric field inside the xenon globe.

No electrodes touch it because the energy couples in magnetically, which side steps the whole electrode erosion problem that kills arc-based setups. Cold plasma is a different animal entirely. That's non-thermal. Electrons are hot, but the bulk gas stays near room temperature, like neon signs or plasma balls. Action Lab's toroid is the opposite. The charged particles are trapped in a closed loop with no escape path, so they keep absorbing energy and climbing in temperature.

Scale that up with hydrogen and you've basically got a tokamak. The low pressure >> Okay, cool. We don't I don't want to spoil the rest of it. Okay, so not the same as cold plasma, different setup. Cuz we're still doing this hot. I think he explains it kind of came back to me.

I think he explains what it is halfway through. Here we go. >> understand how this is done, we need to talk about how plasma is formed in the first place. If an electron hits another atom with enough energy, it will knock some outer shell electrons off of that atom >> Pay attention. This is probably the most important thing you need to know about nuclear physics. You want to be a nuclear physicist? This is what you need to know.

Imagine the atoms are like little solar systems. And that the ion is the sun in the middle. And that the planets are little electrons. And they're at different distances. And we shoot a laser beam or energy at this. What does it do? It knocks those little planets off.

And now because the planet is missing, now it's positively charged because before it was neutral. And now you just shot an electron off of it. So now it's positively charged. This is what plasma is. That's what plasma is is when you're doing this. And you would say, "Well, this is like why is it stay like glow like that then?"

Because the plasma is consistently staying like this, stable without its electron. Perpetually getting pushed off. >> atom, turning it into a positive ion. So in a regular gas, there are always at least a few electrons flying around. If you apply a high voltage, those electrons speed up and knock other electrons off, causing a cascading reaction effect with even more electrons. And this is a plasma. If the circuit's an alternating circuit like a Tesla coil, then this high voltage is switching back and forth many times per second.

But at any one point, there's still a positive and negative electrode that's in contact with the plasma. But there's another way to generate this alternating electric field without needing a positive or negative electrode. Remember electricity and magnetism are actually two parts of the same fundamental force called the electromagnetic force. And And connected by something called Faraday's law of induction, which tells us that a changing magnetic field produces a circulating electric field. So, instead of using high voltage to create an electric field, we can use a rapidly changing magnetic field to create one. So, how do >> Hello.

We can use a rapidly changing magnetic field to create an electric field. Starting to get pretty close to what Salvatore Pais is saying. Salvatore Pais is saying we can amplify magnetic field strength using frequency and vibration. Let's keep going. >> you make a rapidly changing magnetic field? Well, as a result of another relationship between magnets and current, when you run current through a wire, it creates a magnetic field around that wire. Then, reverse the current and it flips the magnetic field.

So, if you have a quickly alternating current, then you can flip that magnetic field back and forth. >> So, if you were flipping your magnetic field back and forth, you could produce this effect. This sounds really similar to field reverse configuration. Isn't the whole thing of field reverse configuration that the magnetic field suddenly flips? Now you see there's all these parallels. They're not exactly the same, but you see that the same physics concepts are being applied in all of these different fusion ideas.

Configurations, I guess. >> So, at the base of my toroidal plasma machine, you can see I have some thick copper wire and it's running in a circle. This makes it so that there's a magnetic field running up through the center of the coil due to Ampere's law when I turn on the current. And if the current alternates, then the magnetic field alternates. So, now I can have an alternating magnetic field going right up through the center of this coil here. And this alternating magnetic >> So, if the current alternates, the magnetic field alternates, and our magnetic field is alternating what?

Right through the middle? >> [snorts] >> And so, it's going to create a ring around the magnetic field that's alternating. And that's what he's saying here, showing us this diagram, saying, "Okay, well, if you draw your magnetic field, then it's going to create a ring." >> magnetic field creates the swirling electric field above the coils. But we want >> The swirling electric field is presumably where our ring of of plasma is going to be. Let's see. >> That electric field to be so strong it can rip electrons off atoms. So notice something interesting according to Faraday's law.

If I increase the current in the wire, this increases the magnetic field strength, and that in turn increases the electric field at the same rate. >> Hold on. Say that again. >> strong it can rip electrons off atoms. So notice something interesting according to Faraday's law. If I increase the current in the wire, this increases the magnetic field strength, and that in turn increases the electric field at the same rate. >> If I increase the current in the wire, then it increases the magnetic field strength, which increases the electric current. Now, why were we using superconductors again?

Oh, because the superconductors can store massive amounts of current. Massive amounts of current before they explode. So now you see why. Because we're trying to do this. We're scaling this up. We're like, "Okay, well, now, what if I take this exact concept, and now I supercharge this with a superconducting magnets?" >> But there's a way to really get that electric field strength to increase. >> And what do you think the other way?

Now, what Okay, so what you just said there, uh what do you think the way to get it to increase even more is? Hm. Any secrets? Any guesses in the chat? What What else could we do to increase that electric field strength even more? We're already turning on our magnetic field and turning it off.

And when we turn it on and off, it induces a current that flows in a toroidal pattern. And you're going to see the toroidal glow because it shows up like a stable ball. So even though we're just alternating a current very rapidly back and forth, the cord is just not long enough. Even though all we're doing is alternating the magnetic field back and forth, we get a stable ring. This is actually an alternating current flowing back and forth. Okay.

Oh, [ __ ] Okay, we'll come back to that. Here you go. Here it comes. >> Just increase the frequency. The faster you alternate them >> Just increase the frequency. Who guessed it in the chat? Increase the frequency.

Any thoughts on who said to increase the frequency? Oh, yeah. Salvatore Pais. Increase the frequency and you'll get a rapidly increasing magnetic field. This is straight out of the textbooks. And you would say, "Well, then why can't we just increase the frequency until we get to infinity?"

Because the magnet will explode. Your actual superconducting magnet cannot withstand that much current. There you go. And now you might be wondering, "Well, then what else can we do?" Exactly. What else can we do?

Can we make a plasma and do this? Can we make a dense plasma that's superconducting that we don't even need a metal ring? Can we make a meta-material that can withstand the current? Probably. Let me go back a few seconds so you don't miss that. >> electric field at the same rate. But there's a way to really get that electric field strength to increase.

You just increase the frequency. The faster you alternate the magnetic field, the stronger the electric field produced is. >> Faster you alternate the faster you alternate the magnetic field the stronger the electric field will be. Do you guys see that these orbs have to be using these principles of electromagnetism? They have to be. We're looking at spheromak plasma balls flying around an airplane. Perfectly stable.

They're using electromagnetism. Guaranteed. >> So in this device it alternates the current in the wire around 10 million times per second. So this creates an enormous circulating electric field that's strong enough to sustain a >> 10 million times per second. 10 million times per second. That's how fast it's alternating. Think about how fast these frequencies are.

You can't even imagine that how that's how fast that is. >> plasma ripping electrons off the gas above it. >> And you can imagine what's what's it actually doing when we're watching this? What's really happening here is the electrons are being ripped off the gas. This actually contains a monoatomic gas, is xenon or something like that. Why? Because those gases are easily the electrons are easily ripped off of them. That's the only reason.

Could be any gas. But because the electrons are easily ripped off the gas in here that magnetic field flipping through here easily produces this. So then we would say, okay, well the orbs in the MH370 videos are either using very very powerful electromagnetic fields are able to rip the electrons right out of the air or they have their own seed gas inside and that is trapped in that bubble. So, those things might have a fuel source. The fuel source might be very small, though. >> high voltage is necessarily to generate this plasma.

Instead, we're using a very >> Yeah, and some of you and I are realizing this is what I love. You guys are learning along with it. You're realizing like, so what are monster magnets going to do this situation? So, what if this magnetic field is super strong? You're going to produce a mega powerful electric >> current. >> Yeah. This is how we're going to get our mega our what do we call them?

Uh ultra gauss or whatever mega gauss generators. These orbs need to be producing Teslas Tesla magnetic field strengths that are beyond what anyone really thinks is conventionally possible. >> high frequency alternating current. And inside this glass is a sphere of xenon gas at low pressure. The low pressure makes it easier to ignite the plasma because electrons can travel farther between collisions, giving them more time to accelerate and gain enough energy to knock electrons off other atoms. Now, notice how the plasma forms a ring away from the glass without any electrodes touching it.

Compare that to what happens when I use a Tesla coil to create a high voltage plasma. Notice how the plasma is attracted to my fingers, which act as part of the capacitive return path. So, the benefit of the toroidal plasma >> Oh, [ __ ] I love physics. Oh, [ __ ] chat. We can prove that these the plasma orbs are closed systems. Now, we always thought it was a closed magnetic field, right? Closed magnetic field structure, but this is also huge.

If it wasn't a closed structure, we would be seeing arcing between the orbs, just like this. This arcing happens when you have I have a globe, too, chat. Where's my my other plasma globe is back here or something. Okay. It might be missing. I do you another plasma globe, promise.

But anyway, that one goes to where your fingers are at, just like in this. But this one doesn't. This plasma orb just creates a stable and it does not touch the glass. It does It tries not to touch it. Right? Actually set completely separate from the glass.

Never touches it. Now think about the confinement. That's the kind of confinement you want in a fusion reactor. That's the kind of confinement you want when you have your plasma ball flying around in the sky. You don't want it to be like this. This is This here is creating an anode and a cathode, a positive and negative.

So in the middle you have I think it's positive. And then your hand, you have the negative. That's why you see the lightning arc trying to connect it. >> loop is twofold. It doesn't have to be directly in contact with any electrodes. And also because it's a closed loop, there's no escape path for the charged particles, so they stay trapped inside getting hot. There's no escape path for the charged particles.

Now, if you want to turn this into a propulsion mechanism, all you have to do is give it an escape path. And there's probably engineering solutions where you want an escape path. Where you would want to expel things. You can use that expelling it for propulsion. And that's what all the papers are about on Wednesday. Hotter and hotter the more energy you dump [music] into it.

Now, this little plasma ring is nowhere near hot enough for nuclear fusion. But what if we took this same principle of electromagnetic induction and combined it with enormously powerful magnetic fields to contain and heat plasma to over 100 million degrees. >> It's like, "Hey, look, we could do this for fusion. What if we just get really powerful magnets?" And then we could do that. Yeah, exactly. Chat, say free Palestine right now.

Say free Palestine five times right now. Or you don't get you don't get free energy chat. Just kidding. This free Palestine [ __ ] has gone too far chat. It became a The thing became a fad, became a current thing. And now it's just lame again and gay.

Unfortunately, sorry free Palestine people. >> That's exactly the idea behind a device called a tokamak. One of the largest tokamaks in the world is being built in southern France as part of an international project called ITER. Just like our plasma ring, a tokamak uses electromagnetic induction to drive a circulating electric field inside the donut-shaped chamber. Now, this >> Chat, he had a good video going here. I was going to give it 10 out of 10, maybe even 11 out of 10. I would have cheat the scale.

And then he started talking about [ __ ] tokamaks, chat. In this household, we don't respect tokamaks. Why? Cuz the dude that invented them didn't respect them. Why the hell would we respect them? >> As cruel a consultant to us, probably one of the top three theorists in the world said some years ago, we spent 15 billion dollars studying tokamaks, and what we know about them is they're NO DAMN GOOD. >> [laughter] >> LOOK, >> [clears throat] >> THAT'S CALLED LOSING all your aura for those who don't understand the kid lingo these days and the maxing lingos. Tokamaks just lost all their aura right there.

That's Robert Bussard sucking the aura out of tokamaks. You can't go back. Once you've been mogged this hard, you can't ever come back. Tokamaks are done, chat. They're done, they're old, they're busted. Nobody likes them anymore.

They're very cringe. Extremely cringe. Yeah, we're not tokamak-ing anymore, chat. We're off the tokamak chain. We're moving on with our lives. We're not going to be the [ __ ] walker, you know?

Which just goes to the clubs, smoking the marijuanas all day. No, no, no, no. We're going to do something with our lives, chat. >> drives a current through the plasma, helping to heat it. And with additional heating systems, they can reach temperatures close to 150 million degrees. >> Can someone just answer me a question though, for real? Real talk. Is there a fusion What's that guy's name? Tossley Fossley fusion, whatever.

I need someone to tell me why if we had these rings of plasma, they were just like floating around and we're like, "Damn, this is dope." Well, who was like, "Hey, you know what we should do to this? We should cover this in metal magnets." We should put metal magnets in the middle of this and all the way around this, too. Like, whose idea was that? That person I want to erase from history.

If I get one more chance to go back in time one more time, that's the person I'm going to disappear. It's not going to be Adolf Hitler. It's not going to be, you know, any of the other people that we could easily change history. It's going to be this dude. That dude ruined fusion. It's probably some spook that did it intentionally if we go back like 50 years or something like that.

Like seriously, why are you putting a giant metal magnet in the middle of this? Stupid. >> That's 10 times hotter than the center of the sun. But unlike our little plasma ring, a tokamak also uses enormous electromagnets to create twisted magnetic field lines that confine the charged particles, keeping the extremely hot plasma away from the chamber walls. But how do we use this ring of extremely hot plasma to create fusion?

Well, the key is they don't use xenon like in our toroidal plasma here, they use hydrogen. Normal hydrogen atoms have one proton and no neutrons. >> How put off's ground state of the hydrogen atom paper, 1987? Why do you think he wrote his paper about hydrogen atoms? First of all, it's the most basic planable element in the universe, but also it's the key to all fusion. Hydrogen atom is the key to all fusion. And how Puthoff said that if you pull on the hydrogen atom, it will pull energy out of the vacuum. Well, we're definitely pulling on it here.

We're shooting laser beams at it. There just got to be a connection here. >> But there are other forms of hydrogen called isotopes. One of these isotopes is deuterium, which has one proton and one neutron. And another is called tritium, which has one proton and two neutrons. These forms of hydrogen are special because when you heat them to over 100 million degrees, their nuclei start to move incredibly fast and slam into each other. And every once in a while two nuclei can get close enough that the strong nuclear force takes over and binds them together to form a helium nucleus.

And this releases a huge amount of energy. The reaction also releases a single neutron, which flies away at an incredible speed carrying about 80% of the energy released. The forming of these hydrogen atoms into one helium atom is called nuclear fusion. >> So what you're going to realize though, the fact that that neutron carries 80% of the energy is a big problem. You don't generally want your neutrons to carry 80% of the energy because now you need to have a blanket to absorb that neutron. And you're going to absorb in the form of heat.

So really what you want to do is you want to cover it in water so that the neutrons hit the water, heat up the water, boil the water, and then you can make steam. And you want to stay keep people away from it because that's extremely damaging. It's radioactivity when you get hit by neutrons. So what you start to realize from this, going back to our discussion about the nuclear airplane. People should really be wondering how our nuclear powered submarines working. You need a massive amount of shielding for any form of nuclear reaction.

At least fission reaction, and in most fusion reactions, too. And the solution cuz I've read the papers, is basically just move people far away from it. That's the solution. There's no way to shield it perfectly or anything like that. So, when they talk about nuclear-powered airplanes, is it just going to kill people when they get in it, or is it using aneutronic fusion, and they just can't reveal it? Are submarines using aneutronic fusion?

Cuz otherwise, how come there's not more people dying in our submarines from radioactivity? We're just really smart about keeping the people far away from the reactor. >> Mhm. >> Something's kind of sus. So, we don't generally want to release neutrons. When we do aneutronic fusion, what they figured out was we don't need this material mix. If we combine lithium or boron 11, then we get alpha particles instead of neutrons. And alpha particles particles can be used to drive a current.

So, we can get electricity directly if we use a different fusion reaction. Now, we have to solve fusion, but they've already done that, then that's not a problem. >> It creates a lot of energy. So, even though you have to supply a ton of energy to heat the plasma and keep it hot, the hope is that you can eventually get more energy out of the fusion reactions than you put into the entire system. And >> Do you want to know how much more energy you need?

According to the people that wrote the DERDs, you need 30 times more energy out in order to commercially like actually have it be viable. Not one. Q factor of one would be the same amount of energy in that you're getting out. I think the Q factors that they're currently targeting are like three. So, we need way more. And I'm not saying to say this to shoot up poo-poo on fusion.

We will get there, for sure. I'm just letting you guys know that how far away right now even public fusion discoveries are compared to where they need to be from the black project engineers. It's just like it's light years ahead. It's not even the same ballpark. And what people really need to wonder on that front right here. There are companies doing field reverse configuration.

If any of this is true, they have to at least suspect it. David Curley or Dr. Jay Young Park, they have to at least suspect that fusion can tap zero point energy or see some of these effects. Very weird how quiet they are. Makes me think that they've been, you know, you get blessed and you don't rock the boat. If they let you do your fusion thing, you don't rock the boat. You don't bring up stuff like that.

You don't bring up cold fusion ever. Ever. Even if you think it's real, you don't bring it up. Let's go back and listen to the end of this. >> The way we capture that energy from the nuclear fusion is to capture those neutrons that fly off in a surrounding blanket around the reactor. And this heats up circulating fluid, which can then be used to turn a turbine to generate electricity. But we haven't yet built a fusion power plant that produces more usable electricity than the total electricity needed to operate the entire >> And look at that.

You see what he just showed there with the neutron blanket? Does that seem smart to you guys? I don't know how many papers I read about just like solving these problems. It makes you wonder like are they just nobody people doing tokamaks aren't reading any papers about like better ways to do it or they just get pot committed? In poker there's a concept called being pot committed. Where you just put too much money in and now you're committed to it. It's like why aren't you just trying to solve this with a another solution?

And the reason why they've moved to stellarators now, stellarator is like a tokamak but it like twists up and down. It's cuz what they realized is that if you you model the plasma, it doesn't stay perfect. Doesn't stay perfectly circle. Like yes, that's what we would imagine that creates a perfect donut in your tokamak, but the instabilities that begin to form in the plasma start to make it vibrate and shake and then it can it can explode. So in a stellarator, they get around that because basically it's kind of like folding it on half over itself.

So in theory it it cancels out the uh the the drift in the electromagnetic fields to prevent that. So a stellarator is basically taking the geometry of the tokamak and adding a twist to it to in theory reduce one of the instabilities. But ultimately, wouldn't you say that the only way to reduce all the instabilities just do what nature wants it to do? You got to just make your plasma and let the plasma form whatever shape it's going to form. That's what a plasmoid does. >> facility, >> [music] >> but we may be close.

Now, there are a few things to note about these fusion reactors. The first is that even though they're producing nuclear fusion, it's slightly different from the fusion happening at the center of the sun. In the sun, hydrogen nuclei also fuse together to form helium and release energy. But instead of fusing deuterium and tritium directly, the sun fuses ordinary hydrogen nuclei, which are just single protons. This combination happens through a series of reactions called the proton-proton chain, where four hydrogen nuclei eventually combine to form one helium nucleus. This releases energy and neutrinos in the process, not neutrons.

So why don't we use the same process as what's happening in the >> So he's saying that the chain when you think about the fusion chain, what he means is that just because two things interact, that mean it doesn't mean they're done. Those things can decay, they create a particle, and then those things fuse together. This is one of the chains one of the chains that Friedwardt Winterberg wrote about is the lithium chain. And he actually wrote how it's a self consistent chain back into a circle or back into a square if you read his nuclear physics textbook.

So, not necessarily super important just a note important to know how fusion works in general is that there's a full chain, but it's not like fission where it's a a chain reaction that goes on forever. Does eventually stop. But it's just more than one stage usually. >> sun? Well, it's because it's too slow. It seems like the sun is just pumping out energy, but surprisingly on average this what's happening energy and neutrinos in the process, not neutrons. Well, so why don't we use the same process as what's happening in the sun?

Well, it's because it's too slow. It seems like the sun is just pumping out energy, but surprisingly on average the center of the sun is actually producing less heat per unit volume than the human body. So, >> This is pretty crazy, right? What they're basically saying here is this is the way to get around the issue of the stability of the sun. If you look at a fusion reaction or nuclear explosion, you would say there's no way a nuclear explosion or fusion reaction can just stay going for billions of years, but the sun is. The sun is going for billions of years.

So, one of the only ways this is possible is if it's happening very very very slowly. From our perspective is it seems like it's happening very fast because we see this giant fireball in the sky. But from the perspective of the giant the hugeness of the sun, then it's happening relatively slowly. It's actually only releasing a tiny tiny tiny amount of its total energy. Now, I personally believe that yes, this is uh true, but also that the sun is pulling energy out of the vacuum. And that's probably one of the mechanisms by which this occurs.

How can it be that the sun is only releasing so much tiny amount of energy? Technically less energy than almost less energy than the human body is releasing. Think about that. If I were to say I'm a star and I'm releasing heat energy and you would say this is the amount of energy the sun is releasing and you that make you like there's no way, that's [ __ ] You're a low entropy being basically taking no energy to to move around. And the sun is like that, too. That's a pretty mind-blowing thing.

Oh, wait, it is less than the sun's way or less than the body human body. It's way less, 10 times less. I didn't even see the numbers, it was covered up. You guys chat was covering it up. So, yeah, that's pretty weird. >> If we want to produce any significant amount of heat from nuclear fusion here on Earth, we need to start with fuel that's much more reactive and that's why we use deuterium and tritium. And that brings me to the next thing I recently realized about nuclear fusion.

I used to think that nuclear fusion was just a completely clean process where you wouldn't have to worry about radioactive waste or anything. >> Chat, we are we are further than everybody on fusion. This is This is just like mind-blowing to watch this now. Just knowing like we skipped so far ahead. Like we went full One Punch Man. We went full One Punch Man and we trained so hard that now we just beat everybody in one punch and nobody else is even close. My dude's like now just figuring out he's about to explain aneutronic fusion.

He's like I used to think fusion was clean. But then I found out that they release neutrons and neutrons are not clean. It's like yeah, bro. It's called aneutronic fusion. You ever heard of it? Proton boron 11, helium 3, like what Tri Alpha Energy is trying to do?

Holy [ __ ] chat. People are about to be red-pilled and we're going to be like two, three, four years ahead. >> But as you can see, that's not necessarily the case. For one thing, we have to use tritium, which itself is radioactive with a half-life of about 12 years. And remember those high-energy neutrons flying out of the fusion reactors that we're actually using to make heat? Well, when they collide with the materials that make up the reactor, they can actually change some of those atoms into radioactive isotopes. This process is called neutron activation.

But, the good news is that many of these radioactive materials produced in a fusion reactor have pretty short half-lives ranging from hours to years. Although, some of them can last a lot longer, but those are >> I mean, you don't want to be around something for hours or years. Something's going to be radioactive for hours or years is still kind of a problem. >> in small amounts. Now, compare that with nuclear fission reactors like the ones we use today. Those produce radioactive waste containing isotopes with half-lives ranging from decades to thousands or even millions of years. >> Dude, how primitive are we?

Why were we ever doing fission? Once we discovered fusion, we should have completely given up on fission. Fission is so dumb compared to fusion. I mean, fission is good for a bomb, but for energy production, fusion is so much more logical. Look at the half-time. Iodine 129, 15 million years radioactive half-life.

Are you kidding me? Uh plutonium is 24,000 years. This is why we got to go bury this [ __ ] in the Nevada desert in the mountains. Such a waste of time, dude. This is the as far and this is why like the clean energy people actually had a good point. Nuclear power was fission, that was stupid.

But, we should have been doing fusion and we should already be doing aneutronic fusion right now. And we will be in the future. This is an an absolute guarantee. We are not going to be powered by solar power. We're going to be powered by aneutronic fusion. It's the most energy dense fusion source other than extracting zero point energy, which that will also do.

Look at this thing. >> So, nuclear fusion has the potential to be much cleaner than conventional nuclear fission, even though it still comes with some radioactive risks. But, what's amazing to me is that this little ring of glowing plasma demonstrates one of the same fundamental principles that scientists are using to create a new source of energy. And thanks for watching another episode of the Action Lab, and we'll see you next >> Okay. I better not get copyright strike for this cuz I'm pretty sure I dropped more unique info in that little 10-minute clip here or whatever I was doing that than he did.

I'm pretty sure I dropped more science than he did about how fusion works in that period of time. So, here you go again. You want to see it one more time? Whoever sent me this, by the way, thank you very much. Probably it's probably the CCP. CCP is thanking me for all my work helping their intelligence community out to help catch up to United States.

That's cool. I appreciate we don't have to be enemies. We're going to become friends with Russia and China. That's the only way we're getting through this, chat. We don't have to like be buddy-buddies. We don't have to be besties.

But, we got to be chill so nobody blows up this planet. It's the only way it's going to happen. Is somebody going crazy with donations here? Don't worry, we'll get to them in a minute. >> [clears throat] >> Um Tim Pool interview, I want to chat about real quick because one thing I realized from watching that interview that I probably should have sold it as a debate. I didn't realize how much of it was really debating the merits of whether or not they really is a cover-up and whether or not they have this technology and where it's hiding and who's hiding it.

My true opinion is that Tim Ventura has talked to many of the engineers that have worked with the government on special projects. Maybe not necessarily the plasma orbs, but on special projects, you including Salvatore Pais. On stuff he can't talk about. And I'm surprised that even though we're both operating off the same set of details. Tim Ventura seems to think this technology and physics is exist, but that he's not convinced that they're really the government's covered it up or that they have successfully figured it out. He seems convinced that it's real, that the aliens might have it.

Uh if the aliens exist, but not that we've necessarily figured it out. And to me that's wild cuz I know for sure that we have. And I'm just sitting here thinking, what are the ways in which I can convince somebody? You know, to me I thought the strongest argument was the one that I made about the Jasons. The Jasons group. If you guys don't know what that is, maybe I'll play the clip.

I think I have it. Gary Stevenson. Yeah, here it is. Listen to it. >> 2008, the Jason Defense Science Advisory Panel dismissed claims that high-frequency gravitational waves could pose any kind of national security threat. And this >> I view this as a mixed blessing. I learned about this several years after the fact.

The Jason panel, which I believe was led by Dr. Ron Pandolfi, did not cite No, it was Pandolfi requested this particular hearing of the Jasons. And so this was one of the things the Jasons touched on. Every summer the Jasons would be handed a list of, I don't know, five questions or half a dozen questions and uh and say, "Hey, this summer this is what you guys we want you to look at this." And so they they convened every summer when they weren't at school. Uh because they're all profs.

And so uh one of the list one of the things on the list that Ron Pandolfi was highlighting was, "Hey, you know, Bob Baker's out talking to Chinese about high-frequency gravity waves. Should be concerned about this." Um and we we looked at it as a scientific endeavor, not, you know, a defense weapon development program, but they wanted to make sure, you know, there weren't any ill effects of this work. And so is it a security >> Okay. If you need some help, one of the Jasons, what's he talking about here?

Jasons is a group of professors, that's what he says when he says profs, a group of professors that helps the CIA. Ron Pandolfe is a lifer with the CIA. My sources tell me this is just rumor that Ron Pandolfe was one of the ringleaders of this legacy program that they were talking about. And that he's a spook and he's a big liar. But supposedly then, every summer they meet. And one of the topics on this particular year was that Bob Baker who had been researching gravitational waves had been talking to the Chinese.

And Ron Pandolfe was not pleased that Bob Baker had been talking to the Chinese about gravitational waves. So, he wrote him up and they basically did a tribunal in this Jason group that summer where those professors tried to determine if Bob Baker broke national security. Now, I hear that story and I'm going to play the rest of this clip in a second. And I think if gravitational waves aren't real, you would never do any of that. You would never write anybody up.

That story wouldn't shouldn't exist. The only reason why you would ever even begin or ever even begin to get upset about something like that is if you know it's real. If that didn't if if what Bob Baker told the Chinese didn't work, Ron Pandolfe wouldn't have cared. Wouldn't have written him up. This is my argument to Tim Ventura, and that's Tim Ventura right there talking to Gary Stevenson on about this exact story. >> threat or not. And so he got he got them on the list. He got HFGW on the list specifically Bob Baker uh his work.

Uh and so I Bob asked he said right there several >> [ __ ] >> from development program, but you know, Bob Baker's off talking to the Chinese about high frequency gravity. Should we be concerned about this? >> Ron Pandolfi put him on the list said Bob Baker is off there talking to the Chinese about gravitational waves. Should we be concerned about this? How much evidence you guys need? I keep telling you guys I'm from the future. I'm playing the clips that prove the stuff is real, that's out there, that you can't even be rationalized in the other way.

What other angle is there on this? Oh, maybe gravitational waves are fake, but we got to write this guy up anyway? We got to do a tribunal? >> Um and we we looked at it as a scientific endeavor, not you know, a defense weapon development program, but they wanted to make sure, you know, there weren't any ill effects of this work. And so is it a security threat or not? And so he got he got them on the list. He got HFGW on the list specifically Bob Baker uh his work.

Uh and so I Bob asked should I did I want to go along to the Jasons and be at the hearing. And I said heck yeah, a free ride to San Diego. So Bob and I drove down to San Diego. Right. Bob and I drove down to San Diego. We lived in LA both at the time.

So we carpooled uh down to San Diego which were it was it was at San Diego at the time. Uh I think it travels around or it did. It's canceled now. But at the time it was in San Diego. So we drove down to San Diego. >> Oh yeah, it's canceled now, Chad. I'm sure. >> go and met with them.

And um you know, basically that they were non-believers. They they said the you know, all these effects are too weak to be useful. Uh I pointed out, you know, even weak effects can be useful for for communication if it's not below the the noise of the universe. Uh and so they got hung up, I think, on the Gershtein effect because I had invoked on one of my papers, not all of them, but one of my I invoked the Gershtein effect as one possible technique for not only emitting gravitons, but for collecting gravitons. Basically, you say you put >> So, Gary Stevenson goes with Bob Baker.

He's playing it off like it was just a a road trip to San Diego, which is obviously [ __ ] because he's referencing his papers in defense of Bob Baker, but in defense of Bob Baker in a way that would get him in trouble. This is the weirdest part. The whole thing is that Bob Baker supposedly told the Chinese how to do gravity waves. So, if what Gary Stevenson is saying is true, then he did help him. Right? And so, Gary Stevenson was saying, "Look, this could actually be a thing."

And he invokes the Gershtein effect or yeah, Gershtein effect. And the classic physicists are going to throw a fit. Because from a ether perspective of physics, you would say if you hit this voltage threshold suddenly, the electric fields begin to act differently. They begin to shoot out. You say a longitudinal effect. So, Gary Stevenson was speaking to a way by which this gravitational effect could become significant, measurable, realized.

So, they shoot him down. And this is pretty convenient because if they shoot him down and say the Gershtein effect doesn't work, then number one, you've discredited gravitational wave research. And number two, Bob Baker's off the hook. If gravitational waves don't work, then he didn't share anything with China. >> gravitons through a very strong magnetic field in the presence of electric field and out pops photons. So, I don't think that's too big a stretch and Gershtein had used gravitational field equations to do that, to show that. But when you work out the math, it's a very, very, very weak effect.

Very weak effect. If it's you done with the classical field equations. In in comparison with Fontana's, which is quantum mechanical, but when you're using um the classical field equations, you have a very weak coupling constant of you know, it's G over C to the fourth or fifth and it's it's astronomically small effect. So, >> I just realized something there. I'm learning too much. Gary Stevenson referenced Fontana.

Fontana is the one he keeps referencing with respect to the uh photon to graviton transition in the superconductor. And here what he's saying is that Fontana's quantum equations show a much more powerful Gershtein effect. If you use the gravitational field equations, then the coupling is very weak. Therefore, the effect is very weak. So, now I'm very curious to compare. We're going to have AI do this in a second.

Fontana's quantized version of the equations, what's the coupling difference? Why is there a difference at all? Whatever the difference is, there must be the secret to unifying the physics, I would imagine. Perhaps I've got that wrong. Let's see what the AI has to say. Keep in mind, we're going to get some normie response here from the AI.

Let me close my window here. Gary Stevenson in an interview with Tim Ventura was speaking of the Gershtein effect and the Jasons with Bob Baker, how he got rid of Byron Pendalfi. And in this they talk about the Gertsenshtein effect and that Fontana had some quantized version the equations would presumably make the effect very strong but that the gravitational field equations make the effect very small. Is this true and if so what's the difference in comparison between them? >> The initial searches didn't surface the specific interview.

I found your own ex-post pointing to the July 2025 Tim Ventura live stream with Gary Stevenson. >> Wait, what? Why is it acting all weird? It's doing this now? It's like talking to us halfway while it's searching? >> Yes, that's essentially accurate as Stevenson described it. The Gertsenshtein effect is the conversion between electromagnetic waves and gravitational waves in a background magnetic field. A Russian physicist, Mikhail Gertsenshtein, published it in 1962.

Stevenson's point is that when you run the classical field equations, the coupling constant is Newton's G over C to the fourth or fifth, which is so small the conversion efficiency is effectively zero in any lab. That's what the Jasons concluded when Pandolfi convened them. Too weak for weapons or even detection on Earth. Fontana's move is to quantize the problem instead of treating gravity as a classical weak field perturbation. His hyperspace framework treats mass as quantized charge sources obeying Maxwell-like equations in four spatial dimensions. So the photon to graviton transition isn't suppressed by that G over C to the fifth factor.

He proposed using dissimilar superconducting Josephson junctions, S-wave against D-wave, to force spin two transitions, essentially a gravitational laser or gaser. Stevenson extended that to thin film phased arrays and talked about phase transitions above roughly 20 to 30,000 volts with 512 kilovolts as a specific threshold where the fields go scalar. The honest comparison, classical GR gives you a real but vanishingly small effect. The math is solid, the magnitude is the problem. Fontana's version predicts a large effect, but it rests on his own untested reformulation of gravity, not on anything experimentally confirmed. The gap isn't in the classical calculation being wrong.

It's whether his quantized framework is right. That's the part nobody's tested. One angle worth pulling on. Woods published a paper in 2006 showing the Gertsenshtein effect gets considerably enhanced inside type two superconductors because flux vortices channel the magnetic field. And Fontana and Modanese calculated that gravitational wave phase velocity drops by about 300 times in a superconductor. If both of those hold, the classical suppression might not be as absolute as the Jasons assumed, which would make Stevenson's detector designs more interesting than a pure debunk suggests.

I could dig into whether that super conduc- >> Great work. Only one more question. How many dimensions did Fontana believe that there were? >> Four spatial dimensions. He called it the four space or hyper space. All four coordinates are space-like with time demoted to a running parameter tied to the speed of light. Each of those four dimensions hosts one three plus one space-time.

So, you get four orthogonal space-times sharing the same coordinates, and electromagnetism is confined to each one separately. In his later Maxwell formulation of gravity, he framed it as four spatial dimensions plus time, five coordinates total. And in some versions, he added a proper time axis on top of that. So, the core claim is four real spatial dimensions, not the extra curled up ones of string theory, but large ones that everything moves through at light speed.

The part that >> If gravity generally propagates across four spatial dimensions while electromagnetic magnetism is stuck in three, that asymmetry is exactly where Fontana thought the photon graviton conversion could escape classical suppression. Do you look at that chat? How did I know that he was an ether believer, a casual ether enjoyer? It turns out everybody believes the same physics. That's my favorite part was when you look at this, there's not a thousand different physics that people believe. Everybody believes the exact same thing.

It's all just one extra dimension. Put your twist on it however you want, and that extra dimension is what's unifying electromagnetism and gravity. Just as it says right there. He believed that electromagnetism is trapped in our three dimensions, but that gravity extends to the fourth dimension. Meaning now there's a a way to connect the two. This is exactly what we need to change that coupling constant, to change to make it go from very hard to manipulate gravity to very easy to manipulate gravity.

And that's also what everybody is saying. That's what Salvatore Pais is saying when he's talking about bringing down the Schwinger limit. Maybe not exactly the same, but similar. He's saying that we can reduce the coupling constant. We can make it easier to connect to gravity, to make a key that locks in. And now you're just changing gravity at will.

Mhm. >> [clears throat] >> Now, with respect to the Tim Ventura interview, I think I want to do a follow-up. I think you guys are probably down with that. I got a lot of positive comments on that. Um and I would like to probably start with the cold fusion. I really enjoy debating these topics, especially the scientifically suppressed ones, at least ones that I think are suppressed with Tim Ventura, because he's a wealth of information. He lived through these.

He's on video recording um Hutchinson, you know? And Gary Stevenson's hanging out with him as well. He was there. He saw it. He has the inside information. For me, it's not a matter of trying to convince Tim Ventura.

A lot of people are like, "Oh, you're going to convince him." It's like, that's not what I'm trying to do here. What I'm trying to do is number one, to get more information. Some of the stories that he told are really incredible. But number two is for you guys, for the viewers to realize and see how far we've come. I mean, I looked at that and I was watching myself from a objective standpoint and I'm going, there's nobody that can debate me on these topics anymore.

Tim Ventura is one of the most knowledgeable people there is on these topics. Unless your name's Hal Puthoff or Eric Davis, good luck. I don't think anybody's even read those Dirds other than some of you guys and people like me. I doubt Avi Loeb's even read two or three of them. So, on one respect, it's pretty impressive how far we've come. Uh but in another respect, I don't know who can even challenge us anymore.

I mean, this got to be pretty I can see why I'm kind of like, you know, classic physicists wouldn't want to debate. So, I'm going to go ahead and just reiterate my challenge if anybody out there wants to debate me on MH370, on physics, if you're upset that I'm talking about zero-point energy and free energy, and you think that it's you think that it's fake, then you have a you have a duty. You have a moral responsibility to stop the disinformation of Ashton Forbes. And I've told people how to do it. I have a $25,000 bounty for just a URL of a cloud photo.

Literally just a URL of a cloud photo from 2012 to 2014. Nobody can find it. We can debate about free energy and a neutronic fusion and whether or not the government has it and how it works. We can debate about where that missing plane is. Hell, now I'm so knowledgeable about the missing plane, I can actually tell you where we should be searching. Before I could just say I know it's not in the South Indian Ocean.

Now I can say now they need to be searching near the Maldives. They're going to find that thing like immediately once they start searching around near the Maldives, guys. It's a giant plane at the bottom of the ocean somewhere. Ready to go. Okay, let's go to the super chats, guys. Hey pilled chat.

Thank you guys for hanging out. Appreciate y'all tonight. My Rumble chat. K Sierra, S Mash was wild lurker. Not Yoda hanging out in the Rumble chat, double ums. Nice to see you guys, S Mash boss. And my YouTube.

My hardcore YouTubers. Jonathan Zambrea, Zambra. In the orb, that same rapid reversal is what shears the cold plasma sheath, collapses the bubble, and lets the disordered pockets ratchet imbalance into a direct directed domain that remains after the drive stops. Long story short, yes. That field reversal is what's driving the plasma and making it stable and allowing it to do its thing and probably driving fusion, too. Keep in mind, we are looking at a spheromak.

We're going to talk about this more on Wednesday, but it's a sphere that bubble is. This already limits the possible options that this can be from a geometry fusion perspective. And that's what's so beautiful about it, what we've learned. there's only so many configurations that work for fusion. You can actually start to narrow it down very, very rapidly. And now we know so much that we're like we're locked in on field reverse configuration, dense plasma focus. It's somewhere right there.

All right. So, thank you very much, Jonathan. Appreciate that super chat. Jack Ventures, oh, is this person what Okay, I don't know what's going on with this super chat, but we're going to check this out. If this technology exists, thank you, Jack Ventures, and it reveals layers of reality. Why wouldn't its creators prioritize immortality to keep exploring?

This is actually a great question. I have actually wondered Have you not heard me I don't know if you've heard me, but I've actually wondered this myself. This is one of the bigger questions that I have been wondering recently, which is uh why are these people not obsessed with living forever? That is the very first thing that if I had figured out teleportation and free energy, the very next thing I would be obsessed with is okay, well, how do I live forever now? Obviously, living forever is possible. Like we should be able to solve aging with this.

We have infinite energy, we got teleportation, we have time travel control, right? But weirdly, a lot of them are not. Some of them are. A few of them are obsessed with longevity, but Hal Puthoff's like 90 and he's lived three times longer than or three standard deviations longer than most people, but he doesn't seem obsessed with living forever. So, one option would be they have a way to project their consciousness into a new body. We just don't know about it.

Another answer would be that they've realized something about the universe. They've realized that let's say, just hypothetically, that reincarnation is real. If you realize from this physics that our consciousness is actually external, then you're not worried about living forever because you're going to come back again. You're just going back to the ocean. I actually this is one of the most beautiful thoughts of all to me. And the conclusion that I reached is that all of the engineers that do this, they have a spiritual journey where they realize we're all the same.

We're all from the same cosmic ocean of consciousness and we might all be the same person. You'd say that's not possible. We're all living at the same time. It's possible. Time is an illusion. We could all be literally the same person.

And we could just be going through the lifetimes infinitely. Like that's absolutely possible. And if you realize that, then you realize what's the point of living forever? You realize that this universe, this life is way bigger than just one lifetime. All right, we're part of some kind of ecosystem of souls reincarnating probably forever. Right?

So. How's that for an answer for your boss? That's a great super chat by the way. That's one of my best super chats ever even though it's in all caps and you got like seven more coming. So, okay, let's see what else we got. Oh wait, you just super chatted me like three times in a row?

Okay, I hope you I hope you meant to do that, sir. Shouldn't be hard, you're right. You're right. And my guess is they do have immortality. My guess is that they do have immortality. I think that they have cloning and I think they have some some form of immortality.

But what if you make a clone? What if you make a clone and it turns out the clone doesn't end up like you? What happens if you make a clone and you're like that's not me at all. That's a completely different person in that body. How weird would that be? That would teach you a lot about the universe.

You'd be like, huh. You'd be like, so it turns out that it's not all biology. Turns out that there is some weird connection out there. If you discover God isn't what we think it is, wouldn't immortality be your first priority? Mhm, no. I'd be terrified and lost and want to stay alive and understand reality, but that's why That's why God is God is the answer. This is what I think about the woke disclosure people.

They think that all of the religious people are going to lose faith in God when they realize aliens are real, when they realize free energy is real. But actually teleportation and free energy prove God is real. External consciousness proves God is real. So that's the opposite. Quantum effects, which is literally magic on the macroscopic scale, that proves God is real. Anybody wants to debate me on that, happy to.

I'm not even super religious, but that to me is just unequivocally clear. And that's probably why they're hiding it, too. It's not that the religious people are going to freak out. It's the people that all don't believe in God are going to freak out. The people that are cutting their dicks off, going, I can choose if I want to be a certain gender, I can choose my birthday, just like I can just change facts about reality. You tell those people God's actually real and you've going to face consequences for all the stuff you've done in this reality and I don't know.

Those people are going to lose their [ __ ] chat. Those people are going to lose their [ __ ] chat, and they're weak people. They're fragile people. So that's my answer to that. Good Good super chats. I'm excited for the other ones coming up here.

Timothy Foster says, "Wow, Ashton and our group of Orbeez are way ahead of anyone." How crazy is it that you can go back three years in the live streams and you can watch my first live streams, where we're just We literally started with what's positive and negative charge. We actually started with that. You can go watch the first ones. It was like basics to electrical engineering electrical engineering 101. >> [laughter] >> And I was like, "Where are we going to start?" We're going to start at the beginning.

And now we're like years ahead of every single science communicator and YouTuber that talks about physics. Years ahead of them. Who's even the closest? Maybe that plasma guy? But even he doesn't even seem to realize the implications of the stuff that he builds and he does. Guy made a magnetohydrodynamic generator and he's like, "Oh, this is real and I don't know what it's good for though."

Okay. Thank you, Timothy Foster. Appreciate you. Okay, here we go. We've stopped with the caps and we're back. Jack Ventures.

Thank you for all these. I realized a while a while ago that financial markets are a scam. Of course they are. Players use Fibonacci sequences to communicate and execute variations and extract billions. Then you I don't know about that. I don't know if that's a real thing.

But yeah, it's a big scam. What do you think? You can if I were you and you want to invest your money, you want to be smart, just invest where Nancy Pelosi's investing her money, chat. Just do exactly what Nancy Pelosi's doing. She's beating the average person in the stock market like three times over. Like that's I mean, just from a statistical perspective, she has to be cheating.

Right? And sure, of course they're cheating. Everything's rigged. You definitely shouldn't be listening to me because wherever I invest my money, the CIA is going to make sure that that fails. So, don't don't follow me. Also, I'm super bad luck, so don't listen to me.

Do whatever Nancy Pelosi's doing. That's my official advice. Yeah. So, your claims on this technology don't seem far-fetched. Yeah, of course. And the crazy part is you're going to learn that those people know about this.

And you're going to start seeing people investing in these companies. And the question is a lot of people out there going to say, "Oh, well, they're scammers." Like Sunny Whites collected 12 million for a fake free energy device, right? But what if it gives? What if it does work? I'm actually afraid that they're going to straight-up Theranos, they're going to Elizabeth Holmes, Sunny White.

Cuz it's not I mean, even if it works, you can still just get him for like fraud. This is why when I have defended Elizabeth Holmes, which I haven't really defended her much. I don't know if she's guilty or not. But people attack me and say she's obviously guilty. And I say, "Well, what do you even know what she was convicted of? Was she convicted cuz of the lab test didn't work or was she convicted of some other crime?"

And then a lot of people don't even know. A lot of people just, you know, they just know what they saw headline, she's a fraud, that's it. Right? People don't even see people don't even beneath the surface. They don't even ask those questions a lot of time. And that's hopefully what I've done to help make you guys different.

So, yes. I agree with you. I would prioritize immortality as well. But Mhm. And I guess the point here is if they're hiding free energy, fusion, teleportation, what else are they hiding? Well, this is the reason why I said if they want me to stop, they need to give me a Scarlett Johansson clone.

If they've got working teleportation, we had we knew cloning existed like 30 years ago. We banned it. So, we can definitely clone [ __ ] And I want a clone. I mean, it seems like a pretty reasonable ask. They can teleport airplanes, they can get me a Scarlett Johansson clone. Just do an operation to get some hair from her glass or something like that and clone her.

Easy. Anyway. That's the reason why I try not to fall down the rabbit hole though. I'm a little afraid this guy is falling down the rabbit hole, if I'm being honest with you, sir. Is that a lot of people will find out that this stuff's real and they lose their [ __ ] They can't keep a grasp on reality anymore. They're like, "What how can I do my job?

How can Well, cuz this is kind of our reality, man. Yeah, we live in like a jail. We live in a a prison. We're slaves. It is what it is. We still got to do our jobs every day.

Can still appreciate the larger aspects of what's happening in this universe, but we still got to just you know, live our slave jobs. Dr. Forbes, looking good in this shirt. It's my favorite shirt. Absolute favorite shirt. So just so good. We got to get some new ones though. I'm going to work on it.

Jack Ventures, thank you very much, Markiplier, for that super chat. Let's say you realize a lot of things, but you can't ever know everything, right? Like finding God, God must ask himself, "Who created me?" Okay, we're going a little off the rails here, but yeah, you can't ever know everything. I feel pretty comfortable. I'll tell you this, I used to be terrified of death.

I used to be terrified of dying. And I used to think that when I die, nothing I ever did matters going to matter anymore, and I'll just go to dust, and then I'll cease to exist, and I won't feel anything, and it won't matter, but what a life, what a what a waste. And now I don't feel that way at all. I don't feel that way at all anymore. Now, I feel like when I do die, it's not really going to matter because I'm probably just going to wake up somewhere else.

The moment I die, I'm probably just going to immediately wake up somewhere else, some other planet, maybe even some other universe. And it'll feel like no time has passed, but it'll be a completely different world, a different reality. And I wonder what that world will be like. I wonder if they'll have customs. I wonder if it'll be an intelligent world. Mhm. That's part of the reason why I don't care, and you know, they probably will kill me.

People joke about that. They say, "Don't joke about that." I see people saying that they'll kill you, what have you. I would have killed me a long time ago. And that's not even a joke, that's just true. I mean, you can't really have people just spouting off about this, and I'm the most dangerous kind of threat, which is somebody that's just perfectly um transparent, and isn't really afraid of being embarrassed or anything else like that.

Somebody that's just willing to come out and be like, "Yep, this is what it is. I don't care if you want to try to mock me." Somebody that's willing to teach themselves so they can defend themselves against people that try to, you know, uh debunk them, or try to chop them down, which they will do. They always do. But that's the CIA. Again, you know, if our CIA was super smart though, they wouldn't have used these plasma orbs on the plane.

That's the kind of technology That's the kind of trump card that you're not supposed to just use willy-nilly to send a message to somebody. You want to send a message to somebody, shoot them with a missile. That sends a message. You don't break out the plasma orbs and teleportation technology to disappear a commercial airliner. I really want to hope that one day somebody actually answers some damn questions for us on that, by the way. Because I want to hear someone try to rationalize why they thought they had to use plasma orbs in a covert operation on this airliner, why that was a requirement.

There's got to be a million other ways they could have dealt with it, including just vanishing the people before they even get in the airplane. But no, we had a plasma orb a civilian airliner away. Anyway. And then thank you for the last super chat. Thank you for all those super chats. Says, "I meant to super chat you, bro.

A little support for you shedding light on an opaque industry." I appreciate it. And then Jonathan Zaremba Zaremba says, "What frequency and rise time window do you see the MH370 orb footage that would match a single shear collapse of a cold plasma sheath rather than a continuous drive? Might unlock your evidence." I don't know exactly what that means, but I think what you're getting at there is what do you think the rate of rotation is of the plasma orbs before they, you know, do their little field reverse thing and then zap the plane out of the sky? Uh I don't know.

I'm trying not to get too much in like what's the exact frequency. I could be driving into that. I did a little bit and had a AI try to figure it out, but at some point that's where I kind of even cross the line for myself where even I'm not on full-on catastrophic disclosure team. Where I'm like, why would I want to reveal how to actually fully engineer it? And from talking to Salvatore Pais, it seems like where they draw the line is like the exact resonant frequency to make the magic happen. So, okay.

I'm sure China can figure it out on their own. But, I mean I've told you guys enough that definitely how you get around the issue of a part of the way you get around the issue of like how stiff space-time is, you hit the resonant frequency. Treat it like a radio. Treat it like a radio. It's not a matter of just driving the frequency up. It's a matter of hitting your resonant point.

Where tunneling increases. Where you begin to see very powerful effects. Resonance is huge in all of this. Okay, I think that's it for tonight, guys. That was a long amount of super chats. Thank you guys very much for following and hanging out.

Uh go ahead and hit the likes and subscribes. Share with your friends. Guys, Wednesday we're bringing back A-neutronic fusion. I got two scientific papers, A-neutronic fusion one and A-neutronic fusion two. I've already got like a dozen screenshots and talking points that we're going to be going over. I'm going to make you guys experts on A-neutronic fusion on Wednesday.

Have a great night, everybody. Love you all. Peace out. Later. >> [music] >> Out in the fields where the skies are wide, [music] talking about a journey through the cosmic ride. Einstein and Thorn, they set the stage [music] for trip through time across the space age. Wormholes connect distant points in space.

Reversible paths to a far-off No black [music] holes pull, no crushing weight. Just a cosmic tunnel to a distant gate. >> Talking wormholes, stargates, [music] negative energy. Travel through the cosmos, it's our destiny. MH370, where did it go? Boeing 777 through a wormhole flow. Talking wormholes, stargates, [music] negative energy.

Travel through the cosmos, it's our destiny. MH370, where did it go? Boeing 777 through a wormhole [music] flow. >> [music] >> Exotic [music] matter, negative energy is the key to stabilize a wormhole for you and me. Quantum vacuum, [music] squeeze so tight, creating conditions for this wondrous flight. Static fields and lasers [music] in the lab they play, generating forces in a new kind of way. Gravitational [music] squeezing, Casimir force, negative zones we need to stay the course. >> Talking wormholes, stargates, negative [music] energy.

Travel through the cosmos, it's our destiny. MH370, where did it go? Boeing 777 through a wormhole flow. Tensorial formalism plays so fine. Spherical geometry we realign. Energy [music] conditions that we must defy.

For a stable wormhole, let's give it a try. [music] >> [music] [music] >> Coolomb forces balancing the plates, creating the throat, opening gates. From Earth to the stars in a single bound. A shortcut through space profound. Engineers and dreamers hold [music] the key to future worlds and what we could be. With science in hand, we forge ahead through the cosmic paths that we now tread. >> [music] [music] >> With our wormholes, stargates, negative energy, travel through the cosmos and start destiny. >> [music] >> Emirates 370, where did it go? Boeing 777 through a wormhole flow.

From the fields to the stars, we break the chains. [music] Understanding the universe, we make the gains. Lo and behold, the clock strikes bringing truth to light. Through his music, [music] we'll explore the night. With wormholes and stargates, our path is clear. Exploring the cosmos, [music] our future's here.